| Revision as of 07:40, 17 December 2015 editFreeatlastChitchat (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,942 edits →Deletion review← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:38, 1 January 2025 edit undoClovermoss (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators30,780 edits →Editor experience invitation: new sectionTag: New topic | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | |||
| |archiveprefix=User talk:The Bushranger/Archive | |archiveprefix=User talk:The Bushranger/Archive | ||
| |format=%%i | |format=%%i | ||
| |age= |
|age=36 | ||
| |index= | |index= | ||
| |minkeepthreads=2 | |minkeepthreads=2 | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| *If you're here to troll, harass, or vandalise, I might not be able to stop you, but you ''will'' be reverted...and ''''''.}} | *If you're here to troll, harass, or vandalise, I might not be able to stop you, but you ''will'' be reverted...and ''''''.}} | ||
| {{bots|deny=DPL bot}}{{ |
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}{{Togneme Userbox}} | ||
| {{Archives|search=yes|list=] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] -<br/> ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ]}} | {{Archives|search=yes|list=] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] -<br/> ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ]}} | ||
| {{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
| == ] == | == ] == | ||
| I |
I am planning on writing an essay of ], however, before moving forward with it, I will need to go on with planning a name for it and not the term "I don't like who created it" when naming this essay that is going to include the ] element. ] (]) 06:23, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| : |
:I'd strongly suggest you do ''not''. From the discussion at ANI it is clear it is not ]. - ] <sub>]</sub> 06:25, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ::Then who will write it? ] (]) 06:32, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::Nobody should, as it's already covered in other essays, as has been pointed out to you. - ] <sub>]</sub> 06:43, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::where is it covered in said other essays? ] (]) 06:45, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::It's acutally policy. ]. - ] <sub>]</sub> 06:48, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== A cookie for you! == | ||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| I'm sorry but you can't close as speedy keep an article that has been through AFD and DRV when the other side of the debate has not had a chance to weigh in. There were strong views on both sides that you would see if you review the previous discussions. Merging and redirects are common AFD outcomes and routinely included in nominations. Please reopen the discussion to allow all sides to discuss this article. ] <sup>'']''</sup> 09:17, 13 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| :I've reopened it, however I will note that ] states: "The nominator withdraws the nomination or fails to advance an argument for deletion or redirection - perhaps only proposing an alternative action such as moving or merging, and no one other than the nominator recommends that the page be deleted." - yes, merging and redirecting are common outcomes, but ''suggesting a merge'' as the nominator is not what AFD is for - that is what ] is for. - ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 09:31, 13 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Bless you for dealing with that awful ANI thread extensively covering another language wiki's drama on ours to no end. I wouldn't have the patience. Have a happy new year! ] ] 05:22, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::and if it goes to PM its the wrong venue for those users who have previously indicated they wanted to delete. Thank you for reopening this but it really shouldn't have needed to be said. ] <sup>'']''</sup> 09:55, 13 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :Thank you! Just trying to help. - ] <sub>]</sub> 05:28, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yes, your efforts are certainly appreciated, but I wonder whether "tit for tat" is the best choice of words in context . ]] 08:09, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::If there's ] there, it's escaping me, I'll admit. - ] <sub>]</sub> 08:15, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Welcome to the 2025 WikiCup! == | |||
| == Deletion review == | |||
| Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2025 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor, we hope the WikiCup will give you a chance to improve your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found ''']'''. If you have not yet signed up, you can ''']''' and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the ]. | |||
| You recently closed the deletion debate of ] as keep. I want to start a deletion review of this article, and as per the policy I am opening this section to discuss the page with you. The page in question should have been deleted in my opinion because it is complete OR. The articles about ], ] and ] adequately cover all such locations and making this list as "Ziyarat Locations" is just an OR essay. Please give your opinion about this. Please ping me using the re template when you comment. Ty Regards ] (]) 07:31, 17 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|FreeatlastChitchat}} My opinion is that the ] from the discussion was that the article should be kept. If you wish to start a DR then I have no objection or comment to be made there - I simply assessed the consensus and closed accordingly. I will, however, note that "the article should be deleted in my opinion" is ''not'' a justifiable reason for a DR; a DR is to be done when you believe the closure was not in accordance with consensus, not because you believe the consensus itself is wrong. - ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 07:34, 17 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
| For the 2025 WikiCup, we've implemented ] to the scoring system. The highest-ranking contestants will now receive ] at the end of each round, and final rankings are decided by the number of tournament points each contestant has. If you're busy and can't sign up in January, don't worry: Signups are now open throughout the year. To make things fairer for latecomers, the lowest-scoring contestants will no longer be eliminated at the end of each round. | |||
| ::{{Reply to|The Bushranger}} I have just found that there are similar articles, so kinda trout moment for me, I did not even provide this as rationale in the deletion. So should I wait some time to start another AFD or just go with review? ] (]) 07:40, 17 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
| The first round will end on 26 February. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: {{User4|Cwmhiraeth}}, {{User4|Epicgenius}}, {{User4|Frostly}}, {{User4|Guerillero}} and {{User4|Lee Vilenski}}. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from ].</small> ] (]) 00:14, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Epicgenius@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1266471891 --> | |||
| == Editor experience invitation == | |||
| Hi The Bushranger. I'm looking for experienced editors to interview ]. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. ] ] 08:38, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:38, 1 January 2025
 |
|
 | This editor is a Grand High Togneme Vicarus and is entitled to write the Book of All Knowledge: 2nd Edition. |
 Archives |
|
as Aerobird - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 1.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Misplaced Pages:Teahouse#WP:IDONTLIKEWHOCREATEDIT
I am planning on writing an essay of WP:IDONTLIKEWHOCREATEDIT, however, before moving forward with it, I will need to go on with planning a name for it and not the term "I don't like who created it" when naming this essay that is going to include the WP:IDONTLIKEWHOCREATEDIT element. GojiraFan1954 (talk) 06:23, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'd strongly suggest you do not. From the discussion at ANI it is clear it is not coming from a place of good faith. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:25, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Then who will write it? GojiraFan1954 (talk) 06:32, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Nobody should, as it's already covered in other essays, as has been pointed out to you. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:43, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- where is it covered in said other essays? GojiraFan1954 (talk) 06:45, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- It's acutally policy. Assume good faith. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:48, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- where is it covered in said other essays? GojiraFan1954 (talk) 06:45, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Nobody should, as it's already covered in other essays, as has been pointed out to you. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:43, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Then who will write it? GojiraFan1954 (talk) 06:32, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
|
Bless you for dealing with that awful ANI thread extensively covering another language wiki's drama on ours to no end. I wouldn't have the patience. Have a happy new year! jellyfish ✉ 05:22, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
- Thank you! Just trying to help. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:28, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, your efforts are certainly appreciated, but I wonder whether "tit for tat" is the best choice of words in context . EEng 08:09, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- If there's another meaning there, it's escaping me, I'll admit. - The Bushranger One ping only 08:15, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, your efforts are certainly appreciated, but I wonder whether "tit for tat" is the best choice of words in context . EEng 08:09, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to the 2025 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2025 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor, we hope the WikiCup will give you a chance to improve your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page.
For the 2025 WikiCup, we've implemented several changes to the scoring system. The highest-ranking contestants will now receive tournament points at the end of each round, and final rankings are decided by the number of tournament points each contestant has. If you're busy and can't sign up in January, don't worry: Signups are now open throughout the year. To make things fairer for latecomers, the lowest-scoring contestants will no longer be eliminated at the end of each round.
The first round will end on 26 February. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), Frostly (talk · contribs · email), Guerillero (talk · contribs · email) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Editor experience invitation
Hi The Bushranger. I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 08:38, 1 January 2025 (UTC)