Revision as of 23:04, 14 August 2006 editGimmetrow (talk | contribs)Administrators45,380 editsm arch← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:11, 24 September 2024 edit undoRedrose64 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators272,842 edits →top: fix last edit | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Not around|date=2 January 2024}} | |||
*See ] for the userpage. (Warning: may contain test scripting) | |||
<!-- <center><div style="text-align:center;width:60%;padding:1em;border:{{{border|solid 2px gold}}};letter-spacing: 12px;background-color:blue;color:white;font-weight:bold">On indefinite vacation</div></center> --> | |||
* | |||
{| style="float:right;" | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|align="center"|] | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
|] | |||
|} | |||
== |
== Unwelcome == | ||
Since apparently the community accepts talk page bans, the following <i>people</i> are unwelcome to post here in any manner. | |||
You're welcome. Probably the first time I've for closing an ] day. ] 04:01, 16 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
* Kww, Malleus, John, Nuclear, Merridew | |||
This ban includes any other accounts they may hold. | |||
If any of these people have something to say to me, their reprseentative must contact me first through "email this user" and obtain my authorisation. | |||
Their represeentative may not post here on their behalf either. | |||
] 12:00, 15 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Return of sysop user-right == | |||
== Dynabars.js (from ]) == | |||
Hee, sorry for not getting back to you sooner. I've played with the dynabars code a bit at work (''intranet, no direct link, sorry. :('' ) and the new version is quite a bit faster, though quite honestly I haven't used it terribly much. The big improvement that I've noticed is in the responsiveness (my work machine is sloooow!), though quite honestly I haven't used many dynamic bars on one page. Have you considered writing a "loading test" page where we could time tweaks to the code? Just some thoughts. :) | |||
Hi Gimmetrow. Welcome back. I have returned your sysop user-right, and I do hope to see you around a bit more. As always, there's lots to do! As I mentioned at BN, if you could use the ] for the birthdate references, I am sure that will help people in the future. ]<sup>TT</sup>(]) 13:11, 25 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
] 19:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC) (Kylu@Work) (Yes, this really was me!) <b><i><font color="#FF00FF">~Kylu (]|]) </font></i></b> 06:46, 17 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Meg Foster date == | |||
{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|#FF33CC}}}; background-color: {{{color|#ffddff}}};" | |||
Sure. I know Google Books (and more generally Google) gives different results for different users, but if you insert the string ''"Meg Foster" "May 14, 1948"'' on Google Books you should be able to locate it. Obviously if you want to remove the date of birth or want to mention only the year of birth on the basis of privacy concerns you are free to do it, but the reference is certainly correct. ] 08:35, 27 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
|rowspan="2" valign="top" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
== Welcome back == | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em; color: #FF0099;" | '''Thanks for contributing to my successful ]''' | |||
|- | |||
I noticed in the administrator's newsletter that you are again an administrator, and I wanted to thank you for resuming your service, and to welcome you back. ] (]) 01:51, 2 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
|style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid #FF0099;" | To the people who have supported my request: I appreciate the show of confidence in me and I hope I live up to your expectations!<br />To the people who opposed the request: I'm certainly not ignoring the constructive criticism and advice you've offered. I thank you as well!<br /><b><font color="#FF0099">♥! <b><i><font color="#FF00FF">~Kylu (]|]) </font></i></b> 06:49, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
: I swear, I'm talking to walls in here. ] (]) 00:52, 7 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
:: What do you mean? Are you asking me into the latest CCI thing? ] 06:04, 7 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
:I'd use a dynabar in this just to make a point, but then nobody'd be able to use it... c.c <b><i><font color="#FF00FF">~Kylu (]|]) </font></i></b> 06:49, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
:::No :) I was just frustrated that no one does what you did, and few seem to be paying attention. I type 'til I'm blue in the fingers ! ] (]) 10:48, 7 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 22:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] ] 01:10, 27 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == | |||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1187132049 --> | |||
==] has been nominated for merging== | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 03:15, 23 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder == | |||
]This is a reminder that established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.{{pb}}Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the ].{{pb}}Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — ] 00:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Hi, | |||
I was going to suggest that you leave a note at ] to try and attract more attention, but I see you've already done this, as well as go for the FAC. Glad to see you've had some feedback, I'll try to comment as well in the next couple of days. ] 21:14, 29 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
== "]" listed at ] == | |||
:That's OK. I had the advantage of seeing a picture of the relevant hat in one of the sources I consulted (probably Heim) --] 22:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 2#WP:BRRRRRD}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ]] 17:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C == | |||
::I think you've addressed all the comments I had. I've had a quick look for Eastern heraldic images, but with no success --] 17:11, 13 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
<section begin="announcement-content" /> | |||
OK, trying to look at what confuses me: perhaps it's just all the terminology I've never heard, that makes it hard to digest a paragraph in the middle of the article, which is what I typically do to see if I feel like an article has prose problems. When I go to any section in the middle, I'm lost, because I don't have the terminology. So, starting at the top (take my comments for what they're worth - I'm not a prose person :-): | |||
:''] '' | |||
Dear Wikimedian, | |||
*''most formalized within the Roman Catholic Church where every bishop including the Pope is permitted a personal coat of arms.'' | |||
**Should there be a comma after Catholic Church? | |||
*''Analogous customs are followed '' | |||
**Is there any reason not to just say "similar customs" (for us Heraldry Dummies 101 who are already overwhelmed with all the new terminology)? | |||
*''The mitre and crozier is common on institutional arms.'' | |||
**Should that "is" be "are"? | |||
*''Until 1960, the composition of the shield itself was regulated and registered with the Heraldry Commission of the Roman Curia, but after this office was abolished by Pope John XXIII, shield design has had no official guidance.'' | |||
**Should that be "but since this office was ... " ? | |||
All in all, I'm not good at analyzing prose: I just have a hard time getting through the article, but it may be more because it presents so much new terminology for me, and less a matter of the actual prose. Have you asked Tony to have a look? If you get JKelly on board with the images, let me know, so I can support. ] 20:08, 13 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process. | |||
=== Coats of Arms === | |||
This is actually something of a complicated pain, but your expertise in the area will help quite a bit. There are two potential copyrights involved with every coat of arms (and we get this wrong all the time). The first is the design of the arms (the ]). The design can be copyrighted (and, incidentally, trademarked and subject to all sorts of other restrictions which we largely pretend do not exist). You're probably dealing with old enough designs that this is not a concern, but it would be best to know who created what design when. Secondly, there is enough creative content in a rendition of that design for a new ] copyright to be claimed by the person who actually "drew" that representation. These should be drawn by Wikipedians, or someone else willing to release their rendition under a free license, per ] #1. In short, you need to show that a) the design is free and b) this individual drawing of it is free. It is easy for us to claim ] on the design, but there's no excuse for us taking someone else's drawing. ] 01:31, 12 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the ] to learn more about voting and voter eligibility. | |||
:Sincere apologies for any offense. Believe me, it isn't only this nomination I was talking about. If you look over ] right now you will see at least one other one that I've mentioned images being ]. If not quite a daily occurance, it is definitely a regular one. The comment of mine that you linked to shouldn't be taken personally; the intent wasn't to slight the work that you've put in, and coat of arms images are a lot trickier than most of the other images we deal with. I hope you'll accept this apology for what could easily be read as my being dismissive. To answer the other question, scanning your own work would be great. There exists software that helps with coat of arms design and creation, but I cannot recall the name of it. You could also take a look at ] and see who has done good work. Thanks in advance. ] 01:47, 12 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please ]. | |||
::The same uploader uploaded both and ] and]. The latter they identified as coming from '']'', volume II. That may be where the bishopric's coat of arms also came from. I'm not sure if that helps us at all. ] 02:29, 12 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well. | |||
:::Going with an illustration from an old book would work; is finding such a thing easier than making our own rendition? I'm a useless artist, I am afraid. As for the stamp, ] looks like it has all of the things that an image description page needs. ] 18:49, 12 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
On behalf of the UCoC project team,<section end="announcement-content" /> | |||
::::There is a Creative Commons No-Derivatives license. We prohibit non-derivative licenses, just as we cannot accept "no derivatives" textual contributions, so we couldn't use any such images, but you could host them at Flickr or with a similar service. ] 18:25, 13 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
] 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::It is a "]" issue; licenses that disallow derivative use aren't "free as in speech" even if they are "free as in beer", so we disallow them just as we disallow "non-commercial" licenses. Personally, I am a little unsure of the practical usefulness of "no derivative" images; if I change the file format, is that a ]? Still, I wouldn't publish some of my photography under anything but a no-derivative license. As for the other question, reprinting plates from a book doesn't normally have any effect on the original copyright status. It may, however, in specific cases. are that if a work was published before ] ] without copyright notice, that work is in the public domain. If the republication was before 1994 and attached a copyright notice that hadn't existed, the reprint would alter the copyright status. Otherwise, the rule is seventy years after the death of the creator. ] 22:04, 13 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:RamzyM (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Coordinating_Committee/Election/2024/Previous_voters_list&oldid=26721206 --> | |||
== Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> <b>]]</b> (] • he/they) 23:36, 18 September 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 23:11, 24 September 2024
This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Gimmetrow has not edited Misplaced Pages since 2 January 2024. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Unwelcome
Since apparently the community accepts talk page bans, the following people are unwelcome to post here in any manner.
- Kww, Malleus, John, Nuclear, Merridew
This ban includes any other accounts they may hold. If any of these people have something to say to me, their reprseentative must contact me first through "email this user" and obtain my authorisation. Their represeentative may not post here on their behalf either. Gimmetrow 12:00, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Return of sysop user-right
Hi Gimmetrow. Welcome back. I have returned your sysop user-right, and I do hope to see you around a bit more. As always, there's lots to do! As I mentioned at BN, if you could use the Template:Cite web for the birthdate references, I am sure that will help people in the future. Worm(talk) 13:11, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Meg Foster date
Sure. I know Google Books (and more generally Google) gives different results for different users, but if you insert the string "Meg Foster" "May 14, 1948" on Google Books you should be able to locate it. Obviously if you want to remove the date of birth or want to mention only the year of birth on the basis of privacy concerns you are free to do it, but the reference is certainly correct. Cavarrone 08:35, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Welcome back
I noticed in the administrator's newsletter that you are again an administrator, and I wanted to thank you for resuming your service, and to welcome you back. Cullen328 (talk) 01:51, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- I swear, I'm talking to walls in here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:52, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- What do you mean? Are you asking me into the latest CCI thing? Gimmetrow 06:04, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- No :) I was just frustrated that no one does what you did, and few seem to be paying attention. I type 'til I'm blue in the fingers ! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 10:48, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- What do you mean? Are you asking me into the latest CCI thing? Gimmetrow 06:04, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Featured article tools
Template:Featured article tools has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. SWinxy (talk) 22:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (chat!) 01:10, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Category:Catholic personal coat of arms images has been nominated for merging
Category:Catholic personal coat of arms images has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:15, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder
This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
"WP:BRRRRRD" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect WP:BRRRRRD has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 2 § WP:BRRRRRD until a consensus is reached. mwwv(converse) 17:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:PPR
Template:PPR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:36, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Categories: