Misplaced Pages

User talk:Pepperbeast: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:01, 17 January 2016 editMatt Lewis (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers9,196 edits →Excuse me: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 13:17, 1 January 2025 edit undoRiteze (talk | contribs)310 edits →Convenient tag for a section name.: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit App talk topic 
(782 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
|archiveprefix=User talk:Beastiepaws/Archives/ |archiveprefix=User talk:Pepperbeast/Archives/
|format=Y %%i |format=Y %%i
|age=336 |age=1440
|index=no
|minarchthreads=0 |minarchthreads=0
|minkeepthreads=4 |minkeepthreads=0
|archivenow=<nowiki>{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}},{{resolved|,{{Resolved|,{{done}},{{Done}}</nowiki> |archivenow=<nowiki>{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}},{{resolved|,{{Resolved|,{{done}},{{Done}}</nowiki>
|header=<nowiki>{{Talkarchive}}</nowiki> |header=<nowiki>{{Talkarchive}}</nowiki>
Line 18: Line 17:
}} }}


== ] ==
{{Talk header}}
'''Welcome!'''


I think this was kept but ]. Do you want to nominate this again? ] (]) 19:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for ]{{#if:|, especially what you did for ]|}}. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
*]kko
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on {{#if:|]|my talk page}}, or ask your question and then place <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>]<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code> before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!&nbsp;<!-- Template:Welcome --> ] 23:18, 2 August 2007 (UTC)


== November 2015 newsletter == == Not unnecessary ==


not unnecessary. Some external site might want to link to some particular section. ] (]) 17:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Food and drink/Newsletter November 2015}}
&nbsp;&nbsp;<small>– Sent by ] using ] on 23:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)</small>
<!-- Message sent by User:Northamerica1000@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_WikiProject_Food_and_drink/Notifications&oldid=690514012 -->


== Unnecessary reversion. ==
== ] ==


If some other page want to link directly to , how would it do that? ] (]) 17:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692013717 -->


:What do you see as the value of deep-linking into a list with limited information? ] ] 17:42, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
==Disambiguation link notification for November 24==
::Since there doesn't exist any independent page/section on Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, other pages are forced to link to the information where it is present. Thus, an anchor is necessary at this point, if another page want to link to this particular nakshatra. ] (]) 17:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
:::You don't have to make precise links to everything. If the information's not there, it's not helpful to the user. ] ] 22:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
::::There are not only (wikipedia) users who browse these pages, but external websites might also want to make links to necessary information present there. ] (]) 02:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::There is nothing to be gained by deep-linking to information that isn't there. ] ] 02:12, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::There is important information about Astrological leader, Deity, Symbol, Indian zodiac, Tropical zodiac and more about the entity. ] (]) 02:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::Where is it you want to link ''from''? ] ] 03:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::::. ] (]) 03:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::OK, no. Don't add unnecessary anchors to Misplaced Pages to suit the needs of your own web site. ] ] 03:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::There might be many others who might be trying the same. ] (]) 03:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::::And? Why don't you just put the information on your own page? ] ] 04:13, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::::If a copy of information from wikipedia is placed in one's own page, it will result in duplication of information. Moreover, readers will be deprived of timely updates to the information as and when they take place. ] (]) 04:43, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::::::Well, I'm sorry, but deleting anchors that nothing on WP links to is just normal housekeeping. WP editors aren't responsible for your web site. Either maintain your own information or link in a sensible way. ] ] 05:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::::::Can you suggest any other way (which you think is sensible) of linking? This and its peers are significant topics, each of which deserves an anchor of their own, irrespective of weather they are linked to any external website or not. ] (]) 10:18, 1 January 2025 (UTC)


== January 2025 ==
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (&nbsp;|&nbsp;). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>


] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ], rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)


Points to note:
== 3RR at Mujaddid ==
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;'''
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.''' <!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] ] 05:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)


== Convenient tag for a section name. ==
Right or wrong, it isn't a good idea to even get to 3RR if you've been blocked before. ] (]) 20:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


A simple convenient tag was added to a long section name which contained some special characters too. is not constructive in this sense. ] (]) 13:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
== Excuse me ==

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Naturopathy&type=revision&diff=700234316&oldid=700163445

RE your very arrogant 'edit note' to your reversion of my ONLY edit thus far. If you ever use language like that towards me again on the edit table I will simply have to report you. You don't seem to realise how utterly wrong it is, so at some point you will need to be told. It combines incivility with abusing Misplaced Pages's core values. It leaves a stink and ultimately works ''against'' the encyclopedia. It's bullying really. So will you please not do it again? You have no right to say "No." to my edit - or indeed to any editor such as myself. You also frankly have no real right to say what "helps" or doesn't in this area regarding a specific edit like mine (do you realise what that sounds like? It sounds like you have a particular agenda to be frank.)

And it is very-much you who has been "vague" here, not me. You cannot properly tell me what I've done wrong. My new text was not 'vague' - it was balanced. It's about avoiding obviously-biased negative generalisations over what is clearly a collection of different disciplines. 'Naruropathy' is clearly NOT all the exact the same shape of rubbish, so why pretend that it is? It clearly varies! For more here, see my talk page regarding my silly 'warning' (for making one single edit for Christ's sake - I hope you two don't tag-team with each other). Some of the sources used in the article do not use the same encyclopedic standards as Misplaced Pages (why would they? Sources rearely do). We quote information, not linguistic style or approach. The context is always different for a start.

If you can't see that my edit was at-least well-intentioned then I'm sorry but you must be blind. It was also a <u>perfectly good</u> (and needed) edit in area I can only assume you must hold a certain degree of bias towards (or against it does seem). But that is beside the point. Misplaced Pages is supposed to be an encyclopedia, and therefore must use an encyclopedia approach with fully encyclopedic language. Misplaced Pages is not a tabloid newspaper, nor even a broadsheet for that matter. It's an encyclopedia. Full stop. So few people seem to understand that here. ] (]) 20:01, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:17, 1 January 2025


Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Dutch exonyms

I think this was kept but consensus seems to have changed. Do you want to nominate this again? Bearian (talk) 19:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Not unnecessary

This is not unnecessary. Some external site might want to link to some particular section. Riteze (talk) 17:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Unnecessary reversion.

If some other page want to link directly to Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, how would it do that? Riteze (talk) 17:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

What do you see as the value of deep-linking into a list with limited information? PepperBeast (talk) 17:42, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Since there doesn't exist any independent page/section on Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, other pages are forced to link to the information where it is present. Thus, an anchor is necessary at this point, if another page want to link to this particular nakshatra. Riteze (talk) 17:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
You don't have to make precise links to everything. If the information's not there, it's not helpful to the user. PepperBeast (talk) 22:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
There are not only (wikipedia) users who browse these pages, but external websites might also want to make links to necessary information present there. Riteze (talk) 02:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
There is nothing to be gained by deep-linking to information that isn't there. PepperBeast (talk) 02:12, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
There is important information about Astrological leader, Deity, Symbol, Indian zodiac, Tropical zodiac and more about the entity. Riteze (talk) 02:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Where is it you want to link from? PepperBeast (talk) 03:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
From here. Riteze (talk) 03:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
OK, no. Don't add unnecessary anchors to Misplaced Pages to suit the needs of your own web site. PepperBeast (talk) 03:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
There might be many others who might be trying the same. Riteze (talk) 03:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
And? Why don't you just put the information on your own page? PepperBeast (talk) 04:13, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
If a copy of information from wikipedia is placed in one's own page, it will result in duplication of information. Moreover, readers will be deprived of timely updates to the information as and when they take place. Riteze (talk) 04:43, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Well, I'm sorry, but deleting anchors that nothing on WP links to is just normal housekeeping. WP editors aren't responsible for your web site. Either maintain your own information or link in a sensible way. PepperBeast (talk) 05:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Can you suggest any other way (which you think is sensible) of linking? This and its peers are significant topics, each of which deserves an anchor of their own, irrespective of weather they are linked to any external website or not. Riteze (talk) 10:18, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

January 2025

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bluecoats Drum and Bugle Corps. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Bgsu98 (Talk) 05:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Convenient tag for a section name.

A simple convenient tag was added to a long section name which contained some special characters too. Your edit is not constructive in this sense. Riteze (talk) 13:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)