Misplaced Pages

:Suspected sock puppets/WorkingHard: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:24, 16 August 2006 editWorkingHard (talk | contribs)54 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 08:43, 6 August 2021 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)Tag: AWB 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:


---- ----
:It is the IP that needs blocking, not the account. The '''IP''' has been blocked. <font color="#007FFF">]</font>''']'''<font color="#007FFF">]</font>|<sup><font color="orange">]</font></sup> 14:37, 16 August 2006 (UTC) :It is the IP that needs blocking, not the account. The '''IP''' has been blocked. ]]]|] 14:37, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

:It is a shame what is going on with the Jessica Lunsford article. References from verifiable sources should not be deleted in accordance to policy however, I fail to see any strong evidence that would indicate that User: WorkingHard is a sockpuppet. I agree with "Kilo" above. A block on the '''IP''' is what was needed for now. ] 00:50, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

</div> </div>
You guys are some real jackasses, I finally get a username on Misplaced Pages to post with instead of my ip address and your now saying Im a sock puppet? What freaking chinese moron thought that one up ] 18:24, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 08:43, 6 August 2021

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:WorkingHard

Evidence

This user has been reverting numerous deletions of irrelevent information I and other users have made at Jessica Lunsford. This user is obviously upset that I am deleting his advertising having made the website for this dead girl. After a recent edit this user posted as WorkingHard and pasted a note on my talk page that I was banned from posting.Cumberbund 07:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments

It is the IP that needs blocking, not the account. The IP has been blocked. Iolakana| 14:37, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
It is a shame what is going on with the Jessica Lunsford article. References from verifiable sources should not be deleted in accordance to policy however, I fail to see any strong evidence that would indicate that User: WorkingHard is a sockpuppet. I agree with "Kilo" above. A block on the IP is what was needed for now. Tony the Marine 00:50, 17 August 2006 (UTC)