Misplaced Pages

Latest revision as of 11:25, 19 February 2023

Warning from Tasc

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. -- tasc _deeds 06:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Reminder from Isopropyl

When using certain template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. -Isopropyl 06:57, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Why Helo Thar

I notice you've entered an opposition in my Request for adminship, mentioning something about my violating the 3RR. Unfortunately, I don't recall any such incident. Have you mistaken me for another user? -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 03:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I still don't know what you mean. Again, please check out and respond to the questions in the RfA. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 04:09, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Sure, I'll keep checking it out. No need to post here everytime you want me to respond. Quill E. Coyote 04:16, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Quill, if you continue trolling and being disruptive on the RfA, I will block you for disruption. JoshuaZ 04:29, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Every user with an account has a right to vote in RfAs, and it behooves them to back up the reasoning behind their vote when requested. I've done nothing wrong. Quill E. Coyote 04:49, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Your behavior on the RfA is borderline disruptive if not outright disruptive. You are picking an (essentially random) RfA candidate out of dozens and opposing that candidate because they didn't get involved in one case that might have lead up to a 3RR violation. JoshuaZ 04:51, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

He's admitted that he was aware of the potential violation, yet did nothing to help the situation out. That's not becoming of an administrator. Quill E. Coyote 04:54, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Arrrr, I admitted this where? I've been asking you to tell me what you're talking about, and I still have no clue. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 04:57, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Okay, last warning

The template warning message on Consumed Crustacean's page was superfluous. Your editing has been disruptive, and you have been previously advised of the same by an administrator. Should you consider your disruptive edits, you will be blocked. Thank you -- Samir धर्म 08:20, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

I warned Consumed Crustacean in compliance with WP:Vandalism, and don't see what else I was supposed to do. Quill E. Coyote 08:22, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Changing text on your talk page

Please do not change the text on your user talk page and call other users' warnings "inappropriate", etc. If you believe the warnings are inappropriate, please discuss the situation with them on their user talk pages, but do not put words in their mouths on your talk page. Thanks! Srose (talk) 16:24, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Trolling

Unless you stop trolling, this account will be blocked for disruption of wikipedia. `'mikka (t) 19:21, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

A threat from the person inappropriately attempting to invalidate support votes on RfA. Quill E. Coyote 19:45, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

{{block|making a personal attack}} This is following the remark above and also following trolling on ] for which you were warned by JoshuaZ. The block is for 24 hours. ] 20:12, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

{{unblock|The comment was not a personal attack by any means.}}

Justin Bonomo

The article is back and you should quickly source it if you don't want it to be redeleted. See AfD discussion. ~ trialsanderrors 20:03, 28 August 2006 (UTC)