Misplaced Pages

Talk:Occupied Enemy Territory Administration: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:37, 31 January 2016 editAJB43 (talk | contribs)36 edits The Flag of the State of Palestine does not belong on this article: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 09:19, 16 February 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,255 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion 
(26 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Former countries |class=Start}} {{WikiProject Former countries|Ottoman=yes }}
{{WikiProject Italy |class=Start}} {{WikiProject Italy }}
{{WikiProject Ottoman Empire |class=Start}} {{WikiProject Arab world |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Arab world |class=Start |importance=Low}} {{WikiProject Africa }}
{{WikiProject Africa |class=Start}} {{WikiProject Palestine|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Palestine|class=start|importance=low}} {{WikiProject Israel|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Israel|class=start|importance=low}}
}} }}
{{Arab-Israeli Arbitration Enforcement}}


==Undiscussed change of topic== ==Undiscussed change of topic==
Line 14: Line 14:
== The Flag of the State of Palestine does not belong on this article == == The Flag of the State of Palestine does not belong on this article ==


I have twice removed the flag of the State of Palestine from the list of nations that emerged from the Occupied Enemy Territory Administration. User Zero0000 have twice reverted them without showing cause, and falsely claiming I cannot edit this article. I have twice removed the flag of the State of Palestine from the list of nations that emerged from the Occupied Enemy Territory Administration. User Zero0000 has twice reverted them without showing cause, and falsely claiming I cannot edit this article.


Palestine is an only semi-recognized non-entity that doesn't claim what its borders are. It is not a country, and it is thus inappropriate to have the flag of such a non-entity in a factual article, under the guise that this is a country that has arisen from the OETA (the POV of user Zero0000, or any other Misplaced Pages user notwithstanding). That would be factually incorrect, and misleading to anybody who wishes to learn about the OETA. Palestine is an only semi-recognized non-entity that doesn't claim what its borders are. It is not a country, and it is thus inappropriate to have the flag of such a non-entity in a factual article, under the guise that this is a country that has arisen from the OETA (the POV of user Zero0000, or any other Misplaced Pages user notwithstanding). That would be factually incorrect, and misleading to anybody who wishes to learn about the OETA.

: You aren't allowed to edit here either, per ]. Go away. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 01:53, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Cite the source directly. Should you choose to make claims, the onus is on you to cite the relevant article or articles which would expressly and completely prohibit me from contributing and editing this article and its accompanying Talk Section.

Furthermore, it is disrespectful to tell me to go away, particularly when you have not done the base of the base of your due diligence and cited the relevant article or articles that expressly and completely prohibit me from contributing and editing this article and its accompanying Talk Section.

] (]) 06:52, 31 January 2016 (UTC)AJB43

Zero0000, your political views are not a relevant reason to continue to revert my edits. Here, as it pertains to an article on Misplaced Pages, they are not supposed to get in the way of intellectual cleanliness. I highly recommend you get your act together on this issue.

] (]) 06:24, 1 February 2016 (UTC)AJB43

'''About your ] request:''' Your request for a 3O has been removed/rejected. All requests for 3O's, like all other forms of moderated content ] here require ''thorough'' talk page discussion before seeking assistance. Once that has happened, if you are still at a stalemate, you may see dispute resolution. Regards, ] (]) 19:18, 1 February 2016 (UTC) (3O volunteer)

== Map ==

I think the map is misleading, at least insofar as it relates to the northern and southern boundaries of OETA South (Palestine). The 1918 modus vivendi followed Sykes-Picot, the northern border wasn’t moved until 1920 and the southern border wasn’t defined until 1922. ] (]) 13:11, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
:Now fixed with contemporary map. ] (]) 10:03, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

==Mystery Kazas of OETA North (West)==
Alsberg's rendering of ] includes two names of kazas that I am struggling to identify:
* '''Yeniji Kali'''
* '''Im Beidan'''

Efraim Karsh renders them as '''Yeniji Keli''' and '''Umm Biban'''

Gideon Biger renders them as '''Yaniji-Kli''' and '''Umn-Biban'''

Any help solving this mystery would be greatly appreciated.

] (]) 10:03, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

: Biger says "sanjaks of Beirut, Lebanon, Latakiya and the city of Beirut, the kazas (subdistricts) of Hasbaya, Rashiya, Jasr-El-Sojour, the Bay of Antaqia, Yaniji-Kli, Umn-Biban and Alexandretta". says "town of Beirut, Sandjaks of Beirut, the Lebanon, Tripoli, Ladikiya and the Cazas of Jisr-Esh-Shoghur, Antioch, Haran, Bailan and Alexandretta." That's quite some disagreement in names, but kazas could have had more than one name. There was a Bailan Pass somewhere near Antioch. There was a Haran on the ] but that seems too far north. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 13:19, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
: I guess Haran might be located near the current Turkish district of Harran, see ]. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 14:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
: has Beilan. No sign of the others. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 15:05, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
::Thank you. That seems consistent with ].
::The other mystery name appears to be Turkish for “new-castle” (] and ])
::] (]) 20:35, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
]
::: Maybe Harem on that same map (Kaza inland from the Antioch Kaza) is "Haran" in Allenby's report. Since (I understand) Kazas took their names from their administrative capitals, the Kaza name changes if the capital changes, so looking at village/city names on maps might solve it. Also, overlaying the OETN map on Cuinet's maps of Kazas might indicate which Kazas are involved. Are they all Kazas of Allepo/Haleb Vilayet or did OETN extend further north than that? ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 01:53, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Zero0000}} thank you – again – for solving the mystery. I looked at Cuinet’s map as suggested - it has a “Yeni Keui” just above Harem.
::::Almost certainly it refers to ]. As for Yeni Keui, a comparison of google maps and Cuinet suggests it is ]. ] (]) 08:22, 20 March 2019 (UTC){{outdent}}
{{ping|Onceinawhile}} Please look at , in paticular the Latikiya map (1915). Note that the Vilayet boundaries differ from Cuinet's. Just above the Aleppo Vilayet boundary near the coast there is a town "el Urdu" and close by in the NE direction is "Yenidje Keui". Since this region near the coast was certainly in OETN, I propose that a Kaza here is the correct identification. (The spelling Yenidje gets some google hits that I didn't explore yet.) Jisr es Shighur is shown, apparently matching Cuinet's Djisr-Chor. As for Harem, I think a better choice is the Harem Kaza that Cuinet shows directly west from Alep (Harim on the 1915 map). I'll look for the map directly above this one. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 02:05, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

The map in the same series extending further north is . On second thoughts, I withdraw my identification of "Yenidje Keui". If you are less confused than me, perhaps you can summarise your matching of the two lists. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 02:54, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

:Two more sources:
:* Gil-Har’s 2000 paper () says “It is quite clear that the areas of military administration were delineated in accordance with the sketch map that had been designed by Sir Mark Sykes in May 1917.” He sources this to: Memorandum by Mark Sykes, 17 May 1917. Sykes' Papers, St Antony's College, Oxford,32A; G. Lloyd to General G.F. Clayton, Notes on Draft Report of Sykes-Picot Mission.Observation on Arabian Policy written by Sir Mark Sykes, undated. FO 882/16; Mark Sykes to Foreign Office, 24 May 1917, FO 371/3054.
:* , and also shows their ]. It shows Beylan (with no nahiyes) and Harim (with Harim, ] and ] as nahiyes) as kazas.
:To my mind this confirms that (1) Belen (per Allenby’s 1919 “Bailan”) was a kaza, and (2) ] is the relevant locality for Allenby’s 1919 “Haran”. Yenikuei is on a little east of the “flooded in spring” area.
:] (]) 21:26, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

== Place of birth in peoples' infoboxes ==

How, should the entity be written as in the infobox of a person born in, say, ] (modern Lebanon) in September 1919? This is the case of ]. Is the way the location is displayed currently in the article (as ], ], ]) correct? {{ping|Zero0000|Onceinawhile}} pinging recently-involved editors in the talk page. ]] 16:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
:I think your proposal is a good formulation. ] (]) 18:32, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:19, 16 February 2024

This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconFormer countries: Ottoman Empire
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Ottoman Empire.
WikiProject iconItaly
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconArab world Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAfrica
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPalestine Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Misplaced Pages. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconIsrael Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Project Israel To Do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

  • You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
  • You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
  1. Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
  2. Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

  • Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
  • Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!


Undiscussed change of topic

It seems like a few months ago, there was a major modification of this article, without any discussion and moreover without sufficient sources. I revert user:Protozoon's edits back, until it is properly discussed per WP:BRD.GreyShark (dibra) 14:04, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

The Flag of the State of Palestine does not belong on this article

I have twice removed the flag of the State of Palestine from the list of nations that emerged from the Occupied Enemy Territory Administration. User Zero0000 has twice reverted them without showing cause, and falsely claiming I cannot edit this article.

Palestine is an only semi-recognized non-entity that doesn't claim what its borders are. It is not a country, and it is thus inappropriate to have the flag of such a non-entity in a factual article, under the guise that this is a country that has arisen from the OETA (the POV of user Zero0000, or any other Misplaced Pages user notwithstanding). That would be factually incorrect, and misleading to anybody who wishes to learn about the OETA.

You aren't allowed to edit here either, per WP:ARBPIA3. Go away. Zero 01:53, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Cite the source directly. Should you choose to make claims, the onus is on you to cite the relevant article or articles which would expressly and completely prohibit me from contributing and editing this article and its accompanying Talk Section.

Furthermore, it is disrespectful to tell me to go away, particularly when you have not done the base of the base of your due diligence and cited the relevant article or articles that expressly and completely prohibit me from contributing and editing this article and its accompanying Talk Section.

AJB43 (talk) 06:52, 31 January 2016 (UTC)AJB43

Zero0000, your political views are not a relevant reason to continue to revert my edits. Here, as it pertains to an article on Misplaced Pages, they are not supposed to get in the way of intellectual cleanliness. I highly recommend you get your act together on this issue.

AJB43 (talk) 06:24, 1 February 2016 (UTC)AJB43

About your Third Opinion request: Your request for a 3O has been removed/rejected. All requests for 3O's, like all other forms of moderated content dispute resolution here require thorough talk page discussion before seeking assistance. Once that has happened, if you are still at a stalemate, you may see dispute resolution. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 19:18, 1 February 2016 (UTC) (3O volunteer)

Map

I think the map is misleading, at least insofar as it relates to the northern and southern boundaries of OETA South (Palestine). The 1918 modus vivendi followed Sykes-Picot, the northern border wasn’t moved until 1920 and the southern border wasn’t defined until 1922. Onceinawhile (talk) 13:11, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Now fixed with contemporary map. Onceinawhile (talk) 10:03, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Mystery Kazas of OETA North (West)

Alsberg's rendering of the OETA announcement includes two names of kazas that I am struggling to identify:

  • Yeniji Kali
  • Im Beidan

Efraim Karsh renders them as Yeniji Keli and Umm Biban

Gideon Biger renders them as Yaniji-Kli and Umn-Biban

Any help solving this mystery would be greatly appreciated.

Onceinawhile (talk) 10:03, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Biger says "sanjaks of Beirut, Lebanon, Latakiya and the city of Beirut, the kazas (subdistricts) of Hasbaya, Rashiya, Jasr-El-Sojour, the Bay of Antaqia, Yaniji-Kli, Umn-Biban and Alexandretta". This 1919 report of Allenby says "town of Beirut, Sandjaks of Beirut, the Lebanon, Tripoli, Ladikiya and the Cazas of Jisr-Esh-Shoghur, Antioch, Haran, Bailan and Alexandretta." That's quite some disagreement in names, but kazas could have had more than one name. There was a Bailan Pass somewhere near Antioch. There was a Haran on the Aras River but that seems too far north. Zero 13:19, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
I guess Haran might be located near the current Turkish district of Harran, see List of districts in Turkey. Zero 14:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
This map has Beilan. No sign of the others. Zero 15:05, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. That seems consistent with Belen Pass.
The other mystery name appears to be Turkish for “new-castle” (wikt:yeni and wikt:قلعة)
Onceinawhile (talk) 20:35, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Cuinet map
Maybe Harem on that same map (Kaza inland from the Antioch Kaza) is "Haran" in Allenby's report. Since (I understand) Kazas took their names from their administrative capitals, the Kaza name changes if the capital changes, so looking at village/city names on maps might solve it. Also, overlaying the OETN map on Cuinet's maps of Kazas might indicate which Kazas are involved. Are they all Kazas of Allepo/Haleb Vilayet or did OETN extend further north than that? Zero 01:53, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
@Zero0000: thank you – again – for solving the mystery. I looked at Cuinet’s map as suggested - it has a “Yeni Keui” just above Harem.
Almost certainly it refers to Harem, Syria. As for Yeni Keui, a comparison of google maps and Cuinet suggests it is Kumlu. Onceinawhile (talk) 08:22, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

@Onceinawhile: Please look at these maps mentioned once before, in paticular the Latikiya map (1915). Note that the Vilayet boundaries differ from Cuinet's. Just above the Aleppo Vilayet boundary near the coast there is a town "el Urdu" and close by in the NE direction is "Yenidje Keui". Since this region near the coast was certainly in OETN, I propose that a Kaza here is the correct identification. (The spelling Yenidje gets some google hits that I didn't explore yet.) Jisr es Shighur is shown, apparently matching Cuinet's Djisr-Chor. As for Harem, I think a better choice is the Harem Kaza that Cuinet shows directly west from Alep (Harim on the 1915 map). I'll look for the map directly above this one. Zero 02:05, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

The map in the same series extending further north is here. On second thoughts, I withdraw my identification of "Yenidje Keui". If you are less confused than me, perhaps you can summarise your matching of the two lists. Zero 02:54, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Two more sources:
  • Gil-Har’s 2000 paper () says “It is quite clear that the areas of military administration were delineated in accordance with the sketch map that had been designed by Sir Mark Sykes in May 1917.” He sources this to: Memorandum by Mark Sykes, 17 May 1917. Sykes' Papers, St Antony's College, Oxford,32A; G. Lloyd to General G.F. Clayton, Notes on Draft Report of Sykes-Picot Mission.Observation on Arabian Policy written by Sir Mark Sykes, undated. FO 882/16; Mark Sykes to Foreign Office, 24 May 1917, FO 371/3054.
  • This Turkish source lists the Kazas of the Aleppo vilayet, and also shows their nahiyes. It shows Beylan (with no nahiyes) and Harim (with Harim, Barisa and Reyahaniye as nahiyes) as kazas.
To my mind this confirms that (1) Belen (per Allenby’s 1919 “Bailan”) was a kaza, and (2) Harem, Syria is the relevant locality for Allenby’s 1919 “Haran”. Yenikuei is on the map you linked to a little east of the “flooded in spring” area.
Onceinawhile (talk) 21:26, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Place of birth in peoples' infoboxes

How, should the entity be written as in the infobox of a person born in, say, Faitroun (modern Lebanon) in September 1919? This is the case of Camille Cordahi. Is the way the location is displayed currently in the article (as Faitroun, Mount Lebanon, OETA West) correct? @Zero0000 and Onceinawhile: pinging recently-involved editors in the talk page. Nehme1499 16:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

I think your proposal is a good formulation. Onceinawhile (talk) 18:32, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Categories: