Misplaced Pages

User talk:Terabar: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:38, 2 February 2016 editTerabar (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users681 edits →Unblock request.: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 05:07, 28 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(92 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
}} }}


== Also be aware of canvassing == == Some stroopwafels for you! ==

Regarding : read ]. Remember that Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia, not a platform for your personal opinions. ] -] 04:03, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

I asked about the opinion of that user. There is nothing wrong in communication with any person. Yes , Misplaced Pages is not a site of personal opinions. First look into the mirror and read this comment of yours.


"To add a personal note: I've been studying Buddhism and Hinduism for over 25 years now; studying them in combination has helped me to understand both of them better, since they are so closely related." @ ] ] (]) 04:09, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

⚫ :Toucher. Yet, there is a difference in explaining where your interests are, and trying to ease the interaction between editors, versus actively engaging other editors to gain support for your personal opinions. See also ]. ] -] 04:14, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Oh man! When did I ask for any support? You are mistaken. That user ] has the free choice to comment or not.
And Misplaced Pages is not a site of personal opinion? Remember? @]. ] (]) 04:21, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

⚫ :Cheers. Rahul is welcome anyway. Best regards, ] -] 04:28, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

== A barnstar for you! ==


{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
⚫ |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Hey Terabar. Welcome back; I hope you've learned enough now. Remember: ]. All the best, ] -] 10:48, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Special Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Hi, thanks for your nice contribution to Misplaced Pages. You should not upload images from internet, otherwise you are doing good work at Misplaced Pages. Keep it up. Thanks again. ]]  18:29, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
|} |}
: Thanks ]. But what do you want to convey from this if you you were to express this advice in a single line? Huh? ] (]) 12:14, 17 May 2017 (UTC)


⚫ ::Just this: don't get hooked again. When your sense of justice is being offended, you run in to defend what you deem right. Well, you may be right, but you'll need good sources to make your point. And then, still: ]. ] is just not worth it. ] -] 17:13, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Thank you ]. Your comment is very much motivating. You are the first person in the whole of my Misplaced Pages career who appreciated my work. I am very much grateful to you from the bottom of my heart. Misplaced Pages needs motivating editors like you. Thanks again.:) ] (]) 17:57, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

== Love and wisdom ==

Dear Terabar, may 2016 be full of love and wisdom! All the best, ] -] 07:05, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

⚫ == Archive ==

Hi Terabar. I've added MiszaBot to your talkpage, which archives old treads automatically. I've created ], moved your removed treads to there, including the ones you wanted to erase. It's highly recommanded to keep those treads! Other editors may want to know what kind of trouble you run into; removing them gives the impression you've got something to hide. In the end, it's better to be honest. Best regards, ] -] 05:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

: Thanks ]! I am glad that you added that automatic bot. I have 3 questions for you. Please answer as you see fit.
* Are you spying on me?
* Did you really thanked me for this edit mistakenly or you wanted to thank my edit in which I made an unblock appeal?
* Can you please help me on article ]? Thanks. ] (]) 19:47, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

::Of course I'm spying on you! It's called "talk page stalker." Best regards, ] -] 20:32, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

:::I took a look at the article; honestly, you run yourself into unnecessary trouble over there. Both sources don't mention 300,00 (converts). The copy-vio argument is a stupid argument; it was clearly presented as a quote. The only objection could be that you find it ], as Human3015 argued. And then, still, others may find it informative. Take care; there are better reasons to get blocked than this. ] -] 05:47, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
{{od}}
], thanks for guiding me that it could be ]. As far as 30,000 (Thirty Thousand) converts are concerned,if you put two more zeroes then it becomes 3,00,00,00 (Thirty ]). That's what one of the sources from the 1st leading newspaper in India, ] says. I even mentioned that on article's talkpage.
* ] says that 30 lakh Dalits converted to Buddhism in year '''2006'''.
:See
* ] says that more than 1 Lakh Dalits embraced Buddhism in year '''2007'''.
:See

These two newspapers are the leading newspapers in India. You can verify that even on their respective Misplaced Pages articles. I have pasted some of it below.
Misplaced Pages describes ] newspaper as
*''"According to the Indian Readership Survey (IRS) 2012, the Times of India is the most widely read English newspaper in India with a readership of 7.643 million. This ranks the Times of India as the top English daily in India by readership."''
*Its official website can be seen here

Misplaced Pages describes ] newspaper as
*''"It is the second most circulated English-language newspaper in India, with average qualifying sales of 1.39 million copies (as of December 2013). According to the Indian Readership Survey in 2012, it was the third most widely read English newspaper in India (after the Times of India and Hindustan Times), with a readership of 2.2 million people."''
*Its official website can be seen here

Will you now please help me Joshua as you helped me earlier? ] (]) 10:03, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

:So, one ] is 100,000 (western digits)? Which means that 30 lakh is 3,000,000 (western digits)? And 1 lakh is 100,000 (western digits)? Pfooo... Aren't here other sources than these two newspapers? Scholarly sources? ~~

:: Thanks for replying Joshua! There has to be a book written after year 2006 and 2007 to find some scholarly sources. Most of the books are written on that subject before that year. But some of it are of-course written after 2006. For example this one. . But still this one too cites the source from newspaper, ] which is one of the leading newspaper in India. You can check that for yourself. We can mention both the things on the article as it is from the finest sources in the country. What do you think? ] (]) 11:53, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

:::I think it would be wise not to push too hard on this. It wasn't worth a block. The more interesting question is: why are these numbers relevant? If you only mention "30,000" (or 300,000 or 3,000,000) it's just another instance of "mine is bigger than yours." What's the value of that? Better find good sources, which also provide a context, to make it worth mentioning. Bets regards, ] -] 12:08, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

== Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion ==
]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. The thread is ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 15:12, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
:Hi Terabar. I think you better calm down here. You're getting yourself into trouble again. ] -] 16:50, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
:: Terabar, you can see I did not delete your reference and only summarized your text to fit better into the article but you have been deleting well sourced content. All I am saying is to paraphrase them to keep them simple and small and let other sources remain even if they do not align with your POV. --] (]) 17:05, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
::: You seem to have a very strong POV. No problems as long as you discuss with other editors and acknowledge sources that do not exactly align with your POV. --] (]) 17:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
::::In the AN3 complaint, for long-term edit warring on this article. ] (]) 03:19, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

== Edit warring at ] ==

<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''3 days''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. </p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> The full report is at . It does not appear you are able to edit neutrally where ] are involved. I'm also alerting you under ]. ] (]) 14:25, 2 February 2016 (UTC)


== Noticeboard Incidents ==
== The topic of ] is covered by discretionary sanctions under ] ==
] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.&nbsp;The thread is ]. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> ] (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>) 15:17, 17 May 2017 (UTC)


⚫ == Blocked ==
{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''


I've blocked you for 72 hours for personal attacks, disruptive editing, and repeated false allegations of socking despite being warned. Calling allegations "opinion" or "suspicious" is sophistry and pretense. If you persist in this behavior after your block expires, you risk being blocked for considerably longer.--] (]) 19:32, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
'''Please carefully read this information:'''


== June 2017 ==
The Arbitration Committee has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding ], ], and ], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ].


] '''You are suspected of ]''', which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Misplaced Pages accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the ], then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Uw-socksuspect --> <strong><span style="font-family: 'Tempus Sans ITC'">] ]</span></strong> 06:05, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ] (]) 14:31, 2 February 2016 (UTC)


{{Tmbox
: ], What is this? Can you explain to me in simple words? And why can't you unblock me? I didn't make 3 reverts in a one day. I told you that I will try to find a middle path on Did I even break any promise earlier? ] (]) 14:51, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
| style = background: #f8eaba
::See ] for the edit warring policy. You didn't break 3RR. but you tried to force your views into the article by steadily reverting over a long period. The DS alert notifies you that admins can take quick action on edits in the area of India, Pakistan and Afghanistan if they see people are not editing according to policy. You should be careful to follow policy in the future. Thank you, ] (]) 15:07, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
| image = ]
::: ], I tried to talk on talkpage. I also agreed to solve the dispute. This is very depressing for me now. I didn't break any rule. I am still saying that you unblock me and I will try to reach consensus on Article's talk page. Heavens will not fall if you unblock me. This will generate more animosity between editors. This is not the way. I have tried to talk on talkpage. ] (]) 15:14, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
| text = '''''This account has been ] indefinitely''''' as a ]&#32;of&#32;{{user21|Siddheart}}&#32;that was created to violate Misplaced Pages policy. Note that using multiple accounts is ], but using them for ] reasons '''is not''', and that all edits made while evading a block or ban ]. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include "tlx|". -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;}} below. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 07:39, 2 July 2017 (UTC)<!-- Template:SockBlock -->}}
::::I am not planning to lift your block, but you can use the {{tlx|unblock}} template here on your talk page and other admins will be able to review your request. See ]. ] (]) 15:25, 2 February 2016 (UTC)


{{unblock reviewed | 1=Please unblock me. The reason behind this is that '''truly I am not Siddheart'''. Siddheart is a different person whom I know personally through Faceboook. His original name is Siddhartha. He actually convinced me to edit Misplaced Pages and make some edits and so I did. I followed his edits on Misplaced Pages and was blocked for a suspected sock-puppetry as reported. I have no other words to say rather than to speak the truth. I can even disclose the personal conversation that took place between me and Siddheart. Whether you believe it or not, its up to you. If you want to decline my unblock request then you should should at least remove the tag of suspected sock-puppet of Siddheart as I am not Siddheart. I am just asking the concerned admin to give me a chance to edit Misplaced Pages. Thank you. ] (]) 11:14, 12 December 2017 (UTC) | decline = You seem to be admitting that you did indeed edit on Siddheart's suggestion. That's a violation of ] and indicates the block is appropriate. ] (]) 11:47, 12 December 2017 (UTC)}}
== Unblock request. ==




{{unblock reviewed | 1=], yes this could be a violation of Misplaced Pages policy on my part as I wasn't aware of this when I started editing Misplaced Pages on the call of Siddheart. Please forgive me for that as I wasn't conscious or aware about it that it could be ]. After his call, I edited willingly to improve the Misplaced Pages. As for now, I just want to edit Misplaced Pages without the invitation of any other Wikipedian user. So from now onward, there will not be '''any violation of ]'''. So for this reason, I request you to kindly Unblock me. ] (]) 13:26, 12 December 2017 (UTC) ] (]) 10:13, 13 December 2017 (UTC) | decline = It is very likely that this is just another made-up story to get unblocked, your behavior here irrespective of the socking issue has been disruptive and the block should stand on that alone, however, the fact that your behavior coincides with that of the sockmaster just adds to the reason for the block. If these sort of frivolous unblock requests continue then your talk page access will also be revoked. &mdash;]''']''' 11:11, 13 December 2017 (UTC)}}
{{unblock|reason= ], I tried to talk on talkpage. I also agreed to solve the dispute. This is very depressing for me now. I didn't break any rule. I am still saying that you unblock me and I will try to reach consensus on Article's talk page. Heavens will not fall if you unblock me. This will generate more animosity between editors. This is not the way. I have tried to talk on talkpage. ] (]) 15:38, 2 February 2016 (UTC)}}.

Latest revision as of 05:07, 28 February 2023


Archives
Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Some stroopwafels for you!

Hey Terabar. Welcome back; I hope you've learned enough now. Remember: WP:TRUTH. All the best, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 10:48, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks User: Joshua Jonathan. But what do you want to convey from this if you you were to express this advice in a single line? Huh? Terabar (talk) 12:14, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Just this: don't get hooked again. When your sense of justice is being offended, you run in to defend what you deem right. Well, you may be right, but you'll need good sources to make your point. And then, still: WP:TRUTH. Criticism of Hinduism is just not worth it. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 17:13, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Noticeboard Incidents

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Southeast Asian religion: disruptive forumshopping. Ivanvector (/Edits) 15:17, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Blocked

I've blocked you for 72 hours for personal attacks, disruptive editing, and repeated false allegations of socking despite being warned. Calling allegations "opinion" or "suspicious" is sophistry and pretense. If you persist in this behavior after your block expires, you risk being blocked for considerably longer.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:32, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

June 2017

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Misplaced Pages accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Siddheart. Thank you. Marvellous Spider-Man 06:05, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Siddheart (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Misplaced Pages policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:39, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Terabar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me. The reason behind this is that truly I am not Siddheart. Siddheart is a different person whom I know personally through Faceboook. His original name is Siddhartha. He actually convinced me to edit Misplaced Pages and make some edits and so I did. I followed his edits on Misplaced Pages and was blocked for a suspected sock-puppetry as reported. I have no other words to say rather than to speak the truth. I can even disclose the personal conversation that took place between me and Siddheart. Whether you believe it or not, its up to you. If you want to decline my unblock request then you should should at least remove the tag of suspected sock-puppet of Siddheart as I am not Siddheart. I am just asking the concerned admin to give me a chance to edit Misplaced Pages. Thank you. Terabar (talk) 11:14, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You seem to be admitting that you did indeed edit on Siddheart's suggestion. That's a violation of WP:MEAT and indicates the block is appropriate. Yamla (talk) 11:47, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Terabar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User: Yamla, yes this could be a violation of Misplaced Pages policy on my part as I wasn't aware of this when I started editing Misplaced Pages on the call of Siddheart. Please forgive me for that as I wasn't conscious or aware about it that it could be WP: MEAT. After his call, I edited willingly to improve the Misplaced Pages. As for now, I just want to edit Misplaced Pages without the invitation of any other Wikipedian user. So from now onward, there will not be any violation of WP: MEAT. So for this reason, I request you to kindly Unblock me. Terabar (talk) 13:26, 12 December 2017 (UTC) Terabar (talk) 10:13, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It is very likely that this is just another made-up story to get unblocked, your behavior here irrespective of the socking issue has been disruptive and the block should stand on that alone, however, the fact that your behavior coincides with that of the sockmaster just adds to the reason for the block. If these sort of frivolous unblock requests continue then your talk page access will also be revoked. —SpacemanSpiff 11:11, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.