Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Jake Olson (photographer): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:39, 25 February 2016 editJuliancolton (talk | contribs)Administrators130,415 editsm Reverted edits by 70.97.236.128 (talk) to last version by Seicer← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:44, 13 February 2023 edit undoSheepLinterBot (talk | contribs)Bots50,297 editsm fix font tags linter errorsTag: AWB 
(8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->


The result was '''delete. Blatant self promotion. Non-notable photographer who was in the news recently for telling others to commit suicide/self promoting his vehicles. No credibly noted; no independent/non-promotional sources.''' <small>] &#x007C; ] &#x007C; ]</small> 21:01, 24 February 2016 (UTC) The result was '''delete. Blatant self promotion. Non-notable photographer who was in the news recently for telling others to commit suicide/self promoting his vehicles. No credibly noted; no independent/non-promotional sources.''' <small>] &#x007C; ] &#x007C; ]</small> 21:01, 24 February 2016 (UTC)


===]=== ===]===
Line 16: Line 16:


Subject appears to not be notable, per ]. ] (]) 02:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC) Subject appears to not be notable, per ]. ] (]) 02:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <span style="border:2px solid #090E0E;padding:0px;"><font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#000000;">]</font>] </span> 03:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)</small> :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <span style="border:2px solid #090E0E;padding:0px;">]] </span> 03:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <span style="border:2px solid #090E0E;padding:0px;"><font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#000000;">]</font>] </span> 03:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)</small> :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <span style="border:2px solid #090E0E;padding:0px;">]] </span> 03:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <span style="border:2px solid #090E0E;padding:0px;"><font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#000000;">]</font>] </span> 03:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)</small> :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <span style="border:2px solid #090E0E;padding:0px;">]] </span> 03:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)</small>
* '''Delete'''; Appears to be more self-promotional than anything else. I can't find much information about the subject aside from Facebook page, and main website, not much else. ] (]) 09:48, 22 February 2016 (UTC) * '''Delete'''; Appears to be more self-promotional than anything else. I can't find much information about the subject aside from Facebook page, and main website, not much else. ] (]) 09:48, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
* '''Delete'''; I can’t find any non-promotional source on the subject. ] (]) 09:48, 22 February 2016 (UTC) * '''Delete'''; I can’t find any non-promotional source on the subject. ] (]) 09:48, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Line 25: Line 25:
DELETE!!! DELETE!!!
* '''Delete'''; This article is a self-promoting advertisement. I could also write an autobiographical article about my photography and the multiple awards I've won, but it never crossed my mind because I don't have a business to promote. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:14, 22 February 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> * '''Delete'''; This article is a self-promoting advertisement. I could also write an autobiographical article about my photography and the multiple awards I've won, but it never crossed my mind because I don't have a business to promote. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:14, 22 February 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
{{collapse top|Policy based discussions are appreciated and not personal attacks—] <sup>]</sup> 16:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)}} {{collapse top|Policy based discussions are appreciated and not personal attacks—] ] 16:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)}}
'''Delete''' '''Delete'''
Using wikipedia as self-promotion, also a douche. Using wikipedia as self-promotion, also a douche.
Line 50: Line 50:
{{collapse bottom}} {{collapse bottom}}
* '''Delete''' Seems 100% like self promotion by the subject of the article. - ] (]) 16:28, 22 February 2016 (UTC) * '''Delete''' Seems 100% like self promotion by the subject of the article. - ] (]) 16:28, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' Subject is not notable per ]. ]|] 16:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC) * '''Delete''' Subject is not notable per ]. ]|] 16:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' - Per ] and ]. Most sources I found were promotional, and didn't appear to be independent of the subject. There are a few sources that do meet ], but not nearly enough to satisfy the requirement for ''significant coverage'' per ]. ]<sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 18:07, 22 February 2016 (UTC) * '''Delete''' - Per ] and ]. Most sources I found were promotional, and didn't appear to be independent of the subject. There are a few sources that do meet ], but not nearly enough to satisfy the requirement for ''significant coverage'' per ]. ]<sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 18:07, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' Completely self promotional. ] (]) 20:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC * '''Delete''' Completely self promotional. ] (]) 20:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC
Line 59: Line 59:
* '''Delete''' Misplaced Pages is not an advertising venue. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 08:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> * '''Delete''' Misplaced Pages is not an advertising venue. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 08:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
*While the author of this page could have been Jake Olson himself or someone hired to write it, it's important to point out the recent outrage wave towards Olson. Deleting this page can be an small victory fort people who are aware of Olson behavior but for potential clients and collaborators is imperative that they know the kind of person Olson is, while "contributions of the world of art" are a great PR strategy this can never hide the real human being behind his despicable attitude -- ] (]) 09:36, 23 February 2016 (UTC) *While the author of this page could have been Jake Olson himself or someone hired to write it, it's important to point out the recent outrage wave towards Olson. Deleting this page can be an small victory fort people who are aware of Olson behavior but for potential clients and collaborators is imperative that they know the kind of person Olson is, while "contributions of the world of art" are a great PR strategy this can never hide the real human being behind his despicable attitude -- ] (]) 09:36, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
::Don't worry, whether the article is deleted or not will depend solely upon how well the article meets the requirements of Misplaced Pages's guidelines, especially those guidelines addressed in this discussion. --<span style="outline:1px dotted #d1bfa4;"><font color="#ffffff">&#124;</font> ] &#124; ] <font color="#ffffff">&#124;</font></span> 12:23, 23 February 2016 (UTC) ::Don't worry, whether the article is deleted or not will depend solely upon how well the article meets the requirements of Misplaced Pages's guidelines, especially those guidelines addressed in this discussion. --<span style="outline:1px dotted #d1bfa4;"><span style="color:#ffffff;">&#124;</span> ] &#124; ] <span style="color:#ffffff;">&#124;</span></span> 12:23, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' if we can all create pages about ourselves, i'd like one! as a budding photographer (who treats people better than this guy (i don't even know who he is, so he's clearly not as famous as he thinks)) i'd like a page about myself!! so can i create one? haha! how long before this does get decided for deletion, or not? ] (]) 20:43, 23 February 2016 (UTC) * '''Delete''' if we can all create pages about ourselves, i'd like one! as a budding photographer (who treats people better than this guy (i don't even know who he is, so he's clearly not as famous as he thinks)) i'd like a page about myself!! so can i create one? haha! how long before this does get decided for deletion, or not? ] (]) 20:43, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' -- page driven by Facebook controversy and sole Forbes listing (which is questionable given their platforming); seems self-promotional and self-referential. ] (]) 22:49, 23 February 2016 (UTC) *'''Delete''' -- page driven by Facebook controversy and sole Forbes listing (which is questionable given their platforming); seems self-promotional and self-referential. ] (]) 22:49, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Line 70: Line 70:


{{clear}} {{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 23:44, 13 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Blatant self promotion. Non-notable photographer who was in the news recently for telling others to commit suicide/self promoting his vehicles. No credibly noted; no independent/non-promotional sources. seicer | talk | contribs 21:01, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Jake Olson (photographer)

Not a voteIf you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Misplaced Pages contributors. Misplaced Pages has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.
Jake Olson (photographer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparent autobiographical advertisement page created and edited by subject (new user, only contributions are creating and editing this article). Appears to not be notable; references consist mainly of being listed in several "socially influential photographers" lists, blogs and a self-published biography.

Subject of article appears to not have received significant coverage in reliable sources independent of subject; the article appears to have been created as a promotional tool by the subject. Article is supported mainly by self-published sources (not recommended per BLP guidelines).

Subject appears to not be notable, per WP:BIO. atomicthumbs‽ (talk) 02:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  03:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  03:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  03:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

DELETE!!!

  • Delete; This article is a self-promoting advertisement. I could also write an autobiographical article about my photography and the multiple awards I've won, but it never crossed my mind because I don't have a business to promote. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasonracey (talkcontribs) 16:14, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Policy based discussions are appreciated and not personal attacks—UY Scuti 16:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Delete Using wikipedia as self-promotion, also a douche.

Subject of article is a narcissistic, colossal douchebag.

Delete him

-I second that motion! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.84.236.24 (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Subject of article is a waste of space, uses wikipedia to shame others. Delete.15.195.185.84 (talk) 15:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

This person has not made any notable contributions above and beyond the THOUSANDS of other photographers floating around. Please consider deleting this entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.90.11.237 (talk) 15:44, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

this guy is a huge chode. Delete- not a good artist and not a good person.

This is clearly a page he created for self promotion.

Delete Artist has created this page as a way to promote himself and shame others on the internet.

References

  1. https://i.imgur.com/x1LRoxT.jpg
Don't worry, whether the article is deleted or not will depend solely upon how well the article meets the requirements of Misplaced Pages's guidelines, especially those guidelines addressed in this discussion. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 12:23, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.