Revision as of 01:37, 20 August 2006 editSue Anne (talk | contribs)13,185 edits →Problems with edits to [] article: comment← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:13, 15 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
(153 intermediate revisions by 34 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{User EX-WP}} | |||
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" id="talkheader" align="center" style="text-align:center;background-color: #FFFFFF;" | |||
<!--User:CSDWarnBot--> | |||
|- | |||
== Leaving Wipedia == | |||
! colspan="2" style="border-bottom:1px solid #C0C090; background-color: #F8EABA;" | | |||
This is the ] for ''"]"''. | |||
|- | |||
| style="background-color: #FFFFFF;text-align:left;" | | |||
All talk regarding about me and my edits should be directed here. I prefer concise messages. The only rule I have is to keep your discussions/messages as clean as possible. I need to know right away if an article that I have either edited/deleted/moved might cause any link discrepancies. Please let me know about it and I'll rectify it with the fullest extent of my strength at the shortest time possible. | |||
I noticed. Sorry to see you go. I think you did good editing work, as long as it didn't require you to deal with other editors. Maybe you should just take time off and see what happens at the arbitration case, before you decide to leave permanently.--] (]) 13:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
'''It is VERY IMPORTANT to sign your comments using four tildes (<code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>).''' Please use the "Plus" link right of the "Edit This Page" tab to start a new thread. | |||
:I am leaving Misplaced Pages <u>without any strings attached</u>. Officially, and '''FOR GOOD'''. — '''''Mark Kim''''' (] * ] * ]) 15:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| style="background-color: #FFFFFF;" | | |||
<div style="border: 1px solid #C0C090; background-color: #F8EABA; margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-right: 3px;"> | |||
''']''' | |||
== Sorry but I'm adios == | |||
Please respect ], ] and ]. | |||
</div> | |||
|} | |||
Page last archived by '''''Vesther''''' (] * ] * ]) 04:24, 26 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Sorry but after 2 years, I'm voluntarily adios. The fact that you got involved in a conspiracy to place me under arbitration is the last straw. Therefore go to another editor if you want various articles to be edited. I don't have any time to waste with Misplaced Pages anymore. I leave Misplaced Pages with this one warning: there will be even more fragile editors like myself and soon there will be opposition to Misplaced Pages's oppresive rules that y'all will have to think things. I don't care about those articles anymore and nobody cared about my edits anyway. Sorry, but I'm voluntarily finished here. — '''''Mark Kim''''' (] * ] * ]) 12:57, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
*] | |||
:I think that last message is very telling of what exactly is wrong with your attitude... There's no conspiracy nor are we, or have we ever, tried to oppress your content on Misplaced Pages articles. If anything, your edits to the articles were more than good for most editors I've seen around here. The entire point of all this was to get you to recognize that you are not the only person on Misplaced Pages and therefore you need to interact more respectfully with others. That's it. Somehow you keep seeing this as an attack on your edits but it seriously isn't... not remotely. What rule did you exactly find so oppressive? How have we treated you in a mean or vindictive manner? In either case, life will move on here with you here or not, no need for such warnings of doom. ''']''' ]|] 15:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
*] | |||
:I explicitly stated that it wasn't an attack. I'm only trying to lend a hand in solving the problem. You're a good editor; just have a bad attitude. — ] <sup><i>(])</i></sup> 18:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
*Dead Discussions ] | |||
::Vesther, you're one of the editors I look up to. You've been contributing to '']'' articles and I've learned a thing or two from it. Actually, a lot more than that. I hope you'll change your mind and come back, because you're one of the Wikipedians that make up Misplaced Pages. --] 23:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
== re Sennheiser == | |||
I don't know why you decided that I have a beef with Sennheiser as a whole and not the Sennheiser article. I love Sennheiser products, and have found them to design the most comfortable headphones I've ever worn. I have no problem with editing as I see fit either, but I've found that asking about things in place already tends to give me more information on deciding if and/or how to edit something. Like I said in its talk page, I wasn't trying to be facetious.] 05:18, 4 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
:The only reason why I was inquiring was because you had some NPOV issues with the article, that's all. Try not to panic, as I'm just curious. — '''''Vesther''''' (] * ] * ]) 10:49, 4 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Hope to see you Soon! == | |||
== ] == | |||
Sorry to see you go! After all its nice to have someone watch my back when I needed some help! I hope you don't mind but I put the Barnstar I gave you back on your user page... Since I think you still deserve it :-) Your pal Phoenix! -- ] 05:16, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Problems with edits to ] article == | |||
==Redirect of ]== | |||
* Manual of style -- Please review the manual of style, especially when it comes to headings or the start of bullets. Things like "Initial Boardroom" should be "Initial boardroom". Also, on some of these fan articles, we do tend to use first names for the contestants, but Trump shouldn't be changed to Mr. Trump. | |||
]Hello, this is a message from ]. A tag has been placed on ], by {{#ifeq:{{{nom}}}|1|] (] '''·''' ]),}} another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be ] from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because ] is a redirect to a non-existent page (]). <br><br>To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting ], please affix the template <nowiki>{{hangon}}</nowiki> to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at ]. Feel free to contact the ] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself.''' ] 08:10, 30 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
* Many of your edits, in my opinion, cross the line when it comes to cruft and throwing in your opinions and/or personal wording to things (aka "original research"). I've been trying to clean these up and source everything as much as possible. You don't need to rewrite everything. I have agreed with some criticism of you in the past that you tend to think you ] the articles that you work on, and often I don't think your edits make the article better from an encyclopaedic standpoint. | |||
--] 20:30, 19 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
:: Vesther, your message on my talk page is a prime example of what I feel is wrong with your edits on the Apprentice article. | |||
::* You said - ''The reason why I capitalize descriptions (i.e. Initial Boardroom) is because when you describe bulleting and bold it (i.e. This bullet vs. This Bullet) with a colon, it needs to be as much attention-grabbing as possible. IMO I really don't think "This bullet" would be much of an attention-grabber. I'm not gonna debate on the capitalization conventions here.'' | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
::* The ] says -- ''Capitalise the first letter of the first word and any proper nouns in headings, but leave the rest lower case. Thus "Rules and regulations", not "Rules and Regulations".'' | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691991546 --> | |||
::* Your opinion is trumped (excuse the pun) by established Misplaced Pages policy. If you feel that the capital letters should be used, then you need to get policy changed ... not violate policy where you see fit. This is not my opinion, but the consensus of Misplaced Pages editors. | |||
:: When it comes to Rebecca and the "not hired" / "fired" debacle, to be honest I really didn't care which way it went, but I was sick of the edit wars that were going on. Again, the consensus of those that participated in the discussion went again your personal opinion. Your habit of bringing that decision into every discussion just goes to prove the idea that you think you ] the article. | |||
:: --] 01:37, 20 August 2006 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 17:13, 15 February 2023
This editor has decided to leave Misplaced Pages. |
Leaving Wipedia
I noticed. Sorry to see you go. I think you did good editing work, as long as it didn't require you to deal with other editors. Maybe you should just take time off and see what happens at the arbitration case, before you decide to leave permanently.--Atlan (talk) 13:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- I am leaving Misplaced Pages without any strings attached. Officially, and FOR GOOD. — Mark Kim (U * T/R * CTD) 15:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Sorry but I'm adios
Sorry but after 2 years, I'm voluntarily adios. The fact that you got involved in a conspiracy to place me under arbitration is the last straw. Therefore go to another editor if you want various articles to be edited. I don't have any time to waste with Misplaced Pages anymore. I leave Misplaced Pages with this one warning: there will be even more fragile editors like myself and soon there will be opposition to Misplaced Pages's oppresive rules that y'all will have to think things. I don't care about those articles anymore and nobody cared about my edits anyway. Sorry, but I'm voluntarily finished here. — Mark Kim (U * T/R * CTD) 12:57, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- I think that last message is very telling of what exactly is wrong with your attitude... There's no conspiracy nor are we, or have we ever, tried to oppress your content on Misplaced Pages articles. If anything, your edits to the articles were more than good for most editors I've seen around here. The entire point of all this was to get you to recognize that you are not the only person on Misplaced Pages and therefore you need to interact more respectfully with others. That's it. Somehow you keep seeing this as an attack on your edits but it seriously isn't... not remotely. What rule did you exactly find so oppressive? How have we treated you in a mean or vindictive manner? In either case, life will move on here with you here or not, no need for such warnings of doom. Sasquatch t|c 15:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- I explicitly stated that it wasn't an attack. I'm only trying to lend a hand in solving the problem. You're a good editor; just have a bad attitude. — Selmo 18:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- Vesther, you're one of the editors I look up to. You've been contributing to The Apprentice articles and I've learned a thing or two from it. Actually, a lot more than that. I hope you'll change your mind and come back, because you're one of the Wikipedians that make up Misplaced Pages. --Sli723 23:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Hope to see you Soon!
Sorry to see you go! After all its nice to have someone watch my back when I needed some help! I hope you don't mind but I put the Barnstar I gave you back on your user page... Since I think you still deserve it :-) Your pal Phoenix! -- UKPhoenix79 05:16, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Redirect of VSSE
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on VSSE, by another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because VSSE is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting VSSE, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 08:10, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)