Misplaced Pages

User talk:Kautilya3: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:28, 1 March 2016 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by Huhshyeh - "Vandalism - Komati Caste: More Vandalism from Kautilya3"← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:44, 24 December 2024 edit undoKautilya3 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers86,342 edits Happy holidays!: Reply 
Line 2: Line 2:
| algo = old(15d) | algo = old(15d)
| archive = User talk:Kautilya3/Archives/Archive %(counter)d | archive = User talk:Kautilya3/Archives/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 4 | counter = 20
| maxarchivesize = 150K | maxarchivesize = 150K
| archiveheader = {{Aan}} | archiveheader = {{Aan}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 | minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 3 | minthreadsleft = 8
}} }}
{{DS/aware|ipa|muh-im|a-i}}
{{Archive box {{Archive box
|auto=yes |auto=yes
Line 13: Line 14:
|search=yes |search=yes
}} }}
<!--
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
|archiveprefix=User talk:Kautilya3/Archives/
|format= %%i
|age=2160
|archivebox=no
|maxarchsize=80000
|box-separator=no
|minkeepthreads=8
}} -->


== Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment ==
== Was this a mistake? ==


]Your feedback is requested &#32;at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact ]. &#124; Sent at 16:30, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
or have I missed something?


== On Sanskrit inscriptions in a mosque ==
== Vandalism - Komati Caste ==


You might like . ] (]) 16:36, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi Kautilya,


== Kautilya ==
References have been given to every sentence in-spite of this how can you delete the article?


I ginally understand, I think, why you use the name "Kautilya." I always wondered why you would use a reference to a 'prime minister' of Chandragupta, but it's a reference to encyclopedic collecting and compiling information. Regards, ] - ] 16:39, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Is this what you want to do with Misplaced Pages a great source of information when references are also given.


== A barnstar for you! ==
Is it fair that you haven't even gone through the references cited and just remove or vandalise a page and just keep couple sentences as the article. Is this the way to go about it?


{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
Let's discuss before you want to revert it. OK.
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | When you see an unnecessary block, you defend the affected user. When you see a need for help, you provide advice. You discuss edits with newer editors, explain possible issues with them and implement changes after highly constructive discussion. You do these things in your free time for other volunteers and the encyclopedia. I'm not sure if "random" is the right term, but these are acts of kindness you deserve a barnstar for. ] (]) 19:25, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
|}


:Wow! Thank you {{U|ToBeFree}}. I am blushing... :-) -- ] (]) 19:32, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Reg,


== Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment ==
Wise Wik <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 13:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


]Your feedback is requested &#32;at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact ]. &#124; Sent at 15:30, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
: Sorry, it was inadvertant. The rollback button picked up all the edits you had done in sequence. Nevertheless, there are problems with almost all your edits. Please continue the discussion on the article talk page. - ] (]) 14:50, 7 February 2016 (UTC)


== . ==
Kautilya, the edits to the article is as per the reference cited and have given comments for every edit mentioning the same. Request you to please check them before removing the edits. As per the edits I have only reinstated what is mentioned as per the references cited. Why is the same being reverted would this not be called edit warring? and rather the privileges of such editors be revoked here? And again why is sourced content being modified here. I have clearly mentioned the reference as well as the reason for the edit in the edit summary for all my edits under the heading "Edit Summary". The reference cites Komatis to be present in Maharashtra and will repaste the same reference that you yourself have sourced and cited (BTW looks deliberate as there is inclusion of minor incidents that reference to riots and other inciteful content between communities which serve no informative purpose here) To further reason, why should any incident involving another community that occurred during the British Era in a particular time limited to George Town which is nothing but a nook and corner incident, even find mention here? and again I have only included only the sourced content from the same reference provided then why is it removed and pasted in bits? as if to incite people or communities further? I checked further and found these to be included by user Kautilya and is of surprise to me here as I didn't expect this from Misplaced Pages editors as I held user Kautilya in good esteem.


{{You've got mail}} ] (]) 16:13, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Again it clearly mentions riots happened when business contracts alluded Komatis and Balijia Naidus who were first to riot with Beri Chettiars which forced the British to apportion commercial and residential areas of George Town.


== Edit Request for Audrey truschke ==
My edit cites the same here below is the reference" https://books.google.co.in/books?id=imh4AgAAQBAJ&pg=PT142&lpg=PT142&dq=komati+caste&source=bl&ots=UPEt8nWzsh&sig=dLRi4_vSSASbrRCjU_mZ3_EZoEY&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwialpWjjIHLAhUGcI4KHRXAAFA4ChDoAQg_MAc#v=onepage&q=komati&f=false"


Hi! I am proposing a new edit request for Audrey truschke. This edit will include an author named girish shahane who issued a critique of her work on aurangzeb. This seems like a legitimate edit since the review was published in a reputable indian news outlet called scroll in.
Mines, Mattison (1992), "Individuality and Achievement in South Indian Social History", Modern Asian Studies 26 (1): 129–156, JSTOR 312720


https://scroll.in/article/856178/aurangzeb-was-a-bigot-not-just-by-our-standards-but-by-those-of-his-predecessors-and-peers
Also finally let's not discredit the origins of Gomathi for the alternate origins mentioned by authors during British times and exclude the importance of contemporary authors and keep both of them. Mentioning Gomathi as "one theory" seems to discredit the same, hence I have mentioned both the accepted and alternate theory about British authors during the Raj. I also checked further information and also found that the Author is from the same community and hence it's of obvious credence. Also the same that the word Komati to have its origins in Gomathi is mentioned in government journals which cannot be rubbished away.


I really don't see why this can't be used as a valid critique even if the critique isn't is a historian. I'm just wondering why criticism has to come from only a historian for it to be valid. Can it not come from a reputable news outlet? Hope to hear from you thanks............... ] (]) 00:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Regards,


:Academic works get academic reviews, published in journals. They get a lot higher weightage than those published in news outlets. History is a very ancient subject dating back to Herodotus and Aristotle. There is a long tradition of how to assess historical data, which scholarly historians follow. Popular historians know nothing about it. -- ] (]) 13:37, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
--WiseWik (talk) 18:11, 18 February 2016 (UTC)WiseWik <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Season's Greetings ==


{| style="border:2px ; background-color: #FFF7E6;"
== Vandalism and Blanking on RSS page by Kautilya3 ==
|rowspan="2" valign="right" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2; vertical-align: left; height: 1.1em;" | '''Season's Greetings'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | <blockquote>When he took up his hat to go, he gave one long look round the library. Then he turned ... (and Saxon took advantage of this to wag his way in and join the party), and said, "It's a rare privilege, the free entry of a book chamber like this. I'm hoping ... that you are not insensible of it." </blockquote>


(Text on page 17 illustrated in the ] in ]'s ''Mary's Meadow and Other Tales of Fields and Flowers'', illustrated by ], London: G. Bell and Sons, 1915.)
As seen above with your vandalism post on Komati Caste, it seems you are quite used to blanking out edit from other WP editors to further your cause. Clearly the blanking out from you at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Rashtriya_Swayamsevak_Sangh&oldid=707598486 wherein both Kumar and Gandhi's reference of the RSS, is clearly biased. It reiterates the fact of the RSS being absent in the freedom struggle and siding with the British Raj when India needed independence; this fact already mentioned in the same page some sections prior.


]] 04:50, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
So in no way, you can revert this, Kautilya3, unless ofcourse you are a "bhakt" itself, promoting the fascist thrice banned organisation, the RSS <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 11:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
|}
: Thank you {{U|Fowler&fowler}}. What a lovely greeting! Happy holidays for you too! -- ] (]) 15:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC)


== Happy holidays! ==
== Indian Left now Cheering Various Terrorists ==


{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
Indian Left has reached the bottom of the barrel. Can you imagine westerners cheering Osama Bin Laden? See .<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 21:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
: You expect me to stop reading ] and watch Arnab Goswami talk shows instead? You are out of your mind! - ] (]) 21:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Happy holidays!'''
::You can read and watch at the same time. <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 21:11, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
|-
::: If this was about Afzal Guru, he was an Indian Kashmiri separatist. So there is no comparison with Bin Laden, who never belonged anywhere here. I notice that Arnab Goswami got only worse than the last time I watched him. - ] (]) 11:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Wishing you a Merry Christmas filled with love and joy, a Happy Holiday season surrounded by warmth and laughter, and a New Year brimming with hope, happiness, and success! 🎄🎉✨ ] (]) 10:56, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
{{od}} Dude, Afzal Guru attacked the parliament of India. Wow.<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 22:33, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
|}
: Yup, he was still an Indian, not Osama. - ] (]) 22:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
: Thank you {{U|Jannatulbaqi}}. Happy holidays to you too! Let us hope that 2025 will be better than this year has been! -- ] (]) 15:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
::Jihadis don't consider themselves Indian.<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 23:42, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
::: The Indian Supreme Court got him executed. That makes him Indian. He considers himself Kashmiri, and Kashmir is part of India. That also makes him Indian. You can't have it both ways. - ] (]) 00:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
::::Do you agree he is a terrorist? yes or no?<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 00:45, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
::::: Yes. But what I think is irrelevant. I am not the one protesting. (Some section of) the JNU students support Kashimri separatists, let us say. That have every right to do so. You can't brand them as traitors for dissenting. The only right India has on Kashmir is based on its liberalism and secularism. If both of them are gone, then Kashmir is gone too. - ] (]) 00:58, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
::::::Its not liberal or secular to cheer terrorists. Whether its Britain, America or India.<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 01:05, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
::::::: Bhagat Singh was a terrorist too. One man's terrorist can be another's freedom fighter. He was tried and executed for his terrorism. But still his cause might and will find support among others. That goes with the territory. If they support the cause that doesn't mean they are supporting terrorism. - ] (]) 01:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
::::::::Its not liberal or secular to cheer Jihadi terrrorists.<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 01:26, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
::::::::: Right, let us put in prison everybody that cheers for Bhagat Singh. - ] (]) 01:28, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
::::::::::Anyone who cheers for Jihadi terrorists should be sent to Guantanamo Bay or CIA black site.<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 01:36, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
::::::::::: And thereby produce an ISIS inside the Mother India. - ] (]) 01:39, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
::::::::::::Congress Party allowed Saudis to propagate Salafism in India, the doctrine of ISIS.<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 01:43, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

== Reference errors on 16 February ==

] Hello, I'm ]. I have '''automatically detected''' that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. {{#ifeq:1|1|It is|They are}} as follows:
*On the ] page, caused an ] <small>(])</small>. ( | )
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a ], you can .
Thanks, <!-- User:ReferenceBot/inform -->] (]) 00:27, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

== Please comment on ] ==

The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 40924 --> ] (]) 04:27, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

== India will be gone in 50 years ==

India will be gone in 50 years<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 18:11, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
: You think it will last that long? - ] (]) 22:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
::{{Yo|VictoriaGrayson}} & Kautilya, Why is this pessimism? This NATION is living on for more than 5000 years.

1) "In a world in which ancient ], ], and ] have all vanished without trace<br>
Our own attributes (name and sign) live on today.

There is something about our existence for it doesn't get wiped <br>
Even though, for centuries, the time-cycle of the world has been our enemy."

(''Yūnān o-Miṣr o-Rūmā, sab miṭ ga'e jahān&#x331; se''<br>
'''''Ab tak magar hai bāqī,''' '''nām o-nis&#x331;h&#x331;an&#x331; hamārā'''''

'''''Kuch bāt hai kih hastī, miṭtī nahīn&#x331; hamārī'''''<br>
''Ṣadiyon&#x331; rahā hai dus&#x331;h&#x331;man daur-i zamān&#x331; hamārā'')

2) Tagore-<blockquote> I pronounced the victory in ''Jana Gana Mana'' of that Bhagya Vidhata (God of Destiny) of India who has from age after age held steadfast the reins of India's chariot through rise and fall, through the straight path and the curved.</blockquote>

3) Nehru-<blockquote>"India is a geographical and economic entity, a cultural unity amidst diversity, a bundle of contradictions held together by strong but invisible threads. About her there is the elusive quality of a legend of long ago; some enchantment seems to have held her mind. She is a myth and an idea, a dream and a vision, and yet very real and present and pervasive." </blockquote>

4) Swami Vivekananda- <blockquote>" I see in my mind's eye the future perfect India rising out of this chaos and strife, glorious and invincible." </blockquote>

I am an eternal optimist. Our country is eternally secured.] (]) 11:04, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

: Hi Ghatus, if you understand mathematics a little bit, you would know the idea of "exponential growth," where roughly speaking things double every few years. When you have processes that grow exponentially, the past is a poor indicator of the future. The American public thinks global warming is a myth because they see the past as a predictor of the future. But we produce enough green house gases in 5 years (say) as we did in the entire history of the planet. In India, similarly, there is a reluctance to understand the exponential growth of Hindu nationalism. "We have been ok, so we will be ok." Mathematics says that is false reasoning. We produce as many fanatics in 5 years (say) as we did in the entire history. Nobody knows what will happen. - ] (]) 12:02, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
::The problem is Islam, not Hindu nationalism.<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 14:41, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
::: Same difference! - ] (]) 15:04, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
{{ping|Ghatus}}, read ''Breaking India'' by Rajiv Malhotra.<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 16:21, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
: Talking about Islam, how come nobody has bothered to create a decent page on ], the supposed equivalent of ]? - ] (]) 23:55, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
::All global Sunni terrorism is 1 network. Osama bin Laden was living in Pakistan for example.<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 00:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
::: Oh, well. Then let us delete the ] page. What is the point? - ] (]) 00:35, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
:Though I myself is born in a Hindu Brahmin family, I consider "rationalism" as my religion. We will have to stop the rise of "UNREASON"- be it of any community. Actually, one communalism feeds the other communialism as they are complement to each other. As a history student, I see the fall of Congress as the result of its compromise on the ideal of "real" pluralism (secularism) and the rise of BJP as a successful exploitation of the contradictions in the "so called Congressi secular narrative of post independent India". To me, today's Hindutva force is a reactionary force - a reaction to post 70's congressi hypocrisy on pluralism. And like all reactionary forces, Hindutva generally focuses on both "racial masculinity" and "patriotic nationalism". If one wants to fight sectarianism, he has to take both - Hindu extremism and Islamic fundamentalism - head on. Being soft or hard on only one will eventually encourage the other.] (]) 05:42, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
:: I think our own page on ] is woefully silent on the "congressi hypocricy." - ] (]) 14:03, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
:: Also, terms like "communalism," "extremism," and "fundamentalism" are simplistic Leftist mumbo-jumbo which sidestep the real issues. Is Kashmiri separatism "Islamic fundamentalism?" Is claiming "Kashmir is an integral part of India" Hindu "extremism?" We need real debate on real issues. In a way, the JNU started precisely that. Let us not oversimplify things. - ] (]) 15:56, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
:Kashmir seperatism is merely a part of global Sunni terrorism. Watch BBC documentary called Pakistan Doublecross.<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 16:01, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
:: That may be so. But the Hindu nationalists don't do a thing to fight the global terrorism. They are paper tigers who take out their frustrations on the neighbourhood Indians. - ] (]) 16:50, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
:::Hindu nationalism is a term of ]. Edwin Bryant can be "agnostic" about Aryan Migration and not be termed a Hindu nationalist. Whites like David Gordon White can trace Vedas to Indus Valley Civilization without being called Hindu nationalist.<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 18:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

== Please comment on ] ==

The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 41126 --> ] (]) 04:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

== Discretionary sanctions ==

Hi Kautilya, the DS alert on F&F’s page is completely unnecessary and only serves to escalate what is otherwise just a simple content dispute. I’m sure they are aware of the existing Arbcom sanctions, so I’ve removed it for now. If you feel strongly about it, you are welcome to restore it. Thanks. ] (]) 10:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
: Well, we all get the ARBIPA notice sooner or later. But I will let it be for now. Thanks. - ] (]) 11:06, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

== Kashmiri pandits ==

There was no tangible evidence that Kashmiri pandits women were used as sex slaves. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 01:27, 25 February 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Ok, why are you telling me this? - ] (]) 08:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
:: I have fixed this now on ]. - ] (]) 13:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

== Please comment on ] ==

The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 41288 --> ] (]) 04:25, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

== ] ==

Can it be verified that these picture is what it claims to be? It looks to me that few truck drivers are having lunch. The picture is used in the page with caption "Jats provide food to those stuck because of the blockades". https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Jat_reservation_3.jpg --] (]) 11:10, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
: I don't know. I have never worked with images. {{ping|RegentsPark}} can you give your opinion on this? Cheers, ] (]) 13:36, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
:: I'd say get rid of it. It may or may not be what it purports to be but we should always err on the side of caution when it comes to authenticity. If the picture was published in a reliable source, that would be a different matter. --] <small>(])</small> 14:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
:::{{ping|RegentsPark}} My edit in ] was reverted by a new user who is not the uploader. --] (]) 04:06, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
:::: Ok, the next step is to follow ]. Please open a talk page discussion, ping the other user, and ask him/her for the source of the picture. You can cite the Misplaced Pages sourcing policies ] etc. I have watch listed the page, and I can come in if needed. - ] (]) 10:36, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

== Left right ==

Kautilya, I'm surprised to see you trying to reframe the Indus Valley discussion in political terms, not something I expected and not something that is particularly productive. We're, most of us anyway, trying to be faithful to sources and to the weight that these sources give to different ideas. Reframing the debate as a political one sidetracks the issue, hardens opinions, and rarely results in a positive outcome. Something to think about? --] <small>(])</small> 14:56, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
: Ok, good point. I guess I still have some more "growing up" to do... - ] (]) 16:07, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
::Nah. We all get carried away at times. Fowler is exceptionally good at finding sources and is an excellent writer. Working with editors like Fowler (and Sitush) is one of the joys of being on Misplaced Pages and you'll figure that out soon enough. --] <small>(])</small> 17:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
:::"Hind-Sind divide"(as historians call it) over IVC started in 1940s, before partition. It's nothing new.(Hind=India, Sind=Pakistan). The civilization never exclusively belonged to one country alone. It's not a left-right ideological divide, but rather political one which has its root in an artificial attempt by the founding fathers of Pakistan to give Pakistan a separate identity independent of India/Indian history. The bluff was exposed in '60 & '70. It's a settled debate now that there were also urban settlements beyond Punjab and R'stan in the east upto UP. ] (]) 17:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
:::: Nice. The Pakistanis claim the Sanskrit name, and the Indians the Persian name of the same river, precisely to deny the exact same heritages! The irony! My alter-ego is called {{U|SindHind}} by the way. - ] (]) 18:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Secularism in India is exact opposite of secularism in America. For example, secularism in America is ], with same civil code for Christians, Jews, Hindus etc. Secularism in India is state control of religious institutions and different civil codes for different religions, including Sharia law. Free speech in India means that universities and employers cannot expel people even if they fly flag of ISIS. Free speech in America does not supersede codes of conduct of universities and employers. I can go on and on.<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 19:18, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

== Uncited content. ==

I was not sure whether to bring this up on my talk page or yours, so I brought it up on both pages. My apologies for violating any protocols. I am new here.

I was reading some wikipedia guidelines and they seem to suggest that the burden of proof lies on the person wishing to add or restore content. In most cases, content that is uncited is also unverifiable. A lot of it is potentially contentious. Is it not better to err on the side of caution? I, for one, would rather have articles that are less detailed but reliable than detailed articles that are potentially full of lies. ] (]) 14:31, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
: Hi, I have responded on your own talk page so that it is all in one place. Cheers, ] (]) 15:40, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

== Food for thought for Hindu Nationalists ==

I found this comics about Thor fighting with Hindu Gods in 1980 comics. If , then they will protest for few days. --] (]) 02:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

== Please comment on ] ==

The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 41477 --> ] (]) 04:25, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:44, 24 December 2024

This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: He should not be given alerts for those areas.

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20


Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of political parties in the United States on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

On Sanskrit inscriptions in a mosque

You might like this. Upd Edit (talk) 16:36, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Kautilya

I ginally understand, I think, why you use the name "Kautilya." I always wondered why you would use a reference to a 'prime minister' of Chandragupta, but it's a reference to encyclopedic collecting and compiling information. Regards, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 16:39, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
When you see an unnecessary block, you defend the affected user. When you see a need for help, you provide advice. You discuss edits with newer editors, explain possible issues with them and implement changes after highly constructive discussion. You do these things in your free time for other volunteers and the encyclopedia. I'm not sure if "random" is the right term, but these are acts of kindness you deserve a barnstar for. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:25, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Wow! Thank you ToBeFree. I am blushing... :-) -- Kautilya3 (talk) 19:32, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Infobox US political party on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

.

Hello, Kautilya3. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Ophiophagus hannah Cobra (talk) 16:13, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Edit Request for Audrey truschke

Hi! I am proposing a new edit request for Audrey truschke. This edit will include an author named girish shahane who issued a critique of her work on aurangzeb. This seems like a legitimate edit since the review was published in a reputable indian news outlet called scroll in.

https://scroll.in/article/856178/aurangzeb-was-a-bigot-not-just-by-our-standards-but-by-those-of-his-predecessors-and-peers

I really don't see why this can't be used as a valid critique even if the critique isn't is a historian. I'm just wondering why criticism has to come from only a historian for it to be valid. Can it not come from a reputable news outlet? Hope to hear from you thanks............... Ker3243 (talk) 00:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Academic works get academic reviews, published in journals. They get a lot higher weightage than those published in news outlets. History is a very ancient subject dating back to Herodotus and Aristotle. There is a long tradition of how to assess historical data, which scholarly historians follow. Popular historians know nothing about it. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:37, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

Season's Greetings

When he took up his hat to go, he gave one long look round the library. Then he turned ... (and Saxon took advantage of this to wag his way in and join the party), and said, "It's a rare privilege, the free entry of a book chamber like this. I'm hoping ... that you are not insensible of it."

(Text on page 17 illustrated in the frontispiece in Juliana Horatia Ewing's Mary's Meadow and Other Tales of Fields and Flowers, illustrated by Mary Wheelhouse, London: G. Bell and Sons, 1915.)

Fowler&fowler«Talk» 04:50, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you Fowler&fowler. What a lovely greeting! Happy holidays for you too! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

Happy holidays!
Wishing you a Merry Christmas filled with love and joy, a Happy Holiday season surrounded by warmth and laughter, and a New Year brimming with hope, happiness, and success! 🎄🎉✨ Baqi:) (talk) 10:56, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Thank you Jannatulbaqi. Happy holidays to you too! Let us hope that 2025 will be better than this year has been! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC)