Misplaced Pages

October surprise: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:28, 4 November 2004 view sourceRoozbeh (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,350 edits 2004 Bush vs. Kerry← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:46, 21 December 2024 view source Citation bot (talk | contribs)Bots5,420,687 edits Altered template type. Add: magazine, date. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Articles with unsourced statements from March 2008 | #UCB_Category 765/859 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Event that may influence US election}}{{pp-extended|small=yes}}
An '''October surprise''' is a stunning news event calculated to influence the outcome of a US election, particularly one for the presidency. "Historically, news outlets avoid investigative pieces critical of candidates within days of an election to avoid appearing partisan."
{{Use mdy dates|date=October 2016}}
{{Use American English|date=September 2023}}
{{About|the term in U.S. politics|the storm in Buffalo, New York|Lake Storm Aphid}}
In the ], an '''October surprise''' is a news event that may influence the outcome of an upcoming November election (particularly one for the ]), whether deliberately planned or spontaneously occurring. Because ] (as well as many state and local elections) is in early November, events that take place in October have greater potential to influence the decisions of prospective voters and allow less time to take remedial action; thus, relatively last-minute news stories could either change the course of an election or reinforce the inevitable.<ref name="Politico">{{cite news|url=https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/10/october-surprises-214320|title=15 October Surprises That Wreaked Havoc on Politics|first=Taylor|last=Gee|work=]|date=October 4, 2016|access-date=July 16, 2020|archive-date=November 26, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201126220216/https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/10/october-surprises-214320|url-status=live}}</ref>


The term "October surprise" was coined by ] when he served as ] of ];<ref name="Smithsonian">{{cite web|url=https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/strange-history-october-surprise-180960741/|title=The Strange History of the October Surprise|first=Jared|last=Keller|work=]|date=October 11, 2016|access-date=July 16, 2020|archive-date=September 7, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200907205233/https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/strange-history-october-surprise-180960741/|url-status=live}}</ref> however, there were October election-upending events that predated the coining of the term.<ref name="Politico" /><ref name="Smithsonian" />
==1980 Carter vs. Reagan==


{{Wiktionary|October surprise}}
]'s book '']'' made the phrase ''October surprise'' a permanent part of the political vocabulary, when he wrote about the ] ], when Democrat ] was up for re-election. After a military operation to rescue the hostages failed, rumors surfaced that Republican challenger ] was working on a "secret hostage deal the Iranian government".


==1992 Bush vs. Clinton== ==Prior to 1980==
===19th century===
In mid-October 1840, shortly before the ], federal prosecutors announced plans to charge top ] officials with "most stupendous and atrocious fraud" for paying Pennsylvanians to cross state lines and vote for Whig candidates in New York during the ].<ref name="gee">{{cite news |last1=Gee |first1=Taylor |title=15 October Surprises That Wreaked Havoc on Politics |url=https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/10/october-surprises-214320 |work=Politico Magazine |date=October 4, 2016 |language=en |access-date=July 16, 2020 |archive-date=November 26, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201126220216/https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/10/october-surprises-214320 |url-status=live }}</ref>


In 1844, an ] newspaper published an article, purportedly based on a book titled ''Roorback's Tour Through the Southern and Western States in the Year 1836'', implying that ] had his slaves ].<ref>Mark E. Byrnes, ''James K. Polk: A Biographical Companion'' (ABC-CLIO: New York, 2001), pp.182-3</ref> For some decades afterward, a practice similar to the modern "October surprise", in which the occurrence turned out to be untrue, was called "roorbacking" or "roorbaching".<ref name="Crothers">{{Cite web |date=September 9, 1857 |title=The Atlantic |url=http://archive.org/details/atlantic106bostuoft |publisher=Boston |page=181 |via=Internet Archive |quote=An illustration of the change that has taken place within a very few years may be seen in the history of the campaign lie, known in American politics as the ' roorbach.' The name first became current in 1844, when a mendacious statement, purporting to lie taken from Roorbach's Tour through the Western and Southern States was published wild the intent to destroy Mr. Polk's chances for the presidency. Under conditions then existing, it was thought safe to launch this falsehood two months before the election. By 1880, when the Morey letter was sprung upon Garfield, the expectancy of life for the roorbach had been reduced to two weeks.}}</ref>
:"Just four days before the vote that year, Reagan defense secretary Caspar Weinberger was indicted on Iran-Contra conspiracy charges (later overturned). It stopped a late Bush surge in the polls and Republicans howled at the timing."


On October 20, 1880, shortly before the ], a ] was published purportedly written by ] voicing support for ]. At the time, most white Americans opposed Chinese immigration and both presidential candidates were in favor of immigration restrictions.<ref name="gee"/>
==2000 Gore vs. Bush==


In the week leading up to the ], Republican nominee ] attended a meeting in which Presbyterian preacher ] claimed that the Democrats were the party of "]". Blaine's failure to object to Burchard's message cost him support from anti-prohibitionists, Roman Catholic immigrants, and southerners, playing a role in his narrow loss to Democratic candidate ].<ref name="gee"/>
A couple of days before the election, media unearthed an old report that ] had been arrested for drunken driving. Many pundits asserted that the story was responsible for putting a major dent in Bush's lead in the polls.


Two weeks before the ], the Republicans published a ] by ], the ]. In the letter, Sackville-West suggested that Democratic presidential candidate Grover Cleveland was preferred as president from the British point of view.<ref>{{cite news |title=That 'Murchison' Letter. The Alleged Correspondent Of Lord Sackville. A California Man Says He Entrapped The British Minister And Wants Harrison To Know It |url=https://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9906E7DE163AE532A2575AC0A9679C94689FD7CF |quote=George Osgoodby, author of the famous 'Murchison' letter, has lived at Pomona 15 years. He came to California from New-York when a boy, and has worked on farms during the greater part of his residence in California. |work=] |date=January 9, 1889 |access-date=2010-07-19}}</ref> The letter had a galvanizing effect on ] voters exactly comparable to the "Rum, Romanism, and Rebellion" blunder of the previous presidential election<ref>], ''Minority Victory: Gilded Age Politics and the Front Porch Campaign of 1888'' (2008).</ref> by trumpeting Great Britain's support for the Democrats. That drove Irish-American voters into the Republican fold, and Cleveland lost the presidency to Republican candidate ].
(See ]).


===20th century===
==2003 California re-call election==
In the weeks leading up to the ], rumors circulated that ] was of African-American descent. Harding's campaign feared that the rumor would affect his popularity amongst white southerners and so his campaign made it a point to prove Harding's whiteness.<ref>{{cite news|first=Beverly|last=Gage|title=Our First Black President?|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/06/magazine/06wwln-essay-t.html|newspaper=]|date=April 6, 2008|access-date=October 16, 2020|archive-date=December 10, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081210223839/http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/06/magazine/06wwln-essay-t.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="gee"/>


Less than a month before the ], President Roosevelt's press secretary ] kneed a black police officer in the groin outside ]. Roosevelt had already been facing skepticism from black voters because of his failure to desegregate the military. Roosevelt responded days before the election by appointing the nation's first black general, ], and announcing the creation of the ].<ref name="gee"/>
The Los Angeles Times released a story about ] a couple of days before the ], prompting many pundits to charge that the timing of the story was aimed specifically at derailing the recall campaign.


The ] and ] have both been described as October surprises during the ].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Cronkite |first1=Walter |title=A Huge 'October Surprise', 50 Years Later |url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6369922 |work=All Things Considered |publisher=NPR |date=October 23, 2006 |language=en |access-date=October 15, 2020 |archive-date=October 15, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211015073004/https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6369922 |url-status=live }}</ref>
==2004 Bush vs. Kerry==


On October 7, 1964, just under a month before the ], one of President Johnson's top aides, ], was arrested for ] at the Washington D.C. ], a place described by the ''Toledo Blade'' as "so notorious a gathering place of homosexuals that the District police had long since staked it out with peepholes for surveillance". A week later, ] was ousted from power by hardliners in the ], the ] won the ], and ] ].<ref name="gee"/>
The Kerry campaign blamed the Bush administration for the disappearance of huge cache of explosives from a warehouse in ] (see ]). The Pentagon retorted that US troops had never seen the munitions, which had last been seen by UN inspectors 3 months before the US-led invasion. (Timeline: )


During the ], ]—who was rising sharply in the polls due to the collapse of the ] vote—began to distance himself publicly from the ] on the ], calling for a bombing halt. The key turning point for Humphrey's campaign came when President Johnson officially announced a bombing halt, and even a possible peace deal, the weekend before the election. The "Halloween Peace" gave Humphrey's campaign a badly needed boost. In addition, Senator ] finally endorsed Humphrey in late October after previously refusing to do so, and by election day the polls were reporting a dead heat.<ref>Theodore H. White, ''The Making of the President, 1968'' (1970)</ref> However, Nixon won the election in a close race.
The Arabic news agency ] airs a video of ] just days before the November 2nd election (see ]). In a speech that justifies and takes responsibility for the actions of ], bin Laden calls out the Bush administration and the American position in the ]. "Your security does not lie in the hands of Kerry, Bush, or al-Qaeda," Osama claims. "Your security is in your own hands." (Speech Excerpt: ) The is believed to actually have helped Bush's position.


During the ] between the Republican incumbent ] and the Democratic nominee ], the United States was in the fourth year of negotiations to end the lengthy and domestically divisive ]. On October 26, 1972, twelve days before the election on November 7, the United States' chief negotiator and presidential National Security Advisor ] appeared at a press conference held at the ] and announced "We believe that peace is at hand."<ref>Kissinger 2003:591</ref> Nixon, despite having vowed to end the war during his presidential election campaign four years earlier, had failed to cease hostilities but had withdrawn all American ground combat units and most other American military personnel. While Nixon was nevertheless already widely considered to be assured of re-election, Kissinger's "peace is at hand" declaration increased Nixon's already high standing with the electorate: in the event, Nixon defeated McGovern in every state except Massachusetts and won by 23.2 points in the nationwide popular vote, which was the largest margin since 1936. Remaining U.S. military personnel were withdrawn in 1973, but U.S. involvement in Vietnam continued until 1975.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1454&dat=19950712&id=fU5OAAAAIBAJ&pg=1964,4863724&hl=en |first=Ed |last=Timms |title=Unresolved issues make decision hard |newspaper=Morning Star |location=Wilmington, North Carolina |page=1 |via=Google News Archive |access-date=February 4, 2019 |archive-date=October 9, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211009105731/https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1454&dat=19950712&id=fU5OAAAAIBAJ&pg=1964,4863724&hl=en |url-status=live }}</ref>
(See ].)


==1980: Carter vs. Reagan==
==External links==
{{Main|1980 United States presidential election|1980 October Surprise theory}}


=== Origin of term ===
* - Consortium News - May 15, 1999
In the ], Republican challenger ] feared that a last-minute deal to release ] might earn incumbent ] enough votes to win re-election.<ref name="observer">{{Cite news |title=John McCain and the October Surprise |url=http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/john-mccain-and-october-surprise |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081012105056/http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/john-mccain-and-october-surprise |archive-date=October 12, 2008 |access-date=January 27, 2009 |work=] |quote=The term "October surprise" is most famously associated with the 1980 campaign, when Republicans spent the fall worrying that Jimmy Carter would engineer a last-minute deal to free the American hostages who had been held in Iran since the previous year. Carter and Ronald Reagan were locked in a close race, but an awful economy and flagging national confidence made the president supremely vulnerable.}}</ref><ref name="NYT_1993-01-13">{{Cite news |last=Lewis |first=Neil A. |date=January 13, 1993 |title=House Inquiry Finds No Evidence of Deal On Hostages in 1980 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1993/01/13/us/house-inquiry-finds-no-evidence-of-deal-on-hostages-in-1980.html |access-date=September 21, 2014 |work=The New York Times |quote=A bipartisan House panel has concluded that there is no merit to the persistent accusations that people associated with the 1980 Presidential campaign of Ronald Reagan struck a secret deal with Iran to delay the release of American hostages until after the election. |archive-date=November 1, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191101224055/https://www.nytimes.com/1993/01/13/us/house-inquiry-finds-no-evidence-of-deal-on-hostages-in-1980.html |url-status=live }}</ref> As it happened, in the days prior to the election, press coverage was consumed with the Iranian government's decision—and Carter's simultaneous announcement—that the hostages would not be released until after the election.<ref name="NYT_1993-01-13" />
* - Associated Press

], the manager of the Reagan campaign, was the first person to mention the idea of an "October surprise" to the press.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book |last1=Germond |first1=Jack |url=https://archive.org/details/bluesmokemirrors00germ |title=Blue smoke and mirrors : how Reagan won and why Carter lost the election of 1980 |last2=Witcover |first2=Jules |date=1981 |publisher=Viking |isbn=978-0-670-51383-3 |location=New York}}</ref>{{Rp|10}} On the morning of July 17, he told the press at the ] that he was concerned that Carter would use the advantage of incumbency to spring an event that would benefit him politically.<ref name=":1">{{Cite news |last=Campell |first=Don |date=17 July 1980 |title=GOP's 'incumbency watch' to eye Carter campaign |url=https://cdnc.ucr.edu/cgi-bin/cdnc?a=d&d=SBS19800716.1.4&e=-------en--20--1--txt-txIN-%252522october+surprise%252522-------1 |work=San Bernardino Sun |agency=Gannett News Service |access-date=January 11, 2021 |archive-date=January 13, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210113023951/https://cdnc.ucr.edu/cgi-bin/cdnc?a=d&d=SBS19800716.1.4&e=-------en--20--1--txt-txIN-%2522october%20surprise%2522-------1 |url-status=live }}</ref> Casey mentioned that Carter had done this during the Wisconsin primary—in reference to Carter's announcement on election morning that he had "good news" concerning the hostages.<ref name=":1" /> Casey mentioned to the press that he was setting up an "intelligence operation" to monitor Carter's political activities to keep abreast of such a possibility.<ref name=":0" />{{Rp|10}}

The intelligence operation the Reagan campaign set up was extensive.<ref>{{Cite report |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cEESl2W9cGoC |title=Unauthorized Transfers of Nonpublic Information During the 1980 Presidential Election: Report |last=United States Congress House Committee on Post Office and Civil Service Subcommittee on Human Services |date=1984 |publisher=U.S. Government Printing Office |language=en |chapter=Chapter 3 Section III: The October Surprise |access-date=January 11, 2021 |archive-date=August 25, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240825055954/https://books.google.com/books?id=cEESl2W9cGoC |url-status=live }}</ref> It used military contacts at key air force bases to keep track of military flight movement which could be used to gauge government action concerning the hostages.<ref name=":0" />{{Rp|10}} The operation had also compiled a list of the embargoed military equipment that the U.S. government had of the Iranians that Carter could use to barter in exchange for the release of the hostages.<ref name=":0" />{{Rp|11}} To keep abreast of international information concerning the hostages, the Reagan campaign tapped former Secretary of State ] and his extensive network of international contacts.<ref name=":0" />{{Rp|9}}

The Reagan campaign's ominous warnings of a possible October surprise to the press was done for strategic reasons. It was intended to prepare the voters, so that if some good October news happened, the voters would look at the event as a political ploy by the Carter campaign to win the election.<ref name=":0" />{{Rp|8}} Personal papers left by ] indicate that the "team" around ], the chairman of ], "collaborated closely with the Reagan campaign in its efforts to pre-empt and discourage what it derisively labeled an 'October surprise'—a pre-election release of the American hostages, the papers show. The Chase team helped the Reagan campaign gather and spread rumors about possible payoffs to win the release, a propaganda effort that Carter administration officials have said impeded talks to free the captives." Rockefeller, a lifelong ], assisted the Reagan campaign because he had a negative view on Carter's dovish foreign policy, and also because Chase Bank's balance sheet held $360 million (equivalent to ${{formatprice|{{inflation|US-GDP|360,000,000|1980}}}} in {{inflation/year|US-GDP}}){{inflation/fn|US-GDP}} in loans to Iran and more than $500 million (equivalent to ${{formatprice|{{inflation|US-GDP|500,000,000|1980}}}} in {{inflation/year|US-GDP}}){{inflation/fn|US-GDP}} in frozen Iranian deposits.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Kirkpatrick |first=David D. |date=2019-12-29 |title=How a Chase Bank Chairman Helped the Deposed Shah of Iran Enter the U.S. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/29/world/middleeast/shah-iran-chase-papers.html |access-date=2020-01-19 |work=The New York Times |language=en-US |issn=0362-4331 |archive-date=December 29, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191229165639/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/29/world/middleeast/shah-iran-chase-papers.html |url-status=live }}</ref>

] wrote an article in '']'' in the fall of 1980 about a possible October surprise, in which he alleged that the Carter administration was preparing a major military operation in ] for rescuing U.S. hostages in order to help him get re-elected. Subsequent allegations surfaced against Reagan alleging that his team had actively impeded the hostage release.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Lenahan |first=Rod |title=Crippled Eagle: A Historical Perspective Of U.S. Special Operations 1976–1996 |publisher=Narwhal Press |year=1998 |isbn=1-886391-23-8 |page=178}}</ref>

=== Secret deal accusation ===
After the release of the hostages on January 20, 1981, minutes after Reagan's inauguration, some charged that the Reagan campaign had made a secret deal with the Iranian government whereby the Iranians would hold the hostages until after Reagan was elected and inaugurated.<ref name="NYT_1993-01-13" /> ], member of the ] under Presidents Ford and Carter (before being relieved of his duties weeks into Reagan's term),<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.sipa.columbia.edu/academics/directory/ggs2-fac.html |title=SIPA: Faculty Gary Sick |website=Sipa.columbia.edu |access-date=November 18, 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100804001950/http://www.sipa.columbia.edu/academics/directory/ggs2-fac.html |archive-date=August 4, 2010 }}</ref> made the accusation in a '']'' editorial<ref name="NYT 1991-04-15">{{cite news |date=April 15, 1991 |title=The Election Story of the Decade |author=Gary Sick |newspaper=The New York Times}} reprinted in {{cite news |url=http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1992_cr/h920205-october-clips.htm |title=Creating a Task Force to Investigate Certain Allegations Concerning the Holding of Americans as Hostages by Iran in 1980 (House of Representatives - February 05, 1992) |publisher=Fas.org |access-date=November 18, 2010}}</ref> in the run-up to the 1992 election. The initial bipartisan response from Congress was skeptical: House Democrats refused to authorize an inquiry, and Senate Republicans denied a $600,000 appropriation for a probe. Eight former hostages also sent an open letter demanding an inquiry in 1991.<ref name="NYT 1991-04-15" /> In subsequent Congressional testimony, Sick said that the popular media had distorted and misrepresented the accusers, reducing them to "gross generalizations" and "generic conspiracy theorists". Sick penned a book on the subject and sold the film rights to it for a reported $300,000.<ref>{{cite magazine |last=Dreifus |first=Claudia |author-link=Claudia Dreifus |url=https://ew.com/article/1992/01/24/gary-sicks-conspiracy/ |title=Himself Surprised |magazine=Entertainment Weekly |date=January 24, 1992 |access-date=November 18, 2010 |archive-date=August 25, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240825055955/https://ew.com/article/1992/01/24/gary-sicks-conspiracy/ |url-status=live }}</ref> His sources and thesis were contested by a number of commentators on both sides of the aisle.<ref>{{cite news |author=Michael Ledeen |author-link=Michael Ledeen |url=http://www.commentarymagazine.com/viewarticle.cfm/october-surprise--by-gary-sick-7983 |title=October Surprise, by Gary Sick |work=Commentary |date=June 1, 1992 |access-date=November 18, 2010 |archive-date=August 18, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100818081033/http://www.commentarymagazine.com/viewarticle.cfm/october-surprise--by-gary-sick-7983 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |author=Daniel Pipes |url=http://www.danielpipes.org/1654/the-october-surprise-theory |title=The 'October Surprise' Theory |publisher=Daniel Pipes |date=January 1, 2003 |access-date=November 18, 2010 |archive-date=July 1, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090701050931/http://www.danielpipes.org/1654/the-october-surprise-theory |url-status=live }}</ref>

], the former President of Iran, has also stated "that the Reagan campaign struck a deal with Tehran to delay the release of the hostages in 1980", asserting that "by the month before the American Presidential election in November 1980, many in Iran's ruling circles were openly discussing the fact that a deal had been made between the Reagan campaign team and some Iranian religious leaders in which the hostages' release would be delayed until after the election so as to prevent President Carter's re-election."<ref>{{cite news |first=Neil A. |last=Lewis |title=Bani-Sadr, in U.S., Renews Charges of 1980 Deal |newspaper=The New York Times |date=May 7, 1991 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1991/05/07/world/bani-sadr-in-us-renews-charges-of-1980-deal.html |access-date=November 18, 2010 |archive-date=April 23, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090423081211/http://www.nytimes.com/1991/05/07/world/bani-sadr-in-us-renews-charges-of-1980-deal.html |url-status=live }}</ref> He repeated the charge in ''My Turn to Speak: Iran, the Revolution & Secret Deals with the U.S.''<ref>Abolhassan Banisadr. '' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110614104926/http://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/2621268 |date=June 14, 2011 }}''. From a series of interviews with Jean-Charles Deniau. Foreword by L. Bruce Laingen. Washington, D.C.: Potomac Books, 1991. {{ISBN|0-08-040563-0}}. Translation of Abol Hassan Bani Sadr. {{lang|fr|Le complot des ayatollahs. Propos recueillis par Jean-Charles Deniau}}. Paris: La Découverte, 1989.</ref> Former ] ] asserts that during the 1980 election campaign, he accompanied Connally on a trip through several Middle Eastern capitals, during which Connally consistently conveyed to regional leaders that they should inform the Iranian government that Iran should wait to release ] until after the election.<ref name="Baker2023">{{cite news|title=A Four-Decade Secret: One Man's Story of Sabotaging Carter's Re-election|first=Peter|last=Baker|newspaper=The New York Times|date=March 18, 2023|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/18/us/politics/jimmy-carter-october-surprise-iran-hostages.html|access-date=June 11, 2023|archive-date=March 18, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230318200201/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/18/us/politics/jimmy-carter-october-surprise-iran-hostages.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Upon their return to the U.S., Barnes claims that Connally briefed Casey on their trip in an ].<ref name="Baker2023" />

Four people identified by Barnes confirmed to a reporter for '']'' that Barnes had conveyed these incidents to them in the years before Barnes went public with his story: ], former director of the ]; Tom Johnson, one of LBJ's aides; Larry Temple, one of Connally's and Johnson's aides; and ], an historian at the ].<ref name="Baker2023" /> Moreover, Brands wrote about Barnes's story in his 2015 biography of Reagan, although the account went largely unnoticed at the time; however, ''The New York Times'' also observed that "Confirming Mr. Barnes's account is problematic" and the fact that John Connally III said he was with his father when he briefed Reagan about the trip, and nothing on this subject was discussed.<ref name="Baker2023" />

Barbara Honegger, a 1980 Reagan–Bush campaign staffer and later a Reagan White House policy analyst, claims to have discovered information that made her believe that ] and ] had conspired to assure that Iran would not free the U.S. hostages until Jimmy Carter had been defeated in the 1980 presidential election, and she alleges that arms sales to Iran were a part of that bargain.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Honegger|first=Barbara|url=http://archive.org/details/octobersurprise00hone|title=October surprise|date=1989|location=New York |publisher=Tudor |via=Internet Archive|isbn=978-0-944276-46-4}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=Troy|first=Gil|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VTkDAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA281|title=Morning in America: How Ronald Reagan Invented the 1980s|date=2013-10-24|publisher=Princeton University Press|isbn=978-1-4008-4930-7|language=en}}</ref> Two separate congressional investigations looked into the charges, both concluding that there was no plan to seek to delay the hostages' release.<ref name="NYT_1993-01-13" />

==1992: Bush vs. Clinton ==
{{Main|1992 United States presidential election}}

In June 1992, Ronald Reagan's Secretary of Defense ] was indicted in the ].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1992/06/17/us/weinberger-faces-5-counts-in-iran-contra-indictment.html|title=Weinberger Faces 5 Counts In Iran-Contra Indictment|first=David|last=Johnston|date=June 17, 1992|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=February 4, 2019|archive-date=March 9, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210309180241/https://www.nytimes.com/1992/06/17/us/weinberger-faces-5-counts-in-iran-contra-indictment.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://fas.org/irp/offdocs/walsh/|title=Walsh Iran / Contra Report|website=fas.org|access-date=October 16, 2020|archive-date=April 17, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090417230304/http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/walsh/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=":3">{{Cite news |last=Greenfield |first=Jeff |date=October 15, 2024 |title=The October Surprise May Be Arriving Shortly |url=https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/10/15/october-suprise-elections-00183505 |work=Politico}}</ref> Although he claims to have been opposed to the sale on principle, Weinberger participated in the transfer of United States ] missiles to ] that were used to stop Saddam Hussein's massive tank army, and was later indicted on several ] charges of lying to the Iran-Contra independent counsel during its investigation. Republicans angrily accused ] ] of timing Weinberger's indictment to hurt ]'s re-election chances. Throughout the campaign as Weinberger's trial approached, more concrete information on Bush's direct role emerged, including statements by Reagan Middle East specialist Howard Teicher that Bush knew of the arms deal in spring 1986 and an Israeli memo that made it clear that Bush was well versed in the deal by July 1986.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1992/10/04/us/years-later-questions-remain-about-bush-s-role-in-the-iran-contra-affair.html|title=Years Later, Questions Remain About Bush's Role in the Iran-Contra Affair|first=David|last=Johnston|date=October 4, 1992|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=February 4, 2019|archive-date=February 4, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190204122600/https://www.nytimes.com/1992/10/04/us/years-later-questions-remain-about-bush-s-role-in-the-iran-contra-affair.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1992/10/05/opinion/mr-bush-had-to-know.html|title=Mr. Bush Had to Know|date=October 5, 1992|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=February 4, 2019|archive-date=February 4, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190204122536/https://www.nytimes.com/1992/10/05/opinion/mr-bush-had-to-know.html|url-status=live}}</ref>

==2000: Gore vs. Bush==
{{Main|2000 United States presidential election}}

Days before the November 7 election, ] of ], a prominent defense attorney and 1998 Democratic candidate for governor, confirmed to a reporter that ] presidential candidate ] had been arrested for drunk driving in that state in 1976. Bush confirmed the report in a press conference moments after it was revealed.<ref>{{cite magazine |author=Adam Cohen |url=http://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,59739,00.html |title=Fallout From A Midnight Ride |date=November 13, 2000 |magazine=] |access-date=March 6, 2020 }}</ref><ref name=":3" />

==2003: California governor recall election==
{{Main|2003 California gubernatorial recall election}}
On October 2, 2003, the '']'' released a story about ] and subsequent allegations that he was a womanizer guilty of multiple acts of sexual misconduct in past decades. The story was released just before the 2003 California recall (which was scheduled for October 7), prompting many pundits to charge that the timing of the story was aimed specifically at derailing the recall campaign.<ref>{{cite news |date=October 27, 2004 |url=http://www.washtimes.com/national/20041027-123351-4664r.htm |title=CBS eyed '60 Minutes' Bush bombshell |newspaper=] |access-date=November 18, 2010}}</ref> It was not the only embarrassing story about Schwarzenegger to surface just days before the campaign: the next day, ] and ''The New York Times'' reported that in 1975 Schwarzenegger had praised ] during interviews for the film '']'', which was responsible for the bodybuilder-turned-actor's fame.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.foxnews.com/story/arnold-allegedly-praised-hitler-in-1975-interview |work=Fox News |title=Arnold Allegedly Praised Hitler in 1975 Interview |date=October 3, 2003 |access-date=August 22, 2008 |archive-date=July 26, 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080726061423/http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,98982,00.html |url-status=live }}</ref> The twin controversies later led ''Los Angeles Times'' columnist Steve Lopez to coin the term "gropenfuhrer" to describe California's governor-elect (a compounded pun on the Nazi paramilitary rank ] and the words ] and ]);<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2003-oct-08-me-lopez8-story.html |author=Steve Lopez |title=Der Gropenfuhrer Muscles His Way Into Office – So What Now? |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |date=October 8, 2003 |access-date=November 18, 2010 |archive-date=July 8, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200708163750/https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2003-oct-08-me-lopez8-story.html |url-status=live }}</ref> a series of '']'' strips made the term famous.

==2004: Bush vs. Kerry ==
{{Main|2004 United States presidential election}}
On October 27, ''The New York Times'' reported the disappearance of a huge cache of explosives from a warehouse in ] (the ]). The ] campaign blamed the Bush administration for this supposed mismanagement; administration officials charged that the ''Times'' had gotten the story wrong, and that the explosives had been cleared from the storage facility before the looting was supposed to have taken place.

On October 29, the Arabic news agency ] aired ].<ref name="observer" /><ref name=":3" /> In a speech that justified and took responsibility for the actions of September 11, bin Laden called out the Bush administration and the American position in the ]. Bin Laden was quoted as saying: "Your security does not lie in the hands of Kerry, Bush, or al-Qaeda. Your security is in your own hands."<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3966817.stm |title=Excerpts: Bin Laden video |publisher=BBC News |date=October 29, 2004 |access-date=November 18, 2010 |archive-date=September 12, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170912162712/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3966817.stm |url-status=live }}</ref> This is believed to have helped President Bush's campaign as it thrust the ] back into the public eye. There is debate as to whether bin Laden was aware of the effect the video would have on the elections; the "Bush bounce" from the video did not surprise most outside observers of the 2004 election. It has been claimed that Saudi Prince ] cut the price of oil (thus reducing gas prices) to help ensure a Bush victory.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://money.cnn.com/2004/04/19/news/international/election_saudi/ |title=Saudis said to boost oil output |website=Money.cnn.com |date=April 19, 2004 |access-date=November 18, 2010 |archive-date=September 26, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110926060906/http://money.cnn.com/2004/04/19/news/international/election_saudi/ |url-status=live }}</ref> According to a '']'' broadcast, "Prince Bandar enjoys easy access to the Oval Office. His family and the Bush family are close. And ] told us that Bandar has promised the president that Saudi Arabia will lower oil prices in the months before the election to ensure the U.S. economy is strong on Election Day."<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.democracynow.org/2004/4/20/did_bush_cut_secret_oil_deal |title=Did Bush Cut Secret Oil Deal With Saudis Ahead of 2004 Election? |website=Democracy Now |date=April 20, 2004 |access-date=November 18, 2010 |archive-date=November 17, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101117075445/http://www.democracynow.org/2004/4/20/did_bush_cut_secret_oil_deal |url-status=live }}</ref>

==2006 midterm elections==
{{Main|2006 United States elections}}
Two studies by '']'' on ] before and after the ] have been described as October surprises for the 2004 and 2006 elections.<ref name="WaPoBoo">{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/20/AR2006102001743.html |title=Boo!? An Inevitable October Surprise |author=Linton Weeks |newspaper=] |date=October 21, 2006 |access-date=September 21, 2014}}</ref> ] acknowledged that the 2004 study was timed to appear just before the presidential election,<ref name="NatJ">National Journal, {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080324012541/http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/databomb/index.htm |date=March 24, 2008 }}</ref> though he denied that it was meant to favor one candidate over another.{{Citation needed|date=March 2008}} Although the studies used standard epidemiological methods, was peer-reviewed and supported by a majority of statisticians and epidemiologists, political critics have dismissed the studies based on a variety of alleged shortcomings.<ref name="NatJ"/>

The ], in which the congressman resigned over sexual computer messages that he exchanged with underage ], broke on September 28, 2006, and dominated the news in early October. ] wrote, "The October surprise came early this election year...."<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aUnUTu_ZrhDk |title=October Surprise in This Campaign Puts Republicans On the Spot |author=Catherine Dodge |author2=Jay Newton-Small |date=October 3, 2006 |publisher=Bloomberg |access-date=October 3, 2006 }}</ref> Allegations that both Republicans and Democrats had knowledge of Foley's actions months before the breaking of the story only fueled the speculation regarding the possibly politically motivated timing of the story's release.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.foxnews.com/story/is-foley-scandal-the-october-surprise |work=Fox News |title=Is Foley Scandal the 'October Surprise'? |date=October 6, 2006 |access-date=October 16, 2006 |archive-date=October 16, 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061016174542/http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,218144,00.html |url-status=live }}</ref>

News that the ] would be rendered on November 5, 2006, just two days ahead of the U.S. midterm elections, led ] of magazine '']'' to dub it, on October 17, the "November Surprise".<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thenation.com/blogs/notion?pid=130487 |title=November Surprise? |author=Tom Engelhardt |author-link=Tom Engelhardt |work=] |date=October 17, 2006
|access-date=October 18, 2006}}</ref> In a ] Press gaggle on November 4, 2006, a reporter suggested that the timing of the verdict might be an attempt to influence the outcome of the November election, to which White House Press Secretary ] replied "Are you smoking rope?" Snow later told CNN's '']'', "The idea is preposterous, that somehow we've been scheming and plotting with the Iraqis".<ref>{{cite news |author=Christine Hauser |date=November 5, 2006 |title=Praising Verdict, Bush Says U.S. Will Stand By Iraq |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/05/world/middleeast/05cnd-reaction.html |newspaper=The New York Times |access-date=September 21, 2014 |archive-date=January 14, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160114074910/http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/05/world/middleeast/05cnd-reaction.html |url-status=live }}</ref>

==2008: McCain vs. Obama ==
{{Main|2008 United States presidential election}}
On October 31, 2008, four days before the ], the ] reported that ], half-aunt of Democratic candidate ], was living as an illegal immigrant in ]. She had been denied asylum and ordered to leave the United States in 2004.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/01/AR2008110102187.html?hpid=topnews |newspaper=The Washington Post |first1=Spencer S. |last1=Hsu |first2=Judy |last2=Rakowsky |title=Disclosure About Obama's Aunt May Have Violated Privacy Policy |date=November 2, 2008 |access-date=October 31, 2017 |archive-date=November 16, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171116203311/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/01/AR2008110102187.html?hpid=topnews |url-status=live }}</ref>

Some have also described the stock market crash and October 2008 record rise in unemployment as an "October Surprise", although the downturn in the American and global stock markets started in September.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/08/business/economy/08econ.html?pagewanted=all |work=The New York Times |first=Peter S. |last=Goodman |title=Jobless Rate at 14-Year High After October Losses |date=November 8, 2008}}</ref><ref name=":3" />

==2012: Obama vs. Romney==
{{Main|2012 United States presidential election}}
] was labeled the October surprise by some in the media at the time,<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/aaa0910a-222c-11e2-9ffd-00144feabdc0.html |title=Frankenstorm generates 'October surprise' |author=Jurek Martin |newspaper=Financial Times |date=October 30, 2012 |access-date=September 21, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/aiko-stevenson/october-surprise-sandy_b_2042800.html |title=October Surprise Arrives With Less Than a Week to Go |author=Aiko Stevenson |work=] |date=October 30, 2012 |access-date=September 21, 2014 |archive-date=October 7, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141007191341/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/aiko-stevenson/october-surprise-sandy_b_2042800.html |url-status=live }}</ref> though there some researchers found no evidence that it impacted the outcome of the election after the fact.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Hart |first=Joshua |date=July 2014 |title=Did Hurricane Sandy influence the 2012 US presidential election? |url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24767585/ |journal=Social Science Research |volume=46 |pages=1–8 |doi=10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.02.005 |issn=1096-0317 |pmid=24767585}}</ref>

== 2014 midterm elections ==
{{Main|2014 United States elections}}
The ] was considered an October surprise by some media outlets.<ref name="vox" />

==2016: Clinton vs. Trump==
{{Main|2016 United States presidential election}}

=== Access Hollywood tape ===
On October 7, ] was released in which Republican Party nominee ], using explicit language in a conversation with '']'' anchor ] (nephew of Republican President ] and first cousin of Republican President ] and his brother, Republican former Florida governor and ] ]), stated "when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything... Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything." Several politicians from both major parties expressed their disapproval of these remarks. Trump, who had been accused of ] on several occasions before, later apologized for these remarks, saying they "don't reflect who I am".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.cnn.com/2016/10/07/politics/donald-trump-campaign-crisis/index.html|title=Can Donald Trump recover from this?|first=Stephen|last=Collinson|website=CNN|access-date=February 4, 2019|archive-date=February 4, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190204122332/https://www.cnn.com/2016/10/07/politics/donald-trump-campaign-crisis/index.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |author=Tom Liddy |title=Donald Trump's List of Excuses for Comments About Women |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trumps-list-excuses-comments-women/story?id=42658347 |publisher=] |date=October 7, 2016 |access-date=October 8, 2016 |archive-date=October 8, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161008074929/http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trumps-list-excuses-comments-women/story?id=42658347 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |author=Claire Cohen |title=Donald Trump sexism tracker: Every offensive comment in one place |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/politics/donald-trump-sexism-tracker-every-offensive-comment-in-one-place/ |newspaper=] |date=October 8, 2016 |access-date=October 8, 2016 |archive-date=June 22, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160622161328/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/politics/donald-trump-sexism-tracker-every-offensive-comment-in-one-place/ |url-status=live }}</ref>

The remarks led to ] from Trump including Arizona Senator ], New Hampshire Senator ], and ]. Many others who had not previously endorsed him asked him to step aside as the Republican nominee, including former Secretary of State ].{{Citation needed|date=October 2024}}

=== WikiLeaks ===
{{See also|Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections}}
Also on October 7, ] began a two-month campaign of releasing emails and excerpts from the account of ]. They would later become known as the ]. They shed a negative light on Democratic Party nominee ] and included recordings of excerpts of speeches given by Clinton to a variety of banks, a debate question being leaked to Clinton prior to the debate, a stance on trade-deals different from those purported by Clinton during her campaign, along with her belief that it is beneficial to hold both public and private beliefs.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Jamieson|first=Amber|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/31/donna-brazile-hillary-clinton-debate-question-podesta-emails-cnn|title=DNC head leaked debate question to Clinton, Podesta emails suggests|date=2016-10-31|work=The Guardian|access-date=2020-04-22|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077|archive-date=July 30, 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240730154157/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/31/donna-brazile-hillary-clinton-debate-question-podesta-emails-cnn|url-status=live}}</ref>

=== James Comey investigation ===
Three weeks later, on October 28, then-FBI Director ] announced in a letter to Congress that he would take "appropriate investigative steps" to review additional emails related to Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server. This was announced after newly discovered emails were found on a computer that was seized by the FBI during an investigation of former congressman ] who had been accused of sending explicit pictures to a minor. According to law enforcement officials, the emails were found on a computer used by both Weiner and his then-wife, top Clinton aide ]. Several hours later, Hillary Clinton responded to the decision of the Director by calling on the FBI to be fully transparent and to release "full and complete facts" on what the emails contained. On October 30, it was reported that 650,000 emails on Weiner's computer were to be investigated, potentially being relevant to this particular and other cases.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi-comey-donald-trump-anthony-weiner-huma-abedin-514918|title=The real reason the FBI is reviewing more of Hillary Clinton's Emails|date=October 28, 2016|newspaper=Newsweek|access-date=October 29, 2016|archive-date=October 29, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161029023803/http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi-comey-donald-trump-anthony-weiner-huma-abedin-514918|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="comey-reopen">{{cite news |url=http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/28/politics/fbi-reviewing-new-emails-in-clinton-probe-director-tells-senate-judiciary-committee/ |title=FBI reviewing new emails in Clinton classified information probe |last1=Schleifer |first1=Theodore |last2=Collinson |first2=Stephen |date=October 28, 2016 |publisher=] |access-date=October 28, 2016 |archive-date=October 28, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161028200818/http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/28/politics/fbi-reviewing-new-emails-in-clinton-probe-director-tells-senate-judiciary-committee/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/apps/g/page/politics/oct-28-fbi-letter-to-congressional-leaders-on-clinton-email-investigation/2113/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161029113848/https://www.washingtonpost.com/apps/g/page/politics/oct-28-fbi-letter-to-congressional-leaders-on-clinton-email-investigation/2113/|url-status=dead|archive-date=October 29, 2016|title=Oct. 28 FBI letter to congressional leaders on Clinton email investigation|newspaper=The Washington Post|access-date=October 29, 2016}}</ref> Almost all ended up being duplicates, and when Comey revealed that the investigation found nothing on November 6th, some Clinton aides later worried that it put the emails back in the news cycle two days before the election.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Murray |first=Mark |date=2017-08-23 |title=12 days that stunned a nation: How Hillary Clinton lost |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/12-days-stunned-nation-how-hillary-clinton-lost-n794131 |access-date=2024-10-04 |website=NBC News |language=en}}</ref> Comey also received criticism for only publicly disclosing the Clinton email investigations and keeping quiet about the investigations into Russian attempts to boost Donald Trump.<ref name=":2">{{Cite news |last=Graff |first=Garrett M. |date=2020-09-25 |title=Review {{!}} For Comey, time has not healed a major wound |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/for-comey-time-has-not-healed-a-major-wound/2020/09/25/2abf3ae2-f6a2-11ea-be57-d00bb9bc632d_story.html |access-date=2024-10-04 |newspaper=Washington Post |language=en-US |issn=0190-8286}}</ref> A 2018 ] report of the decision to reopen the investigation in October described it as "a serious error in judgment".<ref name=":2" /> Daniel Drezner argued it was the greatest October surprise of the modern presidency.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Drezner |first=Daniel W. |date=September 9, 2020 |title=Perspective: Will there be an 'October surprise' in foreign policy? |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/09/09/will-there-be-an-october-surprise-foreign-policy/ |newspaper=Washington Post |quote=In campaign parlance, the term 'October surprise' means a news story that breaks late in an election cycle that could tip the balance of the election. Hands down, James B. Comey’s 2016 reopening of the FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails is the greatest October surprise of the modern presidency.}}</ref><ref name=":3" />

== 2018 midterm elections ==
{{Main|2018 United States elections}}
A ] from Central America became the "October surprise" of 2018.<ref name="vox">{{cite news|url=https://www.vox.com/2018/11/5/18065004/strikethrough-every-election-crisis-caravan-midterm-trump|title=Why every election gets its own crisis|first=Carlos|last=Maza|date=November 5, 2018|website=Vox|access-date=February 4, 2019|archive-date=July 30, 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240730174816/https://www.vox.com/2018/11/5/18065004/strikethrough-every-election-crisis-caravan-midterm-trump|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-october-surprise-arrives-1540422382|title=Opinion - The October Surprise Arrives|first=Daniel|last=Henninger|date=October 24, 2018|newspaper=The Wall Street Journal |access-date=February 4, 2019}}</ref>{{Additional citations needed|date=October 2024}} President Trump ] information about the caravan,<ref name="trump tweeted"/> and later released a Republican television advertisement that many criticized as racist (], ], and ] removed the advertisement after they deemed it racist and ] refused to air it).<ref name="republican tv advert"/> The story dominated discussion on many news networks, with many pundits criticizing Trump. News host ] said on his Fox News show that the migrant caravan "hysteria" was actually intended to stoke fear before the midterm election and ridiculed Trump's claims.<ref>{{cite news |last=Shamsian |first=Jacob |date=October 29, 2018 |title='There is nothing at all to worry about': Fox News host Shep Smith says the migrant caravan hysteria is actually about the midterm election |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/shep-smith-fox-news-caravan-midterm-election-2018-10 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190201012317/https://www.businessinsider.com/shep-smith-fox-news-caravan-midterm-election-2018-10 |archive-date=February 1, 2019 |access-date=February 4, 2019 |website=Business Insider}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/shepard-smith-caravan-invasion-election-fearmongering_us_5bd77fc5e4b017e5bfd4de14|title=Fox News' Shep Smith Ridicules Trump's Migrant Caravan 'Invasion' Claim|first=Mary|last=Papenfuss|date=October 30, 2018|website=HuffPost|access-date=February 4, 2019|archive-date=February 3, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190203191403/https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/shepard-smith-caravan-invasion-election-fearmongering_us_5bd77fc5e4b017e5bfd4de14|url-status=live}}</ref>

== 2020: Trump vs. Biden ==
{{Main|2020 United States presidential election||Tax returns of Donald Trump#2020 New York Times reporting||White House COVID-19 outbreak|Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory||Unmasking by U.S. intelligence agencies#Unmasking aides to Donald Trump}}{{Recentism section|section|reason=the sources cited are from the day or two after the event. There should be analysis from after the election to confirm whether or not it was an October surprise|date=October 2024}}
On October 2, Trump announced that he and ] had tested positive for ].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Baker |first1=Peter |title=Trump Tests Positive for the Coronavirus |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/02/us/politics/trump-covid.html |website=] |date=October 2, 2020 |access-date=2 October 2020 |archive-date=February 16, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210216232704/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/02/us/politics/trump-covid.html |url-status=live }}</ref> This was considered by some the day after the event to be an October surprise,<ref>{{cite news |last=Gawthorpe |first=Andrew |title=Donald Trump's coronavirus infection is the ultimate 'October surprise' |url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/oct/02/donald-trump-coronavirus-infection-october-surprise |date=October 3, 2020 |website=] |access-date=October 18, 2020 |archive-date=July 30, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240730154200/https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/oct/02/donald-trump-coronavirus-infection-october-surprise |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Luce |first=Edward |title=Trump's coronavirus October surprise |url=https://www.ft.com/content/d65c19f4-49f6-410c-9e79-9edcb77308d9 |date=October 2, 2020 |website=] |access-date=October 18, 2020 |archive-date=October 21, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201021190140/https://www.ft.com/content/d65c19f4-49f6-410c-9e79-9edcb77308d9 |url-status=live }}</ref>{{Disputed inline|date=October 2024}} and this positive diagnosis was a part of a larger outbreak that occurred in the White House in October 2020, and had been traced back to the fast-tracked ceremony to announce ] as the successor to ]'s Supreme Court seat. The event has been described by infectious disease expert ] as a "super spreader" event which reportedly infected over 30 people, including senior White House officials.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Annett |first1=Timothy |title=Fauci Calls White House Ceremony a 'Super-Spreader Event' |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-09/fauci-calls-white-house-ceremony-a-super-spreader-event |website=] |date=October 9, 2020 |access-date=October 18, 2020 |archive-date=August 25, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240825060630/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-09/fauci-calls-white-house-ceremony-a-super-spreader-event |url-status=live }}</ref> ''The Economist'' argued that the polling shift from the COVID case erased before election day, arguing it was likely not an October surprise.<ref>{{Cite news |date=October 8, 2024 |title=Could an "October surprise" upset America's election? |url=https://www.economist.com/united-states/2024/10/08/could-an-october-surprise-upset-americas-election |access-date=2024-10-14 |newspaper=The Economist |issn=0013-0613}}</ref>

An October 14 article by the '']'' related to emails found on an external hard drive of a ] was considered to be an October surprise, however ] described it as a "failed one".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/how-fake-persona-laid-groundwork-hunter-biden-conspiracy-deluge-n1245387|title=How a fake persona laid the groundwork for a Hunter Biden conspiracy deluge|date=October 30, 2020|website=NBC News|access-date=September 9, 2023|archive-date=May 13, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210513082330/https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/how-fake-persona-laid-groundwork-hunter-biden-conspiracy-deluge-n1245387|url-status=live}}</ref>{{Relevance inline|date=October 2024}}

== 2022 midterm elections ==
{{Main|2022 United States elections}}On October 3, 2022, '']'' reported that former football player ], the Republican nominee in the ], paid for his wife's 2009 abortion despite claiming to be "100% ]". Walker's son Christian, who has a large following as a right-wing social media influencer, additionally stated that the woman whose abortion Walker paid for was Christian's mother. Christian Walker additionally slammed his father's comments on being a "family man", claiming Herschel Walker "left us to bang a bunch of women, threatened to kill us, and had us move over 6 times in 6 months running from violence", additionally revealing that Herschel Walker's family had never wanted him to run for office.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=McCaffrey |first1=Shannon |last2=Bluestein |first2=Greg |title=Herschel Walker's campaign in turmoil as adult son accuses him of violence, lying |language=English |work=The Atlanta Journal-Constitution |url=https://www.ajc.com/politics/herschel-walker-pledges-to-sue-over-abortion-claim/RLTO2CSSMJDS3MPG3SZEZLQAMM/ |access-date=2022-10-07 |issn=1539-7459 |archive-date=October 4, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221004021852/https://www.ajc.com/politics/herschel-walker-pledges-to-sue-over-abortion-claim/RLTO2CSSMJDS3MPG3SZEZLQAMM/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Milligan |first=Susan |date=October 4, 2022 |title=Herschel Walker Abortion Story Could Be the Last Straw for the Controversial Georgia Senate Candidate |url=https://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2022-10-04/herschel-walker-abortion-story-could-be-the-last-straw-for-the-controversial-georgia-senate-candidate |access-date=October 7, 2022 |website=USNews}}</ref>{{Update needed|date=October 2024|reason=Was it considered an october surprise in hindsight?}}

== 2024: Harris vs. Trump ==
{{Main|2024 United States presidential election|2024 Trump rally at Madison Square Garden}}
<!--DO NOT ADD something just because it happened in October and it "surprised" you. Only add entries if WP:RS describe it as an October surprise. Otherwise, you are engaged in original research.-->
On October 27, at ], comedian ] described ] as a "floating island of garbage", which has been described as an October surprise by some commentators as it could have an impact on ] especially in Pennsylvania, a key battleground state, which has half a million Puerto Ricans.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Stokols |first1=Eli |last2=Schneider |first2=Elena |last3=Egan |first3=Lauren |last4=Johansen |first4=Ben |title='For Puerto Ricans, this is our October surprise' |url=https://www.politico.com/newsletters/west-wing-playbook/2024/10/28/for-puerto-ricans-this-is-our-october-surprise-00185872 |access-date=October 28, 2024 |website=]|date=October 28, 2024 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Landman |first=Todd |date=2024-10-28 |title=US election: Puerto Rican voters could deliver Donald Trump an unwelcome 'October surprise' |url=https://theconversation.com/us-election-puerto-rican-voters-could-deliver-donald-trump-an-unwelcome-october-surprise-242326 |access-date=2024-10-29 |website=] |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4958098-the-memo-trump-campaign-struggles-to-contain-puerto-rico-october-surprise/|title=The Memo:Trump campaign struggles to contain Puerto Rico October surprise|date=October 29, 2024|access-date=October 29, 2024|website=The Hill|first1=Niall|last1=Stanage}}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Popli |first=Nik |date=2024-10-28 |title=How a Racist Joke About Puerto Rico Could Impact the Election |url=https://time.com/7113564/puerto-rico-racist-joke-trump-rally-election/ |access-date=2024-11-04 |magazine=TIME |language=en}}</ref> A poll among Latino voters in Pennsylvania showed that 69% of respondents found the joke to be “more racist than humorous” while 51% indicated that the remarks at the Trump rally influenced their voting preference towards Harris.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Haner |first=Joanne |date=2024-11-04 |title=Kamala Harris leading Donald Trump by 34 points among Pennsylvania Latinos |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4969723-trump-harris-latino-voters-pennsylvania/ |access-date=2024-11-04 |website=The Hill |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Garcia-Rios |first=Sergio |date=November 3, 2024 |title=Univision Poll: More than 60% of Latino voters in Pennsylvania support Kamala Harris amid the controversy over calling Puerto Rico a "floating island of garbage" at a Trump rally |url=https://www.univision.com/noticias/elecciones-en-estados-unidos-2024/yougov-univision-poll-pennsylvania-latino-voters-show-strong-support-for-kamala-harris-amid-controversial-trump-rally-remarks |access-date=November 4, 2024 |website=Univision}}</ref> Trump would go on to win both the ] and the general election overall, becoming the ].

<!--DO NOT ADD something just because it happened in October and it "surprised" you. Only add entries if WP:RS describe it as an October surprise. Otherwise, you are engaged in original research.-->
== See also ==
* ]
* ]

=== Related works or historical examples ===
* '']'', a film about a fictional war to distract attention from a presidential scandal
* ], a forgery which influenced the ]
* '']'', a novel and film describing a fictional war started solely to distract attention from a presidential scandal
* ], a forgery which influenced the ]

== References ==
{{Reflist|30em|refs=
<ref name="trump tweeted">Multiple sources:
* {{Cite news |last1=Grynbaum |first1=Michael M. |last2=Chokshi |first2=Niraj |date=November 5, 2018 |title=Even Fox News Stops Running Trump Caravan Ad Criticized as Racist |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/05/us/politics/nbc-caravan-advertisement.html |access-date=February 4, 2019 |work=The New York Times }}
* {{Cite news |last=Horsley |first=Scott |date=October 23, 2018 |title=FACT CHECK: President Trump's Claims On Migrant Caravan, Tax Cuts |url=https://www.npr.org/2018/10/23/659917659/fact-check-president-trumps-false-claims-on-migrant-caravan-tax-cuts |access-date=February 4, 2019 |work=NPR |archive-date=February 2, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190202090331/https://www.npr.org/2018/10/23/659917659/fact-check-president-trumps-false-claims-on-migrant-caravan-tax-cuts |url-status=live }}
* {{Cite web |last=Valverde |first=Miriam |title=Donald Trump says Democrats invite migrant caravans |url=https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/nov/01/donald-trump/donald-trump-falsely-says-democrats-invite-migrant/ |access-date=February 4, 2019 |website=PolitiFact }}
* {{Cite news |last=Qiu |first=Linda |date=November 3, 2018 |title=Fact-Checking Trump's Montana Rally |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/03/us/politics/fact-check-trump-rally.html |access-date=February 4, 2019 |work=The New York Times |archive-date=February 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190227190229/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/03/us/politics/fact-check-trump-rally.html |url-status=live }}
* {{Cite news |last=Serwer |first=Adam |date=October 28, 2018 |title=Trump's Caravan Hysteria Led to This |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/10/caravan-lie-sparked-massacre-american-jews/574213/ |access-date=February 4, 2019 |work=The Atlantic |archive-date=October 28, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181028194312/https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/10/caravan-lie-sparked-massacre-american-jews/574213/ |url-status=live }}
* {{Cite web |last=Kessler |first=Glenn |title=Analysis &#124; The Trump administration's fuzzy math on 'criminals' in the caravan |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/11/09/trump-administrations-fuzzy-math-criminals-caravan/ |newspaper=The Washington Post |access-date=November 13, 2018 |archive-date=November 13, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181113011813/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/11/09/trump-administrations-fuzzy-math-criminals-caravan/ |url-status=live }}</ref>

<ref name="republican tv advert">Multiple sources:
* {{Cite news |last1=Stelter |first1=Brian |last2=Darcy |first2=Oliver |title=NBC and Fox finally stop running Trump's racist ad after it was viewed by millions |url=https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/05/media/nbc-trump-immigration-ad/index.html |access-date=February 4, 2019 |work=CNN }}
* {{cite magazine|url=https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-ad-racist-fox-news-752086/|title=Trump's New Ad Is Too Racist for Fox News|first1=Ryan|last1=Bort|date=November 5, 2018|magazine=Rolling Stone|access-date=February 4, 2019|archive-date=March 8, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190308095045/https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-ad-racist-fox-news-752086/|url-status=live}}
* {{cite news|url=https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-runs-racist-ad-on-facebook-targeting-arizona-and-florida|title=Facebook Pulls Racist Trump Ad Following NBC, CNN, and Fox News|first=Lachlan|last=Markay|date=November 5, 2018|website=The Daily Beast|access-date=February 4, 2019|archive-date=July 30, 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240730154110/https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-runs-racist-ad-on-facebook-targeting-arizona-and-florida|url-status=live}}
* {{cite news|url=https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/11/5/18065880/nbc-racist-trump-ad-sunday-night-football|title=Fox News, NBC, and Facebook pulled Trump's racist campaign ad. He's not happy about it.|first=Emily|last=Stewart|date=November 5, 2018|website=Vox|access-date=February 4, 2019}}
* {{cite news|url=https://www.businessinsider.com/the-media-rejected-trumps-racist-ad-in-an-unprecedented-way-2018-11|title=The media rejected Trump's 'racist,' misleading ad in an unprecedented way|first=Eliza|last=Relman|website=Business Insider|access-date=February 4, 2019|archive-date=July 30, 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240730154208/https://www.businessinsider.com/the-media-rejected-trumps-racist-ad-in-an-unprecedented-way-2018-11|url-status=live}}</ref> }}
*



{{United States presidential elections}}

]
]
]

Latest revision as of 01:46, 21 December 2024

Event that may influence US election

This article is about the term in U.S. politics. For the storm in Buffalo, New York, see Lake Storm Aphid.

In the politics of the United States, an October surprise is a news event that may influence the outcome of an upcoming November election (particularly one for the presidency), whether deliberately planned or spontaneously occurring. Because the date for national elections (as well as many state and local elections) is in early November, events that take place in October have greater potential to influence the decisions of prospective voters and allow less time to take remedial action; thus, relatively last-minute news stories could either change the course of an election or reinforce the inevitable.

The term "October surprise" was coined by William Casey when he served as campaign manager of Ronald Reagan's 1980 presidential campaign; however, there were October election-upending events that predated the coining of the term.

Prior to 1980

19th century

In mid-October 1840, shortly before the 1840 presidential election, federal prosecutors announced plans to charge top Whig Party officials with "most stupendous and atrocious fraud" for paying Pennsylvanians to cross state lines and vote for Whig candidates in New York during the 1838 elections.

In 1844, an abolitionist newspaper published an article, purportedly based on a book titled Roorback's Tour Through the Southern and Western States in the Year 1836, implying that James K. Polk had his slaves branded. For some decades afterward, a practice similar to the modern "October surprise", in which the occurrence turned out to be untrue, was called "roorbacking" or "roorbaching".

On October 20, 1880, shortly before the 1880 presidential election, a forged letter was published purportedly written by James A. Garfield voicing support for Chinese immigration to the United States. At the time, most white Americans opposed Chinese immigration and both presidential candidates were in favor of immigration restrictions.

In the week leading up to the 1884 presidential election, Republican nominee James G. Blaine attended a meeting in which Presbyterian preacher Samuel D. Burchard claimed that the Democrats were the party of "Rum, Romanism, and Rebellion". Blaine's failure to object to Burchard's message cost him support from anti-prohibitionists, Roman Catholic immigrants, and southerners, playing a role in his narrow loss to Democratic candidate Grover Cleveland.

Two weeks before the 1888 presidential election, the Republicans published a letter by Lionel Sackville-West, the British ambassador to the United States. In the letter, Sackville-West suggested that Democratic presidential candidate Grover Cleveland was preferred as president from the British point of view. The letter had a galvanizing effect on Irish-American voters exactly comparable to the "Rum, Romanism, and Rebellion" blunder of the previous presidential election by trumpeting Great Britain's support for the Democrats. That drove Irish-American voters into the Republican fold, and Cleveland lost the presidency to Republican candidate Benjamin Harrison.

20th century

In the weeks leading up to the 1920 presidential election, rumors circulated that Warren G. Harding was of African-American descent. Harding's campaign feared that the rumor would affect his popularity amongst white southerners and so his campaign made it a point to prove Harding's whiteness.

Less than a month before the 1940 presidential election, President Roosevelt's press secretary Stephen Early kneed a black police officer in the groin outside Madison Square Garden. Roosevelt had already been facing skepticism from black voters because of his failure to desegregate the military. Roosevelt responded days before the election by appointing the nation's first black general, Benjamin O. Davis Sr., and announcing the creation of the Tuskegee Airmen.

The Suez Crisis and Hungarian Revolution have both been described as October surprises during the 1956 presidential election.

On October 7, 1964, just under a month before the 1964 presidential election, one of President Johnson's top aides, Walter Jenkins, was arrested for disorderly conduct with another man at the Washington D.C. YMCA, a place described by the Toledo Blade as "so notorious a gathering place of homosexuals that the District police had long since staked it out with peepholes for surveillance". A week later, Nikita Khrushchev was ousted from power by hardliners in the Soviet Union, the Labour Party won the United Kingdom election, and China conducted its first nuclear weapons test.

During the 1968 presidential election, Hubert Humphrey—who was rising sharply in the polls due to the collapse of the George Wallace vote—began to distance himself publicly from the Johnson administration on the Vietnam War, calling for a bombing halt. The key turning point for Humphrey's campaign came when President Johnson officially announced a bombing halt, and even a possible peace deal, the weekend before the election. The "Halloween Peace" gave Humphrey's campaign a badly needed boost. In addition, Senator Eugene McCarthy finally endorsed Humphrey in late October after previously refusing to do so, and by election day the polls were reporting a dead heat. However, Nixon won the election in a close race.

During the 1972 presidential election between the Republican incumbent Richard Nixon and the Democratic nominee George McGovern, the United States was in the fourth year of negotiations to end the lengthy and domestically divisive Vietnam War. On October 26, 1972, twelve days before the election on November 7, the United States' chief negotiator and presidential National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger appeared at a press conference held at the White House and announced "We believe that peace is at hand." Nixon, despite having vowed to end the war during his presidential election campaign four years earlier, had failed to cease hostilities but had withdrawn all American ground combat units and most other American military personnel. While Nixon was nevertheless already widely considered to be assured of re-election, Kissinger's "peace is at hand" declaration increased Nixon's already high standing with the electorate: in the event, Nixon defeated McGovern in every state except Massachusetts and won by 23.2 points in the nationwide popular vote, which was the largest margin since 1936. Remaining U.S. military personnel were withdrawn in 1973, but U.S. involvement in Vietnam continued until 1975.

1980: Carter vs. Reagan

Main articles: 1980 United States presidential election and 1980 October Surprise theory

Origin of term

In the 1980 presidential election, Republican challenger Ronald Reagan feared that a last-minute deal to release American hostages held in Iran might earn incumbent Jimmy Carter enough votes to win re-election. As it happened, in the days prior to the election, press coverage was consumed with the Iranian government's decision—and Carter's simultaneous announcement—that the hostages would not be released until after the election.

William Casey, the manager of the Reagan campaign, was the first person to mention the idea of an "October surprise" to the press. On the morning of July 17, he told the press at the Republican convention that he was concerned that Carter would use the advantage of incumbency to spring an event that would benefit him politically. Casey mentioned that Carter had done this during the Wisconsin primary—in reference to Carter's announcement on election morning that he had "good news" concerning the hostages. Casey mentioned to the press that he was setting up an "intelligence operation" to monitor Carter's political activities to keep abreast of such a possibility.

The intelligence operation the Reagan campaign set up was extensive. It used military contacts at key air force bases to keep track of military flight movement which could be used to gauge government action concerning the hostages. The operation had also compiled a list of the embargoed military equipment that the U.S. government had of the Iranians that Carter could use to barter in exchange for the release of the hostages. To keep abreast of international information concerning the hostages, the Reagan campaign tapped former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and his extensive network of international contacts.

The Reagan campaign's ominous warnings of a possible October surprise to the press was done for strategic reasons. It was intended to prepare the voters, so that if some good October news happened, the voters would look at the event as a political ploy by the Carter campaign to win the election. Personal papers left by Joseph V. Reed Jr. indicate that the "team" around David Rockefeller, the chairman of Chase Bank, "collaborated closely with the Reagan campaign in its efforts to pre-empt and discourage what it derisively labeled an 'October surprise'—a pre-election release of the American hostages, the papers show. The Chase team helped the Reagan campaign gather and spread rumors about possible payoffs to win the release, a propaganda effort that Carter administration officials have said impeded talks to free the captives." Rockefeller, a lifelong Republican, assisted the Reagan campaign because he had a negative view on Carter's dovish foreign policy, and also because Chase Bank's balance sheet held $360 million (equivalent to $1.12 billion in 2023) in loans to Iran and more than $500 million (equivalent to $1.55 billion in 2023) in frozen Iranian deposits.

Jack Anderson wrote an article in The Washington Post in the fall of 1980 about a possible October surprise, in which he alleged that the Carter administration was preparing a major military operation in Iran for rescuing U.S. hostages in order to help him get re-elected. Subsequent allegations surfaced against Reagan alleging that his team had actively impeded the hostage release.

Secret deal accusation

After the release of the hostages on January 20, 1981, minutes after Reagan's inauguration, some charged that the Reagan campaign had made a secret deal with the Iranian government whereby the Iranians would hold the hostages until after Reagan was elected and inaugurated. Gary Sick, member of the U.S. National Security Council under Presidents Ford and Carter (before being relieved of his duties weeks into Reagan's term), made the accusation in a New York Times editorial in the run-up to the 1992 election. The initial bipartisan response from Congress was skeptical: House Democrats refused to authorize an inquiry, and Senate Republicans denied a $600,000 appropriation for a probe. Eight former hostages also sent an open letter demanding an inquiry in 1991. In subsequent Congressional testimony, Sick said that the popular media had distorted and misrepresented the accusers, reducing them to "gross generalizations" and "generic conspiracy theorists". Sick penned a book on the subject and sold the film rights to it for a reported $300,000. His sources and thesis were contested by a number of commentators on both sides of the aisle.

Abolhassan Banisadr, the former President of Iran, has also stated "that the Reagan campaign struck a deal with Tehran to delay the release of the hostages in 1980", asserting that "by the month before the American Presidential election in November 1980, many in Iran's ruling circles were openly discussing the fact that a deal had been made between the Reagan campaign team and some Iranian religious leaders in which the hostages' release would be delayed until after the election so as to prevent President Carter's re-election." He repeated the charge in My Turn to Speak: Iran, the Revolution & Secret Deals with the U.S. Former Lieutenant Governor of Texas Ben Barnes asserts that during the 1980 election campaign, he accompanied Connally on a trip through several Middle Eastern capitals, during which Connally consistently conveyed to regional leaders that they should inform the Iranian government that Iran should wait to release American hostages until after the election. Upon their return to the U.S., Barnes claims that Connally briefed Casey on their trip in an airport lounge.

Four people identified by Barnes confirmed to a reporter for The New York Times that Barnes had conveyed these incidents to them in the years before Barnes went public with his story: Mark K. Updegrove, former director of the Lyndon Baines Johnson Library and Museum; Tom Johnson, one of LBJ's aides; Larry Temple, one of Connally's and Johnson's aides; and H.W. Brands, an historian at the University of Texas. Moreover, Brands wrote about Barnes's story in his 2015 biography of Reagan, although the account went largely unnoticed at the time; however, The New York Times also observed that "Confirming Mr. Barnes's account is problematic" and the fact that John Connally III said he was with his father when he briefed Reagan about the trip, and nothing on this subject was discussed.

Barbara Honegger, a 1980 Reagan–Bush campaign staffer and later a Reagan White House policy analyst, claims to have discovered information that made her believe that George H. W. Bush and William Casey had conspired to assure that Iran would not free the U.S. hostages until Jimmy Carter had been defeated in the 1980 presidential election, and she alleges that arms sales to Iran were a part of that bargain. Two separate congressional investigations looked into the charges, both concluding that there was no plan to seek to delay the hostages' release.

1992: Bush vs. Clinton

Main article: 1992 United States presidential election

In June 1992, Ronald Reagan's Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger was indicted in the Iran–Contra affair. Although he claims to have been opposed to the sale on principle, Weinberger participated in the transfer of United States TOW missiles to Iran that were used to stop Saddam Hussein's massive tank army, and was later indicted on several felony charges of lying to the Iran-Contra independent counsel during its investigation. Republicans angrily accused Independent Counsel Lawrence E. Walsh of timing Weinberger's indictment to hurt George H. W. Bush's re-election chances. Throughout the campaign as Weinberger's trial approached, more concrete information on Bush's direct role emerged, including statements by Reagan Middle East specialist Howard Teicher that Bush knew of the arms deal in spring 1986 and an Israeli memo that made it clear that Bush was well versed in the deal by July 1986.

2000: Gore vs. Bush

Main article: 2000 United States presidential election

Days before the November 7 election, Thomas J. Connolly of Scarborough, Maine, a prominent defense attorney and 1998 Democratic candidate for governor, confirmed to a reporter that Republican presidential candidate George W. Bush had been arrested for drunk driving in that state in 1976. Bush confirmed the report in a press conference moments after it was revealed.

2003: California governor recall election

Main article: 2003 California gubernatorial recall election

On October 2, 2003, the Los Angeles Times released a story about Arnold Schwarzenegger and subsequent allegations that he was a womanizer guilty of multiple acts of sexual misconduct in past decades. The story was released just before the 2003 California recall (which was scheduled for October 7), prompting many pundits to charge that the timing of the story was aimed specifically at derailing the recall campaign. It was not the only embarrassing story about Schwarzenegger to surface just days before the campaign: the next day, ABC News and The New York Times reported that in 1975 Schwarzenegger had praised Adolf Hitler during interviews for the film Pumping Iron, which was responsible for the bodybuilder-turned-actor's fame. The twin controversies later led Los Angeles Times columnist Steve Lopez to coin the term "gropenfuhrer" to describe California's governor-elect (a compounded pun on the Nazi paramilitary rank Gruppenführer and the words to grope and Führer); a series of Doonesbury strips made the term famous.

2004: Bush vs. Kerry

Main article: 2004 United States presidential election

On October 27, The New York Times reported the disappearance of a huge cache of explosives from a warehouse in al Qa'qaa (the missing explosives in Iraq). The John Kerry campaign blamed the Bush administration for this supposed mismanagement; administration officials charged that the Times had gotten the story wrong, and that the explosives had been cleared from the storage facility before the looting was supposed to have taken place.

On October 29, the Arabic news agency Al Jazeera aired a video of Osama bin Laden. In a speech that justified and took responsibility for the actions of September 11, bin Laden called out the Bush administration and the American position in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Bin Laden was quoted as saying: "Your security does not lie in the hands of Kerry, Bush, or al-Qaeda. Your security is in your own hands." This is believed to have helped President Bush's campaign as it thrust the War on Terror back into the public eye. There is debate as to whether bin Laden was aware of the effect the video would have on the elections; the "Bush bounce" from the video did not surprise most outside observers of the 2004 election. It has been claimed that Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan Al Saud cut the price of oil (thus reducing gas prices) to help ensure a Bush victory. According to a 60 Minutes broadcast, "Prince Bandar enjoys easy access to the Oval Office. His family and the Bush family are close. And Woodward told us that Bandar has promised the president that Saudi Arabia will lower oil prices in the months before the election to ensure the U.S. economy is strong on Election Day."

2006 midterm elections

Main article: 2006 United States elections

Two studies by The Lancet on mortality in Iraq before and after the 2003 invasion of Iraq have been described as October surprises for the 2004 and 2006 elections. Les Roberts acknowledged that the 2004 study was timed to appear just before the presidential election, though he denied that it was meant to favor one candidate over another. Although the studies used standard epidemiological methods, was peer-reviewed and supported by a majority of statisticians and epidemiologists, political critics have dismissed the studies based on a variety of alleged shortcomings.

The Mark Foley scandal, in which the congressman resigned over sexual computer messages that he exchanged with underage congressional pages, broke on September 28, 2006, and dominated the news in early October. Bloomberg.com wrote, "The October surprise came early this election year...." Allegations that both Republicans and Democrats had knowledge of Foley's actions months before the breaking of the story only fueled the speculation regarding the possibly politically motivated timing of the story's release.

News that the Saddam Hussein trial verdict would be rendered on November 5, 2006, just two days ahead of the U.S. midterm elections, led Tom Engelhardt of magazine The Nation to dub it, on October 17, the "November Surprise". In a White House Press gaggle on November 4, 2006, a reporter suggested that the timing of the verdict might be an attempt to influence the outcome of the November election, to which White House Press Secretary Tony Snow replied "Are you smoking rope?" Snow later told CNN's Late Edition, "The idea is preposterous, that somehow we've been scheming and plotting with the Iraqis".

2008: McCain vs. Obama

Main article: 2008 United States presidential election

On October 31, 2008, four days before the 2008 presidential election, the Associated Press reported that Zeituni Onyango, half-aunt of Democratic candidate Barack Obama, was living as an illegal immigrant in Boston. She had been denied asylum and ordered to leave the United States in 2004.

Some have also described the stock market crash and October 2008 record rise in unemployment as an "October Surprise", although the downturn in the American and global stock markets started in September.

2012: Obama vs. Romney

Main article: 2012 United States presidential election

Hurricane Sandy was labeled the October surprise by some in the media at the time, though there some researchers found no evidence that it impacted the outcome of the election after the fact.

2014 midterm elections

Main article: 2014 United States elections

The Ebola virus epidemic was considered an October surprise by some media outlets.

2016: Clinton vs. Trump

Main article: 2016 United States presidential election

Access Hollywood tape

On October 7, a recording from 2005 was released in which Republican Party nominee Donald Trump, using explicit language in a conversation with Access Hollywood anchor Billy Bush (nephew of Republican President George H. W. Bush and first cousin of Republican President George W. Bush and his brother, Republican former Florida governor and 2016 primary candidate Jeb Bush), stated "when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything... Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything." Several politicians from both major parties expressed their disapproval of these remarks. Trump, who had been accused of sexism on several occasions before, later apologized for these remarks, saying they "don't reflect who I am".

The remarks led to many Republicans withdrawing their endorsement from Trump including Arizona Senator John McCain, New Hampshire Senator Kelly Ayotte, and Carly Fiorina. Many others who had not previously endorsed him asked him to step aside as the Republican nominee, including former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

WikiLeaks

See also: Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections

Also on October 7, WikiLeaks began a two-month campaign of releasing emails and excerpts from the account of John Podesta. They would later become known as the Podesta Leaks. They shed a negative light on Democratic Party nominee Hillary Clinton and included recordings of excerpts of speeches given by Clinton to a variety of banks, a debate question being leaked to Clinton prior to the debate, a stance on trade-deals different from those purported by Clinton during her campaign, along with her belief that it is beneficial to hold both public and private beliefs.

James Comey investigation

Three weeks later, on October 28, then-FBI Director James Comey announced in a letter to Congress that he would take "appropriate investigative steps" to review additional emails related to Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server. This was announced after newly discovered emails were found on a computer that was seized by the FBI during an investigation of former congressman Anthony Weiner who had been accused of sending explicit pictures to a minor. According to law enforcement officials, the emails were found on a computer used by both Weiner and his then-wife, top Clinton aide Huma Abedin. Several hours later, Hillary Clinton responded to the decision of the Director by calling on the FBI to be fully transparent and to release "full and complete facts" on what the emails contained. On October 30, it was reported that 650,000 emails on Weiner's computer were to be investigated, potentially being relevant to this particular and other cases. Almost all ended up being duplicates, and when Comey revealed that the investigation found nothing on November 6th, some Clinton aides later worried that it put the emails back in the news cycle two days before the election. Comey also received criticism for only publicly disclosing the Clinton email investigations and keeping quiet about the investigations into Russian attempts to boost Donald Trump. A 2018 inspector general report of the decision to reopen the investigation in October described it as "a serious error in judgment". Daniel Drezner argued it was the greatest October surprise of the modern presidency.

2018 midterm elections

Main article: 2018 United States elections

A caravan of migrants from Central America became the "October surprise" of 2018. President Trump tweeted information about the caravan, and later released a Republican television advertisement that many criticized as racist (Fox News, NBC, and Facebook removed the advertisement after they deemed it racist and CNN refused to air it). The story dominated discussion on many news networks, with many pundits criticizing Trump. News host Shepard Smith said on his Fox News show that the migrant caravan "hysteria" was actually intended to stoke fear before the midterm election and ridiculed Trump's claims.

2020: Trump vs. Biden

Main articles: 2020 United States presidential election, Tax returns of Donald Trump § 2020 New York Times reporting, White House COVID-19 outbreak, Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory, and Unmasking by U.S. intelligence agencies § Unmasking aides to Donald Trump
This section appears to be slanted towards recent events. In particular, the sources cited are from the day or two after the event. There should be analysis from after the election to confirm whether or not it was an October surprise. Please try to keep recent events in historical perspective and add more content related to non-recent events. (October 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

On October 2, Trump announced that he and Melania Trump had tested positive for COVID-19. This was considered by some the day after the event to be an October surprise, and this positive diagnosis was a part of a larger outbreak that occurred in the White House in October 2020, and had been traced back to the fast-tracked ceremony to announce Amy Coney Barrett as the successor to Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Supreme Court seat. The event has been described by infectious disease expert Anthony Fauci as a "super spreader" event which reportedly infected over 30 people, including senior White House officials. The Economist argued that the polling shift from the COVID case erased before election day, arguing it was likely not an October surprise.

An October 14 article by the New York Post related to emails found on an external hard drive of a laptop computer belonging to Joe Biden's son Hunter was considered to be an October surprise, however NBC News described it as a "failed one".

2022 midterm elections

Main article: 2022 United States elections

On October 3, 2022, The Daily Beast reported that former football player Herschel Walker, the Republican nominee in the 2022 United States Senate election in Georgia, paid for his wife's 2009 abortion despite claiming to be "100% pro-life". Walker's son Christian, who has a large following as a right-wing social media influencer, additionally stated that the woman whose abortion Walker paid for was Christian's mother. Christian Walker additionally slammed his father's comments on being a "family man", claiming Herschel Walker "left us to bang a bunch of women, threatened to kill us, and had us move over 6 times in 6 months running from violence", additionally revealing that Herschel Walker's family had never wanted him to run for office.

2024: Harris vs. Trump

Main articles: 2024 United States presidential election and 2024 Trump rally at Madison Square Garden

On October 27, at a Trump rally at Madison Square Garden, comedian Tony Hinchcliffe described Puerto Rico as a "floating island of garbage", which has been described as an October surprise by some commentators as it could have an impact on Puerto Rican voters especially in Pennsylvania, a key battleground state, which has half a million Puerto Ricans. A poll among Latino voters in Pennsylvania showed that 69% of respondents found the joke to be “more racist than humorous” while 51% indicated that the remarks at the Trump rally influenced their voting preference towards Harris. Trump would go on to win both the state of Pennsylvania and the general election overall, becoming the President-elect of the United States.

See also

Related works or historical examples

References

  1. ^ Gee, Taylor (October 4, 2016). "15 October Surprises That Wreaked Havoc on Politics". Politico Magazine. Archived from the original on November 26, 2020. Retrieved July 16, 2020.
  2. ^ Keller, Jared (October 11, 2016). "The Strange History of the October Surprise". Smithsonian. Archived from the original on September 7, 2020. Retrieved July 16, 2020.
  3. ^ Gee, Taylor (October 4, 2016). "15 October Surprises That Wreaked Havoc on Politics". Politico Magazine. Archived from the original on November 26, 2020. Retrieved July 16, 2020.
  4. Mark E. Byrnes, James K. Polk: A Biographical Companion (ABC-CLIO: New York, 2001), pp.182-3
  5. "The Atlantic". Boston. September 9, 1857. p. 181 – via Internet Archive. An illustration of the change that has taken place within a very few years may be seen in the history of the campaign lie, known in American politics as the ' roorbach.' The name first became current in 1844, when a mendacious statement, purporting to lie taken from Roorbach's Tour through the Western and Southern States was published wild the intent to destroy Mr. Polk's chances for the presidency. Under conditions then existing, it was thought safe to launch this falsehood two months before the election. By 1880, when the Morey letter was sprung upon Garfield, the expectancy of life for the roorbach had been reduced to two weeks.
  6. "That 'Murchison' Letter. The Alleged Correspondent Of Lord Sackville. A California Man Says He Entrapped The British Minister And Wants Harrison To Know It". New York Times. January 9, 1889. Retrieved July 19, 2010. George Osgoodby, author of the famous 'Murchison' letter, has lived at Pomona 15 years. He came to California from New-York when a boy, and has worked on farms during the greater part of his residence in California.
  7. Charles W. Calhoun, Minority Victory: Gilded Age Politics and the Front Porch Campaign of 1888 (2008).
  8. Gage, Beverly (April 6, 2008). "Our First Black President?". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 10, 2008. Retrieved October 16, 2020.
  9. Cronkite, Walter (October 23, 2006). "A Huge 'October Surprise', 50 Years Later". All Things Considered. NPR. Archived from the original on October 15, 2021. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
  10. Theodore H. White, The Making of the President, 1968 (1970)
  11. Kissinger 2003:591
  12. Timms, Ed. "Unresolved issues make decision hard". Morning Star. Wilmington, North Carolina. p. 1. Archived from the original on October 9, 2021. Retrieved February 4, 2019 – via Google News Archive.
  13. ^ "John McCain and the October Surprise". The New York Observer. Archived from the original on October 12, 2008. Retrieved January 27, 2009. The term "October surprise" is most famously associated with the 1980 campaign, when Republicans spent the fall worrying that Jimmy Carter would engineer a last-minute deal to free the American hostages who had been held in Iran since the previous year. Carter and Ronald Reagan were locked in a close race, but an awful economy and flagging national confidence made the president supremely vulnerable.
  14. ^ Lewis, Neil A. (January 13, 1993). "House Inquiry Finds No Evidence of Deal On Hostages in 1980". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 1, 2019. Retrieved September 21, 2014. A bipartisan House panel has concluded that there is no merit to the persistent accusations that people associated with the 1980 Presidential campaign of Ronald Reagan struck a secret deal with Iran to delay the release of American hostages until after the election.
  15. ^ Germond, Jack; Witcover, Jules (1981). Blue smoke and mirrors : how Reagan won and why Carter lost the election of 1980. New York: Viking. ISBN 978-0-670-51383-3.
  16. ^ Campell, Don (July 17, 1980). "GOP's 'incumbency watch' to eye Carter campaign". San Bernardino Sun. Gannett News Service. Archived from the original on January 13, 2021. Retrieved January 11, 2021.
  17. United States Congress House Committee on Post Office and Civil Service Subcommittee on Human Services (1984). "Chapter 3 Section III: The October Surprise". Unauthorized Transfers of Nonpublic Information During the 1980 Presidential Election: Report (Report). U.S. Government Printing Office. Archived from the original on August 25, 2024. Retrieved January 11, 2021.
  18. ^ Johnston, Louis; Williamson, Samuel H. (2023). "What Was the U.S. GDP Then?". MeasuringWorth. Retrieved November 30, 2023. United States Gross Domestic Product deflator figures follow the MeasuringWorth series.
  19. Kirkpatrick, David D. (December 29, 2019). "How a Chase Bank Chairman Helped the Deposed Shah of Iran Enter the U.S." The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on December 29, 2019. Retrieved January 19, 2020.
  20. Lenahan, Rod (1998). Crippled Eagle: A Historical Perspective Of U.S. Special Operations 1976–1996. Narwhal Press. p. 178. ISBN 1-886391-23-8.
  21. "SIPA: Faculty Gary Sick". Sipa.columbia.edu. Archived from the original on August 4, 2010. Retrieved November 18, 2010.
  22. ^ Gary Sick (April 15, 1991). "The Election Story of the Decade". The New York Times. reprinted in "Creating a Task Force to Investigate Certain Allegations Concerning the Holding of Americans as Hostages by Iran in 1980 (House of Representatives - February 05, 1992)". Fas.org. Retrieved November 18, 2010.
  23. Dreifus, Claudia (January 24, 1992). "Himself Surprised". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on August 25, 2024. Retrieved November 18, 2010.
  24. Michael Ledeen (June 1, 1992). "October Surprise, by Gary Sick". Commentary. Archived from the original on August 18, 2010. Retrieved November 18, 2010.
  25. Daniel Pipes (January 1, 2003). "The 'October Surprise' Theory". Daniel Pipes. Archived from the original on July 1, 2009. Retrieved November 18, 2010.
  26. Lewis, Neil A. (May 7, 1991). "Bani-Sadr, in U.S., Renews Charges of 1980 Deal". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 23, 2009. Retrieved November 18, 2010.
  27. Abolhassan Banisadr. My Turn to Speak: Iran, the Revolution and Secret Deals With the U.S. Archived June 14, 2011, at the Wayback Machine. From a series of interviews with Jean-Charles Deniau. Foreword by L. Bruce Laingen. Washington, D.C.: Potomac Books, 1991. ISBN 0-08-040563-0. Translation of Abol Hassan Bani Sadr. Le complot des ayatollahs. Propos recueillis par Jean-Charles Deniau. Paris: La Découverte, 1989.
  28. ^ Baker, Peter (March 18, 2023). "A Four-Decade Secret: One Man's Story of Sabotaging Carter's Re-election". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 18, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
  29. Honegger, Barbara (1989). October surprise. New York: Tudor. ISBN 978-0-944276-46-4 – via Internet Archive.
  30. Troy, Gil (October 24, 2013). Morning in America: How Ronald Reagan Invented the 1980s. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1-4008-4930-7.
  31. Johnston, David (June 17, 1992). "Weinberger Faces 5 Counts In Iran-Contra Indictment". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 9, 2021. Retrieved February 4, 2019.
  32. "Walsh Iran / Contra Report". fas.org. Archived from the original on April 17, 2009. Retrieved October 16, 2020.
  33. ^ Greenfield, Jeff (October 15, 2024). "The October Surprise May Be Arriving Shortly". Politico.
  34. Johnston, David (October 4, 1992). "Years Later, Questions Remain About Bush's Role in the Iran-Contra Affair". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 4, 2019. Retrieved February 4, 2019.
  35. "Mr. Bush Had to Know". The New York Times. October 5, 1992. Archived from the original on February 4, 2019. Retrieved February 4, 2019.
  36. Adam Cohen (November 13, 2000). "Fallout From A Midnight Ride". Time. Retrieved March 6, 2020.
  37. "CBS eyed '60 Minutes' Bush bombshell". The Washington Times. October 27, 2004. Retrieved November 18, 2010.
  38. "Arnold Allegedly Praised Hitler in 1975 Interview". Fox News. October 3, 2003. Archived from the original on July 26, 2008. Retrieved August 22, 2008.
  39. Steve Lopez (October 8, 2003). "Der Gropenfuhrer Muscles His Way Into Office – So What Now?". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on July 8, 2020. Retrieved November 18, 2010.
  40. "Excerpts: Bin Laden video". BBC News. October 29, 2004. Archived from the original on September 12, 2017. Retrieved November 18, 2010.
  41. "Saudis said to boost oil output". Money.cnn.com. April 19, 2004. Archived from the original on September 26, 2011. Retrieved November 18, 2010.
  42. "Did Bush Cut Secret Oil Deal With Saudis Ahead of 2004 Election?". Democracy Now. April 20, 2004. Archived from the original on November 17, 2010. Retrieved November 18, 2010.
  43. Linton Weeks (October 21, 2006). "Boo!? An Inevitable October Surprise". The Washington Post. Retrieved September 21, 2014.
  44. ^ National Journal, Data Bomb Archived March 24, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
  45. Catherine Dodge; Jay Newton-Small (October 3, 2006). "October Surprise in This Campaign Puts Republicans On the Spot". Bloomberg. Retrieved October 3, 2006.
  46. "Is Foley Scandal the 'October Surprise'?". Fox News. October 6, 2006. Archived from the original on October 16, 2006. Retrieved October 16, 2006.
  47. Tom Engelhardt (October 17, 2006). "November Surprise?". The Nation. Retrieved October 18, 2006.
  48. Christine Hauser (November 5, 2006). "Praising Verdict, Bush Says U.S. Will Stand By Iraq". The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 14, 2016. Retrieved September 21, 2014.
  49. Hsu, Spencer S.; Rakowsky, Judy (November 2, 2008). "Disclosure About Obama's Aunt May Have Violated Privacy Policy". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on November 16, 2017. Retrieved October 31, 2017.
  50. Goodman, Peter S. (November 8, 2008). "Jobless Rate at 14-Year High After October Losses". The New York Times.
  51. Jurek Martin (October 30, 2012). "Frankenstorm generates 'October surprise'". Financial Times. Retrieved September 21, 2014.
  52. Aiko Stevenson (October 30, 2012). "October Surprise Arrives With Less Than a Week to Go". The Huffington Post. Archived from the original on October 7, 2014. Retrieved September 21, 2014.
  53. Hart, Joshua (July 2014). "Did Hurricane Sandy influence the 2012 US presidential election?". Social Science Research. 46: 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.02.005. ISSN 1096-0317. PMID 24767585.
  54. ^ Maza, Carlos (November 5, 2018). "Why every election gets its own crisis". Vox. Archived from the original on July 30, 2024. Retrieved February 4, 2019.
  55. Collinson, Stephen. "Can Donald Trump recover from this?". CNN. Archived from the original on February 4, 2019. Retrieved February 4, 2019.
  56. Tom Liddy (October 7, 2016). "Donald Trump's List of Excuses for Comments About Women". ABC News. Archived from the original on October 8, 2016. Retrieved October 8, 2016.
  57. Claire Cohen (October 8, 2016). "Donald Trump sexism tracker: Every offensive comment in one place". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on June 22, 2016. Retrieved October 8, 2016.
  58. Jamieson, Amber (October 31, 2016). "DNC head leaked debate question to Clinton, Podesta emails suggests". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on July 30, 2024. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
  59. "The real reason the FBI is reviewing more of Hillary Clinton's Emails". Newsweek. October 28, 2016. Archived from the original on October 29, 2016. Retrieved October 29, 2016.
  60. Schleifer, Theodore; Collinson, Stephen (October 28, 2016). "FBI reviewing new emails in Clinton classified information probe". CNN. Archived from the original on October 28, 2016. Retrieved October 28, 2016.
  61. "Oct. 28 FBI letter to congressional leaders on Clinton email investigation". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on October 29, 2016. Retrieved October 29, 2016.
  62. Murray, Mark (August 23, 2017). "12 days that stunned a nation: How Hillary Clinton lost". NBC News. Retrieved October 4, 2024.
  63. ^ Graff, Garrett M. (September 25, 2020). "Review | For Comey, time has not healed a major wound". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved October 4, 2024.
  64. Drezner, Daniel W. (September 9, 2020). "Perspective: Will there be an 'October surprise' in foreign policy?". Washington Post. In campaign parlance, the term 'October surprise' means a news story that breaks late in an election cycle that could tip the balance of the election. Hands down, James B. Comey's 2016 reopening of the FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails is the greatest October surprise of the modern presidency.
  65. Henninger, Daniel (October 24, 2018). "Opinion - The October Surprise Arrives". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved February 4, 2019.
  66. Multiple sources:
  67. Multiple sources:
  68. Shamsian, Jacob (October 29, 2018). "'There is nothing at all to worry about': Fox News host Shep Smith says the migrant caravan hysteria is actually about the midterm election". Business Insider. Archived from the original on February 1, 2019. Retrieved February 4, 2019.
  69. Papenfuss, Mary (October 30, 2018). "Fox News' Shep Smith Ridicules Trump's Migrant Caravan 'Invasion' Claim". HuffPost. Archived from the original on February 3, 2019. Retrieved February 4, 2019.
  70. Baker, Peter (October 2, 2020). "Trump Tests Positive for the Coronavirus". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 16, 2021. Retrieved October 2, 2020.
  71. Gawthorpe, Andrew (October 3, 2020). "Donald Trump's coronavirus infection is the ultimate 'October surprise'". The Guardian. Archived from the original on July 30, 2024. Retrieved October 18, 2020.
  72. Luce, Edward (October 2, 2020). "Trump's coronavirus October surprise". Financial Times. Archived from the original on October 21, 2020. Retrieved October 18, 2020.
  73. Annett, Timothy (October 9, 2020). "Fauci Calls White House Ceremony a 'Super-Spreader Event'". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on August 25, 2024. Retrieved October 18, 2020.
  74. "Could an "October surprise" upset America's election?". The Economist. October 8, 2024. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved October 14, 2024.
  75. "How a fake persona laid the groundwork for a Hunter Biden conspiracy deluge". NBC News. October 30, 2020. Archived from the original on May 13, 2021. Retrieved September 9, 2023.
  76. McCaffrey, Shannon; Bluestein, Greg. "Herschel Walker's campaign in turmoil as adult son accuses him of violence, lying". The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. ISSN 1539-7459. Archived from the original on October 4, 2022. Retrieved October 7, 2022.
  77. Milligan, Susan (October 4, 2022). "Herschel Walker Abortion Story Could Be the Last Straw for the Controversial Georgia Senate Candidate". USNews. Retrieved October 7, 2022.
  78. Stokols, Eli; Schneider, Elena; Egan, Lauren; Johansen, Ben (October 28, 2024). "'For Puerto Ricans, this is our October surprise'". Politico. Retrieved October 28, 2024.
  79. Landman, Todd (October 28, 2024). "US election: Puerto Rican voters could deliver Donald Trump an unwelcome 'October surprise'". The Conversation. Retrieved October 29, 2024.
  80. Stanage, Niall (October 29, 2024). "The Memo:Trump campaign struggles to contain Puerto Rico October surprise". The Hill. Retrieved October 29, 2024.
  81. Popli, Nik (October 28, 2024). "How a Racist Joke About Puerto Rico Could Impact the Election". TIME. Retrieved November 4, 2024.
  82. Haner, Joanne (November 4, 2024). "Kamala Harris leading Donald Trump by 34 points among Pennsylvania Latinos". The Hill. Retrieved November 4, 2024.
  83. Garcia-Rios, Sergio (November 3, 2024). "Univision Poll: More than 60% of Latino voters in Pennsylvania support Kamala Harris amid the controversy over calling Puerto Rico a "floating island of garbage" at a Trump rally". Univision. Retrieved November 4, 2024.


United States presidential elections
Elections by year
Elections by state
Primaries and caucuses
Nominating conventions
Electoral College
and popular vote
Related
Categories: