Misplaced Pages

Peach Bottom Nuclear Generating Station: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:19, 18 March 2016 editTrackteur (talk | contribs)4,708 edits unnecessary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:41, 19 December 2024 edit undoLrg52595 (talk | contribs)3 editsm Updated language to be consistent with previous safety concerns and deleted sentence with broken source linkTag: references removed 
(70 intermediate revisions by 43 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania}}
{{Infobox power station {{Infobox power station
| name = Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station | name = Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station
| name_official =
| image = Peach Bottom Nuclear Generating Station 1974 cropped.jpg
| image = Peach Bottom Nuclear Generating Station 1974 cropped.jpg
| image_caption = Photo of Units 2 and 3 {{circa|1974}}
| image_size =
| location_map = USA Pennsylvania
| image_caption = Photo of Units 2 and 3 {{circa|1974}}
| country = United States
| image_alt =
| location = ], ]
| coordinates = {{coord|39|45|30|N|76|16|5|W|region:US-PA_type:landmark|display=inline,title}}
| lat_d = 39
| country = United States
| lat_m = 45
| location = ], ]
| lat_s = 30
| lat_NS = N | status = O
| construction_began = Unit 1: February 1, 1962<br/>Units 2–3: January 31, 1968
| long_d = 76
| commissioned = Unit 1: June 1, 1967<br/>Unit 2: July 5, 1974<br/>Unit 3: December 23, 1974
| long_m = 16
| decommissioned = Unit 1: November 1, 1974
| long_s = 5
| cost = $2.943 billion (2007 USD)<ref>{{cite web|title=EIA - State Nuclear Profiles|url=https://www.eia.gov/nuclear/state/archive/2010/pennsylvania/ |website=www.eia.gov|access-date=3 October 2017|language=en}}</ref>
| long_EW = W
| owner = Unit 1: ]<br/>Units 2–3: ] (50%),<br/>] (50%)
| coordinates_type = region:US-PA_type:landmark
| operator = ]
| coordinates_display = title
<!------------------------- NUCLEAR POWER STATIONS -->| np_reactor_type = Unit 1: ]<br/>Units 2–3: ]
| owner = ] (50%), <br/> ] (50%)
| np_reactor_supplier = Unit 1: ]<br/>Units 2–3: ]
| operator = Exelon
| construction_began = | np_fuel_type =
| np_fuel_supplier =
| commissioned = Unit 1: 1966 <br/> Unit 2: July 5, 1974 <br/> Unit 3: Dec. 23, 1974
| ps_cogeneration =
| decommissioned = Unit 1: 1974
| ps_cooling_source = ]
| np_reactor_supplier = ] (Units 2 & 3)
| ps_cooling_towers = 3 × ]<br/>(supplemental only)
| np_reactor_type = ] ] (Units 2 & 3)
| ps_units_operational = 2 x 1112 MW <!------------------------- GENERAL -->| ps_units_operational = 1 × 1308 MW<br/>1 × 1309 MW
| ps_units_manu_model = Unit 1: Prototype<br/>Units 2–3: ] (Mark 1)
| ps_units_decommissioned = 1 reactor
| ps_units_uc = | ps_units_uc =
| ps_units_planned = | ps_units_planned =
| ps_units_cancelled =
| ps_electrical_capacity = <!--(MW)-->
| ps_units_decommissioned = 1 × 40 MW
| ps_annual_generation = 18,899 GWh
| ps_thermal_capacity = 1 × 115 MW<sub>th</sub> (decommissioned)<br/>2 × 3951 MW<sub>th</sub>
| status = O
| cost = | ps_heating_capacity =
| ps_electrical_capacity = 2617
| website =
| ps_electrical_cap_fac = 94.81% (2017)<br/>76.90% (lifetime)
| ps_storage_capacity =
| ps_annual_generation = 22,268 GWh (2021)
| website =
| extra =
}} }}


'''Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station''', a ], is located {{convert|50|mi}} southeast of ] in ], ], on the ] three miles north of the ] border. The '''Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station''' is an American ] that is located {{convert|50|mi}} southeast of ] in ], ]. Situated close to the ], it is three miles north of the ] border.


==History==
The ] (later shortened first to PECO Energy and later to just PECO) became one of the pioneers in the commercial nuclear industry when it ordered Peach Bottom&nbsp;1 in 1958. The U.S.'s first nuclear power plant (the ]) had gone on line a year earlier. Peach Bottom Unit&nbsp;1 was an experimental ]-cooled, ]-moderated reactor. It operated from 1966 to 1974. The other two units, ] ]s, placed on-line in 1974, are still in operation on the 620-acre (2.5&nbsp;km<sup>2</sup>) site. Both Units&nbsp;2 and 3 are rated at 3,514&nbsp;]s thermal (MWth), equivalent to about 1,180&nbsp;megawatts of electricity (MWe) each. Their licenses run until 2033 (Unit&nbsp;2) and 2034 (Unit&nbsp;3).
The ] (later "PECO") was a pioneer in the commercial nuclear industry when it ordered Peach Bottom&nbsp;1 in 1958. The U.S.'s first nuclear power plant (the ]) had gone on line a year earlier. Peach Bottom Unit&nbsp;1 was an experimental ]-cooled, ]-moderated reactor. It operated from 1966 to 1974. Peach Bottom 2 and 3, ] ]s, went on-line in 1974, and are still in operation on the 620-acre (2.5&nbsp;km<sup>2</sup>) site today. Both Units&nbsp;2 and 3, originally rated at 3,514&nbsp;]s thermal (MW<sub>th</sub>), equivalent to about 1,180&nbsp;megawatts of electricity (MW<sub>e</sub>) each, were uprated to 4,016&nbsp;megawatts thermal (MW<sub>th</sub>), equivalent to about 1,382&nbsp;megawatts net of electricity (MW<sub>e</sub>) each in 2018. Units 2 and 3 were originally licensed to operate until 2013 and 2014, respectively. Their licenses were extended until 2033 and 2034 and then, in 2020 they were extended to 2053 and 2054.<ref>{{cite web |title=Exelon's Peach Bottom becomes second US nuclear plant to get license approval to 80 years |url=https://www.utilitydive.com/news/exelons-peach-bottom-becomes-second-us-nuclear-plant-to-get-license-approv/573690/ |website=Utility Dive}}</ref>


Peach Bottom is operated by the ] and is jointly owned by Exelon (50%) and ] (PSEG) Power LLC (50%). Peach Bottom is currently operated by ] (formerly a division of PECO's parent company, ], and before that it was known as Baltimore Gas and Electric (BG&E), the oldest gas utility in the country) and is jointly owned by Constellation (50%) and ] (PSEG) Power LLC (formerly Public Service Electric and Gas) (50%).


Peach Bottom was one of the plants analyzed in the ] safety analysis study. Peach Bottom was one of the plants analyzed in the ] safety analysis study.

== Electricity Production ==
{| class="wikitable"
|+'''Generation (''']''') of Peach Bottom Nuclear Generating Station'''<ref>{{Cite web |title=Electricity Data Browser |url=https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/#/plant/3166/?freq=M&pin= |access-date=2023-01-07 |website=www.eia.gov}}</ref>
!Year
!Jan
!Feb
!Mar
!Apr
!May
!Jun
!Jul
!Aug
!Sep
!Oct
!Nov
!Dec
!Annual (Total)
|-
!2001
|<small>1,664,626</small>
|<small>1,472,202</small>
|<small>1,670,642</small>
|<small>1,614,240</small>
|<small>1,634,425</small>
|<small>1,556,160</small>
|<small>1,437,853</small>
|<small>1,373,333</small>
|<small>1,032,388</small>
|<small>1,197,096</small>
|<small>1,594,095</small>
|<small>1,646,619</small>
!17,893,679
|-
!2002
|<small>1,611,096</small>
|<small>1,502,169</small>
|<small>1,631,352</small>
|<small>1,608,685</small>
|<small>1,650,900</small>
|<small>1,591,210</small>
|<small>1,618,222</small>
|<small>1,550,246</small>
|<small>992,940</small>
|<small>1,567,018</small>
|<small>1,623,340</small>
|<small>1,539,148</small>
!18,486,326
|-
!2003
|<small>1,678,488</small>
|<small>1,467,100</small>
|<small>1,690,062</small>
|<small>1,568,558</small>
|<small>1,548,152</small>
|<small>1,620,856</small>
|<small>1,510,658</small>
|<small>1,632,360</small>
|<small>863,614</small>
|<small>1,316,151</small>
|<small>1,644,917</small>
|<small>1,643,804</small>
!18,184,720
|-
!2004
|<small>1,698,569</small>
|<small>1,475,988</small>
|<small>1,695,892</small>
|<small>1,629,694</small>
|<small>1,670,367</small>
|<small>1,617,596</small>
|<small>1,659,213</small>
|<small>1,612,699</small>
|<small>1,154,476</small>
|<small>1,396,575</small>
|<small>1,644,485</small>
|<small>1,563,827</small>
!18,819,381
|-
!2005
|<small>1,674,690</small>
|<small>1,398,795</small>
|<small>1,645,670</small>
|<small>1,632,476</small>
|<small>1,648,942</small>
|<small>1,598,503</small>
|<small>1,554,916</small>
|<small>1,596,322</small>
|<small>1,101,005</small>
|<small>1,203,077</small>
|<small>1,640,015</small>
|<small>1,699,039</small>
!18,393,450
|-
!2006
|<small>1,665,319</small>
|<small>1,534,525</small>
|<small>1,697,491</small>
|<small>1,635,262</small>
|<small>1,646,452</small>
|<small>1,615,009</small>
|<small>1,642,621</small>
|<small>1,611,988</small>
|<small>1,152,794</small>
|<small>1,394,900</small>
|<small>1,640,511</small>
|<small>1,695,805</small>
!18,932,677
|-
!2007
|<small>1,689,888</small>
|<small>1,511,891</small>
|<small>1,688,236</small>
|<small>1,624,237</small>
|<small>1,673,642</small>
|<small>1,611,518</small>
|<small>1,651,388</small>
|<small>1,607,209</small>
|<small>1,271,760</small>
|<small>1,224,953</small>
|<small>1,645,705</small>
|<small>1,698,295</small>
!18,898,722
|-
!2008
|<small>1,687,531</small>
|<small>1,473,574</small>
|<small>1,696,857</small>
|<small>1,636,080</small>
|<small>1,667,933</small>
|<small>1,612,531</small>
|<small>1,631,312</small>
|<small>1,567,732</small>
|<small>1,096,725</small>
|<small>1,116,824</small>
|<small>1,647,421</small>
|<small>1,700,263</small>
!18,534,783
|-
!2009
|<small>1,475,861</small>
|<small>1,521,316</small>
|<small>1,659,915</small>
|<small>1,626,902</small>
|<small>1,669,790</small>
|<small>1,618,891</small>
|<small>1,660,211</small>
|<small>1,610,510</small>
|<small>1,095,254</small>
|<small>1,321,688</small>
|<small>1,652,511</small>
|<small>1,696,980</small>
!18,609,829
|-
!2010
|<small>1,669,745</small>
|<small>1,510,824</small>
|<small>1,693,816</small>
|<small>1,643,884</small>
|<small>1,658,594</small>
|<small>1,621,294</small>
|<small>1,650,172</small>
|<small>1,599,740</small>
|<small>1,076,368</small>
|<small>1,444,535</small>
|<small>1,486,439</small>
|<small>1,703,970</small>
!18,759,381
|-
!2011
|<small>1,688,092</small>
|<small>1,538,951</small>
|<small>1,699,432</small>
|<small>1,634,743</small>
|<small>1,675,131</small>
|<small>1,620,931</small>
|<small>1,643,404</small>
|<small>1,581,960</small>
|<small>1,055,235</small>
|<small>1,273,617</small>
|<small>1,678,069</small>
|<small>1,735,372</small>
!18,824,937
|-
!2012
|<small>1,716,202</small>
|<small>1,623,887</small>
|<small>1,727,163</small>
|<small>1,667,514</small>
|<small>1,671,647</small>
|<small>1,613,516</small>
|<small>1,615,369</small>
|<small>1,526,380</small>
|<small>996,335</small>
|<small>1,176,966</small>
|<small>1,706,994</small>
|<small>1,764,049</small>
!18,806,022
|-
!2013
|<small>1,753,160</small>
|<small>1,586,736</small>
|<small>1,757,394</small>
|<small>1,719,406</small>
|<small>1,711,012</small>
|<small>1,627,018</small>
|<small>1,639,108</small>
|<small>1,570,377</small>
|<small>971,377</small>
|<small>1,028,179</small>
|<small>1,702,881</small>
|<small>1,767,884</small>
!18,834,532
|-
!2014
|<small>1,764,732</small>
|<small>1,535,556</small>
|<small>1,745,261</small>
|<small>1,701,002</small>
|<small>1,710,822</small>
|<small>1,637,638</small>
|<small>1,662,359</small>
|<small>1,669,483</small>
|<small>1,570,931</small>
|<small>1,300,486</small>
|<small>845,627</small>
|<small>1,627,272</small>
!18,771,169
|-
!2015
|<small>1,738,500</small>
|<small>1,521,627</small>
|<small>1,726,289</small>
|<small>1,740,198</small>
|<small>1,777,697</small>
|<small>1,705,492</small>
|<small>1,752,571</small>
|<small>1,683,650</small>
|<small>1,352,070</small>
|<small>1,204,949</small>
|<small>1,811,530</small>
|<small>1,843,729</small>
!19,858,302
|-
!2016
|<small>1,973,770</small>
|<small>1,840,909</small>
|<small>1,961,836</small>
|<small>1,874,377</small>
|<small>1,913,055</small>
|<small>1,786,221</small>
|<small>1,849,729</small>
|<small>1,815,094</small>
|<small>1,759,409</small>
|<small>1,577,149</small>
|<small>1,546,878</small>
|<small>1,977,008</small>
!21,875,435
|-
!2017
|<small>1,937,962</small>
|<small>1,773,025</small>
|<small>1,972,031</small>
|<small>1,892,130</small>
|<small>1,798,344</small>
|<small>1,841,185</small>
|<small>1,870,889</small>
|<small>1,841,939</small>
|<small>1,705,062</small>
|<small>1,474,115</small>
|<small>1,663,753</small>
|<small>1,952,108</small>
!21,722,543
|-
!2018
|<small>1,993,215</small>
|<small>1,775,644</small>
|<small>1,959,427</small>
|<small>1,895,427</small>
|<small>1,975,987</small>
|<small>1,813,495</small>
|<small>1,869,074</small>
|<small>1,897,741</small>
|<small>1,585,072</small>
|<small>974,012</small>
|<small>1,938,325</small>
|<small>2,002,697</small>
!21,680,116
|-
!2019
|<small>2,002,859</small>
|<small>1,809,685</small>
|<small>2,001,340</small>
|<small>1,927,258</small>
|<small>1,974,532</small>
|<small>1,870,469</small>
|<small>1,886,773</small>
|<small>1,863,973</small>
|<small>1,754,960</small>
|<small>1,479,158</small>
|<small>1,729,059</small>
|<small>1,994,319</small>
!22,294,385
|-
!2020
|<small>2,004,994</small>
|<small>1,876,623</small>
|<small>1,984,657</small>
|<small>1,934,403</small>
|<small>1,967,831</small>
|<small>1,855,918</small>
|<small>1,871,962</small>
|<small>1,826,635</small>
|<small>1,700,914</small>
|<small>1,394,277</small>
|<small>1,416,054</small>
|<small>1,958,066</small>
!21,792,334
|-
!2021
|<small>2,002,793</small>
|<small>1,786,510</small>
|<small>1,998,255</small>
|<small>1,922,903</small>
|<small>1,921,720</small>
|<small>1,860,860</small>
|<small>1,895,146</small>
|<small>1,873,639</small>
|<small>1,771,548</small>
|<small>1,573,523</small>
|<small>1,657,609</small>
|<small>2,003,738</small>
!22,268,244
|-
!2022
|<small>2,000,038</small>
|<small>1,806,696</small>
|<small>1,980,295</small>
|<small>1,930,149</small>
|<small>1,850,321</small>
|<small>1,859,721</small>
|<small>1,861,234</small>
|<small>1,825,082</small>
|<small>1,755,487</small>
|<small>1,406,088</small>
|<small>1,913,010</small>
|<small>1,995,682</small>
!22,183,803
|-
!2023
|<small>1,982,664</small>
|<small>1,800,032</small>
|<small>1,989,076</small>
|<small>1,907,233</small>
|<small>1,951,871</small>
|<small>1,850,361</small>
|<small>1,870,105</small>
|<small>1,839,176</small>
|<small>1,702,405</small>
|<small>1,347,329</small>
|<small>1,927,943</small>
|<small>1,995,878</small>
!22,164,093
|-
!2024
|<small>1,902,289</small>
|<small>1,859,725</small>
|<small>1,965,241</small>
|<small>1,908,087</small>
|<small>1,910,618</small>
|<small>1,833,236</small>
|<small>1,614,906</small>
|<small>1,878,974</small>
|<small>1,767,490</small>
|<small></small>
|<small></small>
|<small></small>
!--
|}


==Surrounding population== ==Surrounding population==
] ]
The ] defines two emergency planning zones around nuclear power plants: a plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of {{convert|10|mi}}, concerned primarily with exposure to, and inhalation of, airborne radioactive contamination, and an ingestion pathway zone of about {{convert|50|mi}}, concerned primarily with ingestion of food and liquid contaminated by radioactivity.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/emerg-plan-prep-nuc-power-bg.html|title=NRC: Backgrounder on Emergency Preparedness at Nuclear Power Plants|publisher=|accessdate=10 October 2014}}</ref> The ] defines two emergency planning zones around nuclear power plants: a plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of {{convert|10|mi}}, concerned primarily with exposure to, and inhalation of, airborne radioactive contamination, and an ingestion pathway zone of about {{convert|50|mi}}, concerned primarily with ingestion of food and liquid contaminated by radioactivity.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/emerg-plan-prep-nuc-power-bg.html |title=NRC: Backgrounder on Emergency Preparedness at Nuclear Power Plants |access-date=10 October 2014 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061002131207/http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/emerg-plan-prep-nuc-power-bg.html |archive-date=October 2, 2006 }}</ref>


The 2010 U.S. population within {{convert|10|mi}} of Peach Bottom was 46,536, an increase of 7.2 percent in a decade, according to an analysis of U.S. Census data for msnbc.com. The 2010 U.S. population within {{convert|50|mi}} was 5,526,343, an increase of 10.6 percent since 2000. Cities within 50 miles include Baltimore (36 miles to city center).<ref>], Nuclear neighbors: Population rises near US reactors, '']'', April 14, 2011 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42555888/ns/us_news-life/ Accessed May 1, 2011.</ref> The 2010 U.S. population within {{convert|10|mi}} of Peach Bottom was 46,536, an increase of 7.2 percent in a decade, according to an analysis of U.S. Census data for msnbc.com. The 2010 U.S. population within {{convert|50|mi}} was 5,526,343, an increase of 10.6 percent since 2000. Cities within 50 miles include Baltimore (36 miles to city center).<ref>{{Cite web |date=2011-04-14 |title=Nuclear neighbors: Population rises near US reactors |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna42555888 |access-date=2024-08-16 |website=NBC News |language=en}}</ref>

Cities within 50 miles:
* Pennsylvania
** ] (Capital) (48mi/78km)
* Maryland
** ] (37mi/60km)
* Delaware
** ] (38mi/61km)


==Safety concerns== ==Safety concerns==
{{mcn section|date=October 2024}}
In 1987, PECO was ordered by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to indefinitely shutdown Peach Bottom-2 and -3 on March 31 due to operator
misconduct, corporate malfeasance and blatant disregard for the health and
safety of the area. Infamously, operators were found sleeping on the job, playing video games, engaging in rubber band and paper ball fights, and reading unauthorized material.


In 1987, PECO was ordered by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to indefinitely shutdown Peach Bottom-2 and -3 on March 31 due to operator misconduct, corporate malfeasance, and blatant disregard for the health and safety of the area. {{citation needed|date=August 2021}}.
Among the incidents cited by the NRC: security guards were overworked,
and one guard was found asleep on the job; 36,000 gallons of "mildly
radioactive water" leaked into the Susquehanna River; PECO mislaid
data on radioactive waste classification causing misclassification of a waste
shipment; at the turbine building on March 4, 1987, Unit 3 a major fire
occurred at the maintenance cage.


Among the incidents cited by the NRC: security guards were overworked, one guard was found asleep on the job, 36,000 gallons of "mildly radioactive water" leaked into the Susquehanna River, PECO mislaid data on radioactive waste classification causing misclassification of a waste shipment, and a major fire occurred in the maintenance cage of the Unit 3 turbine building on March 4, 1987{{citation needed|date=August 2021}}.
Blame was not simply placed on the operators. “Latent organizational weakness” was targeted by industry experts and regulators alike. INPO President Zack Pate came to the conclusion that “Major changes in the corporate culture at PECO are required.” In September 1988 NRC Chairman Lando Zech told senior management officials of PECO, "Your operators certainly made mistakes, no question about that. Your corporate management problems are just as serious." Clearly a culture characterized by low morale and apathy prevailed. By April 1988 this emphasis on mismanagement contributed to the President of PECO resigning as well as to the retirement of the CEO.


Blame was not simply placed on the operators. "Latent organizational weakness" was targeted by industry experts and regulators alike. INPO President Zack Pate came to the conclusion that "Major changes in the corporate culture at PECO are required." In September 1988, NRC Chairman Lando Zech told senior management officials of PECO, "Your operators certainly made mistakes, no question about that. Your corporate management problems are just as serious." Clearly, a culture characterized by low morale and apathy prevailed. By April 1988, this emphasis on mismanagement contributed to the President of PECO resigning as well as to the retirement of the CEO.{{citation needed|date=June 2016}}
Robert P. Crosby became the primary Organization Development influence during the PECO Nuclear turnaround following the Peach Bottom shut down. He used ] model by John L. Wallen along with a unique ] method known as Conflict Management (and later as ''Tough Stuff'' in other business applications) to speed culture change, and applied his own version of Daryl Conner's Sponsor Agent Target model to improving and shortening outage management.<ref>Crosby, G. (2015). Fight, Flight, Freeze: Taming Your Reptilian Brain and other Practical Approaches to Self-Improvement. Second Edition. Seattle, WA: CrosbyOD Publishing. Chapters 3 and 4 are dedicated to ] and Wallen’s behavioral skills, Chapter 11 to the PECO Nuclear turnaround.</ref><ref>Crosby, R.P. (2011). Culture Change in Organizations: A Guide to Leadership and Bottom-Line Results. Second Edition. Seattle, WA: CrosbyOD Publishing. Appendix F, ''Culture Can be Built: PECO Nuclear Turnaround''.</ref>


Robert P. Crosby became the primary Organization Development influence during the PECO Nuclear turnaround following the Peach Bottom shut down. He used ] model by John L. Wallen along with a unique ] method known as Conflict Management (and later as ''Tough Stuff'' in other business applications) to speed culture change, and applied his own version of Daryl Conner's Sponsor Agent Target model to improving and shortening outage management.<ref>Crosby, G. (2015). ''Fight, Flight, Freeze: Taming Your Reptilian Brain and other Practical Approaches to Self-Improvement''. Second Edition. Seattle, WA: CrosbyOD Publishing. Chapters 3 and 4 are dedicated to ] and Wallen’s behavioral skills, Chapter 11 to the PECO Nuclear turnaround.</ref><ref>Crosby, R.P. (2011). ''Culture Change in Organizations: A Guide to Leadership and Bottom-Line Results''. Second Edition. Seattle, WA: CrosbyOD Publishing. Appendix F, ''Culture Can be Built: PECO Nuclear Turnaround''.</ref>
By 1996 both Limerick and Peach Bottom were designated excellent by INPO, and given strong Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) ratings by the NRC.


By 1996, both Limerick and Peach Bottom were designated excellent by INPO, and given strong Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) ratings by the NRC.
In 1999 PECO Nuclear eliminated their Organization Development positions as part of cost cutting initiative.

In 1999, PECO Nuclear eliminated their Organization Development positions as part of cost cutting initiative.
Trouble arose again in September 2007, when former employee Kerry Beal videotaped Peach Bottom security guards sleeping on the job. Beal had previously tried to notify supervisors at ] and the US ].<ref>{{cite news In 2007, Kerry Beal videotaped Peach Bottom security guards sleeping on the job. Beal had previously tried to notify supervisors at ] and the US ].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/03/AR2008010304442.html?sub=AR |title=Video of Sleeping Guards Shakes Nuclear Industry |last=Mufson |first=Steven |date=January 4, 2008 |newspaper=] |access-date=2008-11-18}}</ref>
| url= http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/03/AR2008010304442.html?sub=AR
| title= Video of Sleeping Guards Shakes Nuclear Industry
| last= Mufson | first= Steven
|date= January 4, 2008 |work= ] |publisher=
| accessdate= 2008-11-18 }}</ref> He was eventually fired during the Exelon security transition, a decision which made a list of the 101 "dumbest moments in business" in the Jan 16, 2008 issue of '']''.<ref>{{cite news
| url= http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/fortune/0712/gallery.101_dumbest.fortune/69.html
| title= 101 Dumbest Moments in Business: 69. Exelon Nuclear
| date= January 16, 2008 |work= |publisher= ]
| accessdate= 2009-06-12 }}</ref>


==Seismic risk== ==Seismic risk==
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's estimate of the risk each year of an earthquake intense enough to cause core damage to the reactor at Peach Bottom was 1 in 41,667; according to an NRC study published in August 2010.<ref>], "What are the odds? US nuke plants ranked by quake risk," '']'', March 17, 2011 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42103936/ Accessed April 19, 2011.</ref><ref>http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/Sections/NEWS/quake%20nrc%20risk%20estimates.pdf</ref> The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's estimate of the risk each year of an earthquake intense enough to cause core damage to the reactor at Peach Bottom was 1 in 41,667; according to an NRC study published in August 2010.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2011-03-16 |title=What are the odds? US nuke plants ranked by quake risk |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna42103936 |access-date=2024-08-16 |website=NBC News |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/Sections/NEWS/quake%20nrc%20risk%20estimates.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=2011-04-19 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170525170632/http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/Sections/NEWS/quake%20nrc%20risk%20estimates.pdf |archive-date=2017-05-25 |url-status=dead }}</ref>


==See also== ==See also==
{{stack|{{Portal|Pennsylvania|Energy|Nuclear technology}}}}
* ]
*] * ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] (formerly The Wackenhut Corporation)
* ]
* ]


==References== ==References==
;Specific
{{reflist}}<li id="cite_note-7">http://www.nrc.gov/info-finder/decommissioning/power-reactor/peach-bottom-atomic-power-station-unit.html
{{reflist}}

;General
<li id="cite_note-7">https://www.nrc.gov/info-finder/decommissioning/power-reactor/peach-bottom-atomic-power-station-unit.html
</li> </li>


Line 96: Line 482:
| url= http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/nuclear/page/at_a_glance/reactors/peach_bottom.html | url= http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/nuclear/page/at_a_glance/reactors/peach_bottom.html
| title= Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Pennsylvania | title= Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Pennsylvania
| date= October 3, 2008 |work= | publisher= ], ] (DOE) | date= October 3, 2008 | publisher= ], ] (DOE)
| accessdate= 2008-11-18 }} | access-date= 2008-11-18 }}
*{{cite web *{{cite web
| url= http://www.nrc.gov/info-finder/reactor/pb2.html | url= https://www.nrc.gov/info-finder/reactor/pb2.html
| title= Peach Bottom 2 Boiling Water Reactor | title= Peach Bottom 2 Boiling Water Reactor
| date= February 14, 2008 | work= Operating Nuclear Power Reactors | date= February 14, 2008 | work= Operating Nuclear Power Reactors
| publisher= U.S. ] (NRC) | publisher= U.S. ] (NRC)
| accessdate= 2008-11-18 }} | access-date= 2008-11-18 }}
*{{cite web *{{cite web
| url= http://www.nrc.gov/info-finder/reactor/pb3.html | url= https://www.nrc.gov/info-finder/reactor/pb3.html
| title= Peach Bottom 3 Boiling Water Reactor | title= Peach Bottom 3 Boiling Water Reactor
| date= February 14, 2008 | work= Operating Nuclear Power Reactors | date= February 14, 2008 | work= Operating Nuclear Power Reactors
| publisher= NRC | publisher= NRC
| accessdate= 2008-11-18 }} | access-date= 2008-11-18 }}


* {{cite web * {{cite web
| url= http://www.pseg.com/companies/nuclear/peachbottom.jsp | url= http://www.pseg.com/companies/nuclear/peachbottom.jsp
| title= The Peach Bottom Atomic Energy Station | title= The Peach Bottom Atomic Energy Station
| year= 2008 |work= | publisher= ] LLC | year= 2008 | publisher= ] LLC
| accessdate= 2008-11-18 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20080607061300/http://www.pseg.com/companies/nuclear/peachbottom.jsp <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archivedate = 2008-06-07}} | access-date= 2008-11-18 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080607061300/http://www.pseg.com/companies/nuclear/peachbottom.jsp <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archive-date = 2008-06-07}}


{{U.S. Nuclear Plants}} {{U.S. Nuclear Plants}}
Line 121: Line 507:
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]

Latest revision as of 17:41, 19 December 2024

Nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania
Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station
Photo of Units 2 and 3 c. 1974
CountryUnited States
LocationDelta, York County, Pennsylvania, York County, Pennsylvania
Coordinates39°45′30″N 76°16′5″W / 39.75833°N 76.26806°W / 39.75833; -76.26806
StatusOperational
Construction beganUnit 1: February 1, 1962
Units 2–3: January 31, 1968
Commission dateUnit 1: June 1, 1967
Unit 2: July 5, 1974
Unit 3: December 23, 1974
Decommission dateUnit 1: November 1, 1974
Construction cost$2.943 billion (2007 USD)
OwnersUnit 1: Constellation Energy
Units 2–3: Constellation Energy (50%),
PSEG (50%)
OperatorConstellation Energy
Nuclear power station
Reactor typeUnit 1: HTGR
Units 2–3: BWR
Reactor supplierUnit 1: General Atomics
Units 2–3: General Electric
Cooling towers3 × Mechanical Draft
(supplemental only)
Cooling sourceSusquehanna River
Thermal capacity1 × 115 MWth (decommissioned)
2 × 3951 MWth
Power generation
Units operational1 × 1308 MW
1 × 1309 MW
Make and modelUnit 1: Prototype
Units 2–3: BWR-4 (Mark 1)
Units decommissioned1 × 40 MW
Nameplate capacity2617 MW
Capacity factor94.81% (2017)
76.90% (lifetime)
Annual net output22,268 GWh (2021)
External links
WebsitePeach Bottom Atomic Power Station
CommonsRelated media on Commons
[edit on Wikidata]

The Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station is an American nuclear power plant that is located 50 miles (80 km) southeast of Harrisburg in Peach Bottom Township, York County, Pennsylvania. Situated close to the Susquehanna River, it is three miles north of the Maryland border.

History

The Philadelphia Electric Company (later "PECO") was a pioneer in the commercial nuclear industry when it ordered Peach Bottom 1 in 1958. The U.S.'s first nuclear power plant (the Shippingport Reactor) had gone on line a year earlier. Peach Bottom Unit 1 was an experimental helium-cooled, graphite-moderated reactor. It operated from 1966 to 1974. Peach Bottom 2 and 3, General Electric boiling water reactors, went on-line in 1974, and are still in operation on the 620-acre (2.5 km) site today. Both Units 2 and 3, originally rated at 3,514 megawatts thermal (MWth), equivalent to about 1,180 megawatts of electricity (MWe) each, were uprated to 4,016 megawatts thermal (MWth), equivalent to about 1,382 megawatts net of electricity (MWe) each in 2018. Units 2 and 3 were originally licensed to operate until 2013 and 2014, respectively. Their licenses were extended until 2033 and 2034 and then, in 2020 they were extended to 2053 and 2054.

Peach Bottom is currently operated by Constellation Energy (formerly a division of PECO's parent company, Exelon, and before that it was known as Baltimore Gas and Electric (BG&E), the oldest gas utility in the country) and is jointly owned by Constellation (50%) and Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG) Power LLC (formerly Public Service Electric and Gas) (50%).

Peach Bottom was one of the plants analyzed in the NUREG-1150 safety analysis study.

Electricity Production

Generation (MWh) of Peach Bottom Nuclear Generating Station
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual (Total)
2001 1,664,626 1,472,202 1,670,642 1,614,240 1,634,425 1,556,160 1,437,853 1,373,333 1,032,388 1,197,096 1,594,095 1,646,619 17,893,679
2002 1,611,096 1,502,169 1,631,352 1,608,685 1,650,900 1,591,210 1,618,222 1,550,246 992,940 1,567,018 1,623,340 1,539,148 18,486,326
2003 1,678,488 1,467,100 1,690,062 1,568,558 1,548,152 1,620,856 1,510,658 1,632,360 863,614 1,316,151 1,644,917 1,643,804 18,184,720
2004 1,698,569 1,475,988 1,695,892 1,629,694 1,670,367 1,617,596 1,659,213 1,612,699 1,154,476 1,396,575 1,644,485 1,563,827 18,819,381
2005 1,674,690 1,398,795 1,645,670 1,632,476 1,648,942 1,598,503 1,554,916 1,596,322 1,101,005 1,203,077 1,640,015 1,699,039 18,393,450
2006 1,665,319 1,534,525 1,697,491 1,635,262 1,646,452 1,615,009 1,642,621 1,611,988 1,152,794 1,394,900 1,640,511 1,695,805 18,932,677
2007 1,689,888 1,511,891 1,688,236 1,624,237 1,673,642 1,611,518 1,651,388 1,607,209 1,271,760 1,224,953 1,645,705 1,698,295 18,898,722
2008 1,687,531 1,473,574 1,696,857 1,636,080 1,667,933 1,612,531 1,631,312 1,567,732 1,096,725 1,116,824 1,647,421 1,700,263 18,534,783
2009 1,475,861 1,521,316 1,659,915 1,626,902 1,669,790 1,618,891 1,660,211 1,610,510 1,095,254 1,321,688 1,652,511 1,696,980 18,609,829
2010 1,669,745 1,510,824 1,693,816 1,643,884 1,658,594 1,621,294 1,650,172 1,599,740 1,076,368 1,444,535 1,486,439 1,703,970 18,759,381
2011 1,688,092 1,538,951 1,699,432 1,634,743 1,675,131 1,620,931 1,643,404 1,581,960 1,055,235 1,273,617 1,678,069 1,735,372 18,824,937
2012 1,716,202 1,623,887 1,727,163 1,667,514 1,671,647 1,613,516 1,615,369 1,526,380 996,335 1,176,966 1,706,994 1,764,049 18,806,022
2013 1,753,160 1,586,736 1,757,394 1,719,406 1,711,012 1,627,018 1,639,108 1,570,377 971,377 1,028,179 1,702,881 1,767,884 18,834,532
2014 1,764,732 1,535,556 1,745,261 1,701,002 1,710,822 1,637,638 1,662,359 1,669,483 1,570,931 1,300,486 845,627 1,627,272 18,771,169
2015 1,738,500 1,521,627 1,726,289 1,740,198 1,777,697 1,705,492 1,752,571 1,683,650 1,352,070 1,204,949 1,811,530 1,843,729 19,858,302
2016 1,973,770 1,840,909 1,961,836 1,874,377 1,913,055 1,786,221 1,849,729 1,815,094 1,759,409 1,577,149 1,546,878 1,977,008 21,875,435
2017 1,937,962 1,773,025 1,972,031 1,892,130 1,798,344 1,841,185 1,870,889 1,841,939 1,705,062 1,474,115 1,663,753 1,952,108 21,722,543
2018 1,993,215 1,775,644 1,959,427 1,895,427 1,975,987 1,813,495 1,869,074 1,897,741 1,585,072 974,012 1,938,325 2,002,697 21,680,116
2019 2,002,859 1,809,685 2,001,340 1,927,258 1,974,532 1,870,469 1,886,773 1,863,973 1,754,960 1,479,158 1,729,059 1,994,319 22,294,385
2020 2,004,994 1,876,623 1,984,657 1,934,403 1,967,831 1,855,918 1,871,962 1,826,635 1,700,914 1,394,277 1,416,054 1,958,066 21,792,334
2021 2,002,793 1,786,510 1,998,255 1,922,903 1,921,720 1,860,860 1,895,146 1,873,639 1,771,548 1,573,523 1,657,609 2,003,738 22,268,244
2022 2,000,038 1,806,696 1,980,295 1,930,149 1,850,321 1,859,721 1,861,234 1,825,082 1,755,487 1,406,088 1,913,010 1,995,682 22,183,803
2023 1,982,664 1,800,032 1,989,076 1,907,233 1,951,871 1,850,361 1,870,105 1,839,176 1,702,405 1,347,329 1,927,943 1,995,878 22,164,093
2024 1,902,289 1,859,725 1,965,241 1,908,087 1,910,618 1,833,236 1,614,906 1,878,974 1,767,490 --

Surrounding population

Photo of Peach Bottom Unit 1

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission defines two emergency planning zones around nuclear power plants: a plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of 10 miles (16 km), concerned primarily with exposure to, and inhalation of, airborne radioactive contamination, and an ingestion pathway zone of about 50 miles (80 km), concerned primarily with ingestion of food and liquid contaminated by radioactivity.

The 2010 U.S. population within 10 miles (16 km) of Peach Bottom was 46,536, an increase of 7.2 percent in a decade, according to an analysis of U.S. Census data for msnbc.com. The 2010 U.S. population within 50 miles (80 km) was 5,526,343, an increase of 10.6 percent since 2000. Cities within 50 miles include Baltimore (36 miles to city center).

Cities within 50 miles:

Safety concerns

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (October 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

In 1987, PECO was ordered by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to indefinitely shutdown Peach Bottom-2 and -3 on March 31 due to operator misconduct, corporate malfeasance, and blatant disregard for the health and safety of the area. .

Among the incidents cited by the NRC: security guards were overworked, one guard was found asleep on the job, 36,000 gallons of "mildly radioactive water" leaked into the Susquehanna River, PECO mislaid data on radioactive waste classification causing misclassification of a waste shipment, and a major fire occurred in the maintenance cage of the Unit 3 turbine building on March 4, 1987.

Blame was not simply placed on the operators. "Latent organizational weakness" was targeted by industry experts and regulators alike. INPO President Zack Pate came to the conclusion that "Major changes in the corporate culture at PECO are required." In September 1988, NRC Chairman Lando Zech told senior management officials of PECO, "Your operators certainly made mistakes, no question about that. Your corporate management problems are just as serious." Clearly, a culture characterized by low morale and apathy prevailed. By April 1988, this emphasis on mismanagement contributed to the President of PECO resigning as well as to the retirement of the CEO.

Robert P. Crosby became the primary Organization Development influence during the PECO Nuclear turnaround following the Peach Bottom shut down. He used The Interpersonal Gap model by John L. Wallen along with a unique T-group method known as Conflict Management (and later as Tough Stuff in other business applications) to speed culture change, and applied his own version of Daryl Conner's Sponsor Agent Target model to improving and shortening outage management.

By 1996, both Limerick and Peach Bottom were designated excellent by INPO, and given strong Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) ratings by the NRC.

In 1999, PECO Nuclear eliminated their Organization Development positions as part of cost cutting initiative.

In 2007, Kerry Beal videotaped Peach Bottom security guards sleeping on the job. Beal had previously tried to notify supervisors at Wackenhut Corp. and the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Seismic risk

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's estimate of the risk each year of an earthquake intense enough to cause core damage to the reactor at Peach Bottom was 1 in 41,667; according to an NRC study published in August 2010.

See also

References

Specific
  1. "EIA - State Nuclear Profiles". www.eia.gov. Retrieved 3 October 2017.
  2. "Exelon's Peach Bottom becomes second US nuclear plant to get license approval to 80 years". Utility Dive.
  3. "Electricity Data Browser". www.eia.gov. Retrieved 2023-01-07.
  4. "NRC: Backgrounder on Emergency Preparedness at Nuclear Power Plants". Archived from the original on October 2, 2006. Retrieved 10 October 2014.
  5. "Nuclear neighbors: Population rises near US reactors". NBC News. 2011-04-14. Retrieved 2024-08-16.
  6. Crosby, G. (2015). Fight, Flight, Freeze: Taming Your Reptilian Brain and other Practical Approaches to Self-Improvement. Second Edition. Seattle, WA: CrosbyOD Publishing. Chapters 3 and 4 are dedicated to The Interpersonal Gap and Wallen’s behavioral skills, Chapter 11 to the PECO Nuclear turnaround.
  7. Crosby, R.P. (2011). Culture Change in Organizations: A Guide to Leadership and Bottom-Line Results. Second Edition. Seattle, WA: CrosbyOD Publishing. Appendix F, Culture Can be Built: PECO Nuclear Turnaround.
  8. Mufson, Steven (January 4, 2008). "Video of Sleeping Guards Shakes Nuclear Industry". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2008-11-18.
  9. "What are the odds? US nuke plants ranked by quake risk". NBC News. 2011-03-16. Retrieved 2024-08-16.
  10. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-05-25. Retrieved 2011-04-19.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
General
  • https://www.nrc.gov/info-finder/decommissioning/power-reactor/peach-bottom-atomic-power-station-unit.html
  • External links

    Nuclear power in the United States
    NRC Region I
    (Northeast)
    NRC Region II
    (South)
    NRC Region III
    (Midwest)
    NRC Region IV
    (West)
    Converted
    Closed
    Cancelled
    (incomplete list,
    whole plants only)
    Future
    Categories: