Misplaced Pages

F for Fake: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:01, 29 March 2016 editUseitorloseit (talk | contribs)471 edits added true plot summary, rearranged existing summary as a section on background of the film since it fit better that way← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:56, 22 December 2024 edit undo72.37.128.114 (talk) Filming locations: adding missing location 
(186 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|1974 film by Orson Welles}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=June 2013}} {{Use dmy dates|date=March 2018}}
{{Infobox film {{Infobox film
| name = F for Fake | name = F for Fake
| image = F for Fake poster.jpg | image = F for Fake (1973 poster).jpg
| alt = Black and white image of Orson Welles, dark hat covering his brow and his dark beard both blending into the dark background
| caption =
| alt = | caption = US theatrical release poster
| director = {{Plainlist| | director = {{Plainlist|
* ] * ]
* ] <small>(uncredited)</small> * ]
* ] <small>(uncredited)</small>
* ] <small>(uncredited)</small>
}} }}
| producer = {{Plainlist| | producer = {{Plainlist|
* François Reichenbach * François Reichenbach
* Dominique Antoine * Dominique Antoine
* Richard Drewitt * Richard Drewett
}} }}
| writer = {{Plainlist| | writer = {{Plainlist|
* Orson Welles * Orson Welles
* Oja Kodar * ]
}} }}
| narrator =
| starring = {{Plainlist| | starring = {{Plainlist|
* Orson Welles * Orson Welles
* Oja Kodar * ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* Edith Irving
* François Reichenbach * ]
* Gary Graver
}} }}
| narrator =
| music = ] | music = ]
| cinematography = {{Plainlist| | cinematography = {{Plainlist|
* François Reichenbach <small>(France)</small> * ] (France)
* Gary Graver <small>(United States)</small> * Gary Graver (United States)
}} }}
| editing = {{Plainlist| | editing = {{Plainlist|
* Marie-Sophie Dubus * ]
* Dominique Engerer * Dominique Engerer
* Gary Graver <small>(uncredited)</small> * Gary Graver <small>(uncredited)</small>
}} }}
| distributor = Specialty Films | distributor = Planfilm<br>Specialty Films
| released = September 25, 1975 | released = {{Film date|1973|||San Sebastián Film Festival}}
| runtime = 88 minutes | runtime = 88 minutes
| country = France&nbsp;/&nbsp;]&nbsp;/&nbsp;] | country = ]<br />]<br />]
| language = English&nbsp;/&nbsp;French&nbsp;/&nbsp;Spanish | language = English
| budget = | budget =
|gross = 182,857 admissions (France)<ref name="france"> at Box Office Story</ref> | gross = 182,857 admissions (France)<ref name="france"> at Box Office Story</ref>
| preceded_by =
| followed_by =
}} }}
'''''F for Fake''''' ({{lang-fr|link=no|Vérités et mensonges}}, "Truths and lies") is the last major film completed by ], who directed, co-wrote, and starred in the film. Initially released in 1974, it focuses on ]'s recounting of his career as a professional ]; de Hory's story serves as the backdrop for a fast-paced, meandering investigation of the natures of ] and ], as well as the basis of the value of art. Loosely a documentary, the film operates in several different genres and has been described as a kind of ]. '''''F for Fake''''' ({{langx|fr|link=no|Vérités et mensonges}}, "Truths and lies"; {{langx|es|link=no|Fraude}},<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.festival-cannes.com/es/75-editions/retrospective/2021/actualites/articles/f-for-fake-orson-welles-tente-de-demeler-le-vrai-du-faux-2|title=Fraude (F for Fake): Orson Welles trata de discernir lo verdadero de lo falso|last=Khaldi|first=Tarik|date=14 July 2021|website=]|access-date=26 December 2022}}</ref> "Fraud") is a 1973 ] film co-written, directed by, and starring ] who worked on the film alongside ], ], and ]. Initially released in 1974, it focuses on ]'s recounting of his career as a professional ]; de Hory's story serves as the backdrop for a meandering investigation of the natures of ] and ], as well as the basis of the value of art. Far from serving as a traditional documentary on de Hory, the film also incorporates Welles's companion ], hoax biographer ] and Orson Welles as himself. ''F for Fake'' is sometimes considered an example of a ].


In addition to the 88-minute film, in 1976, Welles also shot and edited a self-contained nine-minute short film as a "]", almost entirely composed of original material not found in the main film itself.
Far from serving as a traditional documentary on Elmyr de Hory, the film also incorporates Welles's companion ], notorious "hoax-biographer" ], and Orson Welles as himself.

In addition to the 88-minute film, in 1976 Welles also shot and edited a self-contained 9-minute short film as a "trailer", almost entirely composed of original material not found in the main film itself.

== Background ==
Orson Welles was hired to edit a documentary by François Reichenbach about the art forger Elmyr de Hory. The film grew over time to encompass de Hory, as well as de Hory's biographer Clifford Irving, who was revealed to be a forger himself. Welles used these circumstances to produce a meditation on the nature of fakery.

Several storylines are presented in the film, including those of de Hory, Irving, Welles, Howard Hughes and Kodar. About de Hory, we learn that he was a struggling artist who turned to forgery out of desperation, only to see the greater share of the profits from his deceptions go to doubly unscrupulous art dealers. As partial compensation for that injustice, he is maintained in a villa in Ibiza by one of his dealers. What is only hinted at in Welles's documentary is that de Hory had recently served a two-month sentence in a Spanish prison for ] and consorting with criminals. (De Hory would commit ] a few years after the release of Welles' film, on hearing that Spain had agreed to turn him over to the French authorities.)

Irving's original part in ''F for Fake'' was as de Hory's biographer, but his part grew unexpectedly at some point during production. There has not always been agreement among commentators over just how that production unfolded, but the now-accepted story<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thewag.net/film/f_for_fake.html| title=Hanky-Panky Men: Orson Welles' F for Fake| author=Childers, Doug| date=June 21, 2005| accessdate=February 24, 2010}}</ref> is that the director François Reichenbach shot a documentary about de Hory and Irving before giving his footage to Welles, who then shot additional footage with Reichenbach as his cinematographer.

In the time between the shooting of Reichenbach's documentary and the finishing of Welles', it became known that Irving had perpetrated a hoax of his own, namely a ] of ] (the hoax was later fictionalized in '']''). This discovery prompted the shooting of still more footage, which then got woven into ''F for Fake''. Interweaving the narratives even more, there are several pieces of footage in the film showing Welles at a party with De Hory, and, at one point, De Hory even signs a painting with a forgery of Welles' signature. Some of Hughes' career is outlined in the form of a parody of the "News on the March" sequence in '']''. Welles also draws parallels between the De Hory and Irving hoaxes and his own brush with early notoriety by including a recreation of part of his 1938 '']'' radio drama, which had simulated a newscast about a Martian invasion and sparked panic among some listeners.

The story about Kodar, her grandfather, and Picasso and some forger paintings that the grandfather supposedly made is presented at the end of the film before Welles reminds the viewer that he only promised to tell the truth for an hour and that "for the last 17 minutes, I've been lying my head off." In the commentary to the Criterion Collection DVD release of ''F for Fake'', Kodar claims the idea for this segment as her own. She also claims credit for the movie's opening sequence, which consists of shots of a miniskirt-clad Kodar walking down streets while rubbernecking male admirers (unaware that they are being filmed) stop and openly stare. This sequence is described by Kodar as inspired by her feminism; in his narration, Welles claims the footage was originally shot for an unrelated production.


== Plot == == Plot ==
{{Long plot|date=March 2024}}
The film opens with Welles performing magic tricks for some children while Kodar watches nearby. Welles quotes ] to the effect that a magician is just an actor. Welles promises that for the next hour everything in the film will be based on solid fact. Kodar is then shown strolling around a street in a miniskirt while being ogled by the men on the street. Welles reveals the footage is taken from another experiment about girl-watching, where Kodar deliberately drew attention to herself and the men were unaware they were being filmed. Welles says her story will continue later in the film, and then narrates the story of Elymr de Hory, an art forger who sold many fake paintings to museums and collectors all over the world. Elmyr is shown throwing a dinner party at his home in ] and being feted by European society, although he dances around the question of whether he is guilty or not. One of those filmed is ], who had published a biography of Elmyr called ''Fake'', and later in a notorious scandal was revealed to have been the forger of Howard Hughes's diary. Welles discusses the irony of Irving commenting on Elmyr's forgery while having committed a version of it himself. Irving and Elmyr tell about the art dealers who were fooled by the forgeries, and Welles considers the question whether this means art dealers and appraisers are fake also. The film opens with Welles performing magic tricks for some children while Kodar watches nearby. Welles quotes ] to the effect that a magician is just an actor. Welles promises that for the next hour everything in the film will be based on solid fact. Kodar is then shown strolling around a street in a miniskirt while being ogled by the men on the street. Welles reveals the footage is taken from another experiment about girl-watching, where Kodar deliberately drew attention to herself and the men were unaware they were being filmed. Welles says her story will continue later in the film, and then narrates the story of Elmyr de Hory, an art forger who sold many fake paintings to museums and collectors all over the world. De Hory is shown throwing a dinner party at his home in ] and being feted by European society, although he dances around the question of whether he is guilty or not. One of those filmed is ], who had published a biography of de Hory called ''Fake'', and was later revealed to have been the forger of a fake "authorized biography" of ]. Welles discusses the irony of Irving commenting on de Hory's forgery, while having committed a version of it himself (Welles states his belief that Irving must have been in the process of working on the hoax at the time he was filmed for the de Hory project). Irving and de Hory tell about the art dealers who were fooled by the forgeries, and Welles considers the question whether this means art dealers and appraisers are fake also.


Welles presents more of Irving's story of having had secret contact with Hughes, and the odd stories of Hughes's behavior that may or may not have been true. He wonders if believing such stories makes a person credulous or not, and questions the true wisdom of so-called experts, who verified Irving's forgery as authentic. Reichenbach is shown telling how Elmyr provided him with several paintings of questionable authenticity, but the art dealers he gave them to were willfully blind to it. Welles notes that Elmyr doesn't even own the house he lives in; it's provided for him by an art dealer. Welles recounts his own past use of fakery: how he got a job in Ireland by falsely claiming to be a famous New York actor, and how his broadcast of ] made deliberate use of fake news to enhance the story. He also notes the coincidence that his first film '']'' was originally going to be a fictionalized version of Howard Hughes. Welles presents more of Irving's story of having had secret contact with Hughes, and the odd stories of Hughes's behavior that may or may not have been true. He wonders if believing such stories makes a person credulous or not, and questions the true wisdom of so-called experts, who verified Irving's forgery as authentic. Reichenbach is shown telling how de Hory provided him with several paintings of questionable authenticity, but the art dealers he gave them to were willfully blind to it. Welles notes that de Hory does not even own the house he lives in; it is provided for him by an art dealer. Welles recounts his own past use of fakery: how he got a job in ] by falsely claiming to be a famous New York actor, and how his broadcast of '']'' made deliberate use of fake news to enhance the story. He also notes the coincidence that his first film '']'' was originally going to be a fictionalized version of Howard Hughes.<ref>This contradicts published accounts that the film was inspired by the life of ].</ref>


Irving describes how Elmyr was nearly destitute when younger and subsisted in America by making and selling forgeries that were indistinguishable from the real works, while remaining one step ahead of the law through frequent relocations. He finally moved to Ibiza, but was not prosecuted for lack of witnesses to the actual forging, as well as the scandal that might be aroused by revealing the depth of the art market's complicity in the deception. Elmyr insists he never signed any forgery, and Welles wonders whether, given the fact that all art eventually falls away to ruin, a signature truly matters to any art work. Irving describes how de Hory was nearly destitute when younger and subsisted in America by making and selling forgeries that were indistinguishable from the real works, while remaining one step ahead of the law through frequent relocations. He finally moved to Ibiza, but was not prosecuted for lack of witnesses to the actual forging, as well as the scandal that might be aroused by revealing the depth of the art market's complicity in the deception. De Hory insists he never signed any forgery, and Welles wonders whether, given the fact that all art eventually falls away to ruin, a signature truly matters to any art work. He illustrates the point by shots of the ], pointing out that the names of the men who created the magnificent building and the sculptures which adorn it are unknown. They did not sign their work, but it has endured.


Welles finally presents Kodar's story: she holidayed in the same village as Picasso, who noticed her and painted 22 pieces with her as the model. She insisted she be allowed to keep the paintings, but later when Picasso read about an acclaimed exhibit of 22 new pieces of his, he flew there in a rage, only to discover the pieces were all forgeries. Kodar took Picasso to her grandfather, the forger, who defended his work with pride while Picasso angrily demanded the paintings back. This dialogue is presented by Welles and Kodar re-enacting the parts of the grandfather and Picasso respectively. Welles then confesses that he had promised everything in the "next hour" was true, and that hour had already passed. He admits the entire story of Kodar, her grandfather, and Picasso was made up. He apologizes, quotes Picasso's statement that art is a lie that makes us see the truth, and bids the audience good night. Welles finally presents Kodar's story: she holidayed in the same village as ], who noticed her and painted 22 pieces with her as the model. She insisted she be allowed to keep the paintings, but later when Picasso read about an acclaimed exhibit of 22 new pieces of his, he flew there in a rage, only to discover the pieces were all forgeries. Kodar took Picasso to her grandfather, the forger. In a verbal re-enactment by Welles (grandfather) and Kodar (Picasso), the forger defended his work with pride, saying he invented a new Picasso period. The grandfather suggests that the forgeries go un-reported, to allow him an artistic legacy that Picasso already has. Picasso angrily demanded the paintings back, which is impossible because the grandfather had burned them. Welles then confesses that he had promised everything in the "next hour" was true, and that hour had already passed. He admits the entire story of Kodar, her grandfather, and Picasso was made up. He apologizes, quotes Picasso's statement that art is a lie that makes us see the truth, and bids the audience good evening.


== Cast == == Cast ==
]

* ] – Himself * ] – Himself
* ] – The Art Forger
* ] – The Girl * ] – The Girl
* ] – Special Participant * ] – Special Participant
Line 83: Line 70:
* ] – Special Participant * ] – Special Participant
* ] – Special Participant * ] – Special Participant
* Mark Forgy – Assistant to Elmyr de Hory
* ] – Special Participant (as ]) * Alexander Welles – Special Participant (as Sasa Devcic)
* ] – Special Participant * ] – Special Participant
* ] – Special Participant * ] – Special Participant
* ] – Special Participant * Julio Palinkas – Special Participant
* ] – Special Participant * Christian Odasso – Special Participant
* ] – Special Participant * Françoise Widhoff – Special Participant


=== Others === === Others ===
* ] – Special Participant <small>(voice)</small> * ] – Special Participant (voice)
* ] – Special Participant <small>(voice)</small> * ] – Special Participant (voice)
* ] Himself <small>(uncredited)</small> * ] - Himself (uncredited)
* ] – Himself <small>(uncredited)</small> * ] – Himself (uncredited)
* ] – Himself <small>(uncredited)</small> * ] – Himself (uncredited)
* ] – Himself <small>(uncredited)</small> * ] – Himself (uncredited)
* ] – Herself <small>(uncredited)</small> * ] – Herself (uncredited)


== Locations == ==Production==
===Background===
Orson Welles was hired to edit a documentary by François Reichenbach about the art forger Elmyr de Hory. The film grew over time to encompass de Hory, as well as de Hory's biographer Clifford Irving, who was revealed to be a forger himself. Keith Woodward explains: "following Irving’s hoax, Welles and his cinematographer, Gary Graver, shifted gears, scrambling to keep up with the Hughes affair, adding new shots, re-thinking the narrative, re-editing, re-combining different themes, incorporating emerging material."<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Woodward|first=Keith|date=2016|title=The Speculative Geography of Orson Welles|journal=Cultural Geographies|volume=23|issue=2|pages=347|doi=10.1177/1474474015588709|bibcode=2016CuGeo..23..337W |s2cid=148242632}}</ref> Welles used these circumstances to produce a meditation on the nature of fakery, which he called "a new kind of movie … it’s a form, in other words, the ], the personal essay, as opposed to the documentary."<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Ayres|first=Jackson|date=2012|title=Orson Welles's 'Complicitous Critique': Postmodern Paradox in 'F for Fake'|journal=Literature/Film Quarterly|volume=40|issue=1|pages=11}}</ref>

Several storylines are presented in the film, including those of de Hory, Irving, Welles, Howard Hughes and Kodar. About de Hory, we learn that he was a struggling artist who turned to forgery out of desperation, only to see the greater share of the profits from his deceptions go to doubly unscrupulous art dealers. As partial compensation for that injustice, he is maintained in a villa in Ibiza by one of his dealers. What is only hinted at in Welles's documentary is that de Hory had recently served a two-month sentence in a Spanish prison for ] and consorting with criminals. (de Hory would commit ] two years after the initial release of Welles's film, on hearing that Spain had agreed to turn him over to the French authorities.)

Irving's original part in ''F for Fake'' was as de Hory's biographer, but his part grew unexpectedly at some point during production. There has not always been agreement among commentators over just how that production unfolded, but the now-accepted story<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thewag.net/film/f_for_fake.html| title=Hanky-Panky Men: Orson Welles' F for Fake| author=Childers, Doug| date=21 June 2005| access-date=24 February 2010}}</ref> is that the director François Reichenbach shot a documentary about de Hory and Irving before giving his footage to Welles, who then shot additional footage with Reichenbach as his cinematographer.

In the time between the shooting of Reichenbach's documentary and the finishing of Welles's, it became known that Irving had perpetrated a hoax of his own, namely a ] of ] (the hoax was later fictionalized in '']''). This discovery prompted the shooting of still more footage, which then got woven into ''F for Fake''. Interweaving the narratives even more, there are several pieces of footage in the film showing Welles at a party with De Hory, and, at one point, De Hory even signs a painting with a forgery of Welles's signature. Some of Hughes's career is outlined in the form of a parody of the "News on the March" sequence in '']''. Welles also draws parallels between the De Hory and Irving hoaxes and his own brush with early notoriety by including a recreation of part of his 1938 '']'' radio drama, which had simulated a newscast about a Martian invasion and sparked panic among some listeners.

The story about Kodar, her grandfather, and Picasso and some forger paintings that the grandfather supposedly made is presented at the end of the film before Welles reminds the viewer that he only promised to tell the truth for an hour, and that "for the last 17 minutes, I've been lying my head off." In the commentary to the Criterion Collection DVD release of ''F for Fake'', Kodar claims the idea for this segment as her own. She also claims credit for the movie's opening sequence, which consists of shots of a miniskirt-clad Kodar walking down streets while rubbernecking male admirers (unaware that they are being filmed) stop and openly stare. This sequence is described by Kodar as inspired by her feminism; in his narration, Welles claims the footage was originally shot for an unrelated production.

===Filming locations===
], seen in the Oja and Picasso story.]] ], seen in the Oja and Picasso story.]]
*Rome, Italy – Girl-watching sequence * Rome, Italy – Girl-watching sequence
*], Spain ] elements from the original Reichenbach documentary * ], Spain ] elements from the original Reichenbach documentary
*Paris, France ], ], art gallery on ], ''La Méditerranée'' seafood restaurant * Paris, France ], ], art gallery on ], ''La Méditerranée'' seafood restaurant
* ]
*Los Angeles ] The ham sandwich of Howard Hughes<ref>{{cite book |last=Thieme |first=Claudia |title=F for fake, and the growth in complexity of Orson Welles' documentary form |url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?cd=1&id=j0QcAQAAIAAJ&dq=ham+sandwich+f+for+fake+howard+hughes&q=ham+sandwich#search_anchor |publisher=P. Lang|year=1997 |page=95 |isbn= 0-8204-3253-9}}</ref> * Los Angeles ] The ham sandwich of Howard Hughes<ref>{{cite book |last=Thieme |first=Claudia |title=F for fake, and the growth in complexity of Orson Welles' documentary form |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=j0QcAQAAIAAJ&q=ham+sandwich |publisher=P. Lang|year=1997 |page=95 |isbn= 0-8204-3253-9}}</ref>
*] – France * ] – France
* ], France – Orson Welles and Oja Kodar house—editing-room scenes, set for various indoor scenes * ], France – Orson Welles and Oja Kodar house—editing-room scenes, set for various indoor scenes
* ], France – Oja and Picasso story * ], France – Oja and Picasso story
* ] South terminal terrace and main hall * ] South terminal terrace and main hall


== Trailer == ==Release==
===Trailer===
''F for Fake'' was not released in the USA until 1976. When it finally came out, Welles produced a preview "trailer" for it, which was effectively a wholly original 9-minute film, shot and edited in a similar style to the film itself. Apart from some very brief split-second camera shots, the entire film is a self-contained short containing original material starring Welles, ] and ]. No cinema distributor was willing to show the choppy 9-minute film (that suffered from the fact that it was largely created, starring, shot by, narrated and edited by awkward B-movie cinematographer, Graver). Welles allegedly ran out of money making the film and paid Graver by giving him his ]. The dodgy trailer contains even more footage of Welles' muse and girlfriend at the time, the stiffly provocative, yet inexperienced actress/model, Oja, posing with a tiger. The trailer has subsequently been restored in colour, and is included as an extra on some DVD versions of the film.<ref>] and Andrew J. Rausch, ''Making Movies With Orson Welles: A Memoir'' (Scarecrow Press, New York, 2008) p.170</ref> ''F for Fake'' was not released in the USA until 1976. When it finally came out, Welles produced a preview "trailer" for it, which was effectively a wholly original nine-minute film, shot and edited in a similar style to the film itself. Apart from some very brief split-second camera shots, the entire film is a self-contained short containing original material starring Welles, ] and ]. The trailer raises new questions about key people in the main film: Picasso, Kodar, Elmyr, and others. These allegations are supposedly revealed in the main film. They include a ], Oja Kodar's fake name, her tiger (not shown in the film at all), and ] sponsors of Welles's War of the Worlds broadcast. The trailer has subsequently been restored in colour, and is included as an extra on some DVD versions of the film.<ref>] and Andrew J. Rausch, ''Making Movies With Orson Welles: A Memoir'' (Scarecrow Press, New York, 2008) p.170</ref>


== Reception == ===Critical reception===
''F for Fake'' faced widespread popular rejection. Critical reaction ranged from praise to confusion and hostility, with many finding the work to be self-indulgent and/or incoherent. ''F for Fake'' has grown somewhat in stature over the years.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-2596622281/orson-welles-s-complicitous-critique-postmodern| title=Orson Welles's: "Complicitous Critique: Postmodern Paradox in ''F for Fake'' | last=Jackson |first= Ayres| accessdate=April 27, 2014}}</ref> In that the film embraces everything from self-conscious notation of the film process to ironic employment of 1950s-era ] footage, Welles thought he was creating not so much a documentary as a "new kind of film," as he once told writer ].<ref name="Rosenbaum">{{cite web |url=http://www.criterion.com/current/posts/364| title=Orson Welles's Purloined Letter: ''F For Fake''| last=Rosenbaum |first= Jonathan| date=April 25, 2005| accessdate=February 24, 2010}}</ref> ''F for Fake'' is now sometimes referred to as a "]." It currently holds an 89% rating on ] from 36 critics. ''F for Fake'' faced widespread popular rejection. Critical reaction ranged from praise to confusion and hostility, with many finding the work to be self-indulgent or incoherent. ''F for Fake'' has grown somewhat in stature over the years.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-2596622281/orson-welles-s-complicitous-critique-postmodern | title=Orson Welles's: "Complicitous Critique: Postmodern Paradox in ''F for Fake'' | last=Jackson | first=Ayres | access-date=27 April 2014 | archive-date=8 March 2016 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160308042920/https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-2596622281/orson-welles-s-complicitous-critique-postmodern | url-status=dead }}</ref> The film embraces ideas from the self-conscious notation of the film process to the ironic employment of 1950s-era ] footage ('']''). Welles thought he was creating a new form of cinema. When writer ] asked Welles if he was creating a documentary, he replied: “No, not a documentary—a new kind of film."<ref name="Rosenbaum">{{cite web |url=http://www.criterion.com/current/posts/364| title=Orson Welles's Purloined Letter: ''F For Fake''| last=Rosenbaum |first= Jonathan| date=25 April 2005| access-date=24 February 2010}}</ref>


On ] ], the film has an approval rating of 88% based on 50 reviews, with an average rating of 7.79/10. The website's critical consensus reads: "''F for Fake'' playfully poses intriguing questions while proving that even Orson Welles' minor works contain their share of masterful moments."<ref>{{cite web |title=F for Fake (1974) |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/f_for_fake |website=]}}</ref> In July 2021, the film was shown in the Cannes Classics section at the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://thefilmstage.com/2021-cannes-classic-lineup-includes-orson-welles-powell-and-pressburger-tilda-swinton-more/ |title=2021 Cannes Classics Lineup Includes Orson Welles, Powell and Pressburger, Tilda Swinton & More |work=The Film Stage |date=23 June 2021 |access-date=25 June 2021}}</ref>
== Style ==
{{refimprove section|date=July 2014}}
According to some reviews, the ''F for Fake'' ] has possibly paved the way for the modern "attention-deficit" style of ].<ref name="Bromley, Patrick">{{cite web |url=http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/fforfake.php| title=Review of ''F For Fake'': Criterion Collection| author=Bromley, Patrick| date=June 6, 2005| work=DVD Verdict| accessdate=February 24, 2010}}</ref> More likely, Welles was influenced by those that came before, such as the ] and ] filmmakers such as ] and ] who used editing to alternately build and deconstruct. What is unique to the film is the concept of the "unreliable narrator." A key subject of the film itself, which at many points shows Welles sitting at an editing controller, as he narrates and draws self-reflexive attention to the problems with veracity in life and filmmaking.<ref name="Rosenbaum"/> Several filmmakers contributed to the forgery that is "F for Fake" including B-movie cinematographer ] (who contributes all footage filmed in the U.S., as well as some very choppy editing, and his own voice/image as the dubious on-screen "newscaster") as well as Welles' girlfriend and muse, ] (who at one point appears in a series of butt shots as she is ogled both by Welles' camera and by stock footage of males who "see" her). It is in fact a trick of editing and/or creative geography and Welles' first lie in the film, or is it? Who directed these shots? Kodar claims she did. It is unclear where Welles' participation stops and his lesser-known collaborators begins, as the film employs multiple editors, multiple directors, multiple cross cuttings of unrelated footage and the often erratic use of ] as well as multiple voice overs. An example of this appears with a series of near wordless shots of Irving and de Hory seemingly in debate as to whether de Hory ever signed his forgeries (the shots of Irving and de Hory were in fact taken at different times).<ref name="Bromley, Patrick"/>


====Questions of truthfulness====
Welles's autobiographical asides in the film reflect on his ] of '']'', which caused a nationwide panic with its fake news broadcast. In introducing this chapter of his life, Welles declares his uncertainty as to his own authenticity, as he believes he too has engaged in fraud. Interestingly, while the basic facts of the ''War of the Worlds'' incident are correctly given, the apparent excerpts from the play featured in the movie are complete fabrications, including a scene in which President Roosevelt meets the Martian invaders—something which did not happen in the original (fabricated) broadcast.
Author ], a great fan of the film, argued in '']'' that the film was itself largely an intentional effort at fakery by Welles in support of the film's themes. Most directly, Wilson reports that in the BBC documentary ''Orson Welles: Stories of a Life in Film'', Welles stated that "everything in that film was a trick." Secondly, many of the interviews in the film were with people who were themselves directly involved with forgery in one way or another, often making statements that would have been known by the filmmakers to be false, but which were allowed to pass without comment in the film. Similarly, Welles himself made numerous false statements about Oja Kodar in the film. Finally, Wilson points out several scenes which, while presented in a way that implies they were filmed in real time, were upon further inspection clearly fabricated from unrelated pieces of footage in a way guaranteed to mislead the casual viewer. An example of this appears with a series of near-wordless shots of Irving and de Hory seemingly in debate as to whether de Hory ever signed his forgeries; the shots of Irving and de Hory were in fact taken at different times.<ref name="Bromley, Patrick">{{cite web |url=http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/fforfake.php| title=Review of ''F For Fake'': Criterion Collection| author=Bromley, Patrick| date=6 June 2005| work=DVD Verdict| access-date=24 February 2010}}</ref>


Welles's autobiographical asides in the film reflect on his ] of '']'', which he alleges caused a nationwide panic with its fake news broadcast. In introducing this chapter of his life, Welles declares his uncertainty as to his own authenticity, as he believes he too has engaged in fraud. While the basic facts of ''The War of the Worlds'' incident are correctly given, the apparent excerpts from the play featured in the movie are fabrications, including a scene in which President Roosevelt meets the Martian invaders—something which did not happen in the original broadcast.
== Questions of truthfulness ==
Author ], a great fan of the film, argued in '']'' that the film was itself largely an intentional effort at fakery by Welles in support of the film's themes. Most directly, Wilson reports that in the BBC documentary ''Orson Welles: Stories of a Life in Film'', Welles stated that "everything in that film was a trick." Secondly, many of the interviews in the film were with people who were themselves directly involved with forgery in one way or another, often making statements that would have been known by the filmmakers to be false, but which were allowed to pass without comment in the film. Similarly, Welles himself made numerous false statements about Oja Kodar in the film. Finally, Wilson points out several scenes which, while presented in a way that implies they were filmed in real time, were upon further inspection clearly fabricated from unrelated pieces of footage in a way guaranteed to mislead the casual viewer.


== Home-video releases == ===Home media releases===
* 1995 Home Vision Cinema, Janus Films VHS (FAK 010), July 25, 1995<ref>Liebenson, David, . '']'', July 23, 1995</ref> * 1995 Home Vision Cinema, Janus Films VHS (FAK 010), 25 July 1995<ref>Liebenson, David, . '']'', 23 July 1995</ref>
* 2005 ], Region 1 DVD (Spine #288), April 26, 2005 – Two-disc special edition including audio commentary by Oja Kodar and Gary Graver, an introduction by Peter Bogdanovich, and the documentary ''Orson Welles: One-Man Band'' (1995)<ref> at The Criterion Collection</ref> * 1995 ], Laserdisc (Spine #260), 27 July 1995 – Single disc edition, with the special feature of the Theatrical Trailer contained after the film
* 2005 ], Region 1 DVD (Spine #288), 26 April 2005 – Two-disc special edition including audio commentary by Oja Kodar and Gary Graver, an introduction by Peter Bogdanovich, and the documentary ''Orson Welles: One-Man Band'' (1995)<ref> at The Criterion Collection</ref>
* 2009 ] Directors Suite, Region 4 DVD, May 20, 2009 – Special features include audio commentary by Adrian Martin, Monash University, and the documentary ''Orson Welles: One-Man Band'' (1995)<ref> at Madman Entertainment</ref> * 2009 ] Directors Suite, Region 4 DVD, 20 May 2009 – Special features include audio commentary by Adrian Martin, Monash University, and the documentary ''Orson Welles: One-Man Band'' (1995)<ref> at Madman Entertainment</ref>
* 2010 Eureka Video: Masters of Cinema, Region 2 DVD (Spine #31) – Special features include audio commentary by cinematographer ] and Bill Krohn, and ] on ''F For Fake''<ref> at Masters of Cinema</ref> * 2010 Eureka Video: Masters of Cinema, Region 2 DVD (Spine #31) – Special features include audio commentary by cinematographer ] and Bill Krohn, and ] on ''F For Fake''<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120616002516/http://eurekavideo.co.uk/moc/catalogue/f-for-fake/ |date=16 June 2012 }} at Masters of Cinema</ref>


==See also== ==See also==
* '']'' - a fictionalized retelling of the life of Orson Welles. Directed by Richard Linklater, starring Zac Efron
* ]
* '']'' - a 1987 pseudo-documentary directed by ] about a filmmaker who throws a Valentine's Day party at an old movie theater that is about to be demolished and then quizzes his guests on camera about their lives.
* ] – a 2015 Canadian ] film directed by ] featuring dozens of amateur actors and that examines the art and craft of movie acting, and the desire for movie stardom.
* ] – a 1995 Iranian docufiction film directed by Mohsen Makhmalbaf that shows various everyday people being auditioned and explaining their reason for wanting to act in a film. * '']'' – a 1978 documentary film directed by and starring Orson Welles about the making of his 1951 production '']''.
* '']'' – a 1995 Iranian docufiction film that shows various everyday people being auditioned and explaining their reason for wanting to act in a film.
* ] - a 1987 pseudo-documentary directed by Henry Jaglom about a filmmaker who throws a Valentine's Day party at an old movie theater that is about to be demolished and then quizzes his guests on camera about their lives.
* ] – a 1978 documentary film directed by and starring Orson Welles about the making of his award-winning1952 production Othello.


== Bibliography == == Bibliography ==
Line 142: Line 142:


== References == == References ==
{{Reflist|2}} {{Reflist}}


== External links == == External links ==
{{wikiquote}} {{wikiquote}}
* {{IMDb title|id=0072962|title=F for Fake}} * {{IMDb title|id=0072962}}
* {{Amg movie|125386|F for Fake}} * {{TCMDb title|id=486939}}
* {{rotten-tomatoes|f_for_fake|F for Fake}} * {{rotten-tomatoes|f_for_fake}}
* by Vincent Canby, ''New York Times'', September 28, 1975 * by Vincent Canby, ''New York Times'', 28 September 1975
* Article by Robert Castle, August 2004 * Article by Robert Castle, August 2004
* * an essay by ] at the ]

{{Orson Welles|state=autocollapse}} {{Orson Welles}}


] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
] ]
] ]
Line 166: Line 165:
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 15:56, 22 December 2024

1974 film by Orson Welles

F for Fake
Black and white image of Orson Welles, dark hat covering his brow and his dark beard both blending into the dark backgroundUS theatrical release poster
Directed by
Written by
Produced by
  • François Reichenbach
  • Dominique Antoine
  • Richard Drewett
Starring
Cinematography
Edited by
Music byMichel Legrand
Distributed byPlanfilm
Specialty Films
Release date
  • 1973 (1973) (San Sebastián Film Festival)
Running time88 minutes
CountriesFrance
Iran
West Germany
LanguageEnglish
Box office182,857 admissions (France)

F for Fake (French: Vérités et mensonges, "Truths and lies"; Spanish: Fraude, "Fraud") is a 1973 docudrama film co-written, directed by, and starring Orson Welles who worked on the film alongside François Reichenbach, Oja Kodar, and Gary Graver. Initially released in 1974, it focuses on Elmyr de Hory's recounting of his career as a professional art forger; de Hory's story serves as the backdrop for a meandering investigation of the natures of authorship and authenticity, as well as the basis of the value of art. Far from serving as a traditional documentary on de Hory, the film also incorporates Welles's companion Oja Kodar, hoax biographer Clifford Irving and Orson Welles as himself. F for Fake is sometimes considered an example of a film essay.

In addition to the 88-minute film, in 1976, Welles also shot and edited a self-contained nine-minute short film as a "trailer", almost entirely composed of original material not found in the main film itself.

Plot

This article's plot summary may be too long or excessively detailed. Please help improve it by removing unnecessary details and making it more concise. (March 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The film opens with Welles performing magic tricks for some children while Kodar watches nearby. Welles quotes Robert-Houdin to the effect that a magician is just an actor. Welles promises that for the next hour everything in the film will be based on solid fact. Kodar is then shown strolling around a street in a miniskirt while being ogled by the men on the street. Welles reveals the footage is taken from another experiment about girl-watching, where Kodar deliberately drew attention to herself and the men were unaware they were being filmed. Welles says her story will continue later in the film, and then narrates the story of Elmyr de Hory, an art forger who sold many fake paintings to museums and collectors all over the world. De Hory is shown throwing a dinner party at his home in Ibiza and being feted by European society, although he dances around the question of whether he is guilty or not. One of those filmed is Clifford Irving, who had published a biography of de Hory called Fake, and was later revealed to have been the forger of a fake "authorized biography" of Howard Hughes. Welles discusses the irony of Irving commenting on de Hory's forgery, while having committed a version of it himself (Welles states his belief that Irving must have been in the process of working on the hoax at the time he was filmed for the de Hory project). Irving and de Hory tell about the art dealers who were fooled by the forgeries, and Welles considers the question whether this means art dealers and appraisers are fake also.

Welles presents more of Irving's story of having had secret contact with Hughes, and the odd stories of Hughes's behavior that may or may not have been true. He wonders if believing such stories makes a person credulous or not, and questions the true wisdom of so-called experts, who verified Irving's forgery as authentic. Reichenbach is shown telling how de Hory provided him with several paintings of questionable authenticity, but the art dealers he gave them to were willfully blind to it. Welles notes that de Hory does not even own the house he lives in; it is provided for him by an art dealer. Welles recounts his own past use of fakery: how he got a job in Ireland by falsely claiming to be a famous New York actor, and how his broadcast of The War of the Worlds made deliberate use of fake news to enhance the story. He also notes the coincidence that his first film Citizen Kane was originally going to be a fictionalized version of Howard Hughes.

Irving describes how de Hory was nearly destitute when younger and subsisted in America by making and selling forgeries that were indistinguishable from the real works, while remaining one step ahead of the law through frequent relocations. He finally moved to Ibiza, but was not prosecuted for lack of witnesses to the actual forging, as well as the scandal that might be aroused by revealing the depth of the art market's complicity in the deception. De Hory insists he never signed any forgery, and Welles wonders whether, given the fact that all art eventually falls away to ruin, a signature truly matters to any art work. He illustrates the point by shots of the cathedral of Chartres, pointing out that the names of the men who created the magnificent building and the sculptures which adorn it are unknown. They did not sign their work, but it has endured.

Welles finally presents Kodar's story: she holidayed in the same village as Picasso, who noticed her and painted 22 pieces with her as the model. She insisted she be allowed to keep the paintings, but later when Picasso read about an acclaimed exhibit of 22 new pieces of his, he flew there in a rage, only to discover the pieces were all forgeries. Kodar took Picasso to her grandfather, the forger. In a verbal re-enactment by Welles (grandfather) and Kodar (Picasso), the forger defended his work with pride, saying he invented a new Picasso period. The grandfather suggests that the forgeries go un-reported, to allow him an artistic legacy that Picasso already has. Picasso angrily demanded the paintings back, which is impossible because the grandfather had burned them. Welles then confesses that he had promised everything in the "next hour" was true, and that hour had already passed. He admits the entire story of Kodar, her grandfather, and Picasso was made up. He apologizes, quotes Picasso's statement that art is a lie that makes us see the truth, and bids the audience good evening.

Cast

Elmyr de Hory

Others

Production

Background

Orson Welles was hired to edit a documentary by François Reichenbach about the art forger Elmyr de Hory. The film grew over time to encompass de Hory, as well as de Hory's biographer Clifford Irving, who was revealed to be a forger himself. Keith Woodward explains: "following Irving’s hoax, Welles and his cinematographer, Gary Graver, shifted gears, scrambling to keep up with the Hughes affair, adding new shots, re-thinking the narrative, re-editing, re-combining different themes, incorporating emerging material." Welles used these circumstances to produce a meditation on the nature of fakery, which he called "a new kind of movie … it’s a form, in other words, the essay, the personal essay, as opposed to the documentary."

Several storylines are presented in the film, including those of de Hory, Irving, Welles, Howard Hughes and Kodar. About de Hory, we learn that he was a struggling artist who turned to forgery out of desperation, only to see the greater share of the profits from his deceptions go to doubly unscrupulous art dealers. As partial compensation for that injustice, he is maintained in a villa in Ibiza by one of his dealers. What is only hinted at in Welles's documentary is that de Hory had recently served a two-month sentence in a Spanish prison for homosexuality and consorting with criminals. (de Hory would commit suicide two years after the initial release of Welles's film, on hearing that Spain had agreed to turn him over to the French authorities.)

Irving's original part in F for Fake was as de Hory's biographer, but his part grew unexpectedly at some point during production. There has not always been agreement among commentators over just how that production unfolded, but the now-accepted story is that the director François Reichenbach shot a documentary about de Hory and Irving before giving his footage to Welles, who then shot additional footage with Reichenbach as his cinematographer.

In the time between the shooting of Reichenbach's documentary and the finishing of Welles's, it became known that Irving had perpetrated a hoax of his own, namely a fabricated "authorized biography" of Howard Hughes (the hoax was later fictionalized in The Hoax). This discovery prompted the shooting of still more footage, which then got woven into F for Fake. Interweaving the narratives even more, there are several pieces of footage in the film showing Welles at a party with De Hory, and, at one point, De Hory even signs a painting with a forgery of Welles's signature. Some of Hughes's career is outlined in the form of a parody of the "News on the March" sequence in Citizen Kane. Welles also draws parallels between the De Hory and Irving hoaxes and his own brush with early notoriety by including a recreation of part of his 1938 War of the Worlds radio drama, which had simulated a newscast about a Martian invasion and sparked panic among some listeners.

The story about Kodar, her grandfather, and Picasso and some forger paintings that the grandfather supposedly made is presented at the end of the film before Welles reminds the viewer that he only promised to tell the truth for an hour, and that "for the last 17 minutes, I've been lying my head off." In the commentary to the Criterion Collection DVD release of F for Fake, Kodar claims the idea for this segment as her own. She also claims credit for the movie's opening sequence, which consists of shots of a miniskirt-clad Kodar walking down streets while rubbernecking male admirers (unaware that they are being filmed) stop and openly stare. This sequence is described by Kodar as inspired by her feminism; in his narration, Welles claims the footage was originally shot for an unrelated production.

Filming locations

The Donjon de Houdan, seen in the Oja and Picasso story.

Release

Trailer

F for Fake was not released in the USA until 1976. When it finally came out, Welles produced a preview "trailer" for it, which was effectively a wholly original nine-minute film, shot and edited in a similar style to the film itself. Apart from some very brief split-second camera shots, the entire film is a self-contained short containing original material starring Welles, Gary Graver and Oja Kodar. The trailer raises new questions about key people in the main film: Picasso, Kodar, Elmyr, and others. These allegations are supposedly revealed in the main film. They include a wig, Oja Kodar's fake name, her tiger (not shown in the film at all), and extraterrestrial sponsors of Welles's War of the Worlds broadcast. The trailer has subsequently been restored in colour, and is included as an extra on some DVD versions of the film.

Critical reception

F for Fake faced widespread popular rejection. Critical reaction ranged from praise to confusion and hostility, with many finding the work to be self-indulgent or incoherent. F for Fake has grown somewhat in stature over the years. The film embraces ideas from the self-conscious notation of the film process to the ironic employment of 1950s-era B movie footage (Earth vs. the Flying Saucers). Welles thought he was creating a new form of cinema. When writer Jonathan Rosenbaum asked Welles if he was creating a documentary, he replied: “No, not a documentary—a new kind of film."

On review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes, the film has an approval rating of 88% based on 50 reviews, with an average rating of 7.79/10. The website's critical consensus reads: "F for Fake playfully poses intriguing questions while proving that even Orson Welles' minor works contain their share of masterful moments." In July 2021, the film was shown in the Cannes Classics section at the 2021 Cannes Film Festival.

Questions of truthfulness

Author Robert Anton Wilson, a great fan of the film, argued in Cosmic Trigger III: My Life After Death that the film was itself largely an intentional effort at fakery by Welles in support of the film's themes. Most directly, Wilson reports that in the BBC documentary Orson Welles: Stories of a Life in Film, Welles stated that "everything in that film was a trick." Secondly, many of the interviews in the film were with people who were themselves directly involved with forgery in one way or another, often making statements that would have been known by the filmmakers to be false, but which were allowed to pass without comment in the film. Similarly, Welles himself made numerous false statements about Oja Kodar in the film. Finally, Wilson points out several scenes which, while presented in a way that implies they were filmed in real time, were upon further inspection clearly fabricated from unrelated pieces of footage in a way guaranteed to mislead the casual viewer. An example of this appears with a series of near-wordless shots of Irving and de Hory seemingly in debate as to whether de Hory ever signed his forgeries; the shots of Irving and de Hory were in fact taken at different times.

Welles's autobiographical asides in the film reflect on his 1938 radio adaptation of The War of the Worlds, which he alleges caused a nationwide panic with its fake news broadcast. In introducing this chapter of his life, Welles declares his uncertainty as to his own authenticity, as he believes he too has engaged in fraud. While the basic facts of The War of the Worlds incident are correctly given, the apparent excerpts from the play featured in the movie are fabrications, including a scene in which President Roosevelt meets the Martian invaders—something which did not happen in the original broadcast.

Home media releases

  • 1995 Home Vision Cinema, Janus Films VHS (FAK 010), 25 July 1995
  • 1995 The Criterion Collection, Laserdisc (Spine #260), 27 July 1995 – Single disc edition, with the special feature of the Theatrical Trailer contained after the film
  • 2005 The Criterion Collection, Region 1 DVD (Spine #288), 26 April 2005 – Two-disc special edition including audio commentary by Oja Kodar and Gary Graver, an introduction by Peter Bogdanovich, and the documentary Orson Welles: One-Man Band (1995)
  • 2009 Madman Entertainment Directors Suite, Region 4 DVD, 20 May 2009 – Special features include audio commentary by Adrian Martin, Monash University, and the documentary Orson Welles: One-Man Band (1995)
  • 2010 Eureka Video: Masters of Cinema, Region 2 DVD (Spine #31) – Special features include audio commentary by cinematographer Gary Graver and Bill Krohn, and Jonathan Rosenbaum on F For Fake

See also

  • Me and Orson Welles - a fictionalized retelling of the life of Orson Welles. Directed by Richard Linklater, starring Zac Efron
  • Someone to Love - a 1987 pseudo-documentary directed by Henry Jaglom about a filmmaker who throws a Valentine's Day party at an old movie theater that is about to be demolished and then quizzes his guests on camera about their lives.
  • Filming Othello – a 1978 documentary film directed by and starring Orson Welles about the making of his 1951 production Othello.
  • Hello Cinema – a 1995 Iranian docufiction film that shows various everyday people being auditioned and explaining their reason for wanting to act in a film.

Bibliography

  • Claudia Thieme, F for Fake: And the Growth in Complexity of Orson Welles' Documentary Form (Peter Lang Pub., 1997) 174pp.

References

  1. Orson Welles box office information in France at Box Office Story
  2. Khaldi, Tarik (14 July 2021). "Fraude (F for Fake): Orson Welles trata de discernir lo verdadero de lo falso". Cannes Film Festival. Retrieved 26 December 2022.
  3. This contradicts published accounts that the film was inspired by the life of William Randolph Hearst.
  4. Woodward, Keith (2016). "The Speculative Geography of Orson Welles". Cultural Geographies. 23 (2): 347. Bibcode:2016CuGeo..23..337W. doi:10.1177/1474474015588709. S2CID 148242632.
  5. Ayres, Jackson (2012). "Orson Welles's 'Complicitous Critique': Postmodern Paradox in 'F for Fake'". Literature/Film Quarterly. 40 (1): 11.
  6. Childers, Doug (21 June 2005). "Hanky-Panky Men: Orson Welles' F for Fake". Retrieved 24 February 2010.
  7. Thieme, Claudia (1997). F for fake, and the growth in complexity of Orson Welles' documentary form. P. Lang. p. 95. ISBN 0-8204-3253-9.
  8. Gary Graver and Andrew J. Rausch, Making Movies With Orson Welles: A Memoir (Scarecrow Press, New York, 2008) p.170
  9. Jackson, Ayres. "Orson Welles's: "Complicitous Critique: Postmodern Paradox in F for Fake". Archived from the original on 8 March 2016. Retrieved 27 April 2014.
  10. Rosenbaum, Jonathan (25 April 2005). "Orson Welles's Purloined Letter: F For Fake". Retrieved 24 February 2010.
  11. "F for Fake (1974)". Rotten Tomatoes.
  12. "2021 Cannes Classics Lineup Includes Orson Welles, Powell and Pressburger, Tilda Swinton & More". The Film Stage. 23 June 2021. Retrieved 25 June 2021.
  13. Bromley, Patrick (6 June 2005). "Review of F For Fake: Criterion Collection". DVD Verdict. Retrieved 24 February 2010.
  14. Liebenson, David, "Video: 'F for Fake' Joins Orson Welles Rarities". Los Angeles Times, 23 July 1995
  15. F for Fake at The Criterion Collection
  16. F for Fake at Madman Entertainment
  17. F for Fake Archived 16 June 2012 at the Wayback Machine at Masters of Cinema

External links

Orson Welles
Feature films
Shorts
Unfinished films
Partly directed
Adaptations
Television
Theatre
Radio
Spoken-word
Books
Related
Categories: