| Revision as of 19:48, 30 March 2016 editSmartse (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators49,355 edits cs← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:53, 30 January 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Added missing end tags to discussion close footer to reduce Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''delete'''. ] (]) 12:34, 8 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} | |||
| :{{la|Chukwuemeka Fred Agbata}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) | :{{la|Chukwuemeka Fred Agbata}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) | ||
| :({{Find sources AFD|Chukwuemeka Fred Agbata}}) | :({{Find sources AFD|Chukwuemeka Fred Agbata}}) | ||
| I have reviewed the sources cited and only (which I can't access) provides in-depth coverage of the subject. I've also looked for other sources but have been unable to find anything better. Unless I've missed something, the multiple in-depth sources requirement of ] is not met. ] (]) 17:44, 30 March 2016 (UTC) | I have reviewed the sources cited and only (which I can't access) provides in-depth coverage of the subject. I've also looked for other sources but have been unable to find anything better. Unless I've missed something, the multiple in-depth sources requirement of ] is not met. ] (]) 17:44, 30 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :I found an archived version of that source and it strengthens my opinion about the lack of notability as |
:I found an archived version of that source and it strengthens my opinion about the lack of notability as the interview is completely self-serving and indicates that the source is not RS (i.e. no fact checking). ] (]) 19:48, 30 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 18:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 18:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)</small> | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 18:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 18:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)</small> | ||
| Line 14: | Line 21: | ||
| *'''Comment''' I am interested in this after the investigation mentioned - basically articles where the references were not supported by the sources. ] (]) 19:00, 30 March 2016 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' I am interested in this after the investigation mentioned - basically articles where the references were not supported by the sources. ] (]) 19:00, 30 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
| **Can we just keep this discussion focussed on notability? ] (]) 19:48, 30 March 2016 (UTC) | **Can we just keep this discussion focussed on notability? ] (]) 19:48, 30 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
| ***I have no idea about notability, given that half the links did not work, and the links which did work were just passing references. ] (]) 20:32, 30 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' Non-notable blogger and digital marketer. The source that verifies that ''Agbata has been identified as a digital marketing expert in Nigeria'' is to an announcement of a panel he was part of. I've been on dozens of panels (and I'm sure many other people have to) and being asked by the panel organizer to participate isn't evidence of notability. ] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">] ]</sup> 18:37, 3 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Delete''', fails the essential test of having fewer references than I could muster for an article about myself. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 09:34, 4 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 16:53, 30 January 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 12:34, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Chukwuemeka Fred Agbata
- Chukwuemeka Fred Agbata (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I have reviewed the sources cited and only this interview (which I can't access) provides in-depth coverage of the subject. I've also looked for other sources but have been unable to find anything better. Unless I've missed something, the multiple in-depth sources requirement of WP:BIO is not met. SmartSE (talk) 17:44, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- I found an archived version of that source here and it strengthens my opinion about the lack of notability as the interview is completely self-serving and indicates that the source is not RS (i.e. no fact checking). SmartSE (talk) 19:48, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I am interested in this after the investigation mentioned here - basically articles where the references were not supported by the sources. Peter Damian (talk) 19:00, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Can we just keep this discussion focussed on notability? SmartSE (talk) 19:48, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- I have no idea about notability, given that half the links did not work, and the links which did work were just passing references. Peter Damian (talk) 20:32, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Can we just keep this discussion focussed on notability? SmartSE (talk) 19:48, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable blogger and digital marketer. The source that verifies that Agbata has been identified as a digital marketing expert in Nigeria is to an announcement of a panel he was part of. I've been on dozens of panels (and I'm sure many other people have to) and being asked by the panel organizer to participate isn't evidence of notability. Liz 18:37, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, fails the essential test of having fewer references than I could muster for an article about myself. Guy (Help!) 09:34, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.