Misplaced Pages

:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:14, 2 May 2016 editEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,204 edits →User:Patrick1425 reported by User:EvergreenFir (Result: Blocked): Closing← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:36, 25 December 2024 edit undoJasca Ducato (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,533 edits →User:ChasePlowman2014 reported by User:Happily888 (Result: Blocked 2 weeks) 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Noticeboard for edit warring}}
__NEWSECTIONLINK__{{no admin backlog}}
<noinclude>{{pp-move-indef }}{{/Header}}] ] <!--Adds protection template automatically if semi-protected--><noinclude>{{#if:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|{{pp|small=yes}}}}__NEWSECTIONLINK__{{no admin backlog}}{{/Header}}] ]
{{pp-move|small=yes}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}} |archiveheader = {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}}
|maxarchivesize = 250K |maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 315 |counter = 490
|algo = old(48h) |algo = old(2d)
|key = 0a3bba89e703569428f2aab1add75bd7d7d1583d2d1f397783aee23fda62b06f |key = 0a3bba89e703569428f2aab1add75bd7d7d1583d2d1f397783aee23fda62b06f
|archive = Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive%(counter)d |archive = Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive%(counter)d
}}</noinclude>
}}</noinclude><!--<?xml version="1.0"?><api><query><pages><page pageid="3741656" ns="4" title="Misplaced Pages:Administrators&#039; noticeboard/Edit warring"><revisions><rev>=Reports=>
<!-- NOTE: THE *BOTTOM* IS THE PLACE FOR NEW REPORTS. -->
NOTE: THE *BOTTOM* IS THE PLACE FOR NEW REPORTS. -->
== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked for 24 hours) ==


== ] reported by ] (Result: Warned users) ==
;Page: {{pagelinks|Liwa Ahfad Saladin ‎}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|Anders165}}


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Giganotosaurus}} <br />
;Previous version reverted to:
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|PaleoFile}}


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
;Diffs of the user's reverts:
#] "Undid revision 717172652 by Dr.K. (talk)"
# {{diff2|717172504|04:35, 26 April 2016 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 717171663 by ] (])"
# {{diff2|717171615|04:27, 26 April 2016 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 717168537 by ] (])"
# {{diff2|717074690|15:55, 25 April 2016 (UTC)}} "Which sources ? Only Pro-FSA sources claim self. This group is not Kurdish and not represent majority of Syrian Kurds. YOU CAN create a group under the name of Syrian Kurds, but you cannot hide the true."
# {{diff2|716978305|01:05, 25 April 2016 (UTC)}} "This is not Kurdish group. They just claim it."


;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning: '''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
#
# {{diff2|717171288|04:24, 26 April 2016 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring on ]. (]]])"
#
# {{diff2|717171430|04:25, 26 April 2016 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring on ]. (]]])"
#
# {{diff2|717172676|04:37, 26 April 2016 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring on ]. (]]])"
#


;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:




;<u>Comments:</u>


'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' (regarding another now-dormant edit war on a related page)
Rapid-fire edit-warring across multiple articles. Does not stop despite multiple warnings. His recent contributions consist of pure edit-warring across multiple articles. Large-scale, bot-like edit-warring disruption without any discussion. ] ] 04:43, 26 April 2016 (UTC)


'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' N/A, did not revert and talked directly to editor instead
*'''Addendum''': ]: {{tq|Yes, we know that Armenians were massacred by the Turks . bla.bla.bla.... XD}}. ] ] 04:51, 26 April 2016 (UTC)


'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''
*<s>Blocked as a sock by {{u|Gogo Dodo}}</s>. ] ] 04:57, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
:Just curious {{u|Gogo Dodo}}, whose sock is it? ] (]) 05:01, 26 April 2016 (UTC)


] | ] 20:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
* {{AN3|b|24 hours}}. I think I misread the editing pattern as the usual Vgleer sock that undoes Dr.K.'s edits. However, they are still edit warring, so I reset the block to 24 hours. -- ] (]) 05:10, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
*Both users have been {{AN3|w}}. ] (]) 21:14, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
:*I struck my comment above, but I still wish to thank you for stopping this disruption. ] ] 05:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
*:Those users and {{userlinks|Mei23448}} seems continuing edit wars on '']'' and '']'' articles.
*:1.
*:2.
*:3.
*:4.
*:5.
*:6.
*:In addition, PaleoFile posted personal attack on talk page of Mei23448.
*:Both users does not provide reliable sources, PaleoFile only proposing X post in edit summaries and cite nothing, while Mei23448 also does not cite anything to change. Both users needs to be blocked. (Jens Lallensack seems only trying to revert vandalism, so is not problematic than those two) ] (]) 14:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
*::17 tons for Sachicasaurus has been debunked so I changed it and some user cant accept that his favourite animal isnt as big as he wants. ] (]) 18:35, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
*:::If you have a dispute, you may discuss it on the article's ]. ] | ] 23:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
*::Also 15 ton for Sachicasaurus is based on the Sachicasaurus reconstruction from Diocles. ] (]) 21:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 24 hours) ==
*{{ping|Gogo Dodo}} Very likely a sock of {{user|Sedej}}, doing exact same edits as Sedej did. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 09:18, 27 April 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
*{{ping|Gogo Dodo}} Anders165 started the large-scale edit-warring as soon as they got unblocked. ] ] 15:31, 27 April 2016 (UTC)


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Lindy Li}} <br />
:*{{ping|Dr.K.}} and {{ping|EtienneDolet}} Sorry that I wasn't around to deal with this. I see that the SPI settled this matter. -- ] (]) 04:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Napoleonjosephine2020}}


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
== ] reported by ] (Result: Stale) ==


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Dangerous Woman (song)}} <br />
#
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|166.170.34.148}}
#
#
#


<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. -->


Previous version reverted to:


<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. -->
Diffs of the user's reverts:
#
#
#
#
#
#
#


'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary -->
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. -->
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:


'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' Zilch.
<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too -->
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''
<u>Comments:</u> <br />


<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ -->
* {{AN3|s}} ] <small>(])</small> 15:21, 30 April 2016 (UTC)


Note: I am not involved in this situation whatsoever, just found this in recent changes. ] • ] • ] 05:16, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
==] (Result: Page protected)==
Someone restore order, please.—] <small>]/]</small> 17:48, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
:An editor who doesn't care about a WP policy aka ] aka the inclusion of redlinks which was discussed 4 months ago and a legal article editor was told to cease doing it. WP guidelines say not to put them in and there is no consensus for otherwise. Note the editor was advised on his talk page of both seealso guidelines and the December 2015 talk page discussion If this editor wants to change consensus on redlinks which is also covered under ], he needs to go to Seealso's or REDNOT's talk page.], is the complaint department really on ] 18:01, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
:*The manual of style is not policy. 3RR is, though. I've got you bang to rights, WilliamJE, and I would advise you to restore the stable revision voluntarily.—] <small>]/]</small> 18:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
::Guideline or policy, the consensus is no redlinks per both ] and ]. You want to change it, take it to the above mentioned talk pages.], is the complaint department really on ] 18:19, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
::*I am under no duty to watchlist obscure manual of style subpages in order to prevent a consensus of about six editors from coming up with stupid, ill-considered, one-size-fits-all rules that screw up thousands of articles.—] <small>]/]</small> 19:08, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
{{od}} I have removed redlinks per WP guidelines, and other links already mentioned in the body of the article. Stability restored, guidelines followed, suggest all drop it now. ''']<sup>]</sup>''' 19:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
*Normally, I would. In this case, I think not. I invite you to look at this editor's contribution history, talk page history, and . What we have here is someone on a ]. Administrator intervention is warranted.—] <small>]/]</small> 19:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
:*It is not a crusade to follow Misplaced Pages guidelines. It is merely ensuring some consistency is followed, and good practice. ''']<sup>]</sup>''' 19:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
: To help dropping sticks, I protected the article for three days.--] (]) 19:29, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
:: ''Really?''—] <small>]/]</small> 19:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
*{{AN3|p}} ]] 12:33, 29 April 2016 (UTC)


:The editor whose revisions I am trying to undo publicly attacked the subject as an "opportunistic grifter". No one who uses such inflammatory language should be editing the page of this subject. This is common sense and journalism 101. He is clearly motivated by animus against her and should not be editing her page. Why is this even in question? ] (]) 05:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
== ] reported by ] (Result: Page protected – consider dispute resolution) ==
::@]
::"This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule." Also, "When reporting a user here, own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand ] and the definitions below first." I am not involved, don't complain to me please. Nothing I can do here. ] • ] • ] 05:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
:::You reported me because I tried to stop someone from violating Li's page! Why is the saboteur getting a free pass? He's clearly motivated by animus and admitted as much on her talk page. ] (]) 05:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
::::Did you read my comment? You and the other person will have behavior analyzed and decisions will be made accordingly. I'm not singling you out since I have no idea what's happening, you just happened to start the edit war. ] • ] • ] 05:28, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
::::Napoleon, I think this is a manifestly unfair characterization of what occurred on my talk page (not yours). , for those curious. ] (]) 05:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
*{{AN3|b|24 hours}} ] ] 06:47, 23 December 2024 (UTC)


== ] and ] reported by ] (Result: Page already protected) ==
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|UFC 198}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Sdpdude9}}


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Warburg effect (oncology)}} <br />
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. -->
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|2601:40:CE00:1590:24F6:A73A:9F20:74C}} and {{userlinks|2601:40:CE00:1590:80BC:3313:5A8D:AACE}}


Previous version reverted to: '''Previous version reverted to:'''


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. -->
#
Diffs of the user's reverts:
# #
# #
# # (second IP)
#


<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary -->
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. -->
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:


<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too -->
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


<u>Comments:</u> <br />


'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ -->
Instead of blocking both users - which would be completely warranted here, I have fully-protected the page for a week. I would encourage both parties in the future to work out issues on the talkpage, instead of edit-warring over something like this. *{{AN3|pe}} ]] 12:38, 29 April 2016 (UTC)


'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' N/A, did not participate in reverts. Warned first IP on their own talk page
== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==


'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Dallon Weekes}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Factoidmactoid}}


<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. -->
I believe both IPs are the same person. The second IP's first edit is a stating {{tq|I'm not Ravidmurthy, but I am the one who has been doing most of the editing here.}}, and after leaving that and another comment proceeded to make the same reversion (#4 above) as the other IP, a little more than 2 hours after #3. {{userlinks|CipherRephic}} was also involved in the edit war, but agreed to stop after being warned and has not broken 3RR. ] | ] 21:12, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
*{{AN3|p}} ] (]) 16:58, 25 December 2024 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 2 weeks) ==
Previous version reverted to:


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Marc Benioff}}
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. -->
Diffs of the user's reverts:
#
#
#
#


'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|99.98.190.59}}
<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary -->
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. -->
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too -->
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: and


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
<u>Comments:</u> <br />
# {{diff2|1265027253|18:21, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
The user reverts with the same reason despite my multiple attempts to resolve the issue on their talk page. The edits of mine are completely reasonable and have stated my reasons of the edits on his talk page, to no avail. The user seems they are the creator of the article and are only active due to the current edit war. ''']''' ] 07:33, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
# {{diff2|1265009969|16:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1264902002|03:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1264865734|23:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"


'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
Although no 3RR is applicable due to his reverts being at somewhat of a slow pace, I am not optimistic one bit that the user will stop the unreasonable reverts without communication. ''']''' ] 05:44, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
# {{diff2|1265024674|18:05, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Caution: Unconstructive editing on ]."
# {{diff2|1265033023|18:58, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule."


'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ -->
# {{diff2|1265024924|18:07, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "/* Early life/ethnic background */ more"


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 48 hours) ==
*{{AN3|b|2 weeks}} ] (]) 16:41, 25 December 2024 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 2 weeks) ==
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Talk:Social justice warrior}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|2602:30A:C06E:EDC0:652E:487:B35:DF60}}


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Dune: Part Two}}
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. -->
Diffs of the user's reverts:
#
#
#
#


'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|ChasePlowman2014}}
<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary -->
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. -->
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
<u>Comments:</u> <br />
IP is disruptively removing comments of other editors. ] (]) 13:29, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

*I'm removing blatant personal attacks. They should also be removed from edit summaries and the user making the attacks should be blocked. ] (]) 14:55, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ -->
*{{AN3|b|48 hours}}, along with their /64 range, since the comment on this page is already from another IP in the range. Quite apart from the edit warring, you're not supposed to remove other people's comments on talkpages, not even once. ] &#124; ] 15:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==

;Page: {{pagelinks|San Marino at the 2016 Summer Olympics}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|Raymarcbadz}}

;Previous version reverted to:

;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff|oldid=717574632|diff=717736021|label=Consecutive edits made from 12:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC) to 12:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)}}
## {{diff2|717735979|12:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)}} "Why are the shooting tables do not match those from the other NOCs?"
## {{diff2|717736021|12:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff|oldid=717569424|diff=717574341|label=Consecutive edits made from 14:27, 28 April 2016 (UTC) to 14:27, 28 April 2016 (UTC)}}
## {{diff2|717574313|14:27, 28 April 2016 (UTC)}} "consistency with the other NOC pages"
## {{diff2|717574341|14:27, 28 April 2016 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|717506652|03:57, 28 April 2016 (UTC)}} "STOP HARASSING MY EDIT. DON'T STRESSED ME OUT. DON'T ASSUME ME THAT I'M NOT HUMAN."
# {{diff2|717505883|03:48, 28 April 2016 (UTC)}} "The tables must be separated."

;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:


;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


;<u>Comments:</u>

User clearly has ownership issues. ] (]) 13:54, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
*'''3rd party comment'''It should be noted that the reporting user ] has behaved very similarly and I have warned them both on this issue. Also that there is an ongoing discussion at ] attempting to resolve the issues these two users have. <s>At this stage I think a ] may suffice as both have made some atempt to reach a consensus on the understanding that they re each on a last warning</s> - ] ].] 14:03, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
::You know what. I'm done editing the ]. I created the page though, but because you won the case on the edit warring. I decided to move it to the sandbox. You create the page instead, and put the necessary contents. ] (]) 14:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
*FFS. Can which every admin deals with this please ensure that the article is moved back from ] to it's proper place. I retract my previous comment on trouting, this has gone too far. Thanks - ] ].] 14:10, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
::Yes, Basement12. We'll bring the contents back if someone besides myself should re-create the article. ] (]) 14:13, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
:::I've already moved the page back, even without addressing the rest of the case. —''']''' (]) 14:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
::::Unfortunately, it's too late. The page has been deleted. ] (]) 14:20, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
:::::This is getting out of hand, ] has gotten the page deleted, and has now recreated it and restored it to their preferred version (which is against the MOS, and discussion!). When will this stop. There is only so much one editor can do (before it is considered edit warring, and believe me this is not the end goal. ] (]) 14:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
::::::Why can't you create the article instead, and see if you can prove that it follows the MOS guidelines? ] (]) 14:47, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
:::::::Looks like a case for ] to me. Sportsfan was not 1 little bit better with his behavoiour. ] (]) 19:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
::::::::] continues to edit against discussion on other pages as well and threatening to delete them! "Inconsistent with other sports; If you keep reverting my edits, I'll delete the page right now." ] (]) 03:39, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

==] reported by ] (Result: )==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Barbara_Turner_(screenwriter)}} <br/>
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|BrillLyle}}

<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. -->

Previous version reverted to:

<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. -->
Diffs of the user's reverts:
#
#
#

<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary -->
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. -->
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too -->
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Edit summaries only -- issue is of harassment by ] (see below)

<u>Comments:</u> <br/>
] has been reverting my edits, patronizingly dismissing them and refusing to indicate what exactly was the problem and/or to rectify anything in particular with which he took issue. Instead he simply reverted my edits three times before ] tolled. On my talk page (see ), he left this ancient which has nothing to do with anything in recent memory just to try to viciously embarrass me by scavenging through my past. I made mistakes, I served my time, and that's it. I could have changed my username but I haven't. ] 18:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

: I'm actually quite confused here. This person is a known edit warring sockpuppetter and difficult editor. He said he had discussed the edits he made but there was no Talk page discussions on the page in question or on my Talk page. And when I wrote on his Talk page he deleted the section -- which I have never even seen before. My issue was that I have had pages that I have worked very hard on changed by this editor in the past and he has behaved in a very uncivil way. This experience is the same. I question why the edits were made, especially as there is no value add, the dates on the entire page are consistent, and he added little to no content. Why does he get to behave this way? I can walk away from the pages he works on after I do but it seems patently unfair. To be called out for this here is also not ideal. I had thought to report his editing as being disruptive and against good will principles here but thought I would give him the benefit of the doubt and not follow through. Now I regret that. This whole issue is pointless. I will just walk away. But this editor is a problem. He drives away editors and doesn't add content. It's all sort of a nightmare. Erika aka ] (]) 18:53, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

:: ''" He said he had discussed the edits he made but there was no Talk page discussions on the page in question or on my Talk page"'' -- NO. I said I had communicated via edit summary just as ] did. It's 2016, and ] should really forget about things that happened on Misplaced Pages up to and more than a decade ago and concentrate on the present. Since being restored to editing privileges a decade or so ago (can't exactly remember what year, it's that long ago) I have not been blocked once. I do the best I can and have the commendations to prove it, on my talk page in my archives. ] 19:03, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

::: Whatever fantasy you want to believe. I am walking away from this page -- a page I improved significantly -- because of your behavior. Do you have any ability to examine your own behavior here as being unpleasant? I don't care how many gold stars you get, it's a lump of coal from me. ] (]) 19:09, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: Sock blocked) ==

;Page: {{pagelinks|Lionel Messi}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|Pennyerrs}}

;Previous version reverted to:

;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|717907224|12:46, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} "/* Early life */Yeah, how do you know that, Im not and you cant prove it."
# {{diff2|717905767|12:34, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} "/* Early life */Only Marche, I added Porto Recanati, the town where his ancestor came from."
# {{diff2|717905043|12:27, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} "/* Early life */"
# {{diff|oldid=716777870|diff=717880621|label=Consecutive edits made from 08:09, 30 April 2016 (UTC) to 08:10, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}}
## {{diff2|717880544|08:09, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} "/* Honours and achievements */"
## {{diff2|717880621|08:10, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} "/* Trivia */"

;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|717908536|12:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} "Final warning: Vandalism on ]. using ]"
* Pennyerrs {{confirmed}} and indefinitely blocked.--] (]) 13:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 3 days) ==

'''Page:'''
:{{pagelinks|2016–17 United States network television schedule}} <br />
'''User being reported:'''
:{{userlinks|AdamDeanHall}}

'''Previous version reverted to:'''


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' '''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# {{diff2|1265161751|12:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} ""
#
# {{diff2|1265079289|00:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} ""
#
# {{diff2|1265038799|19:39, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} ""
#
# {{diff2|1264974672|12:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} ""
#
#
#
#
#
#

'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
#
#
<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too -->
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
#
#
<u>Comments:</u> <br />

<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ -->
*{{AN3|b|3 days}} <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">&mdash; ] // ] // ] // </small> 10:45, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 48 hours, with warning) ==

;Page: {{pagelinks|Water fluoridation controversy}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|Bigbaby23}}

;Previous version reverted to:

;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|717939120|16:18, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 717935580 by ] (]) Why don't you explain your objection in the talk page? My edit is in response to the request in the section "The lede is a mess""
# {{diff2|717935469|15:59, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} "/* Ethics */ re-added material that got "lost" in editing/reverting"
# {{diff2|717857492|04:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} "revert yobol lede edit. Nuffield has weight .I will elaborate in talk page"
# {{diff2|717844819|02:02, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} "/* Ethics */ ] is a report done by many expert in an authoritative organization. needs to have its due weight. (whether you like their conclusions or not)"

;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:


;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

See talk page of article
;<u>Comments:</u>

Numerous 3RR warnings on their talk page. Not even more reverts prior to this that do not fit within the past 24 hours. ] (]) 16:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
:{{AN3|blocked| 48 hours}} by Anna Frodesiak with a warning that future instances will result in an extended block. <span style="font-family: Palatino;"> ] • ]</span> 17:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: Semi) ==

;Page: {{pagelinks|April 3}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|86.154.101.95}}

;Previous version reverted to:

;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|717940272|16:25, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} "As requested by Rms125a, removed references and changed link to point reader towards those scholarly references. Rms125a please answer on Talk Page what you mean by "speculation" - your link below is dysfunctional."
# {{diff2|717917716|14:11, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} "Removed external link as requested by Rms125a@hotmail.com. Hope everyone is satisfied now."
# {{diff2|717890604|10:00, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} "It is not one writer, but a scholarly survey of 100 (one hundred) writers. Read the reference."

;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|717959136|18:43, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} "Caution: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on ]. (])"

;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


;<u>Comments:</u>

Two warnings given. ]&#160;] 18:46, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi there. Amccann421 accuses me of edit-warring, saying "Please do not add or change content, as you did at ], without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article."

However the other editors have pointed out today to me that in fact it is NOT permitted to cite references/sources in ] or in any other Date-of-Year pages. Hence I removed my references. Unfortunately, now Amccann421 has appeared on the scene and is criticising me for removing the refs and accusing me of edit warring. Please confirm, on the ] Talk page, that you have got it wrong. And please do not further disrupt the discussion and editing process unless you have a valid point to make. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 20:14, 30 April 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:'''Result:''' Semiprotected two months. Revert warring by IPs who don't wait for consensus on the talk page. A fluctuating IP from 86.254.* is being reverted by multiple others, so this needs a discussion. Some editors argue that any Biblical chronology that is speculative needs to have evidence presented in a separate article on the topic, not in the date-of-the-year article itself. ] (]) 22:24, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==

;Page: {{pagelinks|Joseph Gordon-Levitt}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|Violetnese}}

;Previous version reverted to:

;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|717993855|22:52, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 717993658 by ] (]) Don't listen to him, I am them, there are too many Idols."
# {{diff2|717989554|22:19, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 717987271 by ] (]) Come on, keep this one. Rumors/gossip not this!"
# {{diff2|717986807|21:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 717982508 by ] (])"
# <s>{{diff2|717981909|21:21, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} "He is known for his falsetto!"</s> Not a revert.

;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
* they warn an administrator about edit warring, suggesting they're well-aware of the penalties. Bbb23 with a warning, though (I assume) on the wrong user talk page. ]<sub>(])</sub> 22:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
:*{{reply|Clpo13}} When I post to {{U|Drmies}}'s Talk page it is '''never''' a warning, except when it's about the unhealthy effects of eating bacon while watching college football.{{smiley}} --] (]) 23:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
::*{{U|Bbb23}}, you know I greatly appreciate your words of advice and encouragement. Roll Tide, my friend. ] (]) 21:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


;<u>Comments:</u>

Despite warnings about adding unsupported comments, this user has edit warred with two editors about Gordon-Levitt being a falsetto and/or countertenor. ]<sub>(])</sub> 22:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

: I'm following https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:RecentChangesLinked/Category:Falsettos right now, don't take him off. ]</font>] 23:05, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
::I know this board is about conduct, not content, but I can't resist. First, you can be a bass and sing in falsetto. Second, having a "high" tenor voice does not mean you're singing in falsetto. Third - and I'm not sure where countertenor came from in this silliness - a countertenor is not the same as a man singing in falsetto. Fourth, regardless of anything else, how on earth did this editor determine that this piece of trivia belongs in the lead? Frankly, ] is more applicable here than edit-warring (fwiw, she didn't breach 3RR).--] (]) 23:25, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
:::Ooh, you're right. I assumed was a revert from the edit summary. ]<sub>(])</sub> 23:29, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
::::That's right. http://www.instagram.com/ryanjkirkland. ]</font>] 23:31, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
"Look what Ryan just saw on Misplaced Pages! They can't take it off!" Ryan didn't get a response from https://www.instagram.com/p/6kZl_BkSRA. ]</font>] 23:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

You're right, but me, I only saw/want the falsetto/Anthony Green meets Adam Levine from Maroon 5 one! ]</font>] 00:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

*'''Comment''': This is not only an edit war, it's a BLP-vio and also borderline vandalism. Not sure what this editor's deal is, but they've gotten three warnings for vandalism/disruptive editing in the past 6.5 weeks. ] (]) 07:54, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
**I just want to know what the deal is with the Instagram links. ]<sub>(])</sub> 19:41, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|User talk:70.124.133.228}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|3primetime3}}

<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. -->

Previous version reverted to:

<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. -->
Diffs of the user's reverts:
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning #1: (the user being reported made 9 reversions after this warning)<br>
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning #2: (the user being reported made 5 reversions after this warning)

After this report was first posted and the user was notified, the user continued reverting my talk page:
#
#
#
#
#
#
#

] (]) 01:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
* {{AN3|c}} Report is for the reversion of warnings on the IP's talk page. While his edits ''were'' in violation of ], our conversation on my talk page ] seems to show that he didn't know that users are allowed to remove warnings from their own talk pages. He understands this now, and hasn't made further reversions. I recommend siding with ] and perhaps giving him a reminder about 3RR and talk page guidelines as opposed to blocking. ]<sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 01:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
::He has stopped, which is a good outcome. --] (]) 02:06, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: Protected) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Timothy Leary}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|2605:A000:1200:4020:BDC2:282A:6C52:766B}}

<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. -->

Previous version reverted to:

<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. -->
Diffs of the user's reverts:
#
#
#
#

<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary -->
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. -->
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: (can't give diff as edit created page)

<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too -->
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

<u>Comments:</u> <br />

<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ -->
IP editor is reverting several changes:
* Keeps restoring category "Philosophers of mind" despite consensus against it.
* Keeps changing "stand-up philosopher" (sourced) to "performing philosopher" (unsourced)
* Keeps reverting implementation of RfC consensus.
] (]) 04:05, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
:I second this. The IP has been disruptive in numerous different ways. It has repeatedly made edits without explanations or edit summaries, most recently . This is behavior which unfortunately suggests an absence of interest in discussing issues or reaching consensus. ] (]) 04:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
What an enormous amount of hypocrisy and ignorance.] (]) 04:32, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

:Skyrise appears to misstate several facts. There is no clear consensus on the philosophers of mind category. Rather, he and FKC have insisted on their position and several others have disagreed but tired of the ]. I personally think Leary does belong in this category but concede I have not yet found a source that states it clearly in one sentence. Re: the stand-up versus performing philosopher description, the editor that the IP reverted was me. But having searched for new sources, e.g., , I think he's right: Leary ''did'' call himself a "performing philosopher", not a "stand-up philoopher", the latter term apparently having been applied to him by others; this is why I didn't revert back. Re: the RfC "consensus", I concede the !votes to exclude outnumber those to include but the RfC has not been closed and proper procedure is for an uninvolved editor to do that. Skyrise announced he intended to close his own RfC. When informed this was completely inappropriate , his response was to insult all those who disagree with him as "uninformed", a clear and unambiguous personal attack. ] (]) 05:00, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
::If there actually were an acceptable source calling Leary a philosopher of mind, such as a respected work of reference dealing with philosophy, I would probably not have any objection to the "philosophers of mind" category either. That does not alter the fact that there is no such source. You the category yourself at one stage, with the edit summary "rm Category:Philosophers of mind per talk page", and that does count toward consensus for keeping it out at least for now. ] (]) 05:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
:::As we all know, 3RR has nothing to do with the ''content'' and only to do with a ''count of reverts''. The IP has crossed the bright line. I only listed the most recent four. Others could be added. ] (]) 05:41, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
* {{AN3|pe}} Protected by KrakatoaKatie. ]]<font color="#0645AD"></font> (]) 06:51, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==

;Page: {{pagelinks|Mahdi Al Tajir}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|Robertx123}}

;Previous version reverted to:

;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|718080898|12:05, 1 May 2016 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 718073836 by ] (])"
# {{diff2|718060900|09:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)}} "/* Life */"
# {{diff2|717975744|20:35, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 717709333 by ] (])"

;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|718081054|12:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC)}} "General note: Unconstructive editing on ]. (])"
# {{diff2|718081253|12:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)}} "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule. (])"

;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


;<u>Comments:</u>

== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 24 hours) ==

;Page: {{pagelinks|Multi-factor authentication}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|120.151.160.158}}

;Previous version reverted to:

;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|718094832|14:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)}} "Added variety of reliable references"
# {{diff2|718089186|13:19, 1 May 2016 (UTC)}} "Move this warring to the article talk page please. This source is absolutely acceptable according to wikipedia rules. Undid revision 718088582 by ] (])"
# {{diff2|718088026|13:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)}} "Some news outlets host interactive columns they call "blogs", and these may be acceptable as sources if the writers are professional journalists or professionals in the field on which they write ... Bruce is both."
# {{diff2|718087701|13:05, 1 May 2016 (UTC)}} "Visit your talk page to mediate this instead of warring please. If you do not know Bruce, you should not be editing this page in the first place. Here's 260+ wiki other articles accepting him as reliable: site:https://en.wikipedia.org/ "Schneier, Bruce""
# {{diff2|718019084|02:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)}} "Industries most widely accepted expert in this field is the most reliable source possible. Refer https://en.wikipedia.org/Bruce_Schneier or his dozen+ books. Do not revert without again without citation to back up your opinion."
# {{diff2|717897609|11:18, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} "user offered their opinion, without any references as justification, for removing the reference to this industries most widely respected expert in this matter. multi-factor is not stopping breakins - pick up any IT newspaper."
# {{diff2|717897191|11:14, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} "reference effectiveness"

;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:120.151.160.158&diff=718088083&oldid=718087902

;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
# ]

;<u>Comments:</u>

Discussion is ongoing on the talk page, but the IP continues to edit war about this adjective in the opening sentence. ] (]) 14:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

: I was asked to provide different sources. I did. Why are you calling this a war, and blaming me for it? <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 14:25, 1 May 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:: Misplaced Pages uses the term "edit war" to refer to editors repeatedly overriding one another's edits. It's explained at ]. --] (]) 14:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
*{{AN3|b|24 hours}} IP was warned repeatedly and persisted. <span style="color: #9932CC">]<sup>]</sup></span> 14:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|UFC 200}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Greg440}}

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:
-First wave of reverts:
#
#
#

-Second wave of reverts:
#
#
#

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: Same as below
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

<u>Comments:</u> <br />The user keeps reverting edits as it was shown above. I approached him via edit summary and his talk page, but he was never open to communication. He had one argument at the beginning, backed by no source. When I kept pressuring him regarding his methods, he started deviating the conversation including what someone might see as xenophobia, as he argued that I don't understand stuff because English is not my first language and I should edit the Portuguese version of the Misplaced Pages, even though I have almost three years of experience with such articles. I even adjusted the article to a version that appeals to the similarity of other articles and is still correct, with sources to back it up. The funny thing is that even this user had a identical edit earlier as shown in the second link at the top of this report. Now he's just reverting the page, nothing else to argue from his part. I'd like to report this to avoid a bigger edit war. I've restrained myself from entering this thing and even waited a day to perform a different edit to try to resolve this issue, yet he keeps edit warring and flinging with the 3RR. I do not come here with the intention of seeing him blocked whatsoever. I just wanted to have administrators telling him how this is supposed to work. Specially because he says we have to be "professionals" here. He lost himself with that word and ends up contradicting exactly what he mentioned early in our discussion at this talk page. Thanks. ] (]) 19:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|UFC 200}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Gsfelipe94}}

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of my reverts:
-First wave of reverts:
#
#
#

-Second wave of reverts:
#
#
#

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: Same as below
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

<u>Comments:</u> <br />User keeps reverting my edits, starts personally insulting and insinuating me by calling me "xenophobic" over Misplaced Pages editing. User fails to acknowledge other articles that use proper lingo and instead has decided to throw a tantrum. Users first language isn't English and fails to recognize examples I've provided. Claims I'm edit warring when it takes more than one for there to be a war. After the first initial edit reversions he then proceeded to decide the term we were arguing over and how it should be presented wasn't even valid just to further complicate the situation and prolong the back and forth.] (]) 20:03, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
:I believe what I've said earlier here and in your talk page can speak for myself. Totally opposite to everything you mentioned here. You even copied my entire report... I'll refrain from further commentary on this section. ] (]) 20:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
::Totally opposite of everything I mentioned here? Everything I just stated was entirely factual. There's zero room for interpretation. ] (]) 20:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked) ==

;Page: {{pagelinks|Anti-Arabism}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|Patrick1425}}

;Previous version reverted to:

;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|718166612|22:35, 1 May 2016‎ (UTC)}} "/* United States */"
# {{diff2|718165437|22:27, 1 May 2016‎ (UTC)}} "/* United States */"
# {{diff|oldid=718158350|diff=718164083|label=Consecutive edits made from 22:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC) to 22:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)}}
## {{diff2|718163665|22:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)}} "/* United States */"
## {{diff2|718163869|22:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)}} "/* United States */"
## {{diff2|718164083|22:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)}} "/* United States */"
# {{diff|oldid=718156245|diff=718157113|label=Consecutive edits made from 21:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC) to 21:24, 1 May 2016 (UTC)}}
## {{diff2|718156733|21:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)}} "/* United States */"
## {{diff2|718156888|21:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC)}} "/* United States */"
## {{diff2|718157113|21:24, 1 May 2016 (UTC)}} "/* United States */"
# {{diff|oldid=717847294|diff=718155833|label=Consecutive edits made from 20:51, 1 May 2016 (UTC) to 21:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)}}
## {{diff2|718152599|20:51, 1 May 2016 (UTC)}} "definition of Arab https://en.wikipedia.org/Arabs"
## {{diff2|718155833|21:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)}} "/* United States */ media reports of the 2015 Chattanooga shooting"
# {{diff|oldid=717835310|diff=717843618|label=Consecutive edits made from 01:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC) to 01:50, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}}
## {{diff2|717842910|01:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} "/* United States */ 2015 Chattanooga shootings prompted further expressions of anti Arabism in the media"
## {{diff2|717843265|01:46, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} "Definition of Arab is a person whose native language is Arabic."
## {{diff2|717843618|01:50, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} "/* United States */"
# {{diff2|717833332|00:21, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} "/* United States */ references to media reporting of the 2015 Chattanooga shooting and anti Arabism"
# {{diff2|717827783|23:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)}} "/* United States */"
# {{diff2|717825920|23:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)}} "references to Arab American Mohammad Youssuf Abdulazziz in Chattanooga. His murder of five U.S. service members on July 16, 2015, generated media reporting."

;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|718158556|21:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)}} "Warning: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on ]. (])"
# {{diff2|718158643|21:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)}} "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on ]. (])"

;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


;<u>Comments:</u>

User has repeatedly tried to add the Chatanooga, TN shootings to the article, despite being reverted by myself, {{U|Srich32977}}, {{U|24.57.54.196}}, and {{U|Grayfell}}. This is the same material added by IP editors previously (e.g., see by {{U|IronGargoyle}}). The material being added is COATRACK and OR (none of the sources given even mention the word "Arab" let alone "Anti-Arabism" or any synonym). This is long-term edit warring with block evasion (see {{user links|98.204.183.125}}). ] ] <small>Please &#123;&#123;]&#125;&#125;</small> 22:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
:PS - please ping me in any replies. Thank you. ] ] <small>Please &#123;&#123;]&#125;&#125;</small> 22:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
{{ping|EvergreenFir}} I started a SPI a while ago (]) for what it's worth. ] (]) 23:46, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
:{{AN3|b}} – 48 hours. ] (]) 00:14, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==

;Page: {{pagelinks|Durand Line}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|Haqiqat510}}

;Previous version reverted to:
#

;Diffs of the user's reverts:
#
#
#
#
#


;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning: '''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
# {{diff2|1265079184|00:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring."
#
# {{diff2|1265080757|00:31, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule."
#
#
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
# {{diff2|1265080353|00:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} "/* ChasePlowman2014 edit warring */ new section"


;<u>Comments:</u> <u>'''Comments:'''</u>


This user is engaged in edit warring. ] (]) 22:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC) User continues edit warring and doesn't discuss edits even after having been requested to, not even explaining their reversions in their edit summary. ] (]) 13:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
:{{u|ChasePlowman2014}} is completely unresponsive. I hope they try editing during the 2 weeks of their block and notice that they have a talk page. ] (]) 16:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
*{{AN3|b|2 weeks}} ] (]) 16:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
**Whilst I cannot dispute ChasePlowman2014's behaviour for edit warring, Happily888 is not completely without fault here. Neither user made any particular effort to engage in discussion over a relatively minor issue, but to expect an immediate response (and then immediately banning said user) on the 25th of December, a day of the year when one can reasonably be expected to be a little busy, is overzealous. I have also left a response to Happily888's message on the ] explaining why ChasePlowman2014 was, arguably, correct to make the initial edit before Happily888 made the first reversion. -- ] <small>(] &#124; ])</small> 21:36, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:36, 25 December 2024

Noticeboard for edit warring

Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles and content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard Shortcuts Update this page

    This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

    You must notify any user you have reported.

    You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    Additional notes
    • When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
    • The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
    • Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
    • Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.
    Definition of edit warring
    Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
    Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)
    An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.

    Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

    Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.

    Click here to create a new report

    Noticeboard archives
    Administrators' (archives, search)
    348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357
    358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367
    Incidents (archives, search)
    1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164
    1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174
    Edit-warring/3RR (archives, search)
    471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480
    481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490
    Arbitration enforcement (archives)
    327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336
    337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346
    Other links

    User:PaleoFile reported by User:Bowler the Carmine (Result: Warned users)

    Page: Giganotosaurus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: PaleoFile (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:



    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: (regarding another now-dormant edit war on a related page)

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: N/A, did not revert and talked directly to editor instead

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

    Bowler the Carmine | talk 20:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

    User:Napoleonjosephine2020 reported by User:Kline (Result: Blocked 24 hours)

    Page: Lindy Li (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Napoleonjosephine2020 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:



    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Zilch.

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

    Comments:

    Note: I am not involved in this situation whatsoever, just found this in recent changes. Kline • talk • contribs 05:16, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

    The editor whose revisions I am trying to undo publicly attacked the subject as an "opportunistic grifter". No one who uses such inflammatory language should be editing the page of this subject. This is common sense and journalism 101. He is clearly motivated by animus against her and should not be editing her page. Why is this even in question? Napoleonjosephine2020 (talk) 05:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
    @Napoleonjosephine2020
    "This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule." Also, "When reporting a user here, own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first." I am not involved, don't complain to me please. Nothing I can do here. Kline • talk • contribs 05:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
    You reported me because I tried to stop someone from violating Li's page! Why is the saboteur getting a free pass? He's clearly motivated by animus and admitted as much on her talk page. Napoleonjosephine2020 (talk) 05:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
    Did you read my comment? You and the other person will have behavior analyzed and decisions will be made accordingly. I'm not singling you out since I have no idea what's happening, you just happened to start the edit war. Kline • talk • contribs 05:28, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
    Napoleon, I think this is a manifestly unfair characterization of what occurred on my talk page (not yours). Here’s the exchange, for those curious. EncycloDeterminate (talk) 05:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

    User:2601:40:CE00:1590:24F6:A73A:9F20:74C and User:2601:40:CE00:1590:80BC:3313:5A8D:AACE reported by User:Bowler the Carmine (Result: Page already protected)

    Page: Warburg effect (oncology) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: 2601:40:CE00:1590:24F6:A73A:9F20:74C (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and 2601:40:CE00:1590:80BC:3313:5A8D:AACE (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    4. (second IP)



    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: N/A, did not participate in reverts. Warned first IP on their own talk page

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

    Comments:
    I believe both IPs are the same person. The second IP's first edit is a talk page comment stating I'm not Ravidmurthy, but I am the one who has been doing most of the editing here., and after leaving that and another comment proceeded to make the same reversion (#4 above) as the other IP, a little more than 2 hours after #3. CipherRephic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) was also involved in the edit war, but agreed to stop after being warned and has not broken 3RR. Bowler the Carmine | talk 21:12, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

    User:99.98.190.59 reported by User:ZimZalaBim (Result: Blocked 2 weeks)

    Page: Marc Benioff (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: 99.98.190.59 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 18:21, 24 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265024592 by ZimZalaBim (talk)"
    2. 16:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1264902249 by Augmented Seventh (talk)"
    3. 03:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1264868382 by ZimZalaBim (talk)"
    4. 23:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1264776552 by Zachomatic (talk)"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 18:05, 24 December 2024 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing on Marc Benioff."
    2. 18:58, 24 December 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    1. 18:07, 24 December 2024 (UTC) "/* Early life/ethnic background */ more"

    Comments:

    User:ChasePlowman2014 reported by User:Happily888 (Result: Blocked 2 weeks)

    Page: Dune: Part Two (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: ChasePlowman2014 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 12:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC) ""
    2. 00:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC) ""
    3. 19:39, 24 December 2024 (UTC) ""
    4. 12:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC) ""

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 00:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring."
    2. 00:31, 25 December 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    1. 00:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC) "/* ChasePlowman2014 edit warring */ new section"

    Comments:

    User continues edit warring and doesn't discuss edits even after having been requested to, not even explaining their reversions in their edit summary. Happily888 (talk) 13:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

    ChasePlowman2014 is completely unresponsive. I hope they try editing during the 2 weeks of their block and notice that they have a talk page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
    • Blocked – for a period of 2 weeks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
      • Whilst I cannot dispute ChasePlowman2014's behaviour for edit warring, Happily888 is not completely without fault here. Neither user made any particular effort to engage in discussion over a relatively minor issue, but to expect an immediate response (and then immediately banning said user) on the 25th of December, a day of the year when one can reasonably be expected to be a little busy, is overzealous. I have also left a response to Happily888's message on the Dune: Part Two talk page explaining why ChasePlowman2014 was, arguably, correct to make the initial edit before Happily888 made the first reversion. -- JascaDucato (talk | contributions) 21:36, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
    Categories: