Misplaced Pages

Talk:Jimmy Wales: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:53, 25 August 2006 edit68.121.151.244 (talk) Accountability: warning from an attorney to Jimmy Wales← Previous edit Latest revision as of 06:07, 15 January 2025 edit undoFlightTime (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors157,682 edits Newer 2024 image?: Current 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header|search=yes}}
{| class="toccolours"
{{Article history
|-
| action1 = AFD
| width="80%" valign="top" |
| action1date = 14 October 2005
'''If you need to contact Jimbo about something, please do so at ], not here.''' As Jimbo himself explains...
| action1link = Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales
| action1result = kept
| action1oldid = 14579563


| action2 = AFD
People who are trying to leave messages for me will likely be more satisfied if they leave messages on my ] than if they leave them here. This is the talk page for the article about me, not a place to talk to me. I rarely read this. --] 06:05, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
| action2date = 14 August 2007
{{High-traffic|date=August 11, 2006|url=http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200609/wikipedia|site=Atlantic Monthly}}
| action2link = Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales (2nd nomination)
{{talkheader}}
| action2result = speedily kept
{{WPBiography|class=GA|importance=Mid|living=yes}}
| action2oldid = 151188864
{{Notable Wikipedian|Jimbo Wales|Wales, Jimbo}}
{{oldpeerreview}}
{{Talk Spoken Misplaced Pages|Jimmy_Wales.ogg}}
{{bounty notice|Xoloz|$20}}
{{bounty notice|Bottesini|$15}}
{{GA-biz people}}


| action3 = AFD
| width="20%" valign="top" |
| action3date = 31 August 2007
<center>]<br/>]</center>
| action3link = Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales (3rd nomination)
----
| action3result = speedily kept
# ]
| action3oldid = 154846896
# ]
----
__TOC__
|}
== An important question... ==


| action4 = GAN
Why does the article not even bother to mention Jimbo's birth date?--] <sup>]</sup> 06:35, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
| action4date = 25 March 2012
:Because there is no good source for it, see discussion above. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 08:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
| action4link = Talk:Jimmy Wales/GA1
| action4result = failed
| action4oldid = 477279005


|action5 = AFD
:Look up three entries. --] - '']'' - ] 10:45, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
|action5date = 14:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
:: I know the birthdate has been June 1966, 6 August 1966, and 8 August 1966 - however, I believe there are now sufficient references for 7 August 1966. While some of these may have gotten their information from an old version of this article, I believe the conferences mostly got their information independently and are reliable sources. --<font color="#06C">]</font> 04:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
|action5link = Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales (8th nomination)
|action5result = speedily kept
|action5oldid = 758452878


|currentstatus = FGAN
::: Can't we just ask Jimmy? ] 06:17, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
|topic = Social sciences and society
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes |collapsed=yes |class=B |vital=yes |listas=Wales, Jimmy |1=
{{WikiProject Misplaced Pages|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Internet culture|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Chicago|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Computing|importance=Mid |websites=yes |websites-importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Finance & Investment|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Business|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low |IN=yes |IN-importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Alabama}}
{{WikiProject Biography}}
{{WikiProject Spoken Misplaced Pages}}
{{WikiProject Objectivism|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Open |importance=High}}
}}
<!-- Inactive Projects -->
<!-- End of Inactive Projects -->
{{Press
| subject = article
| author = Yermi Brenner
| title = Taking On Misplaced Pages's Bias
| org = Medium
| url = https://medium.com/better-humans/11acd4a7f44c
| date = {{date|24 June 2013}}
| quote =
| archiveurl = http://www.webcitation.org/6ITfm2rhu
| archivedate = {{date|28 July 2013}}
| accessdate = {{date|28 July 2013}}
| author2 = Madeleine Spence
| title2 = Larry Sanger: ‘I wouldn’t trust Misplaced Pages — and I helped to invent it’
| org2 = The Sunday Times
| url2 = https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/larry-sanger-i-wouldnt-trust-wikipedia-and-i-helped-to-invent-it-cflrhmdhx
| date2 = {{date|1 August 2021}}
| quote2 =
| archiveurl2 =
| archivedate2 =
| accessdate2 =
| author3 = ]
| title3 = VIPs expect special treatment. At Misplaced Pages, don’t even ask.
| org3 = ]
| url3 = https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/wikipedia-jimmy-wales-john-eastman-editing/2021/10/28/f2d61bea-35fd-11ec-9bc4-86107e7b0ab1_story.html
| date3 = 28 October 2021
| quote3 =
| accessdate3 = 29 October 2021


| author4 = ]
== doesn't look good to me ==
| title4 = Misplaced Pages's Jimmy Wales Has Already Solved the Internet's Problems
| org4 = ]
| url4 = https://reason.com/video/2022/04/28/wikipedias-jimmy-wales-has-already-solved-the-internets-problems/
| date4 = 28 April 2022
| quote4 =
| accessdate4 = 6 May 2022
}}
{{Notable Wikipedian|Jimbo Wales|declared=yes|editedhere=yes}}
{{tmbox|type=content|class=tmbox-talk-notice|text=
<big>This talk page is '''only for discussions concerning Misplaced Pages's article on Jimmy Wales'''.</big>
* '''To talk to Jimmy Wales himself''', please use ''']'''.
* '''To get help with general Misplaced Pages questions''', see the ''']'''.
* '''To discuss Misplaced Pages policy or practices''', see the ''']'''.
* '''For other useful links''', see the ''']'''.}}


{{merged-from|Jimmy Wales Foundation|14 December 2020}}
The page seems all screwed up to me - it starts with a description of "infobox celebrity" with a couple of examples following and the actual text is only a screen or two below. Must be some trivial markup mistake but I wasn't going to try to fix it myself - perhaps there's somebody more competent --] 06:38, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
{{pp-move-indef}}
:OK now it's good. Somebody's been playing with it :) --] 06:58, 3 July 2006 (UTC)


== Archive by copy and paste == {{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=Talk:Jimmy Wales/Archive index
Is there some policy on archiving - as it makes more sense to me to move the talk page rather than copy and paste the text since the history then goes with the archive page. --<font color="#06C">]</font> 03:39, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
|mask=Talk:Jimmy Wales/Archive <#>

|leading_zeros=0
:According to the official policy page, you can do either, as long as you follow the same procedure each time on the same page. --] 08:51, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
|indexhere=no
:: Thx --<font color="#06C">]</font> 14:05, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config
== Jimmy vs. James ==
|archiveheader = {{aan}}

|maxarchivesize = 100K
I think the page should start with Mr. Wales' verifiable name &mdash; that which is on his birth certificate or his current legal name. I expect that such evidence would demonstrate that his name is James, not "Jimmy". If the name "Jimmy" must be presented &mdash; no matter how much he prefers it or even how much it happens to appear in Google &mdash; it should always be in quotes so that the reader does not have to worry about the truth of the matter. I am operating on the assumption that ] best reflects the truth at the moment. -- ] 20:30, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
|counter = 14
: Per ]: ''"the name of an article should be "the most common name of a person or thing that does not conflict with the names of other people or things"''. ]]<sup>(])</sup> 20:38, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
|minthreadsleft = 4
::That is fine for the name of the article. But the standard practice - even for Linda Lovelace, is to put the true legal name of the person in bold print first - no matter how cumbersome it might be. Check out Napolean's entry, for instance. Wait, those are dead people. Check out, uh, ]. Super-long name, all spelled out. As much detail as possible about the true name. And let me acknowledge: many, perahps most, people want to be known by there nickname or informal name because because it is more friendly. We can do that to some degree, but let us report the Ojbective truth first. -- ] 22:12, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
|algo = old(30d)

|archive = Talk:Jimmy Wales/Archive %(counter)d
: I believe Jimmy has stated here in the past that this is indeed his given name, and that this is not uncommon in Alabama. Dig through the archives.--]] 22:26, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
}}

{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
::Thanks El! It is ]. Quote:
|target=/Archive index
:::'' I'm from Alabama. My real name is Jimmy. Strange, perhaps, but true.--] 09:46, 20 October 2005 (UTC)''
|mask=/Archive <#>
::Perhaps it would be best to assure our readers of this strange fact. I chose to juxtapose the two facts but not attempt to develop a cause/effect relationship. I leave that to ], such as in his "Who's Next?". -- ] 22:49, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
|leading_zeros=0

|indexhere=yes}}

__TOC__

== Date/age issue ==




== A fine point about Jimmy's wealth ==

] does not list Illinois or Florida as a commnity property state and Jimmy clearly made his millions while a resident of Illinois. Should the lead section state that Jimmy is wealthy or that both he and his wife are wealthy? I am just looking to made a de facto statement about how much claim Christine has to that pile of dough. Jimmy's income is for the purposes of <s>a DissoMaster</s> child support calculations (no good page on Wikipeida..yet) is probably negligeable so it is not like child support would ever amount to much. What say you all? -- ] 06:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
:Note: DissoMaster™ is a registered trademark of ] ] - and should not be used as a generic term. --<font color="#06C">]</font> 15:28, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
::Uh, Mr. name-with-the-umlaut-in-it, that term sure as heck is used as a generic tern in ''my'' U.S. state because is has a pratical and profound impact on everyday people. You slashing it out only impairs communication but I will find a more appropriate phrase is you continue to ] so. -- ] 16:15, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
::: That hasn't gained prominence in my state as a generic term - and, as an attorney, you should know that in addition to being disrespectful to misuse a trademark - the misuse of a trademark in a publication can subject one to a ] order - ps --] 01:38, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
:I do not have millions of dollars. I do not even have one million dollars.--] 16:27, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

But you're still rich thanks to this gigantic helpful site, so you should feel happy about it Master of Misplaced Pages, or founder of the site, Jimbo Wales. ] 22:34, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

:Anon - we're all rich thanks to this gigantic helpful site. -- ] ] 22:39, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

== Some information about the start ==

Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3AJimmy_Wales&diff=55321582&oldid=55105689, where Jimbo himself explains a bit more:
:''"though he has acknowledged that there was no causal connection between this suggestion and the creation of Misplaced Pages." - no, that isn't what I said. There is a big difference between acknowledging that Larry's mention of wikis to me "actually and directly" led to me installing the first wiki software, and "acknowledging" that there was no causal connection at all between Jeremy's suggestion. Jeremy suggested it first, then my daughter wa born and I was busy with that, and when I got back Larry suggested it, and I set up the wiki. There is more to the story than that, but I am just making light editorial comments today, and have no desire to see this edit linked to as even more original research in the article.''
-- ] <sup>]</sup> 03:36, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

== FloNight is being destructive ==

Would somebody let FloNight know that her mindless revert is not welcome? Sorting out how Misplaced Pages got started is a lot of work and her revert is easy and mindless. -- ] 08:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Again: this is A LOT of work. FloNight: please make changes in a forward fashion by reading, comprehending and THEN carefully modifying and commiting your changes. -- ] 08:21, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

I stongly suspect that this is a banned user (see contributions) ] | ] 09:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Theresa, I do not mean to be disrespectful, but... so what? -- ] 09:45, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Banned users are not allowed to post. Everything they add can be reverted. Now please go away. ] | ] 09:50, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

== Theresa Knott is being much more destructive ==

because she is not just deeply reverting but using her admin privledges to impose her will on the rest of the worldwide Community and supress a very clear and useful version of this article. That will destroy much more of the Community shared trust than anything FloNight ever did. -- ] 09:59, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

It certainly will prevent a banned user from editing the articles in question. That's for sure. Bye Bye. ] | ] 10:03, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Theresa, I have only six additional years of experience and living than you do, but I suspect that your attempts to dust me off will be considerably more than you bargained for. Good luck, my dear. -- ] 10:13, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

:It must really kill you that i have that protect button. ] | ] 10:37, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

== Page should be reverted to version before anon edits ==

The extensive recent anon editing to this page have made it significantly worse than normal, and should be, in my opinion, reverted or anyhow significantly edited. I note the following factual errors, some of which are based on original research:

I am commenting today on . I will not bother commenting on some of the really bad writing, such as "modern computer labs and other technology equipment".

# I have never been a foreign currency speculator.
# My date of birth is not August 8, 1966.
# My father is not retired.
# "Within two years (1994 to 1996) had earned enough to "support himself and his wife for the rest of their lives." - We state as fact something that even Wired Magazine does not state as fact (because, as written, it is not true).
# "he has since then declined to comment about the matter" is false.
# "He is a vocal supporter of David Kelley" is false.

--] 16:25, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

:Not an expert on this subject so I'm not sure I reverted far enough back. Would SOMEONE that is an expert on this topic let me know. (Banned users excluded). --] ] 16:44, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

::How far back did you revert? I was planning to revert back to 2 days ago did you go that far? ] | ] 16:46, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

:::Yes, farther. I went to the 7th, I think. After that there were too many edits that I didn't know about. --] ] 16:53, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

::::I think that everything with IP address 75, 68, or 67 is Morrow. Maybe some other ones too. Not to worry, he will call me or write if I am wrong. ; - ) ] ] 17:01, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

== More complaints ==

# Atlantis was never a moderated mailing list, and I was never the moderator of it. This was a mailing list which was hosted as a courtesy to a friend for a few years, and it was owned and operated by him. If you follow the link to the archive.org page (WP:NOR, not that this rule seems to apply to my article for some unexplained reason!) you will find my name listed as "run by"... this only means that I was the administrator of the mailing list in the technical sense at that time. Not moderator. (I frankly think that the entire mention of both this mailing list and the other one are absurd original research unless and until they are mentioned in a publication!)
#: Removed per ], dead link. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 17:30, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
# It is quite frankly absurd to quote the talk page of the article in the article. WP:NOR. If it is not published in a mainstream publication, it does not belong in Misplaced Pages. Period.
#:Agreed. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 17:22, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
# 3 days ago, my father was not retired. Today, he is still not retired.
#:Removed. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 17:22, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
# Again, the "earned enough to support himself" is contested, and should be written as "According to Wired Magazine" if it is to be included at all.
#:The source is not what I would call a ], so I have removed it. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 02:23, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
# Claiming that "the Misplaced Pages community" considered Larry to be co-founder wildly oversteps the cite, which indicates that perhaps some people thought so.
#:Agreed, was inserted during a bout of edit warring. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 17:22, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
# Wired Magazine and Wired News are entirely separate entities. See the Roger Cadenhead reference.
#:It just should link to the correct name, and also to the actuall website, not to Roger's webpage, and it was a different editor as well. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 02:23, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
--] 14:28, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
:I have done that were easy, and I will look at the others in due time.-- ] <sup>]</sup> 17:22, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
:: I have gone through your comments, and changed them as I think they should be represented. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 02:23, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
:Actually, Wired Magazine and Wired News are entirely separate entities. But that's a very new development you might not have known about. --] 16:42, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
::Fair enough, but my point still stands. :) The Cadenhead story was in Wired News, not Wired Magazine.--] 20:27, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
:::Yes, the difference does matter, particularly at the time of the publication in question. --] 20:50, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

== DOB self references ==

Many references at the web have used previous wikipedia articles to get their information abouyt Jimmy Wales, and it has been copied many times over the internet, often quite literally. This results in a serious circular problem and requires extreem care in which sources are used. As an example, the sentence "Jimmy Donal "Jimbo" Wales (born August 7, 1966)" results in 36 google hits . -- ] <sup>]</sup> 04:19, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

:: I agree we should avoid duplicate phraseology which is why I use didn't use all those and except for the Holland conference and the jp article you edited out - sorry I didn't notice the "-Misplaced Pages" at the end of the bio - the other references do not include this phrase. --<font color="#06C">]</font> 05:01, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
:::I think all of those are copies of some text, be it wikipedia, wikimedia or whatever. A source that I think is reliable is the foundation website, and Jimbo himself added his DOB, and I have changed the cite to "{{cite web |author=Wikimedia Foundation Inc.| title = Board of Trustees | url = http://wikimediafoundation.org/search/?title=Board_of_Trustees&diff=prev&oldid=406 | accessdate =2006-07-15}}". -- ] <sup>]</sup> 16:48, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
:::: While I agree that Jimbo would have no reason to lie - that is original research. Where the press release from the Foundation would not be - even if Jimbo was the source - since they have an interest in making sure the information is correct. Additionally - the same is true for the speaker bios - when I have spoken at conference they made some minimal effort to verify my bio even though my company provided it. I would keep the - or the . --<font color="#06C">]</font> 17:24, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
:::::At ]: ''Information found in self-published books, newspapers, or websites/blogs should never be used, '''unless written by the subject''''', and as such, this counts as a source that can be used as it is written by himself. The press kit can (and has been edited) by others, which has the same problem as this website, that everybody can add what they want. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 18:42, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
:::::: Then I seriously don't understand verifiability - as the same is true about anything that anyone rights - they can add whatever they want. But an employer has access to factual information like a driver's license that can verify a bd, where I can claim I was born years earlier or later should I have motive to do so - and if I self-publish - that can be reported as fact? I would think it would have to be reported as "xx claims he was born xx/xx/xxxx" --<font color="#06C">]</font> 19:04, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
:::::::As far as I understand verifiability is that people should be able to check the facts added to wikipedia using reliable sources. As ] explicite states, ''The threshold for inclusion in Misplaced Pages is thus '''verifiability, not truth'''.'' That leads to the next question, is this source reliable? I think the websites of compagnies are acceptable sources for what they say about themselves (See for example ], where Jimbo himself has been editing recently). The foundation website is equivalent to that (not free to edit by unapproved people), and as such, the information added by Jimmy Wales about Jimmy Wales is a pretty strong source as far as I am concerned. But I might have the interpretation of the policies and guidelines wrong ..... -- ] <sup>]</sup> 03:40, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

::Well given the policy wording 'written by the subject' and the fact that we link to the diff, should we make the author of the source 'Jimmy Wales', rather than 'Wikimedia Foundation inc'? --] 17:25, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
:::Yes, sounds reasobnable. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 17:34, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

== edits by a banned user ==

75.24.215.50 and other similar IPs are being used by ] ]. --] 05:08, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

:And apparently was last here as 67.119.194.1 on 11 July 2006. It might be wise to semiprotect unless someone wants to deal with a new round of Amorrow. --] 05:14, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

::Semiprotection is back on. --] 05:30, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

==Opinion Essay: The Overuse of Anonymity at Misplaced Pages and a Proposal==

Moved to ] per Kim's comment below. Click here:
::''']'''

:Ben, you might want to post this at his user talk page instead: ]. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 19:54, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
::An even better place would be it's own page, for example ] and then tag it with {{tl|essay}} /] 21:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

==The New Yorker Interview==

There's some good stuff that should be included, especially the following section which talks about this article:
"Even Wales has been caught airbrushing his Misplaced Pages entry—eighteen times in the past year. He is particularly sensitive about references to the porn traffic on his Web portal. “Adult content” or “glamour photography” are the terms that he prefers, though, as one user pointed out on the site, they are perhaps not the most precise way to describe lesbian strip-poker threesomes. (In January, Wales agreed to a compromise: “erotic photography.”) " --] 20:39, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

: Um, see "Controversy". -- ] 17:40, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

]

== vandalism and unprotection ==

before the first one - that is much better than I expected when I saw the summary. --<font color="#06C">]</font> 23:32, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

== 40th Birthday ==

So is there going to be a gigantic Wiki-birthday in three days when Jimbo turns 40? ] 04:49, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

I could see one happening, maybe Jimbo will get a present or two for his birthday, can't wait for it. ] 23:44, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

== Photo ==

]

I was at the Stanford talk in May and took a dozen photos. This is the best one. Shortly afterwards, my camera died.

I fully realize this is a pathetic photo, but I like the profile, and the thoughtful expression. All of the photos on commons look like tourist shots or candid someone-at-computer stuff. ] 08:01, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

: I believe we have a formal photographer going around the conference, and taking formal photos of the board. We'll wait until then to make any decisions. -- ] 18:10, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

:: I'm adding in a pic from the photoshoot now. -- ] 18:01, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

== First name ==

Professionally, he is Jimmy. Personally, he is Jimbo. Legally he is James. Why don't we mention his birthname anywhere? -- ] 17:43, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
:I believe his legal name is Jimmy - can't remember where I verified that though. --<font color="#06C">]</font> 22:07, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

== Personal life ==

Trodel deleted "Wales lives in ] with his wife and daughter." This has been in the article forever, and is verifiable, and is the sort of stuff you see in many articles. Why don't we keep it? -- ] 17:45, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Do you have a source?--] 18:11, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

:Well we can certainly prove that you lived there as of July 2005 (see paragraph 'I live in St. Petersburg, Fla. If something big were to happen here, I could go out and write up a report on it and interview some local people, and it should be as credible as any news report because I'm a known, respected person in the community and beyond the community.') ] 08:55, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

::And this site - though its not one that I'm familiar with - reckons that you're married with kids . --] 08:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

::: This site does not appear to be an independent source, and it says only that Jimbo "is based " not lives in - which are different - where one works vs where one lives. So I removed it. Personally, I think that it will be very difficult to get a reliable source for this since unverified information was in the bio for so long and got propogated out on the net - but why waste the time trying to find it - there are plenty of better things to do on the encyclopedia. --<font color="#06C">]</font> 09:18, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

::::Two points - the place of residence is backed up by the other source above, in which Jimbo states unequivocally that he lives in St Petersburg. Secondly, the other webstie gives a date of marriage etc. - has that ever been included in this article. As for why look for it - why look for any little bit of information in any article? Every little helps. --] 09:26, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

== Quote from Encyclopædia Britannica ==

I referenced this quote; however, I think it shows that EB doesn't follow a neutrality standard rather than being a good reference - thus I think it should be removed. --<font color="#06C">]</font> 00:51, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
:How is EB not neutral? On the contrary, it's Misplaced Pages's coverage of Objectivism which tends to be biased, since a disproportionate share of those who edit the related articles are themselves Objectivists, while in the general population they are marginal. It's the same with many fringe groups; most people who are interested enough to write about them are adherents, so you get a systemic bias. ] 01:15, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
::"Russian-born American writer who, in commercially successful novels, presented her philosophy of objectivism, ''essentially reversing the traditional Judeo-Christian ethic.''" I would say that to make that final clause shows bias. It may be the majority view - but there is a minority view that has fit the Judeo-Christian ethic into objectivism. The wikipedia article says: "Objectivism holds: that there is a mind-independent reality; that individuals are in contact with this reality through sensory perception; that they gain knowledge by processing the data of perception using reason or 'non-contradictory identification;' that the proper moral purpose of one's life is the pursuit of one's own happiness or 'rational self-interest;' and that the only social system consistent with such a morality is laissez-faire capitalism." Thus, it describes the philosphy without making a judgment on its effect on the ethic. What does refersing mean - does it mean that objectivism created the "me-generation," are they implying that the Judeo-Christian ethic is not being followed, there are many issues with this phrase. --<font color="#06C">]</font> 10:35, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
:::The essence of Objectivism is that it glorifies selfishness and condemns altruism (the Misplaced Pages article is obfuscating there as it puts the non-controversial things about mind-independent reality and reason first, which is not particularly specific to Objectivism). Christian ethics, on the other hand, say "love thy neighbour as thyself". ] 11:31, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
::::Objectivism is overrepresented online so gets treated more sympathetically than most new philosophical movements. I don't know if it's necessary to get into a big discussion in this article on what it is. Brief mention of ] as an atheistic philosophy of enlightened self-interest would be enough I'd think.--] 07:44, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
::::Margana, it would behoove you not to speak in such a way about things you don't know. — ] ] 08:54, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

== American educator? ==

I do not think that Jimmy qualifies as an American educator? Can we remove that catory? -- ] 14:35, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Agreed --] 18:28, 12 August 2006 (UTC)


There is a date/age issue in the second paragraph of the "Early life and education section". "When he was three, in 1968" cannot be correct if he was born on August 7 or 8, 1966. In 1968 he was either one or two, not three. ] (]) 09:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
== Occupation ==


:That ''Daily Beast'' source says "When he was three, his mother bought a World Book Encyclopedia from a door-to-door salesman..", so no year mentioned. I am unable to open the first source, ''The News Courier'', either original or archived, so can't see what it says. ] (]) 09:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
His occupation is listed as "Chair of the Wikimedia Foundation". Seeing that he doesn't get paid directly for it, it's a really time consuming hobby. Running Wikia is his occupation. I propose "President of ]; President of ]". -- ] 18:09, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
::@] Returning to this, the other source says: "Doris Wales’ husband, Jimmy, wasn’t sure what she was thinking when she bought a World Book Encyclopedia set from a traveling salesman in 1968. Their first-born son, also named Jimmy, was not yet 3." So the cited sources disagree about whether he was 3 or not yet 3. ''''']''''' (]) 05:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)


== Jimbo ==
: Anyone? -- ] 18:42, 24 August 2006 (UTC)


Sure we need to mention he’s username in the intro? Barely any sources mention it, and it isn’t a common name given to him. Cheers. ] (]) 16:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
::I would interpret no response as no objections and ] --] 18:45, 24 August 2006 (UTC)


:Errrm, the article opens with: "{{tq|'''Jimmy Donal Wales''' (born August 7, 1966), also known on Misplaced Pages by the nickname '''Jimbo Wales'''...}}" So that's the 15th word in? ] (]) 16:55, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
== Personal Philosophy ==
::What? That’s my point. It’s in the intro. Yet it’s a username without any real-life importance. (I mean that it’s not notable enough to be mentioned in the intro. It’s not a common name, it’s his username). Jimmy Wales has no special rights! Down with the dictatorship! ] (]) 16:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
:::Sorry, I misunderstood your comment. I think it's been there for quite a long time. And I think it probably makes him more accessible, to editors and readers alike. I also can't imagine anything much less like ]. ] (]) 17:04, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Martinevans123}} Inform yourself better before making bold claims with no factual truth (see: ]). As to Jimbo Wales, you might think I’m a picky asshole, and I might think it myself, and it might be true, but clearly this goes against policies, or more generally the way biographies are written. This is just a guy who created an online encyclopedia, might be this one, who knows? That this guy is also coincidentally a user on Misplaced Pages should not be in the article, and definitely not in the intro. Cheers. ] (]) 17:30, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::What an wonderfully enlightening essay, full of "factual truth". Thank you so much for sharing that. And yes, what an amazing coincidence that is - an inventor occasionally using his own invention. Who knows, maybe that nice ] will be using ] before too long? ] (]) 17:42, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::: {{ping|Martinevans123}} This biography is like any other. The username Jimbo Wales, is not a common way of calling him, and is not described ''enough'' in the sources to be notable. ] (]) 17:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::And this is an article Talk page, like any other. So, as per ], we need to arrive at a consensus to remove that detail, instead of just edit warring? ] (]) 17:53, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::::{{ping|Martinevans123}} Sorry. Then let’s discuss. Taking aside what I said before, I did genuinely want to discuss if his username, which is not really notable in any way, should be mentioned in his article. Considering that, yes, genuinely, this article is nothing special, and if Elon Musk was editing Misplaced Pages, his account would not be mentioned. In other words, stating that he edits Misplaced Pages under Jimbo Wales, provided there is a source, can be added, but having Jimbo Wales in the intro just seems a little bizarre. He is not commonly referred to as such, and the ] has nothing to do at the very top of an article. He is not commonly referred to as such, only in Misplaced Pages, and only by those who know he is there. ] (]) 18:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::Experience shows that no good comes from new editors popping in here and poking the bear. I know it's terribly unfair that Jimbo gets special treatment just because he founded Misplaced Pages but most of us have learned to live with it. See ] and ] for why rules that generally apply are not always applied if there is a good reason to do otherwise. ] (]) 00:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::{{ping|Johnuniq}} I get it. Again, sorry if it seemed that way. What I find frustrating is that what I said on my first message was serious, I genuinely want to discuss if we need to put his username in the Intro. It legitimately feels bizarre. It’s not a common name by which he is called, I also know that Misplaced Pages "rules" are just recommendations, and I also do not care that much about this intro. Cheers. ] (]) 01:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::]… This sums it up perfectly. I am legitimately asking if we can keep a not commonly known ''username'' of an online encyclopedia, as an alt/name of Jimmy Wales, in addition to making it sound professional by writing "is known on Misplaced Pages", instead of "known on Misplaced Pages by his username". And in fact, it makes this article a lot less professional, seriously, I’m not kidding. Cheers. ] (]) 01:24, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::, took about 20 seconds to find this one. ] (]) 01:58, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::Ok. I better shut up now shouldn’t I? Cheers, and happy new year. ] (]) 02:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::::<small>Looking forward to Twitterpedia. Now that might well be a ]? But at least we'd get updates . ] (]) 10:14, 3 January 2024 (UTC) </small>
For the next time this comes up, {{user|Encyclopédisme}} was CU indeffed and globally locked on 27 June 2024. ] (]) 00:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)


== Hatnote ==
I'm again removing the Encyclopedia Britannica reference and characterization of objectivism. It's not the source, it's the characterization that is problematic. To distill an entire EB article down to those few words -- "essentially reversing the traditional Judeo-Christian ethic" -- is in and of itself a POV addition to the article. People can decide on their own what the essential nature of objectivism is, including by following the link to the Misplaced Pages article.


{{u|JLCop}} recently removed the hatnote. I reinstated it for now but I do think this subject is worth discussing, given that projectspace links within mainspace are generally discouraged. I noticed that ] also has a similar hatnote but that this is not the case for the average person listed at ]. Thoughts? ] ] 03:44, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Thanks, ]<font color="chartreuse">|</font>] 12:09, 17 August 2006 (UTC)<br>
''(crossposted to ])''
:No, Objectivism is not known to most people so a short explanation should be in this article. Also, the Misplaced Pages article is, as I explained above, subject to systemic bias. The EB is much more objective, and the particular quote is not out of context. It is precisely the definition the EB gives of the essence of Objectivism, and EB is a reliable source. ] 12:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC)


:Delete. ] (]) 00:16, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Margana, the entire "personal philosophy and motivations" is an obvious attempt by you to make Jimbo look bad. On Misplaced Pages we take biographies of living persons pretty damn seriously, and while I don't see Jimbo suing us for libel, we need to apply the standards fairly. Your intentions here are transparently obvious enough—if you revert again, you *will* be blocked. — ] ] 18:25, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
*] which doesn't seem to have been closed or concluded (first item on the page). ] (]) 13:04, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
:My intention is to bring all verifiable facts on the table and leave the reader to interpret them. If the facts make Jimbo look bad, it's Jimbo's problem. If in your view there's nothing bad here, why do you resist putting the facts up? It is obviously your intention to deflect any ''possibility'' of Jimbo looking bad, but we don't use a "sympathetic point of view" here. We have plenty of biographies of living persons which make people look bad, simply through a neutral presentation of the facts. Please review the blocking policy in order to avoid your threatened violation of the same. ] 21:05, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
* I removed this before seeing this discussion. This is a clear case of ], as the edit notice itself says. I also removed the hatnote from ], for the same reason. ] ] 03:35, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
::Please review ], our policy on biographies of living persons. There is no verifiable, published source regarding Wales' *current* philosophical opinions, and your selective presentation of information presents an obvious bias. — ] ] 23:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
*:Fair enough. Given recent events, I think it's best to stay away from this article going forward just to be on the safe side. I appreciate the input from others in this discussion. ] ] 03:41, 12 August 2024 (UTC)


== RfC using ] to link ] and ] ==
== nndb is not a reliable source ==


I propose that we add something like this to the top of the article, as Jimbo has an information page other than user page, and there are many other mainspace articles related to Misplaced Pages that links to internal pages like this.
It is clear to me, based on what is on that page, that the source of the information there is mostly the Misplaced Pages article. Therefore, citing it as a source is brain dead. In my opinion, NNDB should never be cited as a source anywhere in Misplaced Pages, but I can tell you with some certainty that using it as a source about me is silly at very best.--] 21:35, 19 August 2006 (UTC)


{{For|the personal user page and related internal page|User:Jimbo Wales|WP:JIMBO}}
:I included it on the basis that its info was more specific than anything that (as far as I am aware) has ever been in this article; it would follow logically that it was not sourced from here. It is not a website that I have ran into before, so I don't know much about its agenda/standpoint either. If it is the privacy of the information that you obejct to then, re ], someone (or indeed you, under that policy I think) could remove the content. --] 19:40, 20 August 2006 (UTC)


There was a ] on this, editors refused to link the user page in the article itself because it would constitute an exception, but the new proposal using a "for" template to link the user page does not constitute an exception per above. ] (]) 22:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
::Indeed, someone has removed it over the last 24 hours anyway. --] 19:42, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
* '''Oppose''' per the previous discussion, this is still a blaring ] violation. It shows internal strength to not let our guard down when writing about Misplaced Pages, and instead write the article in the exact same way we would about unrelated subjects. In no other context would it even be conceivable to link to someone's official website at the very top of the article rather than at the bottom in the "external links" section, so we must not do so here. ] ] 22:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
*:] only applies to ] and not ] though, and this is an internal link, not jimbowales.com which would belong at the bottom. ] (]) 00:11, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
*:: It's only a "internal link" because you're letting your guard down in exactly the way I said not to do. Please read the edit notice: "This article relates to Misplaced Pages itself. Please note that links to non-article namespaces should be treated as external links and not included in the body. Misplaced Pages is not a reliable source, so references to it must comply with WP:ABOUTSELF." ] ] 01:14, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
*:::That edit notice exists in other pages such as ], ], ], etc and still use hats containing internal links. Do you suggest to remove those hats? ] (]) 10:07, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
*::::Pinging participants in ] @] @] @]
*::::Pinging participants in ] @] @] @]
*::::Let's see which is the consensus on this. ] (]) 21:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
*:::::<s>Whoever this Noel Body is, I just don't trust him.</s> Whatevs. ] (]) 22:05, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
*:::::Per the newly added COI section on my user page, I don't think I'm the best person to be commenting here. ] ] 22:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' per Pppery, non-article namespaces are treated as external links in articles related to Misplaced Pages itself. Also, the fact that other pages also use these hats isn't a good argument, and I would suggest also removing them: someone searching for our project page ] most likely isn't going to type ]. ] (] · ]) 23:01, 2 November 2024 (UTC)


== Newer 2024 image? ==
:::It might follow that it was not sourced from here. It might also follow that it was not sourced at all.--] 20:58, 20 August 2006 (UTC)


Not sure whether or not it'd be right from me to change the infobox portrait myself, so I decided to ask y'all here. I propose that the current 2023 image (which has an admittedly distracting blurry background) is changed to a newer, fresher image from the 2024 Wikimania. Below are my proposals. I personally favor Option C.
==Accountability==
<gallery>
Is there some reason you can not support accountability for editors on Misplaced Pages? I can see no reason to keep Misplaced Pages from being sued if you do not have a way to make sure editors are responsible for their entries. Attempts to avoid responsibilty for entries by claiming anyone can correct the entries are hopeless at best.
File:Jimmy Wales in New York City March 2023 blurred cropped.jpg|Current image
] <font color="660000" size="1">Facts are stubborn.</font> ] 04:53, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
File:Jimmy Wales 2024 portrait 3x4 (1).jpg|A
:Perhaps I chose the wrong word. Perhaps it would be better to say "require" accountability. As long as people can edit anonymously there will be a problem. ] <font color="660000" size="1">Facts are stubborn.</font> ] 05:08, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
File:Jimmy Wales 2024 portrait 3x4 (2).jpg|B
::You may mean to post at ]; this is the talk page for a mainspace article apropos of Jimbo. ] 06:36, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
File:Jimmy Wales 2024 portrait 3x2 (3).jpg|C
File:Jimmy Wales 2024 portrait 3x2 (4).jpg|D
</gallery> ]<sup>(])</sup> 21:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
:I prefer the current image. It's better lit and less grainy than the other options provided. – ] (] <b>·</b> ]) 18:55, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
:I agree, the current image is best. - <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">] <small>(])</small></span> 06:07, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
:Here are a few new options, and I prefer option F 、 option G.
<gallery>
File:Jimmy Wales visited the Youth Affairs Agency. Photo portrait 2024 (cropped).jpg|E
File:Jimmy Wales visited the Youth Affairs Agency. Photo portrait 2024 (cropped 2).jpg|F
File:Jimmy Wales visited the Youth Affairs Agency (cropped).jpg|G
File:Jimmy Wales welcome to Uzbekistan (cropped).jpg|H
File:Jimmy Wales in Uzbekistan (cropped).jpg|I
File:Jimmy Wales and WikiStipendiya (cropped).jpg|J
</gallery>
:] (]) 12:15, 4 January 2025 (UTC)


:F is great. No odd facial expression, everything well. ] (]) 22:19, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
==Message from an Attorney on Living People Bios Abuse==
:I prefer the '''current image'''. It looks like a professional headshot, has the best facial expression of all of these, and is fresh enough to not be out of date. –] <small>(])</small> 06:04, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
"I think that Misplaced Pages is going to bite the big one anyway. They're fast and loose with untrustworthy and incorrect information, always on the edge of libeling someone, and very easy to manipulate by anyone with an angle to play. I believe there are lawyers out there with very sharp knives looking them like a tempting Thanksgiving turkey. We just have to find the right cause of action so as to create a class of plaintiffs."

Latest revision as of 06:07, 15 January 2025

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jimmy Wales article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
Former good article nomineeJimmy Wales was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 14, 2005Articles for deletionKept
August 14, 2007Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
August 31, 2007Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
March 25, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
January 5, 2017Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
Current status: Former good article nominee
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconMisplaced Pages Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Misplaced Pages, a collaborative effort to improve Misplaced Pages's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Misplaced Pages.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconInternet culture High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconChicago Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconComputing: Websites Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Websites (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconFinance & Investment Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBusiness Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Indiana Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconAlabama
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama
WikiProject iconBiography
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
WikiProject iconSpoken Misplaced Pages
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Misplaced Pages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Misplaced Pages
WikiProject iconObjectivism (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Objectivism, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ObjectivismWikipedia:WikiProject ObjectivismTemplate:WikiProject ObjectivismObjectivism
WikiProject iconOpen (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen
Media mentionThis article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
The following Misplaced Pages contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
This talk page is only for discussions concerning Misplaced Pages's article on Jimmy Wales.
The contents of the Jimmy Wales Foundation page were merged into Jimmy Wales on 14 December 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.


Date/age issue

There is a date/age issue in the second paragraph of the "Early life and education section". "When he was three, in 1968" cannot be correct if he was born on August 7 or 8, 1966. In 1968 he was either one or two, not three. Timothy Cooper (talk) 09:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

That Daily Beast source says "When he was three, his mother bought a World Book Encyclopedia from a door-to-door salesman..", so no year mentioned. I am unable to open the first source, The News Courier, either original or archived, so can't see what it says. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
@Martinevans123 Returning to this, the other source says: "Doris Wales’ husband, Jimmy, wasn’t sure what she was thinking when she bought a World Book Encyclopedia set from a traveling salesman in 1968. Their first-born son, also named Jimmy, was not yet 3." So the cited sources disagree about whether he was 3 or not yet 3.  Mystery Merrivale  (talk) 05:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Jimbo

Sure we need to mention he’s username in the intro? Barely any sources mention it, and it isn’t a common name given to him. Cheers. Encyclopédisme (talk) 16:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Errrm, the article opens with: "Jimmy Donal Wales (born August 7, 1966), also known on Misplaced Pages by the nickname Jimbo Wales..." So that's the 15th word in? Martinevans123 (talk) 16:55, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
What? That’s my point. It’s in the intro. Yet it’s a username without any real-life importance. (I mean that it’s not notable enough to be mentioned in the intro. It’s not a common name, it’s his username). Jimmy Wales has no special rights! Down with the dictatorship! Encyclopédisme (talk) 16:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, I misunderstood your comment. I think it's been there for quite a long time. And I think it probably makes him more accessible, to editors and readers alike. I also can't imagine anything much less like a dictatorship. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:04, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
@Martinevans123: Inform yourself better before making bold claims with no factual truth (see: Dictatorship of neo-socialism). As to Jimbo Wales, you might think I’m a picky asshole, and I might think it myself, and it might be true, but clearly this goes against policies, or more generally the way biographies are written. This is just a guy who created an online encyclopedia, might be this one, who knows? That this guy is also coincidentally a user on Misplaced Pages should not be in the article, and definitely not in the intro. Cheers. Encyclopédisme (talk) 17:30, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
What an wonderfully enlightening essay, full of "factual truth". Thank you so much for sharing that. And yes, what an amazing coincidence that is - an inventor occasionally using his own invention. Who knows, maybe that nice Mr Musk will be using "X" before too long? Martinevans123 (talk) 17:42, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
@Martinevans123: This biography is like any other. The username Jimbo Wales, is not a common way of calling him, and is not described enough in the sources to be notable. Encyclopédisme (talk) 17:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
And this is an article Talk page, like any other. So, as per WP:BRD, we need to arrive at a consensus to remove that detail, instead of just edit warring? Martinevans123 (talk) 17:53, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
@Martinevans123: Sorry. Then let’s discuss. Taking aside what I said before, I did genuinely want to discuss if his username, which is not really notable in any way, should be mentioned in his article. Considering that, yes, genuinely, this article is nothing special, and if Elon Musk was editing Misplaced Pages, his account would not be mentioned. In other words, stating that he edits Misplaced Pages under Jimbo Wales, provided there is a source, can be added, but having Jimbo Wales in the intro just seems a little bizarre. He is not commonly referred to as such, and the Misplaced Pages:Glossary has nothing to do at the very top of an article. He is not commonly referred to as such, only in Misplaced Pages, and only by those who know he is there. Encyclopédisme (talk) 18:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Experience shows that no good comes from new editors popping in here and poking the bear. I know it's terribly unfair that Jimbo gets special treatment just because he founded Misplaced Pages but most of us have learned to live with it. See WP:NOTBURO and WP:IAR for why rules that generally apply are not always applied if there is a good reason to do otherwise. Johnuniq (talk) 00:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
@Johnuniq: I get it. Again, sorry if it seemed that way. What I find frustrating is that what I said on my first message was serious, I genuinely want to discuss if we need to put his username in the Intro. It legitimately feels bizarre. It’s not a common name by which he is called, I also know that Misplaced Pages "rules" are just recommendations, and I also do not care that much about this intro. Cheers. Encyclopédisme (talk) 01:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Ignore every single rule… This sums it up perfectly. I am legitimately asking if we can keep a not commonly known username of an online encyclopedia, as an alt/name of Jimmy Wales, in addition to making it sound professional by writing "is known on Misplaced Pages", instead of "known on Misplaced Pages by his username". And in fact, it makes this article a lot less professional, seriously, I’m not kidding. Cheers. Encyclopédisme (talk) 01:24, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
New Scientist Jimbo nickname source, took about 20 seconds to find this one. Randy Kryn (talk) 01:58, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Ok. I better shut up now shouldn’t I? Cheers, and happy new year. Encyclopédisme (talk) 02:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Looking forward to Twitterpedia. Now that might well be a dictatorship? But at least we'd get updates 25 times a day. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:14, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

For the next time this comes up, Encyclopédisme (talk · contribs) was CU indeffed and globally locked on 27 June 2024. Johnuniq (talk) 00:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Hatnote

JLCop recently removed the hatnote. I reinstated it for now but I do think this subject is worth discussing, given that projectspace links within mainspace are generally discouraged. I noticed that Steven Pruitt also has a similar hatnote but that this is not the case for the average person listed at List of Misplaced Pages people. Thoughts? Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 03:44, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Delete. JLCop (talk) 00:16, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

RfC using Template:For to link User:Jimbo Wales and WP:JIMBO

I propose that we add something like this to the top of the article, as Jimbo has an information page other than user page, and there are many other mainspace articles related to Misplaced Pages that links to internal pages like this.

For the personal user page and related internal page, see User:Jimbo Wales and WP:JIMBO.

There was a previous discussion on this, editors refused to link the user page in the article itself because it would constitute an exception, but the new proposal using a "for" template to link the user page does not constitute an exception per above. Sir Kenneth Kho (talk) 22:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Newer 2024 image?

Not sure whether or not it'd be right from me to change the infobox portrait myself, so I decided to ask y'all here. I propose that the current 2023 image (which has an admittedly distracting blurry background) is changed to a newer, fresher image from the 2024 Wikimania. Below are my proposals. I personally favor Option C.

  • Current image Current image
  • A A
  • B B
  • C C
  • D D

Nursultan Malik 21:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

I prefer the current image. It's better lit and less grainy than the other options provided. – Anne drew (talk · contribs) 18:55, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
I agree, the current image is best. - FlightTime (open channel) 06:07, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Here are a few new options, and I prefer option F 、 option G.
  • E E
  • F F
  • G G
  • H H
  • I I
  • J J
Nagae Iku (talk) 12:15, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
F is great. No odd facial expression, everything well. Nurken (talk) 22:19, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
I prefer the current image. It looks like a professional headshot, has the best facial expression of all of these, and is fresh enough to not be out of date. –Novem Linguae (talk) 06:04, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Categories: