Revision as of 07:39, 26 August 2006 editEl C (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators183,782 edits →Questionable comment on your part: thus ends our discourse← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:07, 19 November 2024 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,133,055 edits →ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
Old talk at ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] | |||
|archive= User talk:Dominic/Archive%(counter)d | |||
|algo= old(21d) | |||
|maxarchivesize= 40K | |||
|counter= 42 | |||
}} | |||
{{archive box| | |||
], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] | |||
}} | |||
== |
== A barnstar for you! == | ||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
I took the liberty of recording your enactment of the 6-month ban on T-man at ]. Hope that's OK. It probably should be noted at AN/I as well, I suppose, but I'll leave that to you — I don't want to put words in your mouth. —] <small>(] • ])</small> 06:00, 31 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
:I actually think it was routine, I had spoken to Tito and Shanel about the possibility before, and in any case, arbcom is not about to overturn its own ruling, so the discussion at AN/I would be rather pointless. Thanks for cleaning up after me and making the necessary log though. :) ]·] 07:29, 3 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Real Life Barnstar''' | |||
::No problem. I only mentioned AN/I because of the clause in the decision about T-man's probation, which says "a note must also be placed on ]", but I suppose that's about the probation rather than his six-month ban, which was put aside while the mentorship was tried. I didn't mean to be telling you how to do your job! :) —] <small>(] • ])</small> 07:39, 3 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thanks for your hard work organizing WikiConference North America! --] <sub>(])</sub> 16:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
== Oct 26: Wikidata Day NYC == | |||
== Ericsaindon2/Coolcaesar == | |||
{|style="background: white; color: black; border:1px solid #6881b9; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em;border-radius: 8px;" | |||
I feel kinda iffy about putting up all those redirects for deletion (see ] for the redirects) from Ericsaindon2's attempted renaming of that arbcom case. Moving the case pages would probably result in rapid reverts, so he just keeps editing the template to change the parameter to "Ericsaindon2/Coolcaesar" so it points to redirects. If the redirects go, its harder. Could you consider just deleting those redirects (they're sort of implausable typos for anyone but eric himself), else would you mind if I threw them up on RfD? ] 01:13, 1 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
|- | |||
!colspan=2 style="font-size:150%; padding: .4em;"|October 26: ] | |||
|- | |||
| style="padding-left: .6em;" | | |||
] | |||
You are invited to ''']''' at ] in Manhattan, in celebration of ]'s 12th birthday. This event, held by our chapter in collaboration with Pratt and ], will be our third annual celebration of Wikidata Day. It will feature spotlight sessions, lightning talks, and the customary Wiki-cake, while those unable to attend in person will be able to watch a livestream. | |||
==MSTCrow== | |||
While I (obviously) agree with you that there's enough troublesome behavior to warrant ArbCom action, a quick look at the ArbCom page tells me that you folks are already up to your eyeballs in work, so practically it may not be a good idea -- especially if, as seems likely to me, MSTCrow is on his way down the slippery slope to a community ban. Under the theory of "give 'em enough rope and they'll hang themselves", it won't take much more edit-warring, insults, pointless wikilawyering -- note his defense of {{User|Lingeron}} -- and occasional outright lies for him to alienate a critical mass of editors/admins, which would render ArbCom action moot. | |||
All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's ]. | |||
Besides, if he's true to form, any ArbCom case involving him would be wikilawyered up the wazoo, all intended to prove that it's everyone else's fault. His blocks certainly haven't taught him a damned thing (''I've been blocked ''twice'', not five times, and both times the blocks were vindictive and not based on fact...'', as he claimed on his talk page) and I kind of doubt ArbCom sanctions would do more than provide him a martyrdom issue, either. | |||
* Saturday, October 26, 2024 ''']''' ('''''' and also optionally ]). | |||
We'll see, I guess. So far, no other ArbCom members have weighed in, and depending on how they feel, this may be moot. <small>Note: Copied to Bishonen.</small> --] | ] 07:46, 2 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
*:''11:00 am – 5:00 pm'' | |||
*:Pratt Manhattan (rooms 201 and 214), 144 W 14th Street | |||
*:RSVP off-wiki is '''required''' for building entry! | |||
|} | |||
== Editor's Barnstar == | |||
{{award2|image=Barnstar2.png|size=100px|topic=The Editor's Barnstar|text=I award Dmcdevit this barnstar for his efforts in clearing the Common duplicates from Misplaced Pages.''']''' <nowiki>|</nowiki> ] 02:01, 3 August 2006 (UTC) }} | |||
<small>(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from ].)</small> | |||
== My RfA and your vote == | |||
--] via ] (]) 00:06, 11 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
{| style="text-align:left; border: 1px solid darkgreen; background-color:honeydew;" | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Pharos@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Meetup/NYC/Invite_list&oldid=1249936319 --> | |||
|- padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;" | |||
|] | |||
|style="font-size: 100%; align:center"|Hi Dmc,<br>Thanks for participating in ]! Ultimately, no consensus was reached, but I still appreciate the fact that you showed up to add in your two cents. I thought about what you wrote. I've reached the conclusion that it is best to support a user in a time of crisis, but to not defend it if there is nothing to defend. You can feel free to talk to me about it or add some advice on ]. | |||
<br>Sincerely, ] (]·]·]) | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
==My comments on Ambuj.Saxena's RFA== | |||
Hello : - ) Sorry about questioning your wording. I'm annoyed at other users comments about English literacy. I was trying to make the point that our most experienced and trusted users do not always make the meaning of their comments perfectly clear. Take care, ] ] 17:04, 3 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
== Arb case:Kehrli == | |||
Hello, | |||
I have been waiting patiently for some response by the committee regarding this arbitration case ]. I do not mean to solicit but it seems necessary or even helpful to bring this to the attention of the committee members directly. | |||
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
Thank you--] 18:08, 3 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
:Arb request extensively updated, including input by another editor and recent threats and administrator impersonation.--] 18:58, 8 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
== ] == | |||
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
so what irritates me more are the garbled and grammarless netspeakers like, for example, Deon555, above | |||
<small>Retreived from ]</small> | |||
<br>Excuse me? --]|]|<font color="green">]</font> 08:34, 4 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
Kind Regards, | |||
== WikiProject == | |||
] | |||
Hi. In view of your recent remarks in a RfA, I thought that ] could interest you. Cheers, ] 17:31, 4 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
==Honest apology == | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 --> | |||
''Crossposted from ]'' | |||
::Not to users: I don't know if this is the right place to state this, but I justthink its important you know this : I've stopped doing thesr things (about 1-2 weeks ago) and am making good edits, please ask a couple of other editors, particulary the ones who commented on my talk pahge (including the archives) and the Pokémon Collaborative Project. I am about to apologize to HighwayCello, im being truthful about this, so please read my ], cheers —]]] <sup>] • ]</sup> 18:43, 4 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
:::I apologized —]]] <sup>] • ]</sup> 19:01, 4 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Thank you. I think the best thing you can do is come back after your ban is over and try to work cooperatively with others next time. ]·] 06:58, 5 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
::But a year is too long, i'd easily go on parole and probation, but a year is too long for someone who has stopped doing these things, perhaps we should discuss the matter. I also got a barnstar for growing into a posirtive way, so please see my talk page, chers —]]] <sup>] • ]</sup> 10:19, 5 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
== November 22 + 26: Free Culture Friday and Wikicurious photo event! == | |||
== TuzsuzDeliBekir == | |||
{|style="background: white; color: black; border:1px solid #6881b9; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em;border-radius: 8px;" | |||
Hi, | |||
|- | |||
!colspan=2 style="font-size:150%; padding: .4em;"|November 22: ] | |||
|- | |||
| style="padding-left: .6em;" | | |||
] | |||
You are invited to ''']''' at ] on Friday, November 22. This event will feature a reception with ] staff in the afternoon, followed by a more informal salon and game night, utilizing Prime Produce's vast collection of ]s. No experience of anything at all is required. All are welcome! | |||
I'm pretty sure that {{user|85.100.72.198}} and {{user|85.97.104.189}} is ]. First off, the IPs are located in ], his hometown and where he currently goes to university. Secondly, you'll notice that 85.100.72.198 only has 3 edits but somehow (and before I reverted him on the ] and ] articles, too). Should those two articles be semi-protected? I recall that TuzsuzDeliBekir used to log out after he was blocked as he had a dynamic IP, which makes me even more sure that it's him. —<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">]</span> 07:19, 6 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
* Friday, November 22, 2024 | |||
*:''1:30 pm – 7:00 pm'' | |||
*:Prime Produce, 424 W 54th St | |||
|- | |||
==Which diffs?== | |||
!colspan=2 style="font-size:150%; padding: .4em;"|November 26: ] | |||
|- | |||
| style="padding-left: .6em;" | | |||
] | |||
You are also invited to ''']''', the third event of the beginner-focused Wikicurious series, at ] on Tuesday, November 26, in collaboration with and ]. All are welcome to attend, especially those interested in ] or contributing to ]. We will explore the art of capturing the moment through photography and learn the basics of Wikimedia Commons, and (weather-permitting) we are also planning a photo walk, so bring your camera (or use your smartphone)! | |||
Dmcdevit, there is some uncertainly in the H.E. ArbCom case as to which diffs you'd referred in recommending I'd be sanctioned, as you'd only cited "evidence". I disagree with your proposed finding, but have little hope of speaking to all the diffs put forth in "evidence" in the requisite time. On talk, it's centered on Muhammad, but for my part I'm not certain from your statement that this is the subject to which you'd referred. It'd help me address your concerns if you could be more specific.] 08:33, 6 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Note: I'm not ignoring you, I just got caught up today. I'll make sure to put specific diffs into the finding tomorrow. ]·] 07:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks. Also, I've been apprised that Tony Sidaway is on break. Can I ask if you'd received the e-mail I'd sent him?] 07:31, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
* Tuesday, November 26, 2024 | |||
Thanks for your post. I'll take a look.] 07:03, 8 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
*:''3:00 pm – 8:00 pm'' | |||
:Also, yes, your first email has gone through to all the arbitrators via the mailing list. ]·] 07:08, 8 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
*:Jefferson Market Library, 425 6th Ave | |||
*: is '''required''' for event entry! | |||
|- | |||
::Thanks for the heads up. I've created ] of my user talk page for your, and other editors', review. Comments are appreciated.] 09:01, 10 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
|''All attendees at Wikimedia NYC events are subject to the ].'' | |||
|} | |||
== Ya know == | |||
I wonder sometimes . --]<sup>]</sup> 12:15, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
:I know. It's just frustrating. I must say though, I am grateful that Penny slipped up. :) I had no inkling it was her until that last post on the Halle Berry talk page. The part where she mentioned that there is no source because Berry never said it was the dead giveaway. But yeah. Me leave? Nah. I think the most I've gone without an edit in my 20 months here is about 2 days. Just gets frustrating after awhile. And they never just take their block nicely. Ever. --]<sup>]</sup> 04:11, 8 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
::Joshua Z just reverted a post she made to this very page. God I love trolls. --]<sup>]</sup> 04:04, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
:::Thanks for the help. Looks like she has stopped for now. --]<sup>]</sup> 05:53, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
<small>(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from ].)</small> | |||
== My Recall == | |||
--] via ] (]) 15:32, 11 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hello. Your response will be appreciated. Thanks. - <b>]</b><small> ]/]</small> 16:30, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Pharos@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Meetup/NYC/Invite_list&oldid=1256254640 --> | |||
== Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research == | |||
== It's open season! lol == | |||
. lol --]<sup>]</sup> 20:34, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Gibraltarian's been getting worse lately, yes. Take a look at ], too. The only solution I can think of right now is dealing with the ISP or waiting it out... ]·] 20:50, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
Hello, | |||
== M/z dispute == | |||
Hi Dmcdevit, | |||
I wonder what made you vote against me on this issue? I still think that I am defending the official notation and that Nick is defending a minority POV. Could you give me some hint where, you think, I am wrong in this issue? --] 11:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ]. | |||
== ] == | |||
Take the survey ''''''. | |||
Indeed, I only looked in ] this time. I'll talk to you later if I catch you online about the bot. Cheers, ]]] 04:53, 13 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
Kind Regards, | |||
== Timothy Usher placed on Probation == | |||
] | |||
: Dmcdevit, Just thought you may haven't seen Timothy's defence here. --] 07:35, 15 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
== The his excellency case == | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 --> | |||
I brought this up with Fred as well. Just making sure I get the ear of a couple of arbcom members. :) I am wondering if you and the arbcom can clarify something on the proposed decisions page. Do these sanctions cover just the His excellency account or do they cover the His excellency account and the previous account that the user edited under? Otherwise, I'm afraid of H.E. simply switching accounts. What's on the page now is not clear. --]<sup>]</sup> 19:52, 19 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
== Adminship == | |||
Well, I have been thinking about your (second) offer to nominate me for admin status. I accept. I suppose it is time, and I do want to be of more help to Misplaced Pages. However, this is probably my busiest time of year. In addition to work, and teaching, I will be away from home on family business/activities for almost all of September. So, can we target the nomination for the 2nd week in October, or so? And I would appreciate any advice you might have? Thanks for your interest. ] 00:57, 22 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
:That's fine by me. I won't have reliable internet access for a few more days until I'm all moved in, so I'll talk to you more then. :-) ]·] 19:01, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
== Appeal == | |||
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
I come here not to tell you that your statement in response is a load of hogwash (although it is) but that you ought to have recused. ] | ] 13:16, 22 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Well that's a new tactic. And why is that? ]·] 18:59, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
==Questionable comment on your part== | |||
</div> | |||
I take exception to your mischaracterization as to my purported involvement and conduct, and am seeking for you to provide ''actual evidence'' to that effect so that others be able to verify your claims; that is, beyond the realm of speculation & superficial appearences. I fear you might be inadvertantly absuing your role as arbitrator, so perhaps a more ''substantive'' explanation on your part is due. ] 13:02, 24 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
</div> | |||
:Um. Huh? How does "I am not sure you are " purport anything? You demand I provide evidence of my uncertainty? Sorry, but that was a good suggestion: enforcement ''should'' only be done by uninvolved admins, and I'm ''not'' sure if you are (and your attitude doesn't particularly motivate me to look more closely). How about you tone down the misplaced hostility. ]·] 19:12, 24 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 --> | |||
::It would be useful for you to actually review the material you are commenting on; if you question my involvement, please offer something substantive, or it comes accross as misplaced hostility and disrespect for my tired efforts in dealing with this abusive user. ] 20:12, 24 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
:::I am not sure whether you are involved or not. That is a basic declarative sentence which does not question anything. I was just giving you a straightforward answer to the question posed. Your accusations and assumptions of my meaning, frankly, don't make any sense. ]·] 02:47, 25 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
::::Tis unfortunate you did not find it fit to find out; I suppose declerative speculations are easier as they do not involve any effort. ] 05:01, 25 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
:::::I am speaking plainly. There is no speculation involved, as I made clear; you are just playing with words because for some reason you have animosity towards either me or the Arbitration Committee as a whole or both. It isn't welcome. The courtesy of answering your question as posed, even if I didn't perform any further research, was clearly wasted. ]·] 21:50, 25 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
::::::Plainly or otherwise, you are continuing to speculate and it is not welcomed. While I appreciate you answering the question, I take exception to the speculations and the innuendo. I think I deserve more support than that from you. ] 06:46, 26 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
:::::::It doesn't matter how much you want it to be, I haven't. I'm done with this useless discussion. (In case you didn't notice, I gave you good advice on how to deal with Zeq, namely, to put the issue to ANI if a ban doesn't fit into arbcom's ruling.) ]·] 07:05, 26 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
::::::::With much "scary" innuendo, to boot. I don't want it to be but it is — "''because'' have animosity towards either or the Arbitration Committee as a whole or both" also counts as a speculation. But since you're "done with this useless discussion," it's over, thus ends our discourse. ] 07:39, 26 August 2006 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 00:07, 19 November 2024
Archives |
/Archive1, /Archive2, /Archive3, /Archive4, /Archive5, /Archive6, /Archive7, /Archive8, /Archive9, /Archive10, /Archive11, /Archive12, /Archive13, /Archive14, /Archive15, /Archive16, /Archive17, /Archive18, /Archive19, /Archive20, /Archive21, /Archive 22, /Archive 23, /Archive 24, /Archive 25, /Archive26, /Archive27, /Archive28, /Archive29, /Archive30, /Archive31, /Archive32, /Archive33, /Archive34, /Archive35, /Archive36, /Archive37, /Archive38, /Archive39 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
A barnstar for you!
The Real Life Barnstar | |
Thanks for your hard work organizing WikiConference North America! --Another Believer (Talk) 16:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC) |
Oct 26: Wikidata Day NYC
October 26: Wikidata Day in New York City | |
---|---|
You are invited to Wikidata Day in New York City at Pratt Institute School of Information in Manhattan, in celebration of Wikidata's 12th birthday. This event, held by our chapter in collaboration with Pratt and Girls Who Code, will be our third annual celebration of Wikidata Day. It will feature spotlight sessions, lightning talks, and the customary Wiki-cake, while those unable to attend in person will be able to watch a livestream. All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct.
|
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
November 22 + 26: Free Culture Friday and Wikicurious photo event!
November 22: Free Culture Friday | |
---|---|
You are invited to Foundation and Friends' Free Culture Friday at Prime Produce on Friday, November 22. This event will feature a reception with Wikimedia Foundation staff in the afternoon, followed by a more informal salon and game night, utilizing Prime Produce's vast collection of board games. No experience of anything at all is required. All are welcome!
| |
November 26: Wikicurious: Capturing the Moment | |
You are also invited to Wikicurious: Capturing the Moment, the third event of the beginner-focused Wikicurious series, at Jefferson Market Library on Tuesday, November 26, in collaboration with WikiPortraits and AfroCROWD. All are welcome to attend, especially those interested in photography or contributing to Wikimedia Commons. We will explore the art of capturing the moment through photography and learn the basics of Wikimedia Commons, and (weather-permitting) we are also planning a photo walk, so bring your camera (or use your smartphone)!
| |
All attendees at Wikimedia NYC events are subject to the Wikimedia NYC Code of Conduct. |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:32, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)