| Revision as of 13:50, 20 May 2016 editSt170e (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,994 edits Updating nomination page with notices (delsort.js)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:50, 24 May 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''Delete'''--]] 22:17, 25 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}} | |||
| :{{la|Omnisoft services}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) | :{{la|Omnisoft services}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) | ||
| :({{Find sources AFD|Omnisoft services}}) | :({{Find sources AFD|Omnisoft services}}) | ||
| Deleting per ] - does not meet notability guidelines. There are three references on the article; the last two references are dead. Article is rather promotional in nature and the company's website has been taken offline. The article doesn't give any evidence for notability and nor can I find any. <b>]</b><sup><i><small>]</small></i></sup> 23:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC) | Deleting per ] - does not meet notability guidelines. There are three references on the article; the last two references are dead. Article is rather promotional in nature and the company's website has been taken offline. The article doesn't give any evidence for notability and nor can I find any. <b>]</b><sup><i><small>]</small></i></sup> 23:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | *'''Delete''' I found a unsourced revision a couple of months ago that said the company was out of business, which I tend to believe. I also found on the originators talk page that the article was speedily deleted for lack of notability a couple of weeks before this version was created. I'm not sure how that happened, but it still fails. ] (]) 21:41, 19 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | *'''Delete''' I found a unsourced revision a couple of months ago that said the company was out of business, which I tend to believe. I also found on the originators talk page that the article was speedily deleted for lack of notability a couple of weeks before this version was created. I'm not sure how that happened, but it still fails. ] (]) 21:41, 19 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <b>]</b><sup><i><small>]</small></i></sup> 13:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <b>]</b><sup><i><small>]</small></i></sup> 13:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)</small> | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <b>]</b><sup><i><small>]</small></i></sup> 13:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <b>]</b><sup><i><small>]</small></i></sup> 13:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Delete''' One detailed source is not enough for notability. Plenty of time has gone by and there should be a lot more coverage at this point if it were notable. I don't see it. -- ] 03:23, 22 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' as nothing at all here convincing of the applicable notability. ] ] 21:47, 25 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 08:50, 24 May 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury 22:17, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Omnisoft services
- Omnisoft services (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Deleting per WP:COMPANY - does not meet notability guidelines. There are three references on the article; the last two references are dead. Article is rather promotional in nature and the company's website has been taken offline. The article doesn't give any evidence for notability and nor can I find any. st170e 23:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I found a unsourced revision a couple of months ago that said the company was out of business, which I tend to believe. I also found on the originators talk page that the article was speedily deleted for lack of notability a couple of weeks before this version was created. I'm not sure how that happened, but it still fails. MB (talk) 21:41, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. st170e 13:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. st170e 13:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete One detailed source is not enough for notability. Plenty of time has gone by and there should be a lot more coverage at this point if it were notable. I don't see it. -- RM 03:23, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as nothing at all here convincing of the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 21:47, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.