User talk:Aeon1006: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 11:43, 1 September 2006 editJorcoga (talk \| contribs)1,726 edits Jorcoga again← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 23:44, 15 May 2024 edit undoJonesey95 (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Mass message senders, Template editors370,613 edits Fix Linter errors. More needed. Leaving obsolete tags for bots.
(602 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{not around\|3=17 January 2012}}
	{{User:Aeon1006/Userpage}}		{{User:Aeon1006/Userpage}}
			{{User:MiszaBot/config
	<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-2 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User:Aeon1006/Archive-Delta--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE-->
			\|algo = old(7d)
	----
			\|archive = User talk:Aeon1006/Archive-Eta
			}}

	<center>		<center>
Line 7:		Line 10:
	<span style="text-align:center; font-size:1.4em;display:block;">		<span style="text-align:center; font-size:1.4em;display:block;">
	]   Discussion Conventions<br>		]   Discussion Conventions<br>
	<center>{{busy\|]}}</center>
	</span>		</span>
	* Please post new messages at the bottom of the page to prevent confusion, Thanks.		* Please post new messages at the bottom of the page to prevent confusion, Thanks.
	* Please sign your comments. Type <code><span style="background-color:lightsteelblue; border-style:solid; border-color:#7f9db9; border-width:1px;"><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></span></code> after your text or use the ].		* Please sign your comments. Type <code><span style="background-color:lightsteelblue; border-style:solid; border-color:#7f9db9; border-width:1px;"><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></span></code> after your text or use the ].
	* Please use section headings to separate conversation topics.		* Please use section headings to separate conversation topics.
			''See: ]''
	''See:
	]''
	* '''NOTE''': '''Comments expressed on this talk page do not reflect the ideas or beliefs of Aeon.'''		* '''NOTE''': '''Comments expressed on this talk page do not reflect the ideas or beliefs of Aeon.'''
	* '''NOTE''': '''All Anon unsigned comments are removed on sight.'''		* '''NOTE''': '''All Anon unsigned comments are removed on sight.'''
Line 22:		Line 23:
	</center>		</center>
	<br>		<br>
	~~<center>~~<br>		<br>

			{\| align="center" class="notice noprint" style="background: none; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em auto;"
			\|-
			\| valign="top" style="padding: 0.1em" \| {{tick\|40}}
			\| style="padding: 0.1em" \|

			'''Your request to be unblocked''' has been '''granted''' for the following reason(s):
			<br><br>] of ] lifted. Sorry for that!

			''Request handled by:'' -- ] ] 23:11, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
			<!-- Request accepted (after-block request) -->
			\|}

			Basicly that autoblock is casuing some collateral damage. ] ] 23:08, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
	==AMA Help==
			:No problem :) Unfortunately there's no way to prevent that since we can't know the underlying IP before someone complains about the block ;). Sorry! -- ] ] 23:19, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
	Thanks for taking the time to investigate my AMA request with ScienceApologist. I appreciate your suggestion of mediation with him, but we've been through it before, and I'm not convinced of its effectiveness.

			==WP:METEO Active members==
	I saw ScienceApologist reply. He is quite right that I like to describe "ideas opposed to the scientific mainstream", but he is wrong to suggest that this has anything to do with "What Misplaced Pages is not)". Misplaced Pages is quite inclusive.
			{{User:Juliancolton/Active}}

			== ] of ] ==
	I also note that ScienceApologist suggests that I try to include fringe ideas as fact... this is utter garbage, and am well aware of mispresentation, and will provide verifiable citations as needed.
			]

			The file ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	As for "hiding behind policy", I think this is another way of acknowledging that I abide by policy.
			<blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	Thanks again for your time Aeon. --] 21:08, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	%%%%

			Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->
	Yes thanks, I've tried both Article RfC, Third Opinion and Arbitration. I think that one of the problems is that describing fringe material will always be in the minority, and most editors are not necessarily sympathetic. A good example is the ], described as a "new redshift mechanism", but you'd never know by reading the article on ] because most astronomers have never heard of it... yet it isn't an article on "astronomical" redshift. --] 22:40, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

			<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:01, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
	%%%%
			== ] of ] ==
			]

			The file ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	*You can find our previous .
			<blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote>
	*And my previous

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	To summarise, I feel that ScienceApologist is misrepresenting minority views, by personally judging that they are not notable, or worse, pseudoscientific. The result is that certain articles on science, unlike most other articles, lack nearly any criticism, or "non-mainstream" views. For example, the article on ] has next to nothing on alternative views, despite extensive peer reviewed citations. --] 17:49, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	%%%%%

			Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->
	I've started a few requests for comments. While it can be argued that the rightful consensus is achieved, I am not sure that is correct if it is at the expense of NPOV's first statement: "all articles must be written from a neutral point of view, that is, '''they must represent all significant views''' fairly and without bias" (My emphasis)

			<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:00, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
	RfC: \| \|
			== ] of ] ==
	--] 18:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
			]

			The file ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	== Suspected Vandal of Sorts. ==
			<blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	Aeon, I have a slight hunch that a local politician may have attempted to use Misplaced Pages for his own political gain. I know this isn't exactly vandalism, but I am unfamiliar with the protocol in place for this situation. The user in question is ]. The contributions in question have to do with the ], and ] articles. These two men are both candidates for a seat in the ], and as you can imagine, this sort of conduct has arrisen. I reverted some of the changes this user made too the Shapleigh article, and am currently researching the portions of his/her contributions I did not revert. I will document my findings on any other revert on the article's talk page. I also left a message on their talk page on the topic. Getting to the Margo article, what raises concern is that not all the contents of the article are exactly true. I have already tagged the article with {{]}} and {{]}}, and will be going through it over the next couple of days to check the facts. Also, although the author attacked the Shapleigh article with a sort of smear-campaign-style contribution, only a sentence of the Margo article deals with the upcoming election. In all honesty, Margo is somewhat of an unnotable person--although accomplished, his most notable quality is that he is running for a position as Texas senator. Hence, I also marked the article with {{]}}. I need to know how to attain the IP of a user, that way, I may run a trace to see if this user is indeed who I think they are. Please, if you have a moment, look into this situation. Your input would be greatly appreciated. ] 22:46, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
	:Just an update: I am having considerable difficulties figuring out how to deal with this problem. Any adition to the article seems to soon be reverted by the user mentioned above. ] 05:52, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	==CVU==
	Wow. That's a bit ridiculous. =) ] <sup>]</sup> 01:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
	==CVU Page==
	Hey I saw it up for deletion earlier today, funny stuff eh? Unless you meant something else by that talk message and I'm very clueless. ] <sup>]</sup> 04:18, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

	Oh it's back up for deletion again, what is this? Thanks for letting me know. ] <sup>]</sup> 04:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

	==Query about RfC==
	Greetings; I was wondering how one goes about getting a conduct RfC going. I'm writing you because of a recent AfD vote on ], in which you agreed that the nomination (by ] was in bad faith.
	On ], you'll know that (1) editors have tried to work with ], but (2) he doesn't know how to play well with others. Evidence for (1): I took one of his paragraphs and revised part of it in a NPOV and kept it in the article, rather than simply blanket removing his changes. I also improved his criticism section at ]. All well and good. But meanwhile, (2), he continues to insert the same criticism paragraph on ] day after day, despite the fact that he has gotten no consensus for it, various editors delete it on sight, and the first third of it is completely redundant, since the version I edited is in the article. So, we have someone who repeatedly ignores ]. I think many editors agree that this user is disruptive. My question is whether an RfC is appropriate in such a case, or whether there is another avenue. I've been editing for about six months, but I haven't run into much of this before. Thanks for any pointers.--] 13:18, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

	== re: Need to run something by you. ==

	:Have either of the disputants provided links to the formal Mediation and Arbitration cases? I'd think it would be wise of us to look over them both in detail. :-) <small>]</small> <tt><b><font color="#0033CC">]</font></b></tt> <sub><B><font color="#000000">(]/])</font></B></sub> 15:01, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

	== Message for Aeon ==

	Hey man. Listen, I know you're probably upset that the CVU was deleted. But ultimately, it was the right thing to do. It was not the easy thing to do, and it was not the popular thing to do. But it was the right thing to do. And I hope you will understand that someday. Until then, I wish you peace and love, and please keep up the good fight against vandalism. At the end of the day, we're on the same team.

	] 21:44, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

	----------------------------------------------------


	{\| style="border: 1px solid {{{border\|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color\|#fdffe7}}};"
	\|rowspan="2" valign="top" \| ]
	\|rowspan="2" \|
	\|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" \| '''The Resilient Barnstar'''
	\|-
	\|style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" \| I, Dr. Chatterjee, hereby award this barnstar to ] for his grace under pressure, reasonable discussion, and good sportsmanship during the debate over the CVU's deletion. Aeon is a credit to Misplaced Pages, and I look forward to working with him in the near future. ] 00:25, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
	\|}

			Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->
	== Defcom ==

			<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:00, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
	Ok, it should work now. I have no idea what happened. ]] 15:39, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
			== ] of ] ==
	:Doc moved it per GUS, and said someone could adopt it. So, I figured what the hay. ]] 15:43, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
			]
	::I'm going to need help in fixing all the links, do you think you can help out? The Wiki programming is acting funny for me right now. The descriptions page is also acting wacky. ]] 15:45, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
	:::Hmmm, you may be right. I've almost solved all of it, just need to userfy most of it. ]] 15:48, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
	Oh, I was going to use AWB to fix the links. Do you want me not to do that? ]] 15:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
	:I'm not going to do anything right now considering this is contested, Doc really needs to weigh in. ]] 16:03, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

			The file ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	== Un-Esperanzian colour ==
			<blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	It is? Why wasn't I informed? In my opinion, in those large quantities, it's really garish and off-putting, not something we want for our main page. Thanks and regards, —]<font color="green">]</font>] <sup>]</sup> 17:39, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	==AMA information==
	] and ] appear to be the same person, as demonstrated . Each has vandalised the ] mercilessly. The comments included on the page suggest that most of the vandalism is attributable to one person. ] 20:21, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

			Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->
	==Paleoconservatism Dispute==
	I repeatedly said that if anyone has a legitimate concerns that they raise the issues here on a case-by-case basis. Psychohistorian refused. He demands verification for facts that no one seriously questions. Also:
	*He claims an article is "unsorced" that already has over 100+ ref tags. The George W. Bush page, the most disputed page here, only has 54 or so cites. The accuser refuses serious discussion, other than to demand MORE citations.
	*He insists that I personally provide "countless citations," which is not humanly possible, or let him delete large swatches of text. Then he trolls this site seeking admins to help him with the above.
	*His views on citation are so extreme that even if a fact is ''sourced'', but the source page is taken down, he claims it is therefore unsourced and presumed unverifiable. ] 22:14, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

			<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:00, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
	Unfortunately, I must ask you not to participate in any issues concerning me, due to a conflict of interest. I just discovered that you are part of something called a "cabal." I explained on my talk page why I believe this group lacks civility, good faith and credibility.<br>
	1.) People associated with this group recently blitzed me with threats and spurious accusations. My talk page tells the story. Not only was I browbeaten for what I did not do, I was permitted no reasonable defense. I do not wish to risk repeating this situation.<br>
	2.) Also, a "cabal" is the online equivalent of a star chamber. You may claim that the name is merely a joke, but my point stands.<br>
	3.) Nothing here should be interpreted as denying PH his rights. I simply ask that this "cabal" leave me alone. If he wants to find an "advocate" outside of this group, I'm willing to communicate with that person. My concerns here have nothing to do with him or the article under discussion. ] 05:23, 1 September 2006 (UTC)(cc to my talk page)

			</div></div>
	==Jorcoga again==
	Hi Aeon, I've noticed you haven't been replying to my posts. By now, the answers to your questions have been archived, so I'll tell you again that I want a banner with black & red. Have a good break. ] 11:43, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:44, 15 May 2024

This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Aeon1006 has not edited Misplaced Pages since 17 January 2012. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Æon's User Space Wednesday, 25 December

VANDALISM THREAT

Guarded

Aeon's Main Page
Mediation
Leave Message
Trophy Cabinet
WikiThanks Images
RfA's I have Supported
RC Patrol Stats
My Humor Userbox Page

WP:METEO Active members

User:Juliancolton/Active

Proposed deletion of File:BstarDrib.png

The file File:BstarDrib.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:United States Navy Rating Symbol of the AG's.gif

The file File:United States Navy Rating Symbol of the AG's.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Cyclone barnstar (icon).jpg

The file File:Cyclone barnstar (icon).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Defender of the Wiki (ribbon).png

The file File:Defender of the Wiki (ribbon).png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Categories: