| Revision as of 19:32, 1 September 2006 editUberCryxic (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,162 edits →Alert← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:45, 9 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,114 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Kirill Lokshin/Archive 20) (bot | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|3=October 2022}} | |||
| <!-- Please do not modify the section below -->{{User:Kirill Lokshin/Notice}} | |||
| Note retired banner now on user page. | |||
| {| style="margin-top: 0; margin-left: 0; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 0; border: silver double 3px; background-color: transparent; width: 100%; background: white; " | |||
| {| style="float: right; padding: 0.5em; border: 1px silver solid; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;" | |||
| |- | |||
| | {{Archives|auto=short|search=yes|image=|style=background: transparent; margin: 0; text-align: center; border-color: transparent;}} | |||
| | style="padding: 1em; " | | |||
| |}{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| * Please sign your posts with four tildes (<code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>) and add comments on a new topic in a . | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 200K | |||
| * I will respond on '''your''' talk page unless you request otherwise. | |||
| |counter = 20 | |||
| * '''''Questions, requests, criticism, and any other comments are always welcome!''''' | |||
| |algo = old(5d) | |||
| | style="padding-top: 1em; padding-right: 1em; padding-bottom: 1em; padding-left: 5em; text-align: center; " | | |||
| |archive = User talk:Kirill Lokshin/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| '''Archives'''<br/><br/> | |||
| }}<!-- Please do not modify the section above --> | |||
| ]<br/> | |||
| ] | |||
| |- | |||
| | colspan="2" style="padding: 1em; border-top: 1px dotted silver; text-align: center; " | Threads older than seven days are automatically archived by ]. | |||
| |}<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-7 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User talk:Kirill Lokshin/Archive II--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE-->__FORCETOC__<!-- Please do not modify the section above --> | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
| == Short version of WPMILHIST Navigation == | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 11:20, 13 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==] has been nominated for merging== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 06:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Perhaps it would be a good idea to make a shorter version of ], for short pages like ]. It could have all the links in the first section and just the headings of the remaining sections, or the remaining sections collapsed by default. | |||
| ==] has been nominated for renaming== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 06:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| On the other hand, guidelines grow, and it may not be worth the trouble to make it, maintain a copy, and keep swapping it in and out of pages. Just an idea. ''—] ] <small>2006-08-15 21:13 Z</small>'' | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| == Formating issue == | |||
| Its come to my attention that US army forts are located in articles that adressing such installations as "Fort X", where "X" is the name of the fort, and "Fort X, Y" where "X" is the fort and "Y" is the area that it is located in (Texas, Illinios, etc). For the sake of uniformity we should decide on one methode of presenting the names instead of using both methodes. IMHO, we should use the former and reserve the latter for cases where two forts happen to share the same name. For examples of what I am talking about, you can see ], ], ], and ]. ] 21:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :] suggests that US city articles be formated as "City, States" and other well known cities be formated "City, Country"; however it should be noted that multiple locations in a country can share the same name, especially when the name is popular (this is one reason why so many city names share disambiguious links). Military installations do not generally share names since that would create confusion as to the base being referenced (I would venture an educated guess its also the reason why each service branch uses a different naming convetion, like AFB, Naval air satation, Fort, etc). Unless the names of military installations are shared on a multinational level (like having a George AFB in the US for George Washinton and a George AFB in Engalnd for King George) I do not see that there would be a problem in IDing a base simple by name and not by county, state, region, etc. Unfourtunatly, as I am preparing to leave the city for a few days I do not have the time to conduct a thurough investigation into the issue, so this at the moment is just observations. When I return I will look into it more thoruoghly and let you know what I turn up. ] 22:27, 16 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 16:03, 11 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Kirill, I have had some time recently to look into this matter further. I found three lists —] | |||
| == Nomination for merger of ] == | |||
| ], and ]— which hi-light the standard format of US army installations based on the format currently used by the US Department of Defense. It would appear the Army bases are usually named "Fort X", where x is the name of the fort, while Navy and Air Force guys seem to use the format "NS/NAS Y" or "Y AFB" where "Y" is the name of a certain citiy, or town, or other civilian location. I think that we ought to adopt this format for US military installations so that they can all conform to the names that they are refered to here. ] 01:18, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ] on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> ] (]) 19:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Most pages already have the correct name, but some (like ]) were moved from there original name and can not be returned to those pages without going through the requested moves page, unless of course an admin such as your self undoes that move and restores the original name to the page. To keep this from happening in the future maybe we ought to come up with our own naming convention, if we have not done so already. ] 17:26, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == FA nominations in Version 0.5 == | |||
| Hi, Kirill! | |||
| I have a question: I saw your nominations of FA articles in ]. And I was wondering: Most of these secions, such as ], ], ] and ] have no or veeeeeeeery few inline citations. And in some of them even the references are poor. Why are these articles remaining feautired?? | |||
| I'm even more astonished, since we are now striving to have the articles well-referenced and full with inline citations. It does not look fair to me. | |||
| Thanks! And congradulations for your re-election (you know you are already reelected!)!--] 18:02, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : We knew he would be before the vote even started... :P -- ] <sup>]</sup> 13:02, 24 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Portal== | |||
| Hey can you try to put ] into <nowiki>{{portal|Military of the United States|Image:Naval Jack of the United States.svg}}</nowiki>? Thnx ]</font><font color="green">]</font><font color="#007FFF">]</font> 19:37, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==POW Camps== | |||
| Where does this subject fit inot overall Military History project? | |||
| I can't find the right place. | |||
| And of course none of my new articles are listed under new articles for that reason | |||
| ] 14:30, 24 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Yo Kirill - I request your help in making ] featured. Please do check out ]. ] 17:01, 24 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Unfinished work FAC == | |||
| Thank you very much for the constructive criticism of ] at ]. I have responded to your comments and made some changes to the article. Even though it is no longer active as an FA candidate I would still greatly appreciate you reviewing what I have said and done, should you have the time. Cheers, ] ] 21:13, 24 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for the quick response. I've been working on the article this evening, and hope that I've met most of your concerns. ] ] 23:35, 24 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::It seems that Raul654 decided that the nomination had gotten stale and, after many additions to the article, I have ] it. Please take a look to see if it meets your approval. Thanks, ] ] 13:24, 25 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == American Civil War task force == | |||
| Given how active you are in this area, I thought you might be interested in the newly-created American Civil War task force of the Military history WikiProject; someone of your considerable experience would be extremely welcome, I think. Kirill Lokshin 20:18, 25 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Thanks, but I am not too interested in group administrative activities such as this. I will check out their project page from time to time, but I intend to spend my time writing articles. Considering the very low volume of ACW content editing (not including the blizzard of renaming categories, date formats, and generating random assessments on Talk pages), I really wonder why you bothered to create a separate task force in the first place. ] 20:47, 25 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Rewriting a B-Class article== | |||
| Kirill. What's the policy on a total rewrite of a B-Class article ie:]? The article needs major work. Can I totally rewrite it, or I am I only permitted by Misplaced Pages policy, or wiki etiquette, just to edit/adapt what's already there? ] 22:25, 25 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Thanks. Although it may take me a couple of months. ] 22:45, 25 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Autotagging reloaded == | |||
| Hi Kirill, | |||
| Since our article autotag thing is going nowhere, I was thinking about another thing in order to make it pass: | |||
| I would create a page "/Autotag" either in the WP:MILHIST tree or somewhere else, explaining what autotag is, why is it useful and so on. (just a few lines, mind you). | |||
| But most important, it will have a queue (wow, I drank too much, can't even write that word right... <_<) listing all the operations the bot will perform, such as: | |||
| * '''<nowiki>{{AFV}}</nowiki>''' - All articles having this infobox are military history and will be tagged - XXX total as of DD/MM/YYYY, YYY remaining | |||
| * '''<nowiki>{{AmericanCivilWar-stub}}</nowiki>''' - All articles having this infobox pertain to the history and will be tagged - XXX total as of DD/MM/YYYY, YYY remaining | |||
| Project members (and perhaps other people too) will be able to discuss the choice of stubs, propose some more, oppose some of them and so on. | |||
| The idea is to show we're completely transparent on the subject, that we're receptive and we discuss the potential impacts. Sure thing, it will be quite cumbersome (although I think I'll manage it), but it is better rather than having all this thing going nowhere. Cause I don't know if you have the idea of how much articles are untagged just because they don't have a talk page... well I do, and it is quite terrifying... <_< | |||
| What do you think? | |||
| Best, | |||
| Graf. | |||
| == Remaining work on Version 0.5 == | |||
| Hi Kirill, thanks for starting the WikiProject Council, that seems like a very useful idea. I wondered if you could take a look at ] and give me some feedback? If you have time, some comments on the ] and the Lakes and Seas set noms. Thanks! ] 05:27, 26 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Fair use image == | |||
| Thanks for your message, as you are no doubt aware the Potter image was originally tagged as GFDL. If you'd been to commons you'd have seen ] when I saw the tag had been queried (you may have to clear your cache). Thanks for the heads up anyway, - ] 06:16, 26 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: August newsletter == | |||
| Will start tomorrow 15:00 UTC or something, I'm just too wasted right now and need go sleep :) -- ] <sup>]</sup> 00:38, 27 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Delivery complete :) -- ] <sup>]</sup> 14:37, 27 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==The Vote for Cooridinator== | |||
| ] | |||
| Congrats on being elected (or reelected, I cant remeber which at the moment) as lead cooridinator! In honor of you achievement, I present you with these stars. I wish you and your staff the best in the coming term. ] 00:46, 27 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==WWII Question== | |||
| I have an article here on the ], which occured during the Winter War between Finland and the USSR. I was curious as to whether or not this falls under the WWII task force. I am of the opinion that it does. --] 06:39, 27 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks a bunch, as usual! --] 07:44, 27 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue VI - August 2006 == | |||
| The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. | |||
| <small>This is an automated delivery by ] -- 12:20, 27 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Automation department == | |||
| Hi Kirill, | |||
| I created the automation department page at the link you provided (well, the first version of it :). Please tell me what you think :) | |||
| However, we still need to think what can we do about this approval thing... <_< | |||
| Best, ] <sup>]</sup> 14:40, 27 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == {{tl|WPBiography}} == | |||
| Hi Kirill. Do you have the above on your watchlist? (Rhetorical question :) since I'm really asking you to add it if you don't :)). Obviously, it's quite high profile now, and a specific user ({{userlinks|Ghetteaux}}) has twice added a rather useless ''fair use'' image to it. He's had a fairly stern warning this time. In the unlikely event that doesn't do the trick and I'm not here (off to bed shortly) would you take care of it please? Either a short block, protect the template until the morning, or both. I think he's well-meaning so it should be OK. Cheers. No reply needed. --] 22:15, 27 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Request == | |||
| Hi Kirill. Would you be able to preform my requested move at ]? (] --> ]) It's already been 5 days, so it's in the backlog section right now. Thanks! —<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">]</span> 03:24, 28 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks again. —<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">]</span> 16:46, 28 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: Tagging question == | |||
| Sure, will do :)) I'm just seeking for a way to do it in one pass as it currently requires two (and the second is not started yet). -- ] <sup>]</sup> 13:18, 29 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Incidentally Kirill, I find the {{tl|Stubclass}} template to be huge. If we (=all projects using it) don't want to get some complaints about too big templates on talk pages, maybe you can use your super template-fu to try and reduce the size just as you did with our own banner? :) -- ] <sup>]</sup> 13:26, 29 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Well, I can't do it in one pass, so I need two: one to tag non-tagged articles and assess them, second to assess articles already tagged (unless they were already assessed by a way or another). | |||
| And I'm not qualified enough to mess up with advanced replacements in AWB yet... Slower but safer :) -- ] <sup>]</sup> 15:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Thanks for the advice in helping me breath life back into ]. It's such an important project, I think, but it's just lacking in direction. I'm looking forward to reading over what you have in the ] so far. Even in its unfinished state, I'm sure I'll find it very handy. Cheers! – ]] 17:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Sketches are coming == | |||
| ] :) -- ] <sup>]</sup> 18:43, 29 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| This case has closed and the final decision has been published at the link above. | |||
| To summarise, Añoranza is banned for one week and the principals in this matter are encouraged to enter into good faith negotiations regarding use of propagandistic operational codenames for which there are neutral alternative names in common use. | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee. --] 21:56, 29 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Help with ref == | |||
| I can't figure out why this is happening-- ] is using the ref tag and the first one has just the letters listed, and besides that, the first one is not linking anywhere? I happened to also just be peer reviewing ] and noticed it happening there too on their footnote... Do you know what's heppening? ] 01:29, 30 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks! It was driving me nuts, kept thinking I was overlooking something really obvious :-) ] 01:37, 30 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Question == | |||
| Given that the scope of the military history project is so big (and that the project includes various subprojects), would it be possible to design a bot that could track which of the articles falling within the scope of the project (and any of its sub projects) that have been tagged with templates like cleanup, afd, FAC, FARC, etc, and list/categorize them so that editors within the project(s) can see at a glance what pages that fall into their particular group need help? I think this could help with things like deciding collaborations of the week, but the sheer size of the parent project is way too massive to permit a manual check of all articles. ] 03:45, 30 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == project banner template on Categories == | |||
| Are we supposed to tag military related categories? --] 09:19, 30 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Portal Indonesia == | |||
| Umm, so, it has been 17 days since I nominated the ] on ]. I remember you said you want it to stay for 2 or 3 weeks on the nomination page. So, because 17 days is exactly between 2 - 3 weeks, can we decide now? Cheers! -- <span style="font-family: comic sans ms">]</span><span style="font-family: comic sans ms">]</span><span style="font-family: comic sans ms">]</span> 12:14, 30 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for all your help to improve the Indonesian portal! Take care -- <span style="font-family: comic sans ms">]</span><span style="font-family: comic sans ms">]</span><span style="font-family: comic sans ms">]</span> 08:23, 31 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| "Coordinator" is looking good. Thanks. :) – ]] 16:10, 30 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Second Punic war == | |||
| I decided to work over the whole Punic Wars section. Could you take a look or send me someone to check? Especially the Second Punic War (]) I wanted to completly restructure it from a military perspective. I think this way the inner logic of events is presented better to the reader. ] 19:39, 30 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Admin advice== | |||
| Kirill, check out ] and the actions of ], see the edits, talk page and his own talk page. He obviously has a vendetta against BSA, but is using this article, which is an international one in scope and about the youth himself, not any organization to carry out his agenda. Also, there is a FA on the subject, ], for this subject. We get these guys from time to time, but he's by far been the most obstinate. Please advise on how to proceed. I'm asking you as the Scouting project has no active member that's an admin as far as I know and I respect your opinion. Thanks for your time. ] 02:36, 1 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :He just did it again, can you block him for 3RR? RFC now? Should you or I do the RFC? I've never done one and it might be better if someone not involved did it or left a warning.] 02:54, 1 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==The message you left on Spazik's page regarding boy scouts== | |||
| Hey, if you were to read and compare, you'd see that I made a couple changes to what I wrote, which actually makes it an edit and not a revert. We were debating the issue on the talk page and I made appropriate changes to the information I added. If your going to come onto my talk page and admonish me then please at least have the presence of mind to do some reaserch so you don't look like a fool. ] 02:46, 1 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==WikiProject Military History Question== | |||
| Do biography articles on senior civilian Pentagon officials, such as the Secretary of Defense qualify for inclusion in WikiProject Military History? --] 03:30, 1 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == please review ] == | |||
| please review ] | |||
| ] 10:31, 1 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Alert== | |||
| Well...it's sort of an alert. The Tahirih Justice Center article has been discovered by someone who is very anti-IMBRA and who made some major changes to the article recently. I have reverted these, but I may need your help in the future so I'm just letting you know. This person apparently started a whole thread in an online forum where there is even some discussion about personal matters relating to me (see ). He might need to be banned, although we'll see what happens.] 17:23, 1 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| This guy (EnglishGarden) already opened a discussion on AI about me. I've added the link about my personal information there. I have to admit he is a little bit unstable. Just wait and see I guess.....] 18:09, 1 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Umm Kirill, I'm having some more trouble. At ], ], | |||
| " I would be wary of editing articles where a conflict of interests might be presented. On one hand, you're a Misplaced Pages editor and must maintain NPOV when editing. On the other, it is your job, or a family member's job, to promote this organization. I would steer clear of the article if you're unable to be neutral. Furthermore, it is incorrect for you to assume bad faith in the complaining editor. He may have been accused of sock puppetry in the past, but that is niether here nor there. Please remain on topic. Regards to both" | |||
| No apparent care for the personal information. | |||
| EnglishGarden has written things like, | |||
| "You are still not disclosing whether there is financial remuneration in this for yourself. A 19 year old male isn't going to work hard as the webmaster of a Misplaced Pages article on a women's political organization in the Washington area whom his mother is a fundraiser/volunteer for...without some kind of interest." | |||
| "Erald's mother is a fundraiser volunteer for the Tahirih Justice Center. He has written a blatant fundraiser advertisement. Please check the changes I made. Here is the proof that she is a fundraiser/volunteer Mrs. Kolasi" | |||
| Can you please drop a word in there when you have time? Thank you very much. I'm sorry if this is all too sudden. It was definitely weird for me. I came back from class and for two hours straight I've had to deal with this stuff.] 18:26, 1 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I requested that now.] 18:40, 1 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Well, can you at least write another message to EnglishGarden telling him to stop using personal references and to stop being disruptive....or something to that effect. His focus on my mother precludes me from responding. As I told him, I would ignore any personal remarks from now on in the talk page. He is really flying off now, and he continues to make inflammatory and incorrect statements (claiming the person who I told you about was an administrator when in fact he wasn't) in his website. Thanks.] 18:58, 1 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| EnglishGarden wrote this in reply to your message, | |||
| "Thanx Kirill. I have proven that this young man's mother is a fundraiser for the TJC. He has admitted as much on the complaint board. He has not disclosed that he is not receiving remuneration as the webmaster for this article. There is a family conflict of interest and another member has asked him to steer clear of this board as a result. | |||
| For removing POV, the words "exploit" and "marriage broker" and "mail order bride" either need to be removed or placed in quotations so it is very clear that the editors do not pass judgement on the online dating industry where there is a restraining order on the IMBRA law in question. See Restraining Order. This is the son of a fundraiser for Tahirih who is obviously the chosen webmaster. He should take a step back and ask himself what he is doing. This topic is clearly not in his personal interest otherwise."] 19:32, 1 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:45, 9 December 2024
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Kirill Lokshin has not edited Misplaced Pages since October 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Note retired banner now on user page.
|
Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Military history/Any
Template:WikiProject Military history/Any has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:20, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Category:Battles involving Bengal has been nominated for merging
Category:Battles involving Bengal has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Category:Wars involving Frisia has been nominated for renaming
Category:Wars involving Frisia has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Talk:List of battles involving Sweden for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Talk:List of battles involving Sweden is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Talk:List of battles involving Sweden until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Gvssy (talk) 16:03, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Nomination for merger of Template:WPMILHIST Task force assessment level category
Template:WPMILHIST Task force assessment level category has been nominated for merging with Template:WPANIMATION assessment quality work group level. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 19:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC)