Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Keira Nicole: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:20, 8 August 2016 editRebecca1990 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,967 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 09:46, 13 March 2023 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,667,544 editsm Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (3x)Tag: Fixed lint errors 
(12 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 20:41, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}


:{{la|Keira Nicole}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) :{{la|Keira Nicole}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>)
Line 10: Line 17:
*'''Delete''' She does not pass even the low notability criteria we have set for pornographic actors.] (]) 15:18, 6 August 2016 (UTC) *'''Delete''' She does not pass even the low notability criteria we have set for pornographic actors.] (]) 15:18, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' -- coverage does not suggest notability. ] (]) 18:33, 6 August 2016 (UTC) *'''Delete''' -- coverage does not suggest notability. ] (]) 18:33, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - she won individual award, she meets the notability criteria of WP:PORNBIO. <span class="unicode" style="white-space:nowrap;">]<span style="display:inline-block; margin-bottom:-0.3em; vertical-align:-0.4em; line-height:1.2em; font-size:85%; text-align:left;">]<br/><small>(en-2)</small></span></span> 01:35, 7 August 2016 (UTC) *'''Keep''' - she won individual award, she meets the notability criteria of WP:PORNBIO. <span class="unicode" style="white-space:nowrap;">]<span style="display:inline-block; margin-bottom:-0.3em; vertical-align:-0.4em; line-height:1.2em; font-size:85%; text-align:left;">]<br/><small>(en-2)</small></span></span> 01:35, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
**Comment: an award confers some nature of ''possible'' notability, but ''actual'' notability still needs to be demonstrated via "significant coverage in reliable sources" as per ]. ] (]) 09:31, 7 August 2016 (UTC) **Comment: an award confers some nature of ''possible'' notability, but ''actual'' notability still needs to be demonstrated via "significant coverage in reliable sources" as per ]. ] (]) 09:31, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
**'''Comment'''. The PORNBIO standard requires a "well-known" and "significant" award, which is a higher standard than an "individual" award. This !vote misrepresents the applicable guideline and should therefore be disregarded. ] (]) 13:08, 7 August 2016 (UTC) **'''Comment'''. The PORNBIO standard requires a "well-known" and "significant" award, which is a higher standard than an "individual" award. This !vote misrepresents the applicable guideline and should therefore be disregarded. ] (]) 13:08, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Line 16: Line 23:
*'''Delete''' fails GNG. ] (]) 02:40, 8 August 2016 (UTC) *'''Delete''' fails GNG. ] (]) 02:40, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. Passes ] with her ] for Best Actress (Couples-Themed Release), which is a well-known/significant industry award that is not a scene-related/ensemble category. ] resulted in keep due to several award wins, among them XBIZ and Best Actress. Winning a subcategory of Best Actress is just as valid under PORNBIO as winning a generic Best Actress award. It's not unusual for porn awards to have Best Actress subcategories instead of a generic Best Actress award. XBIZ having subcategories is no different from ] having subcategories, ] having subcategories, or ] having , subcategories. The Eva Angelina AfD I cited above had participants who voted keep with her AVN Best Actress (Video) award, a subcategory/not generic, being one of the reasons why. Even if, in addition to a Best Actress subcategory, an award show had a generic Best Actress award, the recipient of the subcategory would also pass PORNBIO. , and participants in her AfD (]) voted keep with her Venus Best Actress (International) award being one of the reasons why. XBIZ's Best Actress (Couples-Themed Release) is just as valid under PORNBIO as AVN's Best Actress (Video) and Venus's Best Actress (International). ] (]) 07:18, 8 August 2016 (UTC) *'''Keep'''. Passes ] with her ] for Best Actress (Couples-Themed Release), which is a well-known/significant industry award that is not a scene-related/ensemble category. ] resulted in keep due to several award wins, among them XBIZ and Best Actress. Winning a subcategory of Best Actress is just as valid under PORNBIO as winning a generic Best Actress award. It's not unusual for porn awards to have Best Actress subcategories instead of a generic Best Actress award. XBIZ having subcategories is no different from ] having subcategories, ] having subcategories, or ] having , subcategories. The Eva Angelina AfD I cited above had participants who voted keep with her AVN Best Actress (Video) award, a subcategory/not generic, being one of the reasons why. Even if, in addition to a Best Actress subcategory, an award show had a generic Best Actress award, the recipient of the subcategory would also pass PORNBIO. , and participants in her AfD (]) voted keep with her Venus Best Actress (International) award being one of the reasons why. XBIZ's Best Actress (Couples-Themed Release) is just as valid under PORNBIO as AVN's Best Actress (Video) and Venus's Best Actress (International). ] (]) 07:18, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
::What is the coverage that demonstrates the subject's notability? An awards confers some measure of ''presumed'' notability, but the ''actual'' notability still needs to be demonstrated via significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, as per ]. ] (]) 09:20, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as nothing at all close for the substance of independent notability. ] ] 22:50, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
*'''Comment'''. All delete votes above are either claiming that Nicole fails ], even though she undeniably passes it ("Has won a well-known and significant industry award"), or asking that the article be deleted because she fails GNG, which doesn't matter. ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]. ] (]) 15:25, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
**] may apply. As part of AfD, each article is evaluated on its own merits, I believe. ] (]) 15:32, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' The keep-ers seem to have neglected to read the introduction to PORNBIO, which says: "People are likely to be '''notable''' if they meet any of the following standards. ... <u>meeting one or more does '''not''' guarantee that a subject should be included.</u>" (bolding in original, underlining added) The article says absolutely '''nothing''' about Keira Nicole except that she's won and been nominated for awards. That's just not enough to be notable. —&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 18:14, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' - While the ]s are certainly a ], the "Best Actress—Couples-Themed Release" award appears to be a niche award category instead of a "significant" award category. The ] award categories for "Best Actress, Video" & "Best Actress, Film" are apparently a relic of the days when certain ]s were release in certain theaters or just ]. In general, well-developed Misplaced Pages articles need to have significantly more information in them than is displayed here ]. ] (]) 02:38, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' -- I am also curious why this (and related) articles prominently display ''Nominated'' entries. Are these awards like the Oscars, with a nomination being a rare honour, or are dozens of people get nominated in each category? It also seems there is an awful lot of awards and all of them are claimed to be ''significant''. ] (]) 02:46, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 09:46, 13 March 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz 20:41, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Keira Nicole

Keira Nicole (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No qualifying awards, just nominations. No independent reliable sourcing. No non-trivial biographical content. "Best Actress—Couples-Themed Release" is a recently created, little-noted award category with no discernible selection criteria; in fact. "Couples-Themed Release" is an arbitrary/meaningless category -- the term gets no GBooks hits, and virtually all, if not all, the Ghits relate to this or related award categories, not do any topic with independent meaning. Even if this were to get a technical, tenuous PORNBIO pass, that is outweighed by the utter failure to even remotely approach meeting the GNG. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 13:13, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:21, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:22, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:22, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
What is the coverage that demonstrates the subject's notability? An awards confers some measure of presumed notability, but the actual notability still needs to be demonstrated via significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, as per WP:GNG. K.e.coffman (talk) 09:20, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.