Misplaced Pages

:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:00, 9 August 2016 editHexafluoride (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers1,838 edits →User:24.84.132.125 reported by User:Hexafluoride (Result: ): Deleted request. Wrong type← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:46, 24 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,291,145 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive490) (bot 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Noticeboard for edit warring}}
__NEWSECTIONLINK__{{no admin backlog}}
<noinclude>{{pp-move-indef }}{{/Header}}] ] <!--Adds protection template automatically if semi-protected--><noinclude>{{#if:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|{{pp|small=yes}}}}__NEWSECTIONLINK__{{no admin backlog}}{{/Header}}] ]
{{pp-move|small=yes}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}} |archiveheader = {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}}
|maxarchivesize = 250K |maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 323 |counter = 490
|algo = old(36h) |algo = old(2d)
|key = 0a3bba89e703569428f2aab1add75bd7d7d1583d2d1f397783aee23fda62b06f |key = 0a3bba89e703569428f2aab1add75bd7d7d1583d2d1f397783aee23fda62b06f
|archive = Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive%(counter)d |archive = Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive%(counter)d
}}</noinclude>
}}</noinclude><!--<?xml version="1.0"?><api><query><pages><page pageid="3741656" ns="4" title="Misplaced Pages:Administrators&#039; noticeboard/Edit warring"><revisions><rev>=Reports=>
<!-- NOTE: THE *BOTTOM* IS THE PLACE FOR NEW REPORTS. -->
NOTE: THE *BOTTOM* IS THE PLACE FOR NEW REPORTS. -->


== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked) == == ] reported by ] (Result: Warned users) ==


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|2013 in the Philippines}} <br /> '''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Giganotosaurus}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Yaysmay15}} '''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|PaleoFile}}
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. -->


Previous version reverted to: '''Previous version reverted to:'''


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. -->
#
Diffs of the user's reverts:
# #
# #
# #
#




<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary -->
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. -->
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:


<u>Comments:</u> <br />
The article ] is subject to edit-warring by ] repeatedly because of reverting removals of non-notable, redundant, ], and "over-hyped" events. ] keeps on reverting Yaysmay15's edits, but one reverted, he reverts them again. Hariboneagle927 even warned him on this , but still continued to come back reverting his removals, as in this .


'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' (regarding another now-dormant edit war on a related page)
Yaysmay15 has also other edit-warring cases, mostly on years in the Philippines articles, like ] articles. But no one reported that user for edit-warring with other users on those articles.-] (]) 14:36, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ -->
:I attest to this. I've been warning the user and asked the user to explain his edits but did not listen to such request after all or don't even bother to comment in anyway where I could have any hint on their position on their edits. I can only guess why they keep on insisting on reverting problematic edits, that they want to include any widely-covered events nationally (in the Philippines), no matter how it is WP:ROUTINE or overhyped ] (such as the case of the "mystery death" of Nicole Ella during the New Year's Eve; which is caused by a stray bullet and its not uncommon to have stray-bullet deaths in the country during this period.)] (]) 16:42, 5 August 2016 (UTC)


'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' N/A, did not revert and talked directly to editor instead
::I agree, as His ] are primarily targeted on "XXXX in the Philippines " articles, and the user doesn't even place edit summaries to explain the edits, and the events he has been adding/re-adding, once reverted, is beyond the consensus of the Tambayan Philippines community that events in XXXX in the Philippines articles should be notable enough or not routine. ] is very serious about this matter, but Yaysmay15 would not listen to any warning by other users, like him. He has been edit-warring with Hariboneagle927 and seems to be reverting his edits in violation of ], and seems to be making "XXXX in the Philippines" articles a summary of nationally-covered events, whether routine or non-notable (in violation of ], ] and ]). I suppose Yaysmay15 should be blocked for a week or a month to stop those editing behaviors, that seems to violate those mentioned policies.--] (]) 06:55, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
:::Although the user has been temporarily blocked for 48 hours which I assume is related to this case. A new user with a similar name has continued to make similar edits. ] which has a strikingly similar name to blocked user, ] who has a similar editing history. See ].] (]) 03:06, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
*'''Result:''' ] has been blocked 48 hours by ] for sockpuppetry. Two other accounta, ] and ], have been indef blocked. ] (]) 15:50, 8 August 2016 (UTC)


'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''
== ] reported by ] (Result: Page protected) ==


] | ] 20:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Galkayo}} <br />
*Both users have been {{AN3|w}}. ] (]) 21:14, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|92.0.27.29}}
*:Those users and {{userlinks|Mei23448}} seems continuing edit wars on '']'' and '']'' articles.
*:1.
*:2.
*:3.
*:4.
*:5.
*:6.
*:In addition, PaleoFile posted personal attack on talk page of Mei23448.
*:Both users does not provide reliable sources, PaleoFile only proposing X post in edit summaries and cite nothing, while Mei23448 also does not cite anything to change. Both users needs to be blocked. (Jens Lallensack seems only trying to revert vandalism, so is not problematic than those two) ] (]) 14:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
*::17 tons for Sachicasaurus has been debunked so I changed it and some user cant accept that his favourite animal isnt as big as he wants. ] (]) 18:35, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
*:::If you have a dispute, you may discuss it on the article's ]. ] | ] 23:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
*::Also 15 ton for Sachicasaurus is based on the Sachicasaurus reconstruction from Diocles. ] (]) 21:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: Both blocked 48 hours) ==
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. -->


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Robert de Quincy}} <br />
Previous version reverted to:
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Pipera}}


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. -->
Diffs of the user's reverts:
#
#
#


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
#
#
#
#
#
#


'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary -->
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. -->
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:


'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' ,
<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too -->
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''
<u>Comments:</u> <br />


<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
'''He is putting a false claim on Misplaced Pages. This is the false claim:''' The city is divided into two zones, where the main portion forms part of ] state, the Suusacley (Israac) district is governed by the ] administration.<ref name="Argapiis">{{cite news|last=Abdul Latif Dahir|first=Suleiman Abdullahi|title=Galkayo: A peaceful island in Somalia|url=http://www.africareview.com/Special+Reports/-/979182/1137760/-/10umx61z/-/|accessdate=9 June 2013|newspaper=Africa Review|date=3 April 2011}}</ref><ref name="Spbengm">{{cite news|title=Somalia: Puntland businessman elected new Galkayo mayor|url=http://www.garoweonline.com/artman2/publish/Somalia_27/Somalia_Puntland_businessman_elected_new_Galkayo_mayor_gazette.shtml|accessdate=9 June 2013|newspaper=Garowe Online|date=27 August 2009}}</ref>


Pipera has chosen to add grandchildren and great grandchildren to the Robert de Quincy article. I have stated on the article talk page this is unnecessary and off-topic to Robert de Quincy. They have also misrepresented what a source states, which I have also stated on the article talk page.
'''The source he provided was checked and it did not contain his claim. He is putting false information on Misplaced Pages.'''
{{reftalk}}
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ -->
*{{AN3|p}} Both IPs warned before I saw this report. ] <sup>]</sup> 18:34, 6 August 2016 (UTC)


Even while filling out this report Pipera has reverted me twice, choosing to add back an unused 1790 source to the Sources section, and readding Robert's grandchildren and great grandchildren. This after being told by user:Ealdgyth(17 December 2024) that ]. Honestly, I don't think Pipera is here to build a community encyclopedia. --] (]) 23:56, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
== ] reported by ] (Result: Stale) ==
{{hat|content user added to the article.--] (]) 00:44, 21 December 2024 (UTC)}}
:I have added the followi9ng:
:Robert married Orabilis, daughter of Nes fitz William, Lord of Leuchars. .
:Orabilis was married three times to Morggán, Earl of Mar and Adam of Fife, as stated in the links provided.
:They had:
:Saer de Quincy (died 1219), married Margaret de Beaumont, daughter of Robert de Beaumont, 3rd Earl of Leicester
:Unknown (daughter) de Quincy married de St Andrew
:Sir Saer I de St Andrew of East Haddon married Matilda de Dyve daughter of Hugh Dyve and Agnes they had issue:
:Robert de St Andrew married Albreda
:James de St Andrew (1228)
:Ralph de St Andrew (1228 - 1278)
:William de St Andrew
:Laurence de St Andrew
:Saer II de St Andrew
:John de St Andrew
:Sir Roger de St Andrew (d before 1249)
:Orabilis and Robert divorced.
:Secondly, he married Eve of Galloway, who was previously married to Walter Barclay. .
:it is alright for the children of Saer de Quincy to be placed on his page here, and not for the children of his sis5ter not to be placed here.
:They are also the grandchildren of the said parents and deserve the right to be placed there as well as the marriages of Roberts first wife and her three husbands as well as the second marriage of Robert her husband.
{{hab}}
:I do not think I have broken any rules by adding this to his article supported by the external links provided. ] (]) 00:20, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
:I have posted to the talk page this is also incorrect. ] (]) 00:21, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
:I am not in an edit war, I posted new information which is educationally correct and was removed without any academic argument it was gone. no pre talk on the talk page concerning what was supplied by the person deleting the information.
:They firstly need to raise and entry and then talk and resolve, ] (]) 00:23, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
:I am expanding these articles not rolling them back. I have been editing here since at least the year 2001, I was editing entries for the 9/11 project obituaries for the people that passed in 9/11. ] (]) 00:26, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
:See
:User talk:Paramandyr: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Paramandyr&diff=prev&oldid=1264014635
:Latest revision as of 23:20, 19 December 2024 edit undo thank
:Paramandyr (talk | contribs)
:removed, stay off my talk page
:Tag: Undo ] (]) 00:33, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
*{{AN3|bb|48 hours}}. ] (]) 00:38, 21 December 2024 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: Stale; content removed) ==
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Red pill and blue pill}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Mauro Lanari}}


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Sigma Boy}} <br />
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. -->
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|2804:14C:BBE7:44CE:B8E5:FEDB:67F5:D84D}}


Previous version reverted to: '''Previous version reverted to:'''


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. -->
#
Diffs of the user's reverts:
# #
#
#
#


<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary -->
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. -->
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:


'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too -->
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
<u>Comments:</u> <br />


'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ -->
{{u|Mauro Lanari}} has also been inserting this content on ] and attempting to edit war for it to remain there. Pinging {{u|Gothicfilm}} and {{u|Grayfell}}, who have been dealing with this editor. ] (]) 06:50, 7 August 2016 (UTC)


<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
:<u>Correct</u> diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: --] (]) 12:50, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
If the IP reverts one more time, could someone please block them and revert their nonsensical edit? (Okay, maybe it's not "nonsensical", but it's incorrect.) ] (]) 02:59, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
*{{AN3|s}} and seems to be a non-issue now. Conversation occurred and agreement was reached. ] ] 16:18, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
*{{AN3|s}}; content removed until a consensus is found ] (]) 13:21, 22 December 2024 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: HyeSK is warned per another report) == == ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 24 hours) ==


;Page: {{pagelinks|Yerevan}} '''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Lindy Li}} <br />
;User being reported: {{userlinks|HyeSK}} '''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Napoleonjosephine2020}}


;Previous version reverted to: '''Previous version reverted to:'''


;Diffs of the user's reverts: '''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
#
#{{diff2|733509652}} 8 August 2016
#
#{{diff2|733445486}} 8 August 2016
#
# {{diff2|733399357|15:07, 7 August 2016 (UTC)}} "Reverted back to Western Armenian. I have also had another agree with me on this change and I backed it with solid arguments."
#
# {{diff2|733312201|22:29, 6 August 2016 (UTC)}} "Changed back to Western Armenian"


;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|733407591|16:17, 7 August 2016 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three revert rule on ]. (])
# {{diff2|733411207|16:51, 7 August 2016 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring on ]. (])"


;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:




'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
;<u>Comments:</u>


'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' Zilch.
Still edit warring with different users despite being previously warned without reaching a consensus with other users (even though he claims one person agrees with him).This time, it's on ]. It's clear to see that this user hasn't learned from his previous warning, therefore he's being reported again. '''] (])''' 16:54, 7 August 2016 (UTC)


'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''
It's not a claim, wiseguy. Look in the edit history and you will see a user clearly telling Yerevantsi he agrees with me. ] (]) 21:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)HyeSK


<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
HyeSK is a single-purpose user. His response to my calls to discuss the matter in the talk page was: . He should be blocked for edit-warring. His editing is simply disruptive. --] ] 08:36, 8 August 2016 (UTC)


Note: I am not involved in this situation whatsoever, just found this in recent changes. ] • ] • ] 05:16, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
I am not at all a single purpose user. I am here to put in place the truth and to improve Misplaced Pages. One of those improvements involves providing information to increase knowledge, specifically on Armenian articles. Armenian includes two primary dialects of Eastern and Western Armenian. Pages referring only to one dialect as "Armenian" are misleading, as that portrays only one dialect as the sole dialect of the language. If we are here to improve Misplaced Pages, denying this fact only hinders that cause. ] (]) 09:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)HyeSK
:{{reply|HyeSK}} This is not the place for you to ]. You have to work ] in a ]. ] <sup>''''']'''''</sup> 09:25, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
:{{reply|Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi}} - Forgive me, but how is me stating their are two major dialects "RIGHTGREATWRONGS"? It's simply a fact.] (]) 10:13, 8 August 2016 (UTC)


:The editor whose revisions I am trying to undo publicly attacked the subject as an "opportunistic grifter". No one who uses such inflammatory language should be editing the page of this subject. This is common sense and journalism 101. He is clearly motivated by animus against her and should not be editing her page. Why is this even in question? ] (]) 05:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
:If you're here to improve Misplaced Pages, why don't you stop edit warring and bring this dispute to a talk page. Even though there is one, you're '''still''' edit warring! You have to realise edit warring is highly disruptive and because you continue to do so, you find yourself being brought here again, HyeSK. '''] (])''' 09:24, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
::@]
::"This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule." Also, "When reporting a user here, own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand ] and the definitions below first." I am not involved, don't complain to me please. Nothing I can do here. ] • ] • ] 05:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
:::You reported me because I tried to stop someone from violating Li's page! Why is the saboteur getting a free pass? He's clearly motivated by animus and admitted as much on her talk page. ] (]) 05:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
::::Did you read my comment? You and the other person will have behavior analyzed and decisions will be made accordingly. I'm not singling you out since I have no idea what's happening, you just happened to start the edit war. ] • ] • ] 05:28, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
::::Napoleon, I think this is a manifestly unfair characterization of what occurred on my talk page (not yours). , for those curious. ] (]) 05:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
*{{AN3|b|24 hours}} ] ] 06:47, 23 December 2024 (UTC)


== ] and ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==
The one edit warring is the one who reverted my edits. Yerevantsi was warned about edit warring a month ago for the same reverts. The information I added only adds to the quality of the article. I have added this to the talk page on Yerevan's article:


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Warburg effect (oncology)}} <br />
Armenian language
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|2601:40:CE00:1590:24F6:A73A:9F20:74C}} and {{userlinks|2601:40:CE00:1590:80BC:3313:5A8D:AACE}}
The Armenian language has two primary dialects - Eastern and Western. Eastern Armenian is spoken primarily in Armenia, Russia, Georgia, and Iran. The other major populations of Armenians around the world are speakers of the Western dialect. These nations include the U.S., France, UK, Germany, Brasil, and Argentina among many others. In the current day and age, the two dialects use different spellings for various words, and many times completely different words for the same topic. Eastern Armenian has been highly permeated by the Russian language while Western Armenian and Krapar (Classic Armenian) have not. Also, the Eastern Armenian alphabet has been modified at various times under Russian and Soviet rule, with various letters being modified or completely removed to "Russify" the language.


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
I, on various wikipages, have added the Western Armenian spelling to the pages, as it is relevant to proper understanding of the Armenian language. Listing only one dialect (Eastern) as the language Armenian (hy) is dishonest and disingenuous. It provides an incorrect understanding of the language. My edits are providing a greater understanding - is this not what we are all here to do?


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
The arguments from two wikiusers are that Western Armenian is not the official language of Armenia (neither is Eastern Armenian - Armenian is the official language) or that Eastern is more widely spoken (which is in fact false). Since when do either of these reasons negate the relevance of a language? And, since when do false arguments hold weight? HyeSK (talk) 09:31, 8 August 2016 (UTC)HyeSK <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
#
#
#
# (second IP)


This user had no understanding of Misplaced Pages policies. Instead of reaching a consensus on the talk page he prefers edit warring. He has one mission here: to make Western Armenian relevant in places where it isn't. Furthermore, he does not seem to be competent in the matter as he confuses different spellings of Armenian with its standardizes forms/dialects. --] ] 09:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)




Yerevansti - It is clear you do not have a solid grasp of the Armenian language or it's history. There are two (2) standardized forms of the Armenian language - Western and Eastern. This is a fact which anyone is able to easily find. Your arguments are false and have no weight. And, how is Western Armenian "not relevant" when writing in forms of the Armenian language? Please, explain this. I have entered a section in on the talk page of the article, which is posted above.] (]) 09:58, 8 August 2016 (UTC)HyeSK
::And you don't seem to understand that Երեւան is not the "Western Armenian spelling" but the spelling in the classical/traditional orthography. Iranian Armenians speak Eastern Armenian, but use the aforementioned spelling. Is it really that hard to understand that Western Armenian ≠ classical spelling. --] ] 22:59, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
*'''Result:''' ] has been warned by ] per another report. ] (]) 02:19, 9 August 2016 (UTC)


'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
== ] reported by ] (Result: 48 hours) ==


'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' N/A, did not participate in reverts. Warned first IP on their own talk page
;Page: {{pagelinks|Bexar County, Texas}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|50.183.99.254}}


'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''
;Previous version reverted to:


<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
;Diffs of the user's reverts:
I believe both IPs are the same person. The second IP's first edit is a stating {{tq|I'm not Ravidmurthy, but I am the one who has been doing most of the editing here.}}, and after leaving that and another comment proceeded to make the same reversion (#4 above) as the other IP, a little more than 2 hours after #3. {{userlinks|CipherRephic}} was also involved in the edit war, but agreed to stop after being warned and has not broken 3RR. ] | ] 21:12, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
# {{diff2|733430922|19:37, 7 August 2016 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 733430500 by ] (])"
# {{diff2|733430259|19:31, 7 August 2016 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 733429640 by ] (])"
# {{diff2|733428235|19:14, 7 August 2016 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 733425957 by ] (])"
# {{diff2|733422899|18:28, 7 August 2016 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 733023915 by ] (])"

;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|733430541|19:33, 7 August 2016 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring on ]. (])"

;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


;<u>Comments:</u>

Keeps removing the pronunciation of this without discussion. Has been both asked to discuss and warned. <font color="blue">]</font> <sup>]</sup> 19:40, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

* {{AN3|b| 48 hours}}. Simple 3RR, was warned. Likely long term editing warring as well. ] ] 19:44, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: Filer Warned) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Yerevan}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|LouisAragon}}



Previous version reverted to:


Diffs of the user's reverts:
#
#
#
#



Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:


Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

<u>Comments:</u> <br />
*Likely ] here, I've already reported the filer for edit warring and he's reported the user reverting his edits here. I don't see any violation here. '''] (])''' 00:04, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
*{{u|HyeSK}}, take note. ] <sup>]</sup> 23:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
*{{AN3|w}} ] <sup>]</sup> 23:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: Nominator blocked 1 week) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|List of sovereign states}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Hebel}}



Previous version reverted to: ]


Diffs of the user's reverts:
# ]
# ]
# ]
# ]



Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: ]


Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: ]

It would seem that's one to many by me and also by Xavier Green himself. I get the impression that Xavier is editing the article about related issues while a discussion about these related matters is going on without and before consensus or closure to the argument in progress. It seems to me he should wait for that. ] (]) 02:27, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
:Actually I haven't made any edits to change the page against consensus at all, my reverts of your edits were to restore the page to the status quo on two matters on which there was no consensus to change based on the current ongoing discussion involving those matters on the talk page. In actuality, it is you who have flaunted the dispute resolution process and have made edits contrary to the ongoing discussion on the talk page.] (]) 03:09, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

:I self reverted for the moment. ] (]) 03:12, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

: So let's discuss here. --] (]) 03:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
::Not here ] . You are in the wrong place. This is another matter. ] (]) 03:12, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
*{{AN3|nb|1 week}} <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">&mdash; ] // ] // ] // </small> 11:31, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
**{{re|Hebel}} You are formally warned to not edit war again. If you feel another editor is not listening nor adhering to consensus, make a formal report at ] and let an uninvolved administrator take a look; please, don't use the mainspace as a battleground. If you hadn't had self-reverted, and happened to have a clean block record, you would have been blocked as well. <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">&mdash; ] // ] // ] // </small> 11:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked) ==

;Page: {{pagelinks|Yuliya Yefimova}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|198.200.64.245}}

;Previous version reverted to:

;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|733550767|16:01, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}} "/* Doping scandals */"
# {{diff2|733549429|15:49, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}} "/* Doping scandals */"
# {{diff2|733547490|15:35, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}} "/* 2016 Olympics controversy */"
# {{diff2|733547164|15:32, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}} "/* 2016 Olympics controversy */"
# {{diff2|733545853|15:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}} "/* Doping scandals */"
# {{diff2|733544526|15:11, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}} "/* Doping scandals */"

;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|733545857|15:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}} "Caution: Unconstructive editing on ]. (])"
# {{diff2|733546072|15:24, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}} "Warning: Disruptive editing on ]. (])"
# {{diff2|733547441|15:34, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}} "Final warning notice on ]. (])"

;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
# {{diff2|733550466|15:58, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}} "/* Doping controversy */ new section"

;<u>Comments:</u>

Initially looked like simple vandalism/using main article as a talk page/soapbox, however continues to add the same material despite reversion from a number of editors. ] (]) 16:06, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
*{{AN3|b}} Blocked for vandalism by {{u|Widr}} ] <sup>]</sup> 23:13, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: Page protected) ==

;Page: {{pagelinks|Kanye West}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|Ajax1995}}

;Previous version reverted to:

;Diffs of the user's reverts:
*Please note: Reverts 1 and 2 occurred after edit-warring user was warned about this report.
#] "(Almost 200, 000 bites to explain a bunch of irrelevant facts, The Beatles article has much less content that this, filled up with 6 million quotes. Misplaced Pages is not his Diary Book)"
#] "Misplaced Pages no needs for that kind of improperly content, that nothing adds to an ENCYCLOPEDIA, we are not his fan site or the Kanye West Official Website, the removed content are fan TRIVIA, Stop!)"
# {{diff2|733553406|16:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}} "What's wrong with this guy, please, build your own Kanye West fan site, you can add all those twitter feuds, misogynist offenses, non-sense behaviours and all of that USELESS content."
# {{diff2|733552054|16:10, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}} "Stop your SARCASTIC behaviour and stop your irresponsible editings. I do not have the enough free time to revert again and again such irresponsible editions by this kind of person. Build your own West fan site. Stop vandalism an Encyclopedia"
# {{diff2|733550447|15:58, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}} "Basta, Stop relocating this oversourced bad content "I'm a vessel, and God has chosen me to be the voice and the connector." "Taylor might still have sex/Why?/I made that bitch famous" it is ANNOYING"
# {{diff2|733547659|15:36, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}} "Undid revision by this person, STOP vandalizing and relocating UNENCYCLOPEDIC, IMPROPERLY, BAD WRITING, REDUNDANT AND FANDOM CONTENT! WHICH which noboy cares but you!"
# {{diff|oldid=733496577|diff=733545215|label=Consecutive edits made from 13:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC) to 15:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}}
## {{diff2|733535588|13:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}} "Reverting addition of stupid content by some jerk fan, "I feel like me and Taylor might still have sex/Why?/I made that bitch famous" Stop adding this kind of shit! Misplaced Pages in not your fan site"
## {{diff2|733535723|13:56, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}} "Reverting addition of stupid content by some jerk fan, "I feel like me and Taylor might still have sex/Why?/I made that bitch famous" Stop adding this kind of shit! Misplaced Pages in not your fan site"
## {{diff2|733537157|14:08, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}} "Trim the associated acts, not according to Misplaced Pages´s policy"
## {{diff2|733537345|14:09, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}} "More stupid content added by this West fan"
## {{diff2|733537988|14:15, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}} "Improperly/fan content in the Lead / excessive detail"
## {{diff2|733538770|14:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}} "This article is filled up with irrelevant /peacock quotes, please add this chit chat to your West fan page or Wikiquote, SERIOUSLY"
## {{diff2|733540410|14:35, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}} "And again this guy oversourcing this RIDICULOUS AND IMPROPERLY content "I feel like me and Taylor might still have sex/ Why? I made that bitch famous.""
## {{diff2|733541499|14:44, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}} "This article needs a detailed clean up, it is filled up "AD NAUSEAM". Misplaced Pages is a serious online Encyclopedia, formal content, competent administrators. no need for this shameful "sourced" stuff"
## {{diff2|733542926|14:57, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}} "Shameful Never-ending Twitter feuds, which nobody cares but the fandom. Intricate detail for a single fact. OVERSOURCING/OVERDETAILING multiple irrelevant felony charges"
## {{diff2|733543937|15:05, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}} "STOP! relocating this NON-SENSES "I'm a vessel, and God has chosen me to be the voice and the connector.""
## {{diff2|733545215|15:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)}} "UNACCEPTABLE in Misplaced Pages. Advertising, promotional chit chat. My new high-top boots line has a glow in the dark sole....... blah, blah, blah.....This is already becoming ridiculous."

;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
*]
*]
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


;<u>Comments:</u>

Repeated mass removals of sourced content. Massive edit-warring. Attacking edit-summaries. Will not stop. ] ] 16:44, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Yes to the above, I've directed the user to the Talk page several times to no avail. ] (]) 16:54, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

:*I was going to report both users myself - Both users have taken up the entire history with this pathetic warring, Both users have been here since 2011 and 2012 respectively so therefore should know better and should know edit summaries don't count as a talkpage!, Both haven't discussed it at all and therefore should be blocked. –]<sup>]</sup> 17:16, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
::*I was thinking about that point myself but then I chose not to report the second user since s/he was restoring a large chunk of the article. But now I see s/he continued reverting even after this report. It doesn't look good but on the talkpage of the article s/he seems to indicate that s/he doesn't want to revert alone any longer. ] ] 17:35, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
:::*To be totally honest Ajax was '''B'''old, He was '''R'''everted and so he should've then '''D'''iscussed the issue so on a technicality Ajax is at fault however they both edit warred and therefore are as bad as each other, Personally regardless of whether "they said they'll stop" they should be blocked anyway as they've actually taken up 2 pages of wars but that's just my honest opinion. –]<sup>]</sup> 18:08, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
::Again, I'm simply reverting sourced content that's continually being removed, there's nothing contentious about that. I'm not sure why I'd be at fault for it. It'd be nice to have some help protecting the page, is all. ] (]) 17:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
:::No. If it is not clear vandalism there is no exemption under the 3RR rule. By continuing the edit-war you risk getting blocked. ] ] 17:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
*{{AN3|p}} It was either blocks for both editors or page protection. I chose page protection. Further edit warring after protection expires will likely result in blocks. Uninvolved editors keeping an eye on the article and helping to settle disputes or achieve consensus would be appreciated. ] <sup>]</sup> 18:18, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

'''Comment''': From what I've seen of Ajax1995's history, he is keen on removing things on a ] basis and then edit warring over it. He SHOUTS and generally comes across as unpleasant. All of that needs to stop. ] (]) 00:10, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Looking at more of Ajax1995's edits, I don't think it would be unfair to label his editing as ]. He removes some trivia, yes, but he also commonly removes important information and/or leaves parts of an article incoherent. And he will then get defensive about it if you challenge him on it, and we then have something like the edit war you see above. If more than one person reverts him, he is likelier to stop. Once he's done being disruptive at one article, he quickly moves on to the next. I do not think it will be long before this editor is blocked, indefinitely or otherwise. He does not have a good understanding of how this site works. And, ], in addition to what about less problematic edit summaries, he clearly needs to extend that to the subjects of the article, if and edit summary are any indication. If one is putting themselves out there as protecting our BLPs, they should not be badmouthing the BLPs in the edit summaries. ] (]) 00:48, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
:All good points. I've reinforced them on Ajax1995's talk page. --] <sup>]</sup> 02:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:46, 24 December 2024

Noticeboard for edit warring

Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles and content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard Shortcuts Update this page

    This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

    You must notify any user you have reported.

    You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    Additional notes
    • When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
    • The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
    • Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
    • Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.
    Definition of edit warring
    Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
    Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)
    An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.

    Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

    Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.

    Click here to create a new report

    Noticeboard archives
    Administrators' (archives, search)
    348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357
    358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367
    Incidents (archives, search)
    1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164
    1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174
    Edit-warring/3RR (archives, search)
    471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480
    481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490
    Arbitration enforcement (archives)
    327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336
    337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346
    Other links

    User:PaleoFile reported by User:Bowler the Carmine (Result: Warned users)

    Page: Giganotosaurus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: PaleoFile (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:



    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: (regarding another now-dormant edit war on a related page)

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: N/A, did not revert and talked directly to editor instead

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

    Bowler the Carmine | talk 20:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

    User:Pipera reported by User:Paramandyr (Result: Both blocked 48 hours)

    Page: Robert de Quincy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Pipera (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: ,

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

    Comments:

    Pipera has chosen to add grandchildren and great grandchildren to the Robert de Quincy article. I have stated on the article talk page this is unnecessary and off-topic to Robert de Quincy. They have also misrepresented what a source states, which I have also stated on the article talk page.

    Even while filling out this report Pipera has reverted me twice, choosing to add back an unused 1790 source to the Sources section, and readding Robert's grandchildren and great grandchildren. This after being told by user:Ealdgyth(17 December 2024) that WP:AGEMATTERS. Honestly, I don't think Pipera is here to build a community encyclopedia. --Paramandyr (talk) 23:56, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

    content user added to the article.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:44, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
    The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
    I have added the followi9ng:
    Robert married Orabilis, daughter of Nes fitz William, Lord of Leuchars. .
    Orabilis was married three times to Morggán, Earl of Mar and Adam of Fife, as stated in the links provided.
    They had:
    Saer de Quincy (died 1219), married Margaret de Beaumont, daughter of Robert de Beaumont, 3rd Earl of Leicester
    Unknown (daughter) de Quincy married de St Andrew
    Sir Saer I de St Andrew of East Haddon married Matilda de Dyve daughter of Hugh Dyve and Agnes they had issue:
    Robert de St Andrew married Albreda
    James de St Andrew (1228)
    Ralph de St Andrew (1228 - 1278)
    William de St Andrew
    Laurence de St Andrew
    Saer II de St Andrew
    John de St Andrew
    Sir Roger de St Andrew (d before 1249)
    Orabilis and Robert divorced.
    Secondly, he married Eve of Galloway, who was previously married to Walter Barclay. .
    it is alright for the children of Saer de Quincy to be placed on his page here, and not for the children of his sis5ter not to be placed here.
    They are also the grandchildren of the said parents and deserve the right to be placed there as well as the marriages of Roberts first wife and her three husbands as well as the second marriage of Robert her husband.
    I do not think I have broken any rules by adding this to his article supported by the external links provided. Pipera (talk) 00:20, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
    I have posted to the talk page this is also incorrect. Pipera (talk) 00:21, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
    I am not in an edit war, I posted new information which is educationally correct and was removed without any academic argument it was gone. no pre talk on the talk page concerning what was supplied by the person deleting the information.
    They firstly need to raise and entry and then talk and resolve, Pipera (talk) 00:23, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
    I am expanding these articles not rolling them back. I have been editing here since at least the year 2001, I was editing entries for the 9/11 project obituaries for the people that passed in 9/11. Pipera (talk) 00:26, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
    See
    User talk:Paramandyr: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Paramandyr&diff=prev&oldid=1264014635
    Latest revision as of 23:20, 19 December 2024 edit undo thank
    Paramandyr (talk | contribs)
    removed, stay off my talk page
    Tag: Undo Pipera (talk) 00:33, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

    User:2804:14C:BBE7:44CE:B8E5:FEDB:67F5:D84D reported by User:Moscow Connection (Result: Stale; content removed)

    Page: Sigma Boy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: 2804:14C:BBE7:44CE:B8E5:FEDB:67F5:D84D (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:


    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

    Comments:
    If the IP reverts one more time, could someone please block them and revert their nonsensical edit? (Okay, maybe it's not "nonsensical", but it's incorrect.) Moscow Connection (talk) 02:59, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

    User:Napoleonjosephine2020 reported by User:Kline (Result: Blocked 24 hours)

    Page: Lindy Li (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Napoleonjosephine2020 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:



    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Zilch.

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

    Comments:

    Note: I am not involved in this situation whatsoever, just found this in recent changes. Kline • talk • contribs 05:16, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

    The editor whose revisions I am trying to undo publicly attacked the subject as an "opportunistic grifter". No one who uses such inflammatory language should be editing the page of this subject. This is common sense and journalism 101. He is clearly motivated by animus against her and should not be editing her page. Why is this even in question? Napoleonjosephine2020 (talk) 05:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
    @Napoleonjosephine2020
    "This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule." Also, "When reporting a user here, own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first." I am not involved, don't complain to me please. Nothing I can do here. Kline • talk • contribs 05:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
    You reported me because I tried to stop someone from violating Li's page! Why is the saboteur getting a free pass? He's clearly motivated by animus and admitted as much on her talk page. Napoleonjosephine2020 (talk) 05:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
    Did you read my comment? You and the other person will have behavior analyzed and decisions will be made accordingly. I'm not singling you out since I have no idea what's happening, you just happened to start the edit war. Kline • talk • contribs 05:28, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
    Napoleon, I think this is a manifestly unfair characterization of what occurred on my talk page (not yours). Here’s the exchange, for those curious. EncycloDeterminate (talk) 05:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

    User:2601:40:CE00:1590:24F6:A73A:9F20:74C and User:2601:40:CE00:1590:80BC:3313:5A8D:AACE reported by User:Bowler the Carmine (Result: )

    Page: Warburg effect (oncology) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: 2601:40:CE00:1590:24F6:A73A:9F20:74C (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and 2601:40:CE00:1590:80BC:3313:5A8D:AACE (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    4. (second IP)



    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: N/A, did not participate in reverts. Warned first IP on their own talk page

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

    Comments:
    I believe both IPs are the same person. The second IP's first edit is a talk page comment stating I'm not Ravidmurthy, but I am the one who has been doing most of the editing here., and after leaving that and another comment proceeded to make the same reversion (#4 above) as the other IP, a little more than 2 hours after #3. CipherRephic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) was also involved in the edit war, but agreed to stop after being warned and has not broken 3RR. Bowler the Carmine | talk 21:12, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

    Categories: