Misplaced Pages

User talk:Bunchofgrapes: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:21, 4 September 2006 editGeogre (talk | contribs)25,257 edits →Mail← Previous edit Latest revision as of 22:15, 21 July 2024 edit undoCycloneYoris (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers84,057 edits Notification: listing of Unreal Engine technology at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle 
(849 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{not around|1=is lost behind the couch cushions|2=The poor schlub|3=time immemorial}}
'''This is ]' talk page. Click the little tab up there to leave me a new message.'''
]<sup>]</sup> 21:16, 24 April 2008 (UTC)]]


Am I the dead guy or one of the dogs? Back, I'd just be a troublemaker. &mdash;] (]) 21:58, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
----
<small>
''']''' &bull;
''']''' &bull;
''']''' &bull;
''']''' &bull;
''']''' &bull;
''']''' &bull;
''']''' &bull;
''']''' &bull;
''']''' &bull;
''']''' &bull;
''']'''
</small>


*You can't be one of those dogs. They have legs. ] | ] 23:32, 25 April 2008 (UTC).
]
*My guess? The light of the dawn. - ]] 09:25, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
*:ooh, you're good. ]<sup>]</sup> 22:05, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
<br clear="all" />


== Welcome back ==


] Welcome back all my friend to the show that never ends! We’re so glad you could attend - come inside, come inside. ]<sup>]</sup> 23:30, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
:Hey, man. Was just thinking about you. How're you holding up? ] (]) 01:31, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


== EddieSegoura Ban Appeal ==
==Confirm==
For the benefit of the wider world and those such as myself, could you confirm, as seems to be the case, that this has all started because you protected a user talk page? ] 22:51, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
:You would have to ask ]. That is my best guess. It could also be because I am seen as a sympathizer for the well-known abusive admin ]. ;-) &mdash;] (]) 22:54, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
::It is quite poignant to imagine the poor man's disappointment at finding me ''not'' listed on the recall page, yes. Hey, BoG, '''''I''''''ll help you ignore MSTCrow. Watch the space below.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
::You see? That was me ''ignoring'' the user. Am I better at it than Lar, or what? ] | ] 23:30, 21 August 2006 (UTC).


For your information, a discussion has been opened at ] regarding an issue you may be involved in. Your comments are invited. Thank you! For the Arbitration Committee, ] <sup>(]/]/])</sup> 01:20, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
:::Ignoring what now? Look what I made! An article for a ]. And With ALoan AWOL, ''somebody'' needs to copyedit it for me... and fix the glaring errors. &mdash;] (]) 23:34, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
::Why do you have a (new) picture of ] with a caption saying that it's about ]'s company? ] 11:51, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
:::Hmm? No, that's Killigrew with a good dog, surely. Compare ], same guy 15 years younger. See the nose? No ]. What makes you think it's Davenant? Bunch, it's a real purty article, a gem! ] | ] 13:13, 22 August 2006 (UTC).


== Removing suspected sock tag ==


== Everyking's RFA ==
] who some suspect of being a sock of ] has been removing the tag on their userpage that says they are suspected of being a sock. I don't know if they are or not (although they do seem quite similar to RJII). What I want to know is, what is the policy regarding removing such notices? ]] 07:12, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
:I've replied to Irresistible on my page, Grappa. If you have input, all the better. ] | ] 08:09, 22 August 2006 (UTC).
::I agree with what Bish said, Immoveable; those tags are rarely worth fighting over, not until the case is all but proven. I'd neither apply nor fight over even the "suspected" ones unless if I would be very surprised if it wasn't true. &mdash;] (]) 14:50, 22 August 2006 (UTC)


Hi Bunch, it was great to see you edit today, especially as It was a ]. Hope you are here to stay awhile. ] (]) 18:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)


== My art == == Pardon? ==


Responding to your message on my ]: I have no idea what you're talking about. I changed my name from ''United Statesman'' weeks ago; I've sent no e-mails either. ]</sup></span>]] 23:46, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
You do realise that if I had not been stupid to release that into the public domain it would probably be more valuable than an ] ] | ] 22:41, 22 August 2006 (UTC)


==Request for help==
:It reminds me of some really nice flight simulators. From 1992 or so. I faint with delight! &mdash;] (]) 03:30, 23 August 2006 (UTC)


I am will shortly be posting to ] with the request below. Any support would be appreciated.
==Size of London==
Please name one or two of those fine-looking sources. Did you happen to see the figure 80,000 anywhere? Or 300,000? ''Any'' figure? ] | ] 00:04, 23 August 2006 (UTC).
* Sheppard, Francis (1998). ''London: A History''. Oxford University Press. p. 37: "The wall enclosed an area of some 133 hectares (330 acres). This was a far larger area than any other Roman town in Britain..."
* Russo, Daniel G. (1998). ''Town Origins and Development in Early England, c. 400-950 A.D.'' Greenwood Press. p 115: "London was enclosed for the first time by a great stone wall build around the three landward-facing sides of the town (c.200). Constructed of large ragstones, flints, and mortar, with interval towers and gate houses, it stood twenty-one feet high and eight feet thick, enclosing an area of about 330 acres."
:I hadn't looked for population figures; nor (obviously) are these two sources talking about 1666 London. I'll see what I can find later. &mdash;] (]) 01:35, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
::I got nothing. Any population figures are all guesswork anyway (unlike something tangible like the question of area within the Roman Wall), so I'd go with whatever the book in front of you says. If you have two books, and they don't say the same, go with a range. &mdash;] (]) 03:32, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
:::Right. Thank you. Hmmm... "Google books", whazzat? Lessee, any full-view diary of John Evelyn? ! Learn something every day. {{smiley}} ] | ] 13:41, 23 August 2006 (UTC).
:Oh, a person ''could'' look at ] and ], as I have a feeling one of them talked about population growth and cited a source for the population growth from 1630-1690. That would be a ballpark, anyway. </whistles "Lillalullaberoo"> ] 13:43, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
::] cites , from the "Millwall History Files", a site, uh, focusing on "The Story of Millwall Football Club concentrating on the period since Early 1980's". The page is question appears well-done -- I'm not sure if it is original content or taken from elsewhere -- but I can't really call it an RS. &mdash;] (]) 15:33, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
:::Not that seeming 's are particularly R, huh? That's some scandalously out-of-context Pepys-quoting there, isn't it? Why not credit him with inventing the Parmazan cheese, while he's at it? &mdash;] (]) 16:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
::::Colorful Detail, my good man, and merely hinted at, too. Watch me not even even mention how he found on returning after the Fire that the cheese had taken the form of a big subterranean ]. They all broke out their ]s and special Swiss fondue forks. ] | ] 17:46, 23 August 2006 (UTC).
:::::Don't be ridiculous, in October 1667 Pepys had an inspiration and invented the fondue fork. It's how the British nearly defeated the Dutch. &mdash;] (]) 17:54, 23 August 2006 (UTC)


===Request to WP:AN===
==Vandalism==
"I would like to take the article ] to FA. I have already sought input from a number of contributors and have cleared up the issues raised (I am sure there are more). I wrote nearly all of the article using different accounts, as follows:
Ok that. I am behind Auckland university's proxy server. Hence it adds that '.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz' thing . Please do not consider it as vandalism. --] 22:26, 23 August 2006 (UTC)


*]
Could you put my Rfa vote back as well. Thanks --] 22:28, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
*]
:I didn't believe it was intentional vandalism. I will go to the work of putting it back; you should cease editing from behind a strangely misconfigured proxy. &mdash;] (]) 22:31, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
*]
*]
*]


I would like to continue this work but I am frustrated by the zealous activity of ] who keeps making significant reverts, and blocking accounts wherever he suspects the work of a 'banned user'. (Fram claims s/he doesn't understand "the people who feel that content is more important than anything else").
== DYK ==


Can I please be left in peace with the present account to complete this work. 'History of logic' is a flagship article for Misplaced Pages, and is an argument against those enemies who claim that nothing serious can ever be accomplished by the project". ] (]) 09:58, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
{| class="messagebox standard-talk"
|-
|]
|On ], ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ].
|} <!-- ], ] --> --''']''' <nowiki>|</nowiki> ] 06:39, 24 August 2006 (UTC)


== FAR notice ==
:I'm startng to notice that Restoration tennis-court theatre articles, even when on the front page, don't attract much attention. Come on! Nothing's more interesting than a Restoration tennis-court theatre, am I right? Hello? &mdash;] (]) 22:41, 24 August 2006 (UTC)


{{#if:|] has|I have}} nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ]. -- ''']''' (]) 02:37, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
::If you will insist on writing them when people are away... -- ] ] 22:27, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
== File:Bishzilla spin.gif listed for deletion ==
:::Step away from the computer, vacationing citizen! &mdash;] (]) 22:32, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Fdw --> ''']''' <sup><small>]</small></sup> 08:13, 3 July 2011 (UTC)


== Eventualists rule! ==
== My edit summary idea ==
] :)]] ] (]) 04:42, 27 November 2012 (UTC)


==Notice of change==
Thanks for your note on my talk about my offhand comment regarding configuring Preferences so as to prompt for edit summaries when not initially entered. You wrote:
Hello. You are receiving this message because of a to the ] that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the ]. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through ]. Thank you. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
:I'm gonna go ahead and game the system with this reply, then. &mdash;] (]) 17:26, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
::Hehe, good job. Funny man. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 14:31, 6 December 2012 (UTC)


==Happy holidays..==
:The idea has its drawbacks. Take a hypothetical individual that would not have, without this coaxing, entered an edit summary. He'll do one of several things:
: 1. Prodded by the message, he will enter a good edit summary
: 2. He will enter "skjfsda" or the equivalent, and be annoyed.
: 3. He will be so annoyed that he will enter "I hate edit summaries".
: 4.He will be so incredibly annoyed that he won't contribute at all.
:I won't venture to be able to accurately assign probabilities to these outcomes, though I would predict that #1 wouldn't outnumber 2, 3, and 4 combined. 2, 3, and 4 are all bad outcomes, I think. (Especially 3, soon we'd have people slapping warning templates on pages about it, and fighting about whether they can be removed, etc. etc.)


…from the evil twin and her baby hooligan gang. ] '']'' ] 15:13, 25 December 2014 (UTC).]
Having thought about this some, I suppose you are right that my suggestion is not an ''unambiguously'' good idea. Still, I think it could be done in a way that would eliminate 95% of the bad outcomes above. I would set up the "no edit summary warning to read something like this"
<gallery mode=packed heights=80px>
File:Bella Rose.jpg
File:A young seal at Donna Nook - geograph.org.uk - 845239.jpg
File:Panthera tigris altaica 19 - Buffalo Zoo.jpg
File:Juraparc 06-07-2013 - Buffalo and calf.jpg
File:Baby Giraffe at Kilimanjaro Safaris.JPG
File:Arct0040 - Flickr - NOAA Photo Library.jpg
File:Baby elephants in an elephant sancuary 02.JPG
</gallery>


:Kawai! &mdash;] (]) 22:19, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
:''Would you like to enter a short Edit Summary of your contribution to Misplaced Pages?'' (Link to What is this?)
:: '''Yes''' Enter edit summary here:_________________
:: '''No''' Please post my contribution without a summary


== Global account ==
Given these choices, I think the bad outcomes are all unlikely. It will be a lot easier for an "annoyed" user to click "No" than to type in "I hate edit summaries" so option 3 will be unlikely. I also find it unlikely that a serious contributor would forget the contribution rather than have the trouble of merely clicking "No" so option 4 would be unlikely. And vandals would have already had the opportunity to input a garbage edit summary before even hitting this page, so option 2 should also be unlikely (and an edit summary of "xzskdfkjafe" probably presages a contribution of equal value so seeing it might actually be helpful to RC patrollers).


Hi Bunchofgrapes! As a ] I'm involved in the upcoming ] of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see ]). By looking at ], I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on ] and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my ]. Cheers, —]&nbsp;<small>]</small> 11:15, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
And we would then know that a decision not to leave an edit summary was intentional, thereby avoiding RfA opposed based on "only 80% edit summary usage" for long-term contributors who are just a little over-eager to hit "Save Page."


==Eddie again==
Anyway, that's my reaction. But I still don't know where or whether to post the idea to see if it gets any wider support. Thanks for paying attention, anyway. I guess I won't sign that recall petition after all. :) Regards, ] 15:46, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Bunchie, there's a new ban appeal by Eddie Segoura which looks to be going well. I'll wait for your opinion, if you have one, before I jump one way or the other. I was quite impressed by the stubborn disruptiveness of Eddie in the distant past, but they say people can change. Anyway, nobody knows more about it than you. ] &#124; ] 09:49, 18 May 2015 (UTC).
]
:I guess my comments from the 2009 appeal (which I did not actually oppose) still stand. I'm willing to believe there's a decent chance he won't be malicious, and if the community wants to put up with what a pain-in-the-ass he can be is even when he's being good, there's little reason not to give him another shot. A quick look at his edits as WikiBaseballFan actually have me wondering if he hasn't grown up some in the last six years, even. &mdash;] (]) 15:35, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
::So you don't you want to say that on AN, little Bunch? ] &#124; ] 16:30, 18 May 2015 (UTC).
:::OK, OK :-) &mdash;] (]) 16:47, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
:::: Little Bunch welcome in ] even though not editing! Feel free take up invisible residence! Discreet ingress and egress through catflap. ] ] 18:22, 18 May 2015 (UTC).


== ] ==
:That's not a bad idea w/ the Yes/No choice. I think, though, that to eliminate the bad outcomes, you would also need a "don't ask me again" checkbox; otherwise, after the fifth or sixth time you get the confirmation question, the frustration would really start to build up. But saving the "don't ask again state" would be problematic, because we couldn't do it for anons... still, that sort of thing might work. &mdash;] (]) 15:51, 24 August 2006 (UTC)


{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Any idea where one could take this idea to? ANI, village pump, ...? ] 16:06, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691988767 -->
== ] of ] ==
]


The file ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
:One of the village pumps would be most appropriate. Be warned thatthis would take developer time, so unless people agree the benefit is quite significant, it probably won't happen. &mdash;] (]) 16:09, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
<blockquote>Out of project scope.</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
== Vandalism to your userpage ==


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
You'll want to revert your userpage. I almost posted to ANI that there was a problem with anons blocking admins before I figured it must just be some kind of joke. The edit summary was "take that!" ] 16:06, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
:Newyorkbrad, meet ]; EddieSegoua, Newyorkbrad. &mdash;] (]) 16:08, 24 August 2006 (UTC)


Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ], 22:29, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
:Nevermind, already reverted by someone else. I would have reverted it myself but I was under some kind of illusion that I couldn't edit someone else's userpage. ] 16:09, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]


The file ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
== Blocking ] ==
<blockquote>Orphaned map.</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
Well done. He certainly seemed Eddieish to me. He was doing an odd thing I haven't noticed before; creating user pages for impostor/doppleganger accounts that had never been created. ], ], see for August 24, 2006 for the rest of them. The particular account names he made up are somewhat interesting: Dvortygirl is an admin in Wiktionary who did a lot to fend off the Exic*rnt vandal, Wily Mo Peña is a Red Sox player. I guess if we see someone doing this stuff again, we'll know who it is. ] 16:46, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
:He's fascinated with sockpuppet, impersonation, and doppelganger tags of all stripes. I've seen him create accounts with names like those before, but I admit I can't recall him creating userpages for non-existent users before. Perhaps his IP had used up its allocation of new-accounts-per-day already, or perhaps he just thought of a different way to be disruptive. &mdash;] (]) 16:54, 24 August 2006 (UTC)


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
Please stop. If you continue to user page ] pages like you did on ], you ''will'' be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:Test3 (Third level warning) -->
:Wow! I will!? And you're the Queen of England, Eddie. &mdash;] (]) 17:44, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
::Yes, because you're abusing the extra features. You can't block someone just because you're suspicious. Even sysop user can get blocked if they misbehave. What are you trying to accomplish by creating those tagged userpages anyway? ] 18:12, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
:::You're a banned user, Eddie. If I was strongly suspicious when I blocked Nobugs, your vandalism spree immediately after completly confirmed it. You are wasting your own time and ours by continuing to try to edit. &mdash;] (]) 19:18, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
:::Oh, and Eddie - I got your mail (from an account with the EddieSegoura name -- gee, it is you!). It is well past the point of me convincing others that you are not welcome. You are banned by the community, for long-term vandalism and trolling. Read ] for what that means. &mdash;] (]) 19:35, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
::::No I'm not, I will keep editing, whether you like it or not, now just leave me alone. If you continue to fight I will have no choice but to defend myself -- ]


Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ~ ]<sup style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">]</sup> 19:24, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
==anarchism article==


==Please attribute or claim media you uploaded or restored: ]==
:Bunchofgrapes, thanks for your concerns. As far as my edits on ] go, well hardly anyone ever cites their sources on this (or most) talk pages. If you look over the edits you will see this. Also, there are three or four other editors who agree with me on most of my points.


You uploaded or restored , ], but for various reasons did not add an {{tl|information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Misplaced Pages needs information on the '''SPECIFIC''' authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.
:Here are my edits on the '''article''' ]:


If it's entirely your own work, '''please include {{tl|own}} in the relevant source field''', amend the {{tl|information}} added by a third party, '''ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field''', and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an <nowiki>|author=</nowiki> parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers. You can also add <code><nowiki>|claimed=yes</nowiki></code> and an <code><nowiki>|author=</nowiki></code>to the {{tl|media by uploader}} or {{tl|presumed_self}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{tl|information}} where appropriate).
* http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Anarchism&diff=prev&oldid=70457435 - removed a pov statement and my removal remains so apparantly there was concurrence here.
* http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Anarchism&diff=71464921&oldid=71458465 - grammer fix
* http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Anarchism&diff=71465445&oldid=71464921 - link fix - link pointed to other than what was stated.
* http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Anarchism&diff=71474394&oldid=71465445 - referenced addition
* http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Anarchism&diff=71641008&oldid=71640983 - ideology change - no ref
* http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Anarchism&diff=71692203&oldid=71684433 - template concerned same ideology change


If it's not entirely your own work, then please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{tl|own}}, will eventually be listed at ] or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers.
:I only have one edit that should have had a reference but didn't. I apologize, I should have referenced (my ideology change) edit. However, there are many unsourced statements in this article and the large majority of them have not been made by me. Further, innumerable Misplaced Pages articles are teeming with unsourced statements and they, too, have been made by thousands of editors who are not me. I will be more careful in future to source my contributions so you or Ungovernable Force will not think that I don't belong here at Misplaced Pages. I have no control over the ''ticklishness'' of the anarchist editors and don't understand it's relevance. If they are ticklish maybe they should toughen up. So far I have no problem at all with ] or ] and we get along fine. Have a wonderful evening. <span style="padding: 0px; background: white; border: 1px solid; border-color: #0A2060"><font color="#720000">]</font><font color="#00036A">]</font> <font color="#720000">]</font><font color="#00036A">]</font></span> 03:38, 25 August 2006 (UTC)


Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created .
== Green Lantern Vandalism ==


It's okay to remove or strike this message once the issue has been resolved :).
Obviously it's on a daily basis. Is there any background on it? Is it one person, or a group? Is some statement trying to be made? Thanks for any help. ] 03:51, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
:I have no idea; earlier today (ok, yesterday, UTC-wise) was the first time I've come across it. I think I got alerted to it via ]. &mdash;] (]) 03:55, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
::Cool. I've seen it over the past couple of weeks. Just in the past few days has it seem to escalate. If you ever get any background, please let me know. Have a good weekend!] 04:14, 25 August 2006 (UTC)


] (]) 07:54, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
== Did you see this? ==


==Happy New Year==
]. --]] 07:32, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi BOG, I just thought I’d drop by to wish you a prosperous New Year and say it would be nice to see a little more of you around the place. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]</span> ] 21:36, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
:Yep, thanks. A pain-in-the-ass vandal kept recreating it. &mdash;] (]) 14:39, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
:Hi and thanks, Giano. Is everything all fixed around here, then, or are you all still slaving away for the glory of our "betters"? &mdash;] (]) 03:54, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
::Yep, everything’s fixed. The place is a positive Utopia, never been better - Jimbo asks me in for a weekly beer to sound out my views for advice. Glad to see you are still looking in. Have a great 2020. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]</span> ] 00:24, 1 January 2020 (UTC)


== Sicilian Baroque nominated for Featured Article Review ==
==ISP fixed, now...==


I have nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ]. -- ] (]) 00:35, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Now that my ISP is fixed for the time being, I can now give you a proper award. ] 19:37, 25 August 2006 (UTC)


== Featured article review for Restoration Spectacular ==
==Award==


I have nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ]. -- ] (]) 00:48, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};"
|rowspan="2" valign="top" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The da Vinci Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | This is to award your efforts to make Misplaced Pages a better place, and especially for your valued assisstance, patience to me many times. ] 19:37, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
|}


== FAR for Durian ==


I have nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ].<!--Template:FARMessage--> ] <sub> '']''</sub> 17:33, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

== "]" listed at ] ==

]

The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 21#Unreal Engine technology}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <small>]</small> <sup>]</sup> 22:15, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
::Really, you deserve the award. See you around Bunch Of Grapes. ] 19:37, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

== My RfA and your comments about my policy opinions ==

Hi, I feel I did not explain myself well regarding ''polls are evil''. I have replied to your !vote but I dont know if you missed it or not. I wonder if you would mind discussing this further on my RfA talk page so that I can get some more views and discuss our ideas. I have asked other users to chip in to and would be obliged if you could pop in and have your say. Thanks --'''Errant''' <small>]<sup>(])</sup>(])</small> 21:20, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

== Reply ==

''You are still banned, Eddie. The reasons for your ban had nothing to do with sockpuppet tags. You are not welcome to edit. —] ('''talk''')'' 22:12, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
:I still don't agree with that. Only the arbitration committee can impose long-term bans on editors and this never happened. In this case, ] suggested something be done and you come together with other users to talk about me about the redirect pages to ]. Hopefully we can work on this as well. --] 20:51, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
::Wrong. Go read ]. "'''Decision to Ban'''. Source 1: The Misplaced Pages community, taking decisions according to appropriate community-designed policies with consensus support, or (more rarely) following consensus on the case itself.". If you want to ''appeal'' your ban, you may do so by contacting the Arbitatration Committee or Jimbo Wales. Good luck with that. &mdash;] (]) 22:55, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

== ] ==

I decided to go along with the ] on that MFD; I felt it was better to do this. I don't want to get into arguments with anyone here! --] 23:13, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
:I hope you were at least partly swayed by the reasoning behind the discussion. If you still feel you are right, you shouldn't change your stance, but try one more time to explain your reasoning. &mdash;] (]) 23:22, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
::I was partly swayed by the reasoning, yes; and I don't want to upset other Wikipedians, either. Anyway, you ''are'' a good admin; you've dealt better than me with the EddieSegoura situation! --] 23:42, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
:::Thanks, M62, I really appreciate that! &mdash;] (]) 23:52, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
::::Glad you like it. See the ] thread on EddieSegoura; I have a solution regarding ] trolling. --] 23:57, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
:::::Somehow I doubt moving it to BJAODN would really solve it. &mdash;] (]) 23:59, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
A misguided attempt by me to solve it, but I did try! Anyhow... keep up the good work! --] 00:00, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
:... Maybe you're a genius, M62. &mdash;] (]) 04:18, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
::I decided it should be deleted from here, I can't see a reason to keep it. --] 22:39, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
:::Decided ''what'' should be deleted? ], or the content added in that edit in BJAODN I linked to there? &mdash;] (]) 22:45, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
:::The LTA page itself; I think the WoW page is redudnant now. --] 23:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
::::Oh, OK. Glad to hear it! &mdash;] (]) 23:11, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

== ] ==

I was also confused by those two edits on ]. My guess was an alternate user account? I left a message on both accounts' talk pages... —] (]) 03:19, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

== lmao ==

You are the newest addition to my amusing quotes on my userpage (from ANI about Courtney). Cheers! ] 12:29, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
:Exxxxxcellent. Glad to see my juvenile humor didn't go unappreciated. &mdash;] (]) 14:46, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
::Linkie? Inquiring (and lazy) people want to know. So far my mentorship has been uneventful :) ++]: ]/] 15:29, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
:::You could just go look at Syrthiss' user page. The funny bit was in . I was by coincidence just now checking up on how that mentoring was going --- yeah, uneventful. &mdash;] (]) 15:32, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
::::SAID I was lazy! ++]: ]/] 18:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

== Cookie ==

{{award2|image=Choco chip cookie.jpg|size=150px|topic=Administrative cookie|text=For your outstanding efforts in eliminating the backlog at WP:AIV, I, ], award you a ''']'''.--] 04:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC)}}
:I take orders well, once in a while. &mdash;] (]) 04:09, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

==Drive-by recall==
Drive-by recall is over? I think of recall as a lazy man's RFC. One user makes a request and then walks away with out needing to write out a formal request and get it certified. Makes other people organize the thing. Do you know if there were others after yours that I missed? ] 22:36, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
:No, there weren't -- I remain the first and only recall "survivor", at least that I know of. Not that it would have bothered me to re-RfA... if the thought of that bothered me, ''I wouldn't be in the category'' :-) Probably a recall done in such a lazy a manner as this one doesn't have much chance of success, anyway, so the drive-by factor is mitigated. And let's face it, the two recalls we've had so far have both been a lot more collegial than a typical user RfC. FWIW, MSTCrow did, a couple days later, come back and offer up the two crimes I had committed, one ex post facto... the whole thing is preserved ]. &mdash;] (]) 22:50, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

==Good one==
. Good. ] | ] 09:38, 30 August 2006 (UTC).
:Soon we'll be wearing gold-plated diapers. That image, even though it is fair-use, is one of Misplaced Pages's two most essential. The other -- need I even say? -- is of course ]. &mdash;] (]) 14:57, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

==]==
This case is now closed and the result has been published at the link above.

{{user5|Eternal Equinox}} is placed on ] and personal attack parole for one year.

{{user5|Jim62sch}} is cautioned to avoid teasing or taunting sensitive users.

For the Arbitration Committee. --] 13:34, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

== Reporting Vandalism by Ambystom01 ==

The only edits that '''Ambystom01''' seems to have done were all vandalism about this ] nonsense. See ]. Since you reverted the user's ] nonsense, I think it appropriate that you add another warning on the ]. ] added the comments for me after I reverted the vandalism on ].

My apologies if I am stepping on some etiquette here; I'm still learning the ropes.

TIA -- ] <sup>]</sup> 14:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
:I think they have gotten enough warnings -- I've blocked them. Thanks. &mdash;] (]) 14:44, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
::Thanks. I wouldn't have taken it upon myself to make that call, but I agree. I guess that's what separates administrators from newbies! -- ] 10:01, 1 September 2006 (UTC) <small>Must have timed out before I committed the changes. It was me. :) -- ] <sup>]</sup> 10:04, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

== Axiomm ==

Saw your RFCU regarding this user and remembered seeing the name before. Here's a from Consumed Crustacean's RFA where Quarl brings up some other oddities regarding Axiomm. I didn't know if you wanted to add that or not to your RFCU. Do you think I should bring this up on the talk of Carnildo's RFA as well (as Axiomm has participated) or wait for results? ] 16:02, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
:I added a note to the RfA. And to the RFCU. Thanks. &mdash;] (]) 16:10, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
::Sheesh. I didn't know I was dealing with Eddie (it's been a while for sure). I should've guessed with ] though. &ndash; ]] 16:11, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
:::Yup :-) Lucky you, NSL..Chacor, I wish it had been a while for me. Did you know you had him with ] and the ] moves too? &mdash;] (]) 16:16, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
::::I sorta figured after a while. It has indeed been a while, I guess I'll just have to keep an eye out then. &ndash; ]] 16:19, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

== ] ==

Just to let you know. ] 22:37, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
:Deleted; thanks. &mdash;] (]) 22:42, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

== Sorry ==

I don't know where I got that impression that you hadn't talked to Kylu. I struck my comment. ] 15:36, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
:I saw. Thank you :-) &mdash;] (]) 15:37, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

==I'd like your advice==

You've stepped into the quagmire of the ] articles before: perhaps you've seen my reporting ] on WP:AN3 ] and WP:AN/I ], both cases so subtle that no admin has wet their toes in them. That's the problem. DTC is, in my estimation, the most dangerous type of disruption we can have on Wiki: a dedicated, single-minded user with a lot of free time and a volumnious library of printed sources all in service of a partisan POV. He's too smart to do something obviously vandalistic (even his 3RR violation wasn't obvious, but is clear upon reflection if one compares the first and last versions he reverts to) and can play at all the weaknesses of something like Misplaced Pages, especially the difficulty of recognising non-obvious vandalism. His edit-warring, excarbated by the well-intended efforts of an uninterested administration (another Wiki weakness) has driven off ]. He's almost certainly a RJII sockpuppet - I suspect ] is the same guy as well. I want him to stop aggressively misrepresenting sources, loading the article with ones amiable to his view and dismissing or stripping those not. I've tried to play nice, but he brushes it off - I've tried to bring this through the proper channels, but nobody wants to give the case the attention it deserves: what am I supposed to do? --]<sup>]</sup> 05:52, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
:First, let me again emphasisize, as I did with TheUngovernableForce, that I have no idea at all about the content question here and for all I know the pro-anarcho-capitalist sides are right and the topic *is* under-represented or belittled. Or not. How would I know? Other than the obvious approaches like suggesting a CheckUser or compiling enough evidence to go to ArbCom, the only thing I can really suggest is that you make sure everything your side asserts is backed by scholarly sources too. If one side is arguing backed by a voluminous library, and the other is backed by -- for example -- talking about what the Expedia article on Anarchism says, the guy with the library probably ''should'' win. Of course, ideally, you wouldn't have sides, you'd all be doing your best to fairly cover all aspects of the topic as best you could... but it's a politics article, and I suppose people interested in politics articles are inherently political, aren't they? Ugh. &mdash;] (]) 15:18, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
::This isn't about the content dispute, though you can imagine the trouble I have convincing people of that. My problem is that he strips the article of scholarly sources of the opposing view as much as he can. He unilaterally acts in a way misrepresenting these sources. Then he claims his view is the scholarly consensus, when it is not - it is a highly disputed view, and if there is a meaningful consensus any way it is opposite to his view. I don't now have the access to the type of specialised library he does, nor do I have the time to devote to cheerleading my favourite ideology: look at ] - it's ''all that he has done''. I find it ''very'' worrying that the only way to stop people like this is if they do something stupid - if That'sHot is his sockpuppet. And when they wise up - this kid is already smart enough to make his edits appear legitimate to the uninterested viewer - what do we do then? --]<sup>]</sup> 01:42, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

==London, England==
I noticed your rollback on ] - I had noticed a similar edit on ]. I think someone with one of those changing IPs has been going through ] or a related category - look at . -- ] ] 17:04, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
:Oy. Adding the context on *some* of those pages seems OK to my American eye, and on others, stupid overkill -- how I hate those who go through making sweeping changes. &mdash;] (]) 17:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

== BoG Hi! ==

Good evening BoG, or is it morning? Just looked in to see what is new Amazing what you can delete from your page and I can't? I'm almost "disappointed" ] | ] 23:06, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

== Request for admin attention ==

I'm requesting some Misplaced Pages administrators to communicate with a user, Aeusoes1, who is causing some problems for the ] article. Please look at the article's talk page, section "Edits by AEuSoes1", especially "Edit 3". If it's appropriate, in your opinion, please consider a temporary block for that user. Otherwise, perhaps you can reason with him. Thanks. ] 16:46, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

== ] ==

I've been attempting to edit this article, per ], and ] keeps reverting without stated cause. Whilst I'll acknowledge possible counterarguments to my reasoning to remove what I've removed, I have provided what seem to me to be quite plausible and policy-based arguments. Further, I have repeatedly, over the course of several days, attempted directly to contact this user: ]. In response, as noted, I've seen absolutely no response save the reverts noted in the UE article talk page section. This doesn't seem worthy of ] yet. How should I proceed? ] 17:25, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
:I have left him a message and put the page on my watchlist. &mdash;] (]) 21:04, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
::Thanks. It appears to have been thus far successful. ] 20:18, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

== wrong address ==

Today I recieved this message:

"All right, stop bothering people with inane questions or comments on their talk pages please. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 02:57, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Misplaced Pages. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.
Geogre 02:58, 12 July 2006 (UTC)"

You must be confusing me with someone else, as I have never participated on this site's message boards.

] 18:21, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

:That was at ], right? As the message in the big box on that talk page says, "This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users." So don't worry about it. &mdash;] (]) 20:57, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

== CSICOP etc. ==

Thanks for the comments; that was very helpful, particularly the distinction between calling for assistance with ] and ] issues. I particularly like your suggestion that the parties agree that both WikiProjects be notified of future requests for more editors. I will make that suggestion to the participants at some point, when (if!) things cool down a bit. Thanks. ] ] 02:55, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

== Re ] ==

: ''You don't appear to be the author?... nor do I understand why that isn't a useful redirect...
Oops &ndash; apologies for mistake and thanks for spotting! &nbsp;Best wishes, ] 03:44, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

== IP address ==

OK. Thanks for the information.] 04:51, 3 September 2006 (UTC)


== Mail ==

Do you have a problem? ] 18:11, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
:Probably. Anything specific you have in mind? I don't seem to have any mail. (My idiot email provider seems more than willing to randomly filter out real messages, though, so that doesn't seem to mean much lately :-( )&mdash;] (]) 18:17, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
*Send me an e-mail, and all your e-mail woes can be banishéd. ] 11:21, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

== An invitation ==

I noticed before that you live in Oregon and wanted to send you this to consider ]. I know it is a long trip for a kind of low-key get together, and it is by now short notice, but you would certainly be welcome. ]+] 21:10, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

== Giano blocking controversy ==

I just wanted to say that, although I supported Kylu's block and disagreed with your unblocking, I'm now worried that you may be bruised by the experience of the last few days. I don't think I said anything actually uncivil, but I do apologise if anything seemed harsh - obviously you acted in good faith, believed you were doing the right thing, and had quite a lot of support. This hasn't been easy. It's a pity that so many good people have suffered grief over this mess. Hopefully, it will soon be confirmed that Carnildo's latest RfA has failed, and that will be the end of it. ] 01:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

*I don't know if I actually said it, or thought I said it, but I agreed with your unblocking ''for the reasons stated.'' In other words, you did the hard stuff of researching the timing, and I think you were right to indict Kylu's block. I haven't the vaguest idea whether Kylu had bad intent or not, and I don't think you said, either, but you were right that the timing was suspicious and poor enough that the block itself was a clear lift. I was on my "let's not say anything" approach, though, hoping that silence would be an example for the world. It wasn't. (The avant garde band ] broke up, they said, because there are too many bands in the world. They said that therefore they would lead by example. However, none of the other bands broke up, so they reformed.) ] 11:20, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:15, 21 July 2024

This user is lost behind the couch cushions. The poor schlub has not edited Misplaced Pages since time immemorial. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.
Bunch, are you lost to us forever? KillerChihuahua 21:16, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Am I the dead guy or one of the dogs? Back, I'd just be a troublemaker. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 21:58, 25 April 2008 (UTC)


Welcome back

We Must Let the Show Go On

Welcome back all my friend to the show that never ends! We’re so glad you could attend - come inside, come inside. KillerChihuahua 23:30, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey, man. Was just thinking about you. How're you holding up? DS (talk) 01:31, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

EddieSegoura Ban Appeal

For your information, a discussion has been opened at WP:AN#EddieSegoura Ban Appeal regarding an issue you may be involved in. Your comments are invited. Thank you! For the Arbitration Committee, Hersfold 01:20, 22 April 2009 (UTC)


Everyking's RFA

Hi Bunch, it was great to see you edit today, especially as It was a wise and great edit. Hope you are here to stay awhile. Giano (talk) 18:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Pardon?

Responding to your message on my talk page: I have no idea what you're talking about. I changed my name from United Statesman weeks ago; I've sent no e-mails either. B R U N S W I C K I A N 23:46, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Request for help

I am will shortly be posting to WP:AN with the request below. Any support would be appreciated.

Request to WP:AN

"I would like to take the article History of logic to FA. I have already sought input from a number of contributors and have cleared up the issues raised (I am sure there are more). I wrote nearly all of the article using different accounts, as follows:

I would like to continue this work but I am frustrated by the zealous activity of User:Fram who keeps making significant reverts, and blocking accounts wherever he suspects the work of a 'banned user'. (Fram claims s/he doesn't understand "the people who feel that content is more important than anything else").

Can I please be left in peace with the present account to complete this work. 'History of logic' is a flagship article for Misplaced Pages, and is an argument against those enemies who claim that nothing serious can ever be accomplished by the project". Logic Historian (talk) 09:58, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

FAR notice

I have nominated Simon Byrne for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. -- Cirt (talk) 02:37, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Bishzilla spin.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bishzilla spin.gif, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILYs 08:13, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Eventualists rule!

Eventualists rule, Take a look :)

Djembayz (talk) 04:42, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

I'm gonna go ahead and game the system with this reply, then. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 17:26, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Hehe, good job. Funny man. MBisanz 14:31, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Happy holidays..

…from the evil twin and her baby hooligan gang. darwinbish ☠ 15:13, 25 December 2014 (UTC).

Kawai! —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 22:19, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Global account

Hi Bunchofgrapes! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:15, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Eddie again

Bunchie, there's a new ban appeal by Eddie Segoura here on AN which looks to be going well. I'll wait for your opinion, if you have one, before I jump one way or the other. I was quite impressed by the stubborn disruptiveness of Eddie in the distant past, but they say people can change. Anyway, nobody knows more about it than you. Bishonen | talk 09:49, 18 May 2015 (UTC).

I guess my comments from the 2009 appeal (which I did not actually oppose) still stand. I'm willing to believe there's a decent chance he won't be malicious, and if the community wants to put up with what a pain-in-the-ass he can be is even when he's being good, there's little reason not to give him another shot. A quick look at his edits as WikiBaseballFan actually have me wondering if he hasn't grown up some in the last six years, even. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 15:35, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
So you don't you want to say that on AN, little Bunch? Bishonen | talk 16:30, 18 May 2015 (UTC).
OK, OK :-) —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 16:47, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Little Bunch welcome in pocket even though not editing! Feel free take up invisible residence! Discreet ingress and egress through catflap. bishzilla ROARR!! 18:22, 18 May 2015 (UTC).

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Mona bisha.png

The file File:Mona bisha.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. XXN, 22:29, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Drury lane theatre map.svg

The file File:Drury lane theatre map.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13 19:24, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Please attribute or claim media you uploaded or restored: File:Tulipface spin.gif

You uploaded or restored , File:Tulipface spin.gif, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Misplaced Pages needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.

If it's entirely your own work, please include {{own}} in the relevant source field, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers. You can also add |claimed=yes and an |author=to the {{media by uploader}} or {{presumed_self}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

If it's not entirely your own work, then please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{own}}, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers.

Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

It's okay to remove or strike this message once the issue has been resolved :).

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:54, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Happy New Year

Hi BOG, I just thought I’d drop by to wish you a prosperous New Year and say it would be nice to see a little more of you around the place. Giano (talk) 21:36, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi and thanks, Giano. Is everything all fixed around here, then, or are you all still slaving away for the glory of our "betters"? —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 03:54, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Yep, everything’s fixed. The place is a positive Utopia, never been better - Jimbo asks me in for a weekly beer to sound out my views for advice. Glad to see you are still looking in. Have a great 2020. Giano (talk) 00:24, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Sicilian Baroque nominated for Featured Article Review

I have nominated Sicilian Baroque for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. -- Beland (talk) 00:35, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Featured article review for Restoration Spectacular

I have nominated Restoration Spectacular for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. -- Beland (talk) 00:48, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

FAR for Durian

I have nominated Durian for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 17:33, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

"Unreal Engine technology" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Unreal Engine technology has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 21 § Unreal Engine technology until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris 22:15, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Categories: