Talk:Depend (undergarment): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 21:41, 4 September 2006 editMike Halterman (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users22,259 edits →Not funny if you have medical problems....← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 13:55, 12 February 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk \| contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,268 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion
(19 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Old AfD multi\| date = 13 May 2012 \| result = '''keep''' \| page = Depend }}
			{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=C\|
			{{WikiProject Brands\|importance=low}}
			{{WikiProject Medicine\|importance=low}}
			{{WikiProject United States\|importance=low}}
			}}

			==Untitled comment==
	This reads almost like a sales pamphlet that I had to google a line from it just to make sure it wasn't copied from somewhere. (The only hit that turned up was clearly taken from this article, so it seems it's not a copyvio at least.) It ''is'' informative, I just think the tone of the article needs a little work. - ] (]) 03:01, 16 November 2005 (UTC)		This reads almost like a sales pamphlet that I had to google a line from it just to make sure it wasn't copied from somewhere. (The only hit that turned up was clearly taken from this article, so it seems it's not a copyvio at least.) It ''is'' informative, I just think the tone of the article needs a little work. - ] (]) 03:01, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

	:I cleaned it up just a little by removing sentence fragments, for example, "Ideal for X" becomes "They are ideal for X". However, the text gets repetitive this way ("They are this, they are that..."), so it needs to be rewritten further. Also, the article needs to be consistent about "it" versus "they" when referring to a particular item ("It does have perforated sides" versus "They do have perforated sides"). - ] (]) 03:09, 16 November 2005 (UTC)		:I cleaned it up just a little by removing sentence fragments, for example, "Ideal for X" becomes "They are ideal for X". However, the text gets repetitive this way ("They are this, they are that..."), so it needs to be rewritten further. Also, the article needs to be consistent about "it" versus "they" when referring to a particular item ("It does have perforated sides" versus "They do have perforated sides"). - ] (]) 03:09, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

			== Semi-protection ==
	====Ha====

	Very funny article. A little pro-depend if you ask me.
	(bit of a waste of kilobytes). ] 00:51, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

	===Not funny if you have medical problems....===

	I'm glad that "theonlyedge" finds victims incontinence funny. I bet he thinks quadriplegics are riot. When you're in your 20s and suddenly start bleeding from your small intestine, it's not very amusing.

	Trying to figure out what an incontinence product is like when you're faced with a wide variety from each company and they're often discussed (even on the packaging) in such euphemistic terms that you have no idea what is actually in the package. I've wasted several hundred dollars purchasing useless products.

	On 22 and 23Feb05, I made some major edits to remove personal jokes (again, people seem to have no understanding that incontinence is not a joke, it's a horrible condition to live with) placed in the document by 65.40.195.23, correct mistakes in the product descriptions, and remove uses for which incontinence products are not really needed. Sorry, but you don't need adult diapers for menstruation or a "wet dream". Find me a doctor who says you do and I'll put it back.

			I would like to request semi-protection for this article. Many page-blanking vandalisms have occurred.
	I may add links to other product brands later so this seems less commercial. It seems I have to write them myself, and I don't have the time right now.

			== Name ==
	This _is_ a useful page to a lot of people.

			As I can remember, that brand used to be called ''Depends''. I wonder when it was renamed to ''Depend''. --] <small>—Preceding ] was added at 04:36, 16 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

			== Edited ==
	Funny or not (its not), calling something an excellent choice for a teenage bedwetters is not npov-should say often used or something like that (referenced too)- Im too lazy to research the Depends page though ] 22:24, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
			I've removed the excessive descriptions unnecessary for an encyclopedic article. A basic run-down of the available products, with a brief outline of the design and intended usage is sufficient. This is NOT the place to go into details of leakguards and comparisons to other products, for eg. Before there's a slew of complaints that removing such info is discriminatory against the afflicted, balence the common sense. It is absurd to pretend that fetishism does not influence otherwise straightforward entries: basic information starts to morphs into lavish copy and user guides, and this article had been duly done. There are plenty of sites and links to provide the rest of it. PS. So why am ''I'' here? I'm a RN :) ] (]) 19:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

			== Depends ==
	What year was '''Depend''' introduced? --]

			Count on your life with Depends!! <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 21:47, 6 September 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	:1980. I will add it to the article. ] ] 21:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:55, 12 February 2024

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 May 2012. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled comment

This reads almost like a sales pamphlet that I had to google a line from it just to make sure it wasn't copied from somewhere. (The only hit that turned up was clearly taken from this article, so it seems it's not a copyvio at least.) It is informative, I just think the tone of the article needs a little work. - furrykef (Talk at me) 03:01, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

I cleaned it up just a little by removing sentence fragments, for example, "Ideal for X" becomes "They are ideal for X". However, the text gets repetitive this way ("They are this, they are that..."), so it needs to be rewritten further. Also, the article needs to be consistent about "it" versus "they" when referring to a particular item ("It does have perforated sides" versus "They do have perforated sides"). - furrykef (Talk at me) 03:09, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

Semi-protection

I would like to request semi-protection for this article. Many page-blanking vandalisms have occurred.

Name

As I can remember, that brand used to be called Depends. I wonder when it was renamed to Depend. --PJ Pete —Preceding comment was added at 04:36, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Edited

I've removed the excessive descriptions unnecessary for an encyclopedic article. A basic run-down of the available products, with a brief outline of the design and intended usage is sufficient. This is NOT the place to go into details of leakguards and comparisons to other products, for eg. Before there's a slew of complaints that removing such info is discriminatory against the afflicted, balence the common sense. It is absurd to pretend that fetishism does not influence otherwise straightforward entries: basic information starts to morphs into lavish copy and user guides, and this article had been duly done. There are plenty of sites and links to provide the rest of it. PS. So why am I here? I'm a RN :) Plutonium27 (talk) 19:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Depends

Count on your life with Depends!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.91.229.5 (talk) 21:47, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Categories: