| Revision as of 08:10, 5 September 2006 editJzG (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers155,070 edits →[]: more← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:59, 31 January 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Added missing end tags to discussion close footer to reduce Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|Category}} | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''keep'''. - ]''']'''] 03:42, 10 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| Not notable. Pastor at a church, and books of unknown/questionable publishing. This was nominated before in Jan. 2005, but was never closed. Someone seriously tamperred with the AfD process in and it was never closed or debated, view ] for details. The thechurchreport.com lists him as influential, but searching "thechurchreport.com" at yahoo I get 40 hits. He fails ]. ] 01:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC) | Not notable. Pastor at a church, and books of unknown/questionable publishing. This was nominated before in Jan. 2005, but was never closed. Someone seriously tamperred with the AfD process in and it was never closed or debated, view ] for details. The thechurchreport.com lists him as influential, but searching "thechurchreport.com" at yahoo I get 40 hits. He fails ]. ] 01:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Line 7: | Line 14: | ||
| :'''Note''': nominator Arbustoo improperly deleted the vote by {{user|205.157.110.11}} with the following summary "rv this IP that has hit every single one of my AfDs and ONLY my AfDs", however, user 205.157.110.11 has participated in a number of AfDs not nominated by Arbustoo, so that accusation is baseless and without merit. In any case, the proper thing to do would not be to delete the users vote and comment, but rather make a comment under his vote suggesting that he is only voting to spite Arbustoo, if that is what Arbustoo seems to be claiming by his deletion. ] (]) 07:54, 5 September 2006 (UTC) | :'''Note''': nominator Arbustoo improperly deleted the vote by {{user|205.157.110.11}} with the following summary "rv this IP that has hit every single one of my AfDs and ONLY my AfDs", however, user 205.157.110.11 has participated in a number of AfDs not nominated by Arbustoo, so that accusation is baseless and without merit. In any case, the proper thing to do would not be to delete the users vote and comment, but rather make a comment under his vote suggesting that he is only voting to spite Arbustoo, if that is what Arbustoo seems to be claiming by his deletion. ] (]) 07:54, 5 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Delete''' generic evangelical minister, or '''merge''' to his father, who appears to be the primary source of his supposed influence. Significance is apparently established primarily by reference to redlinked organisations. This should have been deleted at the first AfD, where only ] voted keep, but it was never closed. <b>]</b> 08:09, 5 September 2006 (UTC) | * '''Delete''' generic evangelical minister, or '''merge''' to his father, who appears to be the primary source of his supposed influence. Significance is apparently established primarily by reference to redlinked organisations. This should have been deleted at the first AfD, where only ] voted keep, but it was never closed. <b>]</b> 08:09, 5 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Strong keep''', with publisher that is acquired by major house and his books are subject to translation. That doesn't happen to non-notable authors. - ]|] 08:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Keep''', books are sold in significant numbers on Amazon used&new and receive quite a number of good reviews by readers . --] 09:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Keep''' per the above comments. ] 18:45, 5 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Keep''' per above. ] 19:05, 5 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Keep''' as pssing ]. Books with independent reviews, and respectably rank in the low thousandsths per Amazon. ] 01:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Keep''' per if this were anyone else it wouldn't have been nominated.-] 08:04, 7 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 05:59, 31 January 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 03:42, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Andy Stanley
Not notable. Pastor at a church, and books of unknown/questionable publishing. This was nominated before in Jan. 2005, but was never closed. Someone seriously tamperred with the AfD process in and it was never closed or debated, view Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Andy Stanley for details. The thechurchreport.com lists him as influential, but searching "thechurchreport.com" at yahoo I get 40 hits. He fails WP:BIO. Arbusto 01:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - Despite the odd past AfD, the publishing company for his books has been acquired by Random House, and he has appeared/spoken at high profile churches such as Willow Creek Community Church. Crystallina 02:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - About 70,000 google hits for pastor "andy stanley", about 45 (not sure I counted exactly) editions on Amazon.com including translations of English titles into Spanish. The existence of translations and a standard publishing house would appear to be some evidence his books have substantial reach. --Shirahadasha 04:14, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Keep His influence is tied squarely to the coat tails from his pappy, which in the Evangelical world the name "Stanley" has big sway. 205.157.110.11 07:08, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Note: nominator Arbustoo improperly deleted the vote by 205.157.110.11 (talk · contribs) with the following summary "rv this IP that has hit every single one of my AfDs and ONLY my AfDs", however, user 205.157.110.11 has participated in a number of AfDs not nominated by Arbustoo, so that accusation is baseless and without merit. In any case, the proper thing to do would not be to delete the users vote and comment, but rather make a comment under his vote suggesting that he is only voting to spite Arbustoo, if that is what Arbustoo seems to be claiming by his deletion. Vivaldi (talk) 07:54, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete generic evangelical minister, or merge to his father, who appears to be the primary source of his supposed influence. Significance is apparently established primarily by reference to redlinked organisations. This should have been deleted at the first AfD, where only brand new users voted keep, but it was never closed. Guy 08:09, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Strong keep, with publisher that is acquired by major house and his books are subject to translation. That doesn't happen to non-notable authors. - Mgm| 08:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, books are sold in significant numbers on Amazon used&new and receive quite a number of good reviews by readers . --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 09:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per the above comments. RFerreira 18:45, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per above. Michael 19:05, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep as pssing WP:BIO. Books with independent reviews, and respectably rank in the low thousandsths per Amazon. Ohconfucius 01:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per if this were anyone else it wouldn't have been nominated.-Kmaguir1 08:04, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.