Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Andy Stanley (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:23, 5 September 2006 editMacGyverMagic (talk | contribs)44,753 edits []← Previous edit Latest revision as of 05:59, 31 January 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Added missing end tags to discussion close footer to reduce Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(10 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|Category}}
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''keep'''. - ]''']'''] 03:42, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

===]=== ===]===
Not notable. Pastor at a church, and books of unknown/questionable publishing. This was nominated before in Jan. 2005, but was never closed. Someone seriously tamperred with the AfD process in and it was never closed or debated, view ] for details. The thechurchreport.com lists him as influential, but searching "thechurchreport.com" at yahoo I get 40 hits. He fails ]. ] 01:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC) Not notable. Pastor at a church, and books of unknown/questionable publishing. This was nominated before in Jan. 2005, but was never closed. Someone seriously tamperred with the AfD process in and it was never closed or debated, view ] for details. The thechurchreport.com lists him as influential, but searching "thechurchreport.com" at yahoo I get 40 hits. He fails ]. ] 01:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Line 8: Line 15:
* '''Delete''' generic evangelical minister, or '''merge''' to his father, who appears to be the primary source of his supposed influence. Significance is apparently established primarily by reference to redlinked organisations. This should have been deleted at the first AfD, where only ] voted keep, but it was never closed. <b>]</b> 08:09, 5 September 2006 (UTC) * '''Delete''' generic evangelical minister, or '''merge''' to his father, who appears to be the primary source of his supposed influence. Significance is apparently established primarily by reference to redlinked organisations. This should have been deleted at the first AfD, where only ] voted keep, but it was never closed. <b>]</b> 08:09, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''Strong keep''', with publisher that is acquired by major house and his books are subject to translation. That doesn't happen to non-notable authors. - ]|] 08:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC) *'''Strong keep''', with publisher that is acquired by major house and his books are subject to translation. That doesn't happen to non-notable authors. - ]|] 08:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''', books are sold in significant numbers on Amazon used&new and receive quite a number of good reviews by readers . --] 09:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' per the above comments. ] 18:45, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' per above. ] 19:05, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' as pssing ]. Books with independent reviews, and respectably rank in the low thousandsths per Amazon. ] 01:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' per if this were anyone else it wouldn't have been nominated.-] 08:04, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 05:59, 31 January 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 03:42, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Andy Stanley

Not notable. Pastor at a church, and books of unknown/questionable publishing. This was nominated before in Jan. 2005, but was never closed. Someone seriously tamperred with the AfD process in and it was never closed or debated, view Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Andy Stanley for details. The thechurchreport.com lists him as influential, but searching "thechurchreport.com" at yahoo I get 40 hits. He fails WP:BIO. Arbusto 01:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Note: nominator Arbustoo improperly deleted the vote by 205.157.110.11 (talk · contribs) with the following summary "rv this IP that has hit every single one of my AfDs and ONLY my AfDs", however, user 205.157.110.11 has participated in a number of AfDs not nominated by Arbustoo, so that accusation is baseless and without merit. In any case, the proper thing to do would not be to delete the users vote and comment, but rather make a comment under his vote suggesting that he is only voting to spite Arbustoo, if that is what Arbustoo seems to be claiming by his deletion. Vivaldi (talk) 07:54, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.