Misplaced Pages

History of Christianity in Ukraine: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:46, 5 September 2006 editPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers285,769 edits Union of Brest and its aftermath: few ilinks← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:02, 31 August 2024 edit undoStarkReport (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,323 edits Modern times: Citation for Yushchenko politics. 
(779 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|none}}
: ''This article should ] material from ], ], ], ], and ].''
{{update|date=December 2018}}
{|style="float: right;"
<!--: ''This article should ] material from
|-
],
|] of ], set in the golden diadem presented by ].]]
],
|-
],
|{{Eastern Christianity}}
],
], and
].''-->
{|style="float: right;"
|-
|{{Christianity by country}}<!--commented out because this article isn't just about Eastern Christianity {{Eastern Christianity|width=235}}-->
|} |}
The '''history of Christianity in Ukraine''' dates back to the earliest centuries of the ], to the ], with mission trips along the ] and a legend of ] even ascending the ]. The first Christian community on territory of modern Ukraine is documented as early as the 4th century with the establishment of the ], which was centered in the ]. However, on territory of the Old Rus in ], Christianity became the dominant religion since its official acceptance in 989 by ] (Volodymyr the Great), who brought it from Byzantine ] and installed it as the ] of medieval ] (]), with the ] in Kiev.


Although separated into various ]s, most ] Christians share a common faith based on ]. This tradition is represented in Ukraine by the ], the ] and ] churches, which have been at various historic times closely aligned with Ukrainian national self-identity and ].
The religious '''History of Christianity in Ukraine''' dates to the earliest centuries of the apostolic church when, according to legend, it was preached by ] in parts of the modern territory of ].


Being officially eliminated since the end of ], the recent revival of Ukrainian national religions started just before ] in 1989 with reestablishment of the ] which also triggered recovery of the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church movement out of diaspora and transition of the former Russian Orthodox Church clergy who were native Ukrainians. Today, there are three national Ukrainian churches: the ], the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, and the ]. Additionally, there is a smaller number of Byzantine rite adherents in the ] who were dominated by the ] in the past. ] bodies including the ] of the ] and several Protestant denominations have had a limited presence on the territory of Ukraine since at least the 16th century and represent a minority of Christians in the country.
==Dominant role of Byzantine Christianity established==
The acceptance of ] ] as a dominant ] in the area, as well as a ], was marked by ] mass ] by ], a ruler of ]. After the great ] that soon followed, the territory of ] remained with the ]'s ]. While most of the Christians in ] were and still are Orthodox, since ] an ] ] (UGCC), which claimed varying with time but always a significant membership in western Ukraine, is in ] with the ]. Still, Eastern Orthodoxy remained a traditional religion in Ukraine and at some points in history was inseparable from most Ukrainians' national self-identity.


== Early history ==
The political jurisdiction of Orthodox churches in Ukraine changed several times in its history. Currently, three major Ukrainian Orthodox church bodies coexist, and often compete, in Ukraine: the ], the ] and the ]. Of them only the ], ] under the ], has a ] standing (legal recognition) within the worldwide ], and operates in ] with the other Eastern Orthodox Churches. However, since the differences within Ukrainian Orthodoxy are purely political rather than doctrinal, this situation may be resolved at some future point with a single Ukrainian Orthodox Church to unite the Orthodox Christians in the nation.


===Andrew the Apostle===
The ], that had some notable presence in the territory of Ukraine since at least the ], was preached for the following centuries mostly by the foreign visitors and settlers. While this situation changed somewhat in the recent decades, the Protestants in today's Ukraine remain a relatively small minority.
] depicted by his raising a cross, in the ].]]
] the ] is believed to have travelled up the western shores of the ], to the area of present-day southern Ukraine, while preaching in the lands of ]. Legend (recorded in the ]) has it that he travelled further still, up the ], until he came to the location of present-day Kiev in AD 55, where he erected a ] and prophesied the foundation of a great Christian city. Belief in the missionary visit of Andrew became widespread by the ], and by 1621, a Kiev synod had declared him the "Rus'-apostle".<ref name="Wilson">] (2000). ''The Ukrainians: Unexpected Nation'', Yale University Press, {{ISBN|0-300-09309-8}}; pages 33-37.</ref> ], a disciple of Andrew, is also venerated in Ukrainian churches, as are three "]" disciples, Saints Ina, Pina and Rima, who accompanied him to Kiev.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.byzcath.org/sites/alex/web/All-Kievan-Saints.pdf |title=List of All Kievan Saints |access-date=2013-09-28 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060831210657/http://www.byzcath.org/sites/alex/web/All-Kievan-Saints.pdf |archive-date=August 31, 2006 }} at the </ref> Both the 18th-century ] and an earlier structure from 1086 it replaced were purportedly built on the very location of the apostle's cross, planted on a hill overlooking the city of Kiev.


Although the ] refers to the apostle continuing his journey as far north as ], Andrew's visit to any of these lands has not been proven, and in fact may have been a later invention designed to boost the ] aspirations in the territories where the upper clergy continued to be dominated by Greeks for several centuries.<ref>{{in lang|uk}} Panas, Kost' (1992). ''History of the Ukrainian Church (Історія української церкви)'', Transintekh; p. 12.</ref>
== Early history ==

These first half-legendary Christian churches on the territory of present Ukraine were eliminated by the Gothic invasion in the third century. The head of the "Scythian bishopric" presented at the ] in 325 probably in fact was Bishop Cadmus from the ].<ref name="Wilson"/>

===Crimean roots===
]) ], a place where East Slavic Christianity was born.]]
] Cyril and Methodius brothers as the Christian saints.]]
{{further|Metropolitanate of Gothia}}

] (ruled 88–98) was exiled to ] on the ] in 102, as was ] in 655. Furthermore, it has been definitively recorded that a representative from the Black Sea area, the "head of the Scythian bishopric", was present at the ] in 325, as well as the ] in 381; it has been surmised that this representative would have to have been Bishop Cadmus of the Bosporan Kingdom. ], who remained on present-day Ukrainian lands after the ], established a ] under the ] at ] in northern Crimea around the year 400. A ] had also existed since 868 across the ], in the ancient city of ]. The ] and the Antes cultures, located so close to the Crimea, surely became familiarized with Christianity by this time.

===Cyril and Methodius===
The relics of Pope Martin were allegedly retrieved by the "]" brothers ], who passed through present-day Ukraine on their way to preach to the ]. Sent from Constantinople at the request of the ruler of ], these brothers would add to foundation of Christianity in Ukraine by creating the ], a precursor to the ]ous "]", which enabled the local population to worship God in ], a language closer to the ] ] than the ] used to worship in Constantinople, or ] in the west.

In response to local disputes with clerics of the Latin Church, Cyril and Methodius appealed in person to the ] in 867, bringing with them the relics of Pope Martin from Chersonesos. Their labors and request were met with approval, and their continued efforts planted the Christian faith into Ukrainian Rus. By 906, they had founded a ], today a diocese of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church in ], ]. Their efforts, and those of their apostles, led to the translation of ] and service (liturgies) from Greek to Slavonic, and the eventual development of the modern ].

==Early Rus' period==
{{Main|Christianization of Kievan Rus'}}
]ans'', a fresco by ].]]
] Rus' long before its final Christianization. ''First Christians in Kiev'' by ].]]
By the ], it is known that the ] population of western Ukraine (likely the ]) had accepted Christianity while under the rule of ]. However, it was the ] who came to dominate most of the territory of present-day Ukraine, beginning with the rule of the ], whose ] had held a considerable following for over 600 years.

Following the ] by Rus' forces under the command of ], the two princes were baptized in that holy city. Returning to Kiev, the two actively championed Christianity for a period of 20 years, until they were murdered by the ] ] in the inter-princely rivalry for the Kiev throne. ] purportedly provided a bishop and priests from ] to help in the ] of the Slavs.<ref>Chirovsky, Nicholas (1981). ''Ancient and Kievan-Galician Ukraine-Rus'', Philosophical Library; page 216.</ref> By 900, a church was already established in Kiev, St. Elijah's, modeled on a church of the same name in Constantinople. This gradual acceptance of Christianity is most notable in the ] of 945, which was signed by both "baptized" and unbaptized Rus'", according to the text included in the Primary Chronicle.


===Establishment of the Kiev Metropolitan===
The ] is thought to have preached on the southern borders of Ukraine, along the ]. Legend has is that he travelled up the ] and reached the future location of Kiev, where he erected a cross on the site where the ] currently stands, and prophesied the foundation of a great Christian city. A representative from ] was present at the ] (]). Around this time, these churches and the inland farther north came under the control of the ], some of whom were Christians.
Christianity acceptance among the Rus' nobility gained a vital proponent when ], the ruler of Kiev, became baptized, taking the "]" ''Helen''. Her baptism in 955 (or 957) in either Kiev or Constantinople (accounts differ) was a turning point in religious life of Rus' but it was left to her grandson, ], to make Kievan Rus a Christian state. Both Vladimir and Olga are venerated as the ] by the ].


Princess ] shortly after her baptism appealed to the ] ] to send missionaries into Kievan Rus. ], a ] missionary bishop from Germany, was sent, but his missions and the priests who missionized along with him, were stopped. Most of the group of Latin missionaries were slain by ] sent by Olga's son, Prince ], who had taken ] from his mother.
] by S. Kirillov.]]
Some of the ] population of Kiev and Western Ukraine under the rule of ] were Christians in the ]. Christianity was gradually spreading among the ] nobility with ] (St. Olga) being the first known ruler to have been baptized as ''Helen''. Her baptism in ] or ] in Kiev or Constantinople (accounts differ) was a turning point in religious life of Rus' but it was left to her grandson, ], to make ] a Christian state.


Christianity became dominant in the territory with the mass ] in the ] in ] ordered by Vladimir. Following the ] in ], the ] that incorporated most of modern Ukraine ended up on the ] side of the divided Christian world. Christianity became dominant in the territory with the mass ] in the ] in 988 ordered by Vladimir. That year is considered as the year of establishment of the Kiev Metropolis and part of the ]. The exact date of establishment is not clearly known as the Kiev eparchy (metropolis) is mentioned as early as 891. The first cathedral temple, ] (Assumption of Virgin Mary), was built in 996.


Early on, the Orthodox Christian ]s had their seat in ], and later in Kiev. The people of Kiev lost their Metropolitan to ] in ], but regained a Ukrainian Metropolitan in ] in ]. The religious affairs were also ruled in part by a Metropolitan in ], (present-day ]). Following the ] in 1054, the ] that incorporated some of the modern Ukraine ended up on the ] ] side of the divided Christian world. Early on, the Orthodox Christian ] had their seat in ], and later in Kiev. The people of Kiev lost their Metropolitan to ] in 1299 (who retained the title), but gained a new Metropolitan in ] in 1303. The religious affairs were also ruled in part by a Metropolitan in ], (present-day ]).


==After the Breakup of the Kievan Rus== ==After the breakup of the Kievan Rus==


In the ], the primacy over the Ukrainian church was restored to Kiev, under the title "]". One clause of the ] stipulated that ] would disseminate ] among Orthodox subjects of the ], of which Ukraine was a part. The opposition from the ]s and other Orthodox ]s led to this policy being suspended in the early 16th century. In the 15th century, the primacy over the '''Ruthenian Orthodox Church''' was moved to ], under the title "]". One clause of the ] stipulated that ] would disseminate ] among Orthodox subjects of the ], of which Ukraine was a part. The opposition from the ]s and other Orthodox ]s led to this policy being suspended in the early 16th century.


Following the ], the ] of the Ukrainian church was accelerated. Unlike the Roman Catholic church, the Orthodox church in Ukraine was liable to various taxes and legal obligations. The building of new Orthodox churches was strongly discouraged. The Roman Catholics were strictly forbidden to convert to Orthodoxy, and the marriages between Catholics and Orthodox were frowned upon. Orthodox subjects had been increasingly barred from high offices of state{{fact}}. Following the ], the ] of the Ukrainian church was accelerated. Unlike the Catholic Church, the Orthodox church in Ukraine was liable to various taxes and legal obligations. The building of new Orthodox churches was strongly discouraged. The Catholics were strictly forbidden to convert to Orthodoxy, and the marriages between Catholics and Orthodox were frowned upon. Orthodox subjects had been increasingly barred from high offices of state.<ref name=KostOstr>{{in lang|ru}} ], ''"Russian History in Biographies of its main figures"'', Chapter ''''" (])</ref>


===Union of Brest and its aftermath=== ===Union of Brest and its aftermath===
], from the ] collection. Artist unknown, c. 1670.]]
{{Main|Union of Brest}}


In order to oppose such restrictions and to reverse cultural polonization of Orthodox bishops, the ] encouraged the activity of the Orthodox urban communities called the "brotherhoods" ''(bratstvo)''. In ] ], the bishop of ], asked the Pope to take him under his protection, because he was exasperated by the struggle with urban communities and the Ecumenical Patriarch. He was followed by the bishops of ], ], and ] in ]. In the following years, the bishops of ] and ] and the Metropolitan of ] announced their secession from the Ecumenical Patriarchate. In ] some representatives of this group arrived to ] and asked the Pope to take them under his jurisdiction. In order to oppose such restrictions and to reverse cultural polonization of Orthodox bishops, the ] encouraged the activity of the Orthodox urban communities called the "brotherhoods" ''(])''. In 1589 ], the bishop of ], asked the Pope to take him under his protection, because he was exasperated by the struggle with urban communities and the Ecumenical Patriarch. He was followed by the bishops of ], ], and ] in 1590. In the following years, the bishops of ] and Przemyśl and the Metropolitan of Kiev announced their secession from the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, which was increasingly influenced by the ]. In 1595 some representatives of this group arrived to Rome and asked ] to take them under his jurisdiction and unite them to the ].


In the ] of ] (colloquially known as ''unia''), a part of the Ukrainian Church was accepted under the jurisdiction of the Roman Pope, becoming a ], colloquially known as Uniates Church. While the new church gained many faithful among the ] in ] and ], the majority of Ukrainians in the rest of the lands remained within ] with the church affairs ruled by then from Kiev under the metropolitan ] ''(Petro Mohyla)''. The eastward spread of the Union of Brest led to violent clashes, for example, assassination of the ] ] ] by the Orthodox mob in ] in ]. In the ] of 1596 (colloquially known as ''unia''), a part of the Ukrainian Church was accepted under the jurisdiction of the Roman Pope, becoming a ] ], a Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, colloquially known as the Uniate Church. While the new church gained many faithful among the ] in ], the majority of Ukrainians in the rest of the lands remained within ] with the church affairs ruled by then from Kiev under the metropolitan ]. The Orthodox Church was made illegal (its legality was partially restored in 1607), its property confiscated, and Orthodox believers faced persecution and discrimination which became an important reason for large numbers of Ukrainians to emigrate to Tsardom of Russia following the Union.<ref>Magocsi, R.P. (1996). ''A History of Ukraine''. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. {{ISBN|0-8020-7820-6}} Pg. 169 and 211.</ref> The eastward spread of the Union of Brest led to violent clashes, for example, assassination of the Greek Catholic ] ] by the Orthodox mob in ] in 1623.


===Khmelnytsky Uprising=== ===Khmelnytsky Uprising===
{{main|Khmelnytsky Uprising}} {{Main|Khmelnytsky Uprising}}

As the ''unia'' continued its expansion into Ukraine, its unpopularity grew, particularly in the southern ]s where ] lived. Most of them valuing their traditions and culture saw the ''unia'' as a final step of ], and as a result became even more fiercely loyal to the Orthodox Church. Such feelings played a role in the ] whose targets included Catholic and Uniate clergy. During this time metropolitan ] took full advantage of the moment to restore the Orthodox domination in Ukraine, including returning one of its sacred buildings, the ].
As the ''unia'' continued its expansion into Ukraine, its unpopularity grew, particularly in the southern ]s where ] lived. The Cossacks, who valued their traditions and culture, saw the ''unia'' as a final step of Polonization. As a result, they reacted by becoming fierce proponents of Orthodoxy. Such feelings played a role in the ] whose targets included all non-Orthodox religious proponents, the Catholic and Uniate clergy and Jews. During this time metropolitan ] took full advantage of the moment to restore the Orthodox domination in Ukraine, including returning one of its sacred buildings, the ].


==Rule of the Empires== ==Rule of the Empires==
{{main|Russian Orthodox Church}} {{Main|Russian Orthodox Church}}


===Territories gained by Pereyaslavl Rada=== ===Territories gained by Pereyaslav Rada===

In ], 40 years after ] death, the ], acting on the behalf of the ] of Russia ], pressured the ] into transferring the Orthodox Church of Kiev and all Rus' from the jurisdiction of Constantinople to the ], established a century prior to that. The legality of this step is occasionally questioned to this day along with the fact that the transfer was accompanied by the bribery, which in church affairs amounts to an ecclesiastical crime. The transfer itself, however, led to the significant Ukrainian domination of the ], which continued well into the 18th century, ], ], ] and ] being among the most notable representatives of this trend.<ref name=Kargamanov>"As a result, the Kievans practically controlled the Russian church obtaining key posts there (and holding them to almost the end of the 18th century)"<br>Yuri Kagramanov, "", ], 2006, № 8</ref>
In 1686, 40 years after ] death, the ], acting on the behalf of the ] of Russia ], pressured the ] into transferring the Orthodox Church of Kiev and all Rus' from the jurisdiction of Constantinople to the ], established a century prior to that. The legality of this step is occasionally questioned to this day along with the fact that the transfer was accompanied by graft and bribery, which in church affairs amounts to an ecclesiastical crime. The transfer itself, however, led to the significant Ukrainian domination of the Russian Orthodox Church, which continued well into the 18th century, ], ], ] and ] being among the most notable representatives of this trend.<ref name=Kargamanov>"As a result, the Kievans practically controlled the Russian church obtaining key posts there (and holding them to almost the end of the 18th century)"<br />Yuri Kagramanov, " {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071001001419/http://magazines.russ.ru/novyi_mi/2006/8/ka10.html |date=2007-10-01 }}", ], 2006, № 8.</ref>


===Territories gained from Crimean Khanate=== ===Territories gained from Crimean Khanate===

In the late 18th century, the ] (Vassal for Ottoman Empire) was conquered by Russia, and the latter annexed most of the southern steppes and Crimea. Colonisation of these lands was actively encouraged by Orthodox people, particularly Ukrainians and Serbs. As ] (Novorossiya), as it was then known) was settled, Orthodox parishes were created and increased. Mass construction of Cathedrals that show some of the best examples of late 19th century ] took place in large cities like ] and ].
In the late 18th century, the ] (Vassal for Ottoman Empire) was conquered by Russia, and the latter annexed most of the southern steppes and Crimea. Colonization of these lands was actively encouraged by Orthodox people, particularly Ukrainians, Russians and Serbs. As ] (Novorossiya, as it was then known) was settled, new Orthodox parishes were created. Construction of cathedrals that demonstrate some of the finest examples of late-19th-century ] was undertaken in large cities such as ] and ].


===Territories gained from partitions=== ===Territories gained from partitions===
In the late 17th century the Poland became less and less influential and internal corruption as well as the pressure from its powerful neighbors resulted in its ] by neighbouring empires. The ], in particular, gained a lot of ethnically ] land and all of the ] lands. After nearely two centuries of ], the Uniate influence on the Ukrainian population was so great that hardly any remained Orthodox. Although some, particularly in ], chose to revert to Orhtodoxy soon after, this in many cases was an exception rather than trend and in locations where the Unia already gave deep roots into the population all of the church property remained in the Catholic and Uniate authority. Also significant was Empress ]'s decree "On the newely acquired territory", according to which most of the Polish magnates retained all their lands and property (thus a significant control over population) in the newly acquired lands.


In the late 17th century Poland became less and less influential and internal corruption as well as the pressure from its powerful neighbors resulted in its ] by neighbouring empires. The ], in particular, gained most of ethnically ] land and all of the ] lands. After nearly two centuries of polonization, the Uniate influence on the Ukrainian population was so great that hardly any remained Orthodox. Although some, particularly in ], chose to revert to Orthodoxy soon after, this in many cases was an exception rather than trend and in locations where the Unia already gave deep roots into the population all of the church property remained in the Catholic and Uniate authority. Also significant was Empress ]'s decree "On the newly acquired territory", according to which most of the Polish magnates retained all their lands and property (thus a significant control over population) in the newly acquired lands.
Nevertheless the first ] tendencies began to surface, and came in face of the Uniate Bishop ]. Believing that the Uniate Church's role as an interim bridge between ] and their eventual path to ] is over now that the ruler of the lands is no longer a Catholic, but an Orthodox Monarch, he began to push for an eventual reversion of all Uniates. Although the idea was shared by most of the lower priests, the ruling Uniate ], controlled by the strong Polish influence, rejected all Semashko's suggestions. In addition many of the Latin Catholic authorities responded to this by actively converting the Uniates into pure ] Catholicism.


Nevertheless, the first ] tendencies began to surface, and came in face of the Uniate Bishop ]. Believing that the Uniate Church's role as an interim bridge between ] and their eventual path to Catholicism is over, now that the ruler of the lands is no longer a Catholic, but an Orthodox Monarch, he began to push for an eventual reversion of all Uniates. Although the idea was shared by growing number of the lower priests, the ruling Uniate ], controlled by the strong Polish influence, rejected all Semashko's suggestions.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pravoslavie.ru/arhiv/050513111111.htm#rel1 |title=Воссоединение униатов и исторические судьбы белорусского народа |publisher=Pravoslavie.ru |access-date=2019-01-16}}</ref> In addition many of the ] Catholic authorities responded to this by actively ] and hierarchy.{{citation needed|date=August 2023}}
In ], the general discontent of the Poles with the Russian rule erupted into a revolt, now known as the ], which the Uniate Church officially supported. However the uprising failed, and the Russian authority were quick to respond to its organisers and areas of strongest support. The outcome was that the Uniate synod's members were removed along with most of the Polish magnates privliges' and authority being taken taken away. With the Polish influence in the Ruthenian lands significantly reduced and in some cases eliminated, the Uniate Church began to disintegrate. In ] the famous ] was returned to the Orthodoxy in ]. The final blow came from the Uniate ] in ] headed by Bishop Semashko, where it was agreed to terminate the accords of ] and all remaining Uniate property on the territory of the ] was reincorporated into the ].

In 1831, the general discontent of the Poles with the Russian rule erupted into a revolt, now known as the ], which the Uniate Church officially supported. However, the uprising failed, and the Russian authorities were quick to respond to its organisers and areas of strongest support. The outcome was that the Uniate synod's members were removed along with most of the Polish magnates privileges' and authority being taken away. With the Polish influence in the Ruthenian lands significantly reduced and in some cases eliminated, the Uniate Church began to disintegrate. In ] the famous ] was returned to Russian Orthodox clergy in 1833. The final blow came from the Synod of Polotsk in 1839 headed by the ex-Uniate Bishop Semashko, where it was agreed to terminate the accords of Union of Brest and all of the remaining Uniate property on the territory of the Belarus and Right Bank Ukraine within the Russian Empire was incorporated into the Russian Orthodox Church. Those Uniate clergy who refused to join the Russian Orthodox Church (593 out of a total of 1,898 in Ukraine and Belarus) were exiled to the Russian interior or Siberia.<ref>Magocsi, R.P. (1996). ''A History of Ukraine''. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. {{ISBN|0-8020-7820-6}} Pg. 375.</ref> By means of mass deportations, persecution and even executions the Uniates were practically eliminated in the Russian Empire. Only a small number of Greek Catholics in the ] managed to preserve their faith.<ref name="autogenerated3" />

Within the Russian Empire, the Uniate Church continued to function until 1875, when the Eparchy of ] was ].The greater longevity of the Uniate Church in this region was attributed to the fact that it came under Russian control later than did the other territories (1809) and that, unlike other Ukrainian regions within the Russian Empire, it had been part of the ], which had some autonomy until 1865. Within Chelm, the conversion to Orthodoxy met with strong resistance from the local ethnic Ukrainian priests and parishioners, and was accomplished largely through the efforts of Russian police, Cossacks, and immigrating ] priests from ]. The resistance was strong enough that when, a generation later in 1905, the formally Eastern Orthodox population of Chelm was allowed to return to Catholicism (Russian authorities only allowing conversion to the Latin Church), 170,000 out of 450,000 did so by 1908.<ref>Himka, John Paul. (1999). ''Religion and Nationality in Western Ukraine.'' McGill-Queen's University Press: Montreal and Kingston. Pg. 32 and pp. 58-60.</ref>

] after its return to Orthodoxy in 1833 became a major bastion against the Catholic-ruled ].]]


===Austrian Galicia and World War I=== ===Austrian Galicia and World War I===
{{Further|Western Ukrainian Clergy}}
Although the ] awarded most of the Ruthenian lands to the ], this excluded the southwestern ] (constituting the modern ], ] and parts of ] oblasts), which fell under the control of the ]. Similarly to the situation in the lands of the Russian Empire, the uniate Ruthenian (Ukrainian) peasentry was largely under the Polish Latin Catholic domination. The Austrians granted equal legal privileges to the Uniate Church and removed Polish influence. As a result, within Austrian Galicia over the next century the Uniate Church ceased being a puppet of foreign interests and became the primary cultural force within the Ukrainian community. Most independent native Ukrainian cultural trends (such as Rusynophilia, ] and later Ukrainophilia) emerged from within the ranks of the Uniate Church. For many people, the Austrians were seen as having saved the Ukrainians and their Church from the Poles.

Although the ] awarded most of the Ruthenian lands to the Russian Empire, this excluded the southwestern ] (constituting the modern ], ] and parts of ] oblasts), which fell under the control of the ] and subsequently the ] and the ]. Similarly to the situation in the lands of the Russian Empire, the ] ] (Ukrainian) peasantry was largely under the Polish Latin Catholic domination. The Austrians granted equal legal privileges to the Uniate Church and removed Polish influence. They also mandated that Uniate seminarians receive a formal higher education (previously, priests had been educated informally by other priests, usually their fathers, as the vocation was passed on within families), and organized institutions in ] and Lviv that would serve this function. This led to the appearance, for the first time, of a ] within the Ukrainian population in Galicia.<ref>Himka, John Paul. (1999). ''Religion and Nationality in Western Ukraine.'' McGill-Queen's University Press: Montreal and Kingston. Pg. 6.</ref> As a result, within Austrian Galicia over the next century the Uniate Church ceased being a puppet of foreign interests and became the primary cultural force within the Ukrainian community. Most independent native Ukrainian cultural trends (such as Rusynophilia, ] and later ]) emerged from within the ranks of the Uniate Church. The participation of Uniate priests or their children in western Ukrainian cultural and political life was so great that western Ukrainians were accused of wanting to create a theocracy in western Ukraine by their Polish rivals.<ref>Himka, John Paul. (1999). ''Religion and Nationality in Western Ukraine.'' McGill-Queen's University Press: Montreal and Kingston. Pg. 10.</ref>

During the 19th century there was a struggle within the Uniate Church (and therefore within the general Galician society due to its domination by priests) between Russophiles who desired union with Russia and ] who saw the Galician Ruthenians as Ukrainians, not Russians. The former group were mostly represented by older and more conservative elements of the priesthood, while the latter ideology was more popular among the younger priests. The Russophilia of the Galician ] was particularly strong during the mid-19th century, although by the end of that century the Russophiles had declined in importance relative to the Ukrainophiles.<ref name="autogenerated3">{{cite book | author = Subtelny, O. | title = Ukraine: A History | location = Toronto | publisher = University of Toronto Press | year = 1988 }}</ref> The Austrian authorities during this time began to be more and more involved in the power-struggle with Russia for the rule of the ], as the declining ] withdrew, and in so doing opposed the Russophiles. The Balkans themselves were largely Orthodox and crucial to the Russian ] movement. In this situation, the Galician Ruthenians found themselves in the pawn's position.


When the power struggle erupted into the First World War, the ] initially quickly overran Galicia (see ]). Free of Polish domination,<!---please read POLONIZATION article before weaselizing this with "influences"---> unlike in other areas of Ukraine the Uniate church had become closely linked to the Ukrainian people and the Ukrainian national movement. For this reason, the population in general were quite loyal to the ], earning the nickname "Tyroleans of the East",<ref name="autogenerated3" /><ref name=Magosci>{{cite book| author = Magoscy, R. | title = A History of Ukraine | location = Toronto | publisher = University of Toronto Press | year = 1996 }}</ref> and resisted reunion into the Orthodox Church. A minority of them, however, welcomed the Russians and reverted to Orthodoxy. After regaining the lost territories with the counterattack in late 1914, the Austrian authorities responded with repressions: several thousand Orthodox and Russophilic people died while being interred at a ] concentration camp for those deemed disloyal to Austria. Already a minority, the Russophiles were largely extinguished as a religious-cultural force in Galicia as a result of these actions.
During the nineteenth century there was a struggle within the Uniate Church (and therefore within the general Galician society) between Russophiles who desired union with Russia and Ukrainophiles who saw the Galician Ruthenians as Ukrainians, not Russians. The former group were mostly represented by older and more conservative elements of the priesthood, while the latter ideology was more popular among the younger priests. The ] of the Galician ] was particularly strong during the mid-19th century, although by the end of that century the Russophiles had declined in importance relative to the Ukrainophiles.<ref name=Subtelny>{{cite book| author=Subtelny, O. | title=Ukraine: A History| location= Toronto | publisher= University of Toronto Press|year = 1988| }}</ref> The Austrian authorities during this time began to be more and more involved in the power-struggle with Russia for the rule of the ], as the declining ] withdrew, and in so doing opposed the Russophiles. The Balkans themselves were largely Orthodox and crucial to the Russian ] movement. In this situation, the Galician Ruthenians found themselves in the pawn's position.


==Twentieth and twenty-first centuries==
When the power struggle erupted into the ], the ] initially quickly overran Galicia (see ]). Free of Polish domination, unlike in other areas of Ukraine the Uniate church had become closely linked to the Ukrainian people and the Ukrainian national movement. For this reason, the population in general were quite loyal to the ], earning the nickname "Tyroleans of the East",<ref name=Magosci>{{cite book| author=Magoscy, R. | title=A History of Ukraine| location= Toronto | publisher= University of Toronto Press | year = 1996| }}</ref> <ref name=Subtelny>{{cite book| author=Subtelny, O. | title=Ukraine: A History| location= Toronto | publisher= University of Toronto Press|year = 1988| }}</ref> and resisted reunion into the Orthodox Church. A minority of them, however, welcomed the Russians and reverted to Orthodoxy. After regaining the lost territories with the counterattack in late ], the Austrian authorities responded with repressions: several thousand Orthodox and Russophilic people died while being interred at a Talerhof concentration camp for those deemed disloyal to Austria. Already a minority, the Russophiles were largely extinguished as a religious-cultural force in Galicia as a result of these actions.


== Twentieth Century ==
===Soviet Union=== ===Soviet Union===
After the ] and the ] the Bolsheviks seized power in the ] and transformed it into the ]. Religion in the new ] state had little value, but particularly the ] who was actively supportive of the ]. Massive arrests and repressions began immediately. In the ] (one of the founding republics of the USSR) as early as in December ] the first execution of the head of the Ukrainian Exarchate Metropolitan of Kiev and Halych took place. This was only the start which culminated in mass closing and destruction of churches that (some standing since the days of the ]) and executions of clergy and followers. After the ] and the ] the Bolsheviks seized power in the Russian Empire and transformed it into the Soviet Union. Religion in the new socialist society was assigned little value by the state, but in particular Russian Orthodox Church was distrusted because of its active support of the ]. Massive arrests and repressions began immediately. In the ] (one of the founding republics of the USSR) as early as in December 1918 the first execution of the head of the Ukrainian Exarchate Metropolitan of Kiev and ] took place. This was only the start which culminated in mass closing and destruction of churches (some standing since the days of the Kievan Rus) and executions of clergy and followers.


Ukraine was controlled by several ] which revived the Ukrainian national idea. Ukraine declared its political independence following the fall of the ] in 1918 and the ] was established.
Prior to the ]s victory, Ukraine was controlled by several ] which revived the Ukrainian national idea. One of the suggestions that some of the states put up was a creation of an independent and ] Orthodox Church. Following the Soviet regime's taking root in Ukraine and despite the ongoing Soviet-wide antireligious campaign, the Bolshevik authorities saw the national churches as a tool in their goal to suppress the ] always viewed with the great suspicion by the regime for its being the cornerstone of pre-revolutionary ] and the initially strong opposition the church took towards the regime change (the position of the ] ] was especially critical). Hence in ] and with blessing of the authoroties, a group of clergy announced the creation of the new ] (UAOC), the so called "first formation". However, as there were no available bishops willing or able to lead or ordain a hierarchy for a new ], the church ordained its own hierarchy itself, a practice questionable under the ], in a so-called "Alexandrian" manner - by laying on priests' hands for two senior candidates who became known as ] and ] (reportedly the relics of St. Clement of Rome who died in Ukraine in the first century were also used). Despite the ] controversy, the new church was recognized in 1924 by the ] Gregory VII.{{fact}} In the wake of the ] policies carried out in Soviet Ukraine in the first decade of the Soviet rule many of the Orthodox clergy willfully joined the church to avoid persecution that awaited them should they remain inside the Russian Orthodox Church. As the government tolerated the new Ukrainian national church for some time, the UAOC gained a wide following among the Ukrainian peasantry.


Following the Soviet regime's taking root in Ukraine and despite the ongoing Soviet-wide antireligious campaign, the Bolshevik authorities saw the national churches as a tool in their goal to suppress the Russian Orthodox Church always viewed with the great suspicion by the regime for its being the cornerstone of pre-revolutionary Russian Empire and the initially strong opposition the church took towards the regime change (the position of the ] ] was especially critical).
However in the early-] the ] government abruptly reversed the policies in the national republics and the UAOC fared no better than the Russian Orthodox church as the mass arrests of UAOC's hierarchy and clergy culminated in the liquidation of the church in 1930.


On November 11, 1921 , an unrecognised Church Council started in Kiev. The council would proclaim the first formation of the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church (UAOC). The Russian Orthodox Church strongly opposed the formation of the Ukrainian autocephaly and not a single ordained bishop was willing or able to ordain the hierarchy for a new church. Therefore, the clergy "ordained" its own hierarchy itself, a practice questionable under the ], in the "Alexandrian" manner - by laying on priests' hands on two senior candidates who became known as ] and Archbishop Nestor (Sharayivsky) (reportedly the relics of Clement of Rome who died in Ukraine in the 1st century were also used).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.unicorne.org/ORTHODOXY/articles/contributors/articles/historyuocc.htm |last=Unicorne |title=A Brief History of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church |date=2020 |access-date=20 February 2021}}</ref> Despite the canon law controversy, the new church was recognized in 1924 by the Ecumenical Patriarch ].<ref>{{cite web |title=ARTICLES ON THE HISTORY OF OUR JURISDICTION |url=http://uaocamerica.com/our-history-statutes--polic/articles-on-our-jurisdictio.html |publisher=Ukrainian Orthodox Church |access-date=March 23, 2024 |date=July 25, 1999}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Zhukovsky |first1=Arkadii |title=Autocephaly |url=https://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com/display.asp?linkpath=pages%5CA%5CU%5CAutocephaly.htm |website=Encyclopedia Of Ukraine |access-date=March 23, 2024 |date=2005}}</ref>
On the eve of the ] only 3% of the pre-revolutionary parishes on the territory of Ukraine remained open to the public, often hidden in deep rural areas.

In the wake of the ] policies carried out in Soviet Ukraine in the first decade of the Soviet rule many of the Orthodox clergy willfully joined the church thus avoiding the persecution suffered by many clergy members who remained inside the Russian Orthodox Church. During the period in which the Soviet government tolerated the renewed Ukrainian national church the UAOC gained a wide following particularly among the Ukrainian peasantry.<ref>{{cite book| author = Robert Conquest | title = The harvest of sorrow: Soviet collectivization and the terror-famine | url=https://archive.org/details/harvestofsorrows00conq | url-access = registration | location = Oxford, United Kingdom | publisher = Oxford University Press | year = 1986 |isbn=0-19-505180-7 | pages =}}</ref>
] after its destruction in 1936 ]]
In the early-1930s the Soviet government abruptly reversed the policies in the national republics and mass arrests of UAOC's hierarchy and clergy culminated in the liquidation of the church in 1930. Most of the surviving property was officially transferred to the ROC, with some churches closed for good and destroyed. On the eve of the Second World War only 3% of the pre-revolutionary parishes on the territory of Ukraine remained open to the public, often hidden in deep rural areas.


===Second Polish Republic=== ===Second Polish Republic===
The 1921 ] treaty that ended the ] gave the significant areas of the ethnically Ukrainian (and Belarusian) territories to the reborn ]. This included ] and ], areas with almost exclussively Orthodox population amongst the rural peasants, as well as the former Austrian province of ] with its ] population. The 1921 ] treaty that ended the ] gave the significant areas of the ethnically Ukrainian (and Belarusian) territories to the reborn ]. This included ] and ], areas with almost exclusively Orthodox population amongst the rural peasants, as well as the former Austrian province of Galicia with its ] population.


While the Greek Catholic church, which functions in communion with the ] Catholicism, could have hoped to receive a better treatment in Poland, whose leadership saw the Catholicism as one of the main tools to unify the nation where non-Polish minority comprised over one third of the citizenry. Nevertheles, the Poles saw the Greek Catholic Galicia Ukrainians as even less reliable and loyal as the Orthodox Volhynia Ukrainians. Also, despite the communion with Rome, the UGCC attained a strong Ukrainian national character of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, and the Polish authorities sought to weaken it in various ways. In 1924, following a visit with the Ukrainian Catholic believers in North America and western Europe, the head of the UGCC was initially denied reentry to Lviv until after a considerable delay. Polish priests led by their bishops began to undertake missionary work among Eastern Rite faithful, and the administrative restrictions were placed on the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church <ref name=Magosci>{{cite book| author=Magosci, P. | title=Morality and Reality: the Life and Times of Andrei Sheptytsky| location= Edmonton, Alberta | publisher= Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, University of Alberta | year = 1989| }}</ref>. The Greek Catholic church, which functions in communion with the Latin Catholicism, could have hoped to receive a better treatment in Poland, whose leadership, especially the '']'' party, saw the Catholicism as one of the main tools to unify the nation where non-Polish minority comprised over one third of the citizenry. Nevertheless, the Poles saw the Greek Catholic Galicia Ukrainians as even less reliable and loyal as the Orthodox Volhynia Ukrainians. Also, despite the communion with Rome, the UGCC attained a strong Ukrainian national character of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, and the Polish authorities sought to weaken it in various ways. In 1924, following a visit with the Ukrainian Catholic believers in North America and western Europe, the head of the UGCC was initially denied reentry to Lviv until after a considerable delay. Polish priests led by their bishops began to undertake missionary work among Eastern Catholic faithful, and the administrative restrictions were placed on the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church.<ref name="autogenerated1">{{cite book| author = Magosci, P. | title = Morality and Reality: the Life and Times of Andrei Sheptytsky | location = Edmonton, Alberta | publisher = Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, University of Alberta | year = 1989 }}</ref>


With respect to the Orthodox Ukrainian population in eastern Poland, the ] initially issued a decree defending the rights of the Orthodox minorities. In practice, this often failed, as the ], also eager to strengthen their position, had official representation in the ] and the courts. Any accusation was strong enough for a particular church to be confiscated and handed over to the Roman Catholic church. During the Polish rule, 190 Orthodox churches were destroyed and 150 were forcibly transformed into Roman Catholic (not Ukrainian Catholic) churches <ref name=Subtelny>{{cite book| author=Subtelny, O. | title=Ukraine: A History| location= Toronto | publisher= University of Toronto Press | year = 1988| }}</ref>. Such actions were condemned by the head of the Ukrainian Catholic Church, metropolitan ], who claimed that these acts would "destroy in the souls of our non-united Orthodox brothers the very thought of any possibility of reunion." <ref name=Magosci>{{cite book| author=Magosci, P. | title=Morality and Reality: the Life and Times of Andrei Sheptytsky| location= Edmonton, Alberta | publisher= Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, University of Alberta | year = 1989| }}</ref> With respect to the Orthodox Ukrainian population in eastern Poland, the ] initially issued a decree defending the rights of the Orthodox minorities. In practice, this often failed, as the ], also eager to strengthen their position, had stronger representation in the ] and the courts. During the Polish rule, 190 Orthodox churches were destroyed (although some of them have already been abandoned)<ref name="BP">''The Impact of External Threat on States and Domestic Societies'', ] in ''Dissolving Boundaries'', Blackwell Publishers, 2003, {{ISBN|1-4051-2134-3}}, </ref> and 150 were forcibly transformed into Catholic (not Ukrainian Catholic) churches.<ref name="autogenerated2">{{cite book| author = Subtelny, O. | title = Ukraine: A History | location = Toronto | publisher = University of Toronto Press | year = 1988 }}</ref> Such actions were condemned by the head of the Ukrainian Catholic Church, metropolitan ], who claimed that these acts would "destroy in the souls of our non-united Orthodox brothers the very thought of any possibility of reunion."<ref name="autogenerated1" />


In addition to persecution from the new authorities, the Orthodox clergy found itself with no ecclestical link to submit to. Like most ex-] communities that ended up outside the USSR, and thus with no possible contact with the persecuted mother church, the ] agreed to take over ]'s role and in ] the ] was formed out of the parishes that were on the territory of the Polish republic although 90% of its clergy and believers were non-Polish people. In addition to persecution from the new authorities, the Orthodox clergy found itself with no ecclesiastical link to submit to. Like most ex-] communities that ended up outside the USSR, and thus with no possible contact with the persecuted mother church, the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople agreed to take over ]'s role and in 1923 the ] was formed out of the parishes that were on the territory of the Polish republic although 90% of its clergy and believers were non-Polish people.


===Czechoslovakia=== ===Czechoslovakia===
The redrawal of national boundaries following ] also affected yet another ethnically Ruthenian territory. In ], the country of ] was formed, the nation included several minorities. In the easternmost end of the country, ] lived the ] population. For most of their history they were ruiled by the Hungarians, who unlike the Austrians ruling ] were quite active in opposing Ukrainophile sentiments. Instead, the Hungarians supported a Rusyn identity (separate from either a pro-Ukrainian or pro-Russian orientation) through pro-Hungarian priests in an effort to separate the Ruthenian people under their rule from their brethren across the mountains.<ref name=Subtelny>{{cite book| author=Subtelny, O. | title=Ukraine: A History| location= Toronto | publisher= University of Toronto Press | year = 1988| }}</ref> Thus despite being Uniate at the time of the formation of Czechoslovakia, the population was about evenly divided between Rusynophile, Ukrainophile and Russophile orientation. The general Russophilic sentiment was very strong amongst them, and these cultural and political orientation impacted the local religious communities. Even before the first world war already quite a lot of distant mountain communities were de facto Orthodox, where priests simply ceased to follow the Uniate canons. However, much more significant changes took place in the interwar period. The redrawal of national boundaries following World War I also affected yet another ethnically Ruthenian territory. In 1920, the country of ] was formed, the nation included several minorities. In the easternmost end of the country, ] lived the ] population. For most of their history they were ruled by the Hungarians, who unlike the Austrians ruling Galicia were quite active in opposing Ukrainophile sentiments. Instead, the Hungarians supported a Rusyn identity (separate from either a pro-Ukrainian or pro-Russian orientation) through pro-Hungarian priests in an effort to separate the Ruthenian people under their rule from their brethren across the mountains.<ref name="autogenerated2" /> Thus despite being Uniate at the time of the formation of Czechoslovakia, the population was about evenly divided between Rusynophile, Ukrainophile and Russophile orientation. The general Russophilic sentiment was very strong amongst them, and these cultural and political orientations impacted the local religious communities. Even before the first world war already quite a lot of distant mountain communities were de facto Orthodox, where priests simply ceased to follow the Uniate canons. However, much more significant changes took place in the interwar period.


In the ]s many Russian emigres, particularly Orthodox clergy, settled in ]. Loyal to the Orthodox state, they became actively involved in missionary work in central Europe. A group, headed by Bishop Dosifei went to Transcarpathia. Because of the historical links between the local Greek Catholic clergy to the disliked Hungarian authorities, mass conversions to the Orthodox Church occurred. By the start of the ], approximately one third of all of the ] population reverted to Orthodoxy . The region's local Hungarian population, estimated at slightly less than 20% of the population, remained overhwlemingly Calvinist or Roman Catholic. (For the Ruthenian population left outside Ukraine in 1945 (Preshov territory in Slovakia) see ]) In the 1920s many Russian emigres, particularly Orthodox clergy, settled in ]. Loyal to the Orthodox state, they became actively involved in missionary work in central Europe. A group, headed by Bishop Dosifei went to Transcarpathia. Because of the historical links between the local Greek Catholic clergy to the disliked Hungarian authorities, mass conversions to the Orthodox Church occurred. By the start of the Second World War, approximately one third of all of the Rusyn population reverted to Orthodoxy . The region's local Hungarian population, estimated at slightly less than 20% of the population, remained overwhelmingly Calvinist or Catholic. (For the Ruthenian population left outside Ukraine in 1945 (today ] in Slovakia) see ]).


===Second World War=== ===Second World War===


In September ] the ] ] and the eastern territories were annexed into the Soviet republics of ] and ]. Since the Ukrainians were in large, discontent with Polish rule most of the Orthodox clergy actually welcomed the Soviet Troops. On September 17, 1939, with ] that started the Second World War, the ] attacked ], assigning territories with an ethnic Ukrainian majority to ]. Because the Ukrainians were by-and-large discontented with Polish rule most of the Orthodox clergy actually welcomed the Soviet troops.


With the addition of the ethnic Ukrainian territory of ] to the USSR, this created several issues. Having avoided the Bolshevik repression the Orthodox church of this rural region outnumbered the rest of the ] by nearly a thousand Churches and Clergy as well as many cloisters including the ]. The ecclestical link with ] was immediately restored. Within months nearely a million Orthodox pilgrims, from all over the country, fearing that these reclaimed western parishes would share the fate of others in the ], took the chance to visit them. However the Soviet authorities, although confiscating some of the public property, did not show the repressions of the post-revolutionary period that many expected and no executions or physical destruction took place. The addition of the ethnic Ukrainian territory of Volhynia to the USSR created several issues. Having avoided the Bolshevik repression, the Orthodox church of this rural region outnumbered the rest of the Ukrainian SSR by nearly a thousand churches and clergy as well as many cloisters including the ]. The ecclesiastical link with the Moscow Patriarchate was immediately restored. Within months nearly a million Orthodox pilgrims, from all over the country, fearing that these reclaimed western parishes would share the fate of others in the ], took the chance to visit them. However, the Soviet authorities, although confiscating some of the public property, did not show the repressions of the post-revolutionary period that many expected and no executions or physical destruction took place.


On ], ] Archbishop Nikanor and Bishop Mstyslav (later a ]) of the UAOC and Metropolitan Oleksiy (Hromadsky) of the Ukrainian Autonomous Orthodox Church concluded an ], uniting the two national churches at the ]. Later ] occupation authorities and pro-Russian hierarchs of the Autonomous Church convinced Metropolitan Oleksiy to remove his signature. Metropolitan Oleksiy was murdered in ] on ], ] by the nationalists of the ] which saw this as treason. On October 8, 1942, Archbishop Nikanor and ] (later a ]) of the UAOC and Metropolitan Oleksiy (Hromadsky) of the ] concluded an Act of Union, uniting the two national churches at the Pochayiv Lavra. Later ] occupation authorities and pro-Russian hierarchs of the Autonomous Church convinced Metropolitan Oleksiy to remove his signature. Metropolitan Oleksiy was murdered in Volhynia on May 7, 1943, by the nationalists of the ] which saw this as treason.


===Post War Situations=== ===Post-war situations===
]]]
The Russian Orthodox Church regained its general monopoly in the ] after ] following another shift in the official Soviet attitude towards Christian churches. As a result many started to accuse it of being a ] of the ]. After the suspicious death of Patriarch Tikhon, the UAOC and UGCC sought to avoid the transfer under the Moscow Patriarchate; something that Moscow tolerated until after World War II, for example the head of the Ukrainian Communist Party, ] attended the funeral of the head of the Uniate Church in ]. Nevertheless as the Uniate Church did in some cases support the Nazi regime, the overall Soviet attitude was negative. In ] a small group of priests started to proclaim a reunion with Orthodoxy. The Soviet state organized in ] a synod in ], where the ] ] was annulled. Thereby breaking the canonical ties with ] and transferring under the Moscow Patriarchate. In Transcarpathia, the reigning Greek Catholic bishop was murdered and the remaining priests were forced to return their Church to Orthodoxy. This move's acceptance was mixed. With many clergy members and lay believers turning to the ROC, some adamantly refused. As a result of this the Patriarchate of Moscow could now legally lay claim to any Orthodox church property that was within the territory of its uncontested jurisdiction, which it did. Some believers refused to accept liquidation of their churches and for nearly 40 years the UAOC and UGCC existed in Western Ukraine underground lead by the clergy members under the threat of prosecution by the Soviet state. Much of the UGCC and UAOC clergy not willing to serve in the ROC emigrated to ], the ], or ]. Others were sent to Siberia and even chose to be martyred . Officially the Moscow Patriarchate never recognised the canonical right of the synod as it lacked any bishops there.
The Russian Orthodox Church regained its general monopoly in the Ukrainian SSR after World War II following another shift in the official Soviet attitude towards Christian churches. As a result, many started to accuse it of being a ] of the ]. After the suspicious death of Patriarch Tikhon, the UAOC and UGCC sought to avoid the transfer under the Moscow Patriarchate; something that Moscow tolerated until after World War II, for example the head of the Ukrainian Communist Party, ] attended the funeral of the head of the Uniate Church in 1946. Nevertheless, as the Uniate Church did in some cases support the Nazi regime, the overall Soviet attitude was negative. In 1948 a small group of priests started to proclaim a reunion with Orthodoxy. The Soviet state organized in 1948 a synod in Lviv, where the 1596 Union of Brest was annulled, thereby breaking the canonical ties with ] and transferring under the Moscow Patriarchate. In Transcarpathia, the reigning Greek Catholic bishop, ], was murdered and the remaining priests were forced to return their Church to Orthodoxy. This move's acceptance was mixed. With many clergy members and lay believers turning to the ROC, some adamantly refused. As a result of this the Patriarchate of Moscow could now legally lay claim to any Orthodox church property that was within the territory of its uncontested jurisdiction, which it did. Some believers refused to accept liquidation of their churches and for nearly 40 years the UAOC and UGCC existed in Western Ukraine underground led by the clergy members under the threat of prosecution by the Soviet state. Much of the UGCC and UAOC clergy not willing to serve in the ROC emigrated to Germany, the United States, or Canada. Others were sent to Siberia and even chose to be martyred. Officially the Moscow Patriarchate never recognised the canonical right of the synod as it lacked any bishops there.


The relatively permissive post-war government attitude towards the Orthodox Church came to an end with ]'s "Thaw" programme, which included closing the recently opened Kiev's Caves Lavra. However in the west-Ukrainian dioceses, which were the largest in the USSR, the Soviet attitude was "softest". In fact in the western city of Lviv, only one church was closed. The Moscow Patriarchate also relaxed its canons on the clergy, especially those from the former-uniate territories, allowing them, for example to shave beards (a very uncommon Orthodox practice) and conduct liturgy in Ukrainian instead of Slavonic. The relatively permissive post-war government attitude towards the Orthodox Church came to an end with Khrushchev's "Thaw" programme, which included closing the recently opened Kiev's Caves Lavra. However, in the west-Ukrainian dioceses, which were the largest in the USSR, the Soviet attitude was "softest". In fact in the western city of Lviv, only one church was closed. The Moscow Patriarchate also relaxed its canons on the clergy, especially those from the former-uniate territories, allowing them, for example to shave beards (a very uncommon Orthodox practice) and conduct eulogy in Ukrainian instead of ].


===Late Soviet period=== ===Late Soviet period===
In ] with the millennium anniversary of the baptism of ], there was yet another shift in the Soviet attitude towards religion, coinciding with the ] and ] programmes. The Soviet Government publicly apologized for oppression of religion and promised to return all property to the rightful owners. As a result thousands of closed religious buildings in all areas of the USSR were returned to their original owners. In Ukraine this was the then ROC's ], which took place in the central, eastern and southern Ukraine. In the former-uniate areas of western Ukraine things were more turbulent. As UGCC survived in diaspora and in the underground they took their chance and were immediately revived in Ukraine, where in the wake of general liberalization of the Soviet policies in the late-1980s also prompted the activization of Ukrainian national political movements. The ] became viewed by some as an attribute of Soviet domination, and bitter, often violent clashes over church buildings followed with the ROC slowly losing its parishes to the UGCC. In 1988 with the millennium anniversary of the baptism of Rus, there was yet another shift in the Soviet attitude towards religion, coinciding with the ] and ] programmes. The Soviet Government publicly apologized for oppression of religion and promised to return all property to the rightful owners. As a result, thousands of closed religious buildings in all areas of the USSR were returned to their original owners. In Ukraine this was the then ROC's Ukrainian Exarchate, which took place in the central, eastern and southern Ukraine. In the former-uniate areas of western Ukraine things were more turbulent. As UGCC survived in diaspora and in the underground they took their chance and were immediately revived in Ukraine, where in the wake of general liberalization of the Soviet policies in the late-1980s the activization of Ukrainian national political movements was also prompted. The Russian Orthodox Church became viewed by some as an attribute of Soviet domination, and bitter, often violent clashes over church buildings followed with the ROC slowly losing its parishes to the UGCC.


The UAOC also did not wait long and quickly followed suit. Sometimes possessors of Church buildings changed several times within days. Although the Soviet law-enforcement did attempt to pacify the almost-warring parties, these were often unsuccessful, as many of the local branches in the ever-crumbling Soviet authority, sympathised with the national sentiments in their areas. Violence grew especially after the UGCC's demand that all property that was held prior to ] would be returned including the property that was initially of the Orthodox church. The UAOC also followed suit. Sometimes possessors of Church buildings changed several times within days. Although the Soviet law-enforcement did attempt to pacify the almost-warring parties, these were often unsuccessful, as many of the local branches in the ever-crumbling Soviet authority sympathised with the national sentiments in their areas. Violence grew especially after the UGCC's demand that all property that was held prior to 1939 would be returned.


It is now believed that the only real event which helped to contain the growing schism in the former-uniate territories was the ROC's reaction of raising its Ukrainian Exarchate to the status of an ], which took place in ], and up until the ] in late ] there was an uneasy peace in western Ukraine. However after the nation became independent, the question of an independent and an ] Orthodox Church arose once again. It is now believed that the only real event which helped to contain the growing schism in the former-uniate territories was the ROC's reaction of raising its Ukrainian Exarchate to the status of an ], which took place in 1990, and up until the ] in late 1991 there was an uneasy peace in western Ukraine. After the nation became independent, the question of an independent and an ] Orthodox Church arose once again.


===Post-Soviet period=== ===Post-Soviet period===


What historians now see as the reason for the following events was the decision of the head of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church Metropolitan of Kiev and all Ukraine ] to achieve total ] (independence) of his ] with or without the approval of the ] required by the ]. These events followed Filaret's own unsuccessful attempt to gain a seat of the ] to himself (]) and the Ukrainian independence following the ] in August, 1991. In November 1991 Metropolitan Filaret requested the hierarchy of the ] to grant the Ukrainian Orthodox Church autocephalous status. The skeptical hierarchy of the Russian Orthodox Church called for a full Synodical council (Sobor) where this issue would have been discussed at length. Filaret, using his support from the old friendship ties with the then newly elected ] (]), convinced him that a new independent government should have its own independent church. Despite the unpopularity of the UAOC outside ], Filaret managed to organise a covert communion with the UAOC in case ] refused. In November 1991, ], the Metropolitan of Kyiv, asked the hierarchy of the Russian Orthodox Church to grant the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) autocephalous status. The skeptical hierarchy of the Russian Orthodox Church called for a full ] where this issue would have been discussed at length. Filaret, using his support from the old friendship-ties with the then newly elected ] (]), convinced Kravchuk that a new independent government should have its own independent church.


In January 1992 Filaret convened an assembly at the ] that adopted a request of autocephaly for Ukrainians, addressed to the Moscow Patriarch.<ref>
At the synod in March-April of ], however, most of the clergy of the UOC who initially supported Filaret, openely criticised this move and immediately put most of the other bishops against him. Questions of his upopular disregard to ] (having a ]) as well as the allegations of improper financial dealings with the church finances made the council vote for Filaret to retire from his position which was confirmed by a sworn oath.
, '']'' (26 October 2018).</ref><ref>{{in lang|uk}} , ] (14 September 2018).
</ref>


] in Kyiv, built between 1862 and 1882 in honour of the 900th anniversary of the ] as a jewel of ], became a ]. ]]
Upon returning to ] Filaret carried out his reserve option revealing that the retirement swore was given under pressure and that he is not resigning. The Ukrainian president ] gave Filaret his utmost support as did the ], in retaining his rank. In a crisis moment the Hierarchical Council of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, agreed for another ] which met in May 1992 (real fear for the clergy's security forced them to conduct the council in the eastern city of ]) where the majority of the bishops voted to suspend Filaret from his clerical functioning. Simultaneously they elected a new leader ], native of the ] and a former Patriarchal Exarch to ].


Upon returning to Kyiv from a Russian Orthodox Church synod meeting, Filaret carried out his reserve option: he revealed that his resignation from the position of Primate of the UOC had taken place under pressure and that he would not resign. The Ukrainian President Leonid Kravchuk gave Filaret his support, as did the ], in retaining his rank. In a crisis moment the Hierarchical Council of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church agreed to another ] which met in May 1992. The council convened in the eastern city of ], where the majority of the bishops voted to suspend Filaret from his clerical functioning. Simultaneously they elected a new leader, ], native of the ] and a former Patriarchal Exarch to Western Europe.
With only three bishops remaining at his support Filaret initiated the unification with the UAOC, and in June 1992 creating a new ] (UOC-KP) with 94-year-old ] as a leader. While chosen as his assistant, Filaret was de-facto ruling the Church. A few of the Autocephalous ]s and clergy who opposed such situation refused to join the new Church and following the death of Mstyslav a year later. The church was once again ripped through a schism and most of the UAOC parishes were regained when the churches re-separated in July ].


With only three bishops giving him support, Filaret initiated unification with the UAOC, and in June 1992 established a new ] (UOC-KP) with 94-year-old ] of the UAOC as a leader. While chosen as Mstyslav's assistant, Filaret ''de facto'' ruled the new Church. A few of the Autocephalous ]s and clergy who opposed such situation refused to join the new church, even after the death of Mstyslav in June 1993. The church was once again ripped apart by a schism and most of the UAOC parishes were regained when the churches re-separated in July 1993.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.pomisna.info/uk/episcopate-post/filaret-denisenko/|title=Filaret (Denysenko)|website=www.pomisna.info}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com/display.asp?linkpath=pages%5CU%5CK%5CUkrainianOrthodoxchurch.htm|title=Ukrainian Orthodox church|website=www.encyclopediaofukraine.com|access-date=9 January 2019}}</ref><ref name=":25">{{cite web|url=https://mospat.ru/en/2018/10/22/news165617/|title=Metropolitan Hilarion: Filaret Denisenko was and remains a schismatic|date=22 October 2018|website=mospat.ru|access-date=29 October 2018}}</ref>
Most of the fate of control of church buildings was decided by the church parishes, but as most refused to follow Filaret, paramilitaries, especially in ] and ] Oblasts where there was strong nationalist sympathy amongst the new regional authorities, carried out raids bringing property under their control. The lack of parishes in eastern and southern Ukraine prompted President Kravchuk to intervene and force the still closed buildings since the Communist times to re-open under the UOC-KP's ownership. Upon the 1995 election of ], most of the violence was promptly stopped, and the presidency adopted a de-facto neutrality regime to all the four major church groups.


Most of the fate of control of church buildings was decided by the church parishes, but as most refused to follow Filaret, paramilitaries, especially in ] and ]s where there was strong nationalist sympathy amongst the new regional authorities, carried out raids bringing property under their control. The lack of parishes in eastern and southern Ukraine prompted ] to intervene and to force buildings still closed from the Communist era to re-open under the UOC-KP's ownership. Upon the 1994 election of ] as President of Ukraine, most of the violence was promptly stopped, and the presidency adopted a ''de facto'' neutrality attitude to all the four major church groups.
==Modern Times==
] (right) of the ] and ] of the ].]]
The recent events of the ] and the ] affected the religious affairs in the nation as well. As the UOC-KP, UAOC, and UGCC actively supported the opposition candidate ], the current ], the UOC (MP) supported the former Prime minister ], who was running against him. After Yushchenko's victory, the UOC (MP) criticised him for what they see as support of the "uncanonical organisations" like celebrating Orthodox Christmas in ] (owned by UOC-KP). However, Yushchenko himself, a devote Orthodox Christian and a practicing member of a UOC-MP parish, attempts to distance himself from conflicts between churches, at least publicly, as he pledged to do during his presidential campaign. The President did claim that his intention was to achieve a unity of the nation's Eastern Orhtodox Church affairs. However questions still arise on what will be the ecclestical status of the Church and who will head it.


===Modern times===
One of the biggest recent controversies involved having the almost exclusively western Ukraine based UGCC move its administrative centre from ] to ] whilst their new cathedral's construction was sponsored by the first lady, ].
<!-- Deleted image removed: ] (right) of the ] and ] of the ].]] -->
The recent events of the ] and the ] affected the religious affairs in the nation as well. Members of the UOC (MP) actively supported the former Prime minister ] while members of the UOC-KP, UAOC, and UGCC supported the opposition candidate ], who was running against him. After Yushchenko's victory, the UOC (MP) criticised him for what they see as support of the "uncanonical organisations", such as his celebrating Orthodox Christmas in ] (owned by UOC-KP). Yushchenko himself has publicly pledged to distance himself from Orthodox politics during his presidential campaign.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Mefford |first1=Brian |title=Rethinking Yushchenko |url=https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/rethinking-yushchenko/ |website=Atlantic Council |access-date=August 31, 2024 |date=February 23, 2021}}</ref> Nonetheless, he claims that his intention is to achieve a unity of the nation's Eastern Orthodox Church affairs. Questions still arise on what will be the ecclesiastical status of the Church and who will head it, and as of February 2007 no public dialogue has begun.


To date the issue between rivalries of different churches remains politicised and sensitive and also controversial. In a 2007 survey 33.3% felt satisfied with the current condition of several Orthodox Churches. At the same time up to 42.1% felt it would be important for a single united church, with 30.7% favoring the UOC-KP and 11.4% the UOC (MP). On the question of who shall head the church the political polarisation of the country surfaced - 56.1% of voters of ] and 40.7% of voters from the ] endorsed wanting one Orthodox Church under the Kyiv Patriarchate.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://obozrevatel.com/news/2007/1/24/153223.htm |title=У Московського Патріархату - серйозні проблеми в Україні - Обозреватель |publisher=Obozrevatel.com |date=2007-01-24 |access-date=2019-01-16}}</ref>
Presentely the situation remains extremely politicised and sensitive. The present situation of Ukrainian Christianity is such:


On 15 December 2018, members of the existing Ukrainian Orthodox churches (the UOC-KP, the UAOC and two bishops who had left the UOC) voted through their representatives (bishops) to unite into the Orthodox Church of Ukraine on the basis of complete canonical independence. They elected their primate and adopted a charter for the Orthodox Church of Ukraine.<ref name=":5" /><ref name=":8">{{Cite journal |last=Piter234903 |date=2018-12-15 |title=Statut |url=https://www.slideshare.net/Piter234903/statut-125970133?ref=https://www.rbc.ua/ukr/news/poyavilsya-ustav-pravoslavnoy-tserkvi-ukrainy-1544905888.html |website=www.slideshare.net |access-date=2019-01-10 |archive-date=2020-07-26 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200726135634/https://www.slideshare.net/Piter234903/statut-125970133?ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rbc.ua%2Fukr%2Fnews%2Fpoyavilsya-ustav-pravoslavnoy-tserkvi-ukrainy-1544905888.html |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name=":7" />
===] ===
]
Abbreveated as UOC, (sometimes referred to as UOC (MP)), operates as an ] church under the ]. The ] is enthroned since spring ] as the head of the UOC under the title ''"Blessed Metropolitan of Kiev and all Ukraine"''. Presentely is the largest religious body and currentely has the leading amount of parishes (more than half).
] of the UOC-KP, who had been chosen on 13 December by the UOC-KP as its only candidate, and was considered as Filaret's right arm<ref name=":32">{{cite web|url=https://orthodoxie.com/en/bishop-epiphaniy-dumenko-elected-primate-of-the-orthodox-church-in-ukraine/|last=Panev|first=Jivko|title=Bishop Epiphaniy (Dumenko) elected Primate of the "Orthodox Church in Ukraine"|date=2018-12-15|website=Orthodoxie|language=en-US|access-date=17 February 2021}}</ref> and protégé,<ref name=":2">{{cite web|url=http://euromaidanpress.com/2018/12/16/history-in-the-making-future-ukrainian-orthodox-church-elects-its-primate/|title=History in the making: future Ukrainian Orthodox Church elects its Primate {{!}}|last=Alya|first=Shandra|date=2018-12-16|website=Euromaidan Press|language=en-US|access-date=2018-12-17}}</ref> was elected Metropolitan of Kyiv and all Ukraine by the unification council on 15 December 2018 after the second round of voting.<ref name=":82">{{cite web|url=https://risu.ua/en/metropolitan-epifaniy-dumenko-becomes-primate-of-one-local-orthodox-church-of-ukraine_n95137|last=Ukrainian Catholic University|title=Metropolitan Epifaniy (Dumenko) becomes Primate of One Local Orthodox Church of Ukraine|date=15 December 2018|access-date=17 February 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.interfax-religion.com/?act=news&div=14776|last=Interfax Religion|title=Metropolitan Epiphany of "Kyiv Patriarchate" elected as leader of "local Orthodox church" in Ukraine|date=15 December 2018|access-date=17 February 2021}}</ref>


On 1 January 2019, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew confirmed his intention to grant the tomos of autocephaly to Metropolitan Epiphany on 6 January 2019, ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://risu.ua/en/at-new-year-ceremony-patriarch-bartholomew-confirms-his-intention-to-give-tomos-before-christmas_n95501|last=Ukrainian Catholic University|title=At New Year ceremony, Patriarch Bartholomew confirms his intention to give Tomos before Christmas|date=2 January 2019|access-date=17 February 2021}}</ref>
Geographically its main areas of support are the Russophone eastern and southern regions where its percentage of parishes peaks between 80 to 90 and 70 to 80 respectfully. In the central and Volhynian western provinces this falls from 60 to 70 percent. In ] and in ] city this further drops to about half of all the parishes. And in the Galician districts this falls bellow 10 percent. Presently the Church lacks any parishes abroad, as its followers identify under the same umberella as those of the ], and likewise are members of the latter's abroad parishes.


On 5 January 2019, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew and Metropolitan Epiphanius celebrated a Divine Liturgy in ] in Istanbul; the tomos was signed thereafter, also in St. George's Cathedral.<ref name=":1" />
===]===
Abbreveated as the UOC-KP, the church was created in ], and claims to have equal standing (though ] unrecognised) amongst other ]. Since ] UOC-KP is headed by ] who until ] was a ''Metropolitan of Kiev and Halych (Galich)'' under the ROC, which ]ed him in ] and ]d in ] "for schismatic activities".


The ''tomos'' "has come into force from the moment of its signing".<ref name=":1">{{cite web|url=https://risu.ua/en/patriarch-bartholomew-signs-tomos-of-autocephaly-of-orthodox-church-of-ukraine_n95554|last=Ukrainian Catholic University|title=Patriarch Bartholomew signs Tomos of autocephaly of Orthodox Church of Ukraine|date=5 January 2019|access-date=17 February 2021}}</ref><ref name=":9" /> The signing of the ''tomos'' officially established the autocephalous Orthodox Church of Ukraine.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.la-croix.com/Religion/Orthodoxie/LEglise-dUkraine-officiellement-creee-patriarche-Bartholomee-2019-01-05-1200993367|last=La Croix (with Agence France Presse)|title=L'Église d'Ukraine officiellement créée par le patriarche Bartholomée|newspaper=La Croix|date=5 January 2019|language=fr|trans-title=The church of Ukraine officially created by Patriarch Bartholomew|access-date=17 February 2021}}</ref> President Poroshenko traveled to Istanbul to attend the signing ceremony.<ref name="auto">{{cite web|url=https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-polytics/2613931-prezident-ukraini-pribuv-u-stambul.html|script-title=uk:Президент України прибув у Стамбул|date=5 January 2019|website=www.ukrinform.ua|language=uk|trans-title=President of Ukraine arrived in Istanbul|access-date=2019-01-05}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/prezident-u-stambuli-vzyav-uchast-v-urochistomu-vruchenni-to-52382|title=President took part in the solemn handing over of the Tomos of autocephaly of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church in Istanbul|date=6 January 2019|website=Official website of the President of Ukraine|language=en|access-date=2019-01-06}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/nareshti-gospod-poslav-nam-pravoslavnu-cerkvu-ukrayini-petro-52358|title=Petro Poroshenko at the ceremony of signing the Tomos: At last, God has bestowed the Orthodox Church of Ukraine upon us|date=5 January 2019|website=Official website of the President of Ukraine|language=en|access-date=2019-01-05}}</ref>
Geographically the church's main areas of support are the Volhynian districts (where it holds from 30 to 40% parishes) and the capital ]. The church enjoyes moderate support in the central and Galician provinces (ranging from 30 to 15 percent). The church also contains several abroad parishes in the west and in Russia, where it has agreed to annex some of the priests that have been ]d by the ROC for various breaking of canonic laws.


After the ''tomos'' was signed, Ecumenical Patriarch Batholomew made an address to Metropolitan Epiphanius.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://risu.ua/en/patriarch-bartholomew-prince-vladimir-and-saint-olga-are-present-in-spirit-and-prayer-sharing-our-joy-and-pleasure_n95557|last=Ukrainian Catholic University|title=Patriarch Bartholomew: "Prince Vladimir and Saint Olga are present in spirit and prayer, sharing our joy and pleasure"|date=5 January 2019|access-date=17 February 2021}}</ref> President Poroshenko<ref>{{cite web|url=https://risu.ua/sered-15-zirok-avtokefalnih-pravoslavnih-cerkov-z-yavilasya-ukrajinska-zirochka-petro-poroshenko_n95556|last=Ukrainian Catholic University|title=Серед 15 зірок автокефальних православних Церков з'явилася українська зірочка!, – Петро Порошенко|date=5 January 2019|trans-title=Among the 15 stars of the Autocephalous Orthodox Churches there was a Ukrainian star ! – Petro Poroshenko|access-date=17 February 2021}}</ref> and Metropolitan Epiphanius also made speeches.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://risu.ua/en/metropolitan-epifaniy-thanked-patriarch-bartholomew-for-signing-the-tomos_n95565|title=Metropolitan Epifaniy thanked Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew for signing the Tomos|date=5 January 2019|access-date=17 February 2021}}</ref> On 6 January, after a Liturgy celebrated by Metropolitan Epiphanius and Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew read the ''tomos'' of the ] and then gave it to Metropolitan Epiphanius.<ref name=":9">{{cite web|url=https://risu.ua/en/ukraine-receives-tomos-officially-and-forever_n95590|last=Ukrainian Catholic University|title=Ukraine receives Tomos officially and forever|date=6 January 2019|access-date=17 February 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.unian.info/society/10400271-ecumenical-patriarch-hands-tomos-of-autocephaly-over-to-leader-of-orthodox-church-of-ukraine-video-photos.html|last=Unian Information Agency|title=Ecumenical Patriarch hands tomos of autocephaly over to leader of Orthodox Church of Ukraine (Video, photos)|date=6 January 2019|language=en|access-date=17 February 2021}}</ref> President Poroshenko was present during the signing and handing over of the tomos.<ref name="auto" /><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/prezident-u-stambuli-vzyav-uchast-v-urochistomu-vruchenni-to-52382|title=President took part in the solemn handing over of the Tomos of autocephaly of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church in Istanbul|date=6 January 2019|website=Official website of the President of Ukraine|language=en|access-date=2019-01-07}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/nareshti-gospod-poslav-nam-pravoslavnu-cerkvu-ukrayini-petro-52358|title=Petro Poroshenko at the ceremony of signing the Tomos: At last, God has bestowed the Orthodox Church of Ukraine upon us|date=5 January 2019|website=Official website of the President of Ukraine|language=en|access-date=2019-01-07}}</ref>
===]===
Abbreveated as the UAOC, the church was established and re-established several times in Ukraine. Originally formed in the 1920s, and encouraged by communists before being destroyed and forced into exile. Then once again re-establishing on the Nazi occupied territories during ], and again driven underground following the ]'s liberation of Ukraine. Finally re-gaining its official recognition in the late ], it was initially ruled from abroad by ] and then following his death in ] re-established itself as an independent church, following the brief union with the UOC-KP. Since then the church has been more successful in dialogue with the UOC (MP).


On 9 January 2019, the tomos was brought back to Istanbul so that all the members of the ] could sign the tomos. The tomos has now been fully ratified, and will be returned again to Kyiv where it will remain permanently.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://risu.ua/en/ukrainian-tomos-signed-by-all-members-of-holy-synod-of-ecumenical-patriarchate_n95657|last=Ukrainian Catholic University|title=Ukrainian Tomos signed by all members of Holy Synod of Ecumenical Patriarchate|date=9 January 2019|access-date=17 February 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.unian.info/politics/10402590-tomos-for-ukraine-church-signed-by-all-members-of-constantinople-synod.html|last=Unian Information Agency|title=Tomos for Ukraine Church signed by all members of Constantinople Synod|date=9 January 2019|language=en|access-date=17 February 2021}}</ref><ref name=":10">{{cite web|url=https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/archbishop-members-of-ecumenical-patriarchates-synod-sign-public-copy-of-tomos-for-ukraine.html|title=Archbishop: Members of Ecumenical Patriarchate's Synod sign public copy of tomos for Ukraine|date=2019-01-09|website=KyivPost|access-date=2019-01-09}}</ref> The representative of the press service of the OCU, priest Ivan Sydor, said the tomos was valid after the signature of the Ecumenical Patriarch, "but according to the procedure, there must also be the signatures of those bishops who take part in the synod of the Constantinople Patriarchate."<ref name=":10" /> Former press secretary of the UOC-KP, {{ill|Eustratius (Zorya)|uk|Євстратій (Зоря)|vertical-align=sup}}, declared the Ecumenical Patriarch recognized the OCU by signing the tomos of autocephaly and by concelebrating the liturgy with ] while considering Epiphanius as primate of the OCU.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://zik.ua/news/2019/01/09/v_ptsu_poyasnyly_chomu_tomos_shche_raz_povertavsya_u_stambul_1484681|script-title=uk:В ПЦУ пояснили, чому томос ще раз повертався у Стамбул|date=9 January 2019|website=zik.ua|language=uk|access-date=2019-01-09|archive-date=2019-01-09|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190109191520/https://zik.ua/news/2019/01/09/v_ptsu_poyasnyly_chomu_tomos_shche_raz_povertavsya_u_stambul_1484681|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name=":14">{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/news-46800260|title=Що з підписами під томосом і чому його повертають до Стамбула|date=2019-01-08|work=BBC News Україна|access-date=2019-01-09|language=en-GB}}</ref> The Ecumenical Patriarchate declared on 8 January 2018 that the tomos was "approved and valid" and that the signing by the whole synod was a "purely technical step". It added that Ukraine had asked for the tomos to be brought to Ukraine for Christmas instead of leaving it in Istanbul for a few days until the whole synod signed it.<ref name=":14" />
Geographically the church operates almost exclussively in the western Galcian provinces with minute support elsewhere. The church used to have a lot of parishes abroad in the Ukrainian emigre communities in Canada and in the United States which now formed two separate churches: the ] and ]. In 1995 the ] accepted the latter churches under his patronage citing the transfer controversy of the Kiev Metropolitan's see to ] in 1686 and, thus, fulfilling a necessary step for the achievement of the canonical standing by these diaspora (still not universally recognised). While this move, as well as the cited reason, soured relations between the ] and the ROC (who refused to recognise it), the standing of the diaspora churches does not affect the status of the UAOC itself.


== Main religious groups ==
===]===
The main religious groups are presented below:
Abbreveated as the UGCC, and originally formed from the ]. The Church was re-established in ]. Since ] UGCC is headed by ] and ] ].


==={{anchor|Eastern Orthodox}}Eastern Orthodox===
Geographically, the Church's parishes are almost exclussively confined to the Western provinces of ], ] and ], as well as the ] areas in ]. In addition the church has mass parishes abroad in the North American continent, South America, and Australia.


==Other Christian groups in Ukraine== ====Orthodox Church of Ukraine====
] is used by the OCU as its ].]]
===]===
{{main|Orthodox Church of Ukraine}}
Roman Catholicism is predominantly practiced by non-Ukrainian minorities, like ] and ]. Originally holding a large amount of parishes, most of the buildings remain empty after ] which is attributed due to the ] and the ]
Abbreviated as the OCU, the church was established by a ] on 15 December 2018, and received its ] of ] (decree of ecclesial independence) by Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople on 5 January 2019. The council voted to unite the existing Ukrainian Orthodox jurisdictions: the Ukrainian Orthodox Church – Kyiv Patriarchate (UOC-KP), the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church (UAOC) and two bishops of the ] (UOC).


The ] of the church is the ]. The ] elected ] as its primate, previously the Metropolitan of ] and ] (UOC-KP) in 2018.
===]===
Following the fall of the Soviet Union, the Greek Catholic church in ] emerged from the underground and was restored as a Greek Catholic Church separate from the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church based in ] despite the protests of a portion of the Church members led by the bishop of Khust who demanded to be integrated into the ]. Despite this revival, unlike in Galicia there are only 60% as many Greek Catholic as there Orthodox parishes in Transcarpathia.


Orthodox Ukrainians of the diaspora are subject to the jurisdiction of the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople.<ref name=":5">{{cite web|url=https://www.rbc.ua/ukr/news/poyavilsya-ustav-pravoslavnoy-tserkvi-ukrainy-1544905888.html|script-title=ru:Православна церква України буде автокефальною - статут (повний текст документу)|date=15 December 2018|website=РБК-Украина|language=ru|trans-title=The Orthodox Church of Ukraine will be autocephalous - the charter (full text of the document)|access-date=2018-12-30}}</ref><ref name=":7">{{cite web|url=http://spzh.news/ru/news/58371-smi-obnarodovali-projekt-ustava-pcu-prinyatyj-na-obedinitelynom-sobore|title=СМИ обнародовали проект устава ПЦУ, принятый на "объединительном Соборе"|date=16 December 2018|website=spzh.news|language=en|access-date=2018-12-30}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.interfax-religion.com/?act=news&div=14838|last=Interfax Religion|title=New church of Ukraine may not appoint bishops or establish parishes outside of Ukraine|date=5 January 2019|access-date=20 February 2021}}</ref>
===]===
Traditionally the Ukrainian clergy, following the annexation of Kievan Metropolia, were one of the main oppositions to the Old Believer schism which took place at the time, under ]. None of the Ukrainian parishes followed the ]. Although in ] the Tsar's decree on freedom of religion allowed the Old believer church to reform, it gained minute support in Ukraine. Presentely, however the Old Believer's community very much exploited the politicised schism in Ukrainian Orthodoxy and as of 2004 number 53 communities scattered throughout Ukraine, with one of the biggest in ].


====Ukrainian Orthodox Church====
=== Protestantism in Ukraine ===
{{main|Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate)}}
] of the UOC]]


The Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC), operates as an ] church that was formerly part of the ] until declaring its full independence in 2022. The head of the church is ] who was enthroned in August 2014 as the ''"Metropolitan of Kyiv and all Ukraine"''. The UOC claims to be the largest religious body in Ukraine with the greatest number of parish churches and communities counting up to half of the total in Ukraine and totaling over 10 thousand. As of 2007, the UOC also claimed to have up to 75% of the Ukrainian population.<ref>Pravoslaviye v Ukraine {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071029043158/http://orthodox.org.ua/uk/node/197 |date=29 October 2007 }}</ref> Independent survey results, however, show significant variance, as many Orthodox Ukrainians do not clearly self-identify with a particular jurisdiction and, sometimes, are even unaware of the affiliation of the church they attend or the existence of the controversy itself. This makes it difficult to use survey numbers as an indicator of the relative strength of any given Church. Also, the geographical factor plays a major role in the number of adherents, as the Ukrainian population tends to be more churchgoing in the western part of the country rather than in the UOC's heartland in southern and eastern Ukraine.
In the 16th century small groups of ] appeared in ], but the influence of the ] in Ukraine remained marginal until the three centuries later.


Statistics on the number of parishes may be more reliable and consistent, even though they may not necessarily directly translate into the numbers of adherents. By number of parishes and quantity of church buildings, the UOC's strong base is central and north-western Ukraine. However, percentage wise (with respect to rival Orthodox Churches) its share of parishes there varies from 60 to 70 percent. At the same time, by percentage alone (with respect to rival Orthodox Churches) the UOC's share of church buildings peaks in the urban ] southern and eastern Ukrainian provinces, being as high as 90%. The same can be said about ], although there the UOC's main rival is the Greek Catholic Church and thus its share of ''total'' church buildings is only 40%. The capital Kyiv is where the greatest Orthodox rivalry takes place, with the UOC holding about half of the Orthodox communities there. The only places where the UOC is a true minority, in both quantity, percentage and support are the former Galician provinces of Western Ukraine. There the total share of parishes does not exceed more than five percent.
] arrived to Ukraine together with German immigrants in the 18th and 19th centuries. They were initially granted religious freedom by the Russian Imperial authorities, unlike the native population. While some were Roman Catholic, the majority were either Evangelical (in North America known as Lutheran) or Mennonite (Anabaptist). Of the 200,000 or so Germans in Volhynia c.1900, some 90% or so were Lutheran. Lutheranism went into a major decline with the emigration of most of the Germans out of the region during the World Wars but there are still small remnants today (2006) in the Odessa and Kiev regions.


On 27 May 2022, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) formally cut ties and declared independence from the Russian Orthodox Church.<ref name=":1b">{{Cite web |date=2022-05-27 |title=Resolution of the Council of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of May 27, 2022 |url=https://news.church.ua/2022/05/27/postanova-soboru-ukrajinskoji-pravoslavnoji-cerkvi-vid-27-travnya-2022-roku/ |access-date=2022-05-27 |website=Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate) |language=uk}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite news |date=2022-05-27 |title=Ukraine's Moscow-backed Orthodox church says cuts ties with Russia |work=Alarabiya News |url=https://english.alarabiya.net/News/world/2022/05/27/Ukraine-s-Moscow-backed-Orthodox-church-says-cuts-ties-with-Russia |access-date=2022-05-27}}</ref> Upon declaring its independence from the Moscow Patriarchate, the UOC began creating new parishes in Western Europe to serve Ukrainian refugees.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://news.church.ua/2022/05/28/resolutions-council-ukrainian-orthodox-church-may-27-2022/?lang=en | title=Resolutions of the Council of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of May 27, 2022 | date=28 May 2022 }}</ref> By the end of 2022, 32 such parishes had been organized,<ref>{{cite web | url=https://news.church.ua/2022/12/24/zvit-keruyuchogo-spravami-ukrajinskoji-pravoslavnoji-cerkvi-za-2022-rik/ | title=Звіт Керуючого справами Української Православної Церкви за 2022 рік | date=24 December 2022 }}</ref> and Bishop Veniamin (Voloshchuk) of Boyar was appointed to oversee the new diaspora parishes.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://news.church.ua/2023/01/03/slovo-na-vruchennya-zhezla-jepiskopu-boyarskomu-veniaminu-vikariyu-kijivskoji-mitropoliji/ | title=Слово на вручення жезла єпископу Боярському Веніаміну, вікарію Київської митрополії | date=3 January 2023 }}</ref> One UOC parish exists in North America and predates the war: Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary, in Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada.<ref>У Канаді відкрили перший храм УПЦ </ref>
One of earliest Protestant groups in Ukraine were ] (the name originated from the German ''Stunde'', "hour") German Evangelical sect that spread from German villages in ] and ] to the neighbouring Ukrainian population. Protestantism in Ukraine rapidly grew during the liberal reforms of ] in the 1860s. However, towards the end of the century authorities started to restrict Protestant ] of the Orthodox Christians, especially by the Studistis, routinely preventing prayer meetings and other activities. At the same time ], another major Protestant group that was growing in Ukraine, were treated less harshly due to their powerful international connections.

====Old Believers====
Traditionally the Ukrainian clergy, following the annexation of Kyivan Metropolia, were one of the main sources of opposition to the ] schism which took place at the time, under ]. None of the Ukrainian parishes followed the ]. Although in 1905 the Tsar's decree on freedom of religion allowed the Old Believers church to reform, it gained little support in Ukraine. Presently, however the Old Believer community very much exploited the politicised schism in Ukrainian Orthodoxy and, as of 2004, number 53 communities scattered throughout Ukraine, with one of the biggest in ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.starovery.ru/pravda/nzd.php?cid=81 |title=На злобу дня |publisher=Starovery.ru |access-date=2019-01-16}}</ref>

===Catholic Church===
{{main|Catholic Church in Ukraine}}

====Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church====
] is no longer the mother church of the UGCC, the Church's parish continues to be centered in Western Ukraine.]]

{{main|Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church}}

Abbreviated as the UGCC, and originally formed from the Union of Brest in 1596, the Church was outlawed by the Soviet government in 1948 but continued to exist in the Ukrainian underground and in the Western Ukrainian diaspora. It was officially re-established in Ukraine in 1989. In 1991, ] returned to Lviv from emigration. Since 2011 UGCC has been headed by ] ].

Currently the Ukrainian Greek Catholic church has 3317 parishes which makes it the third largest denomination in Ukraine.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.ugcc.org.ua/ukr/church/catholics/ |title=Ukrainian Catholic churches in Ukraine (in Ukrainian) |access-date=2007-11-24 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071116062329/http://www.ugcc.org.ua/ukr/church/catholics/ |archive-date=2007-11-16 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Geographically, the Church's parishes were previously confined to the Western provinces of Lviv, ] and ], where it has the most parishes of any Church and where its share of parishes ranges from 47% to 64%. The UGCC is also found in the neighboring ] areas in ]. Numerous surveys conducted since the late 1990s consistently show that between 6% and 8% of Ukraine's population, or 9.4% to 12.6% of religious believers, identify themselves as belonging to this Church.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927192925/http://www.risu.org.ua/eng/news/article;13940|date=2007-09-27}} </ref> In addition, the church has mass parishes abroad in the North American continent, South America, and Australia.

In recent times parishes have been established in many Eastern Ukrainian cities <ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.ugcc.org.ua/ukr/church_in_action/bishops/ |title=Eparchies in Ukraine (in Ukrainian) |access-date=2007-11-24 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071115125529/http://www.ugcc.org.ua/ukr/church_in_action/bishops/ |archive-date=2007-11-15 |url-status=dead }}</ref> such as Kharkiv, Donetsk, in the south in Odesa and Yalta and also in Russia.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ugcc-in-russia.narod.ru/ |title=Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church in Russia site (in Ukrainian) |publisher=Ugcc-in-russia.narod.ru |access-date=2019-01-16}}</ref> with parishes being set up in Moscow, Novosibirsk, Ufa, Cheliabinsk, Tomsk, and other cities. These parishes have been formed primarily by resettled Ukrainians from Western Ukraine.<!---COMMENTING OUT STRANGE AND UNREFED STATEMENT, to there are Orthodox churches that conduct liturgy in Ukrainian, no need to go to GC just for that--- but have also been attracting many Orthodox believers who desire to hear the liturgy in Ukrainian.--->

One of the largest religious controversies in Ukraine recently involved having the almost exclusively western Ukraine-based UGCC move its administrative centre from Lviv to Kyiv whilst its new cathedral's construction was sponsored by the first lady, ]. This move was criticised not only by the UOC(MP), but also by the whole Eastern Orthodox Communion.

====Latin Church====
{{main|Latin Church in Ukraine}}
]]]
The ] in Ukraine is predominantly populated by non-Ukrainian minorities, in particular ] and ].{{Citation needed|date=July 2010}} Originally holding a large number of parishes, most of the churches remained empty after World War II, which is attributed to the fact that much of the Polish population (once a significant minority, especially in the west of modern-day Ukraine) was killed in the war and the ] that occurred during the war as well as being subject to ].

After the restoration of ] in Western Ukraine since 1944, many Catholic churches and monasteries were compulsorily closed and clergy persecuted.<ref name="RISU-RC">{{Cite web |url=http://www.risu.org.ua/ukr/major.religions/rkc/ |title=Roman Catholicism in Ukraine, RISU Portal, in Ukrainian |access-date=2007-10-07 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20121222171258/http://www.risu.org.ua/ukr/major.religions/rkc/ |archive-date=2012-12-22 |url-status=dead }}</ref>

In 1991, ] officially restored the activities of Catholic Dioceses in Ukraine and appointed bishops.<ref name="RISU-RC" />
Currently the Catholic Church in Ukraine has 807 parishes in 713 churches.<ref>{{dead link|date=January 2019}}</ref>

====Ruthenian Greek Catholic Church====
{{main|Ruthenian Greek Catholic Church}}
Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the Byzantine rite Catholic church in ] emerged from the underground and was restored as a separate entity from the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church based in Galicia, namely the ]. This was done despite the protests by a portion of the Church members led by the bishop of Khust who demanded to be integrated into the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.rusyn.org/?root=rusyns&rusyns=religion&article=94 |title=Rusyn |publisher=Rusyn |access-date=2019-01-16 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927212133/http://www.rusyn.org/?root=rusyns&rusyns=religion&article=94 |archive-date=2007-09-27 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Despite this revival, unlike its sister Church in Galicia, the Ruthenian Byzantine rite Catholic Church has not regained its pre-war position as the dominant Church in Transcarpathia. It currently has about 23% of Transcarpathia's parishes, slightly less than 60% of the Orthodox total there.<ref>{{dead link|date=January 2019}}</ref> Its traditional base is the Rusyn (Ruthenian) ethnic minority in Transcarpathia.

=== Protestantism ===
{{Main|Protestants in Ukraine}}
{{unreferenced section|date=July 2024}}
In the 16th century small groups of ] appeared in ], but the influence of the ] in Ukraine remained marginal until three centuries later.{{cn|date=August 2024}}

Protestantism arrived to Ukraine together with German immigrants in the 18th and 19th centuries. They were initially granted religious freedom by the Russian Imperial authorities, unlike the native population. While some were Catholic, the majority were either Evangelical (in North America known as Lutheran) or Mennonite (Anabaptist). Of the 200,000 or so Germans in Volhynia c.1900, some 90% or so were Lutheran. Lutheranism went into a major decline with the emigration of most of the Germans out of the region during the World Wars but there are still small remnants today (2006) in the Odesa and Kyiv regions.

One of earliest Protestant groups in Ukraine were ] (the name originated from the German ''Stunde'', "hour") German Evangelical sect that spread from German villages in ] and ] to the neighbouring Ukrainian population. Protestantism in Ukraine rapidly grew during the liberal reforms of ] in the 1860s. However, towards the end of the century authorities started to restrict Protestant ] of the Orthodox Christians, especially by the Stundists, routinely preventing prayer meetings and other activities. At the same time ], another major Protestant group that was growing in Ukraine, were treated less harshly due to their powerful international connections.


In the early 20th century, ] became the main centre of the spread of Protestantism in Ukraine. During the Soviet period Protestantism, together with Orthodox Christianity, was persecuted in Ukraine, but the 1980s marked the start of another major expansion of Protestant proselytism in Ukraine. In the early 20th century, ] became the main centre of the spread of Protestantism in Ukraine. During the Soviet period Protestantism, together with Orthodox Christianity, was persecuted in Ukraine, but the 1980s marked the start of another major expansion of Protestant proselytism in Ukraine.


Today largest Protestant groups in Ukraine include Baptists (All-Ukrainian Union of the Association of Evangelical Baptists), ] (All-Ukrainian Union of Christians of the Evangelical Faith-Pentecostals) and ] (Ukrainian Union Conference of Seventh-day Adventists). Of note is ] church in Kiev. One of the most prominent Protestants in modern Ukraine is the practicing baptist pastor ], after the ] the head of the ], Ukraine's successor to the ]. Despite the rapid growth and aggressive missionary activities, today Protestants in Ukraine remain a small minority in a largely Orthodox Christian country. Today the largest Protestant groups in Ukraine include Baptists (All-Ukrainian Union of the Association of Evangelical Baptists), ] (All-Ukrainian Union of Christians of the Evangelical Faith-Pentecostals), ] (Ukrainian Union Conference of Seventh-day Adventists) and a growing number of charismatic churches. Of note is the ] in Kyiv. One of the most prominent Protestants in modern Ukraine is a practising Baptist pastor ], former head of the ], Ukraine's successor to the ]. Despite recent rapid growth, Protestants in Ukraine still remain a small minority in a largely Orthodox Christian country.


==See also== ==See also==
* ]
{{Ukrainian topics}}
* ]

{{portalbar|History|Christianity|Ukraine}}


==References== ==References==
{{refbegin}}
;'''Inline:'''
<references/>
;'''General:'''
*{{en icon}}
*{{ru icon}}''Yuriy Chernomorets.'' "Social base of the Ukrainian orthodoxy", March 2005,
*{{ru icon}}''Orhodox Encyclopedia'' Published by the Russian Orthodox Church
*{{ru icon}} Vadim Petrushko ''Autocephaleous schisms in Ukraine in 1989-1997.''
*{{uk icon}} ],
*{{uk icon}}


;Citations
*Articles in Ukrainian weekly newspaper ] (Mirror Weekly):
{{reflist|3}}
**{{en icon}}{{uk icon}}/{{ru icon}} , February 4-10, 2006
**{{uk icon}}/{{ru icon}} "Ukrainian Mission and its Messiahs", July 2005, and
**{{uk icon}}/{{ru icon}}"You can't prohibit dreaming. But can you force it?", April, 2005, and
**{{uk icon}}/{{ru icon}}"A church is hostage", February 2004 and
**{{uk icon}}/{{ru icon}}"A chessboard of religious affairs", April 2003 and


;Sources
== External links ==
*
*General:
* {{in lang|ru}}
** {{uk icon}} - official site
* {{in lang|ru}} ''Orthodox Encyclopedia'' Published by the Russian Orthodox Church
** {{en icon}}/{{uk icon}}/{{ru icon}} - a project of the Institute of Religion and Society of the
* {{in lang|ru}} Vadim Petrushko ''Autocephalous schisms in Ukraine in 1989-1997.''
* {{in lang|uk}} ],
* {{in lang|uk}}
* Articles in Ukrainian weekly newspaper ] (Mirror Weekly):
** {{in lang|en|uk|ru}} , February 4–10, 2006
** {{in lang|uk|ru}} "Ukrainian Mission and its Messiahs", July 2005, and
** {{in lang|uk|ru}} "You can't prohibit dreaming. But can you force it?", April, 2005, and
** {{in lang|uk|ru}} "A church is hostage", February 2004 and
** {{in lang|uk|ru}} "A chessboard of religious affairs", April 2003 and


{{refend}}
*Churches:
** {{uk icon}}/{{ru icon}}
** {{uk icon}}
** {{en icon}}/{{uk icon}}
** {{en icon}}/{{uk icon}}/{{ru icon}}
** {{en icon}}/{{ru icon}}
**
**


==Further reading==
{{Europe in topic|Christianity in}}
{{Main|Bibliography of Ukrainian history}}

== External links ==
{{History of Ukraine}}
* '''General'''
** {{in lang|en|uk|ru}} - a project of the Institute of Religion and Society of the {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220403005611/https://ucu.edu.ua/ |date=2022-04-03 }}
** {{in lang|uk}}
** at the ]
* '''Churches'''
** {{in lang|uk}}
** {{in lang|en|uk|ru}}
** {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220530150405/http://orthodox.org.ua/ |date=2022-05-30 }} {{in lang|uk|ru}}
** {{in lang|uk|en|es|fr|ru}}
** {{in lang|en|uk|ru}}
** {{in lang|en|uk}}
** {{in lang|en|uk}}
** {{in lang|en|fr}}
**


{{Christianity in Ukraine}}
<!--The current divided and fluid situation traces its roots to the close connection between Orthodox church and the state in ] after the transfer of the Kiev Metropolitan ] from the ] to the Patriarch of Moscow in ]. Some clerics and church historians, particularly in Ukraine, do not consider this transfer legitimate and claim it was implemented via the ecclesiastic crime of ] by the Russian Church, itself elevated to patriarchal status a hundred years prior to the transfer, but eventually accepted under pressure from the ] ]. This development, they claim, resulted in a forced policy of ] of Ukrainian Christianity. Gradually Russophile Orthodox clergy during the 18th and 19th centuries became dominant in Ukraine. Despite the fact that the transfer was and still is occasionally questioned in Ukraine, it gained a de-facto recognition and acceptance in the ] by 300+ years of Ukrainian Orthodoxy remaining in the see of the Patriarch of Moscow.
{{History of Christianity}}
{{Europe topic|History of Christianity in}}
{{Ukraine topics}}


{{commons category|History of Christianity in Ukraine}}
The UOC-MP, which operates in ] with the other Eastern Orthodox churches still owns the majority of Orthodox church buildings in Ukraine and is predominant in eastern and southern Ukraine. The UOC-KP has its communities scattered across Ukraine outnumbering those of the UOC-MP in western part of the country. The UGCC and the UAOC, on the other hand, have most of their communities in the western provinces (]s} of ], ] and ]. The UOC-KP and especially the UAOC and UGCC have strong support in the ].-->


] {{DEFAULTSORT:History Of Christianity In Ukraine}}
] ]
]

Latest revision as of 10:02, 31 August 2024

This article needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (December 2018)
Christianity by country
Africa
Asia
  • Armenia
  • Azerbaijan
  • Bahrain
  • Cyprus
  • Iran
  • Iraq
  • Israel
  • Jordan
  • Kuwait
  • Lebanon
  • Oman
  • Palestine
  • Qatar
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Syria
  • Turkey
  • United Arab Emirates
  • Yemen
  • Europe
    North America
    Oceania
    South America
    icon Christianity portal

    The history of Christianity in Ukraine dates back to the earliest centuries of the history of Christianity, to the Apostolic Age, with mission trips along the Black Sea and a legend of Andrew the Apostle even ascending the hills of Kiev. The first Christian community on territory of modern Ukraine is documented as early as the 4th century with the establishment of the Metropolitanate of Gothia, which was centered in the Crimean peninsula. However, on territory of the Old Rus in Kiev, Christianity became the dominant religion since its official acceptance in 989 by Vladimir the Great (Volodymyr the Great), who brought it from Byzantine Crimea and installed it as the state religion of medieval Kievan Rus (Ruthenia), with the metropolitan see in Kiev.

    Although separated into various Christian denominations, most Ukrainian Christians share a common faith based on Eastern Christianity. This tradition is represented in Ukraine by the Byzantine Rite, the Eastern Orthodox and Eastern Catholic churches, which have been at various historic times closely aligned with Ukrainian national self-identity and Byzantine culture.

    Being officially eliminated since the end of World War II, the recent revival of Ukrainian national religions started just before dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1989 with reestablishment of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church which also triggered recovery of the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church movement out of diaspora and transition of the former Russian Orthodox Church clergy who were native Ukrainians. Today, there are three national Ukrainian churches: the Orthodox Church of Ukraine, the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, and the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. Additionally, there is a smaller number of Byzantine rite adherents in the Ruthenian Greek Catholic Church who were dominated by the Kingdom of Hungary in the past. Western Christian bodies including the Latin Church of the Catholic Church and several Protestant denominations have had a limited presence on the territory of Ukraine since at least the 16th century and represent a minority of Christians in the country.

    Early history

    Andrew the Apostle

    St Andrew's prophecy of Kiev depicted by his raising a cross, in the Radziwiłł Chronicle.

    Andrew the apostle is believed to have travelled up the western shores of the Black Sea, to the area of present-day southern Ukraine, while preaching in the lands of Scythia. Legend (recorded in the Radziwiłł Chronicle) has it that he travelled further still, up the Dnieper River, until he came to the location of present-day Kiev in AD 55, where he erected a cross and prophesied the foundation of a great Christian city. Belief in the missionary visit of Andrew became widespread by the Middle Ages, and by 1621, a Kiev synod had declared him the "Rus'-apostle". Titus, a disciple of Andrew, is also venerated in Ukrainian churches, as are three "Scythian" disciples, Saints Ina, Pina and Rima, who accompanied him to Kiev. Both the 18th-century Church of St Andrew and an earlier structure from 1086 it replaced were purportedly built on the very location of the apostle's cross, planted on a hill overlooking the city of Kiev.

    Although the Primary Chronicle refers to the apostle continuing his journey as far north as Novgorod, Andrew's visit to any of these lands has not been proven, and in fact may have been a later invention designed to boost the autocephalic aspirations in the territories where the upper clergy continued to be dominated by Greeks for several centuries.

    These first half-legendary Christian churches on the territory of present Ukraine were eliminated by the Gothic invasion in the third century. The head of the "Scythian bishopric" presented at the First Ecumenical Council in Nicaea in 325 probably in fact was Bishop Cadmus from the Bosporan Kingdom.

    Crimean roots

    The ruins of Korsun (Chersonesos) Crimea, a place where East Slavic Christianity was born.
    An Eastern Orthodox Icon depicting Equal-to-apostles Cyril and Methodius brothers as the Christian saints.
    Further information: Metropolitanate of Gothia

    Pope Clement I (ruled 88–98) was exiled to Chersonesos on the Crimean peninsula in 102, as was Pope Martin I in 655. Furthermore, it has been definitively recorded that a representative from the Black Sea area, the "head of the Scythian bishopric", was present at the First Council of Nicaea in 325, as well as the First Council of Constantinople in 381; it has been surmised that this representative would have to have been Bishop Cadmus of the Bosporan Kingdom. Ostrogoths, who remained on present-day Ukrainian lands after the invasion of the Huns, established a metropolinate under the Bishop of Constantinople at Dorus in northern Crimea around the year 400. A bishop's seat had also existed since 868 across the Strait of Kerch, in the ancient city of Tmutarakan. The Polans and the Antes cultures, located so close to the Crimea, surely became familiarized with Christianity by this time.

    Cyril and Methodius

    The relics of Pope Martin were allegedly retrieved by the "Equal-to-apostles" brothers Cyril and Methodius, who passed through present-day Ukraine on their way to preach to the Khazars. Sent from Constantinople at the request of the ruler of Great Moravia, these brothers would add to foundation of Christianity in Ukraine by creating the Glagolitic alphabet, a precursor to the eponymous "Cyrillic script", which enabled the local population to worship God in Old Church Slavonic, a language closer to the vernacular Old East Slavic language than the Greek used to worship in Constantinople, or Latin in the west.

    In response to local disputes with clerics of the Latin Church, Cyril and Methodius appealed in person to the Bishop of Rome in 867, bringing with them the relics of Pope Martin from Chersonesos. Their labors and request were met with approval, and their continued efforts planted the Christian faith into Ukrainian Rus. By 906, they had founded a diocese in Peremyshl, today a diocese of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church in Przemyśl, Poland. Their efforts, and those of their apostles, led to the translation of Christian Scriptures and service (liturgies) from Greek to Slavonic, and the eventual development of the modern Cyrillic alphabet.

    Early Rus' period

    Main article: Christianization of Kievan Rus'
    The Baptism of Kievans, a fresco by Viktor Vasnetsov.
    Clandestine and secret Christian communities existed in the Pagan Rus' long before its final Christianization. First Christians in Kiev by Vasily Perov.

    By the 9th century, it is known that the Slavic population of western Ukraine (likely the White Croats) had accepted Christianity while under the rule of Great Moravia. However, it was the East Slavs who came to dominate most of the territory of present-day Ukraine, beginning with the rule of the Rus', whose pantheon of gods had held a considerable following for over 600 years.

    Following the 860 assault on Constantinople by Rus' forces under the command of Askold and Dir, the two princes were baptized in that holy city. Returning to Kiev, the two actively championed Christianity for a period of 20 years, until they were murdered by the pagan Prince Oleg in the inter-princely rivalry for the Kiev throne. Patriarch Photios purportedly provided a bishop and priests from Constantinople to help in the Christianization of the Slavs. By 900, a church was already established in Kiev, St. Elijah's, modeled on a church of the same name in Constantinople. This gradual acceptance of Christianity is most notable in the Rus'-Byzantine Treaty of 945, which was signed by both "baptized" and unbaptized Rus'", according to the text included in the Primary Chronicle.

    Establishment of the Kiev Metropolitan

    Christianity acceptance among the Rus' nobility gained a vital proponent when Princess Olga, the ruler of Kiev, became baptized, taking the "Christian name" Helen. Her baptism in 955 (or 957) in either Kiev or Constantinople (accounts differ) was a turning point in religious life of Rus' but it was left to her grandson, Vladimir the Great, to make Kievan Rus a Christian state. Both Vladimir and Olga are venerated as the Equal-to-apostles saints by the Eastern Orthodox Church.

    Princess Olga of Kiev shortly after her baptism appealed to the Holy Roman emperor Otto the Great to send missionaries into Kievan Rus. Adalbert, a Latin missionary bishop from Germany, was sent, but his missions and the priests who missionized along with him, were stopped. Most of the group of Latin missionaries were slain by pagan forces sent by Olga's son, Prince Svyatoslav, who had taken the Crown from his mother.

    Christianity became dominant in the territory with the mass Baptism of Kiev in the Dnieper River in 988 ordered by Vladimir. That year is considered as the year of establishment of the Kiev Metropolis and part of the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople. The exact date of establishment is not clearly known as the Kiev eparchy (metropolis) is mentioned as early as 891. The first cathedral temple, Church of the Tithes (Assumption of Virgin Mary), was built in 996.

    Following the Great Schism in 1054, the Kievan Rus that incorporated some of the modern Ukraine ended up on the Eastern Orthodox Byzantine side of the divided Christian world. Early on, the Orthodox Christian metropolitans had their seat in Pereyaslav, and later in Kiev. The people of Kiev lost their Metropolitan to Vladimir-Suzdal in 1299 (who retained the title), but gained a new Metropolitan in Halych in 1303. The religious affairs were also ruled in part by a Metropolitan in Navahrudak, (present-day Belarus).

    After the breakup of the Kievan Rus

    In the 15th century, the primacy over the Ruthenian Orthodox Church was moved to Vilnius, under the title "Metropolis of Kiev and all Rus'". One clause of the Union of Krevo stipulated that Jagiello would disseminate Catholicism among Orthodox subjects of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, of which Ukraine was a part. The opposition from the Ostrogskis and other Orthodox magnates led to this policy being suspended in the early 16th century.

    Following the Union of Lublin, the Polonization of the Ukrainian church was accelerated. Unlike the Catholic Church, the Orthodox church in Ukraine was liable to various taxes and legal obligations. The building of new Orthodox churches was strongly discouraged. The Catholics were strictly forbidden to convert to Orthodoxy, and the marriages between Catholics and Orthodox were frowned upon. Orthodox subjects had been increasingly barred from high offices of state.

    Union of Brest and its aftermath

    Christmas icon, Adoration of the Shepherds, from the Ivan Honchar Museum collection. Artist unknown, c. 1670.
    Main article: Union of Brest

    In order to oppose such restrictions and to reverse cultural polonization of Orthodox bishops, the Ecumenical Patriarch encouraged the activity of the Orthodox urban communities called the "brotherhoods" (bratstvo). In 1589 Hedeon Balaban, the bishop of Lviv, asked the Pope to take him under his protection, because he was exasperated by the struggle with urban communities and the Ecumenical Patriarch. He was followed by the bishops of Lutsk, Cholm, and Turov in 1590. In the following years, the bishops of Volodymyr-Volynskyy and Przemyśl and the Metropolitan of Kiev announced their secession from the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, which was increasingly influenced by the Ottomans. In 1595 some representatives of this group arrived to Rome and asked Pope Clement VIII to take them under his jurisdiction and unite them to the Apostolic See of Saint Peter.

    In the Union of Brest of 1596 (colloquially known as unia), a part of the Ukrainian Church was accepted under the jurisdiction of the Roman Pope, becoming a Byzantine Rite Catholic Church, a Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, colloquially known as the Uniate Church. While the new church gained many faithful among the Ukrainians in Galicia, the majority of Ukrainians in the rest of the lands remained within Eastern Orthodoxy with the church affairs ruled by then from Kiev under the metropolitan Petro Mohyla. The Orthodox Church was made illegal (its legality was partially restored in 1607), its property confiscated, and Orthodox believers faced persecution and discrimination which became an important reason for large numbers of Ukrainians to emigrate to Tsardom of Russia following the Union. The eastward spread of the Union of Brest led to violent clashes, for example, assassination of the Greek Catholic Archbishop Josaphat Kuntsevych by the Orthodox mob in Vitebsk in 1623.

    Khmelnytsky Uprising

    Main article: Khmelnytsky Uprising

    As the unia continued its expansion into Ukraine, its unpopularity grew, particularly in the southern steppes where Dnieper Cossacks lived. The Cossacks, who valued their traditions and culture, saw the unia as a final step of Polonization. As a result, they reacted by becoming fierce proponents of Orthodoxy. Such feelings played a role in the mass uprising whose targets included all non-Orthodox religious proponents, the Catholic and Uniate clergy and Jews. During this time metropolitan Mogila took full advantage of the moment to restore the Orthodox domination in Ukraine, including returning one of its sacred buildings, the Saint Sophia Cathedral in Kiev.

    Rule of the Empires

    Main article: Russian Orthodox Church

    Territories gained by Pereyaslav Rada

    In 1686, 40 years after Mogila's death, the Ottomans, acting on the behalf of the regent of Russia Sophia Alekseyevna, pressured the Patriarch of Constantinople into transferring the Orthodox Church of Kiev and all Rus' from the jurisdiction of Constantinople to the Patriarch of Moscow, established a century prior to that. The legality of this step is occasionally questioned to this day along with the fact that the transfer was accompanied by graft and bribery, which in church affairs amounts to an ecclesiastical crime. The transfer itself, however, led to the significant Ukrainian domination of the Russian Orthodox Church, which continued well into the 18th century, Feofan Prokopovich, Epifany Slavinetsky, Stephen Yavorsky and Demetrius of Rostov being among the most notable representatives of this trend.

    Territories gained from Crimean Khanate

    In the late 18th century, the Crimean Khanate (Vassal for Ottoman Empire) was conquered by Russia, and the latter annexed most of the southern steppes and Crimea. Colonization of these lands was actively encouraged by Orthodox people, particularly Ukrainians, Russians and Serbs. As New Russia (Novorossiya, as it was then known) was settled, new Orthodox parishes were created. Construction of cathedrals that demonstrate some of the finest examples of late-19th-century Russian Architecture was undertaken in large cities such as Odesa and Sevastopol.

    Territories gained from partitions

    In the late 17th century Poland became less and less influential and internal corruption as well as the pressure from its powerful neighbors resulted in its partitions by neighbouring empires. The Russian Empire, in particular, gained most of ethnically Ukrainian land and all of the Belarusian lands. After nearly two centuries of polonization, the Uniate influence on the Ukrainian population was so great that hardly any remained Orthodox. Although some, particularly in Podolia, chose to revert to Orthodoxy soon after, this in many cases was an exception rather than trend and in locations where the Unia already gave deep roots into the population all of the church property remained in the Catholic and Uniate authority. Also significant was Empress Catherine II's decree "On the newly acquired territory", according to which most of the Polish magnates retained all their lands and property (thus a significant control over population) in the newly acquired lands.

    Nevertheless, the first Russophile tendencies began to surface, and came in face of the Uniate Bishop Joseph Semashko. Believing that the Uniate Church's role as an interim bridge between Orthodoxy and their eventual path to Catholicism is over, now that the ruler of the lands is no longer a Catholic, but an Orthodox Monarch, he began to push for an eventual reversion of all Uniates. Although the idea was shared by growing number of the lower priests, the ruling Uniate synod, controlled by the strong Polish influence, rejected all Semashko's suggestions. In addition many of the Latin Church Catholic authorities responded to this by actively imposing Latin practice and hierarchy.

    In 1831, the general discontent of the Poles with the Russian rule erupted into a revolt, now known as the November Uprising, which the Uniate Church officially supported. However, the uprising failed, and the Russian authorities were quick to respond to its organisers and areas of strongest support. The outcome was that the Uniate synod's members were removed along with most of the Polish magnates privileges' and authority being taken away. With the Polish influence in the Ruthenian lands significantly reduced and in some cases eliminated, the Uniate Church began to disintegrate. In Volhynia the famous Pochayiv Lavra was returned to Russian Orthodox clergy in 1833. The final blow came from the Synod of Polotsk in 1839 headed by the ex-Uniate Bishop Semashko, where it was agreed to terminate the accords of Union of Brest and all of the remaining Uniate property on the territory of the Belarus and Right Bank Ukraine within the Russian Empire was incorporated into the Russian Orthodox Church. Those Uniate clergy who refused to join the Russian Orthodox Church (593 out of a total of 1,898 in Ukraine and Belarus) were exiled to the Russian interior or Siberia. By means of mass deportations, persecution and even executions the Uniates were practically eliminated in the Russian Empire. Only a small number of Greek Catholics in the Kholm Governorate managed to preserve their faith.

    Within the Russian Empire, the Uniate Church continued to function until 1875, when the Eparchy of Chelm was abolished.The greater longevity of the Uniate Church in this region was attributed to the fact that it came under Russian control later than did the other territories (1809) and that, unlike other Ukrainian regions within the Russian Empire, it had been part of the Congress Poland, which had some autonomy until 1865. Within Chelm, the conversion to Orthodoxy met with strong resistance from the local ethnic Ukrainian priests and parishioners, and was accomplished largely through the efforts of Russian police, Cossacks, and immigrating Russophile priests from eastern Galicia. The resistance was strong enough that when, a generation later in 1905, the formally Eastern Orthodox population of Chelm was allowed to return to Catholicism (Russian authorities only allowing conversion to the Latin Church), 170,000 out of 450,000 did so by 1908.

    Pochayiv Lavra, located right next to the border of the Russian Empire and Austria-Hungary after its return to Orthodoxy in 1833 became a major bastion against the Catholic-ruled Galicia.

    Austrian Galicia and World War I

    Further information: Western Ukrainian Clergy

    Although the Partitions of Poland awarded most of the Ruthenian lands to the Russian Empire, this excluded the southwestern Kingdom Of Galicia (constituting the modern Lviv, Ivano-Frankivsk and parts of Ternopil oblasts), which fell under the control of the Habsburg monarchy and subsequently the Austrian Empire and the Austria-Hungary. Similarly to the situation in the lands of the Russian Empire, the Uniate Ruthenian (Ukrainian) peasantry was largely under the Polish Latin Catholic domination. The Austrians granted equal legal privileges to the Uniate Church and removed Polish influence. They also mandated that Uniate seminarians receive a formal higher education (previously, priests had been educated informally by other priests, usually their fathers, as the vocation was passed on within families), and organized institutions in Vienna and Lviv that would serve this function. This led to the appearance, for the first time, of a large educated social class within the Ukrainian population in Galicia. As a result, within Austrian Galicia over the next century the Uniate Church ceased being a puppet of foreign interests and became the primary cultural force within the Ukrainian community. Most independent native Ukrainian cultural trends (such as Rusynophilia, Russophilia and later Ukrainophilia) emerged from within the ranks of the Uniate Church. The participation of Uniate priests or their children in western Ukrainian cultural and political life was so great that western Ukrainians were accused of wanting to create a theocracy in western Ukraine by their Polish rivals.

    During the 19th century there was a struggle within the Uniate Church (and therefore within the general Galician society due to its domination by priests) between Russophiles who desired union with Russia and Ukrainophiles who saw the Galician Ruthenians as Ukrainians, not Russians. The former group were mostly represented by older and more conservative elements of the priesthood, while the latter ideology was more popular among the younger priests. The Russophilia of the Galician Ruthenians was particularly strong during the mid-19th century, although by the end of that century the Russophiles had declined in importance relative to the Ukrainophiles. The Austrian authorities during this time began to be more and more involved in the power-struggle with Russia for the rule of the Balkans, as the declining Ottoman Empire withdrew, and in so doing opposed the Russophiles. The Balkans themselves were largely Orthodox and crucial to the Russian Panslavism movement. In this situation, the Galician Ruthenians found themselves in the pawn's position.

    When the power struggle erupted into the First World War, the Russian Army initially quickly overran Galicia (see Eastern Front (World War I)). Free of Polish domination, unlike in other areas of Ukraine the Uniate church had become closely linked to the Ukrainian people and the Ukrainian national movement. For this reason, the population in general were quite loyal to the Austrian Habsburgs, earning the nickname "Tyroleans of the East", and resisted reunion into the Orthodox Church. A minority of them, however, welcomed the Russians and reverted to Orthodoxy. After regaining the lost territories with the counterattack in late 1914, the Austrian authorities responded with repressions: several thousand Orthodox and Russophilic people died while being interred at a Talerhof concentration camp for those deemed disloyal to Austria. Already a minority, the Russophiles were largely extinguished as a religious-cultural force in Galicia as a result of these actions.

    Twentieth and twenty-first centuries

    Soviet Union

    After the Russian Revolution and the Russian Civil War the Bolsheviks seized power in the Russian Empire and transformed it into the Soviet Union. Religion in the new socialist society was assigned little value by the state, but in particular Russian Orthodox Church was distrusted because of its active support of the White Movement. Massive arrests and repressions began immediately. In the Ukrainian SSR (one of the founding republics of the USSR) as early as in December 1918 the first execution of the head of the Ukrainian Exarchate Metropolitan of Kiev and Halych took place. This was only the start which culminated in mass closing and destruction of churches (some standing since the days of the Kievan Rus) and executions of clergy and followers.

    Ukraine was controlled by several short-lived yet independent governments which revived the Ukrainian national idea. Ukraine declared its political independence following the fall of the Provisional Government in 1918 and the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church was established.

    Following the Soviet regime's taking root in Ukraine and despite the ongoing Soviet-wide antireligious campaign, the Bolshevik authorities saw the national churches as a tool in their goal to suppress the Russian Orthodox Church always viewed with the great suspicion by the regime for its being the cornerstone of pre-revolutionary Russian Empire and the initially strong opposition the church took towards the regime change (the position of the patriarch Tikhon of Moscow was especially critical).

    On November 11, 1921 , an unrecognised Church Council started in Kiev. The council would proclaim the first formation of the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church (UAOC). The Russian Orthodox Church strongly opposed the formation of the Ukrainian autocephaly and not a single ordained bishop was willing or able to ordain the hierarchy for a new church. Therefore, the clergy "ordained" its own hierarchy itself, a practice questionable under the canon law, in the "Alexandrian" manner - by laying on priests' hands on two senior candidates who became known as Metropolitan Vasyl (Lypkivsky) and Archbishop Nestor (Sharayivsky) (reportedly the relics of Clement of Rome who died in Ukraine in the 1st century were also used). Despite the canon law controversy, the new church was recognized in 1924 by the Ecumenical Patriarch Gregory VII.

    In the wake of the Ukrainization policies carried out in Soviet Ukraine in the first decade of the Soviet rule many of the Orthodox clergy willfully joined the church thus avoiding the persecution suffered by many clergy members who remained inside the Russian Orthodox Church. During the period in which the Soviet government tolerated the renewed Ukrainian national church the UAOC gained a wide following particularly among the Ukrainian peasantry.

    Ruins of the St. Michael's Golden-Domed Monastery after its destruction in 1936

    In the early-1930s the Soviet government abruptly reversed the policies in the national republics and mass arrests of UAOC's hierarchy and clergy culminated in the liquidation of the church in 1930. Most of the surviving property was officially transferred to the ROC, with some churches closed for good and destroyed. On the eve of the Second World War only 3% of the pre-revolutionary parishes on the territory of Ukraine remained open to the public, often hidden in deep rural areas.

    Second Polish Republic

    The 1921 Peace of Riga treaty that ended the Polish-Soviet War gave the significant areas of the ethnically Ukrainian (and Belarusian) territories to the reborn Polish state. This included Polesie and Volhynia, areas with almost exclusively Orthodox population amongst the rural peasants, as well as the former Austrian province of Galicia with its Uniate population.

    The Greek Catholic church, which functions in communion with the Latin Catholicism, could have hoped to receive a better treatment in Poland, whose leadership, especially the endecja party, saw the Catholicism as one of the main tools to unify the nation where non-Polish minority comprised over one third of the citizenry. Nevertheless, the Poles saw the Greek Catholic Galicia Ukrainians as even less reliable and loyal as the Orthodox Volhynia Ukrainians. Also, despite the communion with Rome, the UGCC attained a strong Ukrainian national character of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, and the Polish authorities sought to weaken it in various ways. In 1924, following a visit with the Ukrainian Catholic believers in North America and western Europe, the head of the UGCC was initially denied reentry to Lviv until after a considerable delay. Polish priests led by their bishops began to undertake missionary work among Eastern Catholic faithful, and the administrative restrictions were placed on the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church.

    With respect to the Orthodox Ukrainian population in eastern Poland, the Polish government initially issued a decree defending the rights of the Orthodox minorities. In practice, this often failed, as the Catholics, also eager to strengthen their position, had stronger representation in the Sejm and the courts. During the Polish rule, 190 Orthodox churches were destroyed (although some of them have already been abandoned) and 150 were forcibly transformed into Catholic (not Ukrainian Catholic) churches. Such actions were condemned by the head of the Ukrainian Catholic Church, metropolitan Andrei Sheptytsky, who claimed that these acts would "destroy in the souls of our non-united Orthodox brothers the very thought of any possibility of reunion."

    In addition to persecution from the new authorities, the Orthodox clergy found itself with no ecclesiastical link to submit to. Like most ex-Russian Orthodox communities that ended up outside the USSR, and thus with no possible contact with the persecuted mother church, the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople agreed to take over Moscow Patriarchate's role and in 1923 the Polish Orthodox Church was formed out of the parishes that were on the territory of the Polish republic although 90% of its clergy and believers were non-Polish people.

    Czechoslovakia

    The redrawal of national boundaries following World War I also affected yet another ethnically Ruthenian territory. In 1920, the country of Czechoslovakia was formed, the nation included several minorities. In the easternmost end of the country, Transcarpathia lived the Rusyn population. For most of their history they were ruled by the Hungarians, who unlike the Austrians ruling Galicia were quite active in opposing Ukrainophile sentiments. Instead, the Hungarians supported a Rusyn identity (separate from either a pro-Ukrainian or pro-Russian orientation) through pro-Hungarian priests in an effort to separate the Ruthenian people under their rule from their brethren across the mountains. Thus despite being Uniate at the time of the formation of Czechoslovakia, the population was about evenly divided between Rusynophile, Ukrainophile and Russophile orientation. The general Russophilic sentiment was very strong amongst them, and these cultural and political orientations impacted the local religious communities. Even before the first world war already quite a lot of distant mountain communities were de facto Orthodox, where priests simply ceased to follow the Uniate canons. However, much more significant changes took place in the interwar period.

    In the 1920s many Russian emigres, particularly Orthodox clergy, settled in Serbia. Loyal to the Orthodox state, they became actively involved in missionary work in central Europe. A group, headed by Bishop Dosifei went to Transcarpathia. Because of the historical links between the local Greek Catholic clergy to the disliked Hungarian authorities, mass conversions to the Orthodox Church occurred. By the start of the Second World War, approximately one third of all of the Rusyn population reverted to Orthodoxy . The region's local Hungarian population, estimated at slightly less than 20% of the population, remained overwhelmingly Calvinist or Catholic. (For the Ruthenian population left outside Ukraine in 1945 (today Prešov territory in Slovakia) see Czech and Slovak Orthodox Church).

    Second World War

    On September 17, 1939, with Poland crumbling under the German attack that started the Second World War, the Red Army attacked Poland, assigning territories with an ethnic Ukrainian majority to Soviet Ukraine. Because the Ukrainians were by-and-large discontented with Polish rule most of the Orthodox clergy actually welcomed the Soviet troops.

    The addition of the ethnic Ukrainian territory of Volhynia to the USSR created several issues. Having avoided the Bolshevik repression, the Orthodox church of this rural region outnumbered the rest of the Ukrainian SSR by nearly a thousand churches and clergy as well as many cloisters including the Pochayiv Lavra. The ecclesiastical link with the Moscow Patriarchate was immediately restored. Within months nearly a million Orthodox pilgrims, from all over the country, fearing that these reclaimed western parishes would share the fate of others in the USSR, took the chance to visit them. However, the Soviet authorities, although confiscating some of the public property, did not show the repressions of the post-revolutionary period that many expected and no executions or physical destruction took place.

    On October 8, 1942, Archbishop Nikanor and Bishop Mstyslav (later a Patriarch) of the UAOC and Metropolitan Oleksiy (Hromadsky) of the Ukrainian Autonomous Orthodox Church concluded an Act of Union, uniting the two national churches at the Pochayiv Lavra. Later German occupation authorities and pro-Russian hierarchs of the Autonomous Church convinced Metropolitan Oleksiy to remove his signature. Metropolitan Oleksiy was murdered in Volhynia on May 7, 1943, by the nationalists of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army which saw this as treason.

    Post-war situations

    Praying child by Jacques Hnizdovsky

    The Russian Orthodox Church regained its general monopoly in the Ukrainian SSR after World War II following another shift in the official Soviet attitude towards Christian churches. As a result, many started to accuse it of being a puppet of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. After the suspicious death of Patriarch Tikhon, the UAOC and UGCC sought to avoid the transfer under the Moscow Patriarchate; something that Moscow tolerated until after World War II, for example the head of the Ukrainian Communist Party, Nikita Khrushchev attended the funeral of the head of the Uniate Church in 1946. Nevertheless, as the Uniate Church did in some cases support the Nazi regime, the overall Soviet attitude was negative. In 1948 a small group of priests started to proclaim a reunion with Orthodoxy. The Soviet state organized in 1948 a synod in Lviv, where the 1596 Union of Brest was annulled, thereby breaking the canonical ties with Rome and transferring under the Moscow Patriarchate. In Transcarpathia, the reigning Greek Catholic bishop, Theodore Romzha, was murdered and the remaining priests were forced to return their Church to Orthodoxy. This move's acceptance was mixed. With many clergy members and lay believers turning to the ROC, some adamantly refused. As a result of this the Patriarchate of Moscow could now legally lay claim to any Orthodox church property that was within the territory of its uncontested jurisdiction, which it did. Some believers refused to accept liquidation of their churches and for nearly 40 years the UAOC and UGCC existed in Western Ukraine underground led by the clergy members under the threat of prosecution by the Soviet state. Much of the UGCC and UAOC clergy not willing to serve in the ROC emigrated to Germany, the United States, or Canada. Others were sent to Siberia and even chose to be martyred. Officially the Moscow Patriarchate never recognised the canonical right of the synod as it lacked any bishops there.

    The relatively permissive post-war government attitude towards the Orthodox Church came to an end with Khrushchev's "Thaw" programme, which included closing the recently opened Kiev's Caves Lavra. However, in the west-Ukrainian dioceses, which were the largest in the USSR, the Soviet attitude was "softest". In fact in the western city of Lviv, only one church was closed. The Moscow Patriarchate also relaxed its canons on the clergy, especially those from the former-uniate territories, allowing them, for example to shave beards (a very uncommon Orthodox practice) and conduct eulogy in Ukrainian instead of Church Slavonic.

    Late Soviet period

    In 1988 with the millennium anniversary of the baptism of Rus, there was yet another shift in the Soviet attitude towards religion, coinciding with the Perestroika and Glasnost programmes. The Soviet Government publicly apologized for oppression of religion and promised to return all property to the rightful owners. As a result, thousands of closed religious buildings in all areas of the USSR were returned to their original owners. In Ukraine this was the then ROC's Ukrainian Exarchate, which took place in the central, eastern and southern Ukraine. In the former-uniate areas of western Ukraine things were more turbulent. As UGCC survived in diaspora and in the underground they took their chance and were immediately revived in Ukraine, where in the wake of general liberalization of the Soviet policies in the late-1980s the activization of Ukrainian national political movements was also prompted. The Russian Orthodox Church became viewed by some as an attribute of Soviet domination, and bitter, often violent clashes over church buildings followed with the ROC slowly losing its parishes to the UGCC.

    The UAOC also followed suit. Sometimes possessors of Church buildings changed several times within days. Although the Soviet law-enforcement did attempt to pacify the almost-warring parties, these were often unsuccessful, as many of the local branches in the ever-crumbling Soviet authority sympathised with the national sentiments in their areas. Violence grew especially after the UGCC's demand that all property that was held prior to 1939 would be returned.

    It is now believed that the only real event which helped to contain the growing schism in the former-uniate territories was the ROC's reaction of raising its Ukrainian Exarchate to the status of an autonomous church, which took place in 1990, and up until the break up of the USSR in late 1991 there was an uneasy peace in western Ukraine. After the nation became independent, the question of an independent and an autocephalous Orthodox Church arose once again.

    Post-Soviet period

    In November 1991, Filaret, the Metropolitan of Kyiv, asked the hierarchy of the Russian Orthodox Church to grant the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) autocephalous status. The skeptical hierarchy of the Russian Orthodox Church called for a full Synodical council (Sobor) where this issue would have been discussed at length. Filaret, using his support from the old friendship-ties with the then newly elected President of Ukraine (Leonid Kravchuk), convinced Kravchuk that a new independent government should have its own independent church.

    In January 1992 Filaret convened an assembly at the Kiev Pechersk Lavra that adopted a request of autocephaly for Ukrainians, addressed to the Moscow Patriarch.

    St Volodymyr's Cathedral in Kyiv, built between 1862 and 1882 in honour of the 900th anniversary of the Baptism of Kiev as a jewel of Neo-Byzantine architecture in the Russian Empire, became a battleground between opposing church bodies and their political supporters.

    Upon returning to Kyiv from a Russian Orthodox Church synod meeting, Filaret carried out his reserve option: he revealed that his resignation from the position of Primate of the UOC had taken place under pressure and that he would not resign. The Ukrainian President Leonid Kravchuk gave Filaret his support, as did the Ukrainian nationalist paramilitaries, in retaining his rank. In a crisis moment the Hierarchical Council of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church agreed to another synod which met in May 1992. The council convened in the eastern city of Kharkiv, where the majority of the bishops voted to suspend Filaret from his clerical functioning. Simultaneously they elected a new leader, Metropolitan Volodymyr (Viktor Sabodan), native of the Khmelnytskyi Oblast and a former Patriarchal Exarch to Western Europe.

    With only three bishops giving him support, Filaret initiated unification with the UAOC, and in June 1992 established a new Ukrainian Orthodox Church - Kyiv Patriarchate (UOC-KP) with 94-year-old Patriarch Mstyslav of the UAOC as a leader. While chosen as Mstyslav's assistant, Filaret de facto ruled the new Church. A few of the Autocephalous bishops and clergy who opposed such situation refused to join the new church, even after the death of Mstyslav in June 1993. The church was once again ripped apart by a schism and most of the UAOC parishes were regained when the churches re-separated in July 1993.

    Most of the fate of control of church buildings was decided by the church parishes, but as most refused to follow Filaret, paramilitaries, especially in Volyn and Rivne Oblasts where there was strong nationalist sympathy amongst the new regional authorities, carried out raids bringing property under their control. The lack of parishes in eastern and southern Ukraine prompted President Kravchuk to intervene and to force buildings still closed from the Communist era to re-open under the UOC-KP's ownership. Upon the 1994 election of Leonid Kuchma as President of Ukraine, most of the violence was promptly stopped, and the presidency adopted a de facto neutrality attitude to all the four major church groups.

    Modern times

    The recent events of the 2004 Ukrainian presidential election and the Orange Revolution affected the religious affairs in the nation as well. Members of the UOC (MP) actively supported the former Prime minister Viktor Yanukovych while members of the UOC-KP, UAOC, and UGCC supported the opposition candidate Viktor Yushchenko, who was running against him. After Yushchenko's victory, the UOC (MP) criticised him for what they see as support of the "uncanonical organisations", such as his celebrating Orthodox Christmas in St Volodymyr's Cathedral (owned by UOC-KP). Yushchenko himself has publicly pledged to distance himself from Orthodox politics during his presidential campaign. Nonetheless, he claims that his intention is to achieve a unity of the nation's Eastern Orthodox Church affairs. Questions still arise on what will be the ecclesiastical status of the Church and who will head it, and as of February 2007 no public dialogue has begun.

    To date the issue between rivalries of different churches remains politicised and sensitive and also controversial. In a 2007 survey 33.3% felt satisfied with the current condition of several Orthodox Churches. At the same time up to 42.1% felt it would be important for a single united church, with 30.7% favoring the UOC-KP and 11.4% the UOC (MP). On the question of who shall head the church the political polarisation of the country surfaced - 56.1% of voters of Our Ukraine and 40.7% of voters from the Bloc Yulia Tymoshenko endorsed wanting one Orthodox Church under the Kyiv Patriarchate.

    On 15 December 2018, members of the existing Ukrainian Orthodox churches (the UOC-KP, the UAOC and two bishops who had left the UOC) voted through their representatives (bishops) to unite into the Orthodox Church of Ukraine on the basis of complete canonical independence. They elected their primate and adopted a charter for the Orthodox Church of Ukraine.

    Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew (left) handing the tomos of autocephaly to Metropolitan Epiphanius (right)

    Metropolitan Epiphanius of the UOC-KP, who had been chosen on 13 December by the UOC-KP as its only candidate, and was considered as Filaret's right arm and protégé, was elected Metropolitan of Kyiv and all Ukraine by the unification council on 15 December 2018 after the second round of voting.

    On 1 January 2019, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew confirmed his intention to grant the tomos of autocephaly to Metropolitan Epiphany on 6 January 2019, the day of Christmas Eve according to the old Julian calendar.

    On 5 January 2019, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew and Metropolitan Epiphanius celebrated a Divine Liturgy in St. George's Cathedral in Istanbul; the tomos was signed thereafter, also in St. George's Cathedral.

    The tomos "has come into force from the moment of its signing". The signing of the tomos officially established the autocephalous Orthodox Church of Ukraine. President Poroshenko traveled to Istanbul to attend the signing ceremony.

    After the tomos was signed, Ecumenical Patriarch Batholomew made an address to Metropolitan Epiphanius. President Poroshenko and Metropolitan Epiphanius also made speeches. On 6 January, after a Liturgy celebrated by Metropolitan Epiphanius and Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew read the tomos of the OCU and then gave it to Metropolitan Epiphanius. President Poroshenko was present during the signing and handing over of the tomos.

    On 9 January 2019, the tomos was brought back to Istanbul so that all the members of the Holy Synod of the Ecumenical Patriarchate could sign the tomos. The tomos has now been fully ratified, and will be returned again to Kyiv where it will remain permanently. The representative of the press service of the OCU, priest Ivan Sydor, said the tomos was valid after the signature of the Ecumenical Patriarch, "but according to the procedure, there must also be the signatures of those bishops who take part in the synod of the Constantinople Patriarchate." Former press secretary of the UOC-KP, Eustratius (Zorya), declared the Ecumenical Patriarch recognized the OCU by signing the tomos of autocephaly and by concelebrating the liturgy with Epiphanius while considering Epiphanius as primate of the OCU. The Ecumenical Patriarchate declared on 8 January 2018 that the tomos was "approved and valid" and that the signing by the whole synod was a "purely technical step". It added that Ukraine had asked for the tomos to be brought to Ukraine for Christmas instead of leaving it in Istanbul for a few days until the whole synod signed it.

    Main religious groups

    The main religious groups are presented below:

    Eastern Orthodox

    Orthodox Church of Ukraine

    St. Michael's Golden-Domed Monastery is used by the OCU as its Mother Church.
    Main article: Orthodox Church of Ukraine

    Abbreviated as the OCU, the church was established by a unification council on 15 December 2018, and received its tomos of autocephaly (decree of ecclesial independence) by Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople on 5 January 2019. The council voted to unite the existing Ukrainian Orthodox jurisdictions: the Ukrainian Orthodox Church – Kyiv Patriarchate (UOC-KP), the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church (UAOC) and two bishops of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC).

    The primate of the church is the Metropolitan of Kyiv and all Ukraine. The unification council elected Epiphanius Dumenko as its primate, previously the Metropolitan of Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi and Bila Tserkva (UOC-KP) in 2018.

    Orthodox Ukrainians of the diaspora are subject to the jurisdiction of the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople.

    Ukrainian Orthodox Church

    Main article: Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate)
    The Kyiv Pechersk Lavra of the UOC

    The Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC), operates as an autonomous church that was formerly part of the Moscow Patriarchate until declaring its full independence in 2022. The head of the church is Metropolitan Onufriy who was enthroned in August 2014 as the "Metropolitan of Kyiv and all Ukraine". The UOC claims to be the largest religious body in Ukraine with the greatest number of parish churches and communities counting up to half of the total in Ukraine and totaling over 10 thousand. As of 2007, the UOC also claimed to have up to 75% of the Ukrainian population. Independent survey results, however, show significant variance, as many Orthodox Ukrainians do not clearly self-identify with a particular jurisdiction and, sometimes, are even unaware of the affiliation of the church they attend or the existence of the controversy itself. This makes it difficult to use survey numbers as an indicator of the relative strength of any given Church. Also, the geographical factor plays a major role in the number of adherents, as the Ukrainian population tends to be more churchgoing in the western part of the country rather than in the UOC's heartland in southern and eastern Ukraine.

    Statistics on the number of parishes may be more reliable and consistent, even though they may not necessarily directly translate into the numbers of adherents. By number of parishes and quantity of church buildings, the UOC's strong base is central and north-western Ukraine. However, percentage wise (with respect to rival Orthodox Churches) its share of parishes there varies from 60 to 70 percent. At the same time, by percentage alone (with respect to rival Orthodox Churches) the UOC's share of church buildings peaks in the urban russophone southern and eastern Ukrainian provinces, being as high as 90%. The same can be said about Transcarpathia, although there the UOC's main rival is the Greek Catholic Church and thus its share of total church buildings is only 40%. The capital Kyiv is where the greatest Orthodox rivalry takes place, with the UOC holding about half of the Orthodox communities there. The only places where the UOC is a true minority, in both quantity, percentage and support are the former Galician provinces of Western Ukraine. There the total share of parishes does not exceed more than five percent.

    On 27 May 2022, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) formally cut ties and declared independence from the Russian Orthodox Church. Upon declaring its independence from the Moscow Patriarchate, the UOC began creating new parishes in Western Europe to serve Ukrainian refugees. By the end of 2022, 32 such parishes had been organized, and Bishop Veniamin (Voloshchuk) of Boyar was appointed to oversee the new diaspora parishes. One UOC parish exists in North America and predates the war: Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary, in Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada.

    Old Believers

    Traditionally the Ukrainian clergy, following the annexation of Kyivan Metropolia, were one of the main sources of opposition to the Old Believer schism which took place at the time, under Patriarch Nikon. None of the Ukrainian parishes followed the Russian Orthodox Old-Rite Church. Although in 1905 the Tsar's decree on freedom of religion allowed the Old Believers church to reform, it gained little support in Ukraine. Presently, however the Old Believer community very much exploited the politicised schism in Ukrainian Orthodoxy and, as of 2004, number 53 communities scattered throughout Ukraine, with one of the biggest in Vylkove.

    Catholic Church

    Main article: Catholic Church in Ukraine

    Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church

    Although the St. George's Cathedral in Lviv is no longer the mother church of the UGCC, the Church's parish continues to be centered in Western Ukraine.
    Main article: Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church

    Abbreviated as the UGCC, and originally formed from the Union of Brest in 1596, the Church was outlawed by the Soviet government in 1948 but continued to exist in the Ukrainian underground and in the Western Ukrainian diaspora. It was officially re-established in Ukraine in 1989. In 1991, Cardinal Lubachivsky returned to Lviv from emigration. Since 2011 UGCC has been headed by Major Archbishop Sviatoslav Shevchuk.

    Currently the Ukrainian Greek Catholic church has 3317 parishes which makes it the third largest denomination in Ukraine. Geographically, the Church's parishes were previously confined to the Western provinces of Lviv, Ternopil and Ivano-Frankivsk, where it has the most parishes of any Church and where its share of parishes ranges from 47% to 64%. The UGCC is also found in the neighboring Lemko areas in Poland. Numerous surveys conducted since the late 1990s consistently show that between 6% and 8% of Ukraine's population, or 9.4% to 12.6% of religious believers, identify themselves as belonging to this Church. In addition, the church has mass parishes abroad in the North American continent, South America, and Australia.

    In recent times parishes have been established in many Eastern Ukrainian cities such as Kharkiv, Donetsk, in the south in Odesa and Yalta and also in Russia. with parishes being set up in Moscow, Novosibirsk, Ufa, Cheliabinsk, Tomsk, and other cities. These parishes have been formed primarily by resettled Ukrainians from Western Ukraine.

    One of the largest religious controversies in Ukraine recently involved having the almost exclusively western Ukraine-based UGCC move its administrative centre from Lviv to Kyiv whilst its new cathedral's construction was sponsored by the first lady, Kateryna Yushchenko-Chumachenko. This move was criticised not only by the UOC(MP), but also by the whole Eastern Orthodox Communion.

    Latin Church

    Main article: Latin Church in Ukraine
    St. Nicholas Cathedral in Kyiv

    The Latin Church in Ukraine is predominantly populated by non-Ukrainian minorities, in particular Poles and Hungarians. Originally holding a large number of parishes, most of the churches remained empty after World War II, which is attributed to the fact that much of the Polish population (once a significant minority, especially in the west of modern-day Ukraine) was killed in the war and the interethnic violence that occurred during the war as well as being subject to forcible evacuations and deportations.

    After the restoration of Soviet power in Western Ukraine since 1944, many Catholic churches and monasteries were compulsorily closed and clergy persecuted.

    In 1991, Pope John Paul II officially restored the activities of Catholic Dioceses in Ukraine and appointed bishops. Currently the Catholic Church in Ukraine has 807 parishes in 713 churches.

    Ruthenian Greek Catholic Church

    Main article: Ruthenian Greek Catholic Church

    Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the Byzantine rite Catholic church in Transcarpathia emerged from the underground and was restored as a separate entity from the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church based in Galicia, namely the Ruthenian Catholic Church. This was done despite the protests by a portion of the Church members led by the bishop of Khust who demanded to be integrated into the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church. Despite this revival, unlike its sister Church in Galicia, the Ruthenian Byzantine rite Catholic Church has not regained its pre-war position as the dominant Church in Transcarpathia. It currently has about 23% of Transcarpathia's parishes, slightly less than 60% of the Orthodox total there. Its traditional base is the Rusyn (Ruthenian) ethnic minority in Transcarpathia.

    Protestantism

    Main article: Protestants in Ukraine
    This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (July 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

    In the 16th century small groups of Anabaptists appeared in Volodymyr-Volynskyi, but the influence of the Reformation in Ukraine remained marginal until three centuries later.

    Protestantism arrived to Ukraine together with German immigrants in the 18th and 19th centuries. They were initially granted religious freedom by the Russian Imperial authorities, unlike the native population. While some were Catholic, the majority were either Evangelical (in North America known as Lutheran) or Mennonite (Anabaptist). Of the 200,000 or so Germans in Volhynia c.1900, some 90% or so were Lutheran. Lutheranism went into a major decline with the emigration of most of the Germans out of the region during the World Wars but there are still small remnants today (2006) in the Odesa and Kyiv regions.

    One of earliest Protestant groups in Ukraine were Stundists (the name originated from the German Stunde, "hour") German Evangelical sect that spread from German villages in Bessarabia and Ekaterinoslav province to the neighbouring Ukrainian population. Protestantism in Ukraine rapidly grew during the liberal reforms of Alexander II in the 1860s. However, towards the end of the century authorities started to restrict Protestant proselytism of the Orthodox Christians, especially by the Stundists, routinely preventing prayer meetings and other activities. At the same time Baptists, another major Protestant group that was growing in Ukraine, were treated less harshly due to their powerful international connections.

    In the early 20th century, Volyn became the main centre of the spread of Protestantism in Ukraine. During the Soviet period Protestantism, together with Orthodox Christianity, was persecuted in Ukraine, but the 1980s marked the start of another major expansion of Protestant proselytism in Ukraine.

    Today the largest Protestant groups in Ukraine include Baptists (All-Ukrainian Union of the Association of Evangelical Baptists), Pentecostals (All-Ukrainian Union of Christians of the Evangelical Faith-Pentecostals), Seventh-day Adventists (Ukrainian Union Conference of Seventh-day Adventists) and a growing number of charismatic churches. Of note is the Hillsong Church in Kyiv. One of the most prominent Protestants in modern Ukraine is a practising Baptist pastor Oleksandr Turchynov, former head of the SBU, Ukraine's successor to the KGB. Despite recent rapid growth, Protestants in Ukraine still remain a small minority in a largely Orthodox Christian country.

    See also

    Portals:

    References

    Citations
    1. ^ Wilson, Andrew (2000). The Ukrainians: Unexpected Nation, Yale University Press, ISBN 0-300-09309-8; pages 33-37.
    2. "List of All Kievan Saints" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on August 31, 2006. Retrieved 2013-09-28. at the Byzantine Catholic Church in America
    3. (in Ukrainian) Panas, Kost' (1992). History of the Ukrainian Church (Історія української церкви), Transintekh; p. 12.
    4. Chirovsky, Nicholas (1981). Ancient and Kievan-Galician Ukraine-Rus, Philosophical Library; page 216.
    5. (in Russian) Mykola Kostomarov, "Russian History in Biographies of its main figures", Chapter Knyaz Kostantin Konstantinovich Ostrozhsky" (Konstanty Wasyl Ostrogski)
    6. Magocsi, R.P. (1996). A History of Ukraine. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. ISBN 0-8020-7820-6 Pg. 169 and 211.
    7. "As a result, the Kievans practically controlled the Russian church obtaining key posts there (and holding them to almost the end of the 18th century)"
      Yuri Kagramanov, "The war of languages in Ukraine Archived 2007-10-01 at the Wayback Machine", Novy Mir, 2006, № 8.
    8. "Воссоединение униатов и исторические судьбы белорусского народа". Pravoslavie.ru. Retrieved 2019-01-16.
    9. Magocsi, R.P. (1996). A History of Ukraine. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. ISBN 0-8020-7820-6 Pg. 375.
    10. ^ Subtelny, O. (1988). Ukraine: A History. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    11. Himka, John Paul. (1999). Religion and Nationality in Western Ukraine. McGill-Queen's University Press: Montreal and Kingston. Pg. 32 and pp. 58-60.
    12. Himka, John Paul. (1999). Religion and Nationality in Western Ukraine. McGill-Queen's University Press: Montreal and Kingston. Pg. 6.
    13. Himka, John Paul. (1999). Religion and Nationality in Western Ukraine. McGill-Queen's University Press: Montreal and Kingston. Pg. 10.
    14. Magoscy, R. (1996). A History of Ukraine. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    15. Unicorne (2020). "A Brief History of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church". Retrieved 20 February 2021.
    16. "ARTICLES ON THE HISTORY OF OUR JURISDICTION". Ukrainian Orthodox Church. July 25, 1999. Retrieved March 23, 2024.
    17. Zhukovsky, Arkadii (2005). "Autocephaly". Encyclopedia Of Ukraine. Retrieved March 23, 2024.
    18. Robert Conquest (1986). The harvest of sorrow: Soviet collectivization and the terror-famine. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 211–212. ISBN 0-19-505180-7.
    19. ^ Magosci, P. (1989). Morality and Reality: the Life and Times of Andrei Sheptytsky. Edmonton, Alberta: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, University of Alberta.
    20. The Impact of External Threat on States and Domestic Societies, Manus I. Midlarsky in Dissolving Boundaries, Blackwell Publishers, 2003, ISBN 1-4051-2134-3, Google Print, p.15
    21. ^ Subtelny, O. (1988). Ukraine: A History. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    22. After autocephaly, The Ukrainian Week (26 October 2018).
    23. (in Ukrainian) The Ecumenical Patriarchate unveiled documents in support of Ukrainian autocephaly, Gazeta.ua (14 September 2018).
    24. "Filaret (Denysenko)". www.pomisna.info.
    25. "Ukrainian Orthodox church". www.encyclopediaofukraine.com. Retrieved 9 January 2019.
    26. "Metropolitan Hilarion: Filaret Denisenko was and remains a schismatic". mospat.ru. 22 October 2018. Retrieved 29 October 2018.
    27. Mefford, Brian (February 23, 2021). "Rethinking Yushchenko". Atlantic Council. Retrieved August 31, 2024.
    28. "У Московського Патріархату - серйозні проблеми в Україні - Обозреватель". Obozrevatel.com. 2007-01-24. Retrieved 2019-01-16.
    29. ^ Православна церква України буде автокефальною - статут (повний текст документу) [The Orthodox Church of Ukraine will be autocephalous - the charter (full text of the document)]. РБК-Украина (in Russian). 15 December 2018. Retrieved 2018-12-30.
    30. Piter234903 (2018-12-15). "Statut". www.slideshare.net. Archived from the original on 2020-07-26. Retrieved 2019-01-10.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
    31. ^ "СМИ обнародовали проект устава ПЦУ, принятый на "объединительном Соборе"". spzh.news. 16 December 2018. Retrieved 2018-12-30.
    32. Panev, Jivko (2018-12-15). "Bishop Epiphaniy (Dumenko) elected Primate of the "Orthodox Church in Ukraine"". Orthodoxie. Retrieved 17 February 2021.
    33. Alya, Shandra (2018-12-16). "History in the making: future Ukrainian Orthodox Church elects its Primate |". Euromaidan Press. Retrieved 2018-12-17.
    34. Ukrainian Catholic University (15 December 2018). "Metropolitan Epifaniy (Dumenko) becomes Primate of One Local Orthodox Church of Ukraine". Retrieved 17 February 2021.
    35. Interfax Religion (15 December 2018). "Metropolitan Epiphany of "Kyiv Patriarchate" elected as leader of "local Orthodox church" in Ukraine". Retrieved 17 February 2021.
    36. Ukrainian Catholic University (2 January 2019). "At New Year ceremony, Patriarch Bartholomew confirms his intention to give Tomos before Christmas". Retrieved 17 February 2021.
    37. ^ Ukrainian Catholic University (5 January 2019). "Patriarch Bartholomew signs Tomos of autocephaly of Orthodox Church of Ukraine". Retrieved 17 February 2021.
    38. ^ Ukrainian Catholic University (6 January 2019). "Ukraine receives Tomos officially and forever". Retrieved 17 February 2021.
    39. La Croix (with Agence France Presse) (5 January 2019). "L'Église d'Ukraine officiellement créée par le patriarche Bartholomée" [The church of Ukraine officially created by Patriarch Bartholomew]. La Croix (in French). Retrieved 17 February 2021.
    40. ^ Президент України прибув у Стамбул [President of Ukraine arrived in Istanbul]. www.ukrinform.ua (in Ukrainian). 5 January 2019. Retrieved 2019-01-05.
    41. "President took part in the solemn handing over of the Tomos of autocephaly of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church in Istanbul". Official website of the President of Ukraine. 6 January 2019. Retrieved 2019-01-06.
    42. "Petro Poroshenko at the ceremony of signing the Tomos: At last, God has bestowed the Orthodox Church of Ukraine upon us". Official website of the President of Ukraine. 5 January 2019. Retrieved 2019-01-05.
    43. Ukrainian Catholic University (5 January 2019). "Patriarch Bartholomew: "Prince Vladimir and Saint Olga are present in spirit and prayer, sharing our joy and pleasure"". Retrieved 17 February 2021.
    44. Ukrainian Catholic University (5 January 2019). "Серед 15 зірок автокефальних православних Церков з'явилася українська зірочка!, – Петро Порошенко" [Among the 15 stars of the Autocephalous Orthodox Churches there was a Ukrainian star ! – Petro Poroshenko]. Retrieved 17 February 2021.
    45. "Metropolitan Epifaniy thanked Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew for signing the Tomos". 5 January 2019. Retrieved 17 February 2021.
    46. Unian Information Agency (6 January 2019). "Ecumenical Patriarch hands tomos of autocephaly over to leader of Orthodox Church of Ukraine (Video, photos)". Retrieved 17 February 2021.
    47. "President took part in the solemn handing over of the Tomos of autocephaly of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church in Istanbul". Official website of the President of Ukraine. 6 January 2019. Retrieved 2019-01-07.
    48. "Petro Poroshenko at the ceremony of signing the Tomos: At last, God has bestowed the Orthodox Church of Ukraine upon us". Official website of the President of Ukraine. 5 January 2019. Retrieved 2019-01-07.
    49. Ukrainian Catholic University (9 January 2019). "Ukrainian Tomos signed by all members of Holy Synod of Ecumenical Patriarchate". Retrieved 17 February 2021.
    50. Unian Information Agency (9 January 2019). "Tomos for Ukraine Church signed by all members of Constantinople Synod". Retrieved 17 February 2021.
    51. ^ "Archbishop: Members of Ecumenical Patriarchate's Synod sign public copy of tomos for Ukraine". KyivPost. 2019-01-09. Retrieved 2019-01-09.
    52. В ПЦУ пояснили, чому томос ще раз повертався у Стамбул. zik.ua (in Ukrainian). 9 January 2019. Archived from the original on 2019-01-09. Retrieved 2019-01-09.
    53. ^ "Що з підписами під томосом і чому його повертають до Стамбула". BBC News Україна. 2019-01-08. Retrieved 2019-01-09.
    54. Interfax Religion (5 January 2019). "New church of Ukraine may not appoint bishops or establish parishes outside of Ukraine". Retrieved 20 February 2021.
    55. Pravoslaviye v Ukraine Retrieved on 10 February 2007 Archived 29 October 2007 at the Wayback Machine
    56. "Resolution of the Council of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of May 27, 2022". Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate) (in Ukrainian). 2022-05-27. Retrieved 2022-05-27.
    57. "Ukraine's Moscow-backed Orthodox church says cuts ties with Russia". Alarabiya News. 2022-05-27. Retrieved 2022-05-27.
    58. "Resolutions of the Council of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of May 27, 2022". 28 May 2022.
    59. "Звіт Керуючого справами Української Православної Церкви за 2022 рік". 24 December 2022.
    60. "Слово на вручення жезла єпископу Боярському Веніаміну, вікарію Київської митрополії". 3 January 2023.
    61. У Канаді відкрили перший храм УПЦ Retrieved on 16 December 2019
    62. "На злобу дня". Starovery.ru. Retrieved 2019-01-16.
    63. "Ukrainian Catholic churches in Ukraine (in Ukrainian)". Archived from the original on 2007-11-16. Retrieved 2007-11-24.
    64. Archived 2007-09-27 at the Wayback Machine
    65. "Eparchies in Ukraine (in Ukrainian)". Archived from the original on 2007-11-15. Retrieved 2007-11-24.
    66. "Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church in Russia site (in Ukrainian)". Ugcc-in-russia.narod.ru. Retrieved 2019-01-16.
    67. ^ "Roman Catholicism in Ukraine, RISU Portal, in Ukrainian". Archived from the original on 2012-12-22. Retrieved 2007-10-07.
    68. Roman Catholic church in Ukraine statistics (in Ukrainian)
    69. "Rusyn". Rusyn. Archived from the original on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2019-01-16.
    Sources

    Further reading

    Main article: Bibliography of Ukrainian history

    External links

    Part of a series on the
    History of Ukraine
    Topics
    Early history
    Middle Ages
    Early Modern period
    Modern history
    Contemporary Ukraine
  • General
  • Churches
  • Christianity in Ukraine
    Eastern Orthodoxy
    Autocephalous
    Autonomous
    Noncanonical
    Former
    Oriental Orthodoxy
    Catholicism
    Latin Church
    Eastern Catholic
    Papal recognition
    Independent
    Protestantism
    Baptist
    Lutheran
    Reformed
    Pentecostal
    Other Protestant
    Non-trinitarian
    Declared spiritual independence in May 2022 from Moscow Patriarchate
    History of Christianity
    Centuries
    Origins and
    Apostolic Age
    Ante-Nicene
    period
    Late antiquity
    (Great Church)
    Catholicism
    Eastern
    Christianity
    Middle Ages
    Reformation
    and
    Protestantism
    Lutheranism
    Calvinism
    Anglicanism
    Anabaptism
    1640–1789
    1789–present
    History of Christianity in Europe
    Sovereign states
    States with limited
    recognition
    Dependencies and
    other entities
    Ukraine articles
    History
    Chronology
    By topic
    Geography
    Politics
    Economy
    Society
    Culture
    Demographics
    Category: