User talk:WikiEditor2004: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 21:49, 5 September 2006 editGoran.S2 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers4,989 editsm →NS ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 02:52, 27 November 2024 edit undoBearian (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Rollbackers84,481 edits →Proposed deletion of Veliki Rit, Banat: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== ~~Old talks~~ ==		==New topic==
			== Welcome Back ==
	*]
			Welcome back. I look forward to having better cooperation with you in future. --] (]) 16:27, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
	*]
			:I am not quite back. Just blanked my user page. I am currently too busy with other things in life, so that I can only afford time to deal with some issues in Wikimedia Commons, but not in various Wikipedias. Besides that, I am now working on some real projects in real life and wasting my time on something which people with various political agendas can attack, disrupt or delete at any time looks really pointless to me. ] 06:07, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
	*]
			:: Unless you are sitting on some cloud carving a sequel to ], I doubt you will be able to create anything that people with various political agendas will not be able to attack, disrupt or destroy. . If somebody 3,500 years later changes the text you wrote on online Misplaced Pages, it would not be ]. All the best.--] (]) 21:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
	*]
			:::Hi. Would you be so kind to make a map based on map number 6 after page 66 in ?. Thanks in advance.--] (]) 18:01, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

			== Your signature ==
	== Post new comments or questions here ==
	Hi PANONIAN. I had no bad intention when deleting your articles about Svans, Mingrelians and Adjarians. They cannot be classified as separate ethnic groups, because they share the same ethnic and national identity as other Georgians despite Mingrelians and Svans speaking also their own languages, and part of Adjarians being Muslim. Current definitions seem acceptable to me, but I'm afraid these articles essentially duplicate info in the corresponding articles on regions. Thanks, --] 04:02, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

			Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <code><nowiki><font></nowiki></code> tags, which are causing ] lint errors.
	==South slavic languages==
	I noticed you reverted my linguistic map becasue it didn't include all five "serbo-croatian" languages. Now let me ask you, what are the other two? Bosnian, croatian and serbian are the only three official languages as I recall. But to call them "serbo-croatian languages" is really stupid, wrong and kind of laughable - considering that Bosnian language is older than both serbian and croatian. But anyhow what are the other two? Finally I couldn't help to see that you support the aim of the palestines at the same time as you support the aim of serbs in bosnia, funny how you support justice and goodness (palestines) on one side when you support eavil and injustice (serb politics in bosnia) on the other. At least that's my opinion ]

			You are encouraged to change
			: <code><nowiki>]</nowiki></code> : ]

			to
	==Some Help Needed==
			: <code><nowiki>]</nowiki></code> : ]

			—] (]) 08:41, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
	Hi Pannonian. I see you natively speak Serbian and I'm wondering if you could do a word by word translation of the ] article from the Serbian Misplaced Pages into English. Here's the linke ]. It doesn't have to be perfect English - just a rought translation I can use to organize into an article. I'll handle the grammar and spelling. :D Thank you so much. ] 19:16, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
			== ] of ] ==
			]

			The file ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	== sockpuppet?????????? ==
			<blockquote>Orphaned map.</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	HOW DARE U ACCUSE ME OF THAT? WHERE AND WHO?? POLITIS ] 00:37, 18 August 2006 (UTC)??

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	00:22, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

			Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ~ ]<sup style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">]</sup> 16:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
	== What proof ==

			== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==
	What hard core evidence.

			{{Ivmbox\|Hello, PANONIAN. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
	And thats some Serb school book. Not wat others believe ] 00:36, 18 August 2006 (UTC).

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	== Request ==

			If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
	Hey PANONIAN,
			\|Scale of justice 2.svg\|imagesize=40px}}
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/08&oldid=866998273 -->
			==] nomination of ]==
			]

			A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a ], a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
	In the ] article, the link for Rusyns in Serbia in the infobox leads to ]. The article itself appears to be unreferenced, are all of the stats from the 2002 Census? If so, that should be cited in the Rusyns article instead of the Misplaced Pages article per ]. —<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">]</span> 20:19, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

			If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 02:51, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
	:Thanks, that's great. —<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">]</span> 20:38, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	::Yeah, I noticed. :p I'll delete it just because I'm just reinforcing the rule that permabanned users can't edit. —<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">]</span> 20:51, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 17:09, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
	:::Interesting! :) According to the ''Atlas and Gazetteer of Historic Hungary 1914'' by Talma Kiadó, Slovak is "Szlovák" in Hungarian. I guess "Tót" is derogatory today? —<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">]</span> 21:09, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
			==] nomination of ]==
			]

			A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a ], a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
	::::Hmm. Do you know anything about ]? I recently created the article but it got nominated for ]. It used to have information in the "Hungarians" section, but Juro deleted it. :( —<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">]</span> 21:14, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

			If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 02:59, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
	:::::No problem. As for the various peoples of the world, I checked that whole list, and unfortunately couldn't find any redirects. Perhaps I'll create one of the pages someday, but I have other stuff to do at the moment. I love the idea of the list, however. Sorry I couldn't help. :( —<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">]</span> 21:33, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
			==] nomination of ]==
			]

			A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a ], a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
	::::::Well, good luck then! —<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">]</span> 21:39, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

			If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 02:39, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
	== Gone Quiet ==

			== Spam on ] ==
	Gone quiet havent you????

			Hi!
	] 04:59, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

			You are target of spamming on user talkpages and ] on Slovene Misplaced Pages. This is mainly caused by random IP (212.200.XX.XX). Here are some revisions: , , . This event is perodic and I think it's fair to point out mentioning of your name. If these edits are anonymously (in a shape of IP-edit) connected with you, please stop.
	Disregard that comment, just debate properly and dont accuse me of sockpuppetry. I still have no idea who is the sockpuppet u accused me of the first time.

	] 07:36, 23 ~~August~~ ~~2006~~ (UTC)		With regards, --] (]) 08:32, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			<div class="afd-notice">
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	== Veeeery sneaky ==

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
	If you want to change the name of the article ], '''be bold''', propose it the others, don't change links in the backgrouns like coward!
			<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 19:37, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
			== "]" listed at ] ==
			]
			The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink\|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 5#Romance peoples}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] <sup>]</sup> 16:49, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
			==] has been nominated for merging==

			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 18:13, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
	--] 00:19, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
			== ] of ] ==
	----
			]
	Listen, you could be right or wrong!

			The article ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	If you are right, then the article name will be changed and then you can chenge the links.
			<blockquote>'''No other topics named Bosut documented at this time that use the term as a proper name, and hatnote already in place at the primary topic (instead of linking this)'''</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	If you are wrong, the article will stay the same and you have no reason to change the links.

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	I just can see logic in changing the links while article stays the same. And if something is going to change, it '''has to start''' with the article name. You behave exactly like person who knows he's wrong and without arguments!

			Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 17:34, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
	--] 00:34, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
			==] nomination of ]==
	----
			]
	Hey! is vandalism. You are not a newbie here!!! You '''know''' how wrong and against the rules is this what you have just done! There is a procedure for this! man, what's wrong with you? Stop behaving like a spoiled kid! If you are wrong, just learn to live with that!

			A tag has been placed on ] indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a ], a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under ].
	--] 00:38, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

			If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and removing the speedy deletion tag. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 01:07, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
	== Srbi na Wiki==
			==] nomination of ]==
	Neznam di su Hrvati na Misplaced Pages. Sigurno nije ih briga..a bolje jer mene pece kad neko mota laz na Wiki.
			]
	Kako ja vidim Wiki je pustio mnogo Srba da minjaju stranice kako oni oce. Nazalost mnogo sto oni minjaju nije istina nego samo njihovo misljenje. Sto je jos gore neki Englez ili bilo koji stranac ce procitat i milsit da je Misplaced Pages istina.
	Gluposti da je Boscovich Srb itd..........
	Kako mogu spavat kad tako lazu???????????
	JOJ
	] 04:03, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
	--------
	Da ti kazem pravo ja nemam nista protiv Srba..za mene su vecina dorbi ljudi...samo mrzim kad neko gura svoju politiki kao neki purger na Misplaced Pages.
	Vidio sam svasta naprimjer,
	Dalmatinci su Srbi, Dubrovcani su Srbi, Andric je Srb, Boka njie imala Hrvate nego to su Srpski katolici, Bosanci su Srpski Mulsimani a ne Hrvatski muslimani itd....sve je njihova verzija ..sve sto onaj Vuk je mislio i govorio Srbima neki vjeruju ...da smo svi Srbi, pa nemoj...
	Ja znam da smo misani jedni i drugi i da smo Slaveni po imenima...ali glupo je samo gurat da su Hrvati Srbi..Pa moguce je da su Srbi svi Hrvati isto tako.
	Mrzim ovaj topic ali kad citas laz tesko se ne uzbunit malo. Boje meni ne citat ovaj Wiki.

			A tag has been placed on ] indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a ], a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under ].
	--
	Sto spavas Javi se ...
	] 04:33, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

			If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and removing the speedy deletion tag. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 01:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
	Ti bi trebao napista na svoj user page"Interested in Croatian people and history" jer vidim da se i tamo nalzis pod discussion...Nista protiv ..ali to je istina.
			==] nomination of ]==
	Vidim da te intersira Hrvatska isto kao i Srbija. Nista protiv.
			]
	Drago mi je cuti jer povezana je nasa povjest sa vason ali nazalost nemozemo se nikako slagati ko od nas govori istinu a ko laze. To je politika i crkva kriva i oni kao Vuk.

			A tag has been placed on ] indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a ], a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under ].
	Opet nista protiv..dragi moj susjed sa Balkana
	] 05:20, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

			If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and removing the speedy deletion tag. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 01:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
	== Edit war ==
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			<div class="afd-notice">
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	I find edits like to be disruption of Misplaced Pages. Therefore I have posted a note on and hereby I warn you that I will block you for 24 hours if you do something like that again. --] 11:27, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 20:33, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
	== Austria Hungary ==
			==] nomination of ]==
			]

			A tag has been placed on ] indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a ], a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under ].
	My solution is that the ] will appear as a sub-category of ] etc. I think that will solve your problem. ] <small><font color="#008822">]</font></small> 21:37, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
	:OK ] <small><font color="#008822">]</font></small> 21:44, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

			If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and removing the speedy deletion tag. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 01:12, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
	:The second was just to bring it in line with the ] <small><font color="#008822">]</font></small> 21:54, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
			==] has been nominated for merging==
	:I am busy doing that, but that costs some time. ] <small><font color="#008822">]</font></small> 21:56, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 00:13, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
	I am an administrator but do not have a Internet bot. ] <small><font color="#008822">]</font></small> 22:02, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

			==] has been nominated for merging to {{Cl\|Montenegrin people}}==
	Do you know how I can run a Internet bot. ] <small><font color="#008822">]</font></small> 22:06, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for merging to {{Cl\|Montenegrin people}}. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 00:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
	==Crişana==
			==] nomination of ]==
	From what I know, it roughly corresponds to Partium. I cannot really tell to what measure myself, but I know they override each other for a portion of their respective territories (a big one? a smaller one? can't really tell, since Crişana was never defined objectively). ] 22:09, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
			]
	:Add to this that Romanian sources tend not to care enough to expalin a concept. They just refer to it :). ] 22:28, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
	I think that the Partium map is stretched to cover regions that are not considered Partium-proper. I think that the change occured when Banat added an ambiguity (since no one was speaking of the Banat at the time when Partium was an actual province of Hungary, and the Hungarian meaning became reduced to a portion of it). I have little knowledge of distinctions of sovereignty under Hungarian medieval laws, and they may be the cause for the ambiguity. ] 22:51, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

			A tag has been placed on ] indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a ], a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under ].

			If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and removing the speedy deletion tag. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 01:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
	== Izvini ==
			==] has been nominated for renaming==
	Ja sam direktiro moje misljenje na samo neke Srbe na Wikipidia (manjina), ne bas samo tebe, izvini. Ja ih neznam po imenu samo vidim da na Misplaced Pages cesto se minja informacija na Srpsku verziju. Ja znam da si ti posten i skolovan Srbin i zato bi zamolio da ako znas te Srbe koji minjaju historiju bezeve, treba njima reci da pristanu. Na kraju sve ta misljenja su verzije and ne istine. Trebamo ostavit informaciju kako je bila prije a ne minjat jer se nekom nesvida.
	Molim te ko brata treba se to pristat..jer u oci drugih vani Balkana opte ce oni vidit da se Srbi i Hrvati ne slazu..za ovu glupost ispadamo budale jedni i drugi.
	Ima i nasih koji nisu Fair...ali kako vidim neki Srbi su vise se ugrijali da minjaju sto god mogu da zvuci na Srpsku verziju. Nije Fair.
	Pozdrav
	Javi se
	] 23:03, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 02:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
	== Old maps ==
			==] nomination of ]==
			]

			A tag has been placed on ] indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a ], a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under ].
	Before you get surprised. In making it in accordance to the Commons at Wikimedia, I am recategorizing Ancient and Facsimile maps to Old maps. Now we have three categories, this will be one with subcategories. ] <small><font color="#008822">]</font></small> 12:51, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

			If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and removing the speedy deletion tag. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 05:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
	== Serbs: Caucasian origin? ==
			==] nomination of ]==
			]

			A tag has been placed on ] indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a ], a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under ].
	Could you please take a look at ]? I figure you will have a clue what is going on here. - ] \| ] 00:32, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

			If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and removing the speedy deletion tag. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 05:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
	:I think that this addition to Serbs article is a copy from one web site that I recently saw. However, it is only one theory about the origin of Serbs, and much of things from that edit are already mentioned in this article: ]. Since there are more than one theories about this, the proper place for all of them is that article, not Serbs article. ] ] 00:08, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
			== "]" listed at ] ==
	:: Thanks. Looks like someone has now reverted. - ] \| ] 04:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
			]
			The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink\|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 28#Duchy of Saint Sava}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ]] 17:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
			==] has been nominated for deletion==

			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 11:26, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
	== Industrija ==
			== ] of ] ==
			]

			The article ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	Само да кажем да фабрика намештаја "Жарко Зрењанин" више не постоји, а пивара је обуставила производњу. ИПК "Серво Михаљ" не постоји још од 1992. ] 18:51, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
			<blockquote>'''Disambiguation page not required (]). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.'''</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	== Good man ==
	upravu si....bojle se nama svima ne brinuti puno od onim Srbima koji pise i minjaju historiju na Wiki ...jer na kraju lupas glavu od zid...a to ti neki Srbi i hoce....
	Te ljude nemozes zaustavit jer su toliko ugrijani protiv Hrvatske da moraju sto vise izmislit protiv nje da je unistu..zao mi je da ima takvih ljudi i jos danas.
	Na kraju Truth will come out ..it always does...
	Ja nebi nikom preporucio citat Wiki jer bilo ko moze da minja clanke i mnogo Srba jesu vec napravili ih u Srb POV.
	Na primjer u vezi Rudjera Boscovoicha uvjek se spominjalo da je on bio pola Hrvat i pola Talijan a sad od jedan put (zadjih 10-15 godina)neki Srbin tumaci da je Boscovich Srbin...pa glupost.
	Ja samo imam jedno pitanje ZASTO? Zasto treba to sad minjati?
	Zasto u zadnji recimo 10 godina sve i svi koji imaju link sa Croatia moraju imati link sa Srbima? Sto sa otim ocete? Sto ocete reci da su svi Hrvati po pravu Srpske krvi?
	Ja nerazumin. Ja bi samo rekao da ja mislim da ima nekih Srba koji su puno jelos od Hrvata pa zato idu okolo minjat informaciju i povjest. Neznam sto drugo da mislim kad vidim ovo.
	Zao mi jer milsim da je vrime novo i danas je 2006...kad se moze oprostit Njemcu moze se oprostit izmedu nas.
	Jel tako?

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	] 03:34, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

			Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 19:18, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
	==Srijemska mitrovica==
			==] nomination of ]==
	Da, Srijemska mitrovica je prema hrv. povijesnim zemljovidima (i još par knjiga koje su tiskane u razdoblju poslije raspada Jugoslavije) prikazana kao dio Drinske banovine (skupa s Županjom, Vinkovcima i Vukovarom) u razdoblju 1929 -1931, čak je i jedan geopolitičar (Mladen Klemenčić) imao par zanimljivih izlaganja na tu temu. Ova karta prikazuje stanje iz 1931 (ako bolje promotriš na karti nigdje ne piše iz koje je godine). Nažalost ništa od tih podataka nisam mogao naći na webu.
			]

			A tag has been placed on ] indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under ].
	] 01:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
	==Image tagging for Image:Serbia01.gif==
	Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

			If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and removing the speedy deletion tag. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 13:26, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
	For more information on using images, see the following pages:
	*]
	*]

			== ] of ] ==
	This is an automated notice by ]. For assistance on the image use policy, see ]. 09:56, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
			]

			The article ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	== Thanks ==
			<blockquote>'''Unreferenced and unimproved almost 15 years. No reliable sources online Google news, newspapers, books, or scholar. Run of the mill, very small village. Not enough information to merge.'''</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	Thanks for your work at ] ] <small><font color="#008822">]</font></small> 14:15, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

			Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 02:52, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
	== Question ???? ==

	Tesko mi je razumit ono sto si pisao na moj talk. Ali vidim di ides sa tin comentima, pa nema problema.
	"Can't judge a book by its cover" tako nesto.
	-------

	MOLIM ODGOVOR NA OVO

	Uvezi "Theories on origin of Serbs" na wiki
	Nigdi ne pise da je moguce da su Hrvati i Srbi siti narod...kad gledas obo dvoje imaju price da su iz Irana, Perisa...obo dvoje imaju kontakt sa Alans Celts Avars Romans Illyrians itd.....
	obo dvoje su postali Slaveni i uzeli novi jezik i vjeru.
	dolsi su sesto-sedmo stoljece u Europe, isto vrjeme
	'''Sto ti mislis''' jer ako smo isti onda je glupo se pripirati sto je bio Tesla i Andric...

	Interesantno je da jos postoji ta mrznja izmedu nasih kad neki "historians" otvoreno govore da su Hrvati i Srbi isti narod...

	Mozda bi ti moga napravit jedan novi page za ovaj topic ...jer stvarno imamo mi puni in Common..volili ili ne..to je istina i nemoze se kriti.

	Croatian and Serbian link...moglo bi to se metit na page "Theories on Serb origin" kad vec spomijes druge verzije, mogli bi i ovu.


	javi se

	PS Dobar je page...jako mi se svida..bilo bi dorbro kad bi Hrvati isto tako napravili jedan page od ORIGIN.

	] 03:58, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


	== Panonian??? ==

	Zasto se Srbin zove Panonian?
	Objasni meni molim te, ja neznam puno o tome ...kako Srbi imaju link sa Pannonia kad je Pannonia bila prije nego Srbija i Srbi u Evropi..Panonci su bili narod slicni Ilirima a ne Srbi...moguce da su misani sa tadasnjin Dalmatincima i kasnje Hrvatima pa i mozda Srbima.
	Neznam....mozda ti znas link za to.
	Izvini ali meni zvuci to ime za Srba smisno kao da ja Hrvat zoven sebe Kosovo..ista stvar.
	logika kaze meni da se tebi samo to ime svida pa zato si ga uzeo.


	] 06:02, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

	== Arbitration request on Kosovo ==
	Dear Editor, since you have been involved in editing the ] article in the last months, and that article has been the subject of long ongoing edit wars, your name is listed in the ] on this matter. You can make a statement here: ]. Due to the large number of editors involved, however, I would to ask you to keep your statement concise and to the point. If you feel you have not been substantially involved in the disputes surrounding the ] article, please do not remove your name from the Arbitration request, but rather make a short statement there explaining why you feel you have not been involved enough to be part it. To understand my reasons for requesting Arbitration, please read my statement on the Requests for Arbitration page. Best regards, ] 10:17, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

	== CheckUser ==
	Dear PANONIAN, I wonder if you can help me. There are several IPs from Hungary that either vandalize articles about Slovakia or work in collusion while editing them. ] accused them to be sockpuppets of ] and ]. I believe that these charges unfounded. However, an ] perceives them as disruptive behavior. Before the situation escalates further, it would be definitely good to clarify whether there is sockpuppetry involved in this case. Since you have much more experience with Misplaced Pages than I do, perhaps you can advise me where and how I can initiate the formal procedure of checking whether some users and IPs are just sockpuppets. Thank you very much in advance. ] 19:47, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

	:Thanks for your help. You are right, it does not seem to be very helpful. But this practice (use of sockpuppets while editing sensitive articles) should be dealt with. Well, thank you anyway. ] 00:45, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

	== Javi se P ==

	Ajde javise ...molim odgovor na ona pitanje gore kad imas vrimena...Hvala unaprid

	] 23:02, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


	== Hvala na odgovor ==

	Ja isto milsim da ako ujedinimo ili napravimo neki Srbro-Croatian origin page da nekima se nece svidati to.
	Za moj pojam ja mislim da su drukciji narod ali nakon mnogo godina i kad su preuzeli i postali Slaveni ..tada se narod misao sa svih strana ...zato je tesko reci da nisu isti jer mnogo se pomisalo.
	Sam si reko da Srbi su misani sa Ilirima, ako je to istaina (ja prvi put cujem to) a isto to kazu za Hrvate da su oni misani sa onim starim Dalmatinskin Ilirima...tako da Srbi i Hrvati su misani sa jedan drugin a isto tako sa drugima.
	Vrlo je tesko pogit istinu u vezi origin ali mislim da su Hrvati i Srbi dva drugcija naroda bili u Persia ali kad su dolazili na Balkan su se misali sa jedan drugin.

	Imali neki DNA test...pa da se vidi jeli su isti??
	Nebi se iznenadio da neki Hrvat koji milsi da je sto posto Hrvat po DNA sazna da je Srbin..i obratno.
	Ja bi reko da Srpski i Hrvatski DNA mora biti slican
	A u Bosni da negovoris..tu se najvise misalo sa jedan drugim i trecim...a mislim i u Slovenije a manje u Makedoniji.

	Sto to mislis??

	] 02:35, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

	== Hey ==

	http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:SFRYugoslaviaetno.jpg

	http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:SFRYugoslaviaetno2.jpg

	http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:SFRYugoslaviaetno3.jpg

	Meni licno sumnjivo izgledaju - jesi li siguran da su tacne ove slike? ] 16:16, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

	:Hmm, pa pogledaj http://www.rastko.org.yu/istorija/srbi-balkan/img/fry4b.jpg --] 11:31, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

	== Why ==
	And why doesn't this user support the aims of People in Kosovo?

	:The decision about status of Kosovo is already made, so it is only a technical question now, thus there is no reason to support people that already achieved their goal. ] ] 12:27, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

	== E, ==

	...pogledaj ]. Sto mislis o Medieval Ages? --] 12:32, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

	Da, jesu. Brankovic je bio ''Gospodar Kosova'', i to potpuno nezavisan. O Mrnjavcevicima znas - ''Gospodar svoj srpskoj, i grckoj makedoniji'' (za ovo drugo nisam siguran). To je vise nego dovoljno da ih svrstamo u nezavsne srpske zemlje. Nisam '''nijednu''' zemlju izbacio osim '''Serske drzave''', koju bismo mogli da vratimo. Ovako kako je bilo do sada, moglo bi i "Drzava kralja Stefana Radoslava", "Drzava kralja Urosa", itd. kapiras? --] 13:01, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

	Uhh, boga ti imas pravo - nisam mogao da se setim imena njihovih drzava (pogledacu titule, po tome mogu da odredim). --] 14:26, 3 September 2006 (UTC)


	== DNA ==

	Ćudo je da niko nije probao vidit jeli imaju Srbi i Hvati isti dna.
	A moguče je da se zna ali nije popularno to znati i govorit ljudima...nije u interes političara hahaha.
	Ako nešto saznaš javi se ok///
	Mene baš interesira
	U vezi Bosanaca isto tako bi bilo intersantno vidit....mismim da mora biti link izmedu sva 3 barem 60% krvi.

	Javi se OK


	PS I like you for your unbias view on all things Balkan, you're a legend...Panonian for President of Wiki

	] 23:12, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

	==]==
	Hello,

	An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: ]. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, ]. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, ].

	On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, --] 16:53, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

	== Okruzi ==

	Mislim da okruge ne treba stavljati u kategoriju "Geografija Vojvodine". Kapiram da u geografiju idu neke geografske celine/reke/planine/regije i sl., a ne političke podele. --] 13:43, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
	:mislim da nije potrebno. Ne znam da li si video tu granicu, ali granica više ide na Bačku stranu, nego na Baranjsku... samo jedna mala ada ide na deo Baranje. --] 14:07, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

	Pa mislim da ne bi trebalo, pošto su to jako mali delovi koji pripadaju Srbiji, tj Hrvatskoj.

	...i još nešto. Tebi ovo kažem pošto najviše i puniš te kategorije, koliko sam primetio. Ovo sam samo uglavnom primetio u tekstovima o Srbiji, dok je u državama Amerike, UKa i sličnih država sa regijama to lepo podeljeno po regijama. Mislim da imamo tekstove u previše kategorija stavljeno. Treba izbaciti "Geografija Srbije", "Naseljena mesta u Srbiji", "Istorija Srbije" i sl. kategorije na tekstovima koji su već svrstani u kategoriju "Geografija Vojvodine", "Naseljena mesta u Vojvodini" i sl. Zato što sve kategorije o Vojvodini su podkategorije Srbije, pa se vec svrstava pod kategoriju o Srbiji, nekako bi bilo preglednije. Na srpskoj vikipediji su se svi složili samnom, pa sam sredio takve kategorije tamo. --] 15:26, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

	:Ok, razumemo se, samo bi sve mesta trebalo podeliti u tri kategorije, naseljena mesta Vojvodine, Srbije i Kosova. Albanci su baš lepo sva mesta na Kosovu stavili samo u kategoriju o Kosovu :lol: :)
	Samo bi trebalo nešto razdvojiti, ne znam tko bi to mogao uraditi. Kategoriju "Cities, towns and villages in Serbia", trebalo bi podeliti u dve kategorije: "Cities in Serbia" i "Towns and villages in Serbia", kao i Vojvodine. To je jedna veća greška, pošto status grada ima samo Bgd, NS, Niš, Priština i Kg, sve ostalo je "Towns and villages". Znam da takve promene na srpskoj wiki radi bot, pa znas li kako bi se to moglo promeniti? --] 18:22, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

	Ok, sigurno je da se neće menjati Vojvodina, samo ce se valja praviti neke regije u centralnoj Srbiji, a pošto najviše ima članaka o naseljima u Vojvodini... nikad nije kasno da se iz gradova i naselja Vojvodine izbaci kategorija "nasljena mesta Srbije", zar ne? ... a onda što je ostalo u cities, towns and villages in Serbia podeliti na novu situaciju kako god bude u nekoj budućnosti. --] 19:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

	:u pravu si, jbg :) --] 20:42, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

	== RfA ==
	Hi. Perhaps you will be interested in because VinceB threatened you as well there. ] 15:31, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

	== Križevci (former county) move proposal ==

	You might want to discuss move proposals at ]. I am not specifically advocating a change but think these type of moves should be discussed first. - <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;">]</span> 18:08, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

	== editing ==

	==come take a look==

	hey panonian--

	i've recently made a policy proposal change for 3RR. i noticed you were accused of 3RR a short time ago though i can't tell if you were blocked. i'm not sure my suggested changes would have helped in your case, but the idea is spell things out more clearly so people aren't blocked unexpectedly or unfairly and don't end up bitter about wikipedia. you might have suggestions of your own that would help the policy.

	here are the proposals

	http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Three-revert_rule#Proposed_policy_changes

	comments are welcome.

	thanks!
	] 19:38, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

	== NS ==

	Pa nije mi to namera, ali bi trebalo napraviti šablon za gradska i prigradska naselja NSa, kao na sr wiki. Hteo sam na proleće, ali sam ipak to ostavio za jesen (kad mi prođe novembarski ispitni rok) da odem do informativnog centra NSa, da mi daju neku literaturu o gradu. Posto na sajtu grada NEMA NIŠTA korisnoga, a i da ukapiramo kako funkcioniraju te naše mistesriozne gradske opštine NS i Petrovaradin (kako sad izgleda, kao da to postoji na papiru) i neke kulturne informacije pa da ubacim na sr i en wiki. Mislim da ovaj tekst može biti izabrani na sr, a na en wiki makar neka B kategorija, samo da imamo prave informacije o gradu (što je teško iskopati).

	To mi je nekako plan ove jeseni ili zime da kuckam na wikipediji, samo nabavim prave informacije, pa ako imas ti neke informacije ubacuj u tekst. --] 21:06, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
	:Od NSa mi treba sve, od kvartova do kulture, sporta, do gradskih opština (o kojima nitko ne zna ništa) ... ma sve. Tekst o NSa na engleskoj wiki je manje-više samo nabrajanje, sem istorije gde ima teksta. Ako imas istorija Rotkvarije, to mi treba :)

	Ja sam to radio na srpskoj vikipediji, mogu nešto da prebacim, ali ne mogu ti mogu garantovati pošto je na sr wiki BAŠ bilo naporno sređivati to. Ali nemoj ništa prebacivati u centalnu srbiju, ostavi ta mesta u Srbija kategoriji, samo za Vojvodinu prebaci. Centralna Srbija će se menjati sigurno u sledećih 6 mes/ do godinu dana, pa da ne menjeas sto puta. Jer centralna Srbija i nije nikakva politička celina, regija to je samo Srbija bez pokrajina, pa onda i nije potrena posebna kategorija, po nekom gledanju na stvari. U bivšoj Jugi je postojala Uža Srbija, to je nešto drugo. --] 21:27, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
	:Pa mislim da grešiš, pošto centralna Srbija ne postoji kao region, niti kao politička celina i vlast u centralnoj Srbiji ide direktno od vrha, dok u pokrajnama ima neka regionalna vlast, pa ne vidim da imamo takvu kategoriju.
	Kad sam ja prebaciovao na sr wiki, 80% je prebačeno u nasljena mesta Vojvodine, tako da će i ovde ispasti da bi više radio. Ja sada jurim da upišem drugu godinu, pa sam u frci.. ne mogu toliko posla uzeti.

Latest revision as of 02:52, 27 November 2024

New topic

Welcome Back

Welcome back. I look forward to having better cooperation with you in future. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 16:27, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

I am not quite back. Just blanked my user page. I am currently too busy with other things in life, so that I can only afford time to deal with some issues in Wikimedia Commons, but not in various Wikipedias. Besides that, I am now working on some real projects in real life and wasting my time on something which people with various political agendas can attack, disrupt or delete at any time looks really pointless to me. PANONIAN 06:07, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Unless you are sitting on some cloud carving a sequel to Ten Commandments, I doubt you will be able to create anything that people with various political agendas will not be able to attack, disrupt or destroy. All pyramids were looted soon after they were built. If somebody 3,500 years later changes the text you wrote on online Misplaced Pages, it would not be the End of the World. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Would you be so kind to make a map based on map number 6 after page 66 in this work?. Thanks in advance.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 18:01, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

] : PANONIAN

—Anomalocaris (talk) 08:41, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Bugarskaetn.png

The file File:Bugarskaetn.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃ 16:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, PANONIAN. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Central Serbia

A tag has been placed on Category:Central Serbia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Liz 02:51, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Republika Srpska (1992–1995) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Republika Srpska (1992–1995) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Republika Srpska (1992–1995) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 17:09, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Apatin images

A tag has been placed on Category:Apatin images requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Subotica images

A tag has been placed on Category:Subotica images requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

Spam on sl:wiki

Hi!

You are target of spamming on user talkpages and Village pump on Slovene Misplaced Pages. This is mainly caused by random IP (212.200.XX.XX). Here are some revisions: , , . This event is perodic and I think it's fair to point out mentioning of your name. If these edits are anonymously (in a shape of IP-edit) connected with you, please stop.

With regards, --A09090091 (talk) 08:32, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Union of Socialists of Vojvodina for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Union of Socialists of Vojvodina is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Union of Socialists of Vojvodina until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

SWinxy (talk) 19:37, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

"Romance peoples" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Romance peoples has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 5 § Romance peoples until a consensus is reached. #prodraxis 16:49, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Category:Azawad templates has been nominated for merging

Category:Azawad templates has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:13, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bosut (disambiguation)

The article Bosut (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No other topics named Bosut documented at this time that use the term as a proper name, and hatnote already in place at the primary topic (instead of linking this)

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joy (talk) 17:34, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Maps of the history of Central Europe

A tag has been placed on Category:Maps of the history of Central Europe indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz 01:07, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Maps of the history of Kosovo

A tag has been placed on Category:Maps of the history of Kosovo indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz 01:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Maps of the history of the Balkans

A tag has been placed on Category:Maps of the history of the Balkans indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz 01:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Bosut (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bosut (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bosut (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Joy (talk) 20:33, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Images of Kosovo

A tag has been placed on Category:Images of Kosovo indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz 01:12, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:Maps of the history of North Macedonia has been nominated for merging

Category:Maps of the history of North Macedonia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:13, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:Ethnic Montenegrin people has been nominated for merging to Category:Montenegrin people

Category:Ethnic Montenegrin people has been nominated for merging to Category:Montenegrin people. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 00:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Maps of municipalities of Vojvodina

A tag has been placed on Category:Maps of municipalities of Vojvodina indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz 01:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:Ethnic Hungarian politicians outside Hungary has been nominated for renaming

Category:Ethnic Hungarian politicians outside Hungary has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Images of the people of Vojvodina

A tag has been placed on Category:Images of the people of Vojvodina indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz 05:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Images of the Serbian people

A tag has been placed on Category:Images of the Serbian people indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz 05:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

"Duchy of Saint Sava" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Duchy of Saint Sava has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 28 § Duchy of Saint Sava until a consensus is reached. ౪ Santa ౪ 17:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Category:Sandžak has been nominated for deletion

Category:Sandžak has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:26, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Filić (disambiguation)

The article Filić (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Maps of Eastern Europe

A tag has been placed on Category:Maps of Eastern Europe indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. AusLondonder (talk) 13:26, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Veliki Rit, Banat

The article Veliki Rit, Banat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced and unimproved almost 15 years. No reliable sources online Google news, newspapers, books, or scholar. Run of the mill, very small village. Not enough information to merge.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.