Misplaced Pages

Melchizedek: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:53, 21 September 2016 editDonner60 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers235,873 editsm Reverted edits by 108.243.69.81 (talk): Editing tests (HG) (3.1.21)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:51, 11 December 2024 edit undoArgonautao0 (talk | contribs)17 edits Name: Fix broken wikt link 
(502 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Biblical Figure}}
{{Other uses}} {{Other uses}}
{{Infobox saint {{Infobox saint
Line 4: Line 5:
| birth_date = | birth_date =
| death_date = | death_date =
| feast_day = 22 May (])<br>26 August (]) | feast_day = {{plainlist|
* 22 May (])
| venerated_in = ], ], ], ]es, ], ], ], ], ]
* 26 August (])
| image = Meeting of abraham and melchizadek.jpg
}}
| venerated_in = {{plainlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}
| image = Abraham y Melquisedec, por Juan Antonio de Frías (cropped).jpg
| imagesize = 250px | imagesize = 250px
| caption =''Meeting of Abraham and Melchizedek'' by ], 1464–67 | caption =Detail from ''Abraham and Melchizedek'' by ], 1668
| birth_place = | birth_place =
| death_place = | death_place =
| titles = Priest, King of Salem | titles = ] and ] of ]
| canonized_date = | canonized_date = ]
| canonized_place = | canonized_place =
| canonized_by = | canonized_by =
Line 21: Line 35:
| issues = | issues =
}} }}
'''Melchizedek, Melkisetek, or Malki Tzedek''' ({{IPAc-en|m|ɛ|l|.|ˈ|k|ɪ|z|.|ə|.|d|ɪ|k}};<ref>English pronunciation according to the (lds.org; retrieved 2012-02-25), ]-ified from «mĕl-kĭz´a-dĭk»</ref> ]: {{Hebrew|מַלְכִּי־צֶדֶֿק}} malkī-ṣeḏeq; Amharic: መልከ ጼዴቅ {{lang|he-Latn|''malkī-ṣeḏeq''}}; ]: Մելքիսեդեք, ''Melkisetek''), is the king of ] and priest of '']'' ("God most high") mentioned in the 14th chapter of the ]. He brings out bread and wine and blesses ] and El Elyon.<ref>{{bibleverse||Genesis|14:18–20|HE}}</ref>


In the ], '''Melchizedek'''{{efn|{{IPAc-en|m|ɛ|l|ˈ|k|ɪ|z|ə|d|ɛ|k}};<ref>English pronunciation according to the (churchofjesuschrist.org; retrieved 2012-02-25), ]-ified from «mĕl-kĭz'a-dĭk»</ref> {{langx|hbo|{{Script/Hebrew|מַלְכִּי־צֶדֶק}}|translit=malkī-ṣeḏeq}}, 'king of righteousness,' 'my king is righteousness,' or 'my king is ]'<ref name="Cargill" />; also transliterated '''Melchisedech''', '''Melchisedec''', '''Malkisedek''' or '''Malki Tzedek'''}} was the king of ] and priest of {{transliteration|hbo|]}} (often translated as 'most high God'). He is first mentioned in Genesis 14:18–20,<ref>{{bibleverse|Genesis|14:18–20|HE}}</ref> where he brings out bread and wine and then blesses ], and El Elyon or "the Lord, God Most High". Abram was returning from pursuing the kings who came from the East and gave him a "]".
]ic literature – specifically ], ], and the ] – presents the name ({{lang|he|מלכי־צדק)}} as a ] title for ], the son of ].<ref>] and ] to Bereishith 14:18–20. ] to tractate Nedarim 32b et al.</ref>


In ], according to the ], ] is identified as "a priest forever in the order of Melchizedek", and so Jesus assumes the role of ] once and for all. In ], according to the ], ] Christ is identified as "High priest forever in the order of Melchizedek", and so Jesus assumes the role of ] once and for all. ]ic literature – specifically ], ], and the ] – presents his name ({{lang|hbo|{{Script|Hebrew|מלכי־צדק}}|rtl=yes}}) as a ] for ].<ref>] and ] to Bereishith 14:18–20. ] to tractate Nedarim 32b et al.</ref>

] has suggested that the story of Melchizedek is an informal insertion into the Genesis narration, possibly inserted in order to give validity to the priesthood and titles connected with the ]. It has also been conjectured that the suffix "-]" may have been or become a reference to a ] deity worshipped in ] Jerusalem.<ref name="Blenkinsopp" />{{rp|56–60}}


==Name== ==Name==
In the majority of ] ] the name is written as two words, ''{{lang|he-Latn|Meleḵi-ṣedeq}}'' {{lang|he|מלכי־צדק}},<ref>'''' to genesis (bereishith) 14:18–20</ref> rendered in one word in both the ] ({{lang|grc|Μελχισεδέκ}}) and ] (''{{lang|la|Melchisedech}}''). The ] of 1611 renders the name ''Melchizedek'' when translating from the Hebrew, and ''Melchisedec'' in the New Testament. In the majority of ] ] the name is written as two words, {{transliteration|hbo|Malki-ṣedeq}} {{lang|hbo|{{Script|Hebrew|מלכי־צדק}}|rtl=yes}}, rendered in one word in both the ] ({{lang|grc|{{Script|Greek|Μελχισεδέκ}}}}) and ] ({{lang|la|Melchisedech}}). The ] of 1611 renders the name "Melchizedek" when translating from the Hebrew, and "Melchisedec" in the New Testament.


The name is composed from the two elements: {{transliteration|hbo|]}}, 'king', and {{transliteration|hbo|]}}, which means either 'righteousness'<ref>'']'' no. 4428 and 6666.</ref> or the proper name ].<ref name=Toorn>{{cite book|author=van der Toorn, K.|display-authors=etal|title=''Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible''|publisher=Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing|year=1996|page=560}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last1=Masson |first1=Olivier |title=Recherches sur les Phéniciens à Chypre |last2=Sznycer |first2=Maurice |publisher=Librairie Droz |year=1972 |pages=99 |translator-link=Olivier Masson |translator-link2=Maurice Sznycer}}</ref> With the addition of the {{transliteration|hbo|]}} compaginis (]) indicating the archaic construct form, {{transliteration|hbo|malk-ī}} means 'king of', so that the name literally translates to 'king of righteousness'<ref>, written by Francis Brown, Samuel Rolles Driver and Charles Augustus Briggs, based on the Hebrew lexicon of Wilhelm Gesenius as translated by Edward Robinson, Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1906, p. 575.</ref> or 'my king is Zedek',<ref name=Toorn /> indicating that he worshipped ], a ] worshipped in pre-Israelite Jerusalem.<ref name=Blenkinsopp />{{rp|58}} The latter, however, is often dismissed since Hebrews 7:2 gives the translation of the name Melchizedek as "king of righteousness", although Robert R. Cargill has recently argued in favour of that etymology.<ref name="Cargill">{{cite book |title=Melchizedek, King of Sodom: How Scribes Invented the Biblical Priest-King |last=Cargill |first=Robert R. |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2019 |isbn=978-0-19-094696-8 |pages=12–14 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3ZugDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA12}}</ref> Mainstream scholarly understanding of these names ("My King is Righteousness" and "My Lord is Righteousness" respectively) is that they refer to the concept of righteousness and not to a god.<ref>Geoffrey W. Bromiley ed., The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1994, entries Melchizedek, Adoni-zedek</ref>
The name is composed from the two elements '']'' "king" and '']'' "righteous(ness)".<ref>'']'' no. 4428 and 6666.</ref> With the addition of the enclitic possessive pronoun ('']''), ''malk-ī'' means "my king", so that the name literally translates to "my king is righteousness" (or "my king is '']''").<ref>
"Melchizedek is an old Canaanite name meaning 'My King is Sedek' or 'My King is Righteousness'"
"Melchizedek" in ''Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of World Religions'' (1999), .
"Because the Hebrew ''malkiʾ'' includes a pronominal suffix in the first person singular, the name literally means 'my king is righteous,' or if the latter part of the name referred to a Canaanite God, 'my king is Zedek.'"
Daniel J. Harrington, ''Hebrews'', Liturgical Press, 2007, .
</ref>
By the Hellenistic era it appears the name came to be associated with the ] and paraphrased as "king of righteousness".<ref>"Originally the name probably meant 'my king is righteous' or 'my king is ''Zedek'',' but the author reads it as one might normally read what is called a Hebrew construct state, 'king of rightoeousness.'"
W. C. Kaiser et al., ''Hard Sayings of the Bible'', InterVarsity Press, 2009, .</ref>


The name is formed in parallel with {{transliteration|hbo|]}} {{lang|hbo|{{Script|Hebrew|אדני־צדק}}|rtl=yes}}, also a king of Salem, mentioned in Joshua 10:1–3,<ref>{{bibleverse|Joshua|10:1–3|HE}}</ref> where the element {{transliteration|hbo|malik}} ('king') is replaced by {{transliteration|hbo|]}} ('lord').{{efn|], {{transliteration|he|Bereishith}} chapter 14, opines that the name implies "my king is {{transliteration|hbo|tzedek}}", based on the notion that the city of Salem is associated with the attribute of righteousness.}} Parallel ]s, with Sedeq replaced by ], are those of ] and ], both biblical characters placed in the time of ].<ref> at Google Books</ref>
"My King is Righteousness" is interpreted as a ] associating Melchizedek's god, ''El Elyon'' with the epithet '']'' ("Righteousness"), which is otherwise attested as the name of ].<ref>{{cite journal| last=Delcor | first=M | title=Melchizedek from Genesis to the Qumran Texts and the Epistle to the Hebrews |journal= Journal for the Study of Judaism 2 |year=1971| pages= 115–35, esp. 115–6}}</ref>
Thus, ''Ṣedeq'' and ''El Elyon'' ("God most high") may have been two epithets of the same ] god, identified as an astral deity, perhaps eponymous of ] itself: ''Salim'' or ''Shalem'' (]) is attested as a god, presumably identified with the ], in ]; <sup>URU</sup>''Šalim'' in this case would be the city of Salim, the Jebusite astral deity.<ref>], s.v. "Elyon", "Shalem".</ref> The theonym is also preserved in Phoenician ('']''; ]: Συδυκ), a deity identified with Roman ].<ref>'']'' "Zedek" being an ancient name of Jerusalem (probably connected with the Phoenician Συδυκ <!--Συδυκ in print, Συδνκ is merely an OCR error in the online edition and not the fault of the editors of the 1906 source we cite here--> = 'Zedek' = 'Jupiter'; comp. Shab. 156a, b; Gen. R. xliii.; Pesiḳ. R. 20; see Baudissin, 'Studien zur Semitischen Religionsgesch.' 1876, i. 14–5)."</ref>

The name is formed in parallel with ''{{lang|he-Latn|]}}'' {{lang|he|אדני־צדק}}, also a king of Salem, mentioned in the ] (10:1–3), where the element ''malik'' "king" is replaced by '']'' "lord".<ref>], bereishith chap. 14, opines that the name implies "my king is ''tzedek''", based on the notion that the city of Salem is associated with the attribute of righteousness.</ref>
Parallel theophoric names, with Sedeq replaced by ], are those of ] and ], both biblical characters placed in the time of ].<ref> at Google Books</ref>

] alludes to Melchizedek as a prototype of the ]. This led to the re-interpretation of the name as "king of righteousness" in ].<ref>"Melchizedek" in ''Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of World Religions'' (1999), .</ref>
Based on evidence found in the ], it was also used as a name of the ], interpreted as a heavenly priest; Michael as ''Melchi-zedek'' contrast with ], who is given the name of ''Melchi-resha'' "king of wickedness".<ref>{{cite book |first=Birger A. |last=Pearson |title=Biblical Figures Outside the Bible |chapter=Melchizedek in Early Judaism, Christianity and Gnosticism |url=https://books.google.com/?id=eXM1YwCGipMC&printsec=frontcover#PPA182,M1|page=181|editor1-first=Michael E. |editor1-last=Stone| editor2-first=Theodore A. |editor2-last=Bergren |isbn=978-1-56338-411-0 |year=2003}}
Gareth Lee Cockerill, ''The Epistle to the Hebrews'', vol. 29 of The New International Commentary on the New Testament
Author, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2012, (fn. 14).</ref>
The text of the ] follows this interpretation in stating explicitly that the name in Greek translation (ἑρμηνευόμενος) means βασιλεὺς δικαιοσύνης ("king of righteousness"), omitting translation of the possessive suffix; the same passage interprets Melchizedek's title of king of Salem as translating to βασιλεὺς εἰρήνης "king of peace", the context being the presentation of Melchizedek's as an eternal priesthood associated with Jesus Christ (ἀφωμοιωμένος δὲ τῷ υἱῷ τοῦ θεοῦ μένει ἱερεὺς εἰς τὸ διηνεκές "made like unto the ] abideth a priest continually").<ref>Willard M. Swartley, ''Covenant of Peace'', Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2006, .
Gary Staats, ''A Christological Commentary on Hebrews'' (2012), : " is identifying Melchizedek as a king of righteousness and a king of peace. He thus becomes a beautiful type of Jesus Christ who is also the final King of righteousness and the final King of peace."
</ref>


==Hebrew Bible== ==Hebrew Bible==
Melchizedek is mentioned twice in the Hebrew Bible, the first in ] and the second in ].


===Genesis 14=== ===Genesis 14===
The narrative of Genesis 14 is part of the larger story telling how ] returns from defeating king ] and meets with ] the king of ],<ref>{{bibleverse||Genesis|14:1724|HE}} see below</ref> at which point: The narrative of Genesis 14 is part of the larger story telling how ] returns from defeating king ] and meets with ] the king of ],<ref>{{bibleverse|Genesis|14:17–24|HE}} see below</ref> at which point:
{{Quote|And Melchizedek king of Salem brought out bread and wine: and he was the priest of the most high God. And he blessed him, and said, 'Blessed be Abram to the most high God, possessor of heaven and earth, And blessed be the most high God, which hath delivered thine enemies into thy hand'. And he gave him tithe from all.|] 14:18–20}} {{Quote|And Melchizedek king of Salem brought out bread and wine: and he was the priest of the most high God. And he blessed him, and said, 'Blessed be Abram to the most high God, possessor of heaven and earth, And blessed be the most high God, which hath delivered thine enemies into thy hand'. And he gave him tithe from all.|] 14:18–20, ]<ref>{{bibleverse|Genesis|14:18–20|KJV}}</ref>}}


Some textual critics classify the narration as not being derived from any of the usual ] sources.<ref>Speiser, E. A. "Genesis. Introduction, translation, and notes" (AB 1; Garden City 1964) p. 105; Von Rad, "Genesis", pp. 170, 174; Noth, Martin. "A History of Pentateuchal Traditions" (Englewood Cliffs 1972) p. 28, n. 84.</ref> It has been speculated that verses 18–20 (in which Melchizedek appears) are an informal insertion into the narration, as they interrupt the account of the meeting of Abraham with the king of Sodom.<ref>Gunkel, Hermann. ''Genesis'' (Göttingen 1922) pp. 284–5</ref> Some textual critics classify the narration as not being derived from any of the usual ] sources.<ref>Speiser, E. A. "Genesis. Introduction, translation, and notes" (AB 1; Garden City 1964) p. 105; Von Rad, "Genesis", pp. 170, 174; Noth, Martin. "A History of Pentateuchal Traditions" (Englewood Cliffs 1972) p. 28, n. 84.</ref> It has been speculated that verses 18–20 (in which Melchizedek appears) are an informal insertion into the narration, as they interrupt the account of the meeting of Abraham with the king of Sodom.<ref>Gunkel, Hermann. ''Genesis'' (Göttingen 1922) pp. 284–5</ref><ref name=Blenkinsopp>{{cite book|last=Blenkinsopp|first=Joseph|title=Abraham: The Story of a Life|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=i3Z3BwAAQBAJ&pg=PA56|year=2015|publisher=Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing|isbn=978-0-8028-7287-6|page=56}}</ref>{{rp|56}} There is no consensus on when or why the story might have been added. It may have been inserted in order to give validity to the priesthood and tithes connected with the ].<ref name=Blenkinsopp />{{rp|59–60}} It also may have been inserted to give validity to the superiority of the ] priests over the ] priests.<ref>{{cite book|title=Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of World Religions|year = 1999|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZP_f9icf2roC|page=708|publisher=Encyclopaedia Britannica Publishers, Inc. Staff|isbn = 9780877790440}}</ref>


Lebanese Protestant scholar ] (1929–2011) observes that {{Hebrew Name 1|ֹמַעֲשֵׂר|m'sr||nobold}}, which literally does mean ''tenth'', might more loosely be used to mean ''portion'', and {{Hebrew Name 1|מִכֹּל|m-kl||nobold}}, or ''from all'', might refer just to food in the giver's possession, so that the whole verse might mean ''He gave him a portion of food.''.<ref name=Salibi>], ''The Bible Came from Arabia'' Jonathan Cape, 1985, chapter 12</ref> Lebanese Protestant scholar ] (1929–2011) observes that {{Hebrew Name 1|{{Script|Hebrew|ֹמַעֲשֵׂר}}|m'sr||nobold}}, which literally does mean 'tenth', might more loosely be used to mean 'portion', and {{Hebrew Name 1|{{Script|Hebrew|מִכֹּל}}|m-kl||nobold}}, or 'from all', might refer just to food in the giver's possession, so that the whole verse might mean "He gave him a portion of food".<ref name=Salibi>], ''The Bible Came from Arabia'' Jonathan Cape, 1985, chapter 12</ref>


Genesis 14:18 introduces Melchizedek a "Priest of the Most High God" (''El Elyon''), a term which is re-used in 14:19, 20, 22. The term "Most High" is used another twenty times of the God of the Israel in the Psalms. ] (1944) suspects that this is a late development,<ref>Della Vida, G. Levi. "El Elyon in Genesis 14:18–20", JBL 63 (1944) pp. 1–9</ref> and ] (1962) connects Genesis 14 with the mention of a god called "]," who may appear according to one of three possible translations of a 750 BC inscription found at ] in Syria.<ref>Fitzmyer, J. A. ''The Aramaic Inscriptions of Sefire'', Revised Edition (Bibor 19A; Rome 1995) pp. 41, 75</ref> Remi Lack (1962) considers that the Genesis verses were taken over by Jewish redactor(s), for whom El was already identified with YHWH, El-Elyon became an epithet for the God of Israel.<ref>Lack, R. "Les origines de Elyon, le Très-Haut, dans la tradition cultuelle d’Israel", ] 24 (1962) pp. 44–64</ref> Genesis 14:18<ref>{{bibleverse|Genesis|14:18|HE}}</ref> introduces Melchizedek, a "Priest of the Most High God" ({{transliteration|hbo|El Elyon}}), a term which is re-used in Genesis 14:19–20<ref>{{bibleverse|Genesis|14:19–20|HE}}</ref> and Genesis 14:22.<ref>{{bibleverse|Genesis|14:22|HE}}</ref> The term "Most High" is used another twenty times to refer to the God of Israel in the Psalms. ] (1944) suspects that this is a late development,<ref>Della Vida, G. Levi. "El Elyon in Genesis 14:18–20", JBL 63 (1944) pp. 1–9</ref> and ] (1962) connects Genesis 14 with the mention of a god called "]," who may appear according to one of three possible translations of a 750 BC inscription found at ] in Syria.<ref>Fitzmyer, J. A. ''The Aramaic Inscriptions of Sefire'', Revised Edition (Bibor 19A; Rome 1995) pp. 41, 75</ref> Remi Lack (1962) considers that the Genesis verses were taken over by Jewish redactor(s), for whom El was already identified with YHWH, ''El-Elyon'' became an epithet for the God of Israel.<ref>Lack, R. "Les origines de Elyon, le Très-Haut, dans la tradition cultuelle d’Israel", ] 24 (1962) pp. 44–64</ref>


====Tithe recipient==== ====Tithe recipient====
Due to an ambiguity in the Hebrew text, it is unclear who gave tithe to whom: Abram to Melchizedek, or Melchizedek to Abram: the verse in question states simply, "And gave him tithe from all" ({{transliteration|hbo|v-yiten-lo ma'aser mekol}}, {{lang|hbo|{{Script|Hebrew|ויתן לו מעשר מכל}}|rtl=yes}}). Most translations of this verse preserve the ambiguity, "he gave to him", but some modern translations make explicit the mainstream interpretation of Abram being the giver and Melchizedek the recipient.<ref>{{cite book|last=Alter|first=Robert|title=The Five Books of Moses|year=2004|publisher=W. W. Norton & Co.|isbn=0-393-01955-1|page=|quote=Employment of the verb without a subject, not uncommon in biblical usage, occurs at the end of verse 20, where the Hebrew does not state what the context implies, that it is Abram who gives the tithe.|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/fivebooksofmoses00alte/page/70}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=The Revised English Bible|url=https://archive.org/details/rebstandardediti00bibl|url-access=registration|year=1989|publisher=Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press|page=}}</ref>
Due to an ambiguity in the Hebrew text, it is unclear who gave tithe to whom: Abram to Melchizedek, or Melchizedek to Abram:
the verse in question states simply, "And gave him tithe from all" ({{lang|he|''v-yiten-lo ma'aser mekol'', ויתן לו מעשר מכל }}). Most translations of this verse preserve the ambiguity, as in the ], which has {{lang|grc|''edōken autōi'', ἔδωκεν αὐτῷ}} "he gave to him", but some modern translations make explicit the mainstream interpretation of Abram being the giver and Melchizedek the recipient.<ref>{{cite book|last=Alter|first=Robert|title=The Five Books of Moses|year=2004|publisher=W. W. Norton & Co.|isbn=0-393-01955-1|page=70|quote=Employment of a verb without a subject, not uncommon in biblical usage, occurs at the end of verse 20, where the Hebrew does not state what the context implies, that it is Abram who gives the tithe.}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=The Revised English Bible|year=1989|publisher=Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press|page=11}}</ref>


], the ], ], ], and ] all read Abram as the giver of the tithe to Melchizedek.<ref>{{cite book|last=Hayward|first=C. T. Robert|title=Targums and the transmission of scripture into Judaism and Christianity|year=2010|publisher=Koninklijke Brill NV|page=15|quote=Targum Pseudo-Jonathan makes it clear that Abraham paid tithes to Melchizedek, as does the interpretation adopted by Jub. 13.25–27; Josephus Ant. 1.181; Philo Cong. 93, 99; and, of course, the epistle to the Hebrews .}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Herczeg|first=Yisrael Isser Zvi|title=The Torah: With Rashi's Commentary Translated, Annotated, and Elucidated|year=1995|publisher=Mesorah Publications|page=140}}</ref> ], the ], ], ], and ] all read Abram as the giver of the tithe to Melchizedek.<ref>{{cite book|last=Hayward|first=C. T. Robert|title=Targums and the transmission of scripture into Judaism and Christianity|year=2010|publisher=Koninklijke Brill NV|page=15|quote=Targum Pseudo-Jonathan makes it clear that Abraham paid tithes to Melchizedek, as does the interpretation adopted by Jub. 13.25–27; Josephus Ant. 1.181; Philo Cong. 93, 99; and, of course, the epistle to the Hebrews .}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Herczeg|first=Yisrael Isser Zvi|title=The Torah: With Rashi's Commentary Translated, Annotated, and Elucidated|year=1995|publisher=Mesorah Publications|page=140}}</ref>
The ], also understanding Abram to be the tithe giver, comments that the presented tithe was not a standard tithe (]) as described in the ] (given on an annual basis), but was a one-time "tribute offering" (''trumat ha-mekhes'', תרומת המכס), such as Moses gave to God in Numbers 31:41.<ref>{{cite book|last=Rogatchover Gaon|title=Tzafnat Paaneach al HaTorah}} commentary on Gen. 14</ref> The ], also understanding Abram to be the tithe giver, comments that the presented tithe was not a standard tithe (]) as described in the ] (given on an annual basis), but was a one-time "tribute offering" ({{transliteration|hbo|trumat ha-mekhes}}, {{lang|hbo|{{Script|Hebrew|תרומת המכס}}|rtl=yes}}), such as Moses gave to God in Numbers 31:41.<ref>{{bibleverse|Numbers|31:41|HE}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Rogatchover Gaon|title=Tzafnat Paaneach al HaTorah}} commentary on Gen. 14</ref>


Expressing a ] point of view, the ] commentary to Genesis 14 cites ''Rabbi Yitzchak'' as saying that it was God who gave a tithe to Abram in the form of removing the Hebrew letter '']'' from his own throne of glory and presenting it to the soul of Abram for his benefit.<ref>] to Bereishit chap. 14 (the Zohar text, however, does not state that a name change to "Abra-ha-m" occurred at this point).</ref> Expressing a ] point of view, the ] commentary to Genesis 14 cites Rabbi Yitzchak as saying that it was God who gave a tithe to Abram in the form of removing the Hebrew letter {{transliteration|hbo|]}} from his own throne of glory and presenting it to the soul of Abram for his benefit.<ref>] to Bereishit chap. 14 (the Zohar text, however, does not state that a name change to "Abra-ha-m" occurred at this point).</ref>
Rabbi ] (1843–1926) interprets the phrase "And he gave him tithe from all" as a verbal continuation of Melchizedek's speech, i.e., Melchizedek exclaimed that God had chosen to gift Abram a tenth of God's possession of the entire human race (consisting of seventy nations as described in ]) in the form of the seven nations of the ], including the cities of Sodom that Abram succeeded in saving. Rabbi Meir Simcha argues that continued speech of this sort was a common form of prophetic expression.<ref>i.e. beginning in a form of talking to the person directly and ending the speech as speaking for the recipient – Meshech Chochma to Bereishit chap. 14</ref>


Rabbi ] (1843–1926) interprets the phrase "And he gave him tithe from all" as a verbal continuation of Melchizedek's speech, i.e., Melchizedek exclaimed that God had chosen to gift Abram a tenth of God's possession of the entire human race (consisting of seventy nations as described in ]) in the form of the seven nations of the ], including the cities of Sodom that Abram succeeded in saving. Rabbi Meir Simcha argues that continued speech of this sort was a common form of prophetic expression.{{efn|I.e., beginning in a form of talking to the person directly and ending the speech as speaking for the recipient – Meshech Chochma to Bereishit chapter 14.}}
====Samaritan Pentateuch====
{{refimprove section|date=July 2015}}


===Psalm 110===
The ] reads שלמו (lit. "his peace" or in contextual flow "allied with him") in place of the Masoretic שלם (]), with addition of a letter ו (]).
{{main article|Psalm 110}}
The second and final Hebrew Bible mention of Melchizedek is in ] 110:4.<ref>{{bibleverse|Psalm|110:4|HE}}</ref> The many translations that follow the Septuagint<ref>such as the Vulgate, KJV 1611, JPS 1917</ref> translate it as:


{{quote|The {{LORD}} hath sworn, and will not repent: 'Thou art a priest for ever
] views the Samaritan wording as authentic<ref name=albright>Albright reads ''melek shelomo'' (מלך-שלמו), "of his peace", instead of ''melek Salem'', "king of Jerusalem", brought out bread and wine..." Albright, W. F. "Abram the Hebrew: A New Archaeological Interpretation", ''BASOR'' 163 (1961) 36–54, esp. 52.</ref> as does the ''New American Bible''<ref name=NAB-Gen14></ref>
after the manner of Melchizedek.'| (])}}
Regardless of the residence of Malkizedek, Samaritan tradition identified a "Salem" as a place on the slopes of ] which served as a blessing place of the children of Israel upon their initial crossing of the Jordan river.{{Citation needed|date=January 2012}}
The ] allocate Gerizim (and not Jerusalem) as the site intended for the Temple, and thus the "שלמו" text serves an obvious sectarian purpose. Yet, it{{Clarify|date=January 2012}} is not solely associated with the Samaritans, being found also in the 3rd- or 2nd-century BC ] and even in the Septuagint version of Genesis.<ref></ref>


Although the above is the traditional translation of the text, the Hebrew text can be interpreted in various ways, and the ], (1985 edition), for example, has:
===Psalm 110===
{{main|Psalm 110}}
The second and final Hebrew Bible mention of Melchizedek is in ] {{bibleverse-nb||Psalm|110:4|HE}}.
The many translations that follow the Septuagint<ref>such as the Vulgate, KJV 1611, JPS 1917</ref> translate such;
<blockquote>The {{Sc|L|ORD}} hath sworn, and will not repent: 'Thou art a priest for ever
after the manner of Melchizedek.'. (JPS 1917)</blockquote>
Although the above is the traditional translation of the text, the Hebrew text can be interpreted in various ways, and the ], (1985 edition), for example, has:
<blockquote>You are a priest forever, a rightful king by My decree. (JPS 1985)</blockquote>
Another alternative keeps Melchizedek as a personal name but changes the identity of the person addressed: "You are a priest forever by my order (or 'on my account'), O Melchizedek" – here it is Melchizedek who is being addressed throughout the psalm.<ref>Kugel, James L. </ref>


{{quote|You are a priest forever, a rightful king by My decree.|JPS 1985)}}
The majority of ]ic literature attributes the primary character of the psalm as ]<ref>based on the text שב ל'''ימיני''' with "Yemini" referring either to ] of the ] (Bin'''yamin''') whom David was careful not to overthrow ''or'' to the ] (as per it being referred to as "from his right hand – a fire of religion to them" –Deuteronomy) – Targum Yonathan to Psalm 110</ref> who was a "righteous king" (מלכי צדק) of Salem (Jerusalem) and, like Melchizedek, had certain priest-like responsibilities, while the ] understands the chapter as referring to Abram who was victorious in battling to save his nephew Lot and merited priesthood.<ref>Babylonian Talmud to Nedarim, p. 32</ref> The Zohar defines the noted Melchizedek as referring to ] the ] (high priest).<ref>zohar vol. 3 p. 53b</ref>


Another alternative keeps Melchizedek as a personal name but changes the identity of the person addressed: "You are a priest forever by my order (or 'on my account'), O Melchizedek" – here it is Melchizedek who is being addressed throughout the psalm.<ref>Kugel, James L. </ref>
Psalm 110:4 is cited in the New Testament letter to the Hebrews as an indicator that Jesus, regarded in the letter as the Messiah, had a right to a priesthood pre-dating the Jewish Aaronic priesthood (Hebrews 5:5–6).

The majority of ]ic literature attributes the primary character of the psalm as ]{{efn|Based on the text {{lang|hbo|שב ל'''ימיני'''}} with "Yemini" referring either to ] of the ] ({{transliteration|hbo|Bin'''{{em|yamin}}'''}}) whom David was careful not to overthrow {{em|or}} to the ] (as per it being referred to as "from his right hand – a fire of religion to them" Deuteronomy)<ref>Targum Yonathan to Psalm 110</ref>}} who was a "righteous king" ({{lang|hbo|{{Script|Hebrew|מלכי צדק}}|rtl=yes}}) of Salem and, like Melchizedek, had certain priest-like responsibilities, while the ] understands the chapter as referring to Abram who was victorious in battling to save his nephew Lot and merited priesthood.<ref>Babylonian Talmud to Nedarim, p. 32</ref> The Zohar defines the noted Melchizedek as referring to ] the ] (high priest).<ref>zohar vol. 3 p. 53b</ref>

==Samaritan Pentateuch==
The ] reads {{lang|hbo|{{Script|Hebrew|שלמו}}|rtl=yes}} ({{lit|his peace}} or in contextual flow 'allied with him') in place of the Masoretic {{lang|hbo|{{Script|Hebrew|שלם}}|rtl=yes}} (]), with addition of a letter {{lang|hbo|{{Script|Hebrew|ו}}|rtl=yes}} ({{transliteration|hbo|]}}).

] views the Samaritan wording as authentic{{efn|Albright reads {{transliteration|hbo|melek shelomo}} ({{lang|hbo|מלך-שלמו}}), "of his peace", instead of {{transliteration|hbo|melek Salem}}, "king of Jerusalem", brought out bread and wine..."<ref>Albright, W. F. "Abram the Hebrew: A New Archaeological Interpretation", ''BASOR'' 163 (1961) 36–54, esp. 52.</ref>}} as does the ].<ref name=NAB-Gen14></ref>

Regarding the residence of Melchizedek, Samaritan tradition identified a "Salem" as a place on the slopes of ] which served as a blessing place of the children of Israel upon their initial crossing of the Jordan river.{{Citation needed|date=January 2012}} The ] allocate Gerizim (and not Jerusalem) as the site intended for the Temple, and thus the "{{lang|hbo|{{Script|Hebrew|שלמו}}|rtl=yes}}" text serves an obvious sectarian purpose. However, this practice is not solely associated with the Samaritans: the possessive suffix is also found in the 3rd- or 2nd-century BC ], and Greek possessive suffixes are even used in the ] version of Genesis.<ref></ref>

==New Testament==

With respect to Genesis 14:20, ] ] and ] in the ] state that the patriarch Abraham gave a tenth of the spoil to Melchizedek.

Psalm 110:4 is cited in the New Testament letter to the Hebrews as an indicator that Jesus, regarded in the letter as the Messiah, had a right to a priesthood pre-dating the Jewish Aaronic priesthood (Hebrews 5:5–6).<ref>{{bibleverse|Hebrews|5:5–6}}</ref>


==In Judaism== ==In Judaism==


===Hellenistic Judaism=== ===Hasmonean dynasty===
The ] recounts that ] rulers used to identify themselves as "High Priest of ]": "When the Hasmonean kingdom became strong and defeated the Greeks, they instituted that people should mention the name of Heaven even in their legal documents. And therefore they would write: In year such and such of ] of the God Most High."<ref>{{cite Talmud|b|Rosh Hashanah|18b|nobook=yes}}</ref> Scholars have observed that the Hasmoneans used Melchizedek's example of monarch-priest to justify occupying both offices.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Longenecker |first1=Richard N. |title=Studies in Hermeneutics, Christology and Discipleship |date=2004 |publisher=Sheffield Phoenix Press |isbn=978-1-905048-05-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8M4fCLIdjuEC&pg=PA191 |access-date=22 November 2024 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Bokedal |first1=Tomas |last2=Jansen |first2=Ludger |last3=Borowski |first3=Michael |title=Scripture and Theology: Historical and Systematic Perspectives |date=21 August 2023 |publisher=Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG |isbn=978-3-11-076841-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jlXPEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA77 |access-date=22 November 2024 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Walton |first1=John H. |title=The Lost World of Adam and Eve: Genesis 2-3 and the Human Origins Debate |date=23 February 2015 |publisher=InterVarsity Press |isbn=978-0-8308-9771-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UMnYBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA97 |access-date=23 November 2024 |language=en}}</ref>
] refers to Melchizedek as a "Canaanite chief" in ], but as a priest in ].

===Late Hellenistic Judaism===
] refers to Melchizedek as a "Canaanite chief" in '']'', but as a priest in '']''.


] identifies Melchizedek with the ] as priest of God,<ref>Jutta Leonhardt Jewish worship in Philo of Alexandria 2001 p216 "IIl 82 Philo also identifies Melchizedek with the Logos as priest of God. Thus Melchizedek, Although Philo interprets the Jewish first-fruit offering and quotes the Jewish laws, the general context is still Cain's sacrifice."</ref> and honoured as an untutored priesthood.<ref>Fred L. Horton The Melchizedek Tradition: A Critical Examination of the Sources 2005 p170 "In the Genesis Apocryphon Melchizedek is brought into connection with Jerusalem (as he is later in Josephus), and in Philo Melchizedek is honored as the possessor of an unlearned and untutored priesthood, indeed as a representation"</ref> ] identifies Melchizedek with the ] as priest of God,<ref>Jutta Leonhardt Jewish worship in Philo of Alexandria 2001 p216 "IIl 82 Philo also identifies Melchizedek with the Logos as priest of God. Thus Melchizedek, Although Philo interprets the Jewish first-fruit offering and quotes the Jewish laws, the general context is still Cain's sacrifice."</ref> and honoured as an untutored priesthood.<ref>Fred L. Horton The Melchizedek Tradition: A Critical Examination of the Sources 2005 p170 "In the Genesis Apocryphon Melchizedek is brought into connection with Jerusalem (as he is later in Josephus), and in Philo Melchizedek is honored as the possessor of an unlearned and untutored priesthood, indeed as a representation"</ref>


The ] (also called "Slavonic Enoch") is apparently a Jewish sectarian work of the 1st century AD.<ref>{{cite book|author=Harry Alan Hahne |title=Corruption and Redemption of Creation: the Natural World in Romans 8.19–22 and Jewish Apocalyptic Literature | isbn=0-567-03055-5 |year=2006| page= 83}}</ref> The last section of the work, the ], tells how Melchizedek was born of a virgin, Sofonim (or Sopanima), the wife of Nir, a brother of ]. The child came out from his mother after she had died and sat on the bed beside her corpse, already physically developed, clothed, speaking and blessing the Lord, and marked with the badge of priesthood. Forty days later, Melchizedek was taken by the archangel ] (] in some manuscripts) to the ] and was thus preserved from the ] without having to be in ].<ref></ref><ref>{{cite book| title=The Book of the Secrets of Enoch| author= Morfill, W R (translator)| url=http://www.scribd.com/doc/3678772/The-Book-of-the-Secrets-of-Enoch-WR-Morfill }}</ref> The ] (also called "Slavonic Enoch") is apparently a Jewish sectarian work of the 1st century AD.<ref>{{cite book|author=Harry Alan Hahne |title=Corruption and Redemption of Creation: the Natural World in Romans 8.19–22 and Jewish Apocalyptic Literature |isbn=0-567-03055-5 |year=2006 |page=83 |publisher=A&C Black}}</ref> The last section of the work, the ], tells how Melchizedek was born of a virgin, Sofonim (or Sopanima), the wife of Nir, a brother of ]. The child came out from his mother after she had died and sat on the bed beside her corpse, already physically developed, clothed, speaking and blessing the Lord, and marked with the badge of priesthood. Forty days later, Melchizedek was taken by the archangel ] (] in some manuscripts) to the ] and was thus preserved from the ] without having to be in ].<ref></ref><ref>{{cite book |title=The Book of the Secrets of Enoch |author=Morfill, W R |url=https://www.scribd.com/doc/3678772/The-Book-of-the-Secrets-of-Enoch-WR-Morfill}}</ref>

The '']'' is a short ] composed in Greek in the first three centuries AD, probably in a Jewish milieu. It survives today only in Christian recensions, but in at least ten languages.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Stephen Pelle |year=2013 |title=A Preliminary Study of the ''Historia de Melchisedech'' in the Latin West |journal=Apocrypha |volume=24 |pages=60–61 |doi=10.1484/j.apocra.1.103498}}</ref>


===Dead Sea Scrolls=== ===Dead Sea Scrolls===
] (11QMelch) is a fragment of a text, dated to the end of the second or start of the first century BC, about Melchizedek, found in ] at ] in the ] and part of the ]. Melchizedek is seen as a divine being in the text and is referred to as "El" or "]", titles usually reserved for God.<ref name="hs2010">{{cite web | last=Sumner | first=Paul | title=Melchizedek: Angel, Man or Messiah? | website=Hebrew Streams | date=February 25, 2010 | url=http://www.hebrew-streams.org/works/qumran/melchizedek-dss.html | access-date=September 9, 2020}}</ref> According to the text, Melchizedek will proclaim the "Day of ]" and he will atone for the people who are predestined to him. He also will judge the peoples.<ref>{{cite book|author=Wise, Abegg, Cook |year=1996 |title=The Dead Sea Scrolls: a New Translation|url=https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780060692001 |url-access=registration }}</ref>

] (11QMelch) is a fragment (that can be dated to the end of the 2nd or start of the 1st century BC) of a text about Melchizedek found in Cave 11 at ] in the Israeli Dead Sea area and which comprises part of the ]. In this ] text, Melchizedek is seen as a divine being and Hebrew titles as ] are applied to him. According to this text Melchizedek will proclaim the "Day of ]" and he will atone for the people who are predestined to him. He also will judge the peoples.<ref>{{cite book|author=Wise, Abegg, Cook |year=1996 |title=The Dead Sea Scrolls: a New Translation}}</ref>


The ] (1QapGen) repeats information from Genesis.<ref>The Melchizedek Tradition: A Critical Examination of the Sources p. 85 Fred L. Horton – 2005 "Interestingly enough, we see that the Genesis Apocryphon offers no unique information about Melchizedek. Josephus gives three items of information not found in the other sources, and Philo four."</ref> The ] (1QapGen) repeats information from Genesis.<ref>The Melchizedek Tradition: A Critical Examination of the Sources p. 85 Fred L. Horton – 2005 "Interestingly enough, we see that the Genesis Apocryphon offers no unique information about Melchizedek. Josephus gives three items of information not found in the other sources, and Philo four."</ref>

The ], also indicate that Melchizedek was used as a name of the ], interpreted as a heavenly priest; Michael as {{transliteration|hbo|Melchi-zedek}} contrast with ], who is given the name of {{transliteration|hbo|Melchi-resha}} 'king of wickedness'.<ref>{{cite book |first=Birger A. |last=Pearson |title=Biblical Figures Outside the Bible |chapter=Melchizedek in Early Judaism, Christianity and Gnosticism |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eXM1YwCGipMC|page=181|editor1-first=Michael E. |editor1-last=Stone| editor2-first=Theodore A. |editor2-last=Bergren |isbn=978-1-56338-411-0 |year=2003|publisher=A&C Black }}</ref><ref>Gareth Lee Cockerill, ''The Epistle to the Hebrews'', vol. 29 of The New International Commentary on the New Testament Author, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2012, (fn. 14).</ref> The text of the ] follows this interpretation in stating explicitly that the name in Greek translation ({{lang|grc|{{Script|Greek|ἑρμηνευόμενος}}}}) means {{lang|grc|{{Script|Greek|βασιλεὺς δικαιοσύνης}}}} ('king of righteousness'), omitting translation of the possessive suffix; the same passage interprets Melchizedek's title of king of Salem as translating to {{lang|grc|{{Script|Greek|βασιλεὺς εἰρήνης}}}} 'king of peace', the context being the presentation of Melchizedek's as an eternal priesthood associated with Jesus Christ ({{lang|grc|{{Script|Greek|ἀφωμοιωμένος δὲ τῷ υἱῷ τοῦ θεοῦ μένει ἱερεὺς εἰς τὸ διηνεκές}}}}, 'made like unto the ] abideth a priest continually').<ref>Willard M. Swartley, ''Covenant of Peace'', Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2006, .
Gary Staats, ''A Christological Commentary on Hebrews'' (2012), : " is identifying Melchizedek as a king of righteousness and a king of peace. He thus becomes a beautiful type of Jesus Christ who is also the final King of righteousness and the final King of peace."
</ref>


===Torah commentaries=== ===Torah commentaries===
Hebrew-language ] of the ] era (11th to 15th centuries) have explained the (seemingly) abrupt intrusion of Melchizedek into the narration in various ways; ] ({{c.|1250}}) points out that the following verses have Abraham refusing any of the king of Sodom's possessions<ref>"if from a string and until a shoe string" – Bereishith 14:23</ref> which, if not for the insertion of Melchizedek's hospitality, would prompt the query as to where Abraham and his weary men got their refreshments from.<ref>Chizkuni to Bereishith 14:18</ref> The Rashbam, ] (11th century), offers a similar explanation but varies by saying that only Abram's men partook in the booty (originally belonging to the king of Sodom)<ref>{{bibleverse|Genesis|14:21-24|HE}}</ref> whereas the Melchizedek intrusion explains that Abram himself was sustained by Melchizedek since he refused to consume of the luxury of Sodom because his Lord was of the non-material world.<ref>Rashbam to Bereishith 1418</ref> Likewise, the commentary of ] (17th century) offers a three-pronged slew of reasons for the Melchizedek insertion.<ref>see ohr hachayim to Bereishit 14:18</ref>

Hebrew language ] of the ] era (11th to 15th centuries) have explained the (seemingly) abrupt intrusion of Melchizedek into the narration in various ways; ] (c. 1250) points out that the following verses has Abram refusing any of the king of Sodom's possessions<ref>"if from a string and until a shoe string" – Bereishith 14:23</ref> which, if not for the insertion of Melchizedek's hospitality, would prompt the query as to where Abram and his weary men got their refreshments from.<ref>Chizkuni to Bereishith 14:18</ref> The Rashbam, ] (11th century), offers a similar explanation but varies by saying that only Abram's men partook in the booty (originally belonging to the king of Sodom)<ref>as the later verse reads "aside..for what the young men consumed" – Bereishith 14:24</ref> whereas the Melchizedek intrusion explains that Abram himself was sustained by Melchizedek since he refused to consume of the luxury of Sodom because his Lord was of the non-material world.<ref>Rashbam to Bereishith 1418</ref> Likewise, the commentary of ] (17th century) offers a three-pronged slew of reasons for the Melchizedek insertion.<ref>see ohr hachayim to Bereishit 14:18</ref>


===In rabbinic literature=== ===In rabbinic literature===
The narrative preceding Melchizedek's introduction presents a picture of Melchizedek's involvement in the events of his era. The narration details Abram's rescue of his nephew ] and his spectacular defeat of multiple kings, and goes on to define the meeting place of Melchizedek and Abram as "''Emek HaShaveh'' which is ''Emek HaMelech''". The meeting site has been associated with ''Emek Yehoshaphat'' (the ]).<ref>] to ]4:22</ref> ] describes the meeting location's size as "a plot the size of a king's ''Riis''".<ref>understood by Rashi as 30 ''Kanns''. Of note is the ], who demonstrates that the '''king's riis''' is inclusive of the demarcating boundary as part and parcel of the said boundary – Tzafnath Paaneach to Bereishith 14</ref> ]ic exegesis describes how a large group of governors and kings convened in unison to pay homage to the victor Abram and desired to make him a ], at which point he declined, attributing his victory to God's might and will alone.<ref>] to genesis 14:17, quoting ''medrash aggadah''authored by '']''. Medrash Rabbah</ref> The narrative preceding Melchizedek's introduction presents a picture of Melchizedek's involvement in the events of his era. The narration details Abram's rescue of his nephew ] and his spectacular defeat of multiple kings and goes on to define the meeting place of Melchizedek and Abram as "{{transliteration|hbo|Emek HaShaveh}} which is {{transliteration|hbo|Emek HaMelech}}". The meeting site has been associated with {{transliteration|hbo|Emek Yehoshaphat}} (the ]).<ref>] to ] 4:22</ref> ] describes the meeting location's size as "a plot the size of a king's {{transliteration|hbo|Riis}}". ]ic exegesis describes how a large group of governors and kings convened in unison to pay homage to the victor Abram and desired to make him a ], at which point he declined, attributing his victory to God's might and will alone.<ref>] to genesis 14:17, quoting ''medrash aggadah''authored by '']''. Medrash Rabbah</ref>


The chronological work '']'' (published 1769) quotes that Melchizedek was the first to initiate and complete a wall in circumference of the city,<ref name="seder hadoroth p. 9b">seder hadoroth p. 9b.</ref> and had to exit Salem to reach Abram and his men. Upon exiting Salem, he presented to them "bread and wine" with the intent to refresh them from their journey.<ref>] to genesis chap. 14</ref> Following the premise that Melchizedek was indeed ], he was 465 years old at the time and Abram was 75 years of age.<ref name="seder hadoroth p. 9b"/> The chronological work {{transliteration|he|]}} (published 1769) quotes that Melchizedek was the first to initiate and complete a wall in circumference of the city,<ref name="seder hadoroth p. 9b">seder hadoroth p. 9b.</ref> and had to exit Salem to reach Abram and his men. Upon exiting Salem, he presented to them "bread and wine" with the intent to refresh them from their journey.<ref>] to genesis chap. 14</ref> Assuming the premise that Melchizedek was ], he would have been 465 years old at the time and Abram was 75 years of age.<ref name="seder hadoroth p. 9b"/>


]ic literature unanimously identify Melchizedek as ] son of ] (] to Genesis chap. 14, ]h 46:7, ] to Tractate Nedarim 32b). The ] attributes him (Shem and his ] court of justice) as pioneers in banning prostitution (Avodah Zarah p.&nbsp;36a). ]ic literature unanimously identify Melchizedek as Shem son of ] (] to Genesis chapter 14, ]h 46:7, ] to Tractate Nedarim 32b). The ] attributes him (Shem and his ] court of justice) as pioneers in banning prostitution (Avodah Zarah p.{{nbsp}}36a).


] governed by ]]] ] governed by ]]]
There is, however, disagreement amongst ] as to whether '''Salem''' was Melchizedek/Shem's allocated residence by his father Noah or whether he was a foreigner in Salem which was considered the rightful land of his brother ]. The ] is of the opinion that the land was rightfully owned and governed by the offspring of ], and explains that Melchizedek/Shem left his home country and came to Salem as a foreigner wishing to serve God as a ''Kohen''.<ref>] to Bereishith 14:18</ref> However, ] maintains that the land of Canaan was initially allotted to Shem, by Noah his father, and the offspring of Cham conquered the land by forced expansion.<ref>Rashi (based on ]) to Bereishith 12:6</ref> There is, however, disagreement amongst ] as to whether Salem was Melchizedek/Shem's allocated residence by his father Noah or whether he was a foreigner in Salem which was considered the rightful land of his brother ]. The ] is of the opinion that the land was rightfully owned and governed by the offspring of ], and explains that Melchizedek/Shem left his home country and came to Salem as a foreigner wishing to serve God as a {{transliteration|hbo|Kohen}}.<ref>] to Bereishith 14:18</ref> However, ] maintains that the land of Canaan was initially allotted to Shem, by Noah his father, and the offspring of Cham conquered the land by forced expansion.<ref>Rashi (based on ]) to Bereishith 12:6</ref>


====Transition of the Priesthood==== ====Transition of the Priesthood====
{{main|Brith HaKehuna}} {{Main|Brith HaKehuna}}
Although Melchizedek is the first person in the ] to be titled a ] (priest), the ] records that he was preceded in priesthood ({{transliteration|hbo|kehuna}}) by ].<ref>introduction to (])</ref> ] to the Torah explain that Melchizedek – (sometimes associated with Shem) – was given the priesthood (Hebrew: {{transliteration|hbo|kehuna}}) by receipt of his father Noah's blessing "G-d beatified ]h and ''will dwell in the house of Shem''";<ref>Genesis 9:27</ref> i.e., he will merit to serve and host God as a {{transliteration|hbo|Kohen}}.<ref>Maharzav (Rabbi Zev Wolf Einhorn; ?–1862; Lithuania), to Leviticus Rabbah 25:6</ref>

Although Melchizedek is the first person in the ] to be titled a ] (priest), the ] records that he was preceded in priesthood (kehuna) by ].<ref>introduction to (])</ref> ] to the Torah explain that Melchizedek – essentially ] – was given the priesthood (Hebrew; ''kehuna'') by receipt of his father Noah's blessing "G-d beatified ]h and '''will dwell in the house of Shem'''";<ref>Genesis 9:27</ref> i.e., he will merit to serve and host God as a ''Kohen''.<ref>Maharzav (Rabbi Zev Wolf Einhorn; ?–1862; Lithuania), to Leviticus Rabbah 25:6</ref>


] require that the ] (priest) must be a patrilineal descendant of a prior Kohen.<ref>Bamidbar 18:7. The ] to Leviticus reasons that since the kohen father of the household naturally instills in his children the duties of Kehuna from birth and onward making them successful at their Kohanic duties</ref> ] maintains that God intended to ''permanently'' bring forth the priesthood ("Kehuna") through Melchizedek’s patrilineal descendants, but since Melchizedek ''preceded'' Abram's blessing to that of God,<ref>In {{Bibleverse||Gen.|14:19–20|HE}}, a precedence not befitting a ''kohen'' who is to be of total service to God – ''Eitz Yosef'' to Leviticu Rabbah 25:6.</ref> God instead chose to bring the priesthood ("kehuna") forth from Abram’s descendants.<ref>Rabbi Zechariah, quoting ]; Leviticus Rabbah 25:6, Babylonian Talmud to Nedarim 32b. Zohar vol. 1 p. 86b.</ref> As the text states in regard to Melchizedek; "and '''he is''' a Kohen",<ref>in Hebrew; "והוא כהן" – Genesis 14</ref> meaning himself in the exclusive sense and not his patrilineal descendants.<ref>] (Rabbi Chaim ben Attar 1696–1742, Morocco) to Genesis 14:18 (first explanation). ''Eitz Yosef'' commentary to Leviticus Rabbah 25:6. ] vol. 1 p. 86b</ref> ] require that the {{transliteration|he|]}} (priest) must be a patrilineal descendant of a prior {{transliteration|he|Kohen}}.<ref>Bamidbar 18:7. The ] to Leviticus reasons that since the kohen father of the household naturally instills in his children the duties of Kehuna from birth and onward making them successful at their Kohanic duties</ref> ] maintains that God intended to {{em|permanently}} bring forth the priesthood ({{transliteration|hbo|Kehuna}}) through Melchizedek's patrilineal descendants, but since Melchizedek {{em|preceded}} Abram's blessing to that of God,<ref>In {{Bibleverse|Genesis|14:19–20|HE}}, a precedence not befitting a ''kohen'' who is to be of total service to God – ''Eitz Yosef'' to Leviticu Rabbah 25:6.</ref> God instead chose to bring the priesthood ({{transliteration|hbo|kehuna}}) forth from Abram's descendants.<ref>Rabbi Zechariah, quoting ]; Leviticus Rabbah 25:6, Babylonian Talmud to Nedarim 32b. Zohar vol. 1 p. 86b.</ref> As the text states in regard to Melchizedek; "and ''he is a Kohen" ({{lang|hbo|{{Script|Hebrew|והוא כהן}}|rtl=yes}}) meaning himself in the exclusive sense and not his patrilineal descendants.<ref>] (Rabbi Chaim ben Attar 1696–1742, Morocco) to Genesis 14:18 (first explanation). ''Eitz Yosef'' commentary to Leviticus Rabbah 25:6. ] vol. 1 p. 86b</ref>''


The ] commentary presents that God was not angered by Melchizedek's preceding Abram's blessing to that of God, since Abram was rightfully deemed worthy of precedence for independently coming to recognize God amidst a world of ], but Melchizedek ''willingly'' gave the priesthood to Abram upon recognizing his outstanding uniqueness and Godly character traits.<ref>Ohr HaChaim to Bereishith 14:18</ref> The ] commentary presents that God was not angered by Melchizedek's preceding Abram's blessing to that of God, since Abram was rightfully deemed worthy of precedence for independently coming to recognize God amidst a world of ], but Melchizedek {{em|willingly}} gave the priesthood to Abram upon recognizing his outstanding uniqueness and godly character traits.<ref>Ohr HaChaim to Bereishith 14:18</ref>


Rabbinic authorities defer as to whether Kehuna was given to Abram there and then<ref>Maharzav (Z. V. Einhorn) to Leviticus Rabbah 25:6 (since Abraham's demise preceded Shem's by 35 years)</ref> or after the demise of Melchizedek.<ref>this latter opinion being of the ''Eitz Yosef'' commentary to ] 25:6</ref> Rabbinic authorities differ as to whether {{transliteration|hbo|kehuna}} was given to Abram there and then<ref>Maharzav (Z. V. Einhorn) to Leviticus Rabbah 25:6 (since Abraham's demise preceded Shem's by 35 years)</ref> or after the demise of Melchizedek.<ref>This latter opinion being of the ''Eitz Yosef'' commentary to ] 25:6</ref>


The Midrash records that Shem functioned as ] (high priest) in that he taught ] to the Patriarchs before it was publicly given at Mount Sinai, while the official title of High Priest was conferred upon Aaron after the erection of the ]. The Midrash records that Shem functioned as {{transliteration|hbo|]}} (high priest) in that he taught ] to the Patriarchs before it was publicly given at Mount Sinai, while the official title of High Priest was conferred upon Aaron after the erection of the ].


====Midrash text==== ====Midrash text====
The Midrash quotes multiple aspects of both Melchizedek and Abram; The Rabbis taught that Melchizedek acted as a ] and handed down ] robes to Abram (Numbers Rabbah 4:8). The Midrash quotes multiple aspects of both Melchizedek and Abram; the Rabbis taught that Melchizedek acted as a ] and handed down ] robes to Abram (Numbers Rabbah 4:8).


Rabbi Isaac the Babylonian said that Melchizedek was born ] (Genesis Rabbah 43:6). Melchizedek called Jerusalem “Salem. (Genesis Rabbah 56:10.) The Rabbis said that Melchizedek instructed Abram in the ]. (Genesis Rabbah 43:6.) Rabbi Eleazar said that Melchizedek’s school was one of three places where the Holy Spirit (]) manifested Himself (Babylonian Talmud Makkot 23b). Rabbi Isaac the Babylonian said that Melchizedek was born ] (Genesis Rabbah 43:6). Melchizedek called Jerusalem "Salem." (Genesis Rabbah 56:10.) The Rabbis said that Melchizedek instructed Abram in the ]. (Genesis Rabbah 43:6.) Rabbi Eleazar said that Melchizedek's school was one of three places where the Holy Spirit ({{transliteration|hbo|]}}) manifested himself (Babylonian Talmud Makkot 23b).


Rabbi Judah said in Rabbi Nehorai's name that Melchizedek’s blessing yielded prosperity for Abram, Isaac, and Jacob (Genesis Rabbah 43:8). Ephraim Miksha'ah the disciple of Rabbi Meir said in the latter's name that ] descended from Melchizedek (Genesis Rabbah 85:10). Rabbi Judah said in Rabbi Nehorai's name that Melchizedek's blessing yielded prosperity for Abram, Isaac, and Jacob (Genesis Rabbah 43:8). Ephraim Miksha'ah the disciple of Rabbi Meir said in the latter's name that ] descended from Melchizedek (Genesis Rabbah 85:10).


Rabbi Hana bar Bizna citing Rabbi Simeon Hasida identified Melchizedek as one of the four craftsmen of whom ] wrote in {{Bibleverse||Zechariah|2:3.|HE}} (Babylonian Talmud Sukkah 52b; see also ] 2:33 (crediting Rabbi Berekiah in the name of Rabbi Isaac).) The Talmud teaches that ] wrote the Book of ], including in it the work of the elders, including Melchizedek.<ref>(in {{Bibleverse||Psalm|110|HE}}). (Babylonian Talmud Baba Batra 14b–15a.)</ref> Rabbi Hana bar Bizna citing Rabbi Simeon Hasida identified Melchizedek as one of the four craftsmen of whom ] wrote in Zechariah 2:3.<ref>{{Bibleverse|Zechariah|2:3|HE}}</ref> (Babylonian Talmud Sukkah 52b; see also ] 2:33 (crediting Rabbi Berekiah in the name of Rabbi Isaac).) The Talmud teaches that ] wrote the Book of ], including in it the work of the elders, including Melchizedek.<ref>(in {{Bibleverse|Psalm|110|HE}}). (Babylonian Talmud Baba Batra 14b–15a.)</ref>


Thus according to some rabbis{{Who|date=May 2011}} confusion over Melchizedek being both King and Priest is solved by knowing that Shem was also a progenitor of the Davidic Monarchy, which descended from both Judah and ], who was the daughter (or granddaughter by some opinions) of Shem.{{Or|date=May 2011}} Thus according to Jewish legend, confusion over Melchizedek being both King and Priest is solved by knowing that Shem was also a progenitor of the Davidic Monarchy, which descended from both Judah and ], who was sentenced to 'death by fire' when accused of committing prostitution as the daughter of high priest Shem.<ref>Ginzberg, Louis (1909). ''The Legends of the Jews '' (translated by Henrietta Szold) Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society.</ref>


===In the Zohar=== ===In the Zohar===
The ] (redacted by ] c. 1290s) finds in “Melchizedek king of Salem” a reference to “the King Who rules with complete sovereignty,” or according to another explanation, that “Melchizedek” alludes to the lower world and “king of Salem” to the upper world (Zohar 1:86b–87a). The Zohar's commentary on Genesis 14 cites a Rabbi Yitzchak as saying that it was God who gave tithe to Abram in the form of removing the Hebrew letter '']'' from his throne of glory and presenting it to the soul of Abram for his benefit.{{Citation needed|date=June 2011}} The letter ''he'' is the letter God added to Abram's name to become "Abra-ha-m" in Genesis. The ] (redacted by ] {{c.|1290s}}) finds in "Melchizedek king of Salem" a reference to "the King Who rules with complete sovereignty". or according to another explanation, that "Melchizedek" alludes to the lower world and "king of Salem" to the upper world (Zohar 1:86b–87a). The Zohar's commentary on Genesis 14 cites a Rabbi Yitzchak as saying that it was God who gave tithe to Abram in the form of removing the Hebrew letter {{transliteration|he|]}} from his throne of glory and presenting it to the soul of Abram for his benefit.{{Citation needed|date=June 2011}} The letter {{transliteration|he|he}} is the letter God added to Abram's name to become "Abra-ha-m" in Genesis.


==In Christianity== ==In Christianity==
] at ] wooden church, ], ]]] ] at ] wooden church, ], ]]]
{{Main|Melchizedek priesthood}} {{Main article|Melchizedek priesthood}}
In the ], references to Melchizedek appear only in the ] (later 1st century AD), though these are extensive (''Hebrews'' 5:6, 10; 6:20; 7:1, 10, 11, 15, 17, 21). ] is there identified as ''a priest forever in the order of Melchizedek'' quoting from {{Bibleverse||Ps.|110:4|HE}}.<ref>{{Bibleref2|Hebrews|5:6}}</ref> In the ], references to Melchizedek appear only in the ], though these are extensive (Hebrews 5:6, 10; 6:20; 7:1, 10, 11, 15, 17, 21).<ref>{{bibleverse|Hebrews|5:6–10}}; {{bibleverse|Hebrews|6:20}}; {{bibleverse|Hebrews|7:1–21}}</ref> ] is there identified as "a priest forever in the order of Melchizedek", quoting from Psalm 110:4.<ref>{{Bibleverse|Psalm|110:4|KJV}}</ref><ref>{{Bibleverse|Hebrews|5:6|KJV}}</ref>

In {{Bibleverse||Heb.|7:3|HE}} , Melchizedek is described as an extraordinary person in ways that are unique in the biblical narrative. In {{Bibleverse||Heb.|7:3|HE}}, Melchizedek is depicted as being "Without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life"; thus giving him an almost godlike status.


===Association with the Messiah=== ===Association with the Messiah===
The association or identification of Melchizedek with the ] predates Christianity, developing in ] of the ].{{citation needed|date=September 2015}} The association or identification of Melchizedek with the ] predates Christianity, developing in ] of the ].


A collection of early ] scripts dating on or before the 4th century, discovered in 1945 and known as the ], contains a tractate pertaining to Melchizedek. Here it is proposed that Melchizedek ''is'' Jesus Christ.<ref>{{cite book| author= Robinson, James M (translator)| authorlink=James M. Robinson| year= 1978 |title=The Nag Hammadi Library in English}}</ref> Melchizedek, as Jesus Christ, lives, preaches, dies and is resurrected, in a gnostic perspective. ''The Coming of the Son of God Melchizedek'' speaks of his return to bring peace, supported by the gods, and he is a priest-king who dispenses justice.<ref>Text of the tractate: http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/melchiz.html</ref> A collection of early ] scripts dating on or before the 4th century, discovered in 1945 and known as the ], contains a tractate pertaining to Melchizedek. Here it is proposed that Melchizedek {{em|is}} Jesus Christ.<ref>{{cite book|author= Robinson, James M |author-link=James M. Robinson|year= 1978 |title=The Nag Hammadi Library in English}}</ref> Melchizedek, as Jesus Christ, lives, preaches, dies and is resurrected, in a gnostic perspective. '']'' speaks of his return to bring peace, supported by God, and he is a priest-king who dispenses justice.<ref>Text of the tractate: http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/melchiz.html</ref>


The association with ] is made explicit by the author of the ], where Melchizedek the "king of righteousness" and "king of peace" is explicitly associated with the "eternal priesthood" of the ].<ref>Gareth Lee Cockerill, "The Epistle to the Hebrews", vol. 29 of ''The New International Commentary on the New Testament''. The association with ] is made explicit by the author of the ], where Melchizedek the "king of righteousness" and "king of peace" is explicitly associated with the "eternal priesthood" of the ].<ref>Gareth Lee Cockerill, "The Epistle to the Hebrews", vol. 29 of ''The New International Commentary on the New Testament''.
Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2012, (fn. 14).</ref><ref>Willard M. Swartley, ''Covenant of Peace'', Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2006, .</ref><ref>Gary Staats, ''A Christological Commentary on Hebrews'' (2012), : " is identifying Melchizedek as a king of righteousness and a king of peace. He thus becomes a beautiful type of Jesus Christ who is also the final King of righteousness and the final King of peace."</ref>
Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2012, (fn. 14).
Willard M. Swartley, ''Covenant of Peace'', Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2006, .
Gary Staats, ''A Christological Commentary on Hebrews'' (2012), : " is identifying Melchizedek as a king of righteousness and a king of peace. He thus becomes a beautiful type of Jesus Christ who is also the final King of righteousness and the final King of peace."</ref> The ] interpretation of this Old Testament character being a prefiguration or prototype of the Christ has varied between Christian denominations. The ] saw in Melchizedek merely a man who lived a perfect life.<ref>Philip Edgcumbe Hughes, ''A Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews'' p. 244</ref>


This association between Melchizedek and Jesus is indirectly supported by a quotation attributed directly to Jesus himself in the ], in which Jesus obliquely claims to have personally met Abraham: "Abraham your father rejoiced to see my day; he saw it and was glad." (John 8:56.)<ref>{{cite web |url=https://mail.biblehub.com/nabre/john/8.htm |title=John 8 New American Bible }}</ref>
] association of Jesus Christ with Old Testament characters occurs frequently in the New Testament; thus, Jesus Christ is also associated with Adam (as the "]") and with ].<ref>"Jesus Christ is not only typologically linked with the priestly order of Melchizedek, but fulfills and supersedes Melchizedek's person and role" Willard M. Swartley, ''Covenant of Peace'', Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2006, </ref>

The ] interpretation of this Old Testament character being a prefiguration or prototype of the Christ has varied between Christian denominations. ] association of Jesus Christ with Old Testament characters occurs frequently in the New Testament and in later Christian writings; thus, Jesus Christ is also associated with Adam (as the "]") and with ].<ref>"Jesus Christ is not only typologically linked with the priestly order of Melchizedek, but fulfills and supersedes Melchizedek's person and role" Willard M. Swartley, ''Covenant of Peace'', Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2006, </ref> The bread and wine offering of Melchizedek has been interpreted by church fathers including ] as being a prefiguration of the ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.hprweb.com/2018/09/christ-melchizedek-and-the-eucharistic-sacrifice/|title=Christ, Melchizedek, and the Eucharistic Sacrifice|date=3 September 2018}}</ref>

The ] saw in Melchizedek merely a man who lived a perfect life.<ref>Philip Edgcumbe Hughes, ''A Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews'', p. 244</ref>


===Liturgical commemoration=== ===Liturgical commemoration===
Melchizedek is mentioned in the ], the First ] of the ] of the ], and also figures in the current ] as a commemoration on August 26.<ref>''Martyrologium Romanum ex Decreto Sacrosancti Concilii Oecumenici Vaticani II instauratum, auctoritate Ioannis Pauli Pp. II promulgatum'', editio altera, Typis vaticanis, , p. 476.</ref> Melchizedek is mentioned in the ], the First ] of the ] of the ], and also figures in the current ] as a commemoration on August 26.<ref>''Martyrologium Romanum ex Decreto Sacrosancti Concilii Oecumenici Vaticani II instauratum, auctoritate Ioannis Pauli Pp. II promulgatum'', editio altera, Typis vaticanis, , p. 476.</ref>


He is commemorated in the ] on May 22,<ref>''.'' Orthodox Calendar (Provaslavie.ru).</ref> and on the "Sunday of the Forefathers" (two Sundays before Christmas). In the ] of the ] Melkisetek (]: Մելքիսեդեք, ''Melkisetek'') is commemorated as one of the Holy Forefathers on July 26. He is commemorated in the ] on May 22,<ref>'' {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140822184924/http://days.pravoslavie.ru/en/Days/20120522.htm |date=2014-08-22 }}.'' Orthodox Calendar (Provaslavie.ru).</ref> and on the "Sunday of the Forefathers" (two Sundays before Christmas). In the ] of the ] Melkisetek ({{langx|hy|Մելքիսեդեք|translit=Melkisetek}}) is commemorated as one of the Holy Forefathers on July 26.


===Protestantism=== ===Protestantism===
Traditional Protestant Christian denominations, ], teach that Melchizedek was a historical figure and an archetype of Christ.<ref>Luther's works: First lectures on the Psalms II, Psalms 76-126 Martin Luther, Hilton C. Oswald – 1976 "After the order of Melchizedek, which is understood, first, in accordance with the name. ... Therefore He is the true Melchizedek. Second, this is understood in accordance with the office, because Melchizedek offered the bread and wine"</ref> Traditional Protestant Christian denominations, ], teach that Melchizedek was a historical figure and an archetype of Christ.<ref>Luther's works: First lectures on the Psalms II, Psalms 76-126 Martin Luther, Hilton C. Oswald – 1976 "After the order of Melchizedek, which is understood, first, in accordance with the name.{{nbsp}} Therefore He is the true Melchizedek. Second, this is understood in accordance with the office, because Melchizedek offered the bread and wine"</ref>


] notes that a popular understanding of the relationship between Melchizedek and Jesus is that Melchizedek is an Old Testament ] – in other words, that Melchizedek ''is'' Jesus.<ref>{{cite book|last=Longman|first=Tremper|author-link=Tremper Longman|title=How To Read Genesis|year=2005|page=172|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SKEJ3kT7S2kC&pg=PA172}}</ref> ] notes that a popular understanding of the relationship between Melchizedek and Jesus is that Melchizedek is an Old Testament ] – in other words, that Melchizedek {{em|is}} Jesus, or at the very least, is a close resemblance of Jesus.<ref>{{cite book|last=Longman|first=Tremper|author-link=Tremper Longman|title=How To Read Genesis|year=2005|page=172|publisher=InterVarsity Press |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SKEJ3kT7S2kC&pg=PA172|isbn=9780830875603}}</ref>


===Latter Day Saint movement=== ===Latter Day Saint movement===
In the ], the ] makes reference to Melchizedek in (] 13:17–19).<ref></ref> According to ''Encyclopædia Britannica'', ], the movement's founder, "appointed his male followers to priesthoods, named for the biblical figures Melchizedek and Aaron, that were overseen by the office of High Priest", incorporating selected practices from the Hebrew Bible.<ref name="Britannica-JosephSmith">{{cite web|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Joseph-Smith-American-religious-leader-1805-1844|title=Joseph Smith — American religious leader (1805–1844)|first=Richard L.|last=Bushman|date=25 April 2017|website=Encyclopedia Britannica|access-date=30 May 2017|quote=He appointed his male followers to priesthoods, named for the biblical figures Melchizedek and Aaron, that were overseen by the office of High Priest.}}</ref> These priesthoods are laid out by Smith in Doctrine and Covenants 107:1–2, 4, 6–10, 14, 17–18, 22, 29, 71, 73, 76,<ref></ref> as well as more than twenty additional references in that work.
In the ], the ] makes reference to Melchizedek (] ).
In ], Melchizedek is described as "a man of faith, who wrought righteousness; and when a child he feared God, and stopped the mouths of lions." Because he was a righteous and God-fearing man, Melchizedek was "ordained a high priest" () The Joseph Smith Translation notes that, when the Epistle to the Hebrew speaks of Melchizedek, it is the order of the priesthood named for him that is without father and mother, etc., and not Melchizedek himself (JST Bible Hebrews 7:3).


The largest denomination in the movement, ], states it derives authority to act in God's name through the Melchizedek Priesthood, both from an administrative perspective—performing sacred ordinances—and a ministering capacity. According to the church's summary of the , there are but two priesthoods, "the Melchizedek and the Aaronic." And that the Melchizedek is the higher or greater priesthood, "after the order of the Son of God (or Jesus Christ)." According to their doctrine, this priesthood is the priesthood of Jesus Christ himself, i.e. it is his power which he delegates to certain persons as he sees fit by "calling". This power is not directly cited as His power to avoid the frequent repetition of His sacred name.<ref></ref> Its offices include elder, high priest, patriarch, seventy, and apostle.<ref></ref>
According to the ], Melchizedek is a descendant of Noah (). Latter Day Saints are unclear as to whether Melchizedek ''was'' Shem, or a descendant of Shem.<ref>] taught the former – perhaps due to Jasher 16:11, which refers to Shem as ''Adonizedek''. ] taught the latter.{{citation needed|date=March 2015}}.
LDS ''Doctrine and Covenants'' 138:41 mentions "Shem, the Great High Priest" but not Melchizedek in a recitation of prominent righteous people who are now dead. In 1973, an article in an official LDS Church magazine quoted this passage and others and came to the conclusion that there was not enough revealed knowledge to answer the question definitively. Alma E. Gygi, , '']'', November 1973.</ref>
The Latter Day Saint ] is named after him, so as not to over-use the name of the Son of God, after whom it was originally named.<ref> (LDS Church ed.).</ref>


==In other traditions== ==In Islam==
Although Melchizedek is not referred to in the ], some have identified him with the figure known as the ]. In ], Melchizedek (known as Malik as-Salām; {{lit|King of Peace}}) is believed to have been the one to initiate Abraham into prophethood.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://ismailignosis.com/2018/03/28/world-of-faith-the-imams-dais-and-the-ismaili-dawah/ |title=WORLD OF FAITH: THE IMAM'S DA'IS AND THE ISMAILI DA'WAH |date=March 28, 2018 |access-date=November 12, 2018}}</ref> An Ismaili treatise dated to the 1300s proclaimed that Melchizedek would return following the ] as a righteous judge and reveal the divine mysteries which the prophets have kept secret throughout the centuries.<ref>{{cite book |last=Livingstone |first=David |date=2002 |title=The Dying God: The Hidden History of Western Civilization |page=260 |publisher=iUniverse |isbn=0595231993}}</ref>
There is no mention of Melchizedek in the ] or in early ] ] or ]. Some later commentators, including ], however, did suggest a link between Melchizedek and ]. They referred to the allegory of Melchizedek in the ]<ref>''Hebrews'', VII, 3</ref> as a parallel to the ] view of ].<ref>Abdullah Yusuf Ali, Qur'anic Commentary, notes on ''Surah Kahf'', dealing with Khidr.</ref> In ], however, Melchizedek is of greater importance as one of the 'Permanent Imams'; that is those who guide people through the ages of history.<ref>''Concise Encyclopedia of Islam'', C. Glasse, ''Ismailis'': "(Ismaili's believe in) a 'permanent Imam' (namely Malik Shulim, Malik Yazdaq, Malik as-Salim – all different names for Melchizedek) – Ma'add, the ancestor of the North Arabians, and, again, Ali..."</ref>


== In modern culture ==
There appears to have been no mention made of Melchizedek in either the writings of the ] or ]. However, ], the eldest son of Baha'u'llah, and Shoghi Effendi, both recognised Melchizedek as a ] (prophet). Abdu’l-Bahá recognised his prophethood based on the fact that Melchizedek received tithes from Abraham according to Genesis 14:20. Furthermore, a letter written on behalf of ], the great grandson of Baha'u'llah, states that 'Melchizedek was certainly a prophet,' though it acknowledges that little is known about the prophet.<ref>{{cite web|last= Lambden |first= Stephen |title= The Enigmatic Melchizedek |date= October 2013 |url= http://hurqalya.ucmerced.edu/sites/hurqalya.ucmerced.edu/files/page/documents/melchizedek.pdf |website= Hurqalya Publications: Center for Shaykhī and Bābī-Bahā’ī Studies |publisher= ] |accessdate= 2016-06-15 |quote= also figures in an eschatologically oriented Qumran text ... where he appears as an archangel, a Michael-like figure who acts as an agent of God in eschatological times.}}</ref>
Melchizedek appears as a character in ]'s novel '']'', where he guides the protagonist, Santiago.<ref></ref>

Melchisedec is the name of a rat befriended by Sarah Crewe in ] by ].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Burnett |first=Frances Hodgson |url=http://archive.org/details/ALittlePrincess_201303 |title=A Little Princess}}</ref>


==See also== ==See also==
{{Commons category}}
{{Wikisource1911Enc|Melchizedek}}
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
Line 208: Line 213:


==Notes== ==Notes==
{{Reflist|2}} {{notelist}}

== References ==
{{Reflist}}


==Further reading== ==Further reading==
* {{cite book |last=Dallmann |first=Robert W. |year=2013 |title=Melchisedec: A Character Study |url=http://www.christ-like.net/melchisedec.html |location=Niagara Falls, NY |publisher=ChristLife |isbn=9780991489114}}
*{{cite book |first=Fred L. |last=Horton |authorlink=Fred L. Horton |title=The Melchizedek Tradition: A Critical Examination of the Sources to the Fifth Century A.D. and in the Epistle to the Hebrews |publisher=] |location=] |year=1976}}
*{{cite book |first=Franco |last=Manzi |authorlink=Franco Manzi |title=Melchisedek e l'angelologia nell'Epistola agli Ebrei e a Qumran |publisher=Editrice Pontificio Istituto Biblico |location=] |year=1997 |page= 433 |isbn=978-88-7653-136-1}} * {{cite book |last=Horton |first=Fred L. |title=The Melchizedek Tradition: A Critical Examination of the Sources to the Fifth Century A.D. and in the Epistle to the Hebrews |publisher=] |location=] |year=1976}}
*{{cite book |first=James L. |last=Kugel |authorlink=James Kugel |title=Traditions of the Bible: a guide to the Bible as it was at the start of the common era |publisher=] |location=] |year=1998 |pages=275–93 |isbn=0-674-79151-7 |chapter=Melchizedek |chapterurl=https://books.google.com/books?id=VNFnnwcV8jAC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_summary_r&cad=0#PPA275,M1}} * {{cite book |last=Kugel |first=James L. |author-link=James Kugel |title=Traditions of the Bible: A Guide to the Bible as It Was at the Start of the Common Era |publisher=] |location=] |year=1998 |pages=275–93 |isbn=0-674-79151-7 |chapter=Melchizedek |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VNFnnwcV8jAC&pg=PA275}}
*{{cite web |title=Priesthood of Melchizedek |url=http://www.letusreason.org/Doct16.htm}} * {{cite web |title=Priesthood of Melchizedek |url=http://www.letusreason.org/Doct16.htm |publisher=Let Us Reason Ministries |date=2009}}
* {{cite book |last=Manzi |first=Franco |author-link=Franco Manzi |title=Melchisedek e l'angelologia nell'Epistola agli Ebrei e a Qumran |publisher=Editrice Pontificio Istituto Biblico |location=] |year=1997 |page= 433 |isbn=978-88-7653-136-1}}
*Dallmann, Robert W. (2013) '''' <ref>{{Cite web|title = Melchisedec – A Character Study|url = https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/22736278-melchisedec---a-character-study|website = Goodreads|accessdate = 2015-10-23}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title = Melchisedec – A Character Study|url = http://www.amazon.com/Melchisedec-Character-Study-Robert-Dallmann-ebook/dp/B00BGTGJS6#customerReviews|publisher = ChristLife, Inc.|date = 2013-02-15|language = English|first = Robert|last = Dallmann}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title = Melchisedec – a Character Study|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=ZV7RoQEACAAJ|publisher = ChristLife, Incorporated|date = 2013-02-15|isbn = 9780991489114|language = en|first = Robert|last = Dallmann}}</ref> <nowiki> ISBN 978-09-9148-911-4</nowiki>
* {{cite book|last1=Mathews |first1=Joshua G. |title=Melchizedek's Alternative Priestly Order: A Compositional Analysis of Genesis 14:18–20 and Its Echoes Throughout the Tanak|date=2013|publisher=Eisenbrauns|location=Winona Lake, IN|isbn=978-1-57506-820-6}}
* Williams, Logan (2023). . ''Journal for the Study of the New Testament'' 46: 111–149.
* Speculations on Melchizedek

== External links ==
{{Commons category}}
* {{Cite EB1911|wstitle=Melchizedek}}


{{Extra-Quranic Prophets of Islam}}
{{The Nag Hammadi Codices |state=collapsed}}
{{Catholic saints}}
{{Authority control}}


] ]
]
]
] ]
] ]
]
]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 15:51, 11 December 2024

Biblical Figure For other uses, see Melchizedek (disambiguation).
Melchizedek
Detail from Abraham and Melchizedek by Juan Antonio de Frías y Escalante, 1668
Priest and King of Salem
Venerated in
CanonizedPre-Congregation
Feast

In the Hebrew Bible, Melchizedek was the king of Salem and priest of El Elyon (often translated as 'most high God'). He is first mentioned in Genesis 14:18–20, where he brings out bread and wine and then blesses Abram, and El Elyon or "the Lord, God Most High". Abram was returning from pursuing the kings who came from the East and gave him a "tenth of everything".

In Christianity, according to the Epistle to the Hebrews, Jesus Christ is identified as "High priest forever in the order of Melchizedek", and so Jesus assumes the role of High Priest once and for all. Chazalic literature – specifically Targum Jonathan, Targum Yerushalmi, and the Babylonian Talmud – presents his name (מלכי־צדק‎) as a nickname for Shem.

Joseph Blenkinsopp has suggested that the story of Melchizedek is an informal insertion into the Genesis narration, possibly inserted in order to give validity to the priesthood and titles connected with the Second Temple. It has also been conjectured that the suffix "-zedek" may have been or become a reference to a Canaanite deity worshipped in pre-Israelite Jerusalem.

Name

In the majority of Masoretic Hebrew texts the name is written as two words, Malki-ṣedeq מלכי־צדק‎, rendered in one word in both the Septuagint (Μελχισεδέκ) and Vulgate (Melchisedech). The Authorised King James Version of 1611 renders the name "Melchizedek" when translating from the Hebrew, and "Melchisedec" in the New Testament.

The name is composed from the two elements: melek(h), 'king', and ṣedeq, which means either 'righteousness' or the proper name Zedek. With the addition of the hiriq compaginis () indicating the archaic construct form, malk-ī means 'king of', so that the name literally translates to 'king of righteousness' or 'my king is Zedek', indicating that he worshipped Zedek, a Canaanite deity worshipped in pre-Israelite Jerusalem. The latter, however, is often dismissed since Hebrews 7:2 gives the translation of the name Melchizedek as "king of righteousness", although Robert R. Cargill has recently argued in favour of that etymology. Mainstream scholarly understanding of these names ("My King is Righteousness" and "My Lord is Righteousness" respectively) is that they refer to the concept of righteousness and not to a god.

The name is formed in parallel with Adoni-ṣedeq אדני־צדק‎, also a king of Salem, mentioned in Joshua 10:1–3, where the element malik ('king') is replaced by adon ('lord'). Parallel theophoric names, with Sedeq replaced by Yahu, are those of Malchijah and Adonijah, both biblical characters placed in the time of David.

Hebrew Bible

Genesis 14

The narrative of Genesis 14 is part of the larger story telling how Abram returns from defeating king Chedorlaomer and meets with Bera the king of Sodom, at which point:

And Melchizedek king of Salem brought out bread and wine: and he was the priest of the most high God. And he blessed him, and said, 'Blessed be Abram to the most high God, possessor of heaven and earth, And blessed be the most high God, which hath delivered thine enemies into thy hand'. And he gave him tithe from all.

— Genesis 14:18–20, King James Version

Some textual critics classify the narration as not being derived from any of the usual pentateuchal sources. It has been speculated that verses 18–20 (in which Melchizedek appears) are an informal insertion into the narration, as they interrupt the account of the meeting of Abraham with the king of Sodom. There is no consensus on when or why the story might have been added. It may have been inserted in order to give validity to the priesthood and tithes connected with the Second Temple. It also may have been inserted to give validity to the superiority of the Zadokite priests over the Levite priests.

Lebanese Protestant scholar Kamal Salibi (1929–2011) observes that Hebrew: ֹמַעֲשֵׂר‎, m'sr, which literally does mean 'tenth', might more loosely be used to mean 'portion', and Hebrew: מִכֹּל‎, m-kl, or 'from all', might refer just to food in the giver's possession, so that the whole verse might mean "He gave him a portion of food".

Genesis 14:18 introduces Melchizedek, a "Priest of the Most High God" (El Elyon), a term which is re-used in Genesis 14:19–20 and Genesis 14:22. The term "Most High" is used another twenty times to refer to the God of Israel in the Psalms. Giorgio Levi Della Vida (1944) suspects that this is a late development, and Joseph Fitzmyer (1962) connects Genesis 14 with the mention of a god called "Most High," who may appear according to one of three possible translations of a 750 BC inscription found at Al-Safirah in Syria. Remi Lack (1962) considers that the Genesis verses were taken over by Jewish redactor(s), for whom El was already identified with YHWH, El-Elyon became an epithet for the God of Israel.

Tithe recipient

Due to an ambiguity in the Hebrew text, it is unclear who gave tithe to whom: Abram to Melchizedek, or Melchizedek to Abram: the verse in question states simply, "And gave him tithe from all" (v-yiten-lo ma'aser mekol, ויתן לו מעשר מכל‎). Most translations of this verse preserve the ambiguity, "he gave to him", but some modern translations make explicit the mainstream interpretation of Abram being the giver and Melchizedek the recipient.

Targum Pseudo-Jonathan, the Book of Jubilees, Josephus, Philo of Alexandria, and Rashi all read Abram as the giver of the tithe to Melchizedek. The Rogatchover Gaon, also understanding Abram to be the tithe giver, comments that the presented tithe was not a standard tithe (Maaser Rishon) as described in the Torah (given on an annual basis), but was a one-time "tribute offering" (trumat ha-mekhes, תרומת המכס‎), such as Moses gave to God in Numbers 31:41.

Expressing a kabbalistic point of view, the Zohar commentary to Genesis 14 cites Rabbi Yitzchak as saying that it was God who gave a tithe to Abram in the form of removing the Hebrew letter He from his own throne of glory and presenting it to the soul of Abram for his benefit.

Rabbi Meir Simcha of Dvinsk (1843–1926) interprets the phrase "And he gave him tithe from all" as a verbal continuation of Melchizedek's speech, i.e., Melchizedek exclaimed that God had chosen to gift Abram a tenth of God's possession of the entire human race (consisting of seventy nations as described in Genesis) in the form of the seven nations of the land of Canaan, including the cities of Sodom that Abram succeeded in saving. Rabbi Meir Simcha argues that continued speech of this sort was a common form of prophetic expression.

Psalm 110

Main article: Psalm 110

The second and final Hebrew Bible mention of Melchizedek is in Psalm 110:4. The many translations that follow the Septuagint translate it as:

The LORD hath sworn, and will not repent: 'Thou art a priest for ever after the manner of Melchizedek.'

— (JPS 1917)

Although the above is the traditional translation of the text, the Hebrew text can be interpreted in various ways, and the New Jewish Publication Society of America Tanakh, (1985 edition), for example, has:

You are a priest forever, a rightful king by My decree.

— JPS 1985)

Another alternative keeps Melchizedek as a personal name but changes the identity of the person addressed: "You are a priest forever by my order (or 'on my account'), O Melchizedek" – here it is Melchizedek who is being addressed throughout the psalm.

The majority of Chazalic literature attributes the primary character of the psalm as King David who was a "righteous king" (מלכי צדק‎) of Salem and, like Melchizedek, had certain priest-like responsibilities, while the Babylonian Talmud understands the chapter as referring to Abram who was victorious in battling to save his nephew Lot and merited priesthood. The Zohar defines the noted Melchizedek as referring to Ahron the Kohen Gadol (high priest).

Samaritan Pentateuch

The Samaritan Pentateuch reads שלמו‎ (lit. 'his peace' or in contextual flow 'allied with him') in place of the Masoretic שלם‎ (Salem), with addition of a letter ו‎ (vav).

William F. Albright views the Samaritan wording as authentic as does the New American Bible.

Regarding the residence of Melchizedek, Samaritan tradition identified a "Salem" as a place on the slopes of Mount Gerizim which served as a blessing place of the children of Israel upon their initial crossing of the Jordan river. The Samaritans allocate Gerizim (and not Jerusalem) as the site intended for the Temple, and thus the "שלמו‎" text serves an obvious sectarian purpose. However, this practice is not solely associated with the Samaritans: the possessive suffix is also found in the 3rd- or 2nd-century BC Book of Jubilees, and Greek possessive suffixes are even used in the Septuagint version of Genesis.

New Testament

With respect to Genesis 14:20, Hebrews chapter 7 verses 2 and 4 in the New Testament state that the patriarch Abraham gave a tenth of the spoil to Melchizedek.

Psalm 110:4 is cited in the New Testament letter to the Hebrews as an indicator that Jesus, regarded in the letter as the Messiah, had a right to a priesthood pre-dating the Jewish Aaronic priesthood (Hebrews 5:5–6).

In Judaism

Hasmonean dynasty

The Mishnah recounts that Hasmonean rulers used to identify themselves as "High Priest of El Elyon": "When the Hasmonean kingdom became strong and defeated the Greeks, they instituted that people should mention the name of Heaven even in their legal documents. And therefore they would write: In year such and such of Yoḥanan the High Priest of the God Most High." Scholars have observed that the Hasmoneans used Melchizedek's example of monarch-priest to justify occupying both offices.

Late Hellenistic Judaism

Josephus refers to Melchizedek as a "Canaanite chief" in The Jewish War, but as a priest in Antiquities of the Jews.

Philo identifies Melchizedek with the Logos as priest of God, and honoured as an untutored priesthood.

The Second Book of Enoch (also called "Slavonic Enoch") is apparently a Jewish sectarian work of the 1st century AD. The last section of the work, the Exaltation of Melchizedek, tells how Melchizedek was born of a virgin, Sofonim (or Sopanima), the wife of Nir, a brother of Noah. The child came out from his mother after she had died and sat on the bed beside her corpse, already physically developed, clothed, speaking and blessing the Lord, and marked with the badge of priesthood. Forty days later, Melchizedek was taken by the archangel Gabriel (Michael in some manuscripts) to the Garden of Eden and was thus preserved from the Deluge without having to be in Noah's Ark.

The Story of Melchizedek is a short pseudepigraphon composed in Greek in the first three centuries AD, probably in a Jewish milieu. It survives today only in Christian recensions, but in at least ten languages.

Dead Sea Scrolls

11Q13 (11QMelch) is a fragment of a text, dated to the end of the second or start of the first century BC, about Melchizedek, found in Cave 11 at Qumran in the West Bank and part of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Melchizedek is seen as a divine being in the text and is referred to as "El" or "Elohim", titles usually reserved for God. According to the text, Melchizedek will proclaim the "Day of Atonement" and he will atone for the people who are predestined to him. He also will judge the peoples.

The Genesis Apocryphon (1QapGen) repeats information from Genesis.

The Qumran Scrolls, also indicate that Melchizedek was used as a name of the Archangel Michael, interpreted as a heavenly priest; Michael as Melchi-zedek contrast with Belial, who is given the name of Melchi-resha 'king of wickedness'. The text of the Epistle to the Hebrews follows this interpretation in stating explicitly that the name in Greek translation (ἑρμηνευόμενος) means βασιλεὺς δικαιοσύνης ('king of righteousness'), omitting translation of the possessive suffix; the same passage interprets Melchizedek's title of king of Salem as translating to βασιλεὺς εἰρήνης 'king of peace', the context being the presentation of Melchizedek's as an eternal priesthood associated with Jesus Christ (ἀφωμοιωμένος δὲ τῷ υἱῷ τοῦ θεοῦ μένει ἱερεὺς εἰς τὸ διηνεκές, 'made like unto the Son of God abideth a priest continually').

Torah commentaries

Hebrew-language Torah commentarians of the Rishonim era (11th to 15th centuries) have explained the (seemingly) abrupt intrusion of Melchizedek into the narration in various ways; Hezekiah ben Manoah (c. 1250) points out that the following verses have Abraham refusing any of the king of Sodom's possessions which, if not for the insertion of Melchizedek's hospitality, would prompt the query as to where Abraham and his weary men got their refreshments from. The Rashbam, Shmuel ben Meir (11th century), offers a similar explanation but varies by saying that only Abram's men partook in the booty (originally belonging to the king of Sodom) whereas the Melchizedek intrusion explains that Abram himself was sustained by Melchizedek since he refused to consume of the luxury of Sodom because his Lord was of the non-material world. Likewise, the commentary of Chaim ibn Attar (17th century) offers a three-pronged slew of reasons for the Melchizedek insertion.

In rabbinic literature

The narrative preceding Melchizedek's introduction presents a picture of Melchizedek's involvement in the events of his era. The narration details Abram's rescue of his nephew Lot and his spectacular defeat of multiple kings and goes on to define the meeting place of Melchizedek and Abram as "Emek HaShaveh which is Emek HaMelech". The meeting site has been associated with Emek Yehoshaphat (the Valley of Josaphat). Targum Onkelos describes the meeting location's size as "a plot the size of a king's Riis". Midrashic exegesis describes how a large group of governors and kings convened in unison to pay homage to the victor Abram and desired to make him a deity, at which point he declined, attributing his victory to God's might and will alone.

The chronological work Seder ha-Dorot (published 1769) quotes that Melchizedek was the first to initiate and complete a wall in circumference of the city, and had to exit Salem to reach Abram and his men. Upon exiting Salem, he presented to them "bread and wine" with the intent to refresh them from their journey. Assuming the premise that Melchizedek was Shem, he would have been 465 years old at the time and Abram was 75 years of age.

Chazalic literature unanimously identify Melchizedek as Shem son of Noah (Targum Yonathan to Genesis chapter 14, Genesis Rabbah 46:7, Babylonian Talmud to Tractate Nedarim 32b). The Talmud Bavli attributes him (Shem and his beth din court of justice) as pioneers in banning prostitution (Avodah Zarah p. 36a).

Middle Eastern land distribution demonstrating the land of Canaan governed by Cham

There is, however, disagreement amongst Rishonim as to whether Salem was Melchizedek/Shem's allocated residence by his father Noah or whether he was a foreigner in Salem which was considered the rightful land of his brother Cham. The Ramban is of the opinion that the land was rightfully owned and governed by the offspring of Cham, and explains that Melchizedek/Shem left his home country and came to Salem as a foreigner wishing to serve God as a Kohen. However, Rashi maintains that the land of Canaan was initially allotted to Shem, by Noah his father, and the offspring of Cham conquered the land by forced expansion.

Transition of the Priesthood

Main article: Brith HaKehuna

Although Melchizedek is the first person in the Torah to be titled a Kohen (priest), the medrash records that he was preceded in priesthood (kehuna) by Adam. Rabbinic commentarians to the Torah explain that Melchizedek – (sometimes associated with Shem) – was given the priesthood (Hebrew: kehuna) by receipt of his father Noah's blessing "G-d beatified Yefeth and will dwell in the house of Shem"; i.e., he will merit to serve and host God as a Kohen.

Torah Laws require that the Kohen (priest) must be a patrilineal descendant of a prior Kohen. Leviticus Rabbah maintains that God intended to permanently bring forth the priesthood (Kehuna) through Melchizedek's patrilineal descendants, but since Melchizedek preceded Abram's blessing to that of God, God instead chose to bring the priesthood (kehuna) forth from Abram's descendants. As the text states in regard to Melchizedek; "and he is a Kohen" (והוא כהן‎) meaning himself in the exclusive sense and not his patrilineal descendants.

The Ohr HaChayim commentary presents that God was not angered by Melchizedek's preceding Abram's blessing to that of God, since Abram was rightfully deemed worthy of precedence for independently coming to recognize God amidst a world of Paganism, but Melchizedek willingly gave the priesthood to Abram upon recognizing his outstanding uniqueness and godly character traits.

Rabbinic authorities differ as to whether kehuna was given to Abram there and then or after the demise of Melchizedek.

The Midrash records that Shem functioned as kohen gadol (high priest) in that he taught Torah to the Patriarchs before it was publicly given at Mount Sinai, while the official title of High Priest was conferred upon Aaron after the erection of the Tabernacle.

Midrash text

The Midrash quotes multiple aspects of both Melchizedek and Abram; the Rabbis taught that Melchizedek acted as a priest and handed down Adam's robes to Abram (Numbers Rabbah 4:8).

Rabbi Isaac the Babylonian said that Melchizedek was born circumcised (Genesis Rabbah 43:6). Melchizedek called Jerusalem "Salem." (Genesis Rabbah 56:10.) The Rabbis said that Melchizedek instructed Abram in the Torah. (Genesis Rabbah 43:6.) Rabbi Eleazar said that Melchizedek's school was one of three places where the Holy Spirit (Ruach HaKodesh) manifested himself (Babylonian Talmud Makkot 23b).

Rabbi Judah said in Rabbi Nehorai's name that Melchizedek's blessing yielded prosperity for Abram, Isaac, and Jacob (Genesis Rabbah 43:8). Ephraim Miksha'ah the disciple of Rabbi Meir said in the latter's name that Tamar descended from Melchizedek (Genesis Rabbah 85:10).

Rabbi Hana bar Bizna citing Rabbi Simeon Hasida identified Melchizedek as one of the four craftsmen of whom Zechariah wrote in Zechariah 2:3. (Babylonian Talmud Sukkah 52b; see also Song of Songs Rabbah 2:33 (crediting Rabbi Berekiah in the name of Rabbi Isaac).) The Talmud teaches that David wrote the Book of Psalms, including in it the work of the elders, including Melchizedek.

Thus according to Jewish legend, confusion over Melchizedek being both King and Priest is solved by knowing that Shem was also a progenitor of the Davidic Monarchy, which descended from both Judah and Tamar, who was sentenced to 'death by fire' when accused of committing prostitution as the daughter of high priest Shem.

In the Zohar

The Zohar (redacted by Moses de León c. 1290s) finds in "Melchizedek king of Salem" a reference to "the King Who rules with complete sovereignty". or according to another explanation, that "Melchizedek" alludes to the lower world and "king of Salem" to the upper world (Zohar 1:86b–87a). The Zohar's commentary on Genesis 14 cites a Rabbi Yitzchak as saying that it was God who gave tithe to Abram in the form of removing the Hebrew letter He from his throne of glory and presenting it to the soul of Abram for his benefit. The letter he is the letter God added to Abram's name to become "Abra-ha-m" in Genesis.

In Christianity

An image of Melchizedek painted onto the altar side near the Royal Doors at Libotin wooden church, Maramureș County, Romania
Main article: Melchizedek priesthood

In the New Testament, references to Melchizedek appear only in the Epistle to the Hebrews, though these are extensive (Hebrews 5:6, 10; 6:20; 7:1, 10, 11, 15, 17, 21). Jesus Christ is there identified as "a priest forever in the order of Melchizedek", quoting from Psalm 110:4.

Association with the Messiah

The association or identification of Melchizedek with the Messiah predates Christianity, developing in Jewish messianism of the Second Temple period.

A collection of early Gnostic scripts dating on or before the 4th century, discovered in 1945 and known as the Nag Hammadi library, contains a tractate pertaining to Melchizedek. Here it is proposed that Melchizedek is Jesus Christ. Melchizedek, as Jesus Christ, lives, preaches, dies and is resurrected, in a gnostic perspective. The Coming of the Son of God Melchizedek speaks of his return to bring peace, supported by God, and he is a priest-king who dispenses justice.

The association with Christ is made explicit by the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews, where Melchizedek the "king of righteousness" and "king of peace" is explicitly associated with the "eternal priesthood" of the Son of God.

This association between Melchizedek and Jesus is indirectly supported by a quotation attributed directly to Jesus himself in the Gospel of John, in which Jesus obliquely claims to have personally met Abraham: "Abraham your father rejoiced to see my day; he saw it and was glad." (John 8:56.)

The Christological interpretation of this Old Testament character being a prefiguration or prototype of the Christ has varied between Christian denominations. Typological association of Jesus Christ with Old Testament characters occurs frequently in the New Testament and in later Christian writings; thus, Jesus Christ is also associated with Adam (as the "New Adam") and with Abraham. The bread and wine offering of Melchizedek has been interpreted by church fathers including Clement of Alexandria as being a prefiguration of the Eucharist.

The Pelagians saw in Melchizedek merely a man who lived a perfect life.

Liturgical commemoration

Melchizedek is mentioned in the Roman Canon, the First Eucharistic Prayer of the Roman rite of the Catholic Church, and also figures in the current Roman Martyrology as a commemoration on August 26.

He is commemorated in the Eastern Orthodox Church on May 22, and on the "Sunday of the Forefathers" (two Sundays before Christmas). In the Calendar of Saints of the Armenian Apostolic Church Melkisetek (Armenian: Մելքիսեդեք, romanizedMelkisetek) is commemorated as one of the Holy Forefathers on July 26.

Protestantism

Traditional Protestant Christian denominations, following Luther, teach that Melchizedek was a historical figure and an archetype of Christ.

Tremper Longman III notes that a popular understanding of the relationship between Melchizedek and Jesus is that Melchizedek is an Old Testament Christophany – in other words, that Melchizedek is Jesus, or at the very least, is a close resemblance of Jesus.

Latter Day Saint movement

In the Latter Day Saint movement, the Book of Mormon makes reference to Melchizedek in (Alma 13:17–19). According to Encyclopædia Britannica, Joseph Smith, the movement's founder, "appointed his male followers to priesthoods, named for the biblical figures Melchizedek and Aaron, that were overseen by the office of High Priest", incorporating selected practices from the Hebrew Bible. These priesthoods are laid out by Smith in Doctrine and Covenants 107:1–2, 4, 6–10, 14, 17–18, 22, 29, 71, 73, 76, as well as more than twenty additional references in that work.

The largest denomination in the movement, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, states it derives authority to act in God's name through the Melchizedek Priesthood, both from an administrative perspective—performing sacred ordinances—and a ministering capacity. According to the church's summary of the Melchizedek Priesthood, there are but two priesthoods, "the Melchizedek and the Aaronic." And that the Melchizedek is the higher or greater priesthood, "after the order of the Son of God (or Jesus Christ)." According to their doctrine, this priesthood is the priesthood of Jesus Christ himself, i.e. it is his power which he delegates to certain persons as he sees fit by "calling". This power is not directly cited as His power to avoid the frequent repetition of His sacred name. Its offices include elder, high priest, patriarch, seventy, and apostle.

In Islam

Although Melchizedek is not referred to in the Quran, some have identified him with the figure known as the Khidr. In Isma'ilism, Melchizedek (known as Malik as-Salām; lit. 'King of Peace') is believed to have been the one to initiate Abraham into prophethood. An Ismaili treatise dated to the 1300s proclaimed that Melchizedek would return following the resurrection as a righteous judge and reveal the divine mysteries which the prophets have kept secret throughout the centuries.

In modern culture

Melchizedek appears as a character in Paulo Coelho's novel The Alchemist, where he guides the protagonist, Santiago.

Melchisedec is the name of a rat befriended by Sarah Crewe in The Little Princess by Frances Hodgson Burnett.

See also

Notes

  1. /mɛlˈkɪzədɛk/; Biblical Hebrew: מַלְכִּי־צֶדֶק‎, romanized: malkī-ṣeḏeq, 'king of righteousness,' 'my king is righteousness,' or 'my king is Zedek'; also transliterated Melchisedech, Melchisedec, Malkisedek or Malki Tzedek
  2. Ramban, Bereishith chapter 14, opines that the name implies "my king is tzedek", based on the notion that the city of Salem is associated with the attribute of righteousness.
  3. I.e., beginning in a form of talking to the person directly and ending the speech as speaking for the recipient – Meshech Chochma to Bereishit chapter 14.
  4. Based on the text שב לימיני with "Yemini" referring either to King Saul of the tribe of Benjamin (Binyamin) whom David was careful not to overthrow or to the Torah (as per it being referred to as "from his right hand – a fire of religion to them" Deuteronomy)
  5. Albright reads melek shelomo (מלך-שלמו), "of his peace", instead of melek Salem, "king of Jerusalem", brought out bread and wine..."

References

  1. English pronunciation according to the "Book of Mormon Pronunciation Guide" (churchofjesuschrist.org; retrieved 2012-02-25), IPA-ified from «mĕl-kĭz'a-dĭk»
  2. ^ Cargill, Robert R. (2019). Melchizedek, King of Sodom: How Scribes Invented the Biblical Priest-King. Oxford University Press. pp. 12–14. ISBN 978-0-19-094696-8.
  3. Genesis 14:18–20
  4. Targum Yonathan and Targum Yerushalmi to Bereishith 14:18–20. Talmud Bavli to tractate Nedarim 32b et al.
  5. ^ Blenkinsopp, Joseph (2015). Abraham: The Story of a Life. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 56. ISBN 978-0-8028-7287-6.
  6. Strong's Concordance no. 4428 and 6666.
  7. ^ van der Toorn, K.; et al. (1996). Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 560.
  8. Masson, Olivier; Sznycer, Maurice (1972). Recherches sur les Phéniciens à Chypre. Librairie Droz. p. 99.
  9. A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament with an appendix containing the Biblical Aramaic, written by Francis Brown, Samuel Rolles Driver and Charles Augustus Briggs, based on the Hebrew lexicon of Wilhelm Gesenius as translated by Edward Robinson, Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1906, p. 575.
  10. Geoffrey W. Bromiley ed., The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1994, entries Melchizedek, Adoni-zedek
  11. Joshua 10:1–3
  12. The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges at Google Books
  13. Genesis 14:17–24 see below
  14. Genesis 14:18–20
  15. Speiser, E. A. "Genesis. Introduction, translation, and notes" (AB 1; Garden City 1964) p. 105; Von Rad, "Genesis", pp. 170, 174; Noth, Martin. "A History of Pentateuchal Traditions" (Englewood Cliffs 1972) p. 28, n. 84.
  16. Gunkel, Hermann. Genesis (Göttingen 1922) pp. 284–5
  17. Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of World Religions. Encyclopaedia Britannica Publishers, Inc. Staff. 1999. p. 708. ISBN 9780877790440.
  18. Kamal Salibi, The Bible Came from Arabia Jonathan Cape, 1985, chapter 12
  19. Genesis 14:18
  20. Genesis 14:19–20
  21. Genesis 14:22
  22. Della Vida, G. Levi. "El Elyon in Genesis 14:18–20", JBL 63 (1944) pp. 1–9
  23. Fitzmyer, J. A. The Aramaic Inscriptions of Sefire, Revised Edition (Bibor 19A; Rome 1995) pp. 41, 75
  24. Lack, R. "Les origines de Elyon, le Très-Haut, dans la tradition cultuelle d’Israel", CBQ 24 (1962) pp. 44–64
  25. Alter, Robert (2004). The Five Books of Moses. W. W. Norton & Co. p. 70. ISBN 0-393-01955-1. Employment of the verb without a subject, not uncommon in biblical usage, occurs at the end of verse 20, where the Hebrew does not state what the context implies, that it is Abram who gives the tithe.
  26. The Revised English Bible. Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press. 1989. p. 11.
  27. Hayward, C. T. Robert (2010). Targums and the transmission of scripture into Judaism and Christianity. Koninklijke Brill NV. p. 15. Targum Pseudo-Jonathan makes it clear that Abraham paid tithes to Melchizedek, as does the interpretation adopted by Jub. 13.25–27; Josephus Ant. 1.181; Philo Cong. 93, 99; and, of course, the epistle to the Hebrews .
  28. Herczeg, Yisrael Isser Zvi (1995). The Torah: With Rashi's Commentary Translated, Annotated, and Elucidated. Mesorah Publications. p. 140.
  29. Numbers 31:41
  30. Rogatchover Gaon. Tzafnat Paaneach al HaTorah. commentary on Gen. 14
  31. Zohar Chodosh to Bereishit chap. 14 (the Zohar text, however, does not state that a name change to "Abra-ha-m" occurred at this point).
  32. Psalm 110:4
  33. such as the Vulgate, KJV 1611, JPS 1917
  34. Kugel, James L. Traditions of the Bible, pp. 278–9
  35. Targum Yonathan to Psalm 110
  36. Babylonian Talmud to Nedarim, p. 32
  37. zohar vol. 3 p. 53b
  38. Albright, W. F. "Abram the Hebrew: A New Archaeological Interpretation", BASOR 163 (1961) 36–54, esp. 52.
  39. New American Bible (1980), Genesis 14, fn.5
  40. James L. Kugel, Traditions of the Bible, pp. 283–284
  41. Hebrews 5:5–6
  42. Rosh Hashanah 18b
  43. Longenecker, Richard N. (2004). Studies in Hermeneutics, Christology and Discipleship. Sheffield Phoenix Press. ISBN 978-1-905048-05-2. Retrieved 22 November 2024.
  44. Bokedal, Tomas; Jansen, Ludger; Borowski, Michael (21 August 2023). Scripture and Theology: Historical and Systematic Perspectives. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. ISBN 978-3-11-076841-1. Retrieved 22 November 2024.
  45. Walton, John H. (23 February 2015). The Lost World of Adam and Eve: Genesis 2-3 and the Human Origins Debate. InterVarsity Press. ISBN 978-0-8308-9771-1. Retrieved 23 November 2024.
  46. Jutta Leonhardt Jewish worship in Philo of Alexandria 2001 p216 "IIl 82 Philo also identifies Melchizedek with the Logos as priest of God. Thus Melchizedek, Although Philo interprets the Jewish first-fruit offering and quotes the Jewish laws, the general context is still Cain's sacrifice."
  47. Fred L. Horton The Melchizedek Tradition: A Critical Examination of the Sources 2005 p170 "In the Genesis Apocryphon Melchizedek is brought into connection with Jerusalem (as he is later in Josephus), and in Philo Melchizedek is honored as the possessor of an unlearned and untutored priesthood, indeed as a representation"
  48. Harry Alan Hahne (2006). Corruption and Redemption of Creation: the Natural World in Romans 8.19–22 and Jewish Apocalyptic Literature. A&C Black. p. 83. ISBN 0-567-03055-5.
  49. 2 Enoch, Chapters 69–72
  50. Morfill, W R. The Book of the Secrets of Enoch.
  51. Stephen Pelle (2013). "A Preliminary Study of the Historia de Melchisedech in the Latin West". Apocrypha. 24: 60–61. doi:10.1484/j.apocra.1.103498.
  52. Sumner, Paul (February 25, 2010). "Melchizedek: Angel, Man or Messiah?". Hebrew Streams. Retrieved September 9, 2020.
  53. Wise, Abegg, Cook (1996). The Dead Sea Scrolls: a New Translation.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  54. The Melchizedek Tradition: A Critical Examination of the Sources p. 85 Fred L. Horton – 2005 "Interestingly enough, we see that the Genesis Apocryphon offers no unique information about Melchizedek. Josephus gives three items of information not found in the other sources, and Philo four."
  55. Pearson, Birger A. (2003). "Melchizedek in Early Judaism, Christianity and Gnosticism". In Stone, Michael E.; Bergren, Theodore A. (eds.). Biblical Figures Outside the Bible. A&C Black. p. 181. ISBN 978-1-56338-411-0.
  56. Gareth Lee Cockerill, The Epistle to the Hebrews, vol. 29 of The New International Commentary on the New Testament Author, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2012, 298f. (fn. 14).
  57. Willard M. Swartley, Covenant of Peace, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2006, p. 255. Gary Staats, A Christological Commentary on Hebrews (2012), p. 71: " is identifying Melchizedek as a king of righteousness and a king of peace. He thus becomes a beautiful type of Jesus Christ who is also the final King of righteousness and the final King of peace."
  58. "if from a string and until a shoe string" – Bereishith 14:23
  59. Chizkuni to Bereishith 14:18
  60. Genesis 14:21–24
  61. Rashbam to Bereishith 1418
  62. see ohr hachayim to Bereishit 14:18
  63. Machzor Vitry to Pirkei Avoth 4:22
  64. Rashi to genesis 14:17, quoting medrash aggadahauthored by Rabbi Moshe HaDarshan. Medrash Rabbah
  65. ^ seder hadoroth p. 9b.
  66. malbim to genesis chap. 14
  67. Ramban to Bereishith 14:18
  68. Rashi (based on Sifra) to Bereishith 12:6
  69. introduction to Torath HaKohanim (M. Rizikoff)
  70. Genesis 9:27
  71. Maharzav (Rabbi Zev Wolf Einhorn; ?–1862; Lithuania), to Leviticus Rabbah 25:6
  72. Bamidbar 18:7. The Chizkuni to Leviticus reasons that since the kohen father of the household naturally instills in his children the duties of Kehuna from birth and onward making them successful at their Kohanic duties
  73. In Genesis 14:19–20, a precedence not befitting a kohen who is to be of total service to God – Eitz Yosef to Leviticu Rabbah 25:6.
  74. Rabbi Zechariah, quoting Rabbi Ishmael; Leviticus Rabbah 25:6, Babylonian Talmud to Nedarim 32b. Zohar vol. 1 p. 86b.
  75. Ohr HaChayim (Rabbi Chaim ben Attar 1696–1742, Morocco) to Genesis 14:18 (first explanation). Eitz Yosef commentary to Leviticus Rabbah 25:6. Zohar vol. 1 p. 86b
  76. Ohr HaChaim to Bereishith 14:18
  77. Maharzav (Z. V. Einhorn) to Leviticus Rabbah 25:6 (since Abraham's demise preceded Shem's by 35 years)
  78. This latter opinion being of the Eitz Yosef commentary to Vayikra Rabbah 25:6
  79. Zechariah 2:3
  80. (in Psalm 110). (Babylonian Talmud Baba Batra 14b–15a.)
  81. Ginzberg, Louis (1909). The Legends of the Jews Volume III: Judah and His Sons (translated by Henrietta Szold) Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society.
  82. Hebrews 5:6–10; Hebrews 6:20; Hebrews 7:1–21
  83. Psalm 110:4
  84. Hebrews 5:6
  85. Robinson, James M (1978). The Nag Hammadi Library in English.
  86. Text of the tractate: http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/melchiz.html
  87. Gareth Lee Cockerill, "The Epistle to the Hebrews", vol. 29 of The New International Commentary on the New Testament. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2012, 298f. (fn. 14).
  88. Willard M. Swartley, Covenant of Peace, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2006, p. 255.
  89. Gary Staats, A Christological Commentary on Hebrews (2012), p. 71: " is identifying Melchizedek as a king of righteousness and a king of peace. He thus becomes a beautiful type of Jesus Christ who is also the final King of righteousness and the final King of peace."
  90. "John 8 New American Bible".
  91. "Jesus Christ is not only typologically linked with the priestly order of Melchizedek, but fulfills and supersedes Melchizedek's person and role" Willard M. Swartley, Covenant of Peace, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2006, p. 255f.
  92. "Christ, Melchizedek, and the Eucharistic Sacrifice". 3 September 2018.
  93. Philip Edgcumbe Hughes, A Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews, p. 244
  94. Martyrologium Romanum ex Decreto Sacrosancti Concilii Oecumenici Vaticani II instauratum, auctoritate Ioannis Pauli Pp. II promulgatum, editio altera, Typis vaticanis, , p. 476.
  95. May 22/June 4 Archived 2014-08-22 at the Wayback Machine. Orthodox Calendar (Provaslavie.ru).
  96. Luther's works: First lectures on the Psalms II, Psalms 76-126 Martin Luther, Hilton C. Oswald – 1976 "After the order of Melchizedek, which is understood, first, in accordance with the name.  Therefore He is the true Melchizedek. Second, this is understood in accordance with the office, because Melchizedek offered the bread and wine"
  97. Longman, Tremper (2005). How To Read Genesis. InterVarsity Press. p. 172. ISBN 9780830875603.
  98. Alma 13:17–19
  99. Bushman, Richard L. (25 April 2017). "Joseph Smith — American religious leader (1805–1844)". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 30 May 2017. He appointed his male followers to priesthoods, named for the biblical figures Melchizedek and Aaron, that were overseen by the office of High Priest.
  100. Doctrine and Covenants 107:1–2, 4, 6–10, 14, 17–18, 22, 29, 71, 73, 76
  101. Doctrine & Covenants 107:3-4
  102. Melchizedek Priesthood Summary
  103. "WORLD OF FAITH: THE IMAM'S DA'IS AND THE ISMAILI DA'WAH". March 28, 2018. Retrieved November 12, 2018.
  104. Livingstone, David (2002). The Dying God: The Hidden History of Western Civilization. iUniverse. p. 260. ISBN 0595231993.
  105. Muraleedharan, Manju. "Multi-disciplinary dimensions in Paulo Coelho’s Novel The Alchemist." Journal of Literature, Culture and Media Studies 3.5&6 (2012).
  106. Burnett, Frances Hodgson. A Little Princess.

Further reading

External links

Extra-Quranic prophets of Islam
In Stories of the Prophets
In Islamic tradition
In Quranic exegesis
Italics = While the figure has been revered by many Muslims as a saint, status as a prophet is not accepted by all.
Saints of the Catholic Church
Dicastery for the Causes of Saints
Stages of canonization: Servant of God   →   Venerable   →   Blessed   →   Saint
Virgin Mary
Apostles
Archangels
Confessors
Disciples
Doctors of the Church
Evangelists
Church
Fathers
Martyrs
Missionaries
Patriarchs
Popes
Prophets
Virgins
See also
Categories: