Misplaced Pages

User talk:Tony Sidaway: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:37, 6 September 2006 editFriday (talk | contribs)19,776 edits "Chat room buddies": oh, don't be silly← Previous edit Latest revision as of 11:54, 30 May 2024 edit undoGodofincompetence (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users921 edits Notification: proposed deletion of Gradient Analytics.Tag: Twinkle 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{not around|3=8 October 2021}}
]
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-4 Target-User talk:Tony Sidaway/Werdnabot archive--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE-->
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].
{{User:Tony Sidaway/TopNav|username=Tony_Sidaway}}
<!-- {|
|<big><center>'''I'm on a break. This means I will not reply to personal emails or talk page requests. This is okay because we have about 1,000 administrators, any one of whom is quite capable of helping you, including reversing any errors I might have made.''' </center></big>
|} -->
{|
|<big><center>'''This page is archived by ]'''</center></big>
|}
----
{|
|<big><center>'''Sidaway's law of Misplaced Pages:''' Misplaced Pages is cleverer than you are.</center></big>
|}
----
{|
|<big><center>'''Please avoid unusual formatting.'''</center></big>
<big><center>''This is both my user page and my talk page. To find out more about me and what I do, click on the icons in the amazingly cool navigation bar above.</center><center> ''</center></big>
<center>Disclosure of political bias: I took the ] questionnaire on 15 July 2006 and the result was economic left/right: minus 8.13, social libertarian/authoritarian: minus 8.26 </center>
<center><big>Please contact me by email if you are blocked from editing:</big></center>
<center><big>'''minorityreport@bluebottle.com'''</big></center>
|{{Spoken Misplaced Pages|Tony_Sideways.ogg|2006-06-21}}
|]
|}
{{User:Tony Sidaway/Templates/TalkArchiveBar}}
== Cows ==


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Do you like cows? --] 03:17, 5 September 2006 (UTC)


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 03:06, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
== Wikipediatrix ==


== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==
Tony, HELP! I do not know if you notice or not but Wikipediatrix has a very short fuse and seems to rub a lot of people the wrong way. We have articles on here that she has continually gotten involved in. When we have asked her to help us she became very confrontational and even claimed we were editing under different names. It got to the point that other editors were calling her down for her antics. I surely hope that this is not a regular problem that everyone has to deal with in thier dealings with her? She has tagged yet the same article on David L Cook for "cites" We went in and gave what we had. Such as a quote from Bob Hope. That comment was made at a banquet full of comedians and not recorded by television or radio. We have tried to explain these things and she still comes right back and tags everything again. I do not know if this is all she has to do all day but it certainly is very hard to deal with someone who has this kind of agenda. We are not Wiki savy and do not claim to be. We have gone in when we check these things to see if everything is done right and if not we try to fix them. I do not know how to cite the things she is talking about. Most of the things that are said between celebrities or at functions are not things that are citable in our opinion. Could you please help us? We need to get this woman off of our backs! She is very nasty. Thanks Daylon Ware ] 9:14, 2006,25,07 (UTC)


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Tony Sidaway. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
: She's doing a good job. Please see ] and ]. If there is no reliable source for Bob Hope's opinion on David L. Cook, then we can't use it. --] 13:37, 25 July 2006 (UTC)


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
: Ready to archive. --] 21:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
==User:Hagiographer==
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
I have had problems with this user before. Thanks fort getting him to stop altering my user page in unpleasant ways. he has altered my signature to that of another user, ], please can you discourage him from doing so, ] 03:36, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/11&oldid=813413898 -->
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
: Ready to archive. --] 21:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ]. ] 22:33, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
== ] ==


== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==
This arbitration case has closed and the final decision is published at the link above.


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Tony Sidaway. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
] <sup>]</sup> 15:21, 20 August 2006 (UTC)


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
: Ready to archive. --] 21:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
== Never mind the sollogs ==
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
Hi. As you had a clear opinion on its predecessor, I thought you might also have one on ]. (Though of course you're away right now....) -- ] 04:53, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/11&oldid=866998401 -->


== Task force climate change ==
== ArbCom ==


Hello Tony Sidaway,
Sorry for your being pulled into this, but you're named as an involved party. It's. ] (]) 00:14, 22 August 2006 (UTC)


You are currently noted as a participant of the ]. With much of the activity in this task force about ten years ago, I think it's time for a revival. Global warming is getting a lot of attention in the media now and it's therefore important our articles are up-to-date, accurate and neutral.
: Ready to archive. --] 21:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


I've updated the task force page and the to do list and invite you to have a look at the page again, add something to the TO DO list or start collaborating by improving one of our many articles. If climate change has lost your interest, feel free to remove your name from the participants list.
== Clerk duties call. ==


] (]) 16:36, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
You may want to decide to move or at minimum separate it from Ed's statement. ] 02:29, 22 August 2006 (UTC)


== Re: Time I stopped being a curmudgeon about signs of appreciation's barnstar ==
: Ready to archive. --] 21:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


You did THAT to the ''']''' article—in ''2015''?!?!!! That is one ''well deserved'' barnstar, lemme tell you! The nostalgia! My best friend and I were following ''], ], ]'' and other then-'']'' fare of the time, several days a week, so we saw that blow up real-time! Dude, I mean...'''''dude'''''. Dang.
== SqueakBox has to be blocked for, at least a month ==


...
Excuse me, Tony but I believe Squeak Box has to blocked for a month. Instead of respecting his one month ban he created ] to go on editing. It has been demonstrated. Everything is explained in ]. If you're not going to enforce the block, at least explain me why not. Thank you. ] 07:19, 22 August 2006 (UTC)


Thank you for all your hard work, there and elsewhere! Thank you very much! —] (]) 10:33, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
: Ready to archive. --] 21:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


Thanks. I worked hard on several controversial articles for a long time, and I think my work was appreciated. ] is one, ] is another, and there were many others. ] 22:23, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
== SqueakBox's not respecting his ban ==


== How to control global warming listed at ] ==
] hasn't respected his ban after being blocked. The anonymous user 63.245.13.229 has edited SqueakBox's user page to restore the insult by which you blocked him (). SqueakBox has admitted previously that that IP was him (). By the way, the user page still has the insult against me. I believed personal attacks are not allowed in the Misplaced Pages so I think it should be removed. I can't do it myself because ] has protected the page. I suppose he didn't realize what was really going on.
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''How to control global warming'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you wish to do so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> — <span style="font-family:gill sans">]</span> ] 23:56, 8 July 2019 (UTC)


== Moving to inactive ==
In regard to my block and all that, I find it reasonable but, in fact, I'm not very interested in the article. Simply, I didn't understand, and I don't understand, what was the purpose of the absurd redirects so I removed them. In my humble opinion, redirects are used when two titles are valid for the same article. In other cases, redirects are pure vandalism: they don't allow anybody to edit or read an article. As far as I know, the Misplaced Pages prides on its effectiveness at fighting vandalism. If you analyze it, I've only edited a Zapatero related article once, when I removed from the main article the information I thought to be obsolete. All the other times, and they have been only three, I've simply removed the redirects. That is, as far as I know I've removed vandalism. And for that, from my point of view, you've blocked me from editing the articles. I'm not very interested in editing them, only that I find it kind of absurd. Vandalism is a serious threat to the Misplaced Pages, and I'm blocked from editing an article from which I've removed vandalism (in my view). So, I would like you to explain to me (or to tell me where I can find an explanation) if the use of redirects to prevent other users from editing or reading specific articles is vandalism or not. And if it is, why it's been allowed for so long.


Hi, FYI the climate change task force is now a stand-alone project (]). You were once listed as active at the task force but from your contribs it appears you are in (semi?) wiki retirement. I've therefore taken liberty to move your name to the inactive list, but feel free to rejoin us any time! ] (]) 20:40, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
If you think it's vandalism, in my opinion it's pretty clear it is, I think it should be clearly stated as such in the articles where it should be made clear that anybody redirecting the articles without, at least, a previous consensus will be treated as a vandal.


== Hope you're doing well, whatever you're up to ==
Thank you for reading this long message, :-) ] 06:57, 23 August 2006 (UTC)


]
: Ready to archive. --] 21:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


Thanks for the good wishes. I'm largely disengaging from all social forums, as indicated . There's still time for me to reconnect with my solipsistic side, I hope. Only by shutting out ] can I have any peace, which for some reason seems to involve lots of microcontroller stuff and obscure programming languages. --] 13:38, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
== ], redux ==
:If I could find it, I'd send you lyrics to a song where the singer, in first person, places a cell call to someone else, asking if the other party received his email. The conversation goes live into the mens room when the singer walks in on an occupied stall. He wants to talk about techno weenie who piled it all up on a sheet of plywood, doused it with crisco, set it afire, and disappeared into the Rockies leaving only an address at the corner store. But the ironic refrain claims the speaker isn't a victim of the techno world "oops, didn't know the stall was occ-uuuuu-piiiiied....." Good for you, and if you can stand a bit of zombi speak, I have ] (]) 14:28, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
:: I've returned to the coastline between the rivers Tyne and Wear, which I choose to call Mesopotamia for obvious reasons. Nature is very much evident here, where I grew up. I get out onto the coastal walks whenever I can. --] 19:05, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
::: Awesome! I just returned from a forest school outting (classic version) with multiple families. The kiddos turned up many species of mushrooms, saprophytic vascular plants, a tree frog, multiple salamanders, various aquatic creepie crawlies which in our area indicate a stream has high water quality. This made me quite happy since not that long ago that stream had problems. Enjoy your anti digital reawakening! I haven't managed to pull the plug yet, obviously. ] (]) 20:18, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
==] nomination of ]==
]


A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a ], a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
Hi Tony, thought I'd alert you to a new development in the case of this banned user who is now asking for a lifting of the ban under certain conditions. As you took place in the original discussion leading to the ban I thought I should contact you directly about this ]. Thanks, ] 21:44, 24 August 2006 (UTC)


If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 17:32, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
: Ready to archive. --] 21:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


== Gibraltarian == == Username Eligible ==


My username is suitable for Misplaced Pages editing?
Hi Tony Sideway, would it be possible to semiprotect ] and ] pages? Gibraltarian is back as you are surely aware... Thanks, ] 14:21, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
] 14:33, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
: Thanks for asking. I see no problem with your username, though I'm hardly up to date with current practice on Misplaced Pages. If you find the username being challenged, and this makes it difficult to improve Misplaced Pages, I believe you can ask for it to be changed. I'm sure you realise that the purpose of the wiki is to produce a great encyclopedia, it isn't for experiments in what constitutes a valid identifier. --] 22:43, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]


The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
: Ready to archive. --] 21:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
<blockquote>Fails ]. It's all ] information aside from trivial filming location details. It is in no way a justified spin-out.</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
== Aggressive user ==


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
In the course of a challenging edit war around the ] article, one new Misplaced Pages user (]) is employing rather offensive personal attacks on the talk page. There seem to be no neutral participants who can suggest an appropriate tone for the discussion; more precisely, one has, and has been ignored. Can you help? See ].


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 12:25, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
The user also has a tendency to editorialize in the article; the distinction between describing his personal opinions or experiences, on the one hand, and verifiable information, on the other, seems to be unclear to him. The article needs clean-up, and some useful results are coming out of the discussion, but I for one am often uncomfortable with the tone and style.
==Orphaned non-free image File:SuperOffice Logo.png==
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).


Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 04:59, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Hoping you can help in some way! ] 18:42, 27 August 2006 (UTC)


== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message ==
== Insults ==


<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
I inform you administrator about insults .--] 17:39, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.


If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
: Ready to archive. --] 21:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=990307860 -->


== Dear Other Guy == == Userboxes ==
Sorry, i'm not him, but I could introduce if you'd like. We talked once here on Misplaced Pages and i'm sure we've probably met each other before this at one meeting or another. ] 00:22, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


Hey Tony. I made a user box using one of your quotes. ]. ]] 17:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)


== ] of ] ==
: Ready to archive. --] 21:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
]


The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
==Award==
<blockquote>'''Might be some potential for a legitimate article here, but in this case such a poor starting point that we might as well start from scratch.'''</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The da Vinci Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | This award is for your efforts to make Misplaced Pages a better place. ]
|}


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
::This award is also for the Arbitration Committee as well. This is one Wikipedian who is thanking you for doing a often thankless, often resented job. ] 01:46, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 13:02, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
== More Alienus socks ==


== Coordinators and help needed ==
88.198.213.138 I believe is a new Alienus sockpuppet. It has been editing the articles ] and ]. In addition, 81.169.180.248, another Alienus sockpuppet has been editing ] in addition to other articles. Would it be possible to semi-protect the articles that these IP's edit? Thanks. ] 03:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC)


] Hi, if you are active on Misplaced Pages and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large ], please let us know ]. We look forward to hearing from you.<br><hr><small>Sent to project members 13:59, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages ].</small>
Thank you. ] 22:27, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Kudpung@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Schools/Participants_list&oldid=1041253844 -->


== A kitten for you! ==
Alienus is continuing to use anon socks, on articles like ] and ]. Is there a way to have these IP's blocked or these articles protected from anon users, or to have Alienus's ban extended beyond a year? ] 15:52, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


]
: Each time he socks like this, his one-year ban is reset. --] 15:54, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
i love kittens!!111


Ah, thanks. ] 03:22, 5 September 2006 (UTC) ] (]) 17:12, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
<br style="clear: both;"/>
==] nomination of ]==
]
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not ] how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about ].


If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Gradient+Analytics|deleting administrator}}. <!-- Template:Db-notability-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> – ] (]) 06:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Sorry to keep bugging you, but Alienus has a new sockpuppet, 217.10.142.170. ] 18:06, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]


The file ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
== User:Willothewisp ==
<blockquote>'''Unused Misplaced Pages screenshot, no obvious use.'''</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
I came over here a while ago and got a load of spoken articles in stupid voices deleted that had been created by ]. If you like that readout of your user page then that's fine, but can you block him to stop him messing around any longer? Judging by the previous sounds he's contributed, I'm sure you weren't intended to like it, and I think it's just going to carry on with doing articles and making Misplaced Pages look stupid. ] 08:54, 2 September 2006 (UTC)


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
: He hasn't done anything in two months. I think he was just a prankster. The audio of my talk page was, to my mind, obviously intended as a bit of good natured leg-pulling. --] 14:16, 2 September 2006 (UTC)


Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> --]<sup>&laquo;&brvbar;]&brvbar;&raquo;</sup> 14:02, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
== Category:Kilt wearers ==


== A goat for you! ==
Mate I want to know why you think it is an incredibly ridiculous category. We have cateogries on class ring wearers and wikipedians by parenthood. I wonder why you feel the pinch about this one.
] 15:30, 2 September 2006 (UTC)


]
: Those are ridiculous categories, too. What possible relevance can this vomit-inducing nonsense have to the encyclopedia? --] 15:39, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Hope you're doing well Tony.


] (]) 16:09, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
== ] ==
<br style="clear: both;"/>
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 14#Prince Charles}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 14:54, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
==MfD nomination of ]==
] ], a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:Mfd notice --> ]]<sup>]</sup> 22:10, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]


The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
The lead section says 7 is a majority, the motion to close says it's 6. Where did the discreprency come from? - ]|] 20:03, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
<blockquote>'''Has worked as an actor but not had the roles to meet ] / ]. Long-time unref BLP.'''</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
: A bit of ad hocery. Clearly the arbitrators involve are happy that 6-0 is adequate. --] 20:17, 2 September 2006 (UTC)


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
== A Poet's Life ==


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 07:14, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
I reversed you because you, again, closed the AfD early, even after a DRV showed some issue with your early close. Stop doing it, and stop referring to a useless essay. --] <small>]</small> 12:34, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]


The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
: Seems to work for me. --] 19:48, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
<blockquote>'''Notability-- cannot find secondary sources discussing the company'''</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
== Edit ban on ''all'' highway articles? ==


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
Could you please clarify your statement: '''"I hereby ban ''all'' of those involved from editing or moving those articles ''until we have all agreed on a policy''"''' at ]? Some of us have quietly been making constructive edits while this whole ] is taking place. We're not doing moves, we're not edit warring, we're not doing anything that is controversial in any way. We would like to be able to continue making valid contributions to highway articles. Your statement was rather all-inclusive, and its inclusiveness has been questioned. We just want to be sure we're not going to be violating any such ruling. ] 14:15, 3 September 2006 (UTC)


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 11:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
: I misspoke. I meant "from moving." --] 17:51, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
::Thanks for the clarification. — ] <sup>]</sup>•<sub>]</sub> 14:28, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

== Ugly signatures ==

Hi Tony. Quite how ugly does a signature have to be to do you think to justify asking the user to change it? I'm reluctant to push this user too much as we already have a disagreement and he'll think I'm picking on him. Nonetheless I find this signature excessive and I particularly dislike that it contains no mention of the user's actual user name:

: (horrible mess removed)

What do you think? --] 17:49, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

: It's vile. Ask him to change it. --] 17:52, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
::Would you ask him? I've had enough flame and hellfire on my talk page lately, and he doesn't know you... I think your flameproof pants are stronger than mine too :) --] 17:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

== Re: ] ==

The problem we are facing here is that our one person (and I am fairly convinced that is what it is) seems very capable of spoofing his IP or doing whatever else he needs to do to move around usernames/IPs. A block, then, is only marginally useful, and a ban from editing the article could only be enforceable until he finds another IP address... I think the old watchlist is as good a solution as anything else. (])<sup>(])</sup> 05:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

: Possibly. Or just bung it on semiprotection. I won't do that myself because I've edited it. --] 06:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

== Hiya! ==

Hey, I just noticed your name on a tweak of that PZ Myers page. So this is where you've gotten to, deep in the bowels of Misplaced Pages.

: Like a tapeworm. :) --] 19:42, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

==You know what==

Hi,

Screw bureaucracy, sure, but give the issue a day or two, eh? Certainly, more than five hours. Also, at least let somebody who hasn't commented close the thing. Doc and I made peace: why'd you have to go and make my day less calm? :( Best wishes, ] 19:56, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

:Xoloz, I've no desire to breach our peace. Perhaps you are right here. Perhaps, as an involved party, Tony should have left it to another to close. If speedy closing was appropriate, somone else would have done it. However, equally, as the opener of the discussion, perhaps you should not have been the one to reopen it. Perhaps, if it needed re-opening, someone else should have done that? :) Just a thought, --] 20:35, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

::Perhhhhhhaps... but, in my defense, one strong argument in favor of my capacity to reopen is that I ''still'' have no position (formal or otherwise) on this little page. In opening, I did abstain, you know. (As an aside, Doc, if you admit to a "frustration with process" generally, trying to "out-process" a <s>wonk<s> lawyer like me is probably not good for your health!) Also, reopening needs to happen quickly; or else, after a possible DRV, we risking having to "relist" it, which just about nobody really wants, do we now? ] 20:50, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

::::As a very rusty law graduate - and an argumentative old sod, I assure you I'm ''well'' capable of out doing the wonks in wonkery. ;) --] 20:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

::: If you have no position, ''why'' did you undelete the page? --] 20:57, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

::::Because it is very likely that some defenders of the page have not yet had sufficient notice or time to comment. I am preserving for the as-yet-unspoken at least a little window of time in which they might comment. Generally, this is the reason all debates have fixed time-durations of some kind: so the first guy who comes along to "vote" doesn't declare a unanimity of one and close the thing. Opportunity to be heard is key, yes?

::::Besides, although I have no opinion, I have an honest self-interest in debate continuing for a bit. I'm waiting for an answer from Lar. :) ] 21:04, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

:::: The ''key'' is surely getting rubbish like this off the encyclopedia. --] 21:21, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

:: No hassle. I made an honest attempt to kill this silly thing; my conscience is clean. --] 20:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

:::Has your conscience ever been otherwise? ;) ] 20:50, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

== Image deletion ==

Would you mind expanding on , please? All fair use images are copyright infringements (presumably). ] 01:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

: The image is a Getty property and concerns an ongoing news event. In my opinion it exposed Misplaced Pages for copyright infringement that clearly could reduce Getty's income from the image. While it may be possible at some time in the future to use an image like that somewhere on Misplaced Pages, at the time of deletion the image's potential for use had not been adequately justified. --] 02:16, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

:: I agree with Tony. ] 02:24, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

::Thankyou for explaining that. ''That makes sense'' and I have no issue with that. However it's not at all what is expressed in the deletion log, or what was expressed to me on the image page (by others) before it was deleted. And it's frankly not an obvious or set in stone part of WP policy. A note to let me know might have been nice. ] <small>(])</small> 02:38, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

== Protection on ] ==

Tony,

I noticed that you added a semi-protect on ] due to some edit-warring going on, and possible sockpuppetry. The principal user involved, whom I understand you've dealt with in the past, ] appears to be continuing an edit-war campaign for which he's previously been blocked: removing sourced references to Objectivism. In this article, as well as on the ] a number of citations were provided for this individual. He continues to remove the references, often numerous times a day, even after being ] to stop. Please take a look to see what you feel is appropriate. I will refrain from reverting his latest content deletion. Thx, --<font face="Verdana,San-Serif" size="-2"><strong>]<sup>]</sup></strong></font> 03:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

: I may be too involved on this matter--I've really only been addressing what seem to be ban violations by another user on LaszloWalrus' request. I'm also aware that he himself has been prone to tendentious editing and I've blocked him in the past. However I'd rather you took this to ] and ask another administrator to review this. I think this would be fairer to all. --] 12:03, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

:Understood; thank you. --<font face="Verdana,San-Serif" size="-2"><strong>]<sup>]</sup></strong></font> 15:53, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

== ] ==

All the staff were done in the past. Annoying POV pusher , clearly with a hate/angster against hungarians (see the few previous links, i put in). He even had block(s) for this. How/where can I ask for a third view comment? Or ask for banning him from editing articles related to Hungary and Hungarians? The wikipedia's arbitration pages are better then tha maze was in Crete. :S Can't find anything. --] 11:54, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

: Try making an edit on ], or else ask for mediation. You should in early stages be trying to see if you can persuade the user to stop pushing points of view into articles.

: If there are at least two editors who have tried, and failed, to resolve the dispute with this user, then try going to ].

: If all other avenues fail, or seem very likely to fail, come back to ] and read the instructions on how to apply for arbitration.

: If the user is engaged in persistent edit warring, and the problem is rather urgent, make an edit on ] (] for short) and an administrator will take a look and take action if necessary. --] 12:00, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, but it lasts since he regged in. All you mentioned above were all done, since 2003, a ots of times by a lot of users. Guess, the time for an arbitration is here for more than 2 yrs now. Will you help me? I don't know how to do this.--] 12:20, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

: Yes, I'll reformat your application. --] 12:48, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi. As an editor active in the same area as Juro, I feel that I can (and should) provide some evidence against VinceB's claims. Since you filed the RfA for him/her, could you advise me please where I should write my comment to this case? Thanks in advance. ] 15:29, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

: Sure, you're welcome to make a new section on that application called something like "Statement by ]" and add your own signed comments. Keep it brief and to the point; arbitrators don't like to read long submissions. --] 15:41, 5 September 2006 (UTC)


I doubt VinceB used other means how to resolve his personal dispute with Juro (and btw, I failed to find any particular talk page, where the alleged dispute occurred). As far as I know, Juro has never been mentioned at ]. Unfortunately, I was not able to find the archived cases of ], but I do not remember anyone officially asking for the third opinion in this case. I believe that VinceB's request is unnecessary and it would be nice if he provided any evidence that (1) he/she has a dispute with Juro and (2) he/she used other means of dispute resolution before filing his/her request. ] 15:44, 5 September 2006 (UTC)


: I agree that it seems unlikely to be accepted (though I don't make such decisions). If it's rejected, likely the arbitrators will recommend a course of action such as mediation or RfC. --] 18:07, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

==Removal of complaint from Jimbo's talk page==

as I stated on my talk page - who are you to be removing content from people's talk pages? Furthermore resolving the normal way doesn't function with one of the users being an administrator abusing their power and the other a mindless zealot ] 13:18, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

: I don't think you'll get very far on Misplaced Pages with that attitude. --] 13:42, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

== Tony, ==

I think you may have misplaced , of course, I could be wrong. Best, ]] 15:09, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

: Thanks. --] 22:49, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

== Do you still want this? ==

As in, ]? I'm just doing a bit of cleanup over there and thought this was a bit strange (or at least strange to have as a template) :). --] | <sup>]</sup> 22:04, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

It's linked from my userspace. Feel free to move the template to a user subpage; when I wrote it there were good technical reasons to place transcluded pages in template space, but those reasons are long gone. --] 22:48, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

:OK, will do. We've got a billion templates left over from the now-no-longer-on-wikibooks video game guides, so I'm going on a bit of a deletion spree. --]|<sup>]</sup>|<sub>]</sub> 22:55, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

== Your blocks ==

Hi, I decided to write this after I saw your block of ]. You may remember me as one of the editors who your illogical and eventually overturned page block of ]. At that time I was concerned with your reaction to my protests (i.e. that I was being "overly legalistic",) but since the block was overturned after ], I decided to let it go. But now you have executed an unwarranted and egregious block of a prolific contributor. What's more, in your attempt to justify the block you severly twisted the language of Misplaced Pages. To characterize Ghirlandajo's comments as "grossly incivil" is to render those terms meaningless. In a horrifically ironic twist, the comments you were referring to were complaints about the block-prone nature of some admins. To block an editor for that is ] in the truest sense of the word.

You may say that your block was in response to his reaction to your "polite" "cool it down" request. Again, this is a complete misrepresentation of the events. Falsely accusing someone of gross incivility is the opposite of polite. You have said his response was defiant, which it most certainly was. If an admin had "warned" me to stop critizing other admins I would have also reacted with defiance. But the response was certainly not inflammatory, and without a doubt not blockworthy. On the other hand, a 3 hour block is nothing but inflammatory. Since blocks are meant to be preventative I wonder what you were attempting to prevent. If your goal was to get Ghiraldando to stop complaining about eager-to-block admins, do you think this was a good solution?

I am telling you all of this because I feel I must, as your actions have crossed a line. I'm sure nothing will come of this minor dispute, but I want you to know that I will be watching who you block very carefully, and I will not hesitate to call you on blocks I feel are unwarranted. You have stated that you didnt think this block would be harmful. In the future, try to think whether a block will be ''helpful''. Thank you, and feel free to contact me on my talk page for further discussion if you wish. --] 01:08, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

: I didn't block Karl Meier. This fellow Ghirlandajo doesn't get a free pass for being grossly uncivil to other editors, compounding it by repeating the incivility to someone with whom he has a disagreement, and making numerous false accusations.


: A three-hour block gave Ghirlandajo the opportunity to recognise that he had gone far beyond what is acceptable discourse on Misplaced Pages. He did not take it. --] 01:18, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

::OK, it wasn't an illogical block, it was an illogical ban, sorry for the incorrect terminology. As for the rest of your comment, your continued use of incorrect characterizations ("grossly uncivil", "numerous false accusations", "far beyond what is acceptable discourse") demonstrates that you have not considered any of my arguments. This inability to admit fallibility is yet another concern.--] 01:37, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

::: For more on the ban, see comments by different arbitrators on ]. On the subject of fallibility, see my own comments and responses on that same thread, started by me.

::: I stand by my characterizations of Ghirlandajo's unacceptable conduct and believe that, if ]'s application for arbitration is accepted, they will be confirmed by the arbitration committee and he will be prevented from continuing to damage the atmosphere of Misplaced Pages further by such conduct. --] 01:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
::::Upon rereading of my own comments I realized they may appear overly confrontational. Please don't misunderstand me, I have nothing against you as a person and I'm sure you are an invaluable asset to the encyclopedia. It's just that I have seen a lot of what I consider unjustifiable blocks lately, and not a lot of opposition, and I felt I needed to say something. Although I continue to strongly disagree with you about the nature of Ghirla's comments and the ensuing block, I appreciate your reply. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 02:07, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

==Road trip==
Hello Tony :-) Letting you know that I will be out of town through Sunday. Tried to help clear some cases before I left. Will be on the road all Wednesday so not likely to check in. After that I will check in at least once daily and will close or open cases if needed. Have you seen any problems with my clerking? If so, please let me know. Take care, ] 02:33, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

: You're doing a great job. Have a safe trip. --] 02:35, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

==Chaldeans==
Hi, you might wanna look at this ]. They try to get by it, but this is the real page; ]. ] 04:38, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

== "Chat room buddies" ==

Replying here as I didn't see that it was relevant to ]. Not sure why anyone would find this offensive or ugly or whatever. Chat rooms are everywhere. People talk to their buddies in them quite frequently. I see nothing offensive about this. I think you're overly sensitive to things being "ugly". ] ] 15:16, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

: Where is the chatroom? When does Carnildo visit it? These are simple enough questions. If there isn't such a chatroom (and I'm not aware of one) then what you were doing sounds like a very, very ugly thing indeed. Maybe there's an innocent explanation. What is the chatroom called? --] 15:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
::Now you're just being silly. I don't see that the project is helped by us sniping at each other, so I see no useful purpose to continuing along these lines. ] ] 15:37, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:54, 30 May 2024

This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Tony Sidaway has not edited Misplaced Pages since 8 October 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Nomination of OpenBSD security features for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OpenBSD security features is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/OpenBSD security features until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tonystewart14 (talk) 03:06, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tony Sidaway. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Joycelyn O'Brien for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joycelyn O'Brien is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Joycelyn O'Brien until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. soetermans. 22:33, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tony Sidaway. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Task force climate change

Hello Tony Sidaway,

You are currently noted as a participant of the Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Environment/Climate change task force. With much of the activity in this task force about ten years ago, I think it's time for a revival. Global warming is getting a lot of attention in the media now and it's therefore important our articles are up-to-date, accurate and neutral.

I've updated the task force page and the to do list and invite you to have a look at the page again, add something to the TO DO list or start collaborating by improving one of our many articles. If climate change has lost your interest, feel free to remove your name from the participants list.

Femke Nijsse (talk) 16:36, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Re: Time I stopped being a curmudgeon about signs of appreciation's barnstar

You did THAT to the Gamergate article—in 2015?!?!!! That is one well deserved barnstar, lemme tell you! The nostalgia! My best friend and I were following The Jimquisition, Unskippable, Zero Punctuation and other then-The Escapist fare of the time, several days a week, so we saw that blow up real-time! Dude, I mean...dude. Dang.

...

Thank you for all your hard work, there and elsewhere! Thank you very much! —Geekdiva (talk) 10:33, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. I worked hard on several controversial articles for a long time, and I think my work was appreciated. Global warming is one, Gamergate controversy is another, and there were many others. TS 22:23, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

How to control global warming listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect How to control global warming. Since you had some involvement with the How to control global warming redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 23:56, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Moving to inactive

Hi, FYI the climate change task force is now a stand-alone project (WP:WikiProject Climate change). You were once listed as active at the task force but from your contribs it appears you are in (semi?) wiki retirement. I've therefore taken liberty to move your name to the inactive list, but feel free to rejoin us any time! NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 20:40, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Hope you're doing well, whatever you're up to

Thanks for the good wishes. I'm largely disengaging from all social forums, as indicated here . There's still time for me to reconnect with my solipsistic side, I hope. Only by shutting out all you zombies can I have any peace, which for some reason seems to involve lots of microcontroller stuff and obscure programming languages. --TS 13:38, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

If I could find it, I'd send you lyrics to a song where the singer, in first person, places a cell call to someone else, asking if the other party received his email. The conversation goes live into the mens room when the singer walks in on an occupied stall. He wants to talk about techno weenie who piled it all up on a sheet of plywood, doused it with crisco, set it afire, and disappeared into the Rockies leaving only an address at the corner store. But the ironic refrain claims the speaker isn't a victim of the techno world "oops, didn't know the stall was occ-uuuuu-piiiiied....." Good for you, and if you can stand a bit of zombi speak, I have just what the doctor ordered NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 14:28, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
I've returned to the coastline between the rivers Tyne and Wear, which I choose to call Mesopotamia for obvious reasons. Nature is very much evident here, where I grew up. I get out onto the coastal walks whenever I can. --TS 19:05, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Awesome! I just returned from a forest school outting (classic version) with multiple families. The kiddos turned up many species of mushrooms, saprophytic vascular plants, a tree frog, multiple salamanders, various aquatic creepie crawlies which in our area indicate a stream has high water quality. This made me quite happy since not that long ago that stream had problems. Enjoy your anti digital reawakening! I haven't managed to pull the plug yet, obviously. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 20:18, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Triassic turtles

A tag has been placed on Category:Triassic turtles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Liz 17:32, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Username Eligible

My username is suitable for Misplaced Pages editing? User:WeTalkWiki 14:33, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for asking. I see no problem with your username, though I'm hardly up to date with current practice on Misplaced Pages. If you find the username being challenged, and this makes it difficult to improve Misplaced Pages, I believe you can ask for it to be changed. I'm sure you realise that the purpose of the wiki is to produce a great encyclopedia, it isn't for experiments in what constitutes a valid identifier. --TS 22:43, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of locations in Pirates of the Caribbean

Notice

The article List of locations in Pirates of the Caribbean has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:LISTN. It's all WP:PLOT information aside from trivial filming location details. It is in no way a justified spin-out.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 12:25, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SuperOffice Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SuperOffice Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:59, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Userboxes

Hey Tony. I made a user box using one of your quotes. User:Slightsmile/Userboxes/wikilawyering. SlightSmile 17:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kronstadt mutinies

Notice

The article Kronstadt mutinies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Might be some potential for a legitimate article here, but in this case such a poor starting point that we might as well start from scratch.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PatGallacher (talk) 13:02, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Coordinators and help needed

Hi, if you are active on Misplaced Pages and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you.


Sent to project members 13:59, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.

A kitten for you!

i love kittens!!111

Namehumor (talk) 17:12, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gradient Analytics

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gradient Analytics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – S. Rich (talk) 06:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Svedeesh Cheff.png

Notice

The file File:Svedeesh Cheff.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused Misplaced Pages screenshot, no obvious use.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax 14:02, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

A goat for you!

Hope you're doing well Tony.

Herostratus (talk) 16:09, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

"Prince Charles" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Prince Charles has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 14 § Prince Charles until a consensus is reached. Векочел (talk) 14:54, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Talk:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 1/Old cast list with references

Talk:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 1/Old cast list with references, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 1/Old cast list with references and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 1/Old cast list with references during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. HouseBlaster 22:10, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joseph Long (actor)

Notice

The article Joseph Long (actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has worked as an actor but not had the roles to meet WP:ENT / WP:GNG. Long-time unref BLP.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 07:14, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gradient Analytics

Notice

The article Gradient Analytics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability-- cannot find secondary sources discussing the company

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Queenofconfusion (talk) 11:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Categories: