Revision as of 05:15, 2 October 2016 editFlyer22 Frozen (talk | contribs)365,630 editsm →30 September 2016: Behavioral evidence thus far.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:12, 26 November 2020 edit undoRoySmith (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators92,217 edits Archiving case section to w:en:Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Sarsaparilla/Archive (using spihelper.js)Tags: Replaced Manual revert | ||
(143 intermediate revisions by 31 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{SPIarchive notice|Sarsaparilla}} | {{SPIarchive notice|Sarsaparilla}} | ||
{{SPIpriorcases}} | {{SPIpriorcases}} | ||
===30 September 2016=== | |||
{{SPI case status|checked}} | |||
====Suspected sockpuppets==== | |||
* {{checkuser|1=Markshale}} | |||
<!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts--> | |||
* <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small> | |||
* | |||
It seems odd to start an official sock investigation on this editor, considering that he has been blocked so many times by ], ] or the ] without one (]), but I'm going ahead and reporting him in case Alison is busy or doesn't want to take on this case. While almost starting an official case on him today under the Tisane title, I was reminded (when looking at past evidence) that I started a case on him in 2015 under the Sarsaparilla name. | |||
Anyway, I the following on my talk page: | |||
I am 100% certain that Markshale is {{User|Tisane}}/Sarsaparilla. I would rather not divulge these easy ways to recognize Tisane here out in the open since he will likely try to change his editing style afterward, but the following is how I know that Markshale is Tisane.... | |||
*For one, we know that Tisane is interested in law topics and child sexual abuse topics. The first few edits by Markshale show that he is as well; see , and . | |||
*Tisane has a habit of signing his edit summaries with a dash. This is seen , , , and . | |||
**Tisane did the same as {{User|Yev Yev}}. See . | |||
**He's doing the same as Markshale. See , and . | |||
*Now while some other editors have signed their edit summaries with a dash, Tisane does something that I don't think I've seen any other editor consistently do... He has a unique habit of adding an asterisk (*) to his edit summary when adding something to the See also section or when making a similar edit. See , , and for examples. | |||
**He did the same as Yev Yev. See , , , and . | |||
**He's doing the same as Markshale, as seen , , , | |||
*What led me to immediately recognize Markshale as Tisane is that after that Tisane, while editing as Yev Yev, created the ] article a month after I kind of opposed it, I saw that Markshale the ] article '''Coincidence? I think not.''' Tisane does stuff like this, keep track of my edits and then goes against them by creating an article or similar, because he feels that I'm not doing all of what needs to be done for sexual topics. That (in my own words) I have gotten lazy. He's stated this on my talk page. Of course, laziness is not what has me and others disagreeing with a lot of Tisane's edits. | |||
Now '''because the Sarsaparilla and Tisane accounts are stale''', you will need to compare the Markshale account to one of Tisane's more recent socks. {{User|Beembly}}, {{User|Valuable content creator}}, {{User|Zenitnaya}} and {{User|Hitotsume}} are recent ones...in that order. Even if the checkuser data does not connect Markshale to these accounts, I assure you that Markshale is Tisane. ] (]) 15:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
{{Outdent}} | |||
], what other accounts did you compare Markshale to? And can we leave this case open long enough to have ] or the WP:WMF weigh in? I'll contact Alison on her talk page, making my case, and I'll have the WP:WMF contacted via email. I'm not sure how Tisane beat the checkuser tool this time, but going by checkuser evidence is not the be all and end all for sock investigations. Behavioral evidence should also be a factor. See ]; it is a cautionary tale about relying solely on checkuser evidence. That editor managed to beat the checkuser data. It took me compiling a lot of behavioral evidence just to get that editor blocked. He was free for a year to roam with destructive edits. '''The behavioral evidence for Tisane/Markshale is here''', especially his consistent use of an asterisk (*) for his edit summary when adding something to the See also section. I ask editors: How many other editors have they seen do that, or consistently do that? More examples are , and . In addition to what I stated above, Markshale is also preoccupied with redirects, just like Tisane was. See , , and for examples. At ], ], for example, noted Tisane's preoccupation with redirects. ] (]) 04:20, 2 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
''' Behavioral evidence so far''' | |||
* Markshale, like Tisane, is interested in child sexual abuse and law topics. | |||
* Markshale, like Tisane, has a habit of signing his edit summaries with a dash. | |||
* Markshale, like Tisane, consistently uses an asterisk (*) for his edit summary when adding something to the See also section. Have you seen any other Misplaced Pages editor do that, or consistently do that? | |||
* Markshale, like Tisane, is preoccupied with redirects. | |||
* Markshale, like Tisane, created an article for a sexual topic two months after I opposed the creation. | |||
Those are not coincidences. ] (]) 05:14, 2 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== | |||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | |||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== | |||
Markshale is {{unrelated}} to, for example, Hitotsume--] (]) 23:55, 1 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
Latest revision as of 01:12, 26 November 2020
Sarsaparilla
Sarsaparilla (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Sarsaparilla/Archive.
Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user: