| Revision as of 17:36, 13 November 2004 editRrjanbiah (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,055 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 18:05, 7 November 2024 edit undo223.178.212.117 (talk) →padma not cover in this: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic |
| (379 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1= |
|
==Common spellings== |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject India |importance=Top |karnataka=yes |karnataka-importance=High |tamilnadu=yes |tamilnadu-importance=Top}} |
|
Here is a result of Google searches for common misspellings of the name. This will be useful if in future there's a debate on whether this article needs to be redirected to any other spelling. Also if any other titles need to be redirected to this article. Search done on Aug 6. ] 16:46, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Dance|importance=High}} |
|
<table> |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Hinduism|importance=Mid}} |
|
<tr><td>"bharata natyam" <td align="right"> 20,100 |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Visual arts }} |
|
<tr><td> bharatanatyam <td align="right"> 17,300 |
|
|
|
}} |
|
<tr><td> bharathanatyam <td align="right"> 8,520 |
|
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
<tr><td> bharatnatyam <td align="right"> 7,280 |
|
|
|
|archiveheader = {{Aan}} |
|
<tr><td>"bharat natyam" <td align="right"> 3,700 |
|
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 500K |
|
<tr><td>"bharatha natyam" <td align="right"> 3,210 |
|
|
|
|counter = 1 |
|
<tr><td> bharathnatyam <td align="right"> 428 |
|
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 0 |
|
<tr><td>"bharata nathyam" <td align="right"> 94 |
|
|
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
<tr><td>"bharath natyam" <td align="right"> 89 |
|
|
|
|algo = old(90d) |
|
<tr><td>"bharatha nathyam" <td align="right"> 38 |
|
|
|
|archive = Talk:Bharatanatyam/Archive %(counter)d |
|
<tr><td>"bharat nathyam" <td align="right"> 19 |
|
|
|
}} |
|
<tr><td> bharatanathyam <td align="right"> 14 |
|
|
|
{{Archive box|search=yes|auto=yes}} |
|
<tr><td> bharathanathyam <td align="right"> 5 |
|
|
<tr><td> bharatnathyam <td align="right"> 4 |
|
|
</table> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== padma not cover in this == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
padma not cover in this ] (]) 18:05, 7 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
---- |
|
|
Yahoo search for |
|
|
<table> |
|
|
<tr><td> bharatnatyam <td align="right"> 54,600 |
|
|
<tr><td> "bharata natyam" <td align="right"> 35,600 |
|
|
<tr><td> bharatanatyam <td align="right"> 33,300 |
|
|
<tr><td> bharathanatyam <td align="right"> 26,400 |
|
|
</table> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Medha Hari == |
|
|
|
|
|
Never heard of this name. Also, why this ugly/advertising image is added here? --] 09:55, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Dear Rrjanbiah, |
|
|
:You need to learn more about the contemporary Bharatanatyam. And the picture is not at all ugly. -- 10:10, 8 Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
But, it definitely looks like a ]. The content of the articles and the pages linked to it seems to confirm that. --] 07:13, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== From Tamil Nadu? == |
|
|
|
|
|
Is Bharatanatyam orginated from Tamil Nadu? Someone at ] added so. --] 10:01, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Dear Rrjanbiah, |
|
|
:It appears that you are not familiar with Bharatanatyam at all - 10:07, 8 Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
AFAIK, Bharathanatyam is a Telugu devadasi dance which was commercialized by brahmins like Rukmani Devi. But, neither this article nor any other artcile seems to say that it is Tamilians' dance. --] 07:28, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
---- |
|
|
Partisan advertisement and promotional campaign on behalf of medha hari is clearly visible by the link and image of medha hari being put up on the page. In order that neutrality is attained such partisan publicity should not be overlooked. Is wikipedia an advertising platform ? ] 11:37, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
For Rrjanbiah: you are Telugu, aren't you? - there is no place for nationalism on Misplaced Pages |
|
|
|
|
|
For Water Fish: |
|
|
I do not perceive adding relevant content as SPAM. |
|
|
External links are supported for enriching elements (such as the multimedia content). |
|
|
Before deleting anything, you better think of the benefit of the reader: will the photo be a valuable illustration? Will external links be a valuable extention of Misplaced Pages? --] |
|
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
