Misplaced Pages

Talk:Vicente Fox: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:08, 8 September 2006 editGreen caterpillar (talk | contribs)3,262 edits ganom← Previous edit Latest revision as of 07:01, 20 October 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,238,979 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. The article is listed in the level 5 page: Mexico.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion 
(561 intermediate revisions by 66 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Article history
{{WPBiography|living=yes|class=B|importance=}}
|action1=GAN
{{GAnom}}
|action1date=9 September 2006
|action1result=not listed
|action1oldid=74792893
|currentstatus=FGAN
|otd1date=2011-07-02|otd1oldid=437402243
|otd2date=2014-07-02|otd2oldid=615160072
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=B|vital=yes|listas=Fox, Vicente|1=
{{WikiProject Biography|politician-priority=mid|politician-work-group=yes}}
{{WikiProject Conservatism|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Mexico|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=high}}
}}
{{todo}}


{{Archive box|search=yes|
== NPOV dispute over section on Fox's racist comments ==
* ] <small>(Feb 2005–April 2007)</small>
Even though Fox's comments vis-a-vis African Americans are considered racist by most people's standards, including my own, I find that, in keeping with NPOV, it would be better if the article were amended to include a more neutral reference to his comments, calling them "allegedly racist" or instead stating that there was a "controversy over comments he made about African Americans" rather than outright accusing him of Racism. A small issue, but, I think that calling someone racist, even if they appear to be racist, is not NPOV and should thusly be avoided in a neutral encyclopedia. In my view, references to Fox's comments should only state that there was a controversy over what he said, quote what he said, and mention that "some consider it racist". The article itself should not call him racist; that should be left to the reader's own judgement. --] 04:05, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
* ] <small>(April 2007–June 2008)</small>
}}
__TOC__
{{Clear}}


== Fox's "racism"== == 20th Century Fox ==
I think someone should include a portion about Fox's racism.


Is his family behind the movie studios? ] (]) 23:36, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
:Nobody know's if there is such, but the events that have lead some people to believe he is, have been written about in the article. (to sign posts type <nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki> --] 23:31, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
:Very unlikely. --] (]) 02:47, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
==File:Fox in nature.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion==
{|
|-
| ]
| An image used in this article, ], has been nominated for speedy deletion at ] for the following reason: ''Copyright violations''
;What should I do?
|-
|
| Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Misplaced Pages, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (] has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.


''This notification is provided by a Bot'' --] (]) 06:46, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
|}


==Presidency==
I added some information concerning his alleged racist comments concernign African Americans and of Reverand ] requesting a formal apology. ] 22:02, 29 December 2005 (UTC)


This section talks about his public persona, and then quotes one historian that only condemns his presidency. I don't know a lot about Mexican politics, but my Mexican friends seem to love Fox, so he must have done something good (housing?). This section says nothing of his specific policies - it just says he was inept - it seems biased and not very detailed. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:14, 11 June 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I corrected spelling errors in this section (It's spelled "Rever'''e'''nd", with an "e"). --] 03:59, 13 January 2006 (UTC)


==Post-Presidential Discussion of the War on Drugs==
== Quotes section ==


I suggest the addition of the following text.
Since the quotes section only contained the quote Fox made that was considered racist, I moved that quote to the 'racist' section since it fits better there. Singling it out as the only quote in the entire quotes section is a violation of NPOV. --] 04:08, 13 January 2006 (UTC)


Former Mexican President Vicente Fox said that "making drug consumption legal in the ] would lessen its use and take the illegal stream of money away from the criminal cartels."<ref>{{cite web|last=EPATKO|first=LARISA|title=Mexico's Former President Vicente Fox Joins Calls to Legalize Drugs|url=http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2012/07/vicente-fox.html|publisher=Public Broadcasting Service|accessdate=7/18/2012|author=LARISA EPATKO|language=English|year=2012}}</ref> He used Holland and Portugal as two examples for the successful implementation of this policy.<ref>{{cite web|last=EPATKO|first=LARISA|title=Mexico's Former President Vicente Fox Joins Calls to Legalize Drugs|url=http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2012/07/vicente-fox.html|publisher=Public Broadcasting Service|accessdate=7/18/2012|author=LARISA EPATKO|language=English|year=2012}}</ref>
== I wish i could be president ==
I mean seriously.. if I could be born to a wealthy family, i sure as hell know I wouldn't be driving a cocacola truck. But if that lands me the job as president as the united states......--] 23:52, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)


<references />


Let us disscuss. My best regards, ] (]) 18:39, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
to this article should be useful to mention that many Mexicans see Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador as a Hugo Chavez II, some one that thinks "mobs gives rights" and that politicians should be over the law, a populist, a demagogue.


== How many is many? == == External links modified ==


Hello fellow Wikipedians,
It is clear for me that the person who wrote the paragraph above belongs to those mexicans he/she refers. I think that refering to Mr. Lopez Obrador as Hugo Chavez is only a way to demonize him.


I have just added archive links to {{plural:12|one external link|12 external links}} on ]. Please take a moment to review . If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
It should be useful to mention that Mr. Lopez Obrador is the polititian with most popularity in Mexico, this is shown by poll results before the publication this comment. Mr. Lopez Obrador was the only mexican mayor finalist in the Wolrd Mayor Constest in 2004 . He is also nominated for year 2005 . (correction, he is the most popular in central Mexico; he holds no populartiuy in the north or south, or even in EdoMex.
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120918011100/http://www.un.int/mexico/biography_fox.htm to http://www.un.int/Mexico/biography_Fox.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091002171435/http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-65306555.html to http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-65306555.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130314230438/http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/mexico-murders/ to http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/mexico-murders/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071012115932/http://www.dallasnews.com:80/sharedcontent/dws/ent/stories/DN-peppard_0429gl.ART.State.Bulldog.43489d9.html to http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/ent/stories/DN-peppard_0429gl.ART.State.Bulldog.43489d9.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111125050500/http://www.telemundo52.com/noticias/14359845/detail.html to http://www.telemundo52.com/noticias/14359845/detail.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080616114715/http://www.laopinion.com:80/primerapagina/?rkey=00000000000002503550 to http://www.laopinion.com/primerapagina/?rkey=00000000000002503550
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070928031934/http://centrofox.org.mx/cebm_c070413_1.html to http://centrofox.org.mx/cebm_c070413_1.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070929111835/http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/metro/stories/MYSA040107.24A.Fox_today.3698155.html to http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/metro/stories/MYSA040107.24A.Fox_today.3698155.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071012172153/http://centrofox.org.mx:80/cebm_c070129.html to http://centrofox.org.mx/cebm_c070129.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070928031934/http://centrofox.org.mx/cebm_c070413_1.html to http://centrofox.org.mx/cebm_c070413_1.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120310103937/http://www.cdi-idc.org/news/newsdetail.php?hoofdmenuID=4&newsID=15&submenuID=49&PHPSESSID=809252cb4f10b72aeb8bcc2da4450cdd to http://www.cdi-idc.org/news/newsdetail.php?hoofdmenuID=4&newsID=15&submenuID=49&PHPSESSID=809252cb4f10b72aeb8bcc2da4450cdd
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120222122448/http://www.laprensalatina.com/?p=579 to http://www.laprensalatina.com/?p=579


When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know.
I confess that I will vote for Mr. Lopez Obrador, in case he becomes candidate.


{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}
Mexico is a democracy, and people can prefer the polititician they want, although the candidate belongs to a left or conservative party. The latter was the case of Vicente Fox. Mexican people is dissapointed, so the results of the preference will be shown in the elections in 2006. Mexican people have the right to elect the politician they prefer and to have a left goverment. Will they be dissapointed? Fortunately Mexican people can express their preference in the next elections and vote for another candidate.


Cheers. —]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">]:Online</sub></small> 22:15, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
---------------------------------


== External links modified ==
That is also your POV. Articles should remain neutral. Also why was the president order number removed? It took me a lot of time to put it under every mexican president. -Alan MB


Hello fellow Wikipedians,
:I removed those, a few months ago, when the template was changed. It's not something we do with our presidents -- particularly with the various periods of anarchy / invasion /civil war in the 19th century, when numbering them 1-2-3 gives an inappropriate idea of continuity. Maybe there could be a case for numbering those who've held sequential office under the 1917 Constitution, since Carranza, although that's not something you see very often either. Would you care to discuss it? ] 13:44, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)


I have just added archive links to {{plural:6|one external link|6 external links}} on ]. Please take a moment to review . If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
:: Hajor is right -numbering our presidents is a really strange idea. I don´t think Fox himself knows or cares which President he is. If you have a numbered list, perhaps it could be used in its own article (lists of mexican presidents) or something related to history. ] 03:55, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070930041712/http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/ent/stories/DN-peppard_0429gl.ART.State.Bulldog.43489d9.html to http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/ent/stories/DN-peppard_0429gl.ART.State.Bulldog.43489d9.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110716203534/http://www.telemundo52.com/noticias/14359845/detail.html to http://www.telemundo52.com/noticias/14359845/detail.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071022084351/http://www.laopinion.com/primerapagina/?rkey=00000000000002503550 to http://www.laopinion.com/primerapagina/?rkey=00000000000002503550
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070929111835/http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/metro/stories/MYSA040107.24A.Fox_today.3698155.html to http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/metro/stories/MYSA040107.24A.Fox_today.3698155.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110725151403/http://www.cdi-idc.org/news/newsdetail.php?hoofdmenuID=4&newsID=15&submenuID=49&PHPSESSID=809252cb4f10b72aeb8bcc2da4450cdd to http://www.cdi-idc.org/news/newsdetail.php?hoofdmenuID=4&newsID=15&submenuID=49&PHPSESSID=809252cb4f10b72aeb8bcc2da4450cdd
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080604102336/http://www.laprensalatina.com:80/?p=579 to http://www.laprensalatina.com/?p=579


When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).
==POV==


{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}
This article is absolutely riddled with POV statements. Does anyone want to take a crack at making it less POV?


Cheers.—]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">]:Online</sub></small> 16:04, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
: The previous paragraph was written anonymously; it seems it was ] who added a NPOV template to the article. Since there isn't an specific issue with Fox or the article currently discussed (not that it couldn't) I removed it; policy suggests there should be an ongoing discussion (or at least a previous list of specific issues) before such a template is used. ] 03:32, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::It doesn't take much to point out the POV statements. "After an aggressive campaign, full of now self accepted demagogic promises and statements" "In a country ruled for 70 years by the same party, often subordinated to the president, change needed more than politic skill and diplomacy, and Fox had little of both." "stating that they caused Mexico 72 'lost years of development' (referring, inaccurately, to the time they held the presidency)" (clearly malicious). "Always a promoter of gender-equality in his speeches, addressing the audience as 'mexicanos and mexicanas', Fox's legal and extended cabinet is formed by 53 people, only four of whom are women." It seems like nothing but potshot after potshot. Imagine if the Bush article was riddled with nothing but attacks on his rhetoric and conservatism. magicOgre 20:45, 7 November 2005 (UTC)


== Criticism of Donald Trump ==
:: Solving POV would take a lot of work. However, Fox is a controversial president, particularly by his unique position of being the first oppposition president in 70 years, and Mexico having three strong political parties. I am actually quite surprised this article is not more POVed. Reaching a consensus of his legacy will be difficult because reality can be interpreted in many ways, particularly in such a complex country such as Mexico:


I want to expand the section about Fox's criticism of ] in the "post-presidency" section, but apparently my edits are rigorously shitty and not good enough for Misplaced Pages, and keep getting reverted. This is the information I want to add to the section:<br>
::- How to measure poverty reduction?
1. Fox has emerged as a staunch and vocal critic of Donald Trump because of Trump's comments about Mexico and Mexicans. <br>
::- Is the Mexican Foreign Policy good or bad? (he changed 70 years of foreign policy doctrine making it more active, this is despised by some, and loved by some other... how to judge it objectively if he is still president and the full spectrum of results are not here yet?)
2. Fox apologized to Trump for the strong language he used when denouncing Trump's border wall proposal, while standing by his criticism of the proposal itself and calling on Trump to apologize for his comments about Mexicans being "rapists". <br>
::- How to validate what is written in the article? Most wikipedia articles just use sourcing. However, sourcing Mexican newspapers is not a good way to validate what is written because most Mexican papers are themselves biased (particularly La Jornada, and Excelsior). Is there any other way?
3. Fox has personally invited Donald Trump to visit Mexico with him. <br>
4. Despite his apology, Fox continues to constantly criticize Trump to the international media, most notably on Twitter, where he alternates between trolling Trump and responding to his rhetoric. (Just about every tweet Fox makes is about or directed at Trump, and has earned recognition from the media multiple times). <br>
5. Fox has personally vowed to end Trump's political career and has stated, "I intend to be Donald Trump's shadow until he leaves politics." <br>


Can you all help me add this information to the article in a way so it won't get reverted within five seconds of me adding it? ] (]) 01:32, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
::As you can see, this article has a lot of problems, not only in its content, but also in the ability of wikipedians to elevate his quality. However, doing it is necessary. Vicente Fox is a historical figure, and supporters and detractors alike agree that his actions are and will be greatly influential in the 11th most populated country of the planet (Mexico) (] 18:03, 7 May 2006 (UTC))


== Expropriation of local groundwater in Chiapas Mexico ==
== Infobox ==
Can we please, please modify (or simply get rid of) the dreadful infobox giving the category "Nationality:Not American"? This is absurd and offensive. -- ] 11:13, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)


The following content has been removed twice when I tried to add it to this article under ]. I want to continue the discussion of this content, because it is important content and should be included somewhere, though perhaps in a different location or article? Here is the content I wrote that was deleted:
==President No. nn==
Opinions, please, regarding the inclusion of the presidential "order" number on ]. Tnx. ] 6 July 2005 02:03 (UTC)


'''Fox was also largely responsible for Coca Cola's expropriation of local groundwater in Chiapas, Mexico "by allowing unlimited extraction of deep water resources" that obstructed access to local groundwater and increased consumption of soda<ref>{{cite journal|last=Nash|first=June|date=November 2007 |title=CONSUMING INTERESTS: Water, Rum, and Coca-Cola from Ritual Propitiation to Corporate Expropriation in Highland Chiapas|url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1525/can.2007.22.4.621/full|journal=Cultural Anthropology|volume=22|issue=4|pages=621–639|doi=10.1525/can.2007.22.4.621|access-date=25 July 2016}}</ref>, which contributed to Mexico's diabetes epidemic, currently the nation's leading cause of death.<ref>{{cite news|last=Rosenberg|first=Tina|title=How one of the most obese countries on earth took on the soda giants|publisher=The Guardian|date=3 November 2015|url=https://www.theguardian.com/news/2015/nov/03/obese-soda-sugar-tax-mexico|access-date=25 July 2016}}</ref>'''
Which is Fox continually referred to, his government that is, as a "regime"? THat word carries a negative connotation, makes it sound like a dictatorship. That should be edited out.


The reason given for deleting the content was that it violates ]. However, the article cited (Nash, 2007) explicitly states the following (quote) ''During the presidency of Vicente Fox, who had served as the chief executive officer of Mexico's Coca-Cola Company prior to his taking office, the federal water agency gave permission to the company to tap deep groundwater resources. The water is not metered, and the municipality does not receive reimbursement. The drive to privatize rights to exploit groundwater and make it available to foreign private companies surged during Vicente Fox's presidential term. As former president of Mexico's Coca-Cola Company, Fox was instrumental in assessing the wealth of subsoil waters and asserting the need of foreign capital with the perforation technology to dig deep wells. It was no surprise when he introduced the new Law of National Waters in 2004 that authorizes the privatization of the entire hydraulic infrastructure of federal property-dams, canals, and irrigation ditches and prioritizes the rights of extraction of water by corporations. During his presidency the Fox administration has granted rights to exploit more groundwater in a country than ever before. The country now faces water shortages owing principally to the use of subterranean water, by large-scale agribusiness. The reform in the law at the federal level has enabled the Coca-Cola company to exploit deep wells in San Cristobal de Las Casas. Although the municipality of San Cristobal does not receive any rent or payments for the rights of exploitation of the wells, Coca-Cola Company is now selling not only their signature soft drink but also 400 product lines that now include bottled water for this increasingly scarce resource. The corporation's new distribution center in San Cristobal consolidates its market gains in consumption of Coca-Cola in indigenous territory while taking advantage of low prices for clear water in territory that was known for abundant water supplies. The market has expanded with the demands of a growing tourist industry and also of low income ladinos and Indians who have no access to groundwater. Consumption of bottled water in Mexico has doubled from 1999 to 2004 as a result of increasingly contaminated waters '' (endquote).
==Height==
Somewhere it should be added that he is known for being a tall president. I have heard that he is either 6'4" or 6'5". I would have added the information myself but wasn't sure where it belongs. --] 17:00, 1 September 2005 (UTC)


I welcome your feedback on where to include this information within Misplaced Pages, if not directly in the article for Vicente Fox himself. Thank you for your time and consideration.
==TV spots==
Before and after his 5th Government Inform in September 1st, 2005, there have been numerous TV and radio spots with President Fox promoting himself as the "most democratic president in Mexico´s history" and the one that has had "most demands". These commercials have caused also controversy because of the exagerations and "marketing campaign style"
<P>If you really look at the context behind it all, you would see he is right.-- Foxista.
==NPOV==
Although Fox does not have the best track record, this article seems anti-Fox, and someone should correct this.
:I corrected some of the wording. Some of the "negative" aspectes are not necessarily POV, but public or expert opinion. If any of these are challenged, sources may be provided, or at least a note explaining it is an opinion. Could someone else check on this? --] 19:00, 10 November 2005 (UTC)


respectfully,
It is unbelievable that this article doesn't deal with al the issues that have made the Fox administration one of the most chaotics in the history of Mexico. It is completely biased--] 08:47, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
] (]) 18:57, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
:There is no issue with including a summary of the above information in the article, as it's properly sourced. The issue is with combining the two sources to allege that Fox was personally responsible for a major increase of diabetes in Mexico. That's where the ] part comes in. ] (]) 02:14, 27 July 2017 (UTC)


{{reflist-talk}}
==NPOV 2: The Sequel==
This article cannot be biased for being too "negative" or not enough "negative" at the same time. Please discuss specific issues first. --] 17:54, 15 November 2005 (UTC)


== External links modified ==
==Pronouncing Fox's name==
As Fox has an Anglo surname, I wonder how it is pronounced: as "Fox" is in English, or differently? I was hoping wikipedia could tell me this. -- ], 14 November 2005
:As the article explains, he is of Irish-American ancestry. "Fox" is an English word. So it should be pronounced as it is in English. In the Spanish-speaking word it is pronounced as it reads in Spanish F + oh + X. --] 17:56, 15 November 2005 (UTC)


Hello fellow Wikipedians,
How is that different from the English? where we also pronounce it F + oh + X. I would say it is pronounced exactly the same, and by all means put this in the article Kalimac, ] 18:16, 15 November 2005 (UTC)


I have just modified 2 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
:Well, in English it is pronounced Focks, in spanigh "o" as in "ohhhh". So, different. --] 18:24, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150929153557/https://www.donaldjtrump.com/positions/immigration-reform to https://www.donaldjtrump.com/positions/immigration-reform
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060412210244/http://www.vicentefox.org.mx/ to http://www.vicentefox.org.mx/


When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
It may well be different in the States, especially in somewhere like Alabama, than how it is in the south of England, where we definitely do not dipthong the o in fox, as it would sound like folks. Dipthonging words in a different way is a fundamental difference between American and British English. On the other hand I believe you give any pronounciation instructions to a Spanish speaker who doesn't speak English and vice-versa and they will come up with very different sounds, which is why it is so difficult for even fluent adult speakers to rid themselves of their foreign accent, ] 18:42, 15 November 2005 (UTC)


{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
:I don't understand the dipthong thing, but it sounds weird to me. The "h" has no sound by itself; writing "ohhhh" with lots of "h" simply means to pronounce a single o for a long time, without interruptions. Saying Fox with a long, single "o" is really weird; saying Fox with two o's, in two syllables, is wrong in Mexico and probably also in the US. Writing "oh" with a single "h" doesn't really change the sound but the tone, it's just a writing device to differentiate between "?Oh, estas ocupado?" (Oh, are you busy?) and "?O estas ocupado?" (Or are you busy?). From the Mexican point of view, U.S. people pronounce the o using two vowels: they read "o", the say "ou". So, a Mexican "o" is just the first half of a U.S. "o". BTW, I'm Mexican. ] 06:41, 2 December 2005 (UTC)


Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 16:39, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
::"Oh" instead of "o" is used to differentiate betwen the o in "auto" and the o in "home". --] 22:52, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
==Trump==
A huge portion of this article is devoted to Fox's statements regarding Donald Trump. That section is almost as large as the section regarding Fox's presidency. I would suggest that we cut the Trump section down by at least half. Thoughts? -- MagicatthemovieS


== Why nothing on the wild government spending of Vicente Fox? ==
Not sure about that example as the final o is subtly dipthonged, we English speakers do that automatically and find the undipthonged o at the end of a word difficult and something we need to learn if we learn Spanish. But the o in question is within a word. The different sounds are more like the difference between home and hospital, with Fox being very much like hospital, ] 23:51, 2 December 2005 (UTC)


President Vicente Fox vastly increased the pay of police officers, promised free health care for everyone, and set up a massive government backed housing campaign - which has collapsed into massive waste and corruption.
I think you are trying to describe dipthonging which is the difference between an English no which is pronounced as if it ends in a w (rhymes with snow) and a Spanish o which even if extended just makes the simple o sound. I am a bit lost by ou. By writing oh I certainly did not mean an extended ooooo as in a long Spanish no sound but an o ending in a subtle dipthonged h as found in English words like folk, bloke, etc, and for which there is no equivalent in Spanish, as indeed there is no equivalent to the o sound ending in what sounds like a w, as in blow, which rhymes with no in English. We should get an audio pronounciation (by a Mexican) of his name, this discussion certainly justifies it and I believe it is technically easy to do, ] 13:56, 2 December 2005 (UTC)


There is nothing on any of this in the article - people could read the article and not know (because it does not inform them) that the main feature of the President Fox's Presidency was wild government spending - government spending commitments (on such thing as housing and health care) that are now unsustainable for Mexico.] (]) 13:21, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

/////
In Mexico, and in all the spanish speaking countries, we pronounce the "o" in Fox the same as the "o" in "No" or the sound as in Door, or the "o" in "Short".

Some of you can say we pronounce it wrong, but every body pronounces foreing words with the rules of their own language. For example, eventhough the name of the city "Los Angeles" is Spanish, it is pronounced with the english rule. Or my name, for that matter, is an spanish name and no american can pronounce it right "Mauricio".
//////

In central mexican spanish it would be /foks/ using the IPA alphabet. However, since everyone will pronounce it the way they can, according to their mother tongues and accents, I believe it not to be really important.

Actually it's not an Anglo surname, rather it's an Irish surname, but please continue...

== Employment policy ==

Fox employment and jobs policy strongly relies on workers migration quotas to the US. Now that the US plans to build a wall along the border this policy looks doomed. This issue needs to be addressed in this article.--] 00:46, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

:Tequendamia: how about addressing it while providing the tons of evidence and verifable non-pov sources you surely have? (] 18:07, 7 May 2006 (UTC))

==I heard he was born in 1952==
The article does not talk about his early life.

== Castro and Chavez ==

I think the reference to the controversy with Fidel Castro should be under "foreign policy", and be more widely commented, since it was quite important. Also, there is no reference to the more recent one with Hugo Chávez. Both lead to the withdrawal of mexican embassadors, in Cuba for a couple of months (being then changed) and in Venezuela to this day.

==Height?==

How tall is Sr Fox? In the the photo he appears to be quite tall. (Photo appears on page ]) -- ] 17:49, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

==Offensive rant==
No need to put your offensive rant here. Your comments could be construed as vandalism and wont gain yiou the support of admins. Desist, ] 14:15, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

== his surname ==

why does he go by vicente fox if his surname is quesada? {{unsigned|Doriandixon}}
:See ]. --] (]) 06:46, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
:You ask the same about ] Helu. It's just the way Spanish people take last names. ] 19:06, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thats not true about the spanish surnames. i went to school in a predominantly mexican school and most people went by their fathers surname.
:In Spanish, or at least in Mexico, people have two surnames, the one of its father and the one of its mother. For more doubts please write your message ]. Perdonen mi pésimo inglés. Saludos. ]

== my edit is not vandalism ==

nor will it ever be vandalism.
further moreif you block me I will be unable to post any more messages till the block is lifted.

] 02:23, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

:We would not want to miss your messages. Speaking of which, why not get a username, so "you" can have a specific identity. Sometimes we may have to block a user who isn't you, but who appears to be you because of the IP. Regarding vandalism, use the edit summary to properly explain why your edit isn't vandalism. As for this article, you (or this IP) seems to be adding material that is not so much biographical as attacking. Is this bill, which he has not even signed yet, truly an important biographical detail? Maybe, but as an encyclopedia we should not be in a hurry to decide. -] 08:03, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

== First lady ==

"even the title "First Lady" does not officially exist"

Nor does it in the US, and quite possibly it doesn't exist anywhere. So is there an unofficial title like in the US or not?

== NPOV ==

The article glorifies unnecessarily Vicente Fox's administration. Statements such as the following seem to disregard his use of the state's machine to attempt keeping ] from appearing in the 2006 ballots:

"As President, Fox began to show his democratic spirit by fighting the long standing corruption within the federal government, by limiting his power to the Constitutional limits and granting more power to the state and municipal governments. In the international framework, he began to position Mexico as a leading democratic country in the hemisphere and gave priority to subjects such as international commerce, economic integration, migratory policies, defense of democracy and human rights, as well as fight against drug trafficking. On September, 2001, the National Endowment for Democracy granted him the Democracy Award 2001 and pointed him as a “hero of democracy”."

Not to mention the overall loss of jobs in the country, as well as a number of International scandals, such as the one with Cuba.

In my opinion, this article should not glorify this administration (or demean it), but if statements saying Fox has a democratic spirit and has managed to combar poverty keep appearing, there should be a "controversy" section attached as well.

:RE: Please sign your comments. Apart from the "democratic spirit" phrase, what else do you see POV? The overall loss of jobs in the country, and the international scandals are menctioned in their respective sections. The truth is that Fox is a President that has shown a democratic spirit and has made a lot of mistakes as well. He has allowed protests and the organization of local governments to an extent never seen before. I don't think the paragrah 'glorifies' Fox, because such things are exactly what happened, even thouth the Cuba scandal and the overal loss of jobs also happened... ] 21:24, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

:The article does not "glorify" President Vicente Fox "unnecessarily". On the contrary, I believe it gives a right measure of his administration. He did some good things, and he screwed up a lot as well...
:There are no evidence about his supposed "use of state machine to attempt keeping AMLO from appearing in ballots". He pardoned the guy after a near unanimous congress had convicted him!
:The problems I see with the article as it stands now is only the absence of the Cuban situation, which I will add right now, and then I'll eliminate the NPOV tag.
:Read the "economy" section and you'll see it CLEARLY states that he delivered mixed results. According to statistics from international and recognized organizations, President Fox's administration reduced poverty and lost 180,000 jobs. Both facts are stated. Where is the POV issue?
:] 03:40, 30 May 2006 (UTC)


It does glorify him, very much so. What is "Democratic spirit"? Its just an empty positive emotive word to make fox look better. What are "good things" and what are "mistakes" are not for us to judge, and niether is it for us to judge the"mesure" of his administration. Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia not a newspaper and it would be best for us to simply report the facts (and the controversy over those facts) without attaching useless emotive baggage to people. This artical also refers to the EZLN as a "problem" from this perspective it portrays the EZLN as bad and Fox is good. We should emphazize the conflict between the two without judging either as "good" or evil. It may also help to have a few words describing what the EZLN is (simply calling them "guerrilas" doesn't exactly help the average wiki reader) and the reasons for the conflict between them. Also "its and granting more power to the state and municipal governments. In the international framework, he began to position Mexico as a leading democratic country in the hemisphere and gave priority to subjects such as international commerce, economic integration, migratory policies, defense of democracy and human rights, as well as fight against drug trafficking." is very POV. Firstly it says that mexico is "a leading democratic country in the hemisphere". So now we make a random judgement call mesuring Mexicos democracy. What exactly IS democracy and how does one go a bbout mesuring it? Anyone got a democracy ruler? And then it goes on to connect "democracy" which we still can t define to "international commerce, economic integration, migratory policies, defense of democracy and human rights, as well as fight against drug trafficking." Whose to say that drug trafficing is or is not democratic? Whose to say that international commerce is Democratic? Many despotic rejimes have fought drug trafficing and also participated in international trade. Economic integration, migratoy policies and defense of Democracy (whatever that is) it goes on and on with one BS assumtion after another. The problem with this artical in terms of POV is not in its treatment of the man himself but that the whole artical is slanted towards the right.

--] 02:18, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

:"Democratic spirit" means "respect for the ideals of democracy". Those ideals are free elections, freedom of the press, and freedom of association. Fox has allowed free elections, in the federal and local arenas, and has respected the outcome of all of them, eventhough throughout his adminsitration, he lost most of them. Measuring free speech is difficult, but arguably, Fox's administration is the one that carried the most criticism against the Presidential institution than all previous administration's combined. Freedom of association can be seen by walking Paseo de la Reforma in DF. Nobody is arresting the PRD-led protests, because it is their right to associate.
:I agree the EZLN can have a better description, but lets keep it short. This article is about Vicente Fox, not about the EZLN.
:I don't think that the phrase you cite is POV. It is a summary of what Fox attempted to do. The article also cites criticsm in every subject he prioritized (such as, in the "democratic country in the hemisphere", there is criticism to how he conducted the OAS election candidacy, and in the "fight against drug trafficking" there is criticsm on how the cartels are fighting back).
:International Commerce is not necessarily democratic, I agree. But that is why they are treated as different areas of work during Fox's administration. He favored democracy AND commerce, as two separate activities.
:I don't believe that the article is "slanted towards the right". There is ample evidence to suggest that Vicente Fox did as described in the article: it contains its actions, its accomplishments, and its failures, all neatly organized. Fox is not a tyrant, he got to power through elections, and he respected ALL electoral processes and allowed them to be conducted in a fair way (at least, most analysts agree on this. Only pro-PRD press claims that the 2006 Federal Election -and only the presidential ballots, but not the legislative ballots- where tainted)...
:If you want the article to be less POV, it would be best to FIRST dispose of your own POV...


If I have made a POV contribution to wikipedia then I would appreciate it if you would show it to me. I have my own personal POV as does everyone but wikipedia is not the place for that and if I have made POV contributions then I sincerely apologize for that

That said I still think that the artical is slanted at parts not so much in facts but in tone. For example (I have changed this) it talks about cuba and venezuala as "extreme" left governments. These governments are certianly left but they are no more "extreme" left than Mexico's policies are "extreme" right. Also the artical talks about "Castro's Cuba" and "Chavez's Venezuala" as though these are not the rightfull rulers of cuba and Venezuala. We don't talk about "bush's America" so why the double standard now?

As for "spirit of democracy" i've never heard of anything specific like that and cannot get a definative answer from google so I have to assume that you just made this up, it would be better to ditch it because:

1)It is positive and emotive
2)We don't know what it means or where it came from
3)It adds absolutely nothing to the artical


I like how the part on the EZLN is though, good job whoever did that.

--] 17:39, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Just as an example, would someone please explain how:

"The incident generated criticism for President Fox and Castro for their lack of ethics in International Relations."

Is POV because it was reverted once now. The incedint certainly generated critisism for both rulers and I think that saying "you eat and you leave" is a pretty unethical thing to say (not saying that what castro did was nessasarily any better but this is why they should both be included in this sentance.)

--] 17:52, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

:Let's discuss before editing. I've reverted your edits not because I want to block them, but because I think we should discuss them before.

:First, let me apologize, I wasn't implying you made a POV contribution. I just thought that saying that the WHOLE article was "slanted towards the right" seemed very POVed, when the article contains a lot of criticism against Fox. I agree that some parts of the article are slanted towards the right, but not the WHOLE article...

:I see your point on the "Relations with Latin American countries" section. Let me explain the reasons for the original wording:

:1) Fox does not pick a fight with ALL Left governments. For example, Lula's government in Brazil is left, and Fox has not picked a fight with him, nor with Rodriguez Zapatero's government in Spain. The "extreme" was added to indicate that Fox had verbal fights with leaders of overtly communists countries, in this case Cuba and Venezuela.

:2) "Castro's Cuba" and "Chavez's Venezuela" where added to indicate that the discrepancies where specifically with the government's leader, and not with the country in general. It would be more accurate to simply leave "Castro and Chavez" instead of "Cuba and Venezuela"...

:I didn't add the "spirit of democracy", and I agree to remove the phrase. I can't seem to find the phrase anywhere on the text, so I can't remove it myself.

:I did the EZLN part. I am glad you liked it.

:About "the incident" you quote, it is simple:

:The left critizied Fox for his lack of experience in dealing with foreign countries and for insulting Cuba, and newspapers around the world criticized Castro for taping foreign Presidents and blackmailing them (well, the blackmail part was said by the right, but it is still a criticism). For me, it is obvious that Casto was criticized for his lack of ethics and Fox for his lack of experience. The sentence should be split, though I agree that a rewording is required, but a more precise one.

:I appreciate you working on this article. However, I think that discussion is important, and I would suggest you made a list of phrases you think are POV, and propose changes here. We can then discuss them and, when a consensus is reached, we can make the edit. What do you think? ] 22:29, 1 August 2006 (UTC)


I disliked the usage of the word "extreme" because

1) Extreme carries a negative emotive connotation (ie extremist) and thus is not as NPOV as I would like it,

and on an entierely different tangent

2)I thought that "extreme left" sounded like a synonome (pardon the spelling) for "Ultra left" a description that I dont think fits Cuba or Venezuala.

I have since found that "extreme left" directs to "far-left" which is both more nuetral and is more widely known then "extreme left" I think that we should change extreme to far; do you disagree?



--] 03:12, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

:I don't disagree at all. I've done the change. ] 18:54, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

==Fox Candidates issues==

As I expected long ago, the 2006 Presidential campaign is hitting this article. Some vandal is claiming that Felipe Calderón qualifies as a "Fox Candidate" (see section), and is also claiming that he is failing. I would ask that vandal to take into the account the following:

*Fox obstructed Calderon's candidacty, and Calderón was participant in making Fox REAL candidate, Santiago Creel, to fail in his Presidential ambitions. Fox can't have it both ways, either he failed with Creel, or he won with Calderon (won in the PAN primaries)...
*Calderón is not failing. Calderón is currently technically tied, with polls giving insignificant leads to himself, or his main opponent. Please see polls.

Because of the above, Calderón cannot be considered a "Fox Candidate", and has no place in the article, except to explain how he made Creel lose.

] 05:53, 22 June 2006 (UTC)


== Successor ==
I've seen vandalism all over the internet now, including Misplaced Pages. Yesterday (Thursday June 29), the wikipedia sites of Felipe Calderon, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, and Vicente Fox where vandalized proclaiming AMLO the winner of the election to take place on Sunday July 2.

Since the election is clear to be very close, I suggest that we as wikipedians try to prevent declaring a winner before the IFE does so. The official winner will be announced on Wednesday, so I think that the following conditions of valid editing to proclaim the winner should be met before declaring a winner in wikipedia:

1) If all seeminly losing candidates accept their defeat, then we can proclaim a winner.
2) If the IFE declares a winner on July 2 at night with more than 2% of difference and more than 90% of the ballots counted, then we can proclaim a winner.
3) If none of the above is met, then we should wait until Wednesday until the IFE proclaims an official winner.

What do you think?

] 15:53, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

I still see that somebody has taken the roll as the Electoral Tribunal in Mexico, and ended Vicente Fox Term before the proper date. Felipe Calderon, to the date, has not been recognized as Elected President, and Most of all, Vicente Fox Still is President of Mexico. That Means he remains incumbet as President of MExico. Please. Do not go forward before time. As We respect U.S. Election in 2000.I see also that if moderatos would be doing their jobs in here, I wouldn¿t be changing anyhting.

] 20:10, September 1st. 2006 (CST)

: Felipe Calderon Hinojosa is not yet been appointed by the Electoral College Court as the next president of Mexico. Furthermore, Vicente Fox has not yet finished its term as president of mexico. (unsigned)

:: The proper name of the court is "Electoral Tribunal of the Judicial Power of the Federation", not "Electoral College Court". The reason why this precision is important is so that readers are not confused with the Electoral College system of the United States. In Mexico, the popular vote is the only vote that counts, and the work of the Tribunal is only to qualify weather the election was trustworty or not. If it was trustworthy, then the results that the IFE has given will be validated. If the election was not trustworthy, the court can ask for a re-count in specific voting stations, or a global recount in extreme cases, or a complete annulation of the election and order the election to be re-done. This last extreme case is seen as unlikely. Basically, considering the evidence that has been put forward (including the qualification of International observers from the UN, EU, and USA), it seems that the court will validate the election. However, I agree that anything may still happen, and that it is too early to declare Felipe Calderón a winner in the Misplaced Pages, even though he virtually is.

::: I agree. For this reason, I am taking the successor box out that shows Calderon as the successor of Fox. Misplaced Pages should remain impartial and not give the impression that it is legitimazing preemptively the victory of Calderon. Even though I agree that the chances of Felipe Calderon being declared the winner are very high, we can wait until it is official.

:::I believe that wiki can be impartial on this issue until the Tribunal declares an official winner.
--] 18:03, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

:::: I don't disagree with you. However, vandalism is hard to fight

::::: Today, the court has ruled that Felipe Calderón is the President Elect of Mexico . I think that now that the ruling has been issued, this page can show Mr. Calderón as Fox's succesor.

== Main portrait ==

] isn't a good picture - it's hard to tell who is who, and it shows the pyramid better then the subjects. Didn't we have a clear portrait before, with just Fox? That'd be preferable. The pyramid picture certainly deserves a place in the article, but not as the introductory image. -] 03:25, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
**I agree. I thought the picture of Fox in front of the Mexican flag was very good. ] 23:48, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
***Ive just added a better image off the wikimedia commons but the original image would be better, why was it deleted?--] 16:11, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

== Recent Changes ==
Today, a user called "Ya ya ya ya ya ya" deleted all major parts of the article that were unsourced. I did my best to salvage the article, as "Ya ya ya ya ya ya" refused to let me restore it to its original quality.

Right now, some pieces of the article make no sense at all, as some paragraphs have been logically cut. However, I've done my best to get as many sources as possible to restore the most important information the article possessed. Since I've followed Fox closely, I know that EVERYTHING that the previous version of the article contained was true and accurate, however, finding the sources is nearly impossible. Please help wikipedia gathering more sources. "Ya ya ya ya ya ya" has threatened to erase any addition to the article that is unsourced.

Presently, the article is a logical and informational disgrace: it contains very few useful information, and it is poorly organized. Your help is needed. We've worked so hard to keep this article current, up to date, and accurate. It is fair to also make it wikipedia-complaint by adding sources. Please help.
] 05:51, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

:If you re-add unsourced criticism to this page again your edit will be regarded and treated as vandalism. You have been warned and directed to ]. Do not try my patience or you will be reported to ]. ] 21:49, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

::Hey, the version you recently erased was not my latest version! Joseph Solis decided to bring back the older version. Please consider my version with sources.

::I agree about the importance of sourcing, but the previous version was created after months work and the participation of many editors. We have agreed in consensus and to the best of our knowledge that such version represented the most accurate description of the President of Mexico. Perhaps you could be a little bit more understanding and allow us to look for sources for that material... ] 21:56, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
:::No, I can't. ] is quite clear. Unsourced criticism is removed. Discussion on this point is not necessary. I suggest you read the policy. ] 21:59, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

==Here is a source about Vicente Fox racist comment==

'''Reported by CNN'''

http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/05/14/fox.jackson/

'''Mexican leader criticized for comment on blacks'''

CNN) -- The Rev. Jesse Jackson on Saturday criticized Mexican President Vicente Fox's comment that Mexican immigrants to the United States take jobs "that not even blacks want to do."

Jackson called the remark "a spurious comparison" with "ominous racial overtones."

The Mexican president's office issued a statement late Saturday disputing the negative interpretation of his comments, saying Fox has "enormous respect to minorities whatever their racial, ethnic, or religious origin may be."

A Mexican official defended Fox later in the day, saying his description was not meant as an insult.

"The president didn't make a declaration in the racist sense; of course there are those who interpret it in that way," Foreign Relations Secretary Luis Derbez told a reporter in the Mexican state of Jalisco.

According to Derbez, Fox was making the point that "Mexican migrants are making great contributions in the United States and that their role is a positive role."

"They've been able to improve the conditions of life not just for themselves but also for the communities in which they settle and, by the same token, the president made the comment in this context to say that a large quantity of the jobs taken by Mexicans are jobs that in the U.S. society aren't being filled."

"I think that what we have to be very clear about is that the statement made by the president was in no way motivated by racism."

'Most poor Americans are ... white'
But Jackson told CNN in a telephone interview that Fox "should not confuse the need for sound legal immigration policy between the two countries, which is important, and the border disputes between the two countries, with a spurious comparison."

"The comparison is diversionary from the issue of a workable immigration policy between the U.S. and Mexico."

Jackson, who said he has never met Fox, planned to call the Mexican president.

Fox made the controversial comment Friday to a group of Texas businessmen meeting in Mexico. He criticized recent steps the United States has taken that the Bush administration said were aimed at curbing illegal immigration.

Fox discussed the role that many Mexican immigrants occupy in the U.S. economy.

Speaking in Spanish, he said, "There is no doubt that Mexicans, filled with dignity, willingness and ability to work, are doing jobs that not even blacks want to do there in the United States."

A State Department spokesman who asked not to be named, read CNN a statement saying, "That level of dialogue doesn't merit comment."

The spokesman also said, "President Bush's commitment to immigration reform that is rational, legal, common sense, decent and compassionate is well-documented."

Jackson said he has worked "for the citizenship rights of immigrants and Mexican Americans" and wants steps taken to avoid making the United States "hostile toward immigration policy."

He said Fox's comment about "blacks" seemed to be about a stereotype. "Most poor Americans are not black, they're white," he added.

But Jackson stopped short of saying Fox should apologize.

"I don't know about that," he said, adding that the comment was "unwitting, unnecessary, and inappropriate."

] 08:51, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

==Vicente Fox Angers Black Americans With Racist==
Vicente Fox Angers Black Americans With Racist

It's been two days since Mexico's President Vicente Fox made the infamous remark about how Mexican (nationals) men and women are doing the work in the United States that "not even blacks want to do…"

From this side of the Rio Grande, the remark is insensitive, not to mention politically incorrect.

Yet, when Fox and his Administration played dumb about the impact of the comment - I have to believe them. I've seen firsthand how blacks are pretty much an invisible segment of their society, even in this 21st Century.

The history of Afro-Mexicans is largely forgotten or relegated to that time in history that many Mexicans still resent when Spaniards came and ravaged their homeland. To help them with their many needs, the Spaniards brought African slaves with them. Thus is the origin of blacks in Mexico.

It's not unusual for Mexican comics to dress in blackface and elicit howls of laughter from audiences.

When our embassy in Mexico City first protested Fox's remarks, el presidente's damage control staff went into high gear "re-explaining" what Fox meant.

Sound familiar?

Anyway, Fox's office now realizes that if they want sympathy from the politicians that can help them the most for their cause on this side of the border, they're going to not only have to watch what they say but stop defending remarks that should be just as offensive to Mexican blacks as U.S. blacks.

On Sunday, Fox's office issued a statement saying that Fox "conveys his utmost respect to all minorities regardless of their racial, ethnic or religious background, and thus, regrets and expresses his disagreement with the interpretations that described (his) statements as racist."

I just hope his respect for all minorities extends throughout his own country, as well as, a gesture to mend fences/borders.

Link http://latinalista.blogspot.com/2005/05/vicente-fox-angers-black-americans.html

] 08:53, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

==NPOV==
This article does not have a neutral point of view, at least in the beginning, in which there are comments made by individual not listed, and are therefore presented as facts. ] 03:08, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
:To what comments are you referring to? Now, I find it unfair that you add an NPOV tag after you erased months of work on this article. I've been doing my best to recover some of the information that was available, both of Fox accomplisments as of the criticism against him. Why add an NPOV tag after you erased over 70% of the article? ] 03:26, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
::If you continue to add uncited, POV, OR nonsense to Misplaced Pages you will be blocked. Consider this your '''final''' warning. ] 01:54, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
:::Ever since you started editing this article, I have been contributing only sourced material. ] 01:57, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
:::"Sourced"? 90% of your links were broken. The other 10% did not support the content that you added. . ] 02:02, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

::::The links are not broken, I just tried them out 1 minute ago, they work! I challenge you. Also, the sources DO support the content I added. I read it throughly. Plus, you erased links because they where in spanish! I find this amazing considering that the politican being researched is President of a spanish-speaking country and most of the information concerning him would be in spanish! It is common to source material from different languages when english material is not available. Plus! some of the links you erased because "they are in spanish" where actually in english... Further, it is common in the ], ], ], ] (etc...) pages and I don't see you being this passionate about them as you are here! In my opinion, you are just here destroying content. This page took months to create, it took me hours to find these sources, read them, digest them, and try to write this as NPOV as possible.
::::I agree that I am not perfect and I may make mistakes, but talking about them is a better way to solve them than barging into an article you haven't been working on, destroying it, offering no advice on how to improve it, and acting as dictator of wikipedia. If you want to make this article better, I appreciate it. I also want to make this article better. But use of threates and undiscriminated destruction of content is no way of doing it. ] 02:13, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

*I have several points
#First of all most of the earlier links ''were'' broken because you sourced primarily to Reuters articles. Reuters is a news aggregate and is never accepted as a long-term source because all Reuters links are temporary.
#The genuine sources you or other users provided only now support the content because I changed it to accurately reflect what was in those sources. There were numerous unsourced assertions, that you added, in the previous versions, which have never been sourced, properly or improperly.
#It is acceptable to source content to foreign language sources only when English sources are not easily available. In this case, English sources are easily available. As you said, he is the President of a major nation.
#Thank you for pointing out those pages. I will be getting to all of those promptly, with the same level of passion.
#Calling me a dictator of Misplaced Pages, along with all of your other personal attacks, are violations of ]. Please read this policy thoroughly. I have not threatened you, I have told you repeatedly to properly source the content you add. If you choose not to follow Misplaced Pages policy, then you choose to face the consequences. If you think I'm being unfair or violating policy, then get ]. ] 03:52, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

:Sourcing foreign-language links are allowed. There is no hard rule saying they are disallowed if English sources are available. Please also ] and stop threatening to get others blocked. I have restored the bit about President Fox's personal life. If there are further content disputes, please get a ] or request ] or ] mediation. Cheers, &ndash; ]] 13:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
::Chacor, your attempt to misinterpret policy do not amuse me. If you can not edit responsibly, do not edit at all.

*From ], "Because this is the English Misplaced Pages, for the convenience of our readers, English-language sources should be provided whenever possible, and should always be used in preference to foreign-language sources (assuming equal quality and reliability). For example, do not use a foreign-language newspaper as a source unless there is no equivalent article in an English-language newspaper. However, foreign-language sources are acceptable in terms of verifiability, subject to the same criteria as English-language sources."

All of this content should be able to be sourced to English language sources as Fox is a major public figure. If there are not English language source equivalents to the Spanish sources, then the Spanish-language sources provided are unreliable. Your suggestion to assume good faith is amusing. I cited Misplaced Pages policy and treated this as a content dispute, even though it is not. Hseldon10 responded by calling me a "dictator of Misplaced Pages." You suggested, labeling this a "content dispute," that I seek a third opinion. If you had actually read my statement directly above yours, you would have seen I suggested Hseldon try this. He has thus far decided against it... I wonder why? Spamming my talkpage is annoying, but ineffective. Desist. ] 18:46, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

: That's a nonsense interpretation, it says no such thing as if its a major public figure only english sources are considered reliable. --] 18:48, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

:The content you're repeatedly removing does not show a living person in a negative light, which the the relevant portion of ]. In addition, your assertion that a lack of English-language sources about a Mexican leader means that the Spanish-language sources are unreliable is hard to support. I'd expect that Spanish language sources about the leader of a Spanish-speaking country would tend to be more reliable than English-langauge ones. Certainly, if sources in English can be found they should be cited instead of the Spanish citations, but that's not a justifcation for removing content against consensus. ] 18:59, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

::I haven't decided against seeking a third party, yet... However, I am trying to find sources to add more content and pass them through you first. For me, consensus is more important than winning... Finally, I find it interesting that I am not alone in criticising your destruction of this article. As I said, this was the work of a lot of editors who had reached consensus on this content. I believe that if our concern is the quality of the article, contributing to discussion and consensus is more important than destruction of content without talking first. ] 19:20, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:01, 20 October 2024

Former good article nomineeVicente Fox was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 9, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 2, 2011, and July 2, 2014.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBiography: Politics and Government
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconConservatism Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMexico High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPolitics High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list for Vicente Fox: edit·history·watch·refresh· Updated 2007-05-31


Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
  • Article requests :
    Fox influence in the election, court ruling, public perception, contrast with local governments, Fox's statement on desquite against AMLO and discussion on it
    Mexico's shift in foreign policy during Fox, distancing from Latin America and working towards the goals set by Washington, Mexico's position in the Security Council, and vote with regards to the War in Iraq, shift in attitude from FDI investors, signature of the Free Trade Agreement with Japan, new relations with the EU, Fox kissing the Pope's ring (and public reaction), Mexico's new role in the International Arena, counterbalanced with critics calling Mexico submissive to the US
    Immigration to the US, Fox's push for immigration reform in the US, Fox's influence on both Republicans and Democrats reaching an agreement
    Mexico-US relations, praise received from US Congress, and officials, Fox asking the resignation of Adolfo Aguilar Zinser to the UN after calling Mexico the backyard of the US, official reason and alleged pressure from Colin Powell to Fox on the subject
    Monterrey Summit on Financing for Development (UN anti-poverty conference, Special Summit of the Americas), landmark of the Monterrey Consensus, role of Fox on the consensus
    Castro complaints of US influence, Bush denial, Fox denial (and through Castañeda), Fox "comes y te vas" phone call to Castro, reactions in Mexico, reactions in Cuba, relations strained, Congress response, International response, popular culture
    Derbez for president of the OAS, Fox's campaign, voting deadlock, Derbez conceding, Mercosur meeting
    Fox at the Americas Summit in Mar del Plata, Fox's push for the FTAA, those calling Fox Washington's pawn. Reaction of the attendees (Chile, Argentina, Brazil, Venezuela, Bolivia, Uruguay and Paraguay) and other countries (Canada and Cuba)
    Accusations of traffic of influences during Fox, the Henkel family, The Bribiescas (Congressional investigation #1, Congressional investigation #2, Congressional investigation #3), Olga Wornat's book and lawsuit, court ruling
    Crime in Mexico, drug trafficking, accusations of criminal complicity with local officials in Baja California, Sinaloa, Nuevo León, Tamaulipas, and Guerrero. Murders, death of Ramón Martín Huerta, rumors of drug involvement and official denial. Murders of journalists, Mexico is second to Iraq in number of journalists assassinated per year, according to CEPET hemisphere. Creation of the Prosecutor of Crimes Against Journalists, amid pressure from international watchdogs Daniel Vega Vera (journalists leery on seeing results, failure to produce results (lack of jurisdiction at the federal level, of 109 denounces no accusations were produced). Performance of the Prosecutor, performance of the judges, proper documentation of accusations. Drug-related murders. Female homicides in Ciudad Juárez
    Local social conflicts. San Salvador Atenco, Texcoco airport plan, Community Front in Defense of Land, no change in plan,will be solved, cancellation. 2006 civil unrest in San Salvador Atenco. Chiapas , 15 minutes, steps to correct issue, the EZLN "resolution", the radicalization of Marcos, and the latter's "insults" against Lopez Obrador. 2006 Oaxaca protests, responsibility of the Federal Government. Pasta de Conchos mine disaster, accusations of fraud against the Miner Union
    Economy: Competitiveness, HDI improvemen from 2000 to 2003 and to 2006, and historical, comparison with HDI of other countries in the region Comparison with previous administrations, Lopez Portillo's, Salinas administration, Zedillo administration. Poverty reduction, Increase in unemployment
    drop in international Transparency,
    drop in GDP rankings
  • Expand : primaries, internal opposition to his candidacy within the ranks of the PAN.
    Relations with congress
    Puebla Panama Plan
    Education
    Changes to his cabinet
    His performance as the Governor of Guanajuato
  • NPOV : Presidential legacy. Find the generalized view, and objective information, on his term in the following subjects: freedom of press, civil rights. Note that on freedom of press, there is already an outline presented and under discussion.

Archives

20th Century Fox

Is his family behind the movie studios? The McChicken costs $1 (talk) 23:36, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Very unlikely. --Diego Grez (talk) 02:47, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Fox in nature.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Fox in nature.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Misplaced Pages, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 06:46, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Presidency

This section talks about his public persona, and then quotes one historian that only condemns his presidency. I don't know a lot about Mexican politics, but my Mexican friends seem to love Fox, so he must have done something good (housing?). This section says nothing of his specific policies - it just says he was inept - it seems biased and not very detailed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jyonsin (talkcontribs) 18:14, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Post-Presidential Discussion of the War on Drugs

I suggest the addition of the following text.

Former Mexican President Vicente Fox said that "making drug consumption legal in the United States would lessen its use and take the illegal stream of money away from the criminal cartels." He used Holland and Portugal as two examples for the successful implementation of this policy.

  1. EPATKO, LARISA (2012). "Mexico's Former President Vicente Fox Joins Calls to Legalize Drugs". Public Broadcasting Service. Retrieved 7/18/2012. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help); More than one of |author= and |last= specified (help)
  2. EPATKO, LARISA (2012). "Mexico's Former President Vicente Fox Joins Calls to Legalize Drugs". Public Broadcasting Service. Retrieved 7/18/2012. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help); More than one of |author= and |last= specified (help)

Let us disscuss. My best regards, Geraldshields11 (talk) 18:39, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 12 external links on Vicente Fox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —Talk to my owner:Online 22:15, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 6 external links on Vicente Fox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—Talk to my owner:Online 16:04, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Criticism of Donald Trump

I want to expand the section about Fox's criticism of Donald Trump in the "post-presidency" section, but apparently my edits are rigorously shitty and not good enough for Misplaced Pages, and keep getting reverted. This is the information I want to add to the section:
1. Fox has emerged as a staunch and vocal critic of Donald Trump because of Trump's comments about Mexico and Mexicans.
2. Fox apologized to Trump for the strong language he used when denouncing Trump's border wall proposal, while standing by his criticism of the proposal itself and calling on Trump to apologize for his comments about Mexicans being "rapists".
3. Fox has personally invited Donald Trump to visit Mexico with him.
4. Despite his apology, Fox continues to constantly criticize Trump to the international media, most notably on Twitter, where he alternates between trolling Trump and responding to his rhetoric. (Just about every tweet Fox makes is about or directed at Trump, and has earned recognition from the media multiple times).
5. Fox has personally vowed to end Trump's political career and has stated, "I intend to be Donald Trump's shadow until he leaves politics."

Can you all help me add this information to the article in a way so it won't get reverted within five seconds of me adding it? Reattacollector (talk) 01:32, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Expropriation of local groundwater in Chiapas Mexico

The following content has been removed twice when I tried to add it to this article under Early Years > Business Career. I want to continue the discussion of this content, because it is important content and should be included somewhere, though perhaps in a different location or article? Here is the content I wrote that was deleted:

Fox was also largely responsible for Coca Cola's expropriation of local groundwater in Chiapas, Mexico "by allowing unlimited extraction of deep water resources" that obstructed access to local groundwater and increased consumption of soda, which contributed to Mexico's diabetes epidemic, currently the nation's leading cause of death.

The reason given for deleting the content was that it violates WP:SYNTH. However, the article cited (Nash, 2007) explicitly states the following (quote) During the presidency of Vicente Fox, who had served as the chief executive officer of Mexico's Coca-Cola Company prior to his taking office, the federal water agency gave permission to the company to tap deep groundwater resources. The water is not metered, and the municipality does not receive reimbursement. The drive to privatize rights to exploit groundwater and make it available to foreign private companies surged during Vicente Fox's presidential term. As former president of Mexico's Coca-Cola Company, Fox was instrumental in assessing the wealth of subsoil waters and asserting the need of foreign capital with the perforation technology to dig deep wells. It was no surprise when he introduced the new Law of National Waters in 2004 that authorizes the privatization of the entire hydraulic infrastructure of federal property-dams, canals, and irrigation ditches and prioritizes the rights of extraction of water by corporations. During his presidency the Fox administration has granted rights to exploit more groundwater in a country than ever before. The country now faces water shortages owing principally to the use of subterranean water, by large-scale agribusiness. The reform in the law at the federal level has enabled the Coca-Cola company to exploit deep wells in San Cristobal de Las Casas. Although the municipality of San Cristobal does not receive any rent or payments for the rights of exploitation of the wells, Coca-Cola Company is now selling not only their signature soft drink but also 400 product lines that now include bottled water for this increasingly scarce resource. The corporation's new distribution center in San Cristobal consolidates its market gains in consumption of Coca-Cola in indigenous territory while taking advantage of low prices for clear water in territory that was known for abundant water supplies. The market has expanded with the demands of a growing tourist industry and also of low income ladinos and Indians who have no access to groundwater. Consumption of bottled water in Mexico has doubled from 1999 to 2004 as a result of increasingly contaminated waters (endquote).

I welcome your feedback on where to include this information within Misplaced Pages, if not directly in the article for Vicente Fox himself. Thank you for your time and consideration.

respectfully, Matthew Musselman (talk) 18:57, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

There is no issue with including a summary of the above information in the article, as it's properly sourced. The issue is with combining the two sources to allege that Fox was personally responsible for a major increase of diabetes in Mexico. That's where the WP:SYNTH part comes in. Joefromrandb (talk) 02:14, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

References

  1. Nash, June (November 2007). "CONSUMING INTERESTS: Water, Rum, and Coca-Cola from Ritual Propitiation to Corporate Expropriation in Highland Chiapas". Cultural Anthropology. 22 (4): 621–639. doi:10.1525/can.2007.22.4.621. Retrieved 25 July 2016.
  2. Rosenberg, Tina (3 November 2015). "How one of the most obese countries on earth took on the soda giants". The Guardian. Retrieved 25 July 2016.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Vicente Fox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:39, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Trump

A huge portion of this article is devoted to Fox's statements regarding Donald Trump. That section is almost as large as the section regarding Fox's presidency. I would suggest that we cut the Trump section down by at least half. Thoughts? -- MagicatthemovieS

Why nothing on the wild government spending of Vicente Fox?

President Vicente Fox vastly increased the pay of police officers, promised free health care for everyone, and set up a massive government backed housing campaign - which has collapsed into massive waste and corruption.

There is nothing on any of this in the article - people could read the article and not know (because it does not inform them) that the main feature of the President Fox's Presidency was wild government spending - government spending commitments (on such thing as housing and health care) that are now unsustainable for Mexico.2A02:C7D:B47A:C900:351A:524E:754C:E7BA (talk) 13:21, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Categories: