Misplaced Pages

:Deny recognition: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:23, 13 September 2006 view sourceRadiant! (talk | contribs)36,918 edits The existence of the disputed tag is disputed. Thank you for your time.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:57, 12 November 2024 view source Swatjester (talk | contribs)Administrators27,351 edits Undid revision 1256988197 by BarakHussan (talk) no consensus for this. Please discuss.Tag: Undo 
(563 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Essay explaining to not provide fuel for the trolls}}
{{protected}}
{{hatnote|You may be looking for ], the dispute resolution noticeboard.}}
{{proposal|]|type=]}}
{{Redirect|WP:DENY|denying the antecedent|WP:FALLACY}}
{{Distinguish|WP:BANREVERT}}
{{pp-vandalism|small=yes}}
{{essay|WP:DENY|WP:DFTT}}
{{nutshell|Recognition is a motivation for vandalism. Trolls require food − don't feed the trolls.}}
]


True ] and ] (as distinguished from users who dabble in minor vandalism) usually suffer from chronic alienation and real or perceived powerlessness. They seek recognition and infamy by interrupting and frustrating the Misplaced Pages project and community. Such users experience exceptional attention as empowerment, reward, and encouragement. This is particularly true for those prolific vandals who have been immortalised on Misplaced Pages pages, meticulously catalogued by ] pages, targeted by dedicated templates, and thereby have become a noted part of wiki culture.{{efn|One notable example is ], where a vandal requested their own long term abuse page be created for them – that same user had previously taken screenshots of their own sockpuppets' vandalism and added them to other ] pages.}}
== Explanation ==
Motivations for vandalism (as distinguished from abuse like harassment and edit warring) range from a desire for recognition and infamy<ref>As an example of desire for recognition and infamy as a motivation for vandalism, see on ].</ref> to frustration with the project or community<ref>For more information of motivations for wiki vandalism, see the Misplaced Pages article ].</ref>. Vandalism is ''encouraged'' by offering such users exceptional notice. This is particularly true for prolific vandals, who are immortalised by Misplaced Pages pages, meticulously catalogued by category pages, dedicated specific templates, and who thereby become a notable part of wiki culture.


== Encouragement ==
This glorification of vandalism through infamy encourages ]s through ], where users imitate notorious or unique vandalism methods for amusement, to share in the infamy, or for the thrill of defying authority and/or the perception of destroying other users' work. Denying recognition and infamy removes the primary motivations for vandalism and disruption. This glorification of vandalism through infamy encourages ]s through ], where users imitate notorious or unique vandalism methods for amusement, to share in the infamy, or for the thrill of defying authority and/or interfering in other users' work. Denying recognition and infamy neutralizes common primary motivators for vandalism and disruption.

Media exposure of vandalism on Misplaced Pages seems to invite increased vandalism. When a person writes in a newspaper or says on television that it is easy to insert nonsense in Misplaced Pages, invariably a number of imitators want to see it for themselves and believe they are "hackers". Making this issue seem more important than it is reinforces this behavior (see ]).

== Continuing to deal with vandalism ==
Some material is still going to be valuable in dealing with vandalism, so this is not about pretending vandalism does not exist. Instead, information on vandalism should be critically appraised: first, whether it has genuine value; then, whether that value outweighs any detriment from the publicity of that vandal or their vandalism. Stating that a certain individual is involved in very obvious vandalism probably does not enable any better recognition or response to that vandalism—it merely adds to the legend of a specific vandal. On the other hand, documenting a new form of vandalism in a neutral manner like {{Section link|Misplaced Pages:Vandalism#Types of vandalism}} ensures a suitable awareness of that vandalism's existence.


== How to mitigate vandalism == == How to mitigate vandalism ==
If you see information pages about vandals or vandalism that you think have no practical purpose,
If you see information pages about vandals or vandalism that you think has no practical purpose, ] (if you see a whole group of similar pages, make a group nomination). Userpages for indefinitely blocked users (except sockpuppets and banned users) that have no practical purpose should be deleted after a short while<ref>IP addresses stored for registered users are only kept in the system for so long; categorising a user after this period of time serves no useful purpose.</ref>.

* If this page is pure vandalism, tag it with {{tl|Db-g3}};
* If this page is created by banned or blocked users '''after''' the ban or block, tag it with {{tl|Db-g5|''username''}};
* If this page is an obvious personal attack, remove all content and then tag it with {{tl|Db-g10}};
* Otherwise, quietly revert or blank. Reserve ] for serious matters, noting that a high-profile forum discussion of vandalism is the opposite of "deny recognition".

User pages of ] users (except ] and banned users) that have no practical purpose can be nominated for deletion as such after a short while.{{efn|IP addresses stored for registered users are only kept in the system for so long; categorising a user after this period of time serves no useful purpose.}} '''Remember that this is not a ]''', unless the page is pure vandalism, or a personal attack. In general, "socktags" on blocked sockpuppets' user pages should only be added, removed, or modified by administrators or ].

== See also ==
'''Similar pages:'''
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] on ]
* ] on ]
* ]
* ]
* ]

'''Contrasting pages:'''
* ]
* {{Section link|Misplaced Pages:Editing policy#Try to fix problems}}
* ]

== Footnotes ==
{{notelist}}

== Further reading ==
*{{cite book |last=Sutton |first=Robert |author-link=Robert I. Sutton |title=] |date=February 2007 |publisher=Business Plus |isbn=978-0-446-52656-2 }}
*{{cite web |title=How to Keep Hostile Jerks from Taking Over Your Online Community |url= http://www.informationweek.com/d/d-id/1055100 |first=Cory |last=Doctorow |authorlink=Cory Doctorow |work=] |publisher=TechWeb Business Technology Network |date=May 14, 2007 |accessdate=September 22, 2015}}


{{Misplaced Pages essays|civility}}
== Notes ==
=== References ===
<references />


]
=== See also ===
]
* ]
* ] ]
* ]
* ]

Latest revision as of 19:57, 12 November 2024

Essay explaining to not provide fuel for the trolls You may be looking for WP:DRN, the dispute resolution noticeboard. "WP:DENY" redirects here. For denying the antecedent, see WP:FALLACY. Not to be confused with WP:BANREVERT.

Essay on editing Misplaced Pages
This is an essay.
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Misplaced Pages contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Misplaced Pages's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
Shortcuts
This page in a nutshell: Recognition is a motivation for vandalism. Trolls require food − don't feed the trolls.
Never feed the trolls.

True vandals and trolls (as distinguished from users who dabble in minor vandalism) usually suffer from chronic alienation and real or perceived powerlessness. They seek recognition and infamy by interrupting and frustrating the Misplaced Pages project and community. Such users experience exceptional attention as empowerment, reward, and encouragement. This is particularly true for those prolific vandals who have been immortalised on Misplaced Pages pages, meticulously catalogued by category pages, targeted by dedicated templates, and thereby have become a noted part of wiki culture.

Encouragement

This glorification of vandalism through infamy encourages Internet memes through reinforcement, where users imitate notorious or unique vandalism methods for amusement, to share in the infamy, or for the thrill of defying authority and/or interfering in other users' work. Denying recognition and infamy neutralizes common primary motivators for vandalism and disruption.

Media exposure of vandalism on Misplaced Pages seems to invite increased vandalism. When a person writes in a newspaper or says on television that it is easy to insert nonsense in Misplaced Pages, invariably a number of imitators want to see it for themselves and believe they are "hackers". Making this issue seem more important than it is reinforces this behavior (see positive feedback).

Continuing to deal with vandalism

Some material is still going to be valuable in dealing with vandalism, so this is not about pretending vandalism does not exist. Instead, information on vandalism should be critically appraised: first, whether it has genuine value; then, whether that value outweighs any detriment from the publicity of that vandal or their vandalism. Stating that a certain individual is involved in very obvious vandalism probably does not enable any better recognition or response to that vandalism—it merely adds to the legend of a specific vandal. On the other hand, documenting a new form of vandalism in a neutral manner like Misplaced Pages:Vandalism § Types of vandalism ensures a suitable awareness of that vandalism's existence.

How to mitigate vandalism

If you see information pages about vandals or vandalism that you think have no practical purpose,

  • If this page is pure vandalism, tag it with {{Db-g3}};
  • If this page is created by banned or blocked users after the ban or block, tag it with {{Db-g5}};
  • If this page is an obvious personal attack, remove all content and then tag it with {{Db-g10}};
  • Otherwise, quietly revert or blank. Reserve listing the page as miscellany for deletion for serious matters, noting that a high-profile forum discussion of vandalism is the opposite of "deny recognition".

User pages of indefinitely blocked users (except sockpuppets and banned users) that have no practical purpose can be nominated for deletion as such after a short while. Remember that this is not a criterion for speedy deletion, unless the page is pure vandalism, or a personal attack. In general, "socktags" on blocked sockpuppets' user pages should only be added, removed, or modified by administrators or sockpuppet investigations clerks.

See also

Similar pages:

Contrasting pages:

Footnotes

  1. One notable example is here, where a vandal requested their own long term abuse page be created for them – that same user had previously taken screenshots of their own sockpuppets' vandalism and added them to other long term abuse pages.
  2. IP addresses stored for registered users are only kept in the system for so long; categorising a user after this period of time serves no useful purpose.

Further reading

Misplaced Pages essays (?)
Essays on building, editing, and deleting content
Philosophy
Article construction
Writing article content
Removing or
deleting content
Essays on civility
The basics
Philosophy
Dos
Don'ts
WikiRelations
Essays on notability
Humorous essays
About essays
About essays
Policies and guidelines
Categories: