| Revision as of 17:05, 13 September 2006 editRadiant! (talk | contribs)36,918 edits {{tl|proposed}}← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:45, 19 January 2015 edit undoOiyarbepsy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers26,310 edits ←Redirected page to User:John254 | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| {| class="infobox" width="150" | |||
| |- | |||
| !align="center"|] | |||
| ] Note: The links below are permanent links to the correct versions of the archived talk pages. Any "newer" versions of these pages may have been compromised. | |||
| ---- | |||
| |- | |||
| |align="center"|''' ''' | |||
| |} | |||
| ] | |||
| == Richardson == | |||
| Hey John254 -- thanks for quickly reverting the recent vandalism on the ] page. Much appreciated... ] 22:48, 11 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your edit to ]== | |||
| You added: ''However, some editors give a narrow construction to ], and claim that process should be adhered to unless there is a compelling justification for ]. It is said that the which began with a speedy deletion demonstrates the need to follow appropriate processes in most cases.'' | |||
| This doesn't make sense to me. Speedy deletion is performed hundreds of times every day. --] 02:15, 13 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == {{tl|proposed}} == | |||
| That was two and a half years ago. The wiki evolves, and we strongly recommend against voting on any proposal these days. ] 17:05, 13 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:45, 19 January 2015
Redirect to: