Misplaced Pages

Corvette leaf spring: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:29, 22 December 2016 editSpringee (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,455 edits →Recent patents and related research: rrv← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:59, 9 June 2024 edit undoGreenC bot (talk | contribs)Bots2,547,813 edits Move 4 urls. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:URLREQ#google.com/patents 
(69 intermediate revisions by 32 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Type of independent suspension}}
'''Corvette leaf spring''' commonly refers to a type of ] which utilizes a ] (FRP) mono-leaf spring instead of more conventional coil springs. It is named after the American sports car ]<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.de/books?id=WsjanO7xW58C&pg=PA81&lpg=PA81&dq=corvette+leaf+spring+design+history&source=bl&ots=CkRSGle9Qr&sig=BLRWxppsbVqjfRgdrRBqBmUbqns&hl=de&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjV0-3l7Z7MAhWhK5oKHcbfClU4FBDoAQgoMAI#v=onepage&q=corvette%20leaf%20spring%20design%20history&f=false |title=Corvette - The Great American Sports Car - Staff of Old Cars Weekly |page=81 |website=Books.google.de |date=1975-10-02 |accessdate=2016-11-14}}</ref> for which it was originally developed and first utilized.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.corvetteonline.com/history-2/the-top-5-technological-advancements-in-corvette-history/ |title=The Top 5 Technological Advancements In Corvette History |publisher=Corvette Online |date=2015-05-16 |accessdate=2016-11-14}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.edmunds.com/chevrolet/corvette/history |title=Chevrolet Corvette History |website=Edmunds.com |date= |accessdate=2016-11-14}}</ref><ref name=CompWorld>{{cite web|url=http://www.compositesworld.com/articles/composite-leaf-springs-saving-weight-in-production-suspension-systems |title=Composite leaf springs: Saving weight in production suspension systems |publisher=CompositesWorld |date=2014-02-03 |accessdate=2016-11-14}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.autocomposites.org/composites101/history.cfm |title=ACMA: Automotive Composites Alliance - Auto Composites 101: History of Automotive Composites |website=Autocomposites.org |date= |accessdate=2016-11-14}}</ref><ref name=CB>{{cite web|author=Chris Longhurst |url=http://www.carbibles.com/suspension_bible.html |title=The Suspension Bible |publisher=Car Bibles |date=2016-10-26 |accessdate=2016-11-14}}</ref> A notable characteristic of this suspension configuration is the mounting of the mono-leaf spring such that it can serve as both ride spring and anti-roll spring. In contrast to many applications of leaf springs in automotive suspension designs, this type does not use the spring as a locating link. While this suspension type is most notably associated with several generations of the ] the design has been used in other production ] cars as well as vehicles from ] and ]. ] and ] produced cars with a similar configuration using a multi-leaf steel spring in place of the FRP mono-leaf spring. Several manufactures and suppliers have since researched, adapted and utilized variations of this suspension design. A '''Corvette leaf spring''' is a type of ] that utilizes a ] (FRP) mono-leaf spring instead of more conventional coil springs. It is named after the ],<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WsjanO7xW58C&pg=PA81 |title=Corvette - The Great American Sports Car - Staff of Old Cars Weekly |page=81 |date=1975-10-02 |publisher=F+W Media |isbn=9781440217647 |access-date=2016-11-14 }}{{dead link|date=October 2019|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> the American sports car for which it was originally developed and first utilized.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.corvetteonline.com/history-2/the-top-5-technological-advancements-in-corvette-history/ |title=The Top 5 Technological Advancements In Corvette History |publisher=Corvette Online |date=2015-05-16 |access-date=2016-11-14}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.edmunds.com/chevrolet/corvette/history |title=Chevrolet Corvette History |website=Edmunds.com |date= |access-date=2016-11-14}}</ref><ref name=CompWorld>{{cite web|url=http://www.compositesworld.com/articles/composite-leaf-springs-saving-weight-in-production-suspension-systems |title=Composite leaf springs: Saving weight in production suspension systems |publisher=CompositesWorld |date=2014-02-03 |access-date=2016-11-14}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.autocomposites.org/composites101/history.cfm |title=ACMA: Automotive Composites Alliance - Auto Composites 101: History of Automotive Composites |website=Autocomposites.org |access-date=2016-11-14 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170117063725/http://www.autocomposites.org/composites101/history.cfm |archivedate=2017-01-17 }}</ref><ref name=CB>{{cite web |author=Chris Longhurst |url=http://www.carbibles.com/suspension_bible.html |title=The Suspension Bible |publisher=Car Bibles |date=2016-10-26 |access-date=2016-11-14 |archive-date=2007-02-06 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070206034707/http://www.carbibles.com/suspension_bible.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> A notable characteristic of this suspension configuration is the mounting of the mono-leaf spring such that it can serve as both ride spring and anti-roll spring. In contrast to many applications of ]s in automotive suspension designs, this type does not use the spring as a locating link. While this suspension type is most notably associated with several generations of the ] the design has been used in other production ] cars, as well as vehicles from ] and ] van. ] produced cars with a similar configuration, using a multi-leaf steel spring in place of the FRP mono-leaf spring.


== Design == == Design ==
] ] rear suspension]]
⚫ This suspension configuration is ] and utilizes control arms to define the motion of the wheel as the suspension is compressed. The coil springs are replaced with a single, FRP spring which spans the width of the car. As in independent suspension systems using coil springs, and unlike the common leaf spring supported Hotchkiss rear axle, the suspension ] are defined only by the control arms. Because the movement of one wheel is not determined by the position of the other this is an independent suspension type.<ref name=CB/>


⚫ The leaf-spring suspension configuration is ], because the movement of one wheel is not determined by the position of the other.<ref name=CB/> ]s are utilized to define the motion of the wheel as the suspension is compressed. The usual coil springs are replaced with a single FRP spring, which spans the width of the car. As in independent suspension systems using coil springs, and unlike the common leaf-spring supported ], the suspension ] are defined only by the control arms.
⚫ As in a coil spring suspension design, the FRP mono-leaf spring supports the weight of the vehicle. However, the FRP leaf springs differ from steel coils and traditional steel multi-leaf springs in a number of significant ways. The FRP plastic springs have 4.3–5.5 times the ] storage per weight as compared to steel.<ref name=Yu>{{cite journal |last1=Yu |first1=W.J. |last2=Kim |first2=H.C. |title=Double tapered FRP beam for automotive suspension leaf spring |journal=Composite Structures |year=1988 |volume=9 |issue=4 |pages=279–300 |doi=10.1016/0263-8223(88)90049-9}}</ref> This results in a lighter spring for a given application. The single FRP mono-leaf front spring used on the fourth generation Corvette weights 33&nbsp;percent of the weight of an equivalent set of coil springs.<ref name=Lamm>{{cite book |last1=Lamm |first1=Michael |title=The Newest Corvette. Corvette from A to Z-15 |date=1983 |publisher=Lamm-Morada Publishing |isbn=978-0932128041 |page=44 |edition=1st |url=http://www.carbibles.com/images/fibreglass_spring.gif}}</ref> FRP spring weight savings as compared to conventional leaf springs in similar applications are even greater. The third generation Corvette offered an optional FRP mono-leaf spring as an alternative to the standard multi-leaf steel spring. The {{convert|48|lb|kg|0|order=flip|adj=on}} steel spring was replaced by a {{convert|7|lb|kg|0|order=flip|adj=on}} mono-leaf spring.<ref name=McLellan>{{cite book |last1=McLellan |first1=Dave |title=Corvette from the Inside |date=2002 |publisher=Bentley Publishers |location=Cambridge, MA |isbn=0-8376-0859-7 |pages=86–87}}</ref> Volvo claims a weight savings of {{convert|10|lb|kg|0|order=flip}} by using a FRP spring in the rear suspension of the second generation ] as compared to designs using coil springs.<ref name=Volvo>{{cite web |title=Benteler-SGL mass-produces composite leaf springs for the new Volvo XC90 using Loctite Matrix resin from Henkel |url=http://compositesindustrynews.com/fullnews.php?ids=1298 |website=Composites Industry News |publisher=FRP Today |accessdate=2015-07-30}}{{dead link|date=November 2016}}</ref> In addition to reduction in vehicle weight, the weight of the spring is partly ].<ref name=CompWorld/>


⚫ As in a coil-spring suspension design, the FRP mono-leaf spring supports the weight of the vehicle. However, the FRP leaf springs differ from steel coils and traditional steel multi-leaf springs in a number of significant ways. The FRP plastic springs have 4.3–5.5 times the ] storage per weight, compared to steel.<ref name=Yu>{{cite journal |last1=Yu |first1=W.J. |last2=Kim |first2=H.C. |title=Double tapered FRP beam for automotive suspension leaf spring |journal=Composite Structures |year=1988 |volume=9 |issue=4 |pages=279–300 |doi=10.1016/0263-8223(88)90049-9}}</ref> This results in a lighter spring for a given application. The single FRP mono-leaf front spring used on the ] is 33&nbsp;percent of the weight of an equivalent set of coil springs.<ref name=Lamm>{{cite book |last1=Lamm |first1=Michael |title=The Newest Corvette. Corvette from A to Z-15 |url=http://www.carbibles.com/images/fibreglass_spring.gif |date=1983 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120219190009/http://www.carbibles.com/images/fibreglass_spring.gif |page=44 |edition=1st |publisher=Lamm-Morada Publishing |isbn=978-0932128041 |archive-date=February 19, 2012}}</ref> Comparing FRP to conventional steel leaf springs in similar applications, the weight saved is even greater. The ] offered an optional FRP mono-leaf spring as an alternative to the standard multi-leaf steel spring, the {{convert|48|lb|kg|0|order=flip|adj=on}} steel spring being replaced by a {{convert|7|lb|kg|0|order=flip|adj=on}} FRP spring.<ref name=McLellan>{{cite book |last1=McLellan |first1=Dave |title=Corvette from the Inside |date=2002 |publisher=Bentley Publishers |location=Cambridge, MA |isbn=0-8376-0859-7 |pages=86–87}}</ref> Volvo claims a weight savings of {{convert|10|lb|kg|0|order=flip}} by using a FRP spring in the rear suspension of its second-generation ], compared to designs using coil springs.<ref name=Volvo>{{cite web |title=Benteler-SGL mass-produces composite leaf springs for the new Volvo XC90 using Loctite Matrix resin from Henkel |url=http://compositesindustrynews.com/fullnews.php?ids=1298 |website=Composites Industry News |publisher=FRP Today |access-date=2015-07-30}}{{dead link|date=November 2016|reason=not at archive.org (as of May 2017)}}</ref>
⚫ The relative sliding movement of the leaves of a multi-leaf steel spring results in stiction based hysteresis with respect to spring compression. This stiction reduces suspension compliance and can compromise both ride quality and handling.<ref name=Knowles>{{cite book |last1=Knowles |first1=Don |title=Today's Technician: Automotive Suspension & Steering |date=2010 |publisher=Cengage Learning |page=115}}</ref> Lacking individual leaves, the mono-leaf spring avoids stiction.<ref name=Lamm/>


⚫ The relative sliding movement of the leaves of a multi-leaf steel spring results in stiction-based hysteresis with respect to spring compression. This stiction reduces suspension compliance and can compromise both ride quality and handling.<ref name=Knowles>{{cite book |last1=Knowles |first1=Don |title=Today's Technician: Automotive Suspension & Steering |date=2010 |publisher=Cengage Learning |page=115}}</ref> Lacking individual leaves, the mono-leaf spring avoids stiction.<ref name=Lamm/>
⚫ FRP springs are advertised as having exceptional cycle life and corrosion resistance.<ref name =Lamm/> A GM test comparing the third generation Corvette springs found the multi-leaf steel springs failed spec after 200,000 full travel cycles. The replacement FRP leaf spring showed no loss of performance after two million full cycles.<ref name=McLellan/>


⚫ FRP springs are advertised as having exceptional cycle life and corrosion resistance.<ref name =Lamm/> A GM test comparing the third-generation Corvette springs found that failure of the multi-leaf steel springs was likely after 200,000 full-travel cycles. The replacement FRP leaf spring showed no loss of performance after two million full cycles.<ref name=McLellan/>
⚫ Packaging is cited as both an advantage and disadvantage of the transverse FRP leaf spring as compared to coil springs depending on the application. The FRP spring is typically packed low in the suspension resulting in a low center of gravity. It also allows manufactures to avoid tall spring mounts thus resulting in a flatter load floor about the suspension.<ref name=Volvo/> James Schefter reports that as used on the C5 and later Corvettes the use of OEM coilover damper springs would have forced the chassis engineers to either vertically raise the shock towers or move them inward. In the rear this would have reduced trunk space. In the front this would have interfered with engine packaging. The use of the leaf spring allowed the spring to be placed out of the way under the chassis and while keeping the diameter of the shock absorber assembly to that of just the damper rather than damper and spring.<ref name=Schefter>{{cite book |last1=Schefter |first1=James |title=All Corvettes Are Red |date=1998 |publisher=Gallery Books |isbn=978-0671685010}}</ref> However, in other applications such as race car designs, the need to span the width of the vehicle result in significant design limitations. Coil and torsion springs present better packaging options for racing applications. FRP springs also have limited availability and selection as compared to coil spring.<ref name=Smith>{{cite book |last1=Smith |first1=Carroll |title=Engineer to Win |date=1984 |publisher=Motorbooks |isbn=9780879381868 |page=207 |quote=If I were involved in the design of a new passenger vehicle, however, I would give serious consideration to the use of a transverse composite single leaf spring of unidirectional glass or carbon filament in an epoxy matrix. This would be the lightest practical spring configuration and, although space constraints would seem to limit its use in racing, it should be perfectly feasible on road-going vehicles, from large trucks to small commuter cars. (Since I wrote this paragraph the new-generation Corvette has come out with just such a spring to control its independent suspension systems-at both end of the car.)}}</ref> Higher cost has also been cited as a disadvantage when compared to coil springs on production road cars.<ref name="Edmunds-2014">{{cite web |last1=Edmunds |first1=Dan |title=2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Z51 Suspension Walkaround |url=http://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/track-tests/2014-chevrolet-corvette-stingray-z51-suspension-walkaround.html |website=Edmunds |accessdate=2015-07-30}}</ref>

⚫ Packaging is cited as both an advantage and disadvantage of the transverse FRP leaf spring, as compared to coil springs, depending on the application. The FRP spring is typically set low in the suspension, resulting in a low center of gravity. It also allows manufacturers to avoid tall spring mounts, thus resulting in a flatter load floor about the suspension.<ref name=Volvo/> James Schefter reports that, as used on the C5 and later Corvettes, the use of OEM coilover damper springs would have forced the chassis engineers to either vertically raise the shock towers or move them inward. In the rear this would have reduced trunk space. In the front this would have interfered with engine packaging. The use of the leaf spring allowed the spring to be placed under the chassis, out of the way, while keeping the diameter of the shock-absorber assembly to that of just the damper, rather than damper and spring.<ref name=Schefter>{{cite book |last1=Schefter |first1=James |title=All Corvettes Are Red |date=1998 |publisher=Gallery Books |isbn=978-0671685010}}</ref> However, in other applications, such as race car designs, the need to span the width of the vehicle resulted in significant design limitations. Coil and torsion springs present better packaging options for racing applications. FRP springs also have limited availability and selection as compared to coil springs.<ref name=Smith>{{cite book |last1=Smith |first1=Carroll |title=Engineer to Win |date=1984 |publisher=Motorbooks |isbn=9780879381868 |page=207 |quote=If I were involved in the design of a new passenger vehicle, however, I would give serious consideration to the use of a transverse composite single leaf spring of unidirectional glass or carbon filament in an epoxy matrix. This would be the lightest practical spring configuration and, although space constraints would seem to limit its use in racing, it should be perfectly feasible on road-going vehicles, from large trucks to small commuter cars. (Since I wrote this paragraph the new-generation Corvette has come out with just such a spring to control its independent suspension systems-at both end of the car.)}}</ref> Higher cost has also been cited as a disadvantage, when comparing FRP springs to coil springs on production road cars.<ref name="Edmunds-2014">{{cite web |last1=Edmunds |first1=Dan |title=2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Z51 Suspension Walkaround |url=http://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/track-tests/2014-chevrolet-corvette-stingray-z51-suspension-walkaround.html |website=Edmunds |access-date=2015-07-30}}</ref>


== Properties == == Properties ==
] model of a leaf spring under load. The initial, unbent shape of the spring is shown as a silhouette box. An upward deflection on the right side of the spring results in a smaller upward movement on the left side.]] ] model of a leaf spring under load. The initial, unbent shape of the spring is shown as a silhouette box. An upward deflection on the right side of the spring results in a smaller upward movement on the left side.]]


A notable advantage of the FRP transverse leaf springs when supported with widely spaced, pivotable mounts is the ability to supplement or replace the anti-roll bar. Typically springs that provide a sufficient ] need a supplemental spring (the ]) to increase the suspension ]. The coupling of the two sides of the transverse leaf spring across the vehicle results in an anti-roll bar like behavior. Corvette engineers have cited this property as enabling the use of a lighter anti-roll bar<ref name=McLellan/> and even eliminating the rear anti-roll bar on some versions of the seventh generation Corvette.<ref name=Automobile>{{cite news |last1=Noordeloos |first1=Marc |title=Vette Engineering Manager Explains the C7 Chassis |url=http://www.automobilemag.com/features/news/2014-corvette-engineering-manager-dishes-on-the-c7s-chassis-206465/ |accessdate=2015-08-01 |work=Automobile Magazine}}</ref> An advantage of the FRP transverse leaf springs—when supported with widely spaced, pivotable mounts—is the ability to replace the anti-roll bar. Typically springs that provide a sufficient ] need a supplemental spring (the ]) to increase the suspension ]. The coupling of the two sides of the transverse leaf spring across the vehicle results in an anti-roll bar like behavior. Corvette engineers have cited this property as enabling the use of a lighter anti-roll bar,<ref name=McLellan/> and even eliminating the rear anti-roll bar on some versions of the seventh generation Corvette.<ref name=Automobile>{{cite news |last1=Noordeloos |first1=Marc |title=Vette Engineering Manager Explains the C7 Chassis |url=http://www.automobilemag.com/features/news/2014-corvette-engineering-manager-dishes-on-the-c7s-chassis-206465/ |access-date=2015-08-01 |work=Automobile Magazine}}</ref>


When either wheel is deflected upward, the center span of the spring (the portion between the pivotable mounts) deflects downward. If both wheels deflect upward at the same time (displacing the suspension in bump) the center section bends uniformly between the pivot mounts. In roll only one wheel is deflected upwards. This tends to try to form the center of the spring into an "S" like curve. The result is the wheel rate of one side of the suspension depends on the displacement of the other side.<ref name =Lamm/><ref name=McLellan/><ref name=Smith/> The extent to which the spring acts as an anti-roll bar depends on the distance between the pivot mounts and the rigidity of the pivot mounts.<ref name =Lamm/> When either wheel is deflected upward, the center span of the spring (the portion between the pivotable mounts) deflects downward. If both wheels deflect upward at the same time (for example, when hitting a bump in the road) the center section bends uniformly between the pivot mounts. In a roll, only one wheel is deflected upwards, which tends to form the center of the spring into an S-shaped curve. The result is that the wheel rate of one side of the suspension depends on the displacement of the other side.<ref name =Lamm/><ref name=McLellan/><ref name=Smith/> The extent to which the spring acts as an anti-roll bar depends on the distance between the pivot mounts and their rigidity.<ref name =Lamm/>


] ]


A simplified flat, rectangular spring illustrates this principle. Deflecting the right side of the spring results in the left side rising. In comparison, a rigid central mount (2nd and 3rd generation Corvette and other cars) shows no movement on one side when the other is deflected.<ref name=CB/> A simplified flat, rectangular spring illustrates this principle. Deflecting the right side of the spring results in the left side rising. By comparison, a rigid central mount (2nd and 3rd generation Corvettes and other cars) shows no movement on one side when the other is deflected.<ref name=CB/>


== Applications == == Applications ==
A number of manufactures have produced vehicles or concepts utilizing independent front or rear suspensions supported by transverse leaf springs that offer an anti-roll effect. A number of manufacturers have produced vehicles or concepts utilizing independent front or rear suspensions supported by transverse leaf springs that have an anti-roll effect.
* Chevrolet Corvette: C4 1984–1996 (front only), C5–C7, 1997–present (front and rear). * Chevrolet Corvette: ] 1984–1996 (front only, centrally mounted rear spring did not have the anti-roll effect)<!-- this article is specifically about versions of this suspension that use the twin, widely spaced spring mounts, not the single central mount such as used on the C3 and C4 rear suspensions -->, C5–C7, 1997–2019 (front and rear).
* ] cars: first generation (Lumina, Grand Prix, Regal, Cutlass Supreme). * ] cars: first generation (Lumina, Grand Prix, Regal, Cutlass Supreme).
* ] cars: (Eldorado, Toronado, Riviera, Reatta, Allante).<ref name=PopSci>{{cite news |last1=McCosh |first1=Dan |title=Luxury coupes: $24,000 a seat |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zQAAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA42&lpg=PA42&dq=GM+E-body+leaf+spring+transverse&source=bl&ots=uDS9ls_w7-&sig=8f_Z6OdAGQIhbHrabWuA-7eZsLg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CEcQ6AEwBmoVChMIx4OyheeGxwIVSW4-Ch0Syw1X#v=onepage&q=GM%20E-body%20leaf%20spring%20transverse&f=false |accessdate=2015-07-30 |work=Popular Science |date=April 1998}}</ref> * ] cars: (Eldorado, Toronado, Riviera, Reatta, Allante).<ref name=PopSci>{{cite news |last1=McCosh |first1=Dan |title=Luxury coupes: $24,000 a seat |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zQAAAAAAMBAJ&q=GM+E-body+leaf+spring+transverse&pg=PA42 |access-date=2015-07-30 |work=Popular Science |date=April 1998}}</ref>
* ] (from model year 1995) renamed to S90 (sedan)/V90 (wagon) from model year 1997 to 1998.<ref name=Schulon>{{cite news |last1=Schuon |first1=Marshal |title=Behind the Wheel/1995 Volvo 960; A Box That's Well Rounded |url=http://www.nytimes.com/1994/10/23/automobiles/behind-the-wheel-1995-volvo-960-a-box-that-s-well-rounded.html |accessdate=2015-07-30 |work=The New York Times |date=Oct 23, 1994}}</ref> * ] (from model year 1995) renamed to S90 (sedan)/V90 (wagon) from model year 1997 to 1998.<ref name=Schulon>{{cite news |last1=Schuon |first1=Marshal |title=Behind the Wheel/1995 Volvo 960; A Box That's Well Rounded |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1994/10/23/automobiles/behind-the-wheel-1995-volvo-960-a-box-that-s-well-rounded.html |access-date=2015-07-30 |work=The New York Times |date=Oct 23, 1994}}</ref>
* ] (second generation)<ref name=CandD>{{cite web |last1=Stoklosa |first1=Alexander |title=10 Things You Need to Know About the 2016 Volvo XC90 |url=http://blog.caranddriver.com/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-the-2016-volvo-xc90/ |website=Car and Driver |accessdate=2015-08-01}}</ref> * ] and ] (second generation).<ref name=CandD>{{cite web |last1=Stoklosa |first1=Alexander |title=10 Things You Need to Know About the 2016 Volvo XC90 |url=http://blog.caranddriver.com/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-the-2016-volvo-xc90/ |website=Car and Driver |access-date=2015-08-01 |archive-date=2017-12-29 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171229021116/https://blog.caranddriver.com/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-the-2016-volvo-xc90/ |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |language=en |url=https://www.materialstoday.com/composite-applications/news/volvo-xc90-features-polyurethane-composite-leaf/ |title=Volvo XC90 features polyurethane composite leaf spring |author=Amanda Jacob |date=15 October 2014 |access-date=2018-02-02 |archive-date=2018-02-02 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180202190441/https://www.materialstoday.com/composite-applications/news/volvo-xc90-features-polyurethane-composite-leaf/ |url-status=dead }}</ref>
* ] vans (front only, Hotchkiss in rear)<ref name=CW>{{cite web |last1=Wood |first1=Karen |title=Composite leaf springs: Saving weight in production suspension systems |url=http://www.compositesworld.com/articles/composite-leaf-springs-saving-weight-in-production-suspension-systems |website=Composites World |accessdate=2015-08-01}}</ref> * ] vans (front only, Hotchkiss in rear).<ref name=CW>{{cite web |last1=Wood |first1=Karen |title=Composite leaf springs: Saving weight in production suspension systems |url=http://www.compositesworld.com/articles/composite-leaf-springs-saving-weight-in-production-suspension-systems |website=Composites World |access-date=2015-08-01}}</ref>
* ]: 1969–1973 (Front only), Trailing arm with coil springs, panhard bar (Rear).
* ] Mk1-Mk3 (used with MacPherson Struts)<ref name=Smart>{{cite web |title=The Smart Fortwo Evolution |url=http://www.fq101.co.uk/data-a-reference/61-the-smart-evolution.html |accessdate=2015-08-01}}</ref>
* ], prototype<ref name=AutoIntel>{{cite web |title=Volkswagen : The 1-Litre Car |url=http://www.autointell-news.com/european_companies/volkswagen/vw_marke/volkswagen-concepts/volkswagen-1-liter/volkswagen-1-literauto-02.htm |website=Automotive Intelligence News |accessdate=2015-07-30}}</ref> * ] Mk1-Mk3 (used with MacPherson Struts).<ref name=Smart>{{cite web |title=The Smart Fortwo Evolution |url=http://www.fq101.co.uk/data-a-reference/61-the-smart-evolution.html |access-date=2015-08-01}}</ref>
* ], prototype.<ref name=AutoIntel>{{cite web |title=Volkswagen : The 1-Litre Car |url=http://www.autointell-news.com/european_companies/volkswagen/vw_marke/volkswagen-concepts/volkswagen-1-liter/volkswagen-1-literauto-02.htm |website=Automotive Intelligence News |access-date=2015-07-30}}</ref>
* ], a Swedish made, low volume roadster. Due to the anti-roll properties of the transverse leaf spring setup the car does not use a separate front anti-roll bar.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.lakritz.se/nyheter/INDIGO.PDF |title=The Successor: Indigo 3000 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20081216074553/http://www.lakritz.se/nyheter/INDIGO.PDF |archivedate=2008-12-16}}</ref> * ], a Swedish made, low volume roadster. Due to the anti-roll properties of the transverse leaf-spring, the car does not employ a separate front anti-roll bar.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.lakritz.se/nyheter/INDIGO.PDF |title=The Successor: Indigo 3000 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20081216074553/http://www.lakritz.se/nyheter/INDIGO.PDF |archivedate=2008-12-16}}</ref>
* The ] used a similar system with a more traditional mutli-leaf steal spring but configured with two pivots to provide the anti-roll effect described earlier.<ref name=Unique>{{cite web |title=How it Works: Suspension |url=http://www.uniquecarsandparts.com.au/how_it_works_suspension.htm |website=Unique Cars and Parts |accessdate=2015-08-01}}</ref> * ], which used a similar system with a more traditional multi-leaf steel spring but configured with two pivots to provide the anti-roll effect.<ref name=Unique>{{cite web |title=How it Works: Suspension |url=http://www.uniquecarsandparts.com.au/how_it_works_suspension.htm |website=Unique Cars and Parts |accessdate=2015-08-01}}</ref>
* Some later models of ] and ] used rear transverse steel leaf springs with anti-roll pivot mounts.
* ]. * ].


== Recent patents and related research == == Recent patents and related research ==
Several automotive companies have filed patents on suspension designs using a transverse composite leaf spring supported in a fashion similar to that of the Corvette. Several automotive companies have filed patents for suspension designs using a transverse composite leaf-spring supported in a fashion similar to that of the Corvette.
* Ford Global Technologies, 2006 patent #7029017, ''Wheel suspension for a motor vehicle with a transverse leaf spring''.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.google.com/patents?id=D0p3AAAAEBAJ&dq=7,029,017 |title=Patent US7029017 – Wheel suspension for a motor vehicle with a transverse leaf spring |publisher=Google |accessdate=2015-08-03}}</ref> * Ford Global Technologies, 2006, patent #7029017, ''Wheel suspension for a motor vehicle with a transverse leaf spring''.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://patents.google.com/patent/US7029017 |title=Patent US7029017 – Wheel suspension for a motor vehicle with a transverse leaf spring |access-date=2015-08-03}}</ref>
* Porsche AG, 2000 patent # 6029987, ''Front Axle for a Motor Vehicle''. Describes a strut suspension system supported by a transverse leaf spring system largely the same as that used by the Corvette. The Porsche patent mentions the beneficial stability effects of this arrangement<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.google.com/patents?id=1gkEAAAAEBAJ&zoom=4&pg=PA5#v=onepage&q=&f=false |title=Patent US6029987 – Front axle for a motor vehicle |publisher=Google |date=1997-05-26 |accessdate=2015-08-03}}</ref> * Porsche AG, 2000, patent # 6029987, ''Front Axle for a Motor Vehicle''. Describes a strut suspension system supported by a transverse leaf-spring system largely the same as that used by the Corvette. The Porsche patent mentions the beneficial stabilizing effects of this arrangement.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://patents.google.com/patent/US6029987 |title=Patent US6029987 – Front axle for a motor vehicle |date=1997-05-26 |access-date=2015-08-03}}</ref>
* Honda, 1992 ''Transverse leaf spring type suspension'' patent #5141209<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.google.com/patents?id=mFYkAAAAEBAJ&zoom=4&pg=PA1#v=onepage&q=&f=false |title=Patent US5141209 – Transverse leaf spring type suspension |publisher=Google |date=1988-11-30 |accessdate=2015-08-03}}</ref> * Honda, 1992, ''Transverse leaf spring type suspension'' patent #5141209.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://patents.google.com/patent/US5141209 |title=Patent US5141209 – Transverse leaf spring type suspension |date=1988-11-30 |access-date=2015-08-03}}</ref>
* DaimlerChrysler, 2004, patent #6811169, ''Composite Spring Design that also Performs the Lower Control Arm Function for a Conventional or Active Suspension System''<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.google.com/patents?id=3kYQAAAAEBAJ&zoom=4&pg=PA1#v=onepage&q=&f=false |title=Patent US6811169 – Composite spring design that also performs the lower control arm function for a conventional or active suspension system |publisher=Google |accessdate=2015-08-03}}</ref> * DaimlerChrysler, 2004, patent #6811169, ''Composite Spring Design that also Performs the Lower Control Arm Function for a Conventional or Active Suspension System''.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://patents.google.com/patent/US6811169 |title=Patent US6811169 – Composite spring design that also performs the lower control arm function for a conventional or active suspension system |access-date=2015-08-03}}</ref>
* ] released a concept rear suspension design in October 2009 using a composite spring based rear suspension. The strut based suspension uses a transverse leaf spring to function as both ride and anti-roll spring. The ZF concept differs from the system used on the Corvette by using the leaf spring as one of the suspension links.<ref>{{cite web |author=Plastic November 11th, 2009 admin |url=http://thatcarblog.com/?p=687 |title=Plastic |publisher=That Car Blog |date=2009-11-11 |accessdate=2015-08-03}}</ref> * ] released a concept rear suspension design, in October 2009, using a composite spring-based rear suspension. The strut-based suspension uses a transverse leaf spring to function as both ride and anti-roll spring. The ZF concept differs from the system used on the Corvette by using the leaf spring as one of the suspension links.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Buchholz |first1=Kami |title=Composites take prime chassis roles at ZF |url=http://articles.sae.org/7840/ |access-date=December 22, 2016 |publisher=Society of Automotive Engineers |date=March 31, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Lightweight Construction: Fighting the Fab |url=https://www.zf.com/corporate/en_de/magazine/magazin_artikel_viewpage_22131368.html |website=ZF Company corporate website |publisher=ZF Company |access-date=December 22, 2016}}</ref>


== See also == == See also ==
Line 54: Line 58:
] ]
] ]
]

Latest revision as of 16:59, 9 June 2024

Type of independent suspension

A Corvette leaf spring is a type of independent suspension that utilizes a fiber-reinforced plastic (FRP) mono-leaf spring instead of more conventional coil springs. It is named after the Chevrolet Corvette, the American sports car for which it was originally developed and first utilized. A notable characteristic of this suspension configuration is the mounting of the mono-leaf spring such that it can serve as both ride spring and anti-roll spring. In contrast to many applications of leaf springs in automotive suspension designs, this type does not use the spring as a locating link. While this suspension type is most notably associated with several generations of the Chevrolet Corvette the design has been used in other production General Motors cars, as well as vehicles from Volvo Cars and Mercedes-Benz Sprinter van. Fiat produced cars with a similar configuration, using a multi-leaf steel spring in place of the FRP mono-leaf spring.

Design

The C5 Corvette's rear suspension

The leaf-spring suspension configuration is independent, because the movement of one wheel is not determined by the position of the other. Control arms are utilized to define the motion of the wheel as the suspension is compressed. The usual coil springs are replaced with a single FRP spring, which spans the width of the car. As in independent suspension systems using coil springs, and unlike the common leaf-spring supported Hotchkiss rear axle, the suspension kinematics are defined only by the control arms.

As in a coil-spring suspension design, the FRP mono-leaf spring supports the weight of the vehicle. However, the FRP leaf springs differ from steel coils and traditional steel multi-leaf springs in a number of significant ways. The FRP plastic springs have 4.3–5.5 times the strain energy storage per weight, compared to steel. This results in a lighter spring for a given application. The single FRP mono-leaf front spring used on the fourth-generation Corvette is 33 percent of the weight of an equivalent set of coil springs. Comparing FRP to conventional steel leaf springs in similar applications, the weight saved is even greater. The third-generation Corvette offered an optional FRP mono-leaf spring as an alternative to the standard multi-leaf steel spring, the 22-kilogram (48 lb) steel spring being replaced by a 3-kilogram (7 lb) FRP spring. Volvo claims a weight savings of 5 kilograms (10 lb) by using a FRP spring in the rear suspension of its second-generation XC90, compared to designs using coil springs.

The relative sliding movement of the leaves of a multi-leaf steel spring results in stiction-based hysteresis with respect to spring compression. This stiction reduces suspension compliance and can compromise both ride quality and handling. Lacking individual leaves, the mono-leaf spring avoids stiction.

FRP springs are advertised as having exceptional cycle life and corrosion resistance. A GM test comparing the third-generation Corvette springs found that failure of the multi-leaf steel springs was likely after 200,000 full-travel cycles. The replacement FRP leaf spring showed no loss of performance after two million full cycles.

Packaging is cited as both an advantage and disadvantage of the transverse FRP leaf spring, as compared to coil springs, depending on the application. The FRP spring is typically set low in the suspension, resulting in a low center of gravity. It also allows manufacturers to avoid tall spring mounts, thus resulting in a flatter load floor about the suspension. James Schefter reports that, as used on the C5 and later Corvettes, the use of OEM coilover damper springs would have forced the chassis engineers to either vertically raise the shock towers or move them inward. In the rear this would have reduced trunk space. In the front this would have interfered with engine packaging. The use of the leaf spring allowed the spring to be placed under the chassis, out of the way, while keeping the diameter of the shock-absorber assembly to that of just the damper, rather than damper and spring. However, in other applications, such as race car designs, the need to span the width of the vehicle resulted in significant design limitations. Coil and torsion springs present better packaging options for racing applications. FRP springs also have limited availability and selection as compared to coil springs. Higher cost has also been cited as a disadvantage, when comparing FRP springs to coil springs on production road cars.

Properties

FEA model of a leaf spring under load. The initial, unbent shape of the spring is shown as a silhouette box. An upward deflection on the right side of the spring results in a smaller upward movement on the left side.

An advantage of the FRP transverse leaf springs—when supported with widely spaced, pivotable mounts—is the ability to replace the anti-roll bar. Typically springs that provide a sufficient ride rate need a supplemental spring (the anti-roll bar) to increase the suspension roll rate. The coupling of the two sides of the transverse leaf spring across the vehicle results in an anti-roll bar like behavior. Corvette engineers have cited this property as enabling the use of a lighter anti-roll bar, and even eliminating the rear anti-roll bar on some versions of the seventh generation Corvette.

When either wheel is deflected upward, the center span of the spring (the portion between the pivotable mounts) deflects downward. If both wheels deflect upward at the same time (for example, when hitting a bump in the road) the center section bends uniformly between the pivot mounts. In a roll, only one wheel is deflected upwards, which tends to form the center of the spring into an S-shaped curve. The result is that the wheel rate of one side of the suspension depends on the displacement of the other side. The extent to which the spring acts as an anti-roll bar depends on the distance between the pivot mounts and their rigidity.

A transverse leaf spring with a central rigid mount. The two spring halves are effectively isolated. Movements of one half of the spring do not affect the other half.

A simplified flat, rectangular spring illustrates this principle. Deflecting the right side of the spring results in the left side rising. By comparison, a rigid central mount (2nd and 3rd generation Corvettes and other cars) shows no movement on one side when the other is deflected.

Applications

A number of manufacturers have produced vehicles or concepts utilizing independent front or rear suspensions supported by transverse leaf springs that have an anti-roll effect.

Recent patents and related research

Several automotive companies have filed patents for suspension designs using a transverse composite leaf-spring supported in a fashion similar to that of the Corvette.

  • Ford Global Technologies, 2006, patent #7029017, Wheel suspension for a motor vehicle with a transverse leaf spring.
  • Porsche AG, 2000, patent # 6029987, Front Axle for a Motor Vehicle. Describes a strut suspension system supported by a transverse leaf-spring system largely the same as that used by the Corvette. The Porsche patent mentions the beneficial stabilizing effects of this arrangement.
  • Honda, 1992, Transverse leaf spring type suspension patent #5141209.
  • DaimlerChrysler, 2004, patent #6811169, Composite Spring Design that also Performs the Lower Control Arm Function for a Conventional or Active Suspension System.
  • ZF released a concept rear suspension design, in October 2009, using a composite spring-based rear suspension. The strut-based suspension uses a transverse leaf spring to function as both ride and anti-roll spring. The ZF concept differs from the system used on the Corvette by using the leaf spring as one of the suspension links.

See also

References

  1. Corvette - The Great American Sports Car - Staff of Old Cars Weekly. F+W Media. 1975-10-02. p. 81. ISBN 9781440217647. Retrieved 2016-11-14.
  2. "The Top 5 Technological Advancements In Corvette History". Corvette Online. 2015-05-16. Retrieved 2016-11-14.
  3. "Chevrolet Corvette History". Edmunds.com. Retrieved 2016-11-14.
  4. "Composite leaf springs: Saving weight in production suspension systems". CompositesWorld. 2014-02-03. Retrieved 2016-11-14.
  5. "ACMA: Automotive Composites Alliance - Auto Composites 101: History of Automotive Composites". Autocomposites.org. Archived from the original on 2017-01-17. Retrieved 2016-11-14.
  6. ^ Chris Longhurst (2016-10-26). "The Suspension Bible". Car Bibles. Archived from the original on 2007-02-06. Retrieved 2016-11-14.
  7. Yu, W.J.; Kim, H.C. (1988). "Double tapered FRP beam for automotive suspension leaf spring". Composite Structures. 9 (4): 279–300. doi:10.1016/0263-8223(88)90049-9.
  8. ^ Lamm, Michael (1983). The Newest Corvette. Corvette from A to Z-15 (1st ed.). Lamm-Morada Publishing. p. 44. ISBN 978-0932128041. Archived from the original on February 19, 2012.
  9. ^ McLellan, Dave (2002). Corvette from the Inside. Cambridge, MA: Bentley Publishers. pp. 86–87. ISBN 0-8376-0859-7.
  10. ^ "Benteler-SGL mass-produces composite leaf springs for the new Volvo XC90 using Loctite Matrix resin from Henkel". Composites Industry News. FRP Today. Retrieved 2015-07-30.
  11. Knowles, Don (2010). Today's Technician: Automotive Suspension & Steering. Cengage Learning. p. 115.
  12. Schefter, James (1998). All Corvettes Are Red. Gallery Books. ISBN 978-0671685010.
  13. ^ Smith, Carroll (1984). Engineer to Win. Motorbooks. p. 207. ISBN 9780879381868. If I were involved in the design of a new passenger vehicle, however, I would give serious consideration to the use of a transverse composite single leaf spring of unidirectional glass or carbon filament in an epoxy matrix. This would be the lightest practical spring configuration and, although space constraints would seem to limit its use in racing, it should be perfectly feasible on road-going vehicles, from large trucks to small commuter cars. (Since I wrote this paragraph the new-generation Corvette has come out with just such a spring to control its independent suspension systems-at both end of the car.)
  14. Edmunds, Dan. "2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Z51 Suspension Walkaround". Edmunds. Retrieved 2015-07-30.
  15. Noordeloos, Marc. "Vette Engineering Manager Explains the C7 Chassis". Automobile Magazine. Retrieved 2015-08-01.
  16. McCosh, Dan (April 1998). "Luxury coupes: $24,000 a seat". Popular Science. Retrieved 2015-07-30.
  17. Schuon, Marshal (Oct 23, 1994). "Behind the Wheel/1995 Volvo 960; A Box That's Well Rounded". The New York Times. Retrieved 2015-07-30.
  18. Stoklosa, Alexander. "10 Things You Need to Know About the 2016 Volvo XC90". Car and Driver. Archived from the original on 2017-12-29. Retrieved 2015-08-01.
  19. Amanda Jacob (15 October 2014). "Volvo XC90 features polyurethane composite leaf spring". Archived from the original on 2018-02-02. Retrieved 2018-02-02.
  20. Wood, Karen. "Composite leaf springs: Saving weight in production suspension systems". Composites World. Retrieved 2015-08-01.
  21. "The Smart Fortwo Evolution". Retrieved 2015-08-01.
  22. "Volkswagen : The 1-Litre Car". Automotive Intelligence News. Retrieved 2015-07-30.
  23. "The Successor: Indigo 3000" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-12-16.
  24. "How it Works: Suspension". Unique Cars and Parts. Retrieved 2015-08-01.
  25. "Patent US7029017 – Wheel suspension for a motor vehicle with a transverse leaf spring". Retrieved 2015-08-03.
  26. "Patent US6029987 – Front axle for a motor vehicle". 1997-05-26. Retrieved 2015-08-03.
  27. "Patent US5141209 – Transverse leaf spring type suspension". 1988-11-30. Retrieved 2015-08-03.
  28. "Patent US6811169 – Composite spring design that also performs the lower control arm function for a conventional or active suspension system". Retrieved 2015-08-03.
  29. Buchholz, Kami (March 31, 2010). "Composites take prime chassis roles at ZF". Society of Automotive Engineers. Retrieved December 22, 2016.
  30. "Lightweight Construction: Fighting the Fab". ZF Company corporate website. ZF Company. Retrieved December 22, 2016.
Categories: