Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard: Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 18:08, 2 January 2017 editDrmies (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators406,553 edits →Arbitration motion regarding Captain Occam ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 00:28, 1 January 2025 edit undoAhri Boy (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users3,124 edits →Change to the CheckUser team, January 2025 Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Front matter}}		<noinclude>{{pp-move-indef}}</noinclude>{{Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Front matter}}{{ArbCom navigation}}
	<!-- Archive date of 10 days has been agreed amongst arbitrators and clerks. Do not change without discussion. -->		<!-- Archive date of 10 days has been agreed amongst arbitrators and clerks. Do not change without discussion. -->
			{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
			\|target=Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive index
			\|mask=Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive <#>
			\|leading_zeros=0
			\|indexhere=yes
			}}
	{{User:MiszaBot/config		{{User:MiszaBot/config
	\|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}		\|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
	\|maxarchivesize = ~~250K~~		\|maxarchivesize = 500k
	\|counter = 33		\|counter = 52
	\|minthreadsleft = 0		\|minthreadsleft = 0
	\|minthreadstoarchive = 1		\|minthreadstoarchive = 1
Line 10:		Line 16:
	\|archive = Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive %(counter)d		\|archive = Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive %(counter)d
	}}		}}
			'''Behaviour on this page:''' This page is for discussing announcements relating to the Arbitration Committee. Editors commenting here are required to act with appropriate decorum. While grievances, complaints, or criticism of arbitration decisions are frequently posted here, you are expected to present them without being rude or hostile. Comments that are uncivil may be removed without warning. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or the clerks, will be met with sanctions.

	__TOC__		__TOC__
			== Change to the CheckUser team, January 2025 ==

			: ]<!-- ] (]) 00:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->
	== Arbitration motion regarding ''Palestine-Israel articles 3'' ==
			*Farewell Ferret. Your service has made us even better. ] (]) 00:28, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

	<!-- ''']''' (<small>aka</small> ] '''·''' ] '''·''' ]) 04:24, 26 December 2016 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->
	: ]
	::Could a committee member or clerk clarify the effect of this announcement, i.e. what's different from before? It doesn't look any different from what I remember about the previous state of things, so I'm wondering if it's basically just giving an authoritative interpretation and additional details about something that was unclear before. ] (]) 14:25, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
	:::{{re\|Nyttend}} It provides (a) clarification on what to do with new articles (or rather that we don't ''have'' to delete them), and more importantly, (b) clarification that the restriction does not apply to talk pages. The previous wording technically was equivalent to a topic ban, including talk pages, user talk, etc. ~ ]<sup style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">]</sup> 14:44, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
	::::Thanks for the details. I just would appreciate it if the Committee would provide some sort of one- or two-sentence preamble: "Because there's been confusion about X in our original decision, here's a clarification" or "Because Y in our original decision seemingly isn't needed anymore, here's a change". Obviously this wouldn't always be appropriate, e.g. one of those announcements that says "Remedy 8.1 in the ''Alice v. Bob'' case is repealed", but it would be helpful in cases like these when there are a bunch of statements. ] (]) 01:42, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
	:::::That's a good suggestion. It would definitely be clearer for folks who have not been following along at ARCA but who see the notices here. ] <small>]</small> 02:55, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
	::::::And more to my point (selfishly :-), clearer for folks like me who pay no attention to Arbcom matters until they reach WP:AN; aside from ], I can't remember ever looking at a case that's in progress. ] (]) 03:31, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
	:::::::Fair enough, the point remains that more descriptive notices could be valuable. :) ] <small>]</small> 04:09, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

	== Arbitration motion regarding ''Palestine-Israel articles'' ==

	<!-- ''']''' (<small>aka</small> ] '''·''' ] '''·''' ]) 22:36, 26 December 2016 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->
	: ]

	== Arbitration motion regarding Captain Occam ==

	<!-- ] (]) 05:12, 1 January 2017 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->
	:]
	::It occurred to me that someone might ask, so: this is a decision of the 2016 committee that just hadn't been actioned till now. ] (]) 05:19, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
	:::I assume this appeal was heard privately, so there is no visible Arbcom discussion? Even so, I recommend the result be logged in ]. Otherwise there is no place admins can go to look up status of this ban. Also, when you say 'unbanned' I guess you are saying that the site-ban was lifted. So the R&I topic ban stays in place with a bit of wordsmithing (plus some interaction bans) but otherwise Captain Occam can resume editing Misplaced Pages. There is also a ban entry for Captain Occam in ] which should probably be updated with a link to the new motion. ] (]) 15:33, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
	::::Done by {{u\|L235}}: , . Usually the clerks do that paperwork; I for one would screw it up ;) ] (]) 23:02, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
	:Is there any reason ] should not continue to apply to Occam & Ferahgo? ] (]) 16:06, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
	:I'm not sure where I should be requesting this: could an admin please unprotect my userpage? It was fully protected while I was banned. --] (]) 16:16, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
	::{{Done}} <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em;" class="texhtml"> ''']'''</span> ] 16:20, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
	*I guess it would have been nice to have an appeal open to the community, 'cause I think this decision of the committee is a rather bad one, and will not benefit Misplaced Pages. We shall see. ] (]) 22:48, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
	:*], we can't always do everything out in the open, but that's a general statement, as you know. Strictly speaking the ArbCom route is a valid route--the community may well come back in if future behavior is troubling. Speaking only for myself, I try to see the good in people, and while I'm frequently disappointed (in myself even more than in others) I am a big fan of creating conditions whereby we bring editors back in. We shall see, indeed. There is no doubt that the return of a formerly editor can cause friction, but that's the nature of collaborative editing. I hope for the best. Thanks, and happy new year, ] (]) 18:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:28, 1 January 2025

Shortcuts

What this page is for:: This page is for discussion of formal announcements by the Committee, including clarification of the specifics of notices.
What this page is not for:: To request arbitration, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests. For information on the Committee, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee. To report a violation of a Committee decision, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement.

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Misplaced Pages Arbitration

About arbitration Talk Arbitration policy (CU/OS) Guide to arbitration Noticeboard + Talk Search archived proceedings Ban appeals Report
Open proceedings All open requests Case requests Clarification and Amendment requests Arbitrator motion requests Enforcement requests
Active sanctions Contentious topics (Log) General sanctions Editor sanctions
Arbitration Committee Discuss + Contact Members Procedures Elections Talk History Clerks + Talk Clerk procedures Conflict of interest reports
Audit Talk Statistics Talk Reports (pre-2016)

Track related changes
v t e

Behaviour on this page: This page is for discussing announcements relating to the Arbitration Committee. Editors commenting here are required to act with appropriate decorum. While grievances, complaints, or criticism of arbitration decisions are frequently posted here, you are expected to present them without being rude or hostile. Comments that are uncivil may be removed without warning. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or the clerks, will be met with sanctions.

Change to the CheckUser team, January 2025

Original announcement

Farewell Ferret. Your service has made us even better. Ahri Boy (talk) 00:28, 1 January 2025 (UTC)