Misplaced Pages

:Requests for mediation/Shining Path: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:55, 15 September 2006 editAAAAA (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,580 edits →Issues to be mediated: Better explanation of the issue← Previous edit Latest revision as of 04:30, 3 March 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(32 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Shining Path== ==Shining Path==
{{closed case|10:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)|Mediation has stalled; case is stale.}}

<div class="plainlinks" style="text-align: right; font-size: 75%; width: 21%; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid #aaaaaa; float: right; padding: 10px;"> <div class="plainlinks" style="text-align: right; font-size: 75%; width: 21%; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid #aaaaaa; float: right; padding: 10px;">
Line 22: Line 24:


===Issues to be mediated=== ===Issues to be mediated===
*Whether the article should begin with the name this group wants to call itself in bold, which is the Communist Party of Peru, considering that there are several other Peruvian political groups that refer to themselves with the same name, or whether it should begin with the name that most English speakers use when referring to it, which is Shining Path (English for "Sendero Luminoso"). Please note that this is not a dispute on where the article should be; everyone seems to pretty much agree that it should be at ]. *Whether the article should begin with the official name of the group in bold, which is the Communist Party of Peru, or whether it should begin with the name that most English speakers use when referring to it, which is Shining Path. Please note that this is not a dispute on where the article should be; everyone seems to pretty much agree that it should be at ].
⚫ *Whether the article should link to ] or if it should link to ]


===Additional issues to be mediated=== ===Additional issues to be mediated===
** (referring to ] first item) Descendall is already tilting the question to the answer he is looking for. This "issue" should read:
⚫ Whether the article should link to ], the Swedish wikipedia page for the group, or if it should link to ], a redirect page.
***''Whether the article should begin with the name this group wants to call itself in bold, which is the Communist Party of Peru, considering that there are several other Peruvian political groups that refer to themselves with the same name(see ]), or whether it should begin with the name that most English speakers use when referring to it, which is Shining Path (English for "Sendero Luminoso"). Please note that this is not a dispute on where the article should be; everyone seems to pretty much agree that it should be at ].''
** (referring to ] first item) This question is ALSO tilted in a way that let's Descendall get the answer he is looking for. It should read:''
***''Whether the article should link to ], the correct Swedish wikipedia page for the group, or if it should link to ], a redirect page.''''
**Furthermore, SOMAN is also imposing his will in the Swedish Page, and reverting from Shining Path to Communist Party of Peru.--] 02:06, 16 September 2006 (UTC)


===Parties' agreement to mediate=== ===Parties' agreement to mediate===
Line 31: Line 38:
*Agree --] 03:26, 14 September 2006 (UTC) *Agree --] 03:26, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
*Agree. --] ]/] 12:39, 14 September 2006 (UTC) *Agree. --] ]/] 12:39, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
*Agree.----] 04:03, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
*Agree.----] 19:38, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
*Agree.--] 09:39, 18 September 2006 (UTC)


===Decision of the Mediation Committee=== ===Decision of the Mediation Committee===
*'''Accept''':
*'''Accept/Reject/Extend''': Reason for rejection (if rejected), additional required information (if extended.)
::''For the Mediation Committee,'' (Mediation Committee members only.) ::''For the Mediation Committee,'' —]] 04:03, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Assuming this isn't a stale issue, I'd be willing to mediate this case. Please indicate whether you agree to me mediating below, as well as whether you would prefer public or ] (email) mediation. If it's a stale issue, just say so. Thanks! ] (]|]) 14:35, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
:Barring any disagreement from the other parties, I'm certainly fine with you mediating the dispute. As I told you on your talk page, this issue is far from moot. --] 19:41, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
: Accept, and as I said above I don't care about public or private. - ] | ] 01:56, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
:Accept, don't care if it's public or private.--] ]/] 22:04, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
:Accept, Public OK for me.--] 02:36, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
:: Waiting for response from ].... ] (]|]) 03:51, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
:Accept, I prefer public mediation. --] 09:51, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
:: Thanks to all of you. Beginning mediation ]. ] (]|]) 23:11, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
:Closed as stale. <span style="font-family: Verdana">] ]</span> 10:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)


<!-- Do not remove this category. It is essential to the case management bot. --> <!-- Do not remove this category. It is essential to the case management bot. -->
{{Closed case/bottom}}
<noinclude>]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 04:30, 3 March 2023

Shining Path

Mediation of this dispute has been completed. The case pages should not be edited.
Resolved:

Mediation has stalled; case is stale.

This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.

view edit delete watch
Filed: 03:23, September 14 2006 (UTC)

Involved parties

Articles involved

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

  • This has literally been debated on Talk:Shining Path since at least June 2003. No real consensus has ever been reached, and the issue has come under fairly intense debate on that page for the past month and a half. I don't think anything short of mediation will allow for a genuine consensus to be built.

Issues to be mediated

  • Whether the article should begin with the official name of the group in bold, which is the Communist Party of Peru, or whether it should begin with the name that most English speakers use when referring to it, which is Shining Path. Please note that this is not a dispute on where the article should be; everyone seems to pretty much agree that it should be at Shining Path.
  • Whether the article should link to sv:Perus kommunistiska parti or if it should link to sv:Den lysande stigen

Additional issues to be mediated

    • (referring to Descendall's first item) Descendall is already tilting the question to the answer he is looking for. This "issue" should read:
      • Whether the article should begin with the name this group wants to call itself in bold, which is the Communist Party of Peru, considering that there are several other Peruvian political groups that refer to themselves with the same name(see Communism in Peru), or whether it should begin with the name that most English speakers use when referring to it, which is Shining Path (English for "Sendero Luminoso"). Please note that this is not a dispute on where the article should be; everyone seems to pretty much agree that it should be at Shining Path.
    • (referring to Descendall's first item) This question is ALSO tilted in a way that let's Descendall get the answer he is looking for. It should read:
    • Furthermore, SOMAN is also imposing his will in the Swedish Page, and reverting from Shining Path to Communist Party of Peru.--AAAAA 02:06, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

Decision of the Mediation Committee

  • Accept:
For the Mediation Committee, —Guanaco 04:03, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Assuming this isn't a stale issue, I'd be willing to mediate this case. Please indicate whether you agree to me mediating below, as well as whether you would prefer public or private (email) mediation. If it's a stale issue, just say so. Thanks! Armedblowfish (talk|mail) 14:35, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Barring any disagreement from the other parties, I'm certainly fine with you mediating the dispute. As I told you on your talk page, this issue is far from moot. --Descendall 19:41, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Accept, and as I said above I don't care about public or private. - Jmabel | Talk 01:56, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Accept, don't care if it's public or private.--Cúchullain /c 22:04, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Accept, Public OK for me.--AAAAA 02:36, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Waiting for response from Soman.... Armedblowfish (talk|mail) 03:51, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Accept, I prefer public mediation. --Soman 09:51, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks to all of you. Beginning mediation here. Armedblowfish (talk|mail) 23:11, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Closed as stale. Essjay (Talk) 10:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Category: