| Revision as of 09:42, 15 September 2006 editKacie Jane (talk | contribs)13,639 edits new nomination | Latest revision as of 02:46, 11 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (16 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate mfd" style="background-color: #E3D2FB; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!-- | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to miscellany page for deletion, you must manually edit the MfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result of the debate was {{{1|}}} '''Delete'''. ] 02:00, 21 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ====]==== | ====]==== | ||
| Poorly constructed page for WikiProject with only one participant on a town with a population of 14,000. The only thing this "project" has done in the time it's existed is created four stub articles on non-notable streets, all of which are presently up for AfD (], ], ], and ] and are being deleted soundly. ] <sup>]</sup> 09:42, 15 September 2006 (UTC) | Poorly constructed page for WikiProject with only one participant on a town with a population of 14,000. The only thing this "project" has done in the time it's existed is created four stub articles on non-notable streets, all of which are presently up for AfD (], ], ], and ] and are being deleted soundly. ] <sup>]</sup> 09:42, 15 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :If this is deleted, the following should also be deleted: | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*] | |||
| :-- ] <sup>]</sup> 09:51, 15 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Extremely qualified Keep'''. I agree that the project is poorly constructed, and certainly the fact that it's only stated goal is to make pages for streets like the ones being recommended for deletion is not a point in its favor. However, '''if''' the project were better designed and specified goals which are in keeping with wikipedia policy, like creating articles on notable buildings and residents, significant figures in local government and history, etc., I think it might well attract at least some input from other editors. I suggest that the project's creator look over the ] and/or other material on how to create an effective project and perhaps revise some of its goals to be more in keeping with wikipedia policy, the project might draw the support of other editors as well. ] 15:42, 15 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| **That was a bad idea i understand-but there is still other things i can do. ] 18:31, 15 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete'''. There is absolutely no need for this. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
| *'''Delete''', ]. A town of 14,000 people (or even 200,000 - there is no WikiProject Richmond, Virginia, for instance) doesn't need an entire WikiProject devoted to it. It's at least too narrow a scope for a wikiproject. --''']]]''' <small>]</small> 22:28, 15 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' per Coredesat ] 22:41, 15 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' while I agree with ] that it could work in theory if cleaned up, I don't think we have enough residents of Highland Park with enough civic pride to make it work (1 isn't enough). ]] 00:04, 16 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete'''. I ''can'' imagine that once even small towns may have very deep Wiki coverage but this is not feasible under current MediaWiki. Ten years from now, maybe. ] 18:56, 16 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' per others. ] 05:55, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div> | |||
Latest revision as of 02:46, 11 February 2023
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Xoloz 02:00, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Highland Park, New Jersey
Poorly constructed page for WikiProject with only one participant on a town with a population of 14,000. The only thing this "project" has done in the time it's existed is created four stub articles on non-notable streets, all of which are presently up for AfD (here, here, here, and here and are being deleted soundly. NORTH 09:42, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- If this is deleted, the following should also be deleted:
- -- NORTH 09:51, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- Extremely qualified Keep. I agree that the project is poorly constructed, and certainly the fact that it's only stated goal is to make pages for streets like the ones being recommended for deletion is not a point in its favor. However, if the project were better designed and specified goals which are in keeping with wikipedia policy, like creating articles on notable buildings and residents, significant figures in local government and history, etc., I think it might well attract at least some input from other editors. I suggest that the project's creator look over the Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Council/Guide and/or other material on how to create an effective project and perhaps revise some of its goals to be more in keeping with wikipedia policy, the project might draw the support of other editors as well. Badbilltucker 15:42, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- That was a bad idea i understand-but there is still other things i can do. Mitchazenia 18:31, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. There is absolutely no need for this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hurricanehink (talk • contribs)
- Delete, Misplaced Pages is not a directory. A town of 14,000 people (or even 200,000 - there is no WikiProject Richmond, Virginia, for instance) doesn't need an entire WikiProject devoted to it. It's at least too narrow a scope for a wikiproject. --Coredesat talk! 22:28, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Coredesat Hello32020 22:41, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete while I agree with Badbilltucker that it could work in theory if cleaned up, I don't think we have enough residents of Highland Park with enough civic pride to make it work (1 isn't enough). Yomangani 00:04, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. I can imagine that once even small towns may have very deep Wiki coverage but this is not feasible under current MediaWiki. Ten years from now, maybe. Pavel Vozenilek 18:56, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per others. Punkmorten 05:55, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.