| Revision as of 11:17, 15 September 2006 editJoehazelton (talk | contribs)313 editsm →This is an encyclopedia not her campaign web site← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 08:27, 11 November 2024 edit undoTom.Reding (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors3,797,893 editsm →top: merge blp/living/activepol params into blp=activepol; cleanupTag: AWB |
| (634 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{WPBiography|living=yes|class=|importance=}} |
|
|
|
{{FailedGA|02:49, 13 January 2013 (UTC)|topic=Politics and government|page=1}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Top 25 Report|Jul 5 2020}} |
|
{{activepol|Veteran running for lower house of the Federal Legislature in possibly competitive district}} |
|
|
|
{{Annual readership}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{American English}} |
|
==Debates== |
|
|
|
{{Section sizes}} |
|
Information about the debates which Ms. Duckworth has declined should be added. |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=activepol|class=B|listas=Duckworth, Tammy| |
|
These are noteworthy and important information regarding the November, 2006 election. |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Women in Red|184|150}} |
|
see... {{unsigned|130.94.134.222}} |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography|old-peer-review=yes|politician-work-group=yes|politician-priority=Low|military-work-group=yes|military-priority=Low|needs-infobox=no}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Illinois|importance=Low}} |
|
:I think that would set a new precedent in Misplaced Pages. An encyclopedia lists what a person has done, usually not what they haven't done. Should we mention that Duckworth hasn't been investigated by the Illinois Attorney General? Should we mention that Duckworth hasn't violated FEC reporting requirements? How about the article for opponent, Peter Roskam, should we mention that he has refused to articulate his position on Social Security? That sounds like the mother of all slippery slopes to me. For now, I will delete your tag, unless you can come up with a very compelling argument. Thanks. ] 14:24, 4 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Chicago|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Hawaii|importance=low}} |
|
:: Based on your precedents, the Eric Zorn blogs entries on the Roskam pages in particular, should you decide to remove the Tom Beven blog ( Mr. Beven has a website for his commentary, as Mr. Zorn does) entries from the Ducktworth page. Propol, you can't have it both ways, either you allow or disallow such entries. You can't chose only positive ones for Duckworth and the negative ones for Roskam.{{unsigned|207.195.254.185}} |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Military history |class=B |B-Class-1=yes<!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes<!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes<!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes<!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes |US-task-force=yes |Aviation-task-force=yes}} |
|
Also, the Beven information is corroborated with Chicago suburban news paper article. So it's citation is correct.{{unsigned|207.195.254.185}} |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Women's History|importance=low}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{WikiProject U.S. Congress|importance=Mid|subject=person}} |
|
== This is an encyclopedia not her campaign web site == |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Disability}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Pritzker-GLAM|importance=Mid}} |
|
This article reads like it was written by her campaign staff. I will probably be attacked for "attacking" a disabled veteran, and I acknowledge that Maj. Duckworth is a true American hero, but this article is very POV. --] 02:03, 15 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Asian Americans |importance=High}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Politics |importance=Low |American=yes|American-importance=low}} |
|
:What specific changes would you like to see made to the article? I'm certainly willing to work with you. ] 05:12, 15 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Women}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{WikiProject United States|importance=low|AsianAmericans=yes|AsianAmericans-importance=mid}} |
|
::MY answer is most of it... every thing below "Military service" read like a Tammy Duckworth campaign flyer with absolutely no balance or NPOV. Now, for starters, and one that defies logical argument is the simple question... How do you Swiftboat..see ] for details, a real live war hero??? The implications are made with staining allegations and unverified speculations from bloggers and left leaning editorial commentators. No verified facts, just pure Ad Hominem attack with a good dose of . |
|
|
|
}} |
|
::Finally, Why is there is nothing about the nasty Campaign flyers Friends for Duckworth have sent out on this or Roskam Article, again ..Why? See ] and try to add that factual information, it will be removed off this article very quickly as Popol lovingly protects this article from any negative contributions. Don't take my word or even believe me, look and see the entry logs and histories for your self. ] 11:12, 15 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
__TOC__ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::It is completely filled with glowing campaign flyer copy about her and bashing and negativity about Roskam. It should be noted that ] is a single purpose account, mostly editing on the Duckworth and Roskam Page. Propol protectes the Duckworth page, and dumps any thing negative and near slanderous entry on the Roskam article. It is painfully clear what is happening and should be noted that most of the information on both article is not encyclopedic and conforming to ] and ] Also, ] is very smart and aggressive to use wikirulez to get his way. See his histories and confirm, don't take my word for it. Beware, to question means geting bad from those that protect this article ] 11:12, 15 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
Referencing and citation: criterion met
