| Revision as of 13:39, 9 January 2017 editAffeL (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,562 edits →GA Review← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:41, 9 January 2017 edit undoMiyagawa (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers57,339 edits Replied | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| *That's the lot. ] (]) 13:25, 9 January 2017 (UTC) | *That's the lot. ] (]) 13:25, 9 January 2017 (UTC) | ||
| :: {{ping|Miyagawa}} All done. And I removed the image. - ] (]) 13:39, 9 January 2017 (UTC) | :: {{ping|Miyagawa}} All done. And I removed the image. - ] (]) 13:39, 9 January 2017 (UTC) | ||
| :::Thanks - happy to promote. You're right about the production bit, I'd missed that. ] (]) 13:41, 9 January 2017 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:41, 9 January 2017
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 01:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
- Grabbing for a review in the next couple of days. Miyagawa (talk) 01:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, time for that long delayed review. After promising to do it by the end of last weekend, I completely forgot yesterday!
- No overlink issues.
- There should be some sort of summary of the production section in the lead.
- There already is something from the production section.. with ("Filming of the episode's foot chase scene between Arya and the Waif required a month of practice in Belfast to get the choreography right") - AffeL (talk) 13:39, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- "Recurring guest actors Clive Russell as Blackfish, and Essie Davis as Lady Crane were also killed off the series." - I can't help but feel that there's a word missing from the second part of this sentence. Perhaps reword it to something like "portrayed their characters for the last time in the series, as they were killed off on screen."?
- Put The A.V. Club in the citation in italics. All other cites are good.
- The only significant issue I have is the infobox image. You'll need to lose it. I don't think there's a strong argument for retaining it (as currently it's for illustrative purposes only). The post production comparison image is fine as they demonstrates something that couldn't be explained properly by text alone. Whereas that infobox image could have been from any number of episodes, and nothing jumps out at me from the production section that suggests it could do with an image to help it.
- That's the lot. Miyagawa (talk) 13:25, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Miyagawa: All done. And I removed the image. - AffeL (talk) 13:39, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks - happy to promote. You're right about the production bit, I'd missed that. Miyagawa (talk) 13:41, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Miyagawa: All done. And I removed the image. - AffeL (talk) 13:39, 9 January 2017 (UTC)