| Revision as of 22:48, 16 September 2006 view sourceRadiant! (talk | contribs)36,918 edits if we're going to use this, a simple log would be nice | Latest revision as of 15:52, 4 November 2007 view source Carcharoth (talk | contribs)Administrators73,550 edits →Gene Nygaard is banned from non consensual article moves until further notice: update link | ||
| (18 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{historical}} | |||
| ==Concept== | ==Concept== | ||
| Sometimes, an otherwise good contributor loses his or her cool and judgment related to a single article or topic. In such a case, it may be best for the encyclopedia if said person ceases editing said topic for a while. |
Sometimes, an otherwise good contributor loses his or her cool and judgment related to a single article or topic. In such a case, it may be best for the encyclopedia if said person ceases editing said topic for a while. When imposed by the community of administrators, such remedies are known as '''community sanctions''', as opposed to a '''community ban''' where the community simply decides the encyclopedia is better off without the user entirely. Sanctions generally have a time limit, and violating a sanction generally results in a ] of some sort. | ||
| There is no strict formal process regarding community |
There is no strict formal process regarding community sanction. Community sanctions are proposed and discussed on the ], and logged here for convenience since said noticeboard has a rather large mailflow. A community sanction should probably not be imposed by just a single admin, and can be appealed to the admin noticeboard, or if necessary, to the ArbCom. This page is just a log, and is ''not'' meant for discussion of any sort. | ||
| ⚫ | ==Current sanctions== | ||
| ] | |||
| === Gene Nygaard is banned from non consensual article moves until further notice === | |||
| ⚫ | ==Current |
||
| {{user|Gene Nygaard}} is banned from any page moves unless there clearly is an existing consensus (as decided/evaluated at the whim of the blocking admin, subject to review) in place either on the corresponding talk page of the aticle, or clearly referenced in the edit summary with a clickable link, and specifically encouraged to carry out useful redirects and category alphabetisation. The ban is to be enforced by short blocks at admin discretion, blocks to increase in duration if behaviour does not change, with an ultimate permanent ban from the community as last resort. ++]: ]/] 19:05, 19 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Note: per discussion here: ] (will update with archive reference once it archives)... new thread on AN/I and posted to his talk. | |||
| :Since it seem that this wasn't updated, here is the link to the archived ANI dicsussion: ]. ] 15:52, 4 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Completed sanctions== | |||
| === Heqwm is on 30 day community probation relating to Boy Scouts of America related articles === | |||
| As per a , {{user|Heqwm}} is now under ] with regard to all ]-related articles. For the next month, he is forbidden to edit any of these pages as well as the associated talk pages. Should he violate this probation, he should be blocked from editing all together for an appropriate amount of time. Should his ] find a different remedy upon its conclusion, discusssion may take place on whether it should supercede this decision. --] 14:47, 27 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:52, 4 November 2007
 | This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
Concept
Sometimes, an otherwise good contributor loses his or her cool and judgment related to a single article or topic. In such a case, it may be best for the encyclopedia if said person ceases editing said topic for a while. When imposed by the community of administrators, such remedies are known as community sanctions, as opposed to a community ban where the community simply decides the encyclopedia is better off without the user entirely. Sanctions generally have a time limit, and violating a sanction generally results in a block of some sort.
There is no strict formal process regarding community sanction. Community sanctions are proposed and discussed on the admin noticeboard, and logged here for convenience since said noticeboard has a rather large mailflow. A community sanction should probably not be imposed by just a single admin, and can be appealed to the admin noticeboard, or if necessary, to the ArbCom. This page is just a log, and is not meant for discussion of any sort.
Current sanctions
Gene Nygaard is banned from non consensual article moves until further notice
Gene Nygaard (talk · contribs) is banned from any page moves unless there clearly is an existing consensus (as decided/evaluated at the whim of the blocking admin, subject to review) in place either on the corresponding talk page of the aticle, or clearly referenced in the edit summary with a clickable link, and specifically encouraged to carry out useful redirects and category alphabetisation. The ban is to be enforced by short blocks at admin discretion, blocks to increase in duration if behaviour does not change, with an ultimate permanent ban from the community as last resort. ++Lar: t/c 19:05, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Note: per discussion here: Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Is_this_disruption.3F (will update with archive reference once it archives)... new thread on AN/I and posted to his talk.
- Since it seem that this wasn't updated, here is the link to the archived ANI dicsussion: Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive141#Is this disruption?. Carcharoth 15:52, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Completed sanctions
Heqwm is on 30 day community probation relating to Boy Scouts of America related articles
As per a discussion on AN:I, Heqwm (talk · contribs) is now under Community probation with regard to all Boy Scouts of America-related articles. For the next month, he is forbidden to edit any of these pages as well as the associated talk pages. Should he violate this probation, he should be blocked from editing all together for an appropriate amount of time. Should his mediation case find a different remedy upon its conclusion, discusssion may take place on whether it should supercede this decision. --InShaneee 14:47, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Category: