| Revision as of 19:20, 17 September 2006 editMZMcBride (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users190,597 edits →Votes for closure: +vote← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:00, 9 March 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (18 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| <center>< |
<center><span style="font-size:x-large;">'''The current PCA is: ''(vacant)'''''</span></center> | ||
| '''Notice''': This case is listed on the "In the news" section on the front page. As of now, it has very little information on the opinions, so whatever work can be done to add that in the next few days would be very helpful. Discussion so far is on the article's talk page.--] ] 21:58, 29 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- The following code can be added, as necessary, to the talk page for the current PCA | |||
| {| class="messagebox standard-talk" | |||
| |- | |||
| |align="center"|''This article is the current ] for the ''']''', an attempt to create excellent and standardized articles about ]. If you would like to participate, you are welcome to edit the article, or visit the ], where you can join the project and/or contribute to the ].'' | |||
| |} | |||
| --> | |||
| Line 24: | Line 16: | ||
| *'']'' Footnote four started modern levels of judicial scrutiny | *'']'' Footnote four started modern levels of judicial scrutiny | ||
| *'']'' presidential power in wartime | *'']'' presidential power in wartime | ||
| *While I can't think of any off the top of my head, I'm proposing a case that, unlike the ones above, doesn't have very much substance to it at all, yet it has had a powerful effect on law. That way, everyone could get involved and work to build it from nothing. | |||
| **] is full of short articles (and a few that no longer deserve the stub designation). | |||
| *'']'', extremely short right now, yet an interesting case involving free speech | |||
| *'']'' - controversial case indirectly deciding ] | |||
| *'']'' - Case upholding the federal Partial Birth Abortion Ban of 2003. | |||
| *'']'' state laws banning interracial marriage uconstitutional | |||
| ===Voting=== | ===Voting=== | ||
| ⚫ | * |
||
| *#could use lots of background information and is very timely.--] ] 05:13, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *#Seconded. The opinions section could definitely be expanded, and I suspect there is a wealth of critical response that can be integrated as well. ] ] 05:35, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Wikipedians involved== | ==Wikipedians involved== | ||
| ⚫ | *] | ||
| *] (hopefully) | *] (hopefully) | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] (as schedule allows) | *] (as schedule allows) | ||
| *] | |||
| ⚫ | *] | ||
| ==Article sections== | ==Article sections== | ||
| Line 54: | Line 50: | ||
| This section is to be used once an article has reached the point of being completed and every section above is crossed off. All Wikipedians involved must register their vote to close a collaboration. When the every member involved agrees that the article is complete to both Project and featured article standards, the article will be submitted as a nomination for featured article. Until every member involved in the particular collaboration agrees that the article is complete, it will continue to be worked on. | This section is to be used once an article has reached the point of being completed and every section above is crossed off. All Wikipedians involved must register their vote to close a collaboration. When the every member involved agrees that the article is complete to both Project and featured article standards, the article will be submitted as a nomination for featured article. Until every member involved in the particular collaboration agrees that the article is complete, it will continue to be worked on. | ||
| *Hasn't gotten much work in the last few weeks after a ton of work by ]. Close?--] ] 23:38, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I basically made this a PCA by editorial fiat since it would get so much attention anyway. I think we could still do some work on it, but does anyone want to close it?--] ] 21:14, 12 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::After several months, I'm voting for this PCA to be closed and for a new PCA to be started. --] 19:20, 17 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Previous PCAs== | ==Previous PCAs== | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| ⚫ | * ] | ||
| * ] | |||
Latest revision as of 11:00, 9 March 2023
The United States Supreme Court Case Article Improvement Project Project Collaboration Article is an article chosen by members of the Project who wish to participate. The object of the collaboration is to improve the article to the level of a featured article on the Misplaced Pages Main Page.
Next PCA
Nominations
Voting for the next PCA may begin at any time. The following articles have been nominated:
- Marbury v. Madison - established judicial review
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld - government's ability to detain unlawful combatants
- Webster v. Reproductive Health Services abortion regulation
- United States v. Carolene Products Co. Footnote four started modern levels of judicial scrutiny
- Prize Cases presidential power in wartime
- While I can't think of any off the top of my head, I'm proposing a case that, unlike the ones above, doesn't have very much substance to it at all, yet it has had a powerful effect on law. That way, everyone could get involved and work to build it from nothing.
- Category:U.S._Supreme_Court_stubs is full of short articles (and a few that no longer deserve the stub designation).
- Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, extremely short right now, yet an interesting case involving free speech
- Bush v. Gore - controversial case indirectly deciding 2000 U.S. Presidential Election
- Gonzales v. Carhart - Case upholding the federal Partial Birth Abortion Ban of 2003.
- Loving v. Virginia state laws banning interracial marriage uconstitutional
Voting
Wikipedians involved
Article sections
The sections as outlined by the Project are listed below. As sections are completed by Wikipedians, they should be crossed off to show that they are done.
- Introduction
- Prior history
- The case
- Effects
- Subsequent history
- Sources and further reading
- External links
- Categories
- Interlanguage links (if possible)
For an explanation of the type of information that should be included in each section, please see Misplaced Pages:WikiProject US Supreme Court Cases#Guidelines and article outline.
Votes for closure
This section is to be used once an article has reached the point of being completed and every section above is crossed off. All Wikipedians involved must register their vote to close a collaboration. When the every member involved agrees that the article is complete to both Project and featured article standards, the article will be submitted as a nomination for featured article. Until every member involved in the particular collaboration agrees that the article is complete, it will continue to be worked on.
- Hasn't gotten much work in the last few weeks after a ton of work by Axios023. Close?--Chaser T 23:38, 5 December 2006 (UTC)