| Revision as of 11:43, 19 September 2006 editAis523 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,378 edits redirect← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:39, 13 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''Delete'''. —]→] • 00:10, 29 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|}} | |||
| This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages overturned by DRV . It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I '''abstain'''. ] 14:39, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages overturned by DRV . It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I '''abstain'''. ] 14:39, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment''' There have been many previous esoteric programming language-related AfDs, often with mass nominations. Not all of the following will be relevant, but many may be. | *'''Comment''' There have been many previous esoteric programming language-related AfDs, often with mass nominations. Not all of the following will be relevant, but many may be. | ||
| *'''Delete''', no demonstrated notability.--] 20:01, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''', no demonstrated notability.--] 20:01, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep'''. Notable for being one of relatively few computer languages dedicated to cellular automata, let alone CA languages that are as powerful as this. Indeed, the article doesn't do ALPACA justice - we should '''expand''' it to give a much wider view of ALPACA's features, and link to it from the ] page. I can imagine people coming to it looking for languages used to specify the things. -- ] 21:52, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. Notable for being one of relatively few computer languages dedicated to cellular automata, let alone CA languages that are as powerful as this. Indeed, the article doesn't do ALPACA justice - we should '''expand''' it to give a much wider view of ALPACA's features, and link to it from the ] page. I can imagine people coming to it looking for languages used to specify the things. -- ] 21:52, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ** Could you point out several secondary sources which refer to this language? —'']'' 19:54, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Line 26: | Line 33: | ||
| *Speedy keep, already merged. ] 06:37, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | *Speedy keep, already merged. ] 06:37, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Redirect''', already merged. --] 11:43, 19 September 2006 (]]]) | *'''Redirect''', already merged. --] 11:43, 19 September 2006 (]]]) | ||
| ** '''???''' Already merged with what? -- ] 21:41, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *** ] (see the penultimate item on the list above). --] 16:46, 22 September 2006 (]]]) | |||
| *'''Delete''' per my rationale at ]. —'']'' 19:54, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' for lack of notability as an esoteric language. ] <small>]</small> 00:15, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 02:39, 13 February 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. —Centrx→talk • 00:10, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
ALPACA programming language
This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 14:39, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment There have been many previous esoteric programming language-related AfDs, often with mass nominations. Not all of the following will be relevant, but many may be.
- Delete, no demonstrated notability.--Isotope23 20:01, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Notable for being one of relatively few computer languages dedicated to cellular automata, let alone CA languages that are as powerful as this. Indeed, the article doesn't do ALPACA justice - we should expand it to give a much wider view of ALPACA's features, and link to it from the cellular automaton page. I can imagine people coming to it looking for languages used to specify the things. -- Smjg 21:52, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Could you point out several secondary sources which refer to this language? —Ruud 19:54, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
|
Dates shown are the date on which the debate started.
Previous Esoteric programming language-related deletion debates:
|
- Delete Already merged, and a lack of apparent references prevents proper verification. As much as it's novel and interesting, it's nature means it's an end-tool rather than something future works build upon. LinaMishima 02:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, already merged. Kappa 06:37, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect, already merged. --ais523 11:43, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- ??? Already merged with what? -- Smjg 21:41, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- List of esoteric programming languages (see the penultimate item on the list above). --ais523 16:46, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- ??? Already merged with what? -- Smjg 21:41, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per my rationale at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Esoteric programming languages. —Ruud 19:54, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete for lack of notability as an esoteric language. Equendil Talk 00:15, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.