| Revision as of 23:00, 20 September 2006 editKappa (talk | contribs)36,858 edits →[]← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:31, 20 October 2024 edit undoPitille02 (talk | contribs)146 edits →Proposed deletion of Akpo | ||
| (530 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Not around|||June 2008}} | |||
| <big><center> | <big><center> | ||
| " I'm right, and he is wrong. There is nothing to discuss."<small><sup></sup></small> {{user3|Agüeybaná}} | |||
| Welcome to my talk page.</center></big> | |||
| </center></big> | |||
| This is the talk page of User:Kappa. Hi. | |||
| :''I will generally but not always reply here. If I talked to you, I will be watching your talk page so you can reply there if you wish. | |||
| Previous discussions: ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] | Previous discussions: ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] | ||
| ==Greeting== | |||
| thanks for the additional info on PUTO, highly appreciate that. ] 20:00, 10 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Deprodding== | |||
| While it's certainly not required, when deprodding an article it's generally considered polite to explain your objections to deletion on the article's talk page. This may also help to prevent unnecessary AfD requests by laying out the arguments against deletion before it's sent there. Thanks! ] 03:19, 4 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Well quite often the prod tag just says "nn-X" or whatever, and I simply disagree with that assessment as grounds for deletion. If some kind of evidence-based discussion is provided I am more likely to respond in kind - and often (well occasionally anyway LOL) I can be persuaded that deletion is necessary. ] 03:46, 4 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::As noted, it's considered good form to note your objection to the prod rather than just removing it, as you did at ]. And in the case of the Les Miz songs if you remove them with the notion that they should be merged somewhere, you have IMHO taken it upon yourself to do the merge work involved. ] 11:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Afghan companies list == | |||
| The reason why I suggested it be deleted is that it *is* confusing. The list on this page is only partial. People come to this page thinking they've found **the** list - but in fact they've missed about half the companies. Check out <nowiki>Category:Companies of Afghanistan</nowiki> to see what I mean. If we keep it who will maintain it? Categories are at least self maintaining. | |||
| ] 14:01, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Well OK I've just been through the category system to find all the Afghan companies I could, and it was a very unpleasant experience. I think it's worth keeping the list in order to spare at least some users the same amount of wasted time. ] 14:47, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : I just saw the warnings and links you put at the top. I think that is a great compromise. Thanks. And thanks for the example of how to link to a category. I wasn't sure how to do that. ] 20:16, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : Also what made it unpleasant? I'd like to think about ways to make the category system more usable -- ] 20:16, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | == ] == | ||
| Line 15: | Line 32: | ||
| I've noticed your name turning up on a couple of song AfDs recently, talking about deletion as a "betrayal of fans" and things like that. The songs are never nominated for deletion to "betray fans" or anything like that. It's always a case of whether or not a given song is in fact notable. I'll be the first to admit that there are some album tracks by some of my favourite artists which I'd ''love'' to see an article on here, but just because a song is a real fan favourite doesn't necessarily mean it's notable in a wider sense. ] - ] (]) 07:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC) | I've noticed your name turning up on a couple of song AfDs recently, talking about deletion as a "betrayal of fans" and things like that. The songs are never nominated for deletion to "betray fans" or anything like that. It's always a case of whether or not a given song is in fact notable. I'll be the first to admit that there are some album tracks by some of my favourite artists which I'd ''love'' to see an article on here, but just because a song is a real fan favourite doesn't necessarily mean it's notable in a wider sense. ] - ] (]) 07:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *Betrayal is the result if its deleted. Someone who listens to a song and wants to know what it's about or how it was inspired doesn't care if its "notable" or not. ] 15:58, 15 September 2006 (UTC) | *Betrayal is the result if its deleted. Someone who listens to a song and wants to know what it's about or how it was inspired doesn't care if its "notable" or not. ] 15:58, 15 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| **True enough, but why then are we honour bound to have an article on each and every song by each and every singer or band? At least 50% of the articles in the AfD this all referred to were just written along the lines of "X is a song by Y on album Z. It was written by Joe Bloggs". This doesn't tell me anything I can't gain from the liner notes of the average album. Sure, there's no limit to the number of articles we can have in this encyclopedia, but why do we have things like ] if every song in the world is allowed in so that fans can find out about it? My apologies for a delayed response, by the way, your Talk page had somehow fallen off my watchlist. ] - ] (]) 00:39, 25 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ***You aren't honour bound to have a seperate article for every recorded song by a notable band but as far as I am concerned you are honour bound to attempt to explain and discuss it ''somewhere''. If someone has written a description of the song and you delete it (rather than merging) just because you don't think it belongs on a separate page, you are betraying your audience who may not have access to the liner notes or the song itself. (Regarding your watchlist, I think there might be something wrong with my archiving technique.) ] 05:13, 25 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Yenta Claus == | == Yenta Claus == | ||
| I am trying to figure out what is wrong and was wondering if labeling the AfD as biographical by an editor was the right place for a holiday folk hero?--Cuddles 03:33, 16 September 2006 (UTC) | I am trying to figure out what is wrong and was wondering if labeling the AfD as biographical by an editor was the right place for a holiday folk hero?--Cuddles 03:33, 16 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *Well "what is wrong" seems to be that there isn't enough verifiable evidence out there to prove that it's an established, or even an emerging, cultural phenomenon. I know not everything is on google, but unfortunately wikipedia has to demand evidence (although it's inconsistent, I know). I know you worked hard to provide it and it's a pity if the article still gets deleted. My feeling is that this is a real but currently unverifiable thing, hopefully more evidence will appear with time. If you could find it in a couple more books, that would probably be enough, or it might get more net coverage during the holiday season. | *Well "what is wrong" seems to be that there isn't enough verifiable evidence out there to prove that it's an established, or even an emerging, cultural phenomenon. I know not everything is on google, but unfortunately wikipedia has to demand evidence (although it's inconsistent, I know). I know you worked hard to provide it and it's a pity if the article still gets deleted. My feeling is that this is a real but currently unverifiable thing, hopefully more evidence will appear with time. If you could find it in a couple more books, that would probably be enough, or it might get more net coverage during the holiday season. | ||
| *Thank you for your interest in Yenta Claus, but alas she must be a myth, an urban legend have you, and besides, she was simply too good to be true. Maybe? Thanks for the tip, but I believe Hanukkah Harry is about to get the Wiki Axe. Too sad. BTW, Is there really a Yenta Claus or not? Merry what ever you celebrate and just a friendly hello. Have a bright life, Yenta Claus :-) <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) {{{2|}}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
| *There are other places that will accept your article, perhaps ] or other ]. I'm sorry you have had such an unpleasant experience here. Also it's clearly not a biography so I've recategorized it to "society" where it fits a little better. ] 04:14, 16 September 2006 (UTC) | *There are other places that will accept your article, perhaps ] or other ]. I'm sorry you have had such an unpleasant experience here. Also it's clearly not a biography so I've recategorized it to "society" where it fits a little better. ] 04:14, 16 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Line 32: | Line 52: | ||
| *If you are talking about ]... ] 15:16, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | *If you are talking about ]... ] 15:16, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *Partly that one; partly a couple of others I noticed on some page histories, and partly some stuff in AFDs a while back... I'm not criticising you or saying your deprodding/voting is necessarily wrong, but it might be helpful to explain your reasoning in certain situations. ] 19:52, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | *Partly that one; partly a couple of others I noticed on some page histories, and partly some stuff in AFDs a while back... I'm not criticising you or saying your deprodding/voting is necessarily wrong, but it might be helpful to explain your reasoning in certain situations. ] 19:52, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *Agreed, what was your reason for deproding ], and for removing the linkless template, as the article is linked to by only one non-user space article? Do you have any evidence that the album is notable? ] 01:03, 27 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| **It's an album by ] who seems notable so I deprodded it. One link seems sufficient for an album, but put the template back if you like. ] 01:09, 27 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | == ] == | ||
| Line 39: | Line 61: | ||
| :: 1) What's the difference between an editor and user? 2) Tags aren't "permanently" on articles, but are left to address concerns. I guess it is possible that a tag can be left "permanently" if that concern is not addressed, but I am not aware of a situation. I believe you should reinsert the tag or provide proof that it meets notability standards. ] 22:52, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | :: 1) What's the difference between an editor and user? 2) Tags aren't "permanently" on articles, but are left to address concerns. I guess it is possible that a tag can be left "permanently" if that concern is not addressed, but I am not aware of a situation. I believe you should reinsert the tag or provide proof that it meets notability standards. ] 22:52, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :::"User" = "reader". A notability tag is there to warn editors that the article is likely to fail an AFD - well it survived the AFD so the tag is now |
:::"User" = "reader". A notability tag is there to warn editors that the article is likely to fail an AFD - well it survived the AFD so the tag is now redundant. Frankly I'm not very interested in defending this thing, but it took all of 30 seconds to find more nontrivial independent third-party coverage. ] 23:00, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::: It survived due to a lack of consensus, which means it may very well be up for a AfD again for lack of notability. How does that link meet ]? ] 23:07, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::See WP:CORP #1. ] 01:31, 21 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::: You are asserting two religious websites are meet CORP #1? CORP #1: "The product or service has been the '''subject of multiple non-trivial published''' works whose source is '''independent''' of the company itself." So is church news is considered "non-trival" and independent of the school? Can you find any mainstream news article on it? Or any famous faculty? That would meet notability standards. ] 05:40, 21 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: Also you do know the sources you cited noted this unaccredited school does not have classes, but it does distance learning on the internet and at various churches? ] 06:08, 21 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::That fact merits mention in the lead, so I've promoted it. As far as I'm concerned it passes WP:CORP but I'm not very interested in defending it so I'm not going bother looking for other notability. Regarding WP:CORP, a requirement for ''mainstream'' coverage is too restrictive for an all-purpose encylopedia. The coverage seems clearly nontrivial (trivial: "school holds car boot sale") and I don't believe the institution is in a position to control the church-related press - if it does that shows a different kind of importance. Since this is a tertiary institution, I think the question we should try to answer is "do they have legitimate tertiary-level staff?". ] 02:03, 22 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Bratz characters == | |||
| I notice that you removed a PROD tag I'd added to various Bratz characters with the summary ]. However, I don't think it's appropriate that the level of detailed information on the subpages should be added to the ] page. This was discussed with ], who created most of these pages, in the context of the ]. | |||
| Please respond as to how we should now proceed, as I'm anxious not to waste community effort on so many pages by taking them all to AfD unless it's essential to develop a consensus. Thanks. ] 21:46, 21 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :If Alcy doesn't mind there's no problem redirecting to the list. ] 01:04, 22 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::OK, I've proposed this on the various talk pages. ] 02:27, 22 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Concerning ] == | |||
| Thanks for your effort; and I must really learn to use the CSD-numbers (A7). The article in the deleted version didn't, at least imho, assert the notability of the subject. But I would have undeleted it anyway. Cheers. ] 14:18, 22 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Kansas City (disambiguation) == | |||
| Hello. Can you explain why you reverted the ] page? Nothing links there. There is already a disambig page at ]. If people search they get the real disambig page, so what purpose does it serve? --] 14:39, 22 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :If someone links to or searches for that title, they will be taken to where they want to go, instead of being invited to create a new article there. ] 16:52, 22 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == A little bit late == | |||
| Erm... roughly half a year ago, thanks for the close shave on the ] AfD. ] 23:11, 24 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Votestacking == | |||
| Regarding You have been on wiki long enough to know that votestacking and ] are unacceptable. Please stop. ] 21:06, 25 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *You are trying to remove our voice from wikipedia, thanks for reminding me that I'm not trying hard enough to prevent this. ] 01:49, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] Your contributions history shows that you have been '''aggressively cross-posting''' in order to influence http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2006_September_22#Finger_Lakes_Christian_School. Although the Arbitration Committee has ruled that "he occasional light use of cross-posting to talk pages is part of Misplaced Pages's common practice"<sup>]</sup>, such cross-posting should adhere to specific ] found in ]. In the past, aggressively worded cross-posting has contributed towards an Arbitration Committee ruling of disruptive behavior that resulted in blocking<sup>]</sup>. It is best not to ], and instead respect Misplaced Pages's principle of ]-building, by ceasing to further crosspost, and instead allowing the process to reflect the opinions of editors that were already actively involved in the matter at hand. Thank you.<!-- Template:Canvass --> ]<small>]</small> 02:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *This issue is relevant to every inclusionist wikipedian, because if deletionist admins can ignore us at will it effectively means the end of the inclusionist voice in wikipedian affairs. ] 02:38, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| **It is relevant to all sides of the debate. Perhaps you could inform those members of ] as well to ensure a fair debate ]<small>]</small> 02:43, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ***I think it would be rather divisive to go and invite wikipedians to endorse the stance that the views of those who disagree with them are "absurd" and should be dismissed. Your mileage may vary. ] 02:45, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Kappa, please stop. If you continue, I am going to ask another admin to block you. ] 02:46, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Please stop indeed. I find that mass posting to be disruptive. Please find some other venue of dealing with this issue. ] (]) 02:55, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::What do you suggest? ] 02:56, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ****Two things. Vote Stacking gains nothing. An appeal for help is one thing, if you know that the editor in question has a history of supporting the topic in question. secondly, I am willing to take a look at it. Could you give me a link of an old version that I can take a look at to determine its notability. ] ] <small>]</small> <small> ]</small> 03:06, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: I don't quite know what to suggest, but mass-posting is not the way to go, no matter how strongly you feel about the issue. Thanks. ] (]) 03:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I have listed this issue at --] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 04:02, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::People have the right to be informed ''before'' they get stabbed in the back, not after. ] 04:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::: Following policy is not stabbing people in the back. Also see my comment below. ] 04:53, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::Not informing people that "policy" is suddenly disenfranchising them is stabbing them in the back. ] 05:50, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::I believe that you were warned at 2106-UTC on the 25th and that at 0149-UTC on the 26th, you stated that you were going to knowingly violate policy, since your message above was immediately before you began your second wave. --] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 10:22, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::Informing editors about their potential loss of voice in wikipedia discussions is not a violation of any reasonable interpretation of policy. ] 01:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::My misunderstanding; since your comment immediately followed mine, I assumed that you were saying that my listing of the issue at AN/I was a stab in your back. My response to you was therefore my explaination of why I felt my actions were not as so characterized. Obviously, I did not understand you correctly and your clarification renders my response of 10:22-26-Sep-2006 moot. --] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 02:20, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Votestacking == | |||
| Behavior like this is unacceptable, and boderline gaming the system. Stop it or you will be blocked for disruption. ] 03:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Your spam also contained an error, because you forgot a colon in the Category link, putting all these users' talk pages in the category. Also, about half of these users are totally inactive. These are the least of the problems with your spamming. —]→] • 04:05, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::I am not spamming or votestacking, I am informing editors of an issue which affects all of us. ] 04:48, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Kappa, have you read ]? This is a textbook example. ] 04:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Kappa you posted an "Appeal for you to help" On my userpage discussion. I agree with joshuaZ, that was a direct violation of ]. Though I do consider myself an Inclusionist, an article must first have "Good content" to be considered for inclusion. | |||
| ::::Also do me a favor and read: ], It might help you understand what's going on here.] 13:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Your User Contributions show that you've made a bizarre number of requests that inclusionists visit a debate. It is spam. It is votestacking. Ironically, your plea for one inclusionist to join the debate brought the issue to my attention when I was visiting his user page. Why ironic? Because my contribution to the deletion review was to say that it needed to stay deleted. Spamming like that may just alienate some inclusionists and lure some deletionists. ] 06:03, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Desperate situations require desperate measures. ] 02:05, 4 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Kappa, are you still unwilling to acknowledge that votestacking is wrong and disruptive? ] 02:48, 4 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Schools AfD et ali. == | |||
| Now, now, I understand your worry in a possible full-out war on high school deletions, etc. I am one person who have lived to see through all these carnage and how the debate has eventually evolved. And back then, someone actually ] in the process. Please, I don't wish to see you becoming the next casualty, don't mass post messages on fellow editors anymore. | |||
| The main arguement that can only currently override the whole agreement on retaining school-related articles is simply ], and fulfilling that through providing reliable sources will almost always solve the problem. Even if there are editors out there who wants to escalate these, please, don't add onto it. | |||
| - ''Best regards'', ]''']'''] 10:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :If admins get to impose their own personal standard of notability and ignore all dissenting opinions, no amount of verifiability will make any difference. ] 01:21, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :: If users get to impose their way by spamming a particular section of voters to get their own way then lack of notablity won't make any difference either. ] 02:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::You don't seem to have been following the discussion. ] 02:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Going back to Mailer diablo's comments, I don't see much evolution in the debate, we still waiting patiently for deletionists to accept some kind of compromise based on merging. ] 02:45, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :: Propose a policy for it that isn't wrapped up in ridiculously inclusionist keep policies like ] is and the "deletionists" might consider it. ] 02:50, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::Would you agree with Mailer diablo that "main arguement that can only currently override the whole agreement on retaining school-related articles is simply ], and fulfilling that through providing reliable sources will almost always solve the problem." ] 03:30, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Somewhat. In practice this seems to not even be true as the recent "compromise" with the DRV indicates (where it wasn't even clear to me that the school met ]). Among other issues with the statement I don't think there is some "whole agreement" about these, merely a well-organized push by a group for keeping the articles. However, this doesn't alter that I would (and I suspect many others) would be willing to consider a general merger proposal if it weren't tied into generous keep conclusions but was made as a separate item. ] 05:10, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::* To be honest, I haven't heard of the terms "deletionist-inclusionist" for a long time since the era of Votes for Deletion. Traditionally as a trend high-school articles are usually kept, and it is also up to the quality of the school article itself. Notability is now less used as an arugement for deletion, now mainly superceded by verifiability. Just so that you know and get updated of the deletion culture at the moment. Don't get worked up, don't worry, I do not see we are ever going to undergo a repeat procedure of the Userbox Wars where thousands of school articles are put into the fire-range. - ]''']'''] 09:33, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Per your vote== | |||
| Per your AfD vote I would like to point out that the wanted poster is not of the subject of the article and is of an unrelated person. The issue has been brought to AN/I regarding Geo Swan's reinsertion of the image and FBI information after already admitting they are unrelated. --] 04:08, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *Hmmm. ] 04:47, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| **There is discussion on the talk page regarding it, and you can see the names are quite different. Geo Swan states he discovered the link himself by assessing that arab names are hard to illiterate and the FBI must have been mistaken. Feel free to use my talk page if you need further info, I dont want you to feel like im pushing you, just wanted to bring that to your attention. I have tried removing it, he just keeps reverting. --] 04:57, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ***Thanks for bringing it to my attention. It's not clear to me if it belongs in the article or not but I won't base my AFD opinion on it. ] 04:59, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ****NuclearUmpf is mischaracterizing me here, and on the administrator's noteboard. I didn't say what he says I said. -- ] 18:12, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ***** '''"I don't think you understand. It doesn't matter whether they are the same person. I didn't assert they are the same person"''' --] 18:41, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Certain people seem to be under the impression at that AfD that ] is not an attempted compromise but rather an attempt to include pretty much all schools. Since you seem to think it is a compromise, you may want to discuss this with them. ] 20:11, 28 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == reply to your comment == | |||
| Hey, you left a comment on my discussion page but reverted it for some reason. Anyways, I'd be glad to help, and inclusionism most certainly is NOT absurd. I'll get right on it :). | |||
| ] 22:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :oh, seems it's been fixed! great. sorry i couldn't get there in time, i should log in more often. ] 22:07, 28 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == your comment == | |||
| Hi Kappa | |||
| Centrex reverted your comments on my talk page (as if I wanted that?) so I wasn't aware of the situation until it was evidently too late. Thanks for keeping me posted. I '''am''' interested in this type of thing, despite what the censors may think. | |||
| Thanks ] 22:03, 29 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked == | |||
| ] Your contributions history shows that you have been '''aggressively cross-posting''' in order to influence school deletion debates. Although the Arbitration Committee has ruled that "he occasional light use of cross-posting to talk pages is part of Misplaced Pages's common practice"<sup>]</sup>, such cross-posting should adhere to specific ] found in ]. In the past, aggressively worded cross-posting has contributed towards an Arbitration Committee ruling of disruptive behavior that resulted in blocking<sup>]</sup>. It is best not to ], and instead respect Misplaced Pages's principle of ]-building, by ceasing to further crosspost, and instead allowing the process to reflect the opinions of editors that were already actively involved in the matter at hand. Thank you.<!-- Template:Canvass --> I have also blocked you for '''48 hours''', as this was not your first offense and previous warnings do not seem to have had an effect. --] 14:40, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : I'll be discussing this with a view to having it lifted. It was a really silly thing for you to do, but it was days ago. Blocks are preventative, not punative, and it's not anyone's place here to "teach you a lesson." - ]<span class="plainlinks"> </span> 14:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I'll unblock him so long as he doesn't resume the spam, which seems to have stopped days ago, anyway. ] 15:24, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Bad faith afd nomination== | |||
| Hi. ] has been - for the sixth time. The nomination has been made in bad faith by a suspected sockpuppet. You voted to retain this article in February. Thought you might be interested to know. If not, sorry to trouble you. --] 09:05, 7 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Please reinstate the Sloppy Jo's Lunchroom. | |||
| That entry was accurrate, informational, and verifiable. | |||
| It's contents remained consistent with other similar entries ..ie Potbelly Sandwich Works. | |||
| Thanks so much and kindest regards, | |||
| Debi | |||
| *Hi Debi. Unfortunately I am not in a position to reinstate the Sloppy Joe's Lunchroom, and I wouldn't really be able to persuade anyone else to. The version I saw was, I imagine, accurate, but it was not ] by wikipedia standards, because it had no references and I couldn't find anything on Google. The difference with Potbelly Sandwich Works is both one of size and of the fact that it's easy to find evidence that it not only exists, but that people care enough to talk about it in ]. I recommend that you create an entry for it at ], ] or someplace like that... it if does accumulate some verifiable external coverage you may be able to try again later. ] 01:43, 25 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Eh? Why? - <b>]</b><small> ]/]</small> 00:20, 27 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *They can be looked at as one thing. See also ]. ] 00:22, 27 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Thanks for your interest in ]. I consider that schools are generally notable, but this article seems to be a hoax. I don't think there is a place called Puxatony in ], and the name doesn't sound right for an Inuit place name. Puxatony does not appear in ] or in ]. Please take a look at ]. --] (] | ] 03:17, 27 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *Please take a look at ]. ] 03:49, 27 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == "deprod"? == | |||
| You forgot to add your rationale for the {{tl|prod}} from "]". Without doing so, some could take it as being a baseless decision — rather a capricious action than one with merit and reasoning. The tag itself also recommends that you do the same: "To avoid confusion, it helps to explain why you object to the deletion, either in the edit summary or on the talk page." Since you didn't annotate either place, I worried you might not have realized that that inaction could be mis-interpreted. Thanks for working on Misplaced Pages, we appreciate everybody's contributions! — ''']''' <sup>|''' ]'''</sup> | 18:07, 1 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :If my edit summary is just "deprod" it can generally be taken to mean "I don't agree that this article should be deleted". Sometimes it means "I think this article should be deleted as it stands, but I'd like to give others the chance to save it", or "I think it should be deleted, but others might disagree, so they should get a chance to voice their opinion". ] 18:18, 1 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Haverford AfD == | |||
| I know exactly what you mean. Thank you, and I apologize in turn if I became too touchy. Deletions, especially on this particular topic, tend to get somewhat heated, and it's important to remember that the people arguing against you are still trying to improve Misplaced Pages. On the plus side, it does look as if the article's improving a bit, even if it's all just demographic data so far. ] 04:59, 4 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| By the way, I found that the middle school shared a campus with the high school from the 1930s to the 1950s; the high school moved into a new campus in the 1950s, leaving the middle school with the old campus. ] 05:04, 4 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Betrayal on books == | |||
| ] | |||
| Deletions are proposing a guideline which will almost delete any book unless its been covered in "works serving a general audience". Attempts to tone this down have been reverted . I don't think it's fair to betray wikipedia users who want to read about specialist-interest books like this, but your mileage may vary. ] 18:55, 7 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Deprodding articles== | |||
| You are continuing to deprod articles without providing reason, and place undocumentde redirects. | |||
| Why do you reverting my changes without explanation? '''Stop removing prods now.''' --] 01:29, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *ROFL "'''Stop removing prods now.'''". OK, I'll wait 5 days then take them off. ] 01:30, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Stop removing prod tags. People write ""NN" or something like that in their prod statement. Just because you think that's not sufficient, don't remove the tag. Either, fix up the article yourself and remove the tag, or just leave it alone. Almost all prods are deleted within 5 days, and when we do delete them, we systematically review over the article, and judge if it should be kept on Misplaced Pages. ''']]''' 01:35, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::If a prod tag says "Not notable per WP:BIO" and I think "Notable per WP:BIO" I'm going to take it off. ] 01:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Guys, just send all articles to AfD. That's what's ''supposed'' to happen when something's deprodded. ] 01:41, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Yes, if you feel have to clog AFD with notable Pakistani actresses and harmless redirects go right ahead. ] 01:43, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't like your argumentive tone, and I'm going through your contribs and taking it to AfD. ] 01:51, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| There is nothing in ] that requires a reason to be given. ] <small>(])</small> 01:47, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::: I'm not often on Kappa's side on this sort of thing, but if Kappa thinks that it passes an actual guideline then he has every right to remove the prod and should do so. If you disagree, take it to AfD. (And I for one am not worried about "clogging" AfD since they often bring articles to peoples attention and result in improvement that would otherwise not occur). If Kappa were systematically deprodding articles because he liked the topic and it clearly didn't meet the relevant guideline that would be possibly a different case. In any event, vandalism templates were not necessary and unhelpful. ] 01:48, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::I do think ] is not notable. Judging from the lack of links from other articles and the number of G-hits (although not always accurate), I don't believe they are notable. And I can't find any external links that can verify any possible future additions tot he page. The appropriate thing to do here is to send to AfD then. ''']]''' 01:54, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::I agree that no reason is '''required''' to be given per ], however, it is certainly advised that in most cases a rationale should be given. Removing prods for any reason is allowed, but removing prods for ''no'' reason seems pretty close to ]. ] 01:59, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| It's perfectly within the "rules" of Prod to remove the deletion tag without any explanation or edits or anything. It's considered polite and helpful, when de-prodding, to give at least some brief explanation in the edit summary, even if it seems that it should be obvious. Edit summaries make page histories and watchlists more useful, and there's no real reason not to use them. Still, if Kappa sometimes neglects to provide a reason for de-Prodding, I don't see that as a reason to throw rules and warnings at him, more of a reason to ask politely for increased communication. | |||
| Kappa, do you think you could make a point of leaving a brief explanation in the edit summary when you remove a Prod tag, to help other editors keep track of what's going on? I get the impression that several people would appreciate it. -]<sup>(])</sup> 02:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I agree in principle, GTBacchus, but the problem here is that this particular user is removing prods pretty much anywhere they're placed, without an explanation. To draw a converse analogy: If I hit the random article button one hundred times, and place a prod on each article without even looking at its content and without any reason, I would quickly and correctly be found to be acting in bad faith and wasting the time of other editors, even though in principle anyone is allowed to place a prod tag for any reason. ] addresses exactly this type of situation-if you disagree with a policy you should ''debate'' it, in the appropriate place, not ''sabotage'' it to get your point across. ] 02:14, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::If you want an explanation of any particular deprod, you can get one. For the general case I have made ]. ] 02:17, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::Why not put a link to that in the edit summary, if you have nothing more detailed to say? It seems it would be easy, and it might help. | |||
| :::In reply to Seraphimblade, it's not clear to me that Kappa is trying to sabotage anything, but I can see how frustrating it would be for someone who has added a bunch of Prods in good faith to see them removed without explanation. Kappa, I'm curious, do you find that a majority, or very large portion, of the prods you remove are for some particular common reason? In other words, is there a particular way in which you see Prod being misapplied more than others? -]<sup>(])</sup> 02:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I didn't say he meant to. I said he is. ] 02:46, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::*The most common misapplication is for articles that can be merged, or simply redirected. However I try to say "mergeable" or something in these cases. ] 02:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] is way out of line here. I'll quote from my own user talk page to explain my position: ''"...anyone can remove the prod immediately and at any time, with or without a reason. Merely removing the prod isn't necessarily a statement of disagreement with the person who placed the prod, but it is a statement that at minimum, further discussion is desired, although it could also mean more. A prod is a ], an immediate threat of speedy deletion that is removed when a deletion is debatable. It's intended to be easy to remove. Please don't take it so personally when people remove your prods, don't put them back, and don't tell people they can't remove them unless they meet your arbitrary standards first."'' Posting vandalism warnings in response is absolutely wrong. ]] 02:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::I agree that warnings (especially a final one) may have been counterproductive-removing prods isn't a blockable offense by any policy, nor is failing to comment on them (and I disagree that a single subpage constitutes a meaningful comment). I would, however, like to see specific objections to the deletion of specific articles. If nothing else, the person who placed the prod may have overlooked something in favor of the article remaining. In that case, a specific explanation would prevent an unneeded AfD request, while removal without explanation is likely to immediately send the article to AfD. | |||
| ::However, keep in mind that we do have an ArbCom for a reason-and much of that they deal with is those who are gaming the system per ], violating completely the spirit of a guideline or rule while keeping within a strict interpretation of its letter. Kappa, I believe that you are following the ''letter'' of the PROD rules, but by failing to examine each PROD proposal on its individual merits (or at least in failing to provide your rationale in anything other then a single "form letter"), I believe you're violating the ''spirit'' of them-that prods should be removed by those with a specific, genuine objection, not with an ax to grind against deletion in general, much the same as in the reverse situation I provided above-prodding a bunch of articles and figuring "the ones that should really stay will get sorted anyway." You're rather doing the reverse of that-removing prods left and right so that "AfD can sort it." ] 02:46, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :(edit conflict)I'm petty sure ArmadilloFromHell made an honest misake, and it would be frustrating to see 100 prods removed for seemingly no reason. The excerpt you quoted, Unfocused, is correct and well-stated; focused, even. -]<sup>(])</sup> 02:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::For your information, you are mistaken, none of the prods that were removed were put there by me, so there was nothing I could possibly take personally. --] 02:35, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::Kappa, how can you be sure that other users will think that the article should not be prodded? If you are thinking about what other Wikipedians will think, then you must also believe that there are others who will want to delete the article. You have to look at both sides here, not just one. ''']]''' 02:42, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Again, it does not matter. Perhaps we should have called it "uncontested deletion" instead of "proposed deletion." It is kind of like seeking unanimous consent for deletion. Kappa's actions amounted to the Misplaced Pages community noit granting unanimous consent, therefore the article should go to AfD to seek a wider consensus for deletion. Before prod, all of these articles went to AfD and it was tedious, to say the least. There were tons of uncontested AfDs, so hence, ]. The authors of prod wanted to make it crystal clear that it was only meant to act as a pressure release valve on AfD and be wide-open to objection. As I said, it can be frustrating, but the system works. ] <small>(])</small> 02:49, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == RfC == | |||
| You may wish to comment on the RfC about you: ]. Regards, ] 12:30, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Merge tags == | |||
| Related to the prodding issue, I have a question for you. I think we both agree that merging is in many cases preferable to deletion. I hope you would consider, when you edit an article to "deprod per ]", to add a {{tl|merge}} to the article. Of course this is not a requirement or anything, but it may be helpful to other editors, as well as spread the "idea" of merging (which, to my perpetual surprise, many editors seem not to have heard of). Yours, ] 08:50, 9 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *Yes I'll try to do more of that. Does seem to be a lost art. ] 08:58, 9 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Warning == | |||
| Calling admins "parasite" () has no possible good outcome. I recommend you review ]. <b>]</b> 00:16, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I was referring to deletionists in general, not this admin in particular. ] 03:24, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :: Oh that's charming, so instead of making a personal attack on a single editor you made it on a class of editors. Does that somehow make it more ok? ] 06:54, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Deletionists are people who take knowledge away from the world because they don't acknowledge that Misplaced Pages has any obligation to provide it. ] 19:42, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :: First, the knowledge is available elsewhere so the "deletionists" aren't taking anything away. Second of all, Misplaced Pages has no obligation to anyone or anything. This is a project to make an encyclopedia. Third of all, some information is more important or more relevant than others and `having unverifiable or unnotable topics leads to cluttering, more vandalism to deal with and a variety of other issues. Fourth, if you think Misplaced Pages should have all information why distinguish between Wikibooks, Wikinews, Wikisource, Misplaced Pages or any other Wikimedia projects? Furthermore, why ever remove any sourced information. We should then have entries on every sinlge human with their name and date of birth if we can verifiy it. ] 19:46, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :: And regardless of your feelings on the matter that is no reason to call other editors "parasites" (I am however, happy that you are at least not attempting to votestack the newest DRV). ] 19:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : The deletionists are taking it away from every human being on the planet who needs help getting it, to whom wikipedia is obliged to help provide "the sum total of human knowledge". ] 04:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :: Repeating yourself doesn't make the claim more true. Again, the information is still out there, just not on Misplaced Pages. Do you think we should have a biography of every human whom we can find any verifiable data point at? Because that's where your claim seems to lead and I think even you see that as absurd. My earlier responses to this comment still apply (a long with a note that in common parlance "sum total" when talking about an area of information doesn't necessarily mean every single detail). ] 04:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes repeating myself doesn't seem to be getting the point across, so this will be the last time. You are betraying every human being on the planet who needs help getting access to knowledge. ] 07:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Jenny Rom== | |||
| Hi, | |||
| The G11 choice on my part was heavily-influenced by the lack of sources, and the article's lack of clarity. ("Given that the article is presently unverified, confusedly-written, and a ''bit'' fan-ish, I can justify CSD G11 as the best option for Misplaced Pages," thought Xoloz to himself) Knowing your talent for cleaning-up anything, I'll gladly undelete if you'd like. Best wishes, ] 19:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Since you didn't reply directly, I've gone ahead and userfied her for you to clean at your convenience: ]. FWIW, I agree with Unfocused below. You do enormous good for Misplaced Pages, and no one should ever forget that. Best wishes, ] 19:03, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Good Work == | |||
| It seems to me that Misplaced Pages in general is getting less inspiring and more depressing, but you're doing good work. I don't understand how anyone could prod ] without doing the ten second Google search to verify that they truly are notable, and then nominate it for deletion without doing that same ten second search, but they did, and that's the environment here lately. I think that the expanded deletion powers may have made some editors just plain lazy. | |||
| However, please don't let people get under your skin. It seems possible that some you've sparred with are doing this intentionally to have an excuse to block you. Don't give authoritarians any excuse to do that. You're adding value here by helping prevent the removal of valuable content added by other good-faith contributors. If you have to, step away from the deletion arena for a while; we'll miss you greatly, but it'll still be there later. | |||
| I appreciate almost all that you do here, and thank you for doing it. ]] 15:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Civility == | |||
| Regarding , simply dismissing arguments as "bullshit" is both uncivil and counterproductive. Comments like that are why the current school AfD situation is so toxic. Please don't do that. ] 04:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I didn't simply dismiss it as bullshit, I explained why that's what it is. ] 02:24, 23 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::JoshuaZ, weren't you arguing to me recently that AfD ''wasn't'' toxic? I'm completely cool with it if you've changed your mind, it would indicate perhaps you're feeling empathy with the editors whose good faith efforts are being removed. ]] 09:13, 23 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Image:Mcdonalds fruitnwalnut salad.png == | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under ], but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our ] in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: | |||
| # Go to ] and edit it to add <code><nowiki>{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}</nowiki></code>, '''without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template'''. | |||
| # On ], write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. | |||
| Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, ], or by taking a picture of it yourself. | |||
| If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks"></span>. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you. ] <span style="font-size:75%">]</span> 09:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Another editor has added the "{{tl|prod}}" template to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the ] process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also ] and ]). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Misplaced Pages or discuss the relevant issues at ]. If you remove the {{tl|prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to ], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --] (] | ] 03:36, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I've added the "{{tl|prod}}" template to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the ] process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "]" and ]). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Misplaced Pages, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at ]. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to ], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the ]. ] 19:37, 13 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *Thanks for letting me know. ] 01:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| **Since I haven't seen any improvements or arguments about why this is notable, I have sent it to AFD. --] 02:56, 14 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ***Thanks again. ] 02:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ****Since I was wrong and Engro ''does'' meet WP:CORP (I should have done better research in advance), I have improved the article somewhat. I hope you like it! --] 17:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Hoshin kanri - we can delete the copyvio part == | |||
| On ], I didn't notice the copyvio - the copyvio passage can be (should be?) deleted. Is the copyvio against http://www.tqe.com/hoshin.html? --User:Ceyockey (<small>'']''</small>) 03:06, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *It's here , the bit starting "In 1965, Bridgestone Tire". I'll go take it out of the article. ] 03:11, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *:Can't get at it because I don't have a Google Books account - but that's trivia. I augmented the PROD reason a bit as well and will excise the copyvio from the transwiki entry. --User:Ceyockey (<small>'']''</small>) 03:28, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Deleting Categories of Jewish Athletes== | |||
| Hi. I know that this is an issue that has interested you in the past. At http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion#Category:Jewish_fencers some people are suggesting that Jewish athletes, beginning with Jewish Fencers, should be deleted. I do not think that is the correct approach, or consistent with wiki policy, and thought that others might want to weigh in on the discussion. --] 23:49, 7 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Changes to ]== | |||
| Hello there! | |||
| I made some changes tonight to the University of Guyana, mostly the adding of the notable alumni and notable faculty and administration. Clearly, the University has had many notable people go through it, it is amazing that the article has been abandoned by almost every editor. Feel free to tweak my edits and let me know what you think (particularly if you can find a good source for the alumni, I just added them by the "what links here" connection). Thanks and happy editing.--] 02:43, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned fair use image (Image:Lee jung hyun - nuh video screenshot.png)== | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see ]). | |||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you. This is an automated message from ] 21:31, 15 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==AfD nomination of ]== | |||
| An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been listed by me for ]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:adw -->] 10:04, 4 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I have added a "{{]}}" template to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the ] process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "]" and ]). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the <code><nowiki>{{dated prod}}</nowiki></code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. | |||
| I've been cleaning up categories for companies, and believe this list is now redundant. ] 21:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Wow. == | |||
| I just took a moment to read through your archives, and I'd like to commend you for outstanding work maintaining general civility and level arguments. It's an admirable quality in a person, to be so concrete in personal ideologies. ] ] 07:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == List of pubs == | |||
| As someone who has contributed to the talk page discussion on ] and/or that article's previous deletion debate, I thought you might be interested in participating in its new nomination for deletion which can be found ]. Thanks. - ] 17:22, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Attempt to delete subcategory of Jewish athletes== | |||
| Well, they are trying to delete a category of Jewish athletes again. This time, figure skaters. See http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_April_14#Category:Jewish_figure_skaters . I pointed out to the originator of the attempt that we had addressed this general issue already with the main category and with Jewish fencers, where the attempts failed (due in part to your help). Still, they insist on trying to delete this category. Any help by your weighing in on the issue would be appreciated. Thanks again. --] 00:25, 16 April 2007 (UTC)--] 20:12, 15 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Air Force Amy == | |||
| *The ] article has been nominated for deletion for a second time. I see in the past you voted to keep the article. Perhaps you might want to do the same again. -- ] | |||
| *Hardly, Kappa. ] 10:59, 29 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| **Yeah good work keeping wikipedia whore-free there Euse. ] 18:22, 29 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Image:Hustpierpoint College.jpg == | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under ], but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our ] in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: | |||
| # Go to ] and edit it to add <code><nowiki>{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}</nowiki></code>, '''without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template'''. | |||
| # On ], write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. | |||
| Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, ], or by taking a picture of it yourself. | |||
| If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks"></span>. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Replaceable --> -- ]<sup>]</sup> 10:27, 30 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I have added a "{{]}}" template to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the ] process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "]" and ]). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the <code><nowiki>{{dated prod}}</nowiki></code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ] 20:49, 5 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I noticed you removed the <nowiki>{{prod}}</nowiki> tab. Do you plan on improving the article? I don't see how it meets WP:N at all. If you don't plan on improving it, I'm unsure why you removed the tag. ] 20:18, 10 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I don't mean to be a constant bother.. but I still can't see anything that meets ]. I'm probably going to open an AfD discussion shortly if there still isn't, just figured I'd give you the heads up, don't want you to lose all your work if you can meet WP:N.] 18:58, 11 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::You might be able to kill off this one. Actually I don't enjoy making articles about random high schools but I can make if more necessary. ] 23:03, 11 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I don't mean to be insulting, and I guess I'm being bold, if not in the usual sense, but aren't you implying exactly the behaviour advised against in ]? ] 13:59, 16 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I don't believe improving wikipedia's coverage of high schools to be disruptive. ] 16:24, 16 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I think it's still clearly not the best way to make this point. There should be some sort of central discussion. If you think there should be a policy describing consensus that all high schools (or equivalent designations in other countries) are notable, draft one and propose it. At the moment, there does not seem to be any such policy (or, afaict, consensus). Don't get me wrong, I have a lot of respect for you and your views, even if I disagree with them; I just want to see this resolved in a less messy fashion. ] 18:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Propinquity == | |||
| I haven't spammed anything. I found that wiktionary had one definition of the word and wikipedia had another. Clearly this is not right. I don't know how to resolve it short of AFD which seems to me to be a machine gun to kill a grasshopper. I am not an admin or even a widely experienced user. Rather than accuse me of bad faith, could I suggest that you offer a constructive suggestion to resolve the problem. --] 12:07, 18 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :It looks to me like there is an encylopedic discussion in Misplaced Pages and a dictionary definition at Wiktionary. That is the way it should be. ] 23:10, 18 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Alternative would involve moving the discussion of ] back to a separate page and turning ] into a disambiguation, maybe even a redirect to ] which is already a disambig. ] 23:29, 18 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hello Kappa, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as ]. The image (]) was found at the following location: ]. This image or media will be removed per ]. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the ] or ] license or released to the ]. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. ]] 07:24, 19 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==No content in ]== | |||
| ]Hello, this is a message from ]. A tag has been placed on ], by {{#ifeq:1|1|],}} another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be ] from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because ] has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (]).<br><br>To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting ], please affix the template <code><nowiki>{{hangon}}</nowiki></code> to the page, and put a note on its talk page. '''This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate ] itself.''' Feel free to leave a message on ] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --] 19:28, 27 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==User:Kappa/Kaaos== | |||
| I have added a "{{]}}" template to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the ] process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "]" and ]). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the <code><nowiki>{{dated prod}}</nowiki></code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ] | ] 05:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ''Stay the hell off my user pages please. Thanks'' | |||
| Nope. Thanks. --] | ] 08:25, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :OK I have an asshole stalking me. Great. ] 08:26, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Not even wrong, but thanks for playing. Oh, by the way, ] makes for informative reading. Remember it when you comment on the ]. --] | ] 08:43, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::I voted to keep the material in your userspace. However, your comments above constitue a personal attack. Consider this a warning. <em>—] <sup><small>]</small></sup></em> 19:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your edits to ]== | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Eyes On Me|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a ] among editors. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] 14:17, 30 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Swearing and the rest of the b/s that happens. == | |||
| Hey dude, | |||
| I see you keep getting "done" for swearing. I actually don't see what the big fucking deal is but a lot of people on here are so bloody anally retentive. I got blocked once for saying "bitch". Ha! I do actually agree with you about what's happening with the ] thing but unless we can make it notable enough and pull it semi-away from Final Fantasy then it will have a chance to stand alone and have it's own article. Good luck, and really who gives a fuck about the swearing. The context of what you're saying is still getting through. ] 00:50, 1 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Image:Trophy.jpg== | |||
| Hmmm... I'm sure you have a good explanation as to why you uploaded ] but I'm not sure I'm interested. I've deleted it. ] 03:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I didn't upload it, I was trying to get it deleted so I tagged it with <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki>. I didn't realize it was actually the Commons page I had to get deleted. ] 11:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Spam in ]== | |||
| ]Hello, this is a message from ]. A tag has been placed on ], by {{#ifeq:1|1|] (] '''·''' ]),}} another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be ] from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because ] is blatant ] for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. <br><br>To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting ], please affix the template <nowiki>{{hangon}}</nowiki> to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at ]. '''Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate ] itself.''' Feel free to leave a message on the ] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --] 16:21, 25 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| How is this "blatant advertising"? | |||
| :Elan School is a private, residential behavior modification program and school (beginning with 9th grade and extending beyond high school completion) in Poland, Androscoggin County, Maine. | |||
| :It was founded in 1970 by psychiatrist Gerald Davidson and Joseph Ricci. In 2005 it had an enrollment of 172. The annual cost is $49,071.96. | |||
| :The school's treatment methods are based on the "TC" or therapeutic community modality popularized in the 1950s at facilities such as Synanon, and later at Daytop Village. | |||
| ::] 03:20, 26 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| The vast majority of the article read like a brochure. Hardly surprising given that it turns out it was a direct cut and paste from http://www.elanschool.com/about.htm & http://www.elanschool.com/admissions.htm. Is that what you created? I can restore the article for you, but only if you make sure that you don't let the article get in this state again. (I'm going to be away today but may have time to do it tonight). Please let me know. (please use my talk page) ] <sup>'']''</sup> 04:33, 26 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :That's what was in the Google cache. You admin priviliges don't right you the right to delete things just because you are too fucking lazy or imcompetent to check the history. ] 19:25, 26 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I don't think there is any call for swearing. I have already offered to undelete this. I don't think it is unreasonable to ask you to keep an eye on the article - surely its on your watchlist. Since I'm a very new admin I have asked on ] for advice on whether I handled this correctly. ] <sup>'']''</sup> 08:05, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| DO SOME REAL RESEARCH ON THE ELAN SCHOOL, THE INFO YOU HAVE IS A SHAM, THERE COULD BE A REAL INTERESTING DEFINITION AND STORY IF YOU JUST LOOK INTO THE FACTS <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 03:35, 28 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Personal attacks == | |||
| Hi there. You're an established enough editor, so I'm not going to insult you with a boilerplate warning. However, you're here long enough to know that comment is entirely unacceptable here. I know you're annoyed about the article being speedied, but there's no call for that - ] ] 08:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==AfD nomination of ]== | |||
| I've nominated ], an article you created, for ]. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that ] satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "]" and the ]). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ] 16:30, 28 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==AFC== | |||
| Hello. Please do not remove non-sense from AFC. Just deny them with a template. -]<sup>]</sup> 04:55, 4 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *LOL "just". I don't see why I should waste my time typing out templates around junk, so next time I'll just leave it there. In any case that was also a personal attack, and shouldn't have been left around for google to find. ] 05:01, 4 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| **Sorry for bursting in here, but I tend to agree with Kappa. It is perfectly fine to remove AFC submissions which are obviously not made in good faith such as personal attacks, patent nonsense, and basic vandalism. Since the submission was not made in good faith, there's no point in templating and keeping it for the submitter to find later, as the submitter very likely isn't interested in actually creating an article at all. <font style="font-variant: small-caps;">-- ]<sup>(])</sup></font> 21:12, 4 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Regarding ] == | |||
| Thank you for noticing the copyvio I missed. I do try to check against the references and googling select phrases on the AFC's I pass, but I let that one slip. I'll try to be more careful in the future. ] 09:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ethnic health or ethnicity and health == | |||
| thaks Kappa for that helpful edit. i did wonder about which title to use as I prefer ethnicity ... to ethnic. but wasn't sure. as a wiki virgin i'm a bit uncertain about key actions like setting up a references section, so had to dump references into the text which isn't cool: maybe I shall learn. | |||
| (I should have logged in then you'd know where my talk page was but I'e not found it myself yet) | |||
| ceehd. | |||
| == Dates of birth for fictional characters == | |||
| Fictional characters aren't born. The dob for McGonnagal in Harry Potter should be referenced in the text, not in-universe as you have done. ] 13:36, 6 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Heeeey Kappa == | |||
| Since you don't seem to have been by Wiktionary in a while, please ]. Cheers! ] ] 04:10, 12 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Hi Kappa, hope you remember me (you had helped me with the above article etc). My article ] has been translated to lot of other languages. In ] wiki (ml.wikipedia.org) one of the picture i had contributed is been selected as feautured one and pic of the day. I would like to know then, whether it is automatically becomes a Featured Picture in en.wiki?(http://ml.wikipedia.org/%E0%B4%9A%E0%B4%BF%E0%B4%A4%E0%B5%8D%E0%B4%B0%E0%B4%82:Mani_Madhava_Chakyar-Sringara1.jpg) | |||
| Again that picture was slightly modified in ml.wiki, now if i want to use that in my english article , how can i transport it from malayalam wiki to english? What is the procedure of using my GFDL image in other languages wikis? is it like i have to upload the photo again and write the details? Please help me..] 07:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Enjoyed reading your talk pages... == | |||
| ... I'm a bit of a serial deprodder too :) Every now and then I'll cruise through the prod category - pick all the 'foreign sounding' names, do a bit of research and then deprod about half for being ridiculous nominations in the first place. Frankly, if you create a new article on En WP called ] then chances are it will survive, try creating one called ] and it will be speedied within minutes :) | |||
| The first name I just made up and the second is a notable Khmer singer who was speedied not long ago - sigh. | |||
| Anyway, I came by to thank you for resurrecting the long dead ]. It's watchlisted, wikiprojected, assessed and surrounded with AP mines. Any bugger who tries to prod, speedy or AfD this core Wikiproject article is in for a fight - thanks and see you 'round AfD! Cheers, ] 17:40, 12 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *LOL you're welcome. I did strike me that wikipedia seems to need more articles on Cambodian companies, especially non-bank, non-airline companies... maybe this will stimulate development. ] 17:47, 12 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Given what I've read of your history (on WP) and views, I'd very much appreciate your input to the discussion and development of my ]. Thanks. ] 17:47, 14 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Sumo == | |||
| I just was reading through your pages. Hopefully you don't think any of us at ] are deletionist. I found this group of ] which I think fits what we are trying to do better. I don't think not having your own article is demoting by any means -- we just went through protecting the sumo glossary By putting all the yokozuna into context on one page I think makes a stronger context for everything. | |||
| Also, I noticed you put up a lot of pictures of all the yokozuna today. that's great! if you are interested that much in sumo, you should consider joining the sumo wikiproject. ] 06:35, 15 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Any normal person would think that someone who is only worth discussing as part of a list is less notable than someone who gets his own article. ] 15:07, 15 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Merger proposed: ValueRx → Express Scripts Incorporated == | |||
| It has been proposed to merge the content of ] into ]. Since you have previously edited one of these articles, I thought you might be interested. You're welcome to ] if you like. --] 13:16, 15 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == gunbai == | |||
| I see you have un-redirected gunbai's article and added some to it. Good show; if there is content to add to the articles they shouldn't be redirected. Some more information about gunbai would also be great. ] 22:56, 15 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == expanding articles == | |||
| I made the glossary as an answer to all the stubs; another answer is actually expanding the articles and giving them some depth. Keep up the good work and getting rid of those nasty redirects :) ] 01:02, 17 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Imraan Faruque== | |||
| Good catch on the uav author and designer--some ip address had added a bunch of useless and un-important information. I'll leave the notability tag up on it for now and keep it on my watchlist. Happy editing and keep up the good work. ] 16:09, 19 July 2007 (UTC)]] | |||
| ==]== | |||
| ]Hello, this is a message from ]. A tag has been placed on ], by {{#ifeq:{{{nom}}}|1|] (] '''·''' ]),}} another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be ] from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because ] fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: <br><div class="center">'''blatant advertising. Unbalanced and unsourced self-promotional propaganda'''</div><br>To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting ], please affix the template <nowiki>{{hangon}}</nowiki> to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at ]. Feel free to leave a message on the ] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself.''' --] 03:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==List_of_songs_about_masturbation is in it's 5th AfD== | |||
| ] is up for it's fifth AfD. You participated in an earlier one. If you wish to participate again, please go to | |||
| ] | |||
| -- ] 03:57, 20 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==AfD nomination of ]== | |||
| ], an article you created, has been nominated for ]. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that ] satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "]" and the ]). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ]] 13:26, 21 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==AfD nomination of ]== | |||
| ], an article you created, has been nominated for ]. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that ] satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "]" and the ]). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:AFDWarning --> -- ] 21:04, 24 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Alexis y Fido == | |||
| I didn't enjoy your ]. ] ], ]. You could end up ] ]. --''']'']'']''' 15:35, 29 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :BTW, I'm making it my top priority to hunt down these reggeaton articles and I'm going to nominate all that meet the ]. Be alert. How's ''that'' for ] ;-) --''']'']'']''' 16:10, 29 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::That would explain why you aren't bothering to look for sources properly. ] 16:25, 29 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::You aren't, either. --''']'']'']''' 16:27, 29 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::: *Sigh* I give up. If people want to keep useless reggeaton articles, then so be it. :-( --''']'']'']''' 18:24, 29 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I noticed you removed the prod without comment. The article is now listed at AfD instead. Please if possible specify reasons for removing the tag next time. Thanks! ]]] 09:23, 31 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Barnstar == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Original Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | To Kappa: I kept running into you at AfD in 2005. I'm glad to see you're as vigorously inclusionist as ever! Keep up your campaign and don't let those deletionsts get away with it. ] 12:29, 1 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == Shaw house and centre == | |||
| hi, I'm watching this article with a bit of interest as a member of both WikiProject Shopping Centre and the Notability Drive. | |||
| The reference you added to the annual report is quite a good find - however from terms of addressing ], it would be regarded as a trivial reference because the annual report which mentions Shaw House, is not ''about'' shaw house. | |||
| What the article really needs, are two ''secondary'' references, ''about Shaw House''. | |||
| Personally, I think the article is actually saying something which is a lot better than a lot of articles about similiar types of buildings, so it would be a shame for the article to be deleted. But so far I don't know that it has met any actual inclusion criteria. | |||
| ]]] 21:20, 1 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == AfD closure == | |||
| I don't need a reasoning; that would a bias on the judge, right? I only need to determine a result, which was to delete. Consensus was pretty clear in the discussion. ''']]''' 03:18, 3 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :What persuaded you that there was a clear consensus? ] 03:23, 3 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Recreation == | |||
| Hi Kappa. Please do not recreate an article right after it has been deleted through AfD. You are welcome to submit ] to ]. Cheers, ] 18:53, 3 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :So how long do you think I should have waited? ] 21:42, 3 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :{{{icon|] }}}Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Grand Hyatt Hong Kong|, such as ],}} to Misplaced Pages. Doing so is not in accordance with our ]. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-create2 --> --] ] 20:33, 3 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I've deleted the page again and put it up at DRV. You know full well that this is the correct procedure and I'm not sure why you would choose not to follow my advice. Cheers, ] 04:56, 4 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{{icon|] }}}Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to ] other editors{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Misplaced Pages:Deletion_review/Log/2007_August_4#Grand Hyatt Hong Kong|, as you did on ]}}. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-npa1 --> ] ] 05:34, 4 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==AfD nomination of ]== | |||
| ], an article you created, has been nominated for ]. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that ] satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "]" and the ]). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ] 01:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi Kappa. Please keep your temper in check . You've been here long enough to know that this isn't conducive to productive debate. Cheers, ] 19:54, 5 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Maybe I shouldn't have expressed my anger but I don't think lies are very conducive to productive debate either. ] 23:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Ho-Oh == | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Ho-Oh|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a ] among editors. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> If you want to discus it go to ]. -] 05:31, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :What's it got to do with them? ] 05:34, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'm confused. You mean other than the fact the Project has decided to merge most of the pokemon articles into lists after discussion on the project's talk page? -] 05:35, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Look even your 3rr message says to use the talk page. What authority does the Pokemon project have over Japanese mythology? ] 05:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Japanese mythology? Huh? Neither your warning or your argument is making a lot of sense to me. -] 05:39, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::OK either read the fucking talk page or read the fucking lead. ] 05:40, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I have looked at the article's talk page. It says nothing contesting the merge. -] 05:41, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::I am not contesting the merge, I am saying it needs to be a disambig. Try to follow the discussion. ] 05:43, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::A disambiguation for what? Ho-Oh and Japanese Mythology? -] 05:43, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::Actually it works better as a redirect to the right place. ] 05:50, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Kappa I agree with you for a disambigation only, I protected rather than to block both of you guys, even though you two does deserve a block for silly edit warning. And Kappa, see ]. Thanks ] ] 06:09, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Be Civil == | |||
| Let's try to discus this civil. Fuck is a great word to use in anger, but there are places not to use it; here is not a place to use it. -] 05:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Ho-Oh== | |||
| I've looked over this issue briefly, and I think that the two of you seem to be misunderstanding each other. | |||
| Kappa, this is an article about ], (which I gather is a game of sorts, but I'm not sure) and Ho-Oh is a '''named character''' in that game. This has absolutely ''nothing'' to do with Japanese mythology in the context it is used. You can not just decide to change the page into a disambiguation. And you cannot just redirect the page to what you feel like it should go to. The current ] page must redirect to the page: ] as per the discussion on the page ]. | |||
| And please do not use obscenities when talking to others, even on your talk page, that is a ], and not allowed on Misplaced Pages. Both of you should probably take a step back, breathe, and realize this is not an issue to get up in arms over. And Kappa, you need to stop redirecting the page to something unrelated to Pokemon, or you risk being blocked from editing. You both are violating the 3RR rule, so please stop. Thank you, <sup>]<font color="FF0000">♥</font>]</sup> 05:56, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :What should someone who types in Ho-oh looking for a discussion of a Japanese phoenix do? ] 05:59, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Well, my first suggestion would be to go to the Japanese Misplaced Pages, as I'm guessing that's the Japanese name for the phoenix? I fully understand your frustration, translating into English, and trying to find what you're looking for, but there are other ways to go about it, rather than engaging in revert wars, and using obscenities towards others in the community. (And I'd like you to realize that WarthogDemon was doing recent change patrol, not targeting you for some specific reason - his reversion was valid, the page was supposed to be merged along with the other hundreds of Pokemon character pages.) | |||
| ::If Ho-Oh is the absolute ONLY way to say phoenix in Japanese (which of course, I do not know), then I suggest you go to the Pokemon project talk page, and discuss the issue in a civilized manner, and ask for someone to create a disambiguation page for Ho-Oh. But you cannot simply redirect to another page without regard for the context it is ''most often'' used in. | |||
| ::I'm not going to be involved further in the issue, as I've given you about as much information as I can, and I'm not someone who knows about this Pokemon thing, so additional information will need to come from the project page. I hope you can understand, and you can realize that it is simply a misunderstanding between you two, and need not be an issue to attack someone on. Thank you, <sup>]<font color="FF0000">♥</font>]</sup> 06:10, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Um why don't you go read the article I redirected to? ] 06:14, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I did. It has nothing to do with Pokemon game characters. The page has been protected. If you have further issues, take it to the Pokemon project page, please. Thank you, <sup>]<font color="FF0000">♥</font>]</sup> 06:15, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == I Have Backed Out Of The Dispute == | |||
| But please, stop harrassing ]. I brought her into this to try and clear things up (which actually caused more confusion, admittedly, because I thought she was a part of ] when she wasn't). I did not bring her into this to be the subject of personal attacks. If anyone, these attacks should at the very least be directed at me. As it stands, Misplaced Pages doesn't allow personal attacks whatsoever, so please stop. -] 06:53, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I have since removed myself from this dispute. Please ask at ]. -] 23:55, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I have stepped out of the dispute. Enough. -] 05:49, 7 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Yes you "removed yourself" from trying to understand what was happening a long time ago and instead decided to rely on the 3RR. I just wanted that to be clear. ] 05:52, 7 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Final warn== | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}This is your '''only warning'''. <br> The next time you make a personal attack{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}| as you did at ]}}, you '''will''' be ] for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-npa4im --> - specifically one, which was completely uncalled-for. Please try to be more civil in future - ] ] 06:59, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *Sorry, I should have realized that user didn't know that they were doing and why. I'll know better in future. ] 22:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :* Point is that ''"what the fuck are you doing"'' is not an appropriate response in any case - ] ] 23:19, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::*What is an appropriate response to someone who has just joined a revert war by invitation without figuring out why it is happening? ] 23:22, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Notification of proposal: Guideline/policy governing lists== | |||
| Given your participation in recent AfDs involving lists (most notably ], I'd appreciate your input on the following: | |||
| ] | |||
| '''PLEASE NOTE''': Civility would be appreciated. Launching into profanity or personal attacks will NOT help your argument at all - to the contrary, it will more than likely hurt it. Just an FYI, given your track record. However, when you're civil, you generally have good insight, as you showed during ]. | |||
| Thank you in advance for any thoughts you may have on the topic. ] 16:23, 13 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Do not patronize me, civility is more than you deserve. ] 21:53, 13 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Notification of proposal to delete List of Latvians== | |||
| Please be advised I have removed your notice and responded as in the article's talk page as requested by the template notice.<span style="font-size:9pt; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"> — ]</span> 01:51, 14 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ANI == | |||
| Given your recent behavior, I have begun a discussion on ] seeing as you've been warned several times to stop. --]] 08:07, 14 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| =={{{header-text|]}}}== | |||
| A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under the ], because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page. Also please note that articles must be on ] subjects and should provide references to ] that ] their content. | |||
| Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that ] wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template '''<code>{{tl|hangon}}</code>''' to the page and state your intention on the article's ]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Redirnone-warn --> ] <sup>]</sup>|<sub>]</sub> 19:18, 14 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Linking to a category == | |||
| I fixed your comment in ], specifically your link to ]. In order to link to a category, place a colon in front of category, like so <nowiki>]</nowiki>. Without the colon, MediaWiki places a page in the category instead of linking to it. You can also use this to link to an image (<nowiki>]</nowiki> gives you ]) Thanks, --] 18:04, 15 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes I know how, I sometimes forget, sorry. ] 00:19, 16 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Prodding copyvios == | |||
| Please use ] if you discover a copyright infringement, and blank the page when doing so. You can list such pages at ] following the instructions on the template. Whereas ] gives explicit instructions not to remove the template, to ensure that it is reviewed and deleted, ] says that anyone is free to simply delete the template. —]→] • 03:12, 24 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == El Toro Handrail, revisited == | |||
| Hi, you commented on the last time ] was put up for deletion (]), and had some interesting things to say. I've put it up for deletion again (]), and I'd like you to review the article one more time. ] ] 06:55, 25 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == August 2007 == | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to ], did not appear to be constructive and has been ] or removed. Please use ] for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> ] 23:00, 30 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I would like to apologive for the warning, it was wrong of me and if i could take it back i would. All i saw was removal of text from an article without an explanation of why in the edit summary and assumed it was vandalism, that is my bad. I will be more careful next time. Thank you, See you around! ] 04:51, 31 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Hi..... == | |||
| ===Prod Patrol=== | |||
| I see that, like me and a bunch of others, you like to keep an eye on Prods. Check out ]. Also, a different solution to deletion is merging. Check out: ]. While there is some stuff that can't fit anywhere on Wiki, most stuff can be merged nicely into an existing article when under threat of deletion. With the use of the subsection redirect "#", a redirect can go straight to the merged section of an article. I find that is less controversial because both the people who want to delete an article and those who want to keep an article end up content (mostly!). <span style="border: 2px solid #F10; background-color:yellow;">''']''' *** ]</span> 09:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ===Category:Lists of alcoholic beverages=== | |||
| This category ] appears to duplicate ]. There is a subtle difference, however we need to be aware of ]. As I don't like deleting stuff I'm considering putting a {{]|Name}} tag in the category. Would you have any objections? Regards <span style="border: 2px solid #F10; background-color:yellow;">''']''' *** ]</span> 09:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *Yes, I object. The problem is that ] is an alcohol-related list, but not a list of beverages. I'll get back to sorting these lists, I got stalled because of my slow connection. ] 12:12, 1 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :OK. As we disagree I'll put it up for discussion to get a consensus one way or another. My preference is for a merge, so that is what I'll be suggesting. <span style="border: 2px solid #F10; background-color:yellow;">''']''' *** ]</span> 21:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ===Also - Integration=== | |||
| I've just become aware of a small, almost inactive project ], that you might be interested in, and which looks like it needs reviving. Good ideas, and good links on there. Regards <span style="border: 2px solid #F10; background-color:yellow;">''']''' *** ]</span> 09:44, 1 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==CfD nomination of ]== | |||
| I have nominated {{lc|Lists of alcoholic beverages}} for merging into {{lc|Alcohol-related lists}}. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ]. Thank you. <span style="border: 2px solid #F10; background-color:yellow;">''']''' *** ]</span> 21:27, 1 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Mammals of canada == | |||
| Thanks for giving ] a quick once-over. Some of the stuff you fixed in the lead was really embarrassing. ] 23:06, 3 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :No problem. Can you have a look at the row with "Nortwestern Deer Mouse" in? Not sure how to fix it myself. ] 23:08, 3 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Lists of fictional people== | |||
| Good work on categorizing all those lists! For future reference, though: The correct category tree for lists of fictional characters is ], not "Category:Lists of fictional people". --] 03:19, 4 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Sociolinguistics research in India == | |||
| Hi, I just wanted to let you know that the ] article has been substantially improved since you !voted in the ]. If you have time to take a look and comment again on the AfD that'd be great. Thanks! --] 06:21, 4 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==AfD nomination of ]== | |||
| An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been listed for ]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:adw --> --] 11:19, 4 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Foo-Americans and others == | |||
| I suspect the deletionists will not be satisfied until they have deleted every single Foo-American list, if not also categories. The criteria for deletion is so subject to manipulation by deletion experts who fully spend their time in WP honing their deletion skills, I don't see what successful opposition will be. Writers/contributors to articles are not experts in arguing for retention. ] 04:50, 7 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Song merging== | |||
| Hi. I don't mean to be a jerk about the merging thing ("Freedom") and upon closer inspection I see ] does not specifically outline that cover versions should be merged together. That said, there has been a long-standing effort by many editors to get multiple versions of songs put into the same articles (I can name quite a number of them here if you really want them, plus there is a user with a check-off list that people have been working from).... in addition a few of the "model" articles within WP:SONGS are set up this way (merged) and I think the general consensus is that song articles are about ''songs'', not ''singles''. Perhaps its time to reopen the discussion about cover versions in the WP:SONGS talk page. - ] 13:15, 7 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *Alright go ahead and merge it but at the moment it's broken, its two articles on one page. Also when you merge things you are supposed to mention where they came from in the edit summary see ]. ] 13:18, 7 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Hellbore AfD == | |||
| Hi - Suggest you check out your redirect Wikilink. It looks like you made a typo in ]. Thanks. — ] 10:54, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *I regard real flowers as more important than fictional weapons systems. Hellbore is a common (if maybe archaic?) spelling. ] 10:58, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *Sorry for thinking it was a typo. You have a point. I added a comment in support of a disambig page to address your concern. Thanks. — ] 21:54, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == 3RR == | |||
| Please note that you are in danger of violating ] at ]. An editor once said at ], "''don't say he was evil; just document his actions, and let the reader decide, based on his/her moral views, if he was a good man or a bad one''". This applies here. Don't say she is well-known, just document her work and that she has been voted unlikable, as you have already, and let the reader decide if she is "well-known", as many people (such as me) may have very different definitions for that word, therefore making it a POV and a violation of ]. --''']]]''' 22:49, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Are you telling me she doesn't fit your definition of "well-known"? ] 22:53, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::No, I'm telling you that, by adding that, you are violating ], a policy, ], a guideline, and ], another policy. --''']]]''' 22:54, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::So we agree she is well-known, but you think it's POV to say so, despite the evidence? ] 22:56, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I don't make the rules, I just enforce them, except when I ]. --''']]]''' 22:57, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Oh, and, BTW, you violated ]. I warned you, man. --''']]]''' 22:58, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Yes thanks for the warning. I know you are "]" that's why you are reverting without discussion. ] 23:00, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::I'm sorry it had to be like ]. --''']]]''' 23:11, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I think the problem with the 3RR is that it actually ''discourages'' "rule-enforcers" such as yourself from attempting anything challenging like talking. ] 23:38, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I ''did'' talk; you ignored me. --''']]]''' 23:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Show me a diff of me ignoring you. ] 23:42, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::See all the diffs at ]. --''']]]''' 23:43, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::Alright fuck it, I'm talking to a total moron. Go ahead and ban me. ] 23:45, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Civility == | |||
| Please in the future mind ] you use. Also ] is not recommended either. I see you have had warnings in the past, and as such, I will block you from editing for a few hours to prevent further disruption if happens again. Regards, ] <sup> ] </sup> 21:45, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :{{{icon|] }}}Please ] other editors{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, which you did here: ]}}. If you continue, you '''will''' be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-npa3 --><noinclude> | |||
| Per the same above! <b>]]</b> 21:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Unprotection of ]== | |||
| Hello. I'm going to request the unprotection of ], as you appear to be unwilling to discuss any changes. I can only do this if you accept the fact that you are wrong and that I am right and '''move on'''. If you are unwilling to do this, I'm afraid the article's going to stay protected. --<sub>Boricuaeddie is now</sub> ''']]]''' 01:43, 11 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi, please don't lie, you are the one who is refusing to discuss changes. ] 01:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ok, then. We'll have to keep the page protected. --<sub>Boricuaeddie is now</sub> ''']]]''' 01:47, 11 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::You do that. ] 01:51, 11 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Hissatsu attacks PROD== | |||
| Edit summary there really says it all. --] <small>]</small> 04:54, 11 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Your User Page == | |||
| Hi Kappa. Please don't disparage other users on your userpage, as you are currently doing with Boricruaeddie. Referring to him as having a "limited intellectual capacity" just because you have a difference of opinion regarding policy is decidedly ]. Please think about rewording your comment; just take out the personal attack. Thank you, ] <small>]•]</small> 18:21, 11 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :The reason I think he has a limited intellectual capacity is his refusal or inability to engage in discussion. ] 22:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :The diff is gone, so I'm not disparaging anyone in particular. It's important for newbie editors to know that wikipedia contains this type of individual. ] 22:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::(ec) Because thee only thing that needs to be discussed are the terms of your cease and desist of your attacks and violations of our policies and guidelines. IMO, there are only two ways this can be solved: | |||
| ::'''1.)''' You accept that you are wrong and move on. (''suggested'') | |||
| ::'''2.)''' You do not accept that you are wrong, continue to attack me, keep reverting my edits when the article is unprotected, and you get blocked. | |||
| ::You choose. --<sub>Boricuaeddie is now</sub> ''']]]''' 22:13, 11 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::See what I mean? ] 22:14, 11 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Oh, yeah, 'cause leaving a message on my talk saying "Fuck you" ''so'' demonstrates ''your'' intellectual capacity. --<sub>Boricuaeddie is now</sub> ''']]]''' 22:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Since you ignore anything I say , I have no particular incentive to be polite. ] 22:23, 11 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I don't believe that's a good reason to be rude to other people. Please remember that personal attack is not acceptable at all --] 14:48, 16 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Lauren Cohen (economist) == | |||
| At AFD you did not clearly state your vote for Cohen which should say '''Keep''' if that is your sentiment.--] <small>(]/]/]/]) </small> 19:41, 12 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| For some reason, I had to check out this page and I understand you started it. I think you made a mistake. I doubt very much that this bird is called Keklik. As far as I know, this is the name of a kind of rock partridge, the chukar (''Alectoris chukar''=''A. kakelik''). ] 21:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *I created that for an anon at ]. Let me take a look. ] 21:49, 12 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| As you say, there was another AfD, in which there was a clear consensus to delete. I am obviously aware that a previous AfD produced a vote to keep, but correct procedure requires that we determin consensus on the basis of opinions registered in the current debate. ] is now known as ] and, as you say, this is the place to go to try to get the page reinstated. I personally take no view whatsoever, I merely took note of consensus. If further debate results in the page being restored, then good for you. --]] 23:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == List of Beatles songs == | |||
| With respect to ], I'd appreciate your input at the ]. Just in case your willing to spend further time here with a possibly wikistress reducing activity. Cheers --] 10:24, 13 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi Kappa, thanks a bunch for all the Nigeria-related articles you've been creating. | |||
| With regards to linking to ], two things. One, since it expires to non-subscribers eventually, could you try to link to the original newspaper's website if possible? I tried this with the Daily Champion yesterday or so and it didn't seem to have a copy, but with papers like the Vanguard and the Guardian, direct links can usually be found. Second, I find it best to leave off the Country: prefixes at the beginning of titles, because these are allAfrica's doing, as opposed to being part of the original title. ] ] 02:41, 15 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Good ideas, thanks. ] 02:43, 15 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Speedy deletion of ]== | |||
| ] A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages per ]. | |||
| Under the ], articles that do not meet basic Misplaced Pages criteria may be deleted at any time. Please ], and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. | |||
| If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. ] 13:11, 15 September 2007 (UTC)<!-- Template:Db-csd-notice --> | |||
| == Images == | |||
| I noticed you an image. {{tl|Prod}} is only for articles and the user namespaces; not for images. --''']]]''' 18:49, 15 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :If someone tells you an image is copyvio, you have an obligation to get rid of it. ] 22:35, 15 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I'll try {{tl|db-copyvio}} instead. ] 22:38, 15 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orkney islands== | |||
| Thanks for your comment at ] i.e. "Thank you, I like this list much more now." I am not sure if you intended to voice formal support for the candidature, or if you had further comments or objections. If you could clarify this there I'd much appreciate it. Thanks for your interest in the topic. ] <small>]</small> 21:37, 19 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Many thanks! ] <small>]</small> 21:56, 19 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == WP:ALBUM#Non-English == | |||
| Hi there. Can we please discuss the wording on ]. There are a number of other problems with your wording, but let's start with deciding what we want to say, before we decide how to say it. Please post to ] and describe what it is you wish this section to convey. --] 12:48, 20 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Please, let's discuss this at ]. --] 12:56, 20 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Deprodding== | |||
| If you would be so kind, please assist me in listing all the articles you deprodded on AfD. I'll start at the back end of the alphabet, you start at the front. Thanks, ] 02:08, 21 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :You must be joking. Why don't you find someplace to merge them? ] 02:09, 21 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Merge tags== | |||
| Hi Kappa. When you place merge tags, as you did on ], please create a section on one of the talk pages explaining your reasons for putting the merge template up. Also, please ensure both pages direct to a single page from the 'discuss' link. You can use the code <nowiki>{{Merge|Destination|Discussion page|date=Month 2007|Your name}}</nowiki>. Cheers. ] 06:53, 24 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Hello... == | |||
| There is a user looking for help with a Japanese musical article and you've been recommended (not by me) as a source who might be able to help. Please see the discussion here . I believe the links at the top of your page misidrected her to ]. She's been posting hither and thither for help in quite a few places. I've asked her to keep her discussion to her talk page or the article's talk page. The article in question is ]. Cheers and happy editing, ] ]/] 04:07, 30 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==E. M. Cope Middle School== | |||
| ] | |||
| A {{]}} template has been added to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the ] process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's ], and the deletion notice explains why (see also "]" and ]). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the <code><nowiki>{{dated prod}}</nowiki></code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if ] to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{tl|db-author}}. ] 20:55, 14 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Sierra Vista Mall (second kick at the can) == | |||
| Ummmm...I noticed you ''did not actually'' place a !vote at the ]. I do hope that you do do so, as now I believe the Citations will be able to stand on their own merit. ]<small><small><sup>•]•]•</sup></small></small> 07:41, 21 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==No content in ]== | |||
| ]Hello, this is a message from ]. A tag has been placed on ], by {{#ifeq:{{{nom}}}|1|] (] '''·''' ]),}} another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be ] from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because ] has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (]).<br><br>To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting ], please affix the template <nowiki>{{hangon}}</nowiki> to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at ]. Feel free to contact the ] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click ''' ] (]) 00:00, 20 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Kazumi Tanaka == | |||
| Kappa, you have to help me! Kazumi Tanaka is up for deletion! If it gets deleted, I can't recreate it myself! And if that happens, Christmas is ruined! If I have to ask to have it recreated, there may be almost a 100% chance that it may be kept deleted! You gotta help me!] (]) 02:42, 26 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==FYI, a discussion re: Lists of mammals in X articles== | |||
| I noticed you changed some names of "List of mammals in X region" articles a while back. There's a discussion on how to name those articles at ], and although I assume you'll disagree with me, I'd still appreciate your input. ] (]) 19:05, 31 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==CfD nomination of ]== | |||
| I have nominated {{lc|Female activists}} for renaming to {{lc|Women activists}}. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ]. Thank you. ] (]) 19:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == where has kappa gone? == | |||
| just curious, your talk pages make interesting reading, but I haven't seen anything from you since Oct 20, 2007. | |||
| did you get tired of deprodding? ] (]) 19:31, 4 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :wondering if it had anything to do with your edit summary for http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Sierra_Vista_Mall_%28second_nomination%29&diff=prev&oldid=165798641 ... ] (]) 19:33, 4 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Framingham High School seal.gif== | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at ] carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at ] is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. | |||
| If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->] (]) 21:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Heros == | |||
| I added some cites to ], an article you created, when it kept being scrapped for a dab for want of references. If you happen to have citations of your own that you used to create it back then, please add them too. Cheers! -- ] (]) 00:29, 27 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Speedy deletion of ]== | |||
| ] A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please ], as well as our subject-specific ]. | |||
| If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. {{#ifeq: {{{willprovide}}}|No||Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact ] to request that a copy be emailed to you.}} — ''']]'''<sup>]</sup> <big>'''/'''</big><small> ]</small> 09:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC)<!-- Template:Db-bio-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> | |||
| :As I said on the article's talk page, I was kind of tired(3am) when I clicked some buttons. Hence I placed a <nowiki>{{hangon}}</nowiki> tag to stop it from happening. I'm really sorry about this.— ''']]'''<sup>]</sup> <big>'''/'''</big><small> ]</small> 10:01, 2 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Wardrobe malfunction == | |||
| The current consensus is that the aticle is merged/redirect to that superbowl article. Please discuss your edits first on the discussion page of either article before reverting again. ] ] 13:25, 11 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Bad faith? At least I kept the bad article instead of just the redirect. Stop talking nonsense. ] ] 15:52, 11 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Oh, and be civil, it really is not that hard. Calling other editors "thug friends" is not acceptable. ] ] 21:48, 11 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==CfD nomination of Category:Atomic Kitten== | |||
| ]''']''', which you created, has been nominated for ], ], or ]. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. – ] (]) 04:49, 12 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Arab City Schools== | |||
| ] | |||
| A ] template has been added to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's ], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "]" and ]). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if ] to delete is reached. <small>Do you want to ] of receiving this notice?</small><!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] <small>(] • ]).</small> 17:33, 15 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Speedy deletion of ]== | |||
| ] A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our ] as well as the ] for more information. | |||
| If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact ] to request that a copy be emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-spam-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> | |||
| ==Speedy deletion of ]== | |||
| ] A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our ] as well as the ] for more information. | |||
| If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact ] to request that a copy be emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-spam-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> | |||
| ==Proposed deletion of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| A ] template has been added to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's ], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "]" and ]). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if ] to delete is reached. <small>Do you want to ] of receiving this notice?</small><!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 23:30, 4 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==AfD nomination of Dan Dan Kokoro Hikareteku== | |||
| ] ], an article you contributed to, has been nominated for ] (]). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address the concerns raised in the AfD. Thank you for your time. -- ] <sup>(])</sup> 08:39, 6 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==AfD nomination of Carol Cummings== | |||
| ]I have nominated ], an article you created, for ]. I do not feel that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. <small>Do you want to ] of receiving this notice?</small><!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ] (]) 21:29, 6 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==AfD nomination of List of video games set in New York City== | |||
| ]I have nominated ], an article you created, for ]. I do not feel that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. <small>Do you want to ] of receiving this notice?</small><!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>(]•])</sup> 21:25, 8 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi. Are you still using this subpage? - ] (]) 00:37, 17 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==AfD nomination of Pleinair== | |||
| ]I have nominated ], an article you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ] (]) 17:51, 16 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Proposed deletion of 14 Year Old Girls== | |||
| ] | |||
| A ] template has been added to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's ], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "]" and ]). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if ] to delete is reached.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 19:51, 5 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Speedy deletion of ]== | |||
| ] A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason: | |||
| {{center|'''''Fails WP:BIO as there are no reliable, independent third party sources beyond a mention in a BBC article in passing'''''}} | |||
| Under the ], articles that do not meet basic Misplaced Pages criteria may be deleted at any time. Please ], and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> on the top of the page and leave a note on ] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. | |||
| For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria ], ], ], or ]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn-reason --> ] 17:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ]I notice that ] is unpopulated (empty). In other words, no Misplaced Pages pages belong to (are members of) it. If it remains unpopulated for four days, it may be deleted, without discussion, in accordance with ]. I'm notifying you, the creator of the category, in case you wish to (re-)populate it by adding <nowiki>]</nowiki> to articles/categories that belong in it. | |||
| I have also blanked the category page. This will not, in itself, cause the category to be deleted. It serves to document (in the page history) that the category was empty at the time of blanking and also to alert other watchers that the category is in jeopardy. You are welcome to ] the blanking if you wish. However, doing so will not prevent deletion if the category remains empty. | |||
| If you created the category in error, or it is no longer needed, you can speed up the deletion process by tagging it with {{tl|db-author}}. | |||
| --] (]) 20:33, 10 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==AfD nomination of Raggacore== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ] and his otters • <sup>(] • ] • ])</sup> 21:39, 12 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Proposed deletion of Charlene Aspen== | |||
| ] | |||
| A ] template has been added to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process  because of the following concern: | |||
| :<b>fails WP:PORNBIO as recently made more restrictive, no other indication of notability</b> | |||
| All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's ], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "]" and ]). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if ] to delete is reached.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 22:13, 14 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ] (]) 02:43, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :To clarify, you created a redirect here which was later turned into a somewhat promotional article by IP editors. Probably nothing you need to worry about here, Twinkle did this automatically. ] (]) 03:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Proposed deletion of Icfai icfai icfai== | |||
| ] | |||
| A ] template has been added to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process  because of the following concern: | |||
| :<b>Implausible redirect</b> | |||
| All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's ], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "]" and ]). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if ] to delete is reached.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 04:55, 10 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under the ], because it is a redirect from an implausible typo. | |||
| Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that ] wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template '''<code>{{tl|hangon}}</code>''' to the page and state your intention on the article's ]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Redirnone-warn --> ] (]) 08:46, 10 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Unreferenced BLPs== | |||
| ] Hello Kappa! Thank you for your contributions. I am a ] alerting you that '''16''' of the articles that you created are ]. Please note that all biographies of living persons '''must be sourced'''. If you were to add ], ] ] to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current '']'' article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list: | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Kawachiya Kikusuimaru}}</small> | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Anthony Andrews}}</small> | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Kenji Ozawa}}</small> | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Irun Cohen}}</small> | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Connor Price}}</small> | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Kim Seung-kew}}</small> | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Valdemar Castillo}}</small> | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Marcial Mes}}</small> | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Mendi Msimang}}</small> | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Gerald Rhaburn}}</small> | |||
| {{collapsetop|More...}} | |||
| 11. ] | |||
| 12. ] | |||
| 13. ] | |||
| 14. ] | |||
| 15. ] | |||
| 16. ] | |||
| {{collapsebottom}} | |||
| Thanks!--] (]) 20:17, 2 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Survey on quality control policies == | |||
| As part of a project funded by the European Commission (), we are collecting and analysing data to study '''quality control mechanisms and inclusion/deletion policies''' in Misplaced Pages. According to our records, you participated in a large number of AfD. We are currently soliciting editors with a long record of participation in AfD discussions to send us their feedback via a very informal survey. | |||
| The survey takes less than 5 minutes and is available at ''''''. | |||
| Should you have any questions about this project, feel free to . | |||
| Thanks for your help! --] (]) 10:11, 6 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==] of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| :'''Unsourced stub which fails to establish notability.''' | |||
| While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 12:43, 10 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] nomination of ] == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ] (]) 15:25, 10 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==] of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why. | |||
| While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> Chocolate4921 14:42, 9 May 2010 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:End of the moonlight.jpg== | |||
| <span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| '''PLEASE NOTE:''' | |||
| * I am a ], and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. | |||
| * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again. | |||
| * If you receive this notice ''after'' the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request. | |||
| * To opt out of these bot messages, add <code><nowiki>{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}</nowiki></code> to your talk page. | |||
| *If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off ] and leave a message on ]. | |||
| Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 05:23, 27 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Fair use rationale for File:Donkey Konga - Super Mario theme screenshot.png== | |||
| ] | |||
| Thanks for uploading or contributing to ''']'''. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under ] but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages constitutes fair use. Please go to ] and edit it to include a ]. | |||
| If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> ] (]) 13:27, 27 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion has begun about whether the article ], which you created or to which you contributed, should be ]. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion. | |||
| You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ] (]) 16:49, 31 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Fair use rationale for File:Milkacow.JPG== | |||
| ] | |||
| Thanks for uploading or contributing to ''']'''. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under ] but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages constitutes fair use. Please go to ] and edit it to include a ]. | |||
| If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> ] (]) 17:35, 21 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Female athletes== | |||
| ]''']''', which you created, has been nominated for ], ], or ]. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you.--] (]) 06:42, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==] of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| :'''] organization whose current status is entirely unclear''' | |||
| While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 12:30, 24 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==] of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| :'''(1) This list does not fulfill any of the allowable purposes for lists under ], in that it does not (a) organise or annotate information so as to provide unique content, (b) provide an aid to navigation within the scope of an encyclopaedic topic, or (c) act as a guide to development of content within an encyclopaedic topic. (2) This list does not present information on a ], and further, provides no references or citations such as to support the notability of its topic. (3) This list does not contain any verifable content.''' | |||
| While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 02:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| :'''A7 -- no indicia of notability.''' | |||
| While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 06:16, 18 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| :'''A7 -- no indicia of notability.''' | |||
| While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 06:22, 18 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| {{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please ]. | |||
| If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion (<code><nowiki>{{db-...}}</nowiki></code>) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the ''']''' to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact ] to request that the administrator ] the page or email a copy to you. <!-- Template:Db-notability-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 18:55, 31 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| :'''Fails ]''' | |||
| While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml"> ''']'''</span> ] 14:53, 2 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Cry wolf listed at ] == | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Cry wolf'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 18:44, 3 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| {{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article appears to be a clear ] infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''sentences''. This part is crucial: ''say it in your own words''. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators '''will be ]'''. | |||
| If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Misplaced Pages to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you ''must'' verify that externally by one of the processes explained at ]. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see ]. You might want to look at ] for more details, or ask a question ]. | |||
| If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit ''']''' to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. <!-- Template:Db-copyvio-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 07:56, 3 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ''''']]''''' 23:29, 11 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Milkacow.JPG== | |||
| <span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 03:58, 26 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == ]== | |||
| When this article was nominated for AfD in 2005 you were involved in the discussion. It has now been nominated again. This is a notification in case you are still interested in taking part in the debate. Regards, ] (]) 09:37, 3 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| :'''School no longer exists, page lives on at ]''' | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 19:45, 8 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| :'''fails PORNBIO, all awards/noms scene-related, no RS bio content''' | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 22:13, 17 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] <small>]</small> 01:07, 23 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Category:Tree frogs== | |||
| ''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] <small>] • (])</small> 12:10, 19 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| :'''Non-notable minor television service; requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. None provided, nor found in Google News.''' | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> -- ] (]) 02:22, 15 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Proposed deletion of Brighton Road == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| :'''I am unconvinced of this article's notability. Perhaps a disambiguation page would be better?''' | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <span style="background:#FF0;font-family:Rockwell Extra Bold">]]]</span> 15:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> <span style="background:#FF0;font-family:Rockwell Extra Bold">]]]</span> 23:46, 22 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 22:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==Hello== | |||
| Can you help editing ] or ] of romanian football ? I have seen you edited before articles with romanian football related. If everyone will edit one season, all the competition will be done in one weekend ! Thank you !--] (]) 14:02, 4 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| {{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not ] how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about ]. | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. <!-- Template:Db-notability-notice --> -- ] 23:48, 5 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Proposed deletion of Shaun Pizzonia == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| :'''Although producing all of those listed singles may be acceptable for an article, my searches found nothing better than a few passing mentions at Books, News and browsers therefore nothing to suggest a better solidly notable article.''' | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] ] 07:15, 10 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Proposed deletion of Tony Eveready == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| :'''Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No porn awards or nominations. Only reliable sourcing relates to his moderately length but generally non-noteworthy criminal history.''' | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 19:08, 22 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 23:15, 23 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==] has been nominated for discussion== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which you created, has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. | |||
| == Proposed deletion category:Round Square schools page== | |||
| Hi, i'm not sure if i'm doing this right, but I'm looking for the person who created the category:Round Square schools page. The information on the page is wrong and details a lot of schools who are not member schools and this has been notice by a member of the Round Square board. Please remove this page. Just been asked by the Misplaced Pages team to declare my conflict of interest. I'm the Comms Manager from Round Square.<small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 09:26, 15 February 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Proposed deletion of Bionic Tower == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| :'''It seems after since 2006, this building had never existed at all. Fails ] for buildings, no references.''' | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 15:44, 20 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 15:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because it is an ] disambiguation page which either | |||
| :::*disambiguates two or fewer extant Misplaced Pages pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a ]); or | |||
| :::* disambiguates no (zero) extant Misplaced Pages pages, regardless of its title. | |||
| Under the ], such pages may be deleted at any time. Please ]. | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-disambig-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ]] 08:52, 2 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Proposed deletion of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| :'''Like ], another magazine with the same name, this magazine also fails the notability guidelines. Tagged as unreferenced since May 2008.''' | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (], ]) 02:11, 14 January 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ], 23:14, 31 January 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| {{ping|Kappa}} Article was renominated for deletion. Since you have contributed to this ], I want you to be aware of this deletion and to weigh in on the decision again. ''] <sup>]</sup>'' 16:13, 19 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| {{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} | |||
| A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read ] and ] for more information. | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Pechersk+School+International|deleting administrator}}. <!-- Template:Db-spam-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] ] 14:34, 8 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| {{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} | |||
| A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read ] and ] for more information. | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Pechersk+School+International|deleting administrator}}. <!-- Template:Db-spam-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] ] 14:52, 8 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] ] 15:19, 8 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the image '''is an unused redundant copy''' (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Misplaced Pages (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated. | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-redundantimage-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family: Papyrus">] ] </span> 09:39, 31 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Deletion discussion about ] == | |||
| Hello, Kappa, | |||
| I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Grand Theft Auto: Vice City soundtrack should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at ]. | |||
| If you're new to the process, ] is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on ]. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. | |||
| Thanks, | |||
| ] <sup>]</sup> 11:02, 11 May 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 23:11, 23 July 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| {{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} | |||
| A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under two or more of the ], by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are: | |||
| * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See ].) Please read ] and ] for more information. | |||
| *It appears to be a clear ] infringement of http://www.buckscollegegroup.ac.uk/welcome. (See ].) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''sentences''. This part is crucial: ''say it in your own words''. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators '''will be ]'''. <p>If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Misplaced Pages to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you ''must'' verify that externally by one of the processes explained at ]. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see ]. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Misplaced Pages, it still needs to comply with the other ] to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the ].</p> | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 02:30, 13 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| {{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not ] how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about ]. | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=JDBUG|deleting administrator}}. <!-- Template:Db-notability-notice --> ] (]) 22:39, 8 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ==] has been nominated for discussion== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ''' —''' ] (]) (])  02:25, 2 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>(])</sup> 09:54, 13 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] ]<sup>]</sup> (]). 21:05, 21 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| <blockquote>does not appear to meet notability requirements</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 13:06, 19 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 22:29, 16 September 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| <blockquote>Non notable show that clearly fails WP:GNG for lack of significant coverage from reliable secondary sources.</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 23:05, 9 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ==] has been nominated for discussion== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. <b>]</b><sup> ]</sup> 17:14, 27 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Dark aeons listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Dark aeons'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you wish to do so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 13:18, 9 May 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ==] has been nominated for discussion== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 05:26, 15 May 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 20:09, 4 July 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Immigrant Fleet listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Immigrant Fleet'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you wish to do so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <sub><small>] (])</small></sub> 03:08, 6 July 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == "Spiritual Stones" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Spiritual Stones'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you wish to do so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <sub><small>] (])</small></sub> 03:49, 5 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ♠]♠ ] 12:41, 17 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| <blockquote>Non notable topic</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 21:44, 28 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 10:31, 8 March 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] | <sup> ]</sup> 15:09, 21 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 02:38, 6 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <b style="font-family:Kristen ITC">]]<sup>]</sup></b> 18:00, 31 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a ], a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 14:20, 17 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> '''<span style="background:#4682B4;padding:3px;">]</span><span style="background:white;padding:2px;border:solid 1px #4682B4">]</span>''' 12:43, 21 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''', to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | |||
| The discussion will take place at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
| To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:03, 17 November 2020 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> | |||
| == "14th milennium BC" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 19:40, 9 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 09:50, 8 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| <blockquote>'''Very limited notability about the school. Outside the two New York Times articles which mention the school but in passing, notability is not met here.'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 00:33, 2 January 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 17:44, 6 January 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| <blockquote>'''] isolated page.'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> | |||
| '''<span style="color: red;">This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual page for details.</span>''' Thanks, ] (]) 10:00, 6 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == "G.D. Goenka School" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] 14:15, 10 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == "National Party(New Zealand)" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 19:13, 6 April 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. | |||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (she/her • ] • ]) 07:29, 27 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| <blockquote>'''A porn film actress and porn director lacking significant coverage in multiple reliable sources so that ] is not passed. Of the sources in the article IMDb is not a reliable source, porn industry sources are not independent and the New York Times article does not mention her at all. A seach on Google found nothing better.'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 00:06, 21 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. | |||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 21:22, 27 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| <blockquote>'''Fails ]. Non-notable school lacking significant coverage in reliable sources.'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 13:19, 13 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. | |||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 12:31, 13 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason: | |||
| <blockquote>Implausible all-caps</blockquote> | |||
| Under the ], pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time. | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=MAYPOLE+TRADITION+IN+BAVARIA|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request ]. <!-- Template:Db-reason-notice --> ] (]) 16:19, 27 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 27#MAYPOLE TRADITION IN BAVARIA}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] ] 17:38, 27 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. | |||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 17:07, 30 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. | |||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 17:18, 8 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 02:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ==] has been nominated for renaming== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 22:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| <blockquote>'''No Secondary sources for establishing notability are available, doesn't comply with WP:GNG'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 22:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 09:31, 20 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:31, 20 October 2024
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Kappa has not edited Misplaced Pages since June 2008. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
" I'm right, and he is wrong. There is nothing to discuss." Agüeybaná (talk · contribs · logs)
This is the talk page of User:Kappa. Hi.
Previous discussions: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6
Greeting
thanks for the additional info on PUTO, highly appreciate that. Ronelio 20:00, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Deprodding
While it's certainly not required, when deprodding an article it's generally considered polite to explain your objections to deletion on the article's talk page. This may also help to prevent unnecessary AfD requests by laying out the arguments against deletion before it's sent there. Thanks! Seraphimblade 03:19, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Well quite often the prod tag just says "nn-X" or whatever, and I simply disagree with that assessment as grounds for deletion. If some kind of evidence-based discussion is provided I am more likely to respond in kind - and often (well occasionally anyway LOL) I can be persuaded that deletion is necessary. Kappa 03:46, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- As noted, it's considered good form to note your objection to the prod rather than just removing it, as you did at Holla at Me. And in the case of the Les Miz songs if you remove them with the notion that they should be merged somewhere, you have IMHO taken it upon yourself to do the merge work involved. Otto4711 11:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Afghan companies list
The reason why I suggested it be deleted is that it *is* confusing. The list on this page is only partial. People come to this page thinking they've found **the** list - but in fact they've missed about half the companies. Check out Category:Companies of Afghanistan to see what I mean. If we keep it who will maintain it? Categories are at least self maintaining. Egfrank 14:01, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- Well OK I've just been through the category system to find all the Afghan companies I could, and it was a very unpleasant experience. I think it's worth keeping the list in order to spare at least some users the same amount of wasted time. Kappa 14:47, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- I just saw the warnings and links you put at the top. I think that is a great compromise. Thanks. And thanks for the example of how to link to a category. I wasn't sure how to do that. Egfrank 20:16, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- Also what made it unpleasant? I'd like to think about ways to make the category system more usable -- Egfrank 20:16, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Broom (clean)
Hi. Before you deprod things like Broom (clean) please do some research and please assume that the prod tag was put up by someone that did his. You are wasting everyone's time by sending this to AfD. If you truly had evidence that this was worthy of an article then please at least go defend it on AfD. If you have no argument then please do not deprod. When you deprod things at the rate of 2 a minute as you did yesterday for instance you are clearly not doing research and your negligence is an imposition on the other editors who are spending time to clean up Misplaced Pages. Pascal.Tesson 21:12, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- The prod tag said "Not notable" which implies the prodder felt no research was necessary. If the article is supposed to be unverifiable or an exaggeration, that should be confirmed by AFD. Kappa 23:01, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
AfDs on songs
I've noticed your name turning up on a couple of song AfDs recently, talking about deletion as a "betrayal of fans" and things like that. The songs are never nominated for deletion to "betray fans" or anything like that. It's always a case of whether or not a given song is in fact notable. I'll be the first to admit that there are some album tracks by some of my favourite artists which I'd love to see an article on here, but just because a song is a real fan favourite doesn't necessarily mean it's notable in a wider sense. BigHaz - Schreit mich an (Review me) 07:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- Betrayal is the result if its deleted. Someone who listens to a song and wants to know what it's about or how it was inspired doesn't care if its "notable" or not. Kappa 15:58, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- True enough, but why then are we honour bound to have an article on each and every song by each and every singer or band? At least 50% of the articles in the AfD this all referred to were just written along the lines of "X is a song by Y on album Z. It was written by Joe Bloggs". This doesn't tell me anything I can't gain from the liner notes of the average album. Sure, there's no limit to the number of articles we can have in this encyclopedia, but why do we have things like WP:MUSIC/SONG if every song in the world is allowed in so that fans can find out about it? My apologies for a delayed response, by the way, your Talk page had somehow fallen off my watchlist. BigHaz - Schreit mich an (Review me) 00:39, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- You aren't honour bound to have a seperate article for every recorded song by a notable band but as far as I am concerned you are honour bound to attempt to explain and discuss it somewhere. If someone has written a description of the song and you delete it (rather than merging) just because you don't think it belongs on a separate page, you are betraying your audience who may not have access to the liner notes or the song itself. (Regarding your watchlist, I think there might be something wrong with my archiving technique.) Kappa 05:13, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- True enough, but why then are we honour bound to have an article on each and every song by each and every singer or band? At least 50% of the articles in the AfD this all referred to were just written along the lines of "X is a song by Y on album Z. It was written by Joe Bloggs". This doesn't tell me anything I can't gain from the liner notes of the average album. Sure, there's no limit to the number of articles we can have in this encyclopedia, but why do we have things like WP:MUSIC/SONG if every song in the world is allowed in so that fans can find out about it? My apologies for a delayed response, by the way, your Talk page had somehow fallen off my watchlist. BigHaz - Schreit mich an (Review me) 00:39, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Yenta Claus
I am trying to figure out what is wrong and was wondering if labeling the AfD as biographical by an editor was the right place for a holiday folk hero?--Cuddles 03:33, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
- Well "what is wrong" seems to be that there isn't enough verifiable evidence out there to prove that it's an established, or even an emerging, cultural phenomenon. I know not everything is on google, but unfortunately wikipedia has to demand evidence (although it's inconsistent, I know). I know you worked hard to provide it and it's a pity if the article still gets deleted. My feeling is that this is a real but currently unverifiable thing, hopefully more evidence will appear with time. If you could find it in a couple more books, that would probably be enough, or it might get more net coverage during the holiday season.
- Thank you for your interest in Yenta Claus, but alas she must be a myth, an urban legend have you, and besides, she was simply too good to be true. Maybe? Thanks for the tip, but I believe Hanukkah Harry is about to get the Wiki Axe. Too sad. BTW, Is there really a Yenta Claus or not? Merry what ever you celebrate and just a friendly hello. Have a bright life, Yenta Claus :-) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.41.86.146 (talk • contribs) .
- There are other places that will accept your article, perhaps wikinfo or other alternatives to wp. I'm sorry you have had such an unpleasant experience here. Also it's clearly not a biography so I've recategorized it to "society" where it fits a little better. Kappa 04:14, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
- P.S. Even if it's deleted, with the current evidence you might be able to mention Yenta in another article like Hanukkah Harry. Kappa 04:15, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
De-Prodding etc
Hi, just a quick request to be more specific with your reasons for de-prodding in various music related articles. Particularly, it's a bit confusing to see WP:MUSIC as a reason to de-PROD when an article clearly makes no attempt to assert that it meets the requirements. Thanks... (No more bongos 12:42, 19 September 2006 (UTC))
- Do you want to be more specific here? Kappa 15:14, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- If you are talking about Lotta Engbergs... Kappa 15:16, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Partly that one; partly a couple of others I noticed on some page histories, and partly some stuff in AFDs a while back... I'm not criticising you or saying your deprodding/voting is necessarily wrong, but it might be helpful to explain your reasoning in certain situations. No more bongos 19:52, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed, what was your reason for deproding Luminary (album), and for removing the linkless template, as the article is linked to by only one non-user space article? Do you have any evidence that the album is notable? Swpb 01:03, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- It's an album by Adeyto who seems notable so I deprodded it. One link seems sufficient for an album, but put the template back if you like. Kappa 01:09, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
B. H. Carroll Theological Institute
Just wanted to let you know I put the notability tag back in because the AfD survived only because of no consensus. Perhaps if notability is asserted it would convince those who voted delete that it meets wikipedia standards. Arbusto 16:06, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Notability tags, like AFD tags, are for editors not for users. Leaving them on an article permanently just defaces the article and clogs up the category. 17:49, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- 1) What's the difference between an editor and user? 2) Tags aren't "permanently" on articles, but are left to address concerns. I guess it is possible that a tag can be left "permanently" if that concern is not addressed, but I am not aware of a situation. I believe you should reinsert the tag or provide proof that it meets notability standards. Arbusto 22:52, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- "User" = "reader". A notability tag is there to warn editors that the article is likely to fail an AFD - well it survived the AFD so the tag is now redundant. Frankly I'm not very interested in defending this thing, but it took all of 30 seconds to find more nontrivial independent third-party coverage. Kappa 23:00, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- 1) What's the difference between an editor and user? 2) Tags aren't "permanently" on articles, but are left to address concerns. I guess it is possible that a tag can be left "permanently" if that concern is not addressed, but I am not aware of a situation. I believe you should reinsert the tag or provide proof that it meets notability standards. Arbusto 22:52, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- It survived due to a lack of consensus, which means it may very well be up for a AfD again for lack of notability. How does that link meet WP:CORP? Arbusto 23:07, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- See WP:CORP #1. Kappa 01:31, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
- It survived due to a lack of consensus, which means it may very well be up for a AfD again for lack of notability. How does that link meet WP:CORP? Arbusto 23:07, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- You are asserting two religious websites are meet CORP #1? CORP #1: "The product or service has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself." So is church news is considered "non-trival" and independent of the school? Can you find any mainstream news article on it? Or any famous faculty? That would meet notability standards. Arbusto 05:40, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
- Also you do know the sources you cited noted this unaccredited school does not have classes, but it does distance learning on the internet and at various churches? Arbusto 06:08, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
- That fact merits mention in the lead, so I've promoted it. As far as I'm concerned it passes WP:CORP but I'm not very interested in defending it so I'm not going bother looking for other notability. Regarding WP:CORP, a requirement for mainstream coverage is too restrictive for an all-purpose encylopedia. The coverage seems clearly nontrivial (trivial: "school holds car boot sale") and I don't believe the institution is in a position to control the church-related press - if it does that shows a different kind of importance. Since this is a tertiary institution, I think the question we should try to answer is "do they have legitimate tertiary-level staff?". Kappa 02:03, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Bratz characters
I notice that you removed a PROD tag I'd added to various Bratz characters with the summary WP:MERGE. However, I don't think it's appropriate that the level of detailed information on the subpages should be added to the List of Bratz characters page. This was discussed with Alcy, who created most of these pages, in the context of the AfD discussion on Ciara (Bratz character).
Please respond as to how we should now proceed, as I'm anxious not to waste community effort on so many pages by taking them all to AfD unless it's essential to develop a consensus. Thanks. Espresso Addict 21:46, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
- If Alcy doesn't mind there's no problem redirecting to the list. Kappa 01:04, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- OK, I've proposed this on the various talk pages. Espresso Addict 02:27, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Concerning Sun and Steel (essay)
Thanks for your effort; and I must really learn to use the CSD-numbers (A7). The article in the deleted version didn't, at least imho, assert the notability of the subject. But I would have undeleted it anyway. Cheers. Lectonar 14:18, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Kansas City (disambiguation)
Hello. Can you explain why you reverted the Kansas City (disambiguation) page? Nothing links there. There is already a disambig page at Kansas City. If people search they get the real disambig page, so what purpose does it serve? --Hobbes747 14:39, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- If someone links to or searches for that title, they will be taken to where they want to go, instead of being invited to create a new article there. Kappa 16:52, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
A little bit late
Erm... roughly half a year ago, thanks for the close shave on the South Western AfD. Simply south 23:11, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Votestacking
Regarding You have been on wiki long enough to know that votestacking and internal spamming are unacceptable. Please stop. JoshuaZ 21:06, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- You are trying to remove our voice from wikipedia, thanks for reminding me that I'm not trying hard enough to prevent this. Kappa 01:49, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Your contributions history shows that you have been aggressively cross-posting in order to influence http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2006_September_22#Finger_Lakes_Christian_School. Although the Arbitration Committee has ruled that "he occasional light use of cross-posting to talk pages is part of Misplaced Pages's common practice", such cross-posting should adhere to specific guidelines found in Misplaced Pages:Spam. In the past, aggressively worded cross-posting has contributed towards an Arbitration Committee ruling of disruptive behavior that resulted in blocking. It is best not to game the system, and instead respect Misplaced Pages's principle of consensus-building, by ceasing to further crosspost, and instead allowing the process to reflect the opinions of editors that were already actively involved in the matter at hand. Thank you. YDAM TALK 02:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- This issue is relevant to every inclusionist wikipedian, because if deletionist admins can ignore us at will it effectively means the end of the inclusionist voice in wikipedian affairs. Kappa 02:38, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- It is relevant to all sides of the debate. Perhaps you could inform those members of Category:Deletionist Wikipedians as well to ensure a fair debate YDAM TALK 02:43, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- I think it would be rather divisive to go and invite wikipedians to endorse the stance that the views of those who disagree with them are "absurd" and should be dismissed. Your mileage may vary. Kappa 02:45, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- It is relevant to all sides of the debate. Perhaps you could inform those members of Category:Deletionist Wikipedians as well to ensure a fair debate YDAM TALK 02:43, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Kappa, please stop. If you continue, I am going to ask another admin to block you. JoshuaZ 02:46, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- Please stop indeed. I find that mass posting to be disruptive. Please find some other venue of dealing with this issue. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 02:55, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- What do you suggest? Kappa 02:56, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- Two things. Vote Stacking gains nothing. An appeal for help is one thing, if you know that the editor in question has a history of supporting the topic in question. secondly, I am willing to take a look at it. Could you give me a link of an old version that I can take a look at to determine its notability. Misplaced Pages's False Prophet holla at me Improve Me 03:06, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- I don't quite know what to suggest, but mass-posting is not the way to go, no matter how strongly you feel about the issue. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- I have listed this issue at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Spamming for DRV --After Midnight 04:02, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- People have the right to be informed before they get stabbed in the back, not after. Kappa 04:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- Following policy is not stabbing people in the back. Also see my comment below. JoshuaZ 04:53, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- Not informing people that "policy" is suddenly disenfranchising them is stabbing them in the back. Kappa 05:50, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- I believe that you were warned at 2106-UTC on the 25th and that at 0149-UTC on the 26th, you stated that you were going to knowingly violate policy, since your message above was immediately before you began your second wave. --After Midnight 10:22, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- Informing editors about their potential loss of voice in wikipedia discussions is not a violation of any reasonable interpretation of policy. Kappa 01:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- My misunderstanding; since your comment immediately followed mine, I assumed that you were saying that my listing of the issue at AN/I was a stab in your back. My response to you was therefore my explaination of why I felt my actions were not as so characterized. Obviously, I did not understand you correctly and your clarification renders my response of 10:22-26-Sep-2006 moot. --After Midnight 02:20, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Informing editors about their potential loss of voice in wikipedia discussions is not a violation of any reasonable interpretation of policy. Kappa 01:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Following policy is not stabbing people in the back. Also see my comment below. JoshuaZ 04:53, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- People have the right to be informed before they get stabbed in the back, not after. Kappa 04:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Votestacking
Behavior like this is unacceptable, and boderline gaming the system. Stop it or you will be blocked for disruption. Yanksox 03:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- Your spam also contained an error, because you forgot a colon in the Category link, putting all these users' talk pages in the category. Also, about half of these users are totally inactive. These are the least of the problems with your spamming. —Centrx→talk • 04:05, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- I am not spamming or votestacking, I am informing editors of an issue which affects all of us. Kappa 04:48, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- Kappa, have you read WP:SPAM#Canvassing? This is a textbook example. JoshuaZ 04:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- I am not spamming or votestacking, I am informing editors of an issue which affects all of us. Kappa 04:48, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- Kappa you posted an "Appeal for you to help" On my userpage discussion. I agree with joshuaZ, that was a direct violation of WP:SPAM#Canvassing. Though I do consider myself an Inclusionist, an article must first have "Good content" to be considered for inclusion.
- Also do me a favor and read: WP:POINT, It might help you understand what's going on here.Defraggler 13:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- Your User Contributions show that you've made a bizarre number of requests that inclusionists visit a debate. It is spam. It is votestacking. Ironically, your plea for one inclusionist to join the debate brought the issue to my attention when I was visiting his user page. Why ironic? Because my contribution to the deletion review was to say that it needed to stay deleted. Spamming like that may just alienate some inclusionists and lure some deletionists. Wryspy 06:03, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Desperate situations require desperate measures. Kappa 02:05, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Kappa, are you still unwilling to acknowledge that votestacking is wrong and disruptive? JoshuaZ 02:48, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Schools AfD et ali.
Now, now, I understand your worry in a possible full-out war on high school deletions, etc. I am one person who have lived to see through all these carnage and how the debate has eventually evolved. And back then, someone actually got killed in the process. Please, I don't wish to see you becoming the next casualty, don't mass post messages on fellow editors anymore.
The main arguement that can only currently override the whole agreement on retaining school-related articles is simply verifiability, and fulfilling that through providing reliable sources will almost always solve the problem. Even if there are editors out there who wants to escalate these, please, don't add onto it.
- Best regards, Mailer Diablo 10:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- If admins get to impose their own personal standard of notability and ignore all dissenting opinions, no amount of verifiability will make any difference. Kappa 01:21, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- If users get to impose their way by spamming a particular section of voters to get their own way then lack of notablity won't make any difference either. Arbusto 02:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- You don't seem to have been following the discussion. Kappa 02:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- If users get to impose their way by spamming a particular section of voters to get their own way then lack of notablity won't make any difference either. Arbusto 02:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Going back to Mailer diablo's comments, I don't see much evolution in the debate, we still waiting patiently for deletionists to accept some kind of compromise based on merging. Kappa 02:45, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Propose a policy for it that isn't wrapped up in ridiculously inclusionist keep policies like WP:SCHOOLS is and the "deletionists" might consider it. JoshuaZ 02:50, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Would you agree with Mailer diablo that "main arguement that can only currently override the whole agreement on retaining school-related articles is simply verifiability, and fulfilling that through providing reliable sources will almost always solve the problem." Kappa 03:30, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Somewhat. In practice this seems to not even be true as the recent "compromise" with the DRV indicates (where it wasn't even clear to me that the school met WP:V). Among other issues with the statement I don't think there is some "whole agreement" about these, merely a well-organized push by a group for keeping the articles. However, this doesn't alter that I would (and I suspect many others) would be willing to consider a general merger proposal if it weren't tied into generous keep conclusions but was made as a separate item. JoshuaZ 05:10, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- To be honest, I haven't heard of the terms "deletionist-inclusionist" for a long time since the era of Votes for Deletion. Traditionally as a trend high-school articles are usually kept, and it is also up to the quality of the school article itself. Notability is now less used as an arugement for deletion, now mainly superceded by verifiability. Just so that you know and get updated of the deletion culture at the moment. Don't get worked up, don't worry, I do not see we are ever going to undergo a repeat procedure of the Userbox Wars where thousands of school articles are put into the fire-range. - Mailer Diablo 09:33, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Somewhat. In practice this seems to not even be true as the recent "compromise" with the DRV indicates (where it wasn't even clear to me that the school met WP:V). Among other issues with the statement I don't think there is some "whole agreement" about these, merely a well-organized push by a group for keeping the articles. However, this doesn't alter that I would (and I suspect many others) would be willing to consider a general merger proposal if it weren't tied into generous keep conclusions but was made as a separate item. JoshuaZ 05:10, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Would you agree with Mailer diablo that "main arguement that can only currently override the whole agreement on retaining school-related articles is simply verifiability, and fulfilling that through providing reliable sources will almost always solve the problem." Kappa 03:30, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Propose a policy for it that isn't wrapped up in ridiculously inclusionist keep policies like WP:SCHOOLS is and the "deletionists" might consider it. JoshuaZ 02:50, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Per your vote
Per your AfD vote I would like to point out that the wanted poster is not of the subject of the article and is of an unrelated person. The issue has been brought to AN/I regarding Geo Swan's reinsertion of the image and FBI information after already admitting they are unrelated. --NuclearUmpf 04:08, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Hmmm. Kappa 04:47, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- There is discussion on the talk page regarding it, and you can see the names are quite different. Geo Swan states he discovered the link himself by assessing that arab names are hard to illiterate and the FBI must have been mistaken. Feel free to use my talk page if you need further info, I dont want you to feel like im pushing you, just wanted to bring that to your attention. I have tried removing it, he just keeps reverting. --NuclearUmpf 04:57, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for bringing it to my attention. It's not clear to me if it belongs in the article or not but I won't base my AFD opinion on it. Kappa 04:59, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- NuclearUmpf is mischaracterizing me here, and on the administrator's noteboard. I didn't say what he says I said. -- Geo Swan 18:12, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- "I don't think you understand. It doesn't matter whether they are the same person. I didn't assert they are the same person" --NuclearUmpf 18:41, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- NuclearUmpf is mischaracterizing me here, and on the administrator's noteboard. I didn't say what he says I said. -- Geo Swan 18:12, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for bringing it to my attention. It's not clear to me if it belongs in the article or not but I won't base my AFD opinion on it. Kappa 04:59, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- There is discussion on the talk page regarding it, and you can see the names are quite different. Geo Swan states he discovered the link himself by assessing that arab names are hard to illiterate and the FBI must have been mistaken. Feel free to use my talk page if you need further info, I dont want you to feel like im pushing you, just wanted to bring that to your attention. I have tried removing it, he just keeps reverting. --NuclearUmpf 04:57, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Cotwall End Primary School
Certain people seem to be under the impression at that AfD that WP:SCHOOL is not an attempted compromise but rather an attempt to include pretty much all schools. Since you seem to think it is a compromise, you may want to discuss this with them. JoshuaZ 20:11, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
reply to your comment
Hey, you left a comment on my discussion page but reverted it for some reason. Anyways, I'd be glad to help, and inclusionism most certainly is NOT absurd. I'll get right on it :). Mk623SC20K 22:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- oh, seems it's been fixed! great. sorry i couldn't get there in time, i should log in more often. Mk623SC20K 22:07, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
your comment
Hi Kappa Centrex reverted your comments on my talk page (as if I wanted that?) so I wasn't aware of the situation until it was evidently too late. Thanks for keeping me posted. I am interested in this type of thing, despite what the censors may think. Thanks Joe 22:03, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Blocked
Your contributions history shows that you have been aggressively cross-posting in order to influence school deletion debates. Although the Arbitration Committee has ruled that "he occasional light use of cross-posting to talk pages is part of Misplaced Pages's common practice", such cross-posting should adhere to specific guidelines found in Misplaced Pages:Spam. In the past, aggressively worded cross-posting has contributed towards an Arbitration Committee ruling of disruptive behavior that resulted in blocking. It is best not to game the system, and instead respect Misplaced Pages's principle of consensus-building, by ceasing to further crosspost, and instead allowing the process to reflect the opinions of editors that were already actively involved in the matter at hand. Thank you. I have also blocked you for 48 hours, as this was not your first offense and previous warnings do not seem to have had an effect. --Cyde Weys 14:40, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'll be discussing this with a view to having it lifted. It was a really silly thing for you to do, but it was days ago. Blocks are preventative, not punative, and it's not anyone's place here to "teach you a lesson." - brenneman 14:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
I'll unblock him so long as he doesn't resume the spam, which seems to have stopped days ago, anyway. Jonathunder 15:24, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Bad faith afd nomination
Hi. Empire of Atlantium has been nominated for afd - for the sixth time. The nomination has been made in bad faith by a suspected sockpuppet. You voted to retain this article in February. Thought you might be interested to know. If not, sorry to trouble you. --Gene_poole 09:05, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Sloppy Jo's Lunchroom
Please reinstate the Sloppy Jo's Lunchroom. That entry was accurrate, informational, and verifiable. It's contents remained consistent with other similar entries ..ie Potbelly Sandwich Works.
Thanks so much and kindest regards, Debi
- Hi Debi. Unfortunately I am not in a position to reinstate the Sloppy Joe's Lunchroom, and I wouldn't really be able to persuade anyone else to. The version I saw was, I imagine, accurate, but it was not verifiable by wikipedia standards, because it had no references and I couldn't find anything on Google. The difference with Potbelly Sandwich Works is both one of size and of the fact that it's easy to find evidence that it not only exists, but that people care enough to talk about it in reliable sources. I recommend that you create an entry for it at wikinfo, yellowikis or someplace like that... it if does accumulate some verifiable external coverage you may be able to try again later. Kappa 01:43, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
North and South Downs
Eh? Why? - CrazyRussian talk/email 00:20, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- They can be looked at as one thing. See also Southern England Chalk Formation. Kappa 00:22, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Puxatony Middle School
Thanks for your interest in Puxatony Middle School. I consider that schools are generally notable, but this article seems to be a hoax. I don't think there is a place called Puxatony in Nunavut, and the name doesn't sound right for an Inuit place name. Puxatony does not appear in List of communities in Nunavut or in Category:Communities in Nunavut. Please take a look at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Puxatony Middle School. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 03:17, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- Please take a look at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Puxatony Middle School. Kappa 03:49, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
"deprod"?
You forgot to add your rationale for removing the {{prod}} from "On The Way To Cape May". Without doing so, some could take it as being a baseless decision — rather a capricious action than one with merit and reasoning. The tag itself also recommends that you do the same: "To avoid confusion, it helps to explain why you object to the deletion, either in the edit summary or on the talk page." Since you didn't annotate either place, I worried you might not have realized that that inaction could be mis-interpreted. Thanks for working on Misplaced Pages, we appreciate everybody's contributions! — pd_THOR | 18:07, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- If my edit summary is just "deprod" it can generally be taken to mean "I don't agree that this article should be deleted". Sometimes it means "I think this article should be deleted as it stands, but I'd like to give others the chance to save it", or "I think it should be deleted, but others might disagree, so they should get a chance to voice their opinion". Kappa 18:18, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Haverford AfD
I know exactly what you mean. Thank you, and I apologize in turn if I became too touchy. Deletions, especially on this particular topic, tend to get somewhat heated, and it's important to remember that the people arguing against you are still trying to improve Misplaced Pages. On the plus side, it does look as if the article's improving a bit, even if it's all just demographic data so far. Shimeru 04:59, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
By the way, I found that the middle school shared a campus with the high school from the 1930s to the 1950s; the high school moved into a new campus in the 1950s, leaving the middle school with the old campus. WhisperToMe 05:04, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Betrayal on books
Deletions are proposing a guideline which will almost delete any book unless its been covered in "works serving a general audience". Attempts to tone this down have been reverted . I don't think it's fair to betray wikipedia users who want to read about specialist-interest books like this, but your mileage may vary. Kappa 18:55, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Deprodding articles
You are continuing to deprod articles without providing reason, and place undocumentde redirects.
Why do you reverting my changes without explanation? Stop removing prods now. --ArmadilloFromHell 01:29, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- ROFL "Stop removing prods now.". OK, I'll wait 5 days then take them off. Kappa 01:30, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- Stop removing prod tags. People write ""NN" or something like that in their prod statement. Just because you think that's not sufficient, don't remove the tag. Either, fix up the article yourself and remove the tag, or just leave it alone. Almost all prods are deleted within 5 days, and when we do delete them, we systematically review over the article, and judge if it should be kept on Misplaced Pages. Nishkid64 01:35, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- If a prod tag says "Not notable per WP:BIO" and I think "Notable per WP:BIO" I'm going to take it off. Kappa 01:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- Guys, just send all articles to AfD. That's what's supposed to happen when something's deprodded. Yanksox 01:41, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, if you feel have to clog AFD with notable Pakistani actresses and harmless redirects go right ahead. Kappa 01:43, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- Guys, just send all articles to AfD. That's what's supposed to happen when something's deprodded. Yanksox 01:41, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- If a prod tag says "Not notable per WP:BIO" and I think "Notable per WP:BIO" I'm going to take it off. Kappa 01:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- Stop removing prod tags. People write ""NN" or something like that in their prod statement. Just because you think that's not sufficient, don't remove the tag. Either, fix up the article yourself and remove the tag, or just leave it alone. Almost all prods are deleted within 5 days, and when we do delete them, we systematically review over the article, and judge if it should be kept on Misplaced Pages. Nishkid64 01:35, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- I don't like your argumentive tone, and I'm going through your contribs and taking it to AfD. Yanksox 01:51, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
There is nothing in WP:PROD that requires a reason to be given. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 01:47, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not often on Kappa's side on this sort of thing, but if Kappa thinks that it passes an actual guideline then he has every right to remove the prod and should do so. If you disagree, take it to AfD. (And I for one am not worried about "clogging" AfD since they often bring articles to peoples attention and result in improvement that would otherwise not occur). If Kappa were systematically deprodding articles because he liked the topic and it clearly didn't meet the relevant guideline that would be possibly a different case. In any event, vandalism templates were not necessary and unhelpful. JoshuaZ 01:48, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- I do think Ayesha Sana is not notable. Judging from the lack of links from other articles and the number of G-hits (although not always accurate), I don't believe they are notable. And I can't find any external links that can verify any possible future additions tot he page. The appropriate thing to do here is to send to AfD then. Nishkid64 01:54, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- I agree that no reason is required to be given per WP:PROD, however, it is certainly advised that in most cases a rationale should be given. Removing prods for any reason is allowed, but removing prods for no reason seems pretty close to disrupting Misplaced Pages to make a point. Seraphimblade 01:59, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- I do think Ayesha Sana is not notable. Judging from the lack of links from other articles and the number of G-hits (although not always accurate), I don't believe they are notable. And I can't find any external links that can verify any possible future additions tot he page. The appropriate thing to do here is to send to AfD then. Nishkid64 01:54, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not often on Kappa's side on this sort of thing, but if Kappa thinks that it passes an actual guideline then he has every right to remove the prod and should do so. If you disagree, take it to AfD. (And I for one am not worried about "clogging" AfD since they often bring articles to peoples attention and result in improvement that would otherwise not occur). If Kappa were systematically deprodding articles because he liked the topic and it clearly didn't meet the relevant guideline that would be possibly a different case. In any event, vandalism templates were not necessary and unhelpful. JoshuaZ 01:48, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
It's perfectly within the "rules" of Prod to remove the deletion tag without any explanation or edits or anything. It's considered polite and helpful, when de-prodding, to give at least some brief explanation in the edit summary, even if it seems that it should be obvious. Edit summaries make page histories and watchlists more useful, and there's no real reason not to use them. Still, if Kappa sometimes neglects to provide a reason for de-Prodding, I don't see that as a reason to throw rules and warnings at him, more of a reason to ask politely for increased communication.
Kappa, do you think you could make a point of leaving a brief explanation in the edit summary when you remove a Prod tag, to help other editors keep track of what's going on? I get the impression that several people would appreciate it. -GTBacchus 02:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- I agree in principle, GTBacchus, but the problem here is that this particular user is removing prods pretty much anywhere they're placed, without an explanation. To draw a converse analogy: If I hit the random article button one hundred times, and place a prod on each article without even looking at its content and without any reason, I would quickly and correctly be found to be acting in bad faith and wasting the time of other editors, even though in principle anyone is allowed to place a prod tag for any reason. WP:POINT addresses exactly this type of situation-if you disagree with a policy you should debate it, in the appropriate place, not sabotage it to get your point across. Seraphimblade 02:14, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- If you want an explanation of any particular deprod, you can get one. For the general case I have made User:Kappa/deprod. Kappa 02:17, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- Why not put a link to that in the edit summary, if you have nothing more detailed to say? It seems it would be easy, and it might help.
- In reply to Seraphimblade, it's not clear to me that Kappa is trying to sabotage anything, but I can see how frustrating it would be for someone who has added a bunch of Prods in good faith to see them removed without explanation. Kappa, I'm curious, do you find that a majority, or very large portion, of the prods you remove are for some particular common reason? In other words, is there a particular way in which you see Prod being misapplied more than others? -GTBacchus 02:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- I didn't say he meant to. I said he is. Seraphimblade 02:46, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- The most common misapplication is for articles that can be merged, or simply redirected. However I try to say "mergeable" or something in these cases. Kappa 02:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- If you want an explanation of any particular deprod, you can get one. For the general case I have made User:Kappa/deprod. Kappa 02:17, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
ArmadilloFromHell is way out of line here. I'll quote from my own user talk page to explain my position: "...anyone can remove the prod immediately and at any time, with or without a reason. Merely removing the prod isn't necessarily a statement of disagreement with the person who placed the prod, but it is a statement that at minimum, further discussion is desired, although it could also mean more. A prod is a Sword of Damocles, an immediate threat of speedy deletion that is removed when a deletion is debatable. It's intended to be easy to remove. Please don't take it so personally when people remove your prods, don't put them back, and don't tell people they can't remove them unless they meet your arbitrary standards first." Posting vandalism warnings in response is absolutely wrong. Unfocused 02:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- I agree that warnings (especially a final one) may have been counterproductive-removing prods isn't a blockable offense by any policy, nor is failing to comment on them (and I disagree that a single subpage constitutes a meaningful comment). I would, however, like to see specific objections to the deletion of specific articles. If nothing else, the person who placed the prod may have overlooked something in favor of the article remaining. In that case, a specific explanation would prevent an unneeded AfD request, while removal without explanation is likely to immediately send the article to AfD.
- However, keep in mind that we do have an ArbCom for a reason-and much of that they deal with is those who are gaming the system per WP:POINT, violating completely the spirit of a guideline or rule while keeping within a strict interpretation of its letter. Kappa, I believe that you are following the letter of the PROD rules, but by failing to examine each PROD proposal on its individual merits (or at least in failing to provide your rationale in anything other then a single "form letter"), I believe you're violating the spirit of them-that prods should be removed by those with a specific, genuine objection, not with an ax to grind against deletion in general, much the same as in the reverse situation I provided above-prodding a bunch of articles and figuring "the ones that should really stay will get sorted anyway." You're rather doing the reverse of that-removing prods left and right so that "AfD can sort it." Seraphimblade 02:46, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)I'm petty sure ArmadilloFromHell made an honest misake, and it would be frustrating to see 100 prods removed for seemingly no reason. The excerpt you quoted, Unfocused, is correct and well-stated; focused, even. -GTBacchus 02:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- For your information, you are mistaken, none of the prods that were removed were put there by me, so there was nothing I could possibly take personally. --ArmadilloFromHell 02:35, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- Kappa, how can you be sure that other users will think that the article should not be prodded? If you are thinking about what other Wikipedians will think, then you must also believe that there are others who will want to delete the article. You have to look at both sides here, not just one. Nishkid64 02:42, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- Again, it does not matter. Perhaps we should have called it "uncontested deletion" instead of "proposed deletion." It is kind of like seeking unanimous consent for deletion. Kappa's actions amounted to the Misplaced Pages community noit granting unanimous consent, therefore the article should go to AfD to seek a wider consensus for deletion. Before prod, all of these articles went to AfD and it was tedious, to say the least. There were tons of uncontested AfDs, so hence, WP:PROD. The authors of prod wanted to make it crystal clear that it was only meant to act as a pressure release valve on AfD and be wide-open to objection. As I said, it can be frustrating, but the system works. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 02:49, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- Kappa, how can you be sure that other users will think that the article should not be prodded? If you are thinking about what other Wikipedians will think, then you must also believe that there are others who will want to delete the article. You have to look at both sides here, not just one. Nishkid64 02:42, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- For your information, you are mistaken, none of the prods that were removed were put there by me, so there was nothing I could possibly take personally. --ArmadilloFromHell 02:35, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
RfC
You may wish to comment on the RfC about you: Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Kappa. Regards, Kavadi carrier 12:30, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Merge tags
Related to the prodding issue, I have a question for you. I think we both agree that merging is in many cases preferable to deletion. I hope you would consider, when you edit an article to "deprod per WP:MERGE", to add a {{merge}} to the article. Of course this is not a requirement or anything, but it may be helpful to other editors, as well as spread the "idea" of merging (which, to my perpetual surprise, many editors seem not to have heard of). Yours, >Radiant< 08:50, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yes I'll try to do more of that. Does seem to be a lost art. Kappa 08:58, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Warning
Calling admins "parasite" () has no possible good outcome. I recommend you review WP:CIVIL. Guy 00:16, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- I was referring to deletionists in general, not this admin in particular. Kappa 03:24, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- Oh that's charming, so instead of making a personal attack on a single editor you made it on a class of editors. Does that somehow make it more ok? JoshuaZ 06:54, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- Deletionists are people who take knowledge away from the world because they don't acknowledge that Misplaced Pages has any obligation to provide it. Kappa 19:42, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- First, the knowledge is available elsewhere so the "deletionists" aren't taking anything away. Second of all, Misplaced Pages has no obligation to anyone or anything. This is a project to make an encyclopedia. Third of all, some information is more important or more relevant than others and `having unverifiable or unnotable topics leads to cluttering, more vandalism to deal with and a variety of other issues. Fourth, if you think Misplaced Pages should have all information why distinguish between Wikibooks, Wikinews, Wikisource, Misplaced Pages or any other Wikimedia projects? Furthermore, why ever remove any sourced information. We should then have entries on every sinlge human with their name and date of birth if we can verifiy it. JoshuaZ 19:46, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- And regardless of your feelings on the matter that is no reason to call other editors "parasites" (I am however, happy that you are at least not attempting to votestack the newest DRV). JoshuaZ 19:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- The deletionists are taking it away from every human being on the planet who needs help getting it, to whom wikipedia is obliged to help provide "the sum total of human knowledge". Kappa 04:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Repeating yourself doesn't make the claim more true. Again, the information is still out there, just not on Misplaced Pages. Do you think we should have a biography of every human whom we can find any verifiable data point at? Because that's where your claim seems to lead and I think even you see that as absurd. My earlier responses to this comment still apply (a long with a note that in common parlance "sum total" when talking about an area of information doesn't necessarily mean every single detail). JoshuaZ 04:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yes repeating myself doesn't seem to be getting the point across, so this will be the last time. You are betraying every human being on the planet who needs help getting access to knowledge. Kappa 07:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Jenny Rom
Hi,
The G11 choice on my part was heavily-influenced by the lack of sources, and the article's lack of clarity. ("Given that the article is presently unverified, confusedly-written, and a bit fan-ish, I can justify CSD G11 as the best option for Misplaced Pages," thought Xoloz to himself) Knowing your talent for cleaning-up anything, I'll gladly undelete if you'd like. Best wishes, Xoloz 19:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- Since you didn't reply directly, I've gone ahead and userfied her for you to clean at your convenience: User:Kappa/Jenny Rom. FWIW, I agree with Unfocused below. You do enormous good for Misplaced Pages, and no one should ever forget that. Best wishes, Xoloz 19:03, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Good Work
It seems to me that Misplaced Pages in general is getting less inspiring and more depressing, but you're doing good work. I don't understand how anyone could prod Vitsœ without doing the ten second Google search to verify that they truly are notable, and then nominate it for deletion without doing that same ten second search, but they did, and that's the environment here lately. I think that the expanded deletion powers may have made some editors just plain lazy.
However, please don't let people get under your skin. It seems possible that some you've sparred with are doing this intentionally to have an excuse to block you. Don't give authoritarians any excuse to do that. You're adding value here by helping prevent the removal of valuable content added by other good-faith contributors. If you have to, step away from the deletion arena for a while; we'll miss you greatly, but it'll still be there later.
I appreciate almost all that you do here, and thank you for doing it. Unfocused 15:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Civility
Regarding , simply dismissing arguments as "bullshit" is both uncivil and counterproductive. Comments like that are why the current school AfD situation is so toxic. Please don't do that. JoshuaZ 04:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- I didn't simply dismiss it as bullshit, I explained why that's what it is. Kappa 02:24, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- JoshuaZ, weren't you arguing to me recently that AfD wasn't toxic? Here? I'm completely cool with it if you've changed your mind, it would indicate perhaps you're feeling empathy with the editors whose good faith efforts are being removed. Unfocused 09:13, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Image:Mcdonalds fruitnwalnut salad.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Mcdonalds fruitnwalnut salad.png. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 09:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
British Rail Class 37 37025
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article British Rail Class 37 37025, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Misplaced Pages:What Misplaced Pages is not and Misplaced Pages:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Misplaced Pages or discuss the relevant issues at Talk:British Rail Class 37 37025. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 03:36, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Engro Chemical
I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Engro Chemical, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Misplaced Pages, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Engro Chemical. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Brianyoumans 19:37, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know. Kappa 01:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Since I haven't seen any improvements or arguments about why this is notable, I have sent it to AFD. --Brianyoumans 02:56, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks again. Kappa 02:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Since I was wrong and Engro does meet WP:CORP (I should have done better research in advance), I have improved the article somewhat. I hope you like it! --Brianyoumans 17:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks again. Kappa 02:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Since I haven't seen any improvements or arguments about why this is notable, I have sent it to AFD. --Brianyoumans 02:56, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Hoshin kanri - we can delete the copyvio part
On Hoshin kanri, I didn't notice the copyvio - the copyvio passage can be (should be?) deleted. Is the copyvio against http://www.tqe.com/hoshin.html? --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:06, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- It's here , the bit starting "In 1965, Bridgestone Tire". I'll go take it out of the article. Kappa 03:11, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Can't get at it because I don't have a Google Books account - but that's trivia. I augmented the PROD reason a bit as well and will excise the copyvio from the transwiki entry. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:28, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Deleting Categories of Jewish Athletes
Hi. I know that this is an issue that has interested you in the past. At http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion#Category:Jewish_fencers some people are suggesting that Jewish athletes, beginning with Jewish Fencers, should be deleted. I do not think that is the correct approach, or consistent with wiki policy, and thought that others might want to weigh in on the discussion. --Epeefleche 23:49, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Changes to University of Guyana
Hello there!
I made some changes tonight to the University of Guyana, mostly the adding of the notable alumni and notable faculty and administration. Clearly, the University has had many notable people go through it, it is amazing that the article has been abandoned by almost every editor. Feel free to tweak my edits and let me know what you think (particularly if you can find a good source for the alumni, I just added them by the "what links here" connection). Thanks and happy editing.--Thomas.macmillan 02:43, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Lee jung hyun - nuh video screenshot.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Lee jung hyun - nuh video screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 21:31, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
AfD nomination of Dominic Larrey
An article that you have been involved in editing, Dominic Larrey, has been listed by me for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Dominic Larrey. Thank you.EnsRedShirt 10:04, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
List of Afghan companies
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article List of Afghan companies, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
I've been cleaning up categories for companies, and believe this list is now redundant. Egfrank 21:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Wow.
I just took a moment to read through your archives, and I'd like to commend you for outstanding work maintaining general civility and level arguments. It's an admirable quality in a person, to be so concrete in personal ideologies. ALTON .ıl 07:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
List of pubs
As someone who has contributed to the talk page discussion on List of publications in philosophy and/or that article's previous deletion debate, I thought you might be interested in participating in its new nomination for deletion which can be found here. Thanks. - KSchutte 17:22, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Attempt to delete subcategory of Jewish athletes
Well, they are trying to delete a category of Jewish athletes again. This time, figure skaters. See http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_April_14#Category:Jewish_figure_skaters . I pointed out to the originator of the attempt that we had addressed this general issue already with the main category and with Jewish fencers, where the attempts failed (due in part to your help). Still, they insist on trying to delete this category. Any help by your weighing in on the issue would be appreciated. Thanks again. --Epeefleche 00:25, 16 April 2007 (UTC)--Epeefleche 20:12, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Air Force Amy
- The Air Force Amy article has been nominated for deletion for a second time. I see in the past you voted to keep the article. Perhaps you might want to do the same again. -- TrojanMan
- Hardly, Kappa. Eusebeus 10:59, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah good work keeping wikipedia whore-free there Euse. Kappa 18:22, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Image:Hustpierpoint College.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hustpierpoint College.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- zzuuzz 10:27, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Southern Cayuga High School
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Southern Cayuga High School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Nick Garvey 20:49, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- I noticed you removed the {{prod}} tab. Do you plan on improving the article? I don't see how it meets WP:N at all. If you don't plan on improving it, I'm unsure why you removed the tag. Nick Garvey 20:18, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- I don't mean to be a constant bother.. but I still can't see anything that meets WP:N. I'm probably going to open an AfD discussion shortly if there still isn't, just figured I'd give you the heads up, don't want you to lose all your work if you can meet WP:N.Nick Garvey 18:58, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- You might be able to kill off this one. Actually I don't enjoy making articles about random high schools but I can make if more necessary. Kappa 23:03, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- I don't mean to be insulting, and I guess I'm being bold, if not in the usual sense, but aren't you implying exactly the behaviour advised against in WP:POINT? SamBC 13:59, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- I don't believe improving wikipedia's coverage of high schools to be disruptive. Kappa 16:24, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- I think it's still clearly not the best way to make this point. There should be some sort of central discussion. If you think there should be a policy describing consensus that all high schools (or equivalent designations in other countries) are notable, draft one and propose it. At the moment, there does not seem to be any such policy (or, afaict, consensus). Don't get me wrong, I have a lot of respect for you and your views, even if I disagree with them; I just want to see this resolved in a less messy fashion. SamBC 18:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- I don't believe improving wikipedia's coverage of high schools to be disruptive. Kappa 16:24, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- I don't mean to be insulting, and I guess I'm being bold, if not in the usual sense, but aren't you implying exactly the behaviour advised against in WP:POINT? SamBC 13:59, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- You might be able to kill off this one. Actually I don't enjoy making articles about random high schools but I can make if more necessary. Kappa 23:03, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- I don't mean to be a constant bother.. but I still can't see anything that meets WP:N. I'm probably going to open an AfD discussion shortly if there still isn't, just figured I'd give you the heads up, don't want you to lose all your work if you can meet WP:N.Nick Garvey 18:58, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Propinquity
I haven't spammed anything. I found that wiktionary had one definition of the word and wikipedia had another. Clearly this is not right. I don't know how to resolve it short of AFD which seems to me to be a machine gun to kill a grasshopper. I am not an admin or even a widely experienced user. Rather than accuse me of bad faith, could I suggest that you offer a constructive suggestion to resolve the problem. --Concrete Cowboy 12:07, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- It looks to me like there is an encylopedic discussion in Misplaced Pages and a dictionary definition at Wiktionary. That is the way it should be. Kappa 23:10, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Alternative would involve moving the discussion of propinquity effect back to a separate page and turning propinquity into a disambiguation, maybe even a redirect to closeness which is already a disambig. Kappa 23:29, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Image:Willard - Steel Mill.jpg
Hello Kappa, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Willard - Steel Mill.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Kappa/Willard (band). This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:24, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
-2007-05-19T07:24:00.000Z-Image:Willard_-_Steel_Mill.jpg){kind=link}
No content in Category:Ben 10 episodes
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Ben 10 episodes, by TTN, another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Ben 10 episodes has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Ben 10 episodes, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Category:Ben 10 episodes itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:28, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
User:Kappa/Kaaos
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article User:Kappa/Kaaos, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Calton | Talk 05:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Stay the hell off my user pages please. Thanks
Nope. Thanks. --Calton | Talk 08:25, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- OK I have an asshole stalking me. Great. Kappa 08:26, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- Not even wrong, but thanks for playing. Oh, by the way, this makes for informative reading. Remember it when you comment on the MFD discussion. --Calton | Talk 08:43, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- I voted to keep the material in your userspace. However, your comments above constitue a personal attack. Consider this a warning. —Gaff 19:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- Not even wrong, but thanks for playing. Oh, by the way, this makes for informative reading. Remember it when you comment on the MFD discussion. --Calton | Talk 08:43, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Your edits to Eyes On Me
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Eyes On Me. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Kariteh 14:17, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Swearing and the rest of the b/s that happens.
Hey dude,
I see you keep getting "done" for swearing. I actually don't see what the big fucking deal is but a lot of people on here are so bloody anally retentive. I got blocked once for saying "bitch". Ha! I do actually agree with you about what's happening with the Eyes on Me thing but unless we can make it notable enough and pull it semi-away from Final Fantasy then it will have a chance to stand alone and have it's own article. Good luck, and really who gives a fuck about the swearing. The context of what you're saying is still getting through. RIANZ 00:50, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:Trophy.jpg
Hmmm... I'm sure you have a good explanation as to why you uploaded Image:Trophy.jpg but I'm not sure I'm interested. I've deleted it. Pascal.Tesson 03:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't upload it, I was trying to get it deleted so I tagged it with {{delete}}. I didn't realize it was actually the Commons page I had to get deleted. Kappa 11:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Spam in Elan School
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Elan School, by 160.79.149.226 (talk · contribs), another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Elan School is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Elan School, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Elan School itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:21, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
How is this "blatant advertising"?
- Elan School is a private, residential behavior modification program and school (beginning with 9th grade and extending beyond high school completion) in Poland, Androscoggin County, Maine.
- It was founded in 1970 by psychiatrist Gerald Davidson and Joseph Ricci. In 2005 it had an enrollment of 172. The annual cost is $49,071.96.
- The school's treatment methods are based on the "TC" or therapeutic community modality popularized in the 1950s at facilities such as Synanon, and later at Daytop Village.
The vast majority of the article read like a brochure. Hardly surprising given that it turns out it was a direct cut and paste from http://www.elanschool.com/about.htm & http://www.elanschool.com/admissions.htm. Is that what you created? I can restore the article for you, but only if you make sure that you don't let the article get in this state again. (I'm going to be away today but may have time to do it tonight). Please let me know. (please use my talk page) Spartaz 04:33, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- That's what was in the Google cache. You admin priviliges don't right you the right to delete things just because you are too fucking lazy or imcompetent to check the history. Kappa 19:25, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- I don't think there is any call for swearing. I have already offered to undelete this. I don't think it is unreasonable to ask you to keep an eye on the article - surely its on your watchlist. Since I'm a very new admin I have asked on AN/I for advice on whether I handled this correctly. Spartaz 08:05, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
DO SOME REAL RESEARCH ON THE ELAN SCHOOL, THE INFO YOU HAVE IS A SHAM, THERE COULD BE A REAL INTERESTING DEFINITION AND STORY IF YOU JUST LOOK INTO THE FACTS —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.68.45.2 (talk) 03:35, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Personal attacks
Hi there. You're an established enough editor, so I'm not going to insult you with a boilerplate warning. However, you're here long enough to know that this comment is entirely unacceptable here. I know you're annoyed about the article being speedied, but there's no call for that - Alison ☺ 08:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of listings magazines
I've nominated List of listings magazines, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that List of listings magazines satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and the Misplaced Pages deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of listings magazines and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of listings magazines during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Until(1 == 2) 16:30, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
AFC
Hello. Please do not remove non-sense from AFC. Just deny them with a template. -Flubeca 04:55, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- LOL "just". I don't see why I should waste my time typing out templates around junk, so next time I'll just leave it there. In any case that was also a personal attack, and shouldn't have been left around for google to find. Kappa 05:01, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry for bursting in here, but I tend to agree with Kappa. It is perfectly fine to remove AFC submissions which are obviously not made in good faith such as personal attacks, patent nonsense, and basic vandalism. Since the submission was not made in good faith, there's no point in templating and keeping it for the submitter to find later, as the submitter very likely isn't interested in actually creating an article at all. -- ShinmaWa 21:12, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Regarding Baby bonds
Thank you for noticing the copyvio I missed. I do try to check against the references and googling select phrases on the AFC's I pass, but I let that one slip. I'll try to be more careful in the future. Henrik 09:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
ethnic health or ethnicity and health
thaks Kappa for that helpful edit. i did wonder about which title to use as I prefer ethnicity ... to ethnic. but wasn't sure. as a wiki virgin i'm a bit uncertain about key actions like setting up a references section, so had to dump references into the text which isn't cool: maybe I shall learn.
(I should have logged in then you'd know where my talk page was but I'e not found it myself yet)
ceehd.
Dates of birth for fictional characters
Fictional characters aren't born. The dob for McGonnagal in Harry Potter should be referenced in the text, not in-universe as you have done. Ccrashh 13:36, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Heeeey Kappa
Since you don't seem to have been by Wiktionary in a while, please drop in here. Cheers! bd2412 T 04:10, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Mani Madhava Chakyar
Hi Kappa, hope you remember me (you had helped me with the above article etc). My article Mani Madhava Chakyar has been translated to lot of other languages. In Malayalam wiki (ml.wikipedia.org) one of the picture i had contributed is been selected as feautured one and pic of the day. I would like to know then, whether it is automatically becomes a Featured Picture in en.wiki?(http://ml.wikipedia.org/%E0%B4%9A%E0%B4%BF%E0%B4%A4%E0%B5%8D%E0%B4%B0%E0%B4%82:Mani_Madhava_Chakyar-Sringara1.jpg)
Again that picture was slightly modified in ml.wiki, now if i want to use that in my english article , how can i transport it from malayalam wiki to english? What is the procedure of using my GFDL image in other languages wikis? is it like i have to upload the photo again and write the details? Please help me..Sreekanthv 07:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Enjoyed reading your talk pages...
... I'm a bit of a serial deprodder too :) Every now and then I'll cruise through the prod category - pick all the 'foreign sounding' names, do a bit of research and then deprod about half for being ridiculous nominations in the first place. Frankly, if you create a new article on En WP called Frank 'Bubba' Smith then chances are it will survive, try creating one called Nop Bayarith and it will be speedied within minutes :)
The first name I just made up and the second is a notable Khmer singer who was speedied not long ago - sigh.
Anyway, I came by to thank you for resurrecting the long dead List of Cambodian companies. It's watchlisted, wikiprojected, assessed and surrounded with AP mines. Any bugger who tries to prod, speedy or AfD this core Wikiproject article is in for a fight - thanks and see you 'round AfD! Cheers, Paxse 17:40, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- LOL you're welcome. I did strike me that wikipedia seems to need more articles on Cambodian companies, especially non-bank, non-airline companies... maybe this will stimulate development. Kappa 17:47, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Sprawl Control
Given what I've read of your history (on WP) and views, I'd very much appreciate your input to the discussion and development of my Sprawl Control Policy Proposal. Thanks. SamBC 17:47, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Sumo
I just was reading through your pages. Hopefully you don't think any of us at Wikiproject Sumo are deletionist. I found this group of intergrationists which I think fits what we are trying to do better. I don't think not having your own article is demoting by any means -- we just went through protecting the sumo glossary By putting all the yokozuna into context on one page I think makes a stronger context for everything.
Also, I noticed you put up a lot of pictures of all the yokozuna today. that's great! if you are interested that much in sumo, you should consider joining the sumo wikiproject. XinJeisan 06:35, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- Any normal person would think that someone who is only worth discussing as part of a list is less notable than someone who gets his own article. Kappa 15:07, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Merger proposed: ValueRx → Express Scripts Incorporated
It has been proposed to merge the content of ValueRx into Express Scripts Incorporated. Since you have previously edited one of these articles, I thought you might be interested. You're welcome to participate in the discussion if you like. --B. Wolterding 13:16, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
gunbai
I see you have un-redirected gunbai's article and added some to it. Good show; if there is content to add to the articles they shouldn't be redirected. Some more information about gunbai would also be great. Malnova 22:56, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
expanding articles
I made the glossary as an answer to all the stubs; another answer is actually expanding the articles and giving them some depth. Keep up the good work and getting rid of those nasty redirects :) Malnova 01:02, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Imraan Faruque
Good catch on the uav author and designer--some ip address had added a bunch of useless and un-important information. I'll leave the notability tag up on it for now and keep it on my watchlist. Happy editing and keep up the good work. ]
Muslim Association of Canada
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Muslim Association of Canada, by another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Muslim Association of Canada fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Muslim Association of Canada, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 03:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
List_of_songs_about_masturbation is in it's 5th AfD
List_of_songs_about_masturbation is up for it's fifth AfD. You participated in an earlier one. If you wish to participate again, please go to Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_songs_about_masturbation_(5th_nomination) -- Lentower 03:57, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of schools in India
List of schools in India, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of schools in India satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and the Misplaced Pages deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of schools in India and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of schools in India during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Blueboy96 13:26, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Lauder - Morasha School
Lauder - Morasha School, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Lauder - Morasha School satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and the Misplaced Pages deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Lauder - Morasha School and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Lauder - Morasha School during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Kolindigo 21:04, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Alexis y Fido
I didn't enjoy your comment here. Be careful, man. You could end up in trouble. --Boricuaeddie 15:35, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- BTW, I'm making it my top priority to hunt down these reggeaton articles and I'm going to nominate all that meet the deletion policy. Be alert. How's that for m:deletionism ;-) --Boricuaeddie 16:10, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- That would explain why you aren't bothering to look for sources properly. Kappa 16:25, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- You aren't, either. --Boricuaeddie 16:27, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- *Sigh* I give up. If people want to keep useless reggeaton articles, then so be it. :-( --Boricuaeddie 18:24, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- You aren't, either. --Boricuaeddie 16:27, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- That would explain why you aren't bothering to look for sources properly. Kappa 16:25, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Westcombe House
I noticed you removed the prod without comment. The article is now listed at AfD instead. Please if possible specify reasons for removing the tag next time. Thanks! Eliz81 09:23, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| To Kappa: I kept running into you at AfD in 2005. I'm glad to see you're as vigorously inclusionist as ever! Keep up your campaign and don't let those deletionsts get away with it. AndyJones 12:29, 1 August 2007 (UTC) |
Shaw house and centre
hi, I'm watching this article with a bit of interest as a member of both WikiProject Shopping Centre and the Notability Drive. The reference you added to the annual report is quite a good find - however from terms of addressing notability, it would be regarded as a trivial reference because the annual report which mentions Shaw House, is not about shaw house. What the article really needs, are two secondary references, about Shaw House.
Personally, I think the article is actually saying something which is a lot better than a lot of articles about similiar types of buildings, so it would be a shame for the article to be deleted. But so far I don't know that it has met any actual inclusion criteria. Garrie 21:20, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
AfD closure
I don't need a reasoning; that would a bias on the judge, right? I only need to determine a result, which was to delete. Consensus was pretty clear in the discussion. Sr13 03:18, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- What persuaded you that there was a clear consensus? Kappa 03:23, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Recreation
Hi Kappa. Please do not recreate an article right after it has been deleted through AfD. You are welcome to submit Grand Hyatt Hong Kong to deletion review. Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 18:53, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- So how long do you think I should have waited? Kappa 21:42, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Grand Hyatt Hong Kong, to Misplaced Pages. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Finngall 20:33, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- I've deleted the page again and put it up at DRV. You know full well that this is the correct procedure and I'm not sure why you would choose not to follow my advice. Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 04:56, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Misplaced Pages:Deletion_review/Log/2007_August_4#Grand Hyatt Hong Kong. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. – Chacor 05:34, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- I've deleted the page again and put it up at DRV. You know full well that this is the correct procedure and I'm not sure why you would choose not to follow my advice. Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 04:56, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of hotels in Hong Kong
List of hotels in Hong Kong, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of hotels in Hong Kong satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and the Misplaced Pages deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of hotels in Hong Kong and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of hotels in Hong Kong during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Pascal.Tesson 01:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Kappa. Please keep your temper in check . You've been here long enough to know that this isn't conducive to productive debate. Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 19:54, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe I shouldn't have expressed my anger but I don't think lies are very conducive to productive debate either. Kappa 23:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Ho-Oh
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ho-Oh. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. If you want to discus it go to WT:PCP. -WarthogDemon 05:31, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- What's it got to do with them? Kappa 05:34, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'm confused. You mean other than the fact the Project has decided to merge most of the pokemon articles into lists after discussion on the project's talk page? -WarthogDemon 05:35, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Look even your 3rr message says to use the talk page. What authority does the Pokemon project have over Japanese mythology? Kappa 05:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Japanese mythology? Huh? Neither your warning or your argument is making a lot of sense to me. -WarthogDemon 05:39, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- OK either read the fucking talk page or read the fucking lead. Kappa 05:40, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- I have looked at the article's talk page. It says nothing contesting the merge. -WarthogDemon 05:41, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- I am not contesting the merge, I am saying it needs to be a disambig. Try to follow the discussion. Kappa 05:43, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- A disambiguation for what? Ho-Oh and Japanese Mythology? -WarthogDemon 05:43, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Actually it works better as a redirect to the right place. Kappa 05:50, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- A disambiguation for what? Ho-Oh and Japanese Mythology? -WarthogDemon 05:43, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- I am not contesting the merge, I am saying it needs to be a disambig. Try to follow the discussion. Kappa 05:43, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- I have looked at the article's talk page. It says nothing contesting the merge. -WarthogDemon 05:41, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- OK either read the fucking talk page or read the fucking lead. Kappa 05:40, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Kappa I agree with you for a disambigation only, I protected rather than to block both of you guys, even though you two does deserve a block for silly edit warning. And Kappa, see WP:CIVIL. Thanks Jaranda 06:09, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Japanese mythology? Huh? Neither your warning or your argument is making a lot of sense to me. -WarthogDemon 05:39, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Look even your 3rr message says to use the talk page. What authority does the Pokemon project have over Japanese mythology? Kappa 05:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'm confused. You mean other than the fact the Project has decided to merge most of the pokemon articles into lists after discussion on the project's talk page? -WarthogDemon 05:35, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Be Civil
Let's try to discus this civil. Fuck is a great word to use in anger, but there are places not to use it; here is not a place to use it. -WarthogDemon 05:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Ho-Oh
I've looked over this issue briefly, and I think that the two of you seem to be misunderstanding each other.
Kappa, this is an article about Pokeman, (which I gather is a game of sorts, but I'm not sure) and Ho-Oh is a named character in that game. This has absolutely nothing to do with Japanese mythology in the context it is used. You can not just decide to change the page into a disambiguation. And you cannot just redirect the page to what you feel like it should go to. The current Ho-Oh page must redirect to the page: List of Pokémon (241-260)#Ho-Oh as per the discussion on the page Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Pokémon.
And please do not use obscenities when talking to others, even on your talk page, that is a personal attack, and not allowed on Misplaced Pages. Both of you should probably take a step back, breathe, and realize this is not an issue to get up in arms over. And Kappa, you need to stop redirecting the page to something unrelated to Pokemon, or you risk being blocked from editing. You both are violating the 3RR rule, so please stop. Thank you, 05:56, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- What should someone who types in Ho-oh looking for a discussion of a Japanese phoenix do? Kappa 05:59, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Well, my first suggestion would be to go to the Japanese Misplaced Pages, as I'm guessing that's the Japanese name for the phoenix? I fully understand your frustration, translating into English, and trying to find what you're looking for, but there are other ways to go about it, rather than engaging in revert wars, and using obscenities towards others in the community. (And I'd like you to realize that WarthogDemon was doing recent change patrol, not targeting you for some specific reason - his reversion was valid, the page was supposed to be merged along with the other hundreds of Pokemon character pages.)
- If Ho-Oh is the absolute ONLY way to say phoenix in Japanese (which of course, I do not know), then I suggest you go to the Pokemon project talk page, and discuss the issue in a civilized manner, and ask for someone to create a disambiguation page for Ho-Oh. But you cannot simply redirect to another page without regard for the context it is most often used in.
- I'm not going to be involved further in the issue, as I've given you about as much information as I can, and I'm not someone who knows about this Pokemon thing, so additional information will need to come from the project page. I hope you can understand, and you can realize that it is simply a misunderstanding between you two, and need not be an issue to attack someone on. Thank you, 06:10, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Um why don't you go read the article I redirected to? Kappa 06:14, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- I did. It has nothing to do with Pokemon game characters. The page has been protected. If you have further issues, take it to the Pokemon project page, please. Thank you, 06:15, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Um why don't you go read the article I redirected to? Kappa 06:14, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
I Have Backed Out Of The Dispute
But please, stop harrassing User:ArielGold. I brought her into this to try and clear things up (which actually caused more confusion, admittedly, because I thought she was a part of WP:PCP when she wasn't). I did not bring her into this to be the subject of personal attacks. If anyone, these attacks should at the very least be directed at me. As it stands, Misplaced Pages doesn't allow personal attacks whatsoever, so please stop. -WarthogDemon 06:53, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- I have since removed myself from this dispute. Please ask at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Pokémon#Ho-Oh. -WarthogDemon 23:55, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- I have stepped out of the dispute. Enough. -WarthogDemon 05:49, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yes you "removed yourself" from trying to understand what was happening a long time ago and instead decided to rely on the 3RR. I just wanted that to be clear. Kappa 05:52, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- I have stepped out of the dispute. Enough. -WarthogDemon 05:49, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Final warn
This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. - specifically this one, which was completely uncalled-for. Please try to be more civil in future - Alison ☺ 06:59, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, I should have realized that user didn't know that they were doing and why. I'll know better in future. Kappa 22:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Point is that "what the fuck are you doing" is not an appropriate response in any case - Alison ☺ 23:19, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- What is an appropriate response to someone who has just joined a revert war by invitation without figuring out why it is happening? Kappa 23:22, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Notification of proposal: Guideline/policy governing lists
Given your participation in recent AfDs involving lists (most notably Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of chefs, I'd appreciate your input on the following:
Misplaced Pages: Village pump (policy)#Proposal to make a policy or guideline for lists
PLEASE NOTE: Civility would be appreciated. Launching into profanity or personal attacks will NOT help your argument at all - to the contrary, it will more than likely hurt it. Just an FYI, given your track record. However, when you're civil, you generally have good insight, as you showed during Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of Iranian women.
Thank you in advance for any thoughts you may have on the topic. Sidatio 16:23, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Do not patronize me, civility is more than you deserve. Kappa 21:53, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Notification of proposal to delete List of Latvians
Please be advised I have removed your notice and responded as in the article's talk page as requested by the template notice. — Pēters J. Vecrumba 01:51, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
ANI
Given your recent behavior, I have begun a discussion on ANI seeing as you've been warned several times to stop. --Coredesat 08:07, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
List of high schools in the United States
A tag has been placed on List of high schools in the United States, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. xxpor |see what i've done 19:18, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Linking to a category
I fixed your comment in Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of chefs, specifically your link to Category:Japanese chefs. In order to link to a category, place a colon in front of category, like so ]. Without the colon, MediaWiki places a page in the category instead of linking to it. You can also use this to link to an image (] gives you Image:Placeholder.png) Thanks, --Phirazo 18:04, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yes I know how, I sometimes forget, sorry. Kappa 00:19, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Prodding copyvios
Please use Template:Copyvio if you discover a copyright infringement, and blank the page when doing so. You can list such pages at Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems following the instructions on the template. Whereas Template:Copyvio gives explicit instructions not to remove the template, to ensure that it is reviewed and deleted, Template:Prod says that anyone is free to simply delete the template. —Centrx→talk • 03:12, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
El Toro Handrail, revisited
Hi, you commented on the last time El Toro Handrail was put up for deletion (here), and had some interesting things to say. I've put it up for deletion again (here), and I'd like you to review the article one more time. ALTON .ıl 06:55, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
August 2007
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wardrobe malfunction, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tiptoety 23:00, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- I would like to apologive for the warning, it was wrong of me and if i could take it back i would. All i saw was removal of text from an article without an explanation of why in the edit summary and assumed it was vandalism, that is my bad. I will be more careful next time. Thank you, See you around! Tiptoety 04:51, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi.....
Prod Patrol
I see that, like me and a bunch of others, you like to keep an eye on Prods. Check out Misplaced Pages:WikiProject proposed deletion patrolling. Also, a different solution to deletion is merging. Check out: Association of Mergist Wikipedians. While there is some stuff that can't fit anywhere on Wiki, most stuff can be merged nicely into an existing article when under threat of deletion. With the use of the subsection redirect "#", a redirect can go straight to the merged section of an article. I find that is less controversial because both the people who want to delete an article and those who want to keep an article end up content (mostly!). SilkTork *** SilkyTalk 09:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Category:Lists of alcoholic beverages
This category Category:Lists of alcoholic beverages appears to duplicate Category:Alcohol-related lists. There is a subtle difference, however we need to be aware of overcategorisation. As I don't like deleting stuff I'm considering putting a {{category redirect|Name}} tag in the category. Would you have any objections? Regards SilkTork *** SilkyTalk 09:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I object. The problem is that List of deaths through alcohol is an alcohol-related list, but not a list of beverages. I'll get back to sorting these lists, I got stalled because of my slow connection. Kappa 12:12, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- OK. As we disagree I'll put it up for discussion to get a consensus one way or another. My preference is for a merge, so that is what I'll be suggesting. SilkTork *** SilkyTalk 21:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Also - Integration
I've just become aware of a small, almost inactive project Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Integration, that you might be interested in, and which looks like it needs reviving. Good ideas, and good links on there. Regards SilkTork *** SilkyTalk 09:44, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:Lists of alcoholic beverages
I have nominated Category:Lists of alcoholic beverages (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for merging into Category:Alcohol-related lists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. SilkTork *** SilkyTalk 21:27, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Mammals of canada
Thanks for giving List of mammals of Canada a quick once-over. Some of the stuff you fixed in the lead was really embarrassing. Circeus 23:06, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. Can you have a look at the row with "Nortwestern Deer Mouse" in? Not sure how to fix it myself. Kappa 23:08, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Lists of fictional people
Good work on categorizing all those lists! For future reference, though: The correct category tree for lists of fictional characters is Category:Lists of fictional characters, not "Category:Lists of fictional people". --Paul A 03:19, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Sociolinguistics research in India
Hi, I just wanted to let you know that the Sociolinguistics research in India article has been substantially improved since you !voted in the AfD. If you have time to take a look and comment again on the AfD that'd be great. Thanks! --Zeborah 06:21, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of St Peter's Woodlands Grammar
An article that you have been involved in editing, St Peter's Woodlands Grammar, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/St Peter's Woodlands Grammar. Thank you. --B. Wolterding 11:19, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Foo-Americans and others
I suspect the deletionists will not be satisfied until they have deleted every single Foo-American list, if not also categories. The criteria for deletion is so subject to manipulation by deletion experts who fully spend their time in WP honing their deletion skills, I don't see what successful opposition will be. Writers/contributors to articles are not experts in arguing for retention. Hmains 04:50, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Song merging
Hi. I don't mean to be a jerk about the merging thing ("Freedom") and upon closer inspection I see WP:SONGS does not specifically outline that cover versions should be merged together. That said, there has been a long-standing effort by many editors to get multiple versions of songs put into the same articles (I can name quite a number of them here if you really want them, plus there is a user with a check-off list that people have been working from).... in addition a few of the "model" articles within WP:SONGS are set up this way (merged) and I think the general consensus is that song articles are about songs, not singles. Perhaps its time to reopen the discussion about cover versions in the WP:SONGS talk page. - eo 13:15, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Alright go ahead and merge it but at the moment it's broken, its two articles on one page. Also when you merge things you are supposed to mention where they came from in the edit summary see WP:MERGE. Kappa 13:18, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Hellbore AfD
Hi - Suggest you check out your redirect Wikilink. It looks like you made a typo in Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Hellbore. Thanks. — Becksguy 10:54, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- I regard real flowers as more important than fictional weapons systems. Hellbore is a common (if maybe archaic?) spelling. Kappa 10:58, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry for thinking it was a typo. You have a point. I added a comment in support of a disambig page to address your concern. Thanks. — Becksguy 21:54, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
3RR
Please note that you are in danger of violating WP:3RR at Tamao Satō. An editor once said at Talk:Hitler, "don't say he was evil; just document his actions, and let the reader decide, based on his/her moral views, if he was a good man or a bad one". This applies here. Don't say she is well-known, just document her work and that she has been voted unlikable, as you have already, and let the reader decide if she is "well-known", as many people (such as me) may have very different definitions for that word, therefore making it a POV and a violation of WP:NPOV. --Boricuæddie 22:49, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Are you telling me she doesn't fit your definition of "well-known"? Kappa 22:53, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- No, I'm telling you that, by adding that, you are violating WP:NPOV, a policy, WP:PEACOCK, a guideline, and WP:3RR, another policy. --Boricuæddie 22:54, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- So we agree she is well-known, but you think it's POV to say so, despite the evidence? Kappa 22:56, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- I don't make the rules, I just enforce them, except when I ignore them. --Boricuæddie 22:57, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, and, BTW, you violated WP:3RR. I warned you, man. --Boricuæddie 22:58, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes thanks for the warning. I know you are "just following orders" that's why you are reverting without discussion. Kappa 23:00, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry it had to be like this. --Boricuæddie 23:11, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- I think the problem with the 3RR is that it actually discourages "rule-enforcers" such as yourself from attempting anything challenging like talking. Kappa 23:38, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes thanks for the warning. I know you are "just following orders" that's why you are reverting without discussion. Kappa 23:00, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- I did talk; you ignored me. --Boricuæddie 23:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Show me a diff of me ignoring you. Kappa 23:42, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- See all the diffs at Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/3RR#User:Kappa_reported_by_User:Boricuaeddie_.28Result:_.29. --Boricuæddie 23:43, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Alright fuck it, I'm talking to a total moron. Go ahead and ban me. Kappa 23:45, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- See all the diffs at Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/3RR#User:Kappa_reported_by_User:Boricuaeddie_.28Result:_.29. --Boricuæddie 23:43, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Show me a diff of me ignoring you. Kappa 23:42, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, and, BTW, you violated WP:3RR. I warned you, man. --Boricuæddie 22:58, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- I don't make the rules, I just enforce them, except when I ignore them. --Boricuæddie 22:57, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- So we agree she is well-known, but you think it's POV to say so, despite the evidence? Kappa 22:56, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- No, I'm telling you that, by adding that, you are violating WP:NPOV, a policy, WP:PEACOCK, a guideline, and WP:3RR, another policy. --Boricuæddie 22:54, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Civility
Please in the future mind the phrases you use. Also calling editors names is not recommended either. I see you have had warnings in the past, and as such, I will block you from editing for a few hours to prevent further disruption if this happens again. Regards, Navou 21:45, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages.
Per the same above! Pat 21:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Unprotection of Tamao Satō
Hello. I'm going to request the unprotection of Tamao Satō, as you appear to be unwilling to discuss any changes. I can only do this if you accept the fact that you are wrong and that I am right and move on. If you are unwilling to do this, I'm afraid the article's going to stay protected. --Boricuaeddie is now Agüeybaná 01:43, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, please don't lie, you are the one who is refusing to discuss changes. Kappa 01:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, then. We'll have to keep the page protected. --Boricuaeddie is now Agüeybaná 01:47, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- You do that. Kappa 01:51, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, then. We'll have to keep the page protected. --Boricuaeddie is now Agüeybaná 01:47, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Hissatsu attacks PROD
Edit summary there really says it all. --tjstrf talk 04:54, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Your User Page
Hi Kappa. Please don't disparage other users on your userpage, as you are currently doing with Boricruaeddie. Referring to him as having a "limited intellectual capacity" just because you have a difference of opinion regarding policy is decidedly uncivil. Please think about rewording your comment; just take out the personal attack. Thank you, bwowen talk•contribs 18:21, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- The reason I think he has a limited intellectual capacity is his refusal or inability to engage in discussion. Kappa 22:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- The diff is gone, so I'm not disparaging anyone in particular. It's important for newbie editors to know that wikipedia contains this type of individual. Kappa 22:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- (ec) Because thee only thing that needs to be discussed are the terms of your cease and desist of your attacks and violations of our policies and guidelines. IMO, there are only two ways this can be solved:
- 1.) You accept that you are wrong and move on. (suggested)
- 2.) You do not accept that you are wrong, continue to attack me, keep reverting my edits when the article is unprotected, and you get blocked.
- You choose. --Boricuaeddie is now Agüeybaná 22:13, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- See what I mean? Kappa 22:14, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, yeah, 'cause leaving a message on my talk saying "Fuck you" so demonstrates your intellectual capacity. --Boricuaeddie is now Agüeybaná 22:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Since you ignore anything I say , I have no particular incentive to be polite. Kappa 22:23, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- I don't believe that's a good reason to be rude to other people. Please remember that personal attack is not acceptable at all --Cyktsui 14:48, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Since you ignore anything I say , I have no particular incentive to be polite. Kappa 22:23, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, yeah, 'cause leaving a message on my talk saying "Fuck you" so demonstrates your intellectual capacity. --Boricuaeddie is now Agüeybaná 22:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- See what I mean? Kappa 22:14, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Lauren Cohen (economist)
At AFD you did not clearly state your vote for Cohen which should say Keep if that is your sentiment.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 19:41, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Stone Partridge
For some reason, I had to check out this page and I understand you started it. I think you made a mistake. I doubt very much that this bird is called Keklik. As far as I know, this is the name of a kind of rock partridge, the chukar (Alectoris chukar=A. kakelik). Dogo 21:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- I created that for an anon at articles for creation. Let me take a look. Kappa 21:49, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Disappointment
As you say, there was another AfD, in which there was a clear consensus to delete. I am obviously aware that a previous AfD produced a vote to keep, but correct procedure requires that we determin consensus on the basis of opinions registered in the current debate. WP:VFU is now known as WP:DRV and, as you say, this is the place to go to try to get the page reinstated. I personally take no view whatsoever, I merely took note of consensus. If further debate results in the page being restored, then good for you. --Anthony.bradbury 23:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
List of Beatles songs
With respect to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of Beatles songs, I'd appreciate your input at the talk page. Just in case your willing to spend further time here with a possibly wikistress reducing activity. Cheers --Tikiwont 10:24, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Ejemekwuru
Hi Kappa, thanks a bunch for all the Nigeria-related articles you've been creating.
With regards to linking to allAfrica, two things. One, since it expires to non-subscribers eventually, could you try to link to the original newspaper's website if possible? I tried this with the Daily Champion yesterday or so and it didn't seem to have a copy, but with papers like the Vanguard and the Guardian, direct links can usually be found. Second, I find it best to leave off the Country: prefixes at the beginning of titles, because these are allAfrica's doing, as opposed to being part of the original title. Picaroon (t) 02:41, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- Good ideas, thanks. Kappa 02:43, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Soul 2 Soul
A tag has been placed on Soul 2 Soul, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages per CSD g2.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Misplaced Pages criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Phgao 13:11, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Images
I noticed you prodded an image. {{Prod}} is only for articles and the user namespaces; not for images. --Agüeybaná 18:49, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- If someone tells you an image is copyvio, you have an obligation to get rid of it. Kappa 22:35, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- I'll try {{db-copyvio}} instead. Kappa 22:38, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Orkney islands
Thanks for your comment at Misplaced Pages:Featured list candidates/List of Orkney islands i.e. "Thank you, I like this list much more now." I am not sure if you intended to voice formal support for the candidature, or if you had further comments or objections. If you could clarify this there I'd much appreciate it. Thanks for your interest in the topic. Ben MacDui (Talk) 21:37, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Many thanks! Ben MacDui (Talk) 21:56, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
WP:ALBUM#Non-English
Hi there. Can we please discuss the wording on WT:ALBUM. There are a number of other problems with your wording, but let's start with deciding what we want to say, before we decide how to say it. Please post to WT:ALBUM and describe what it is you wish this section to convey. --PEJL 12:48, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
- Please, let's discuss this at WT:ALBUM. --PEJL 12:56, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Deprodding
If you would be so kind, please assist me in listing all the articles you deprodded on AfD. I'll start at the back end of the alphabet, you start at the front. Thanks, SolidPlaid 02:08, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- You must be joking. Why don't you find someplace to merge them? Kappa 02:09, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Merge tags
Hi Kappa. When you place merge tags, as you did on phagy, please create a section on one of the talk pages explaining your reasons for putting the merge template up. Also, please ensure both pages direct to a single page from the 'discuss' link. You can use the code {{Merge|Destination|Discussion page|date=Month 2007|Your name}}. Cheers. Richard001 06:53, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello...
There is a user looking for help with a Japanese musical article and you've been recommended (not by me) as a source who might be able to help. Please see the discussion here . I believe the links at the top of your page misidrected her to User:Agüeybaná. She's been posting hither and thither for help in quite a few places. I've asked her to keep her discussion to her talk page or the article's talk page. The article in question is Moeko Matsushita. Cheers and happy editing, Into The Fray /C 04:07, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
E. M. Cope Middle School
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article E. M. Cope Middle School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Tomj 20:55, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Sierra Vista Mall (second kick at the can)
Ummmm...I noticed you did not actually place a !vote at the AfD(2nd try). I do hope that you do do so, as now I believe the Citations will be able to stand on their own merit. Exit2DOS2000 07:41, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
No content in Category:Cro
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Cro, by another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Cro has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Cro, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:00, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Kazumi Tanaka
Kappa, you have to help me! Kazumi Tanaka is up for deletion! If it gets deleted, I can't recreate it myself! And if that happens, Christmas is ruined! If I have to ask to have it recreated, there may be almost a 100% chance that it may be kept deleted! You gotta help me!Kitty53 (talk) 02:42, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
FYI, a discussion re: Lists of mammals in X articles
I noticed you changed some names of "List of mammals in X region" articles a while back. There's a discussion on how to name those articles at Misplaced Pages:Village pump (assistance)#List naming dispute: "in" vs. "of", and although I assume you'll disagree with me, I'd still appreciate your input. Noroton (talk) 19:05, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:Female activists
I have nominated Category:Female activists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Women activists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. LeSnail (talk) 19:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
where has kappa gone?
just curious, your talk pages make interesting reading, but I haven't seen anything from you since Oct 20, 2007.
did you get tired of deprodding? xenocidic (talk) 19:31, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- wondering if it had anything to do with your edit summary for http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Sierra_Vista_Mall_%28second_nomination%29&diff=prev&oldid=165798641 ... xenocidic (talk) 19:33, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Framingham High School seal.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Framingham High School seal.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Heros
I added some cites to Heros, an article you created, when it kept being scrapped for a dab for want of references. If you happen to have citations of your own that you used to create it back then, please add them too. Cheers! -- JHunterJ (talk) 00:29, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Elan School
A tag has been placed on Elan School requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. — Dædαlus / Improve 09:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- As I said on the article's talk page, I was kind of tired(3am) when I clicked some buttons. Hence I placed a {{hangon}} tag to stop it from happening. I'm really sorry about this.— Dædαlus / Improve 10:01, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Wardrobe malfunction
The current consensus is that the aticle is merged/redirect to that superbowl article. Please discuss your edits first on the discussion page of either article before reverting again. Garion96 (talk) 13:25, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Bad faith? At least I kept the bad article instead of just the redirect. Stop talking nonsense. Garion96 (talk) 15:52, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, and be civil, it really is not that hard. Calling other editors "thug friends" is not acceptable. Garion96 (talk) 21:48, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:Atomic Kitten
Category:Atomic Kitten, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Cgingold (talk) 04:49, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Arab City Schools
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Arab City Schools, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Pro bug catcher (talk • contribs). 17:33, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of City Montessori School
A tag has been placed on City Montessori School, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Misplaced Pages:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
Speedy deletion of City Montessori School
A tag has been placed on City Montessori School, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Misplaced Pages:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
Proposed deletion of Carol Cummings
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Carol Cummings, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Vinh1313 (talk) 23:30, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Dan Dan Kokoro Hikareteku
Dan Dan Kokoro Hikareteku, an article you contributed to, has been nominated for deletion (direct link). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address the concerns raised in the AfD. Thank you for your time. -- Ynhockey 08:39, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Carol Cummings
I have nominated Carol Cummings, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Carol Cummings. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Vinh1313 (talk) 21:29, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of video games set in New York City
I have nominated List of video games set in New York City, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of video games set in New York City. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 21:25, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
User:Kappa/Jenny Rom
Hi. Are you still using this subpage? - Richard Cavell (talk) 00:37, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Pleinair
I have nominated Pleinair, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Pleinair. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 17:51, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of 14 Year Old Girls
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article 14 Year Old Girls, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. raven1977 (talk) 19:51, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Alex Pickowski
A tag has been placed on Alex Pickowski, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason:
Fails WP:BIO as there are no reliable, independent third party sources beyond a mention in a BBC article in passingUnder the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Misplaced Pages criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. TM 17:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Category:Batha
I notice that this category is unpopulated (empty). In other words, no Misplaced Pages pages belong to (are members of) it. If it remains unpopulated for four days, it may be deleted, without discussion, in accordance with Misplaced Pages:Criteria for speedy deletion#C1. I'm notifying you, the creator of the category, in case you wish to (re-)populate it by adding ] to articles/categories that belong in it.
I have also blanked the category page. This will not, in itself, cause the category to be deleted. It serves to document (in the page history) that the category was empty at the time of blanking and also to alert other watchers that the category is in jeopardy. You are welcome to revert the blanking if you wish. However, doing so will not prevent deletion if the category remains empty.
If you created the category in error, or it is no longer needed, you can speed up the deletion process by tagging it with {{db-author}}.
--Stepheng3 (talk) 20:33, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Raggacore
I have nominated Raggacore, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Raggacore. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 21:39, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Charlene Aspen
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Charlene Aspen, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- fails WP:PORNBIO as recently made more restrictive, no other indication of notability
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:13, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Powerpad
I have nominated Powerpad, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Powerpad. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Gigs (talk) 02:43, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- To clarify, you created a redirect here which was later turned into a somewhat promotional article by IP editors. Probably nothing you need to worry about here, Twinkle did this automatically. Gigs (talk) 03:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Icfai icfai icfai
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Icfai icfai icfai, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Implausible redirect
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Matt (talk) 04:55, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Icfai icfai icfai
A tag has been placed on Icfai icfai icfai, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mpdelbuono (talk) 08:46, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Kappa! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 16 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Kawachiya Kikusuimaru - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Anthony Andrews - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Kenji Ozawa - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Irun Cohen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Connor Price - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Kim Seung-kew - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Valdemar Castillo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Marcial Mes - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Mendi Msimang - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Gerald Rhaburn - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
| More... |
|---|
|
11. Francis Reneau 12. Robert Simonds 13. Cantika Felder 14. Norman Maldonado 15. Lee Ki-young 16. Shin Min-a |
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:17, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Survey on quality control policies
As part of a project funded by the European Commission (QLectives), we are collecting and analysing data to study quality control mechanisms and inclusion/deletion policies in Misplaced Pages. According to our records, you participated in a large number of AfD. We are currently soliciting editors with a long record of participation in AfD discussions to send us their feedback via a very informal survey.
The survey takes less than 5 minutes and is available at this URL. Should you have any questions about this project, feel free to get in touch.
Thanks for your help! --DarTar (talk) 10:11, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Shukan Jitsuwa
The article Shukan Jitsuwa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unsourced stub which fails to establish notability.
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EuroPride (talk) 12:43, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Shukan Jitsuwa
I have nominated Shukan Jitsuwa, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Shukan Jitsuwa. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. EuroPride (talk) 15:25, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Kim Yeong-cheol
The article Kim Yeong-cheol has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chocolate4921 14:42, 9 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chocolate4921 (talk • contribs)
Orphaned non-free image File:End of the moonlight.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:End of the moonlight.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:23, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:Donkey Konga - Super Mario theme screenshot.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Donkey Konga - Super Mario theme screenshot.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:27, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Mick Sleeper for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Mick Sleeper, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Mick Sleeper until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Michig (talk) 16:49, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:Milkacow.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Milkacow.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:35, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Female athletes
Category:Female athletes, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.--Mike Selinker (talk) 06:42, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Lauder – Lea Deutsch Elementary School
The article Lauder – Lea Deutsch Elementary School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- non-notable organization whose current status is entirely unclear
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joy (talk) 12:30, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of List of songs about New York City
The article List of songs about New York City has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- (1) This list does not fulfill any of the allowable purposes for lists under WP:LISTPURP, in that it does not (a) organise or annotate information so as to provide unique content, (b) provide an aid to navigation within the scope of an encyclopaedic topic, or (c) act as a guide to development of content within an encyclopaedic topic. (2) This list does not present information on a notable topic, and further, provides no references or citations such as to support the notability of its topic. (3) This list does not contain any verifable content.
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DustFormsWords (talk) 02:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Buga Kingz
The article Buga Kingz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- A7 -- no indicia of notability.
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 06:16, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Crying Nut
The article Crying Nut has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- A7 -- no indicia of notability.
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 06:22, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of H'Sao
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on H'Sao requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Epeefleche (talk) 18:55, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of H'Sao
The article H'Sao has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:MUSICBIO
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salvio 14:53, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Cry wolf listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cry wolf. Since you had some involvement with the Cry wolf redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). The Evil IP address (talk) 18:44, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of International School of Islamabad
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on International School of Islamabad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Misplaced Pages to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Epeefleche (talk) 07:56, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of The U.S. Air Force (song) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The U.S. Air Force (song) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/The U.S. Air Force (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. PGPirate 23:29, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Milkacow.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Milkacow.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:58, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
SCOUT eh!
When this article was nominated for AfD in 2005 you were involved in the discussion. It has now been nominated again. This is a notification in case you are still interested in taking part in the debate. Regards, DiverScout (talk) 09:37, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Escola Internacional São Lourenço
The article Escola Internacional São Lourenço has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- School no longer exists, page lives on at International School São Lourenço
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Paris1127 (talk) 19:45, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Mia Smiles
The article Mia Smiles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- fails PORNBIO, all awards/noms scene-related, no RS bio content
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:13, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Ratbert for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ratbert is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ratbert until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beerest355 Talk 01:07, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Category:Tree frogs
Category:Tree frogs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:10, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Fine TV
The article Fine TV has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable minor television service; requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. None provided, nor found in Google News.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Wikipedical (talk) 02:22, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Brighton Road
The article Brighton Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- I am unconvinced of this article's notability. Perhaps a disambiguation page would be better?
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Launchballer 15:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Brighton Road for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brighton Road is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Brighton Road (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Launchballer 23:46, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Ian McGregor for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ian McGregor is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ian McGregor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theroadislong (talk) 22:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello
Can you help editing Cupa României or Liga II of romanian football ? I have seen you edited before articles with romanian football related. If everyone will edit one season, all the competition will be done in one weekend ! Thank you !--Alexiulian25 (talk) 14:02, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Signa Vianen
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Signa Vianen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:48, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Shaun Pizzonia
The article Shaun Pizzonia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Although producing all of those listed singles may be acceptable for an article, my searches found nothing better than a few passing mentions at Books, News and browsers therefore nothing to suggest a better solidly notable article.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SwisterTwister talk 07:15, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Tony Eveready
The article Tony Eveready has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No porn awards or nominations. Only reliable sourcing relates to his moderately length but generally non-noteworthy criminal history.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 19:08, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of The Scarlet Singapore for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Scarlet Singapore is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/The Scarlet Singapore until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ibadibam (talk) 23:15, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Category:Food-related lists has been nominated for discussion
Category:Food-related lists, which you created, has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.
Proposed deletion category:Round Square schools page
Hi, i'm not sure if i'm doing this right, but I'm looking for the person who created the category:Round Square schools page. The information on the page is wrong and details a lot of schools who are not member schools and this has been notice by a member of the Round Square board. Please remove this page. Just been asked by the Misplaced Pages team to declare my conflict of interest. I'm the Comms Manager from Round Square.— Preceding unsigned comment added by KatieRoundSquare (talk • contribs) 09:26, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Bionic Tower
The article Bionic Tower has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- It seems after since 2006, this building had never existed at all. Fails WP:GNG for buildings, no references.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donnie Park (talk) 15:44, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Masti Gate for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Masti Gate is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Masti Gate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mpdehnel (talk) 15:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Shin Min-a (disambiguation)
A tag has been placed on Shin Min-a (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates two or fewer extant Misplaced Pages pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
- disambiguates no (zero) extant Misplaced Pages pages, regardless of its title.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. PamD 08:52, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Hobo (German magazine)
The article Hobo (German magazine) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Like Hobo (magazine), another magazine with the same name, this magazine also fails the notability guidelines. Tagged as unreferenced since May 2008.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 02:11, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Ohr Avner Chabad Day School (Volgograd) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ohr Avner Chabad Day School (Volgograd) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ohr Avner Chabad Day School (Volgograd) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. XXN, 23:14, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
List of years in computer games
@Kappa: Article was renominated for deletion. Since you have contributed to this first nomination of the article, I want you to be aware of this deletion and to weigh in on the decision again. Yoshiman6464 16:13, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Pechersk School International
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Pechersk School International, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Misplaced Pages:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. FriyMan 14:34, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Pechersk School International
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Pechersk School International, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Misplaced Pages:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. FriyMan 14:52, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Pechersk School International for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pechersk School International is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Pechersk School International until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FriyMan 15:19, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Swades movie poster.png
A tag has been placed on File:Swades movie poster.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Misplaced Pages (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:39, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Grand Theft Auto: Vice City soundtrack
Hello, Kappa,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Grand Theft Auto: Vice City soundtrack should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Grand Theft Auto: Vice City soundtrack .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Onel5969 11:02, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of May Chiu for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article May Chiu is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/May Chiu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 23:11, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Buckinghamshire College Group
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Buckinghamshire College Group, requesting that it be deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Misplaced Pages:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.buckscollegegroup.ac.uk/welcome. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Misplaced Pages to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Misplaced Pages, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. North America 02:30, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of JDBUG
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on JDBUG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:39, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Category:Female diplomats has been nominated for discussion
Category:Female diplomats, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 02:25, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Dillon Fence for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dillon Fence is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Dillon Fence until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • 09:54, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Parappa for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parappa is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Parappa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 21:05, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Kalev (band)
The article Kalev (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
does not appear to meet notability requirements
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RF23 (talk) 13:06, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Horipro for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Horipro is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Horipro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dom from Paris (talk) 22:29, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of America's Dumbest Criminals
The article America's Dumbest Criminals has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable show that clearly fails WP:GNG for lack of significant coverage from reliable secondary sources.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 23:05, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Category:Lists of British animals has been nominated for discussion
Category:Lists of British animals, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor 17:14, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Dark aeons listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dark aeons. Since you had some involvement with the Dark aeons redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Thryduulf (talk) 13:18, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Category:Military schools has been nominated for discussion
Category:Military schools, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. fgnievinski (talk) 05:26, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Katie Gold for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katie Gold is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Katie Gold (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 20:09, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Immigrant Fleet listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Immigrant Fleet. Since you had some involvement with the Immigrant Fleet redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 03:08, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
"Spiritual Stones" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spiritual Stones. Since you had some involvement with the Spiritual Stones redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 03:49, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of The Horror Movies for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Horror Movies is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/The Horror Movies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:41, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Tibetan Primary School, Jigmenang
The article Tibetan Primary School, Jigmenang has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable topic
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 21:44, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Orcus (Dungeons & Dragons) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Orcus (Dungeons & Dragons) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Orcus (Dungeons & Dragons) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:31, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of That's Shanghai for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article That's Shanghai is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/That's Shanghai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Geoff | 15:09, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Fitri Department for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fitri Department is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Fitri Department until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thanks, (talk) 02:38, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Evelyn Chan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evelyn Chan is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Evelyn Chan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiMacaroons 18:00, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Communities in Barima-Waini
A tag has been placed on Category:Communities in Barima-Waini requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Liz 14:20, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Le Bocage International School for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Le Bocage International School is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Le Bocage International School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HiwilmsTalk 12:43, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Sifundzani School for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sifundzani School, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Sifundzani School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
"14th milennium BC" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 14th milennium BC. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 9#14th milennium BC until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Interstellarity (talk) 19:40, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Apocalypse Hoboken for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apocalypse Hoboken is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Apocalypse Hoboken until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Graywalls (talk) 09:50, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of American Embassy School
The article American Embassy School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Very limited notability about the school. Outside the two New York Times articles which mention the school but in passing, notability is not met here.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:33, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of American Embassy School for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article American Embassy School is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/American Embassy School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:44, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of G.D. Goenka School
The article G.D. Goenka School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:R2 isolated page.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
"G.D. Goenka School" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect G.D. Goenka School and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 10#G.D. Goenka School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. talk 14:15, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
"National Party(New Zealand)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect National Party(New Zealand) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 6#National Party(New Zealand) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:13, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of List of schools in Venezuela for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of schools in Venezuela is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of schools in Venezuela until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 07:29, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Taylor St. Claire
The article Taylor St. Claire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
A porn film actress and porn director lacking significant coverage in multiple reliable sources so that WP:GNG is not passed. Of the sources in the article IMDb is not a reliable source, porn industry sources are not independent and the New York Times article does not mention her at all. A seach on Google found nothing better.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Atlantic306 (talk) 00:06, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Taylor St. Claire for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taylor St. Claire is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Taylor St. Claire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Atlantic306 (talk) 21:22, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Aisha-i-Durani School
The article Aisha-i-Durani School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NSCHOOL. Non-notable school lacking significant coverage in reliable sources.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 33ABGirl (talk) 13:19, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Olympic Primary School for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olympic Primary School is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Olympic Primary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Lavalizard101 (talk) 12:31, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of MAYPOLE TRADITION IN BAVARIA
A tag has been placed on MAYPOLE TRADITION IN BAVARIA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason:
Implausible all-caps
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 85.97.76.66 (talk) 16:19, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
"MAYPOLE TRADITION IN BAVARIA" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect MAYPOLE TRADITION IN BAVARIA has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 27 § MAYPOLE TRADITION IN BAVARIA until a consensus is reached. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:38, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Rudolph Flowers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rudolph Flowers is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Rudolph Flowers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:07, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Shogakukan Progressive Japanese–English Dictionary for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shogakukan Progressive Japanese–English Dictionary is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Shogakukan Progressive Japanese–English Dictionary until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Chidgk1 (talk) 17:18, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Cobalt Flux for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cobalt Flux is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Cobalt Flux until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.DirtyHarry991 (talk) 02:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Category:Top Gear has been nominated for renaming
Category:Top Gear has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 22:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Akpo
The article Akpo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No Secondary sources for establishing notability are available, doesn't comply with WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 22:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Latin Fresh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Latin Fresh is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Latin Fresh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Pitille02 (talk) 09:31, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Categories: