| Revision as of 18:28, 6 March 2017 editEmir of Misplaced Pages (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Rollbackers53,563 edits Notifying about edit warring noticeboard discussion. (TW)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:57, 21 March 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == March 2017 == | == March 2017 == | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="background:#ffe0e0; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height: 40px"> | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| ] '''Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an ] has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.''' | |||
| <span class="plainlinks" style="font-size:88%;">( • • • • ] • ] • • }} • ] • • ], unblock request}}}} checkuser] ()) </span> | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 18:16, 6 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| == Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion == | |||
| If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the ], then contact administrators by submitting a request to the '']''. If the block is a ] or ] block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the ].<br><small>Please note that there could be appeals to the ] that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.</small><p> <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— ] // ] // ] // </small> 06:13, 7 March 2017 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:Blocked talk-revoked-notice --> | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. The thread is ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 18:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:57, 21 March 2022
March 2017
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 06:13, 7 March 2017 (UTC)