| Revision as of 00:45, 21 September 2006 editTyrenius (talk | contribs)37,867 edits →[] review: Thanks for your comments on the above.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:37, 24 September 2024 edit undoPickersgill-Cunliffe (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators37,406 edits Manley Power listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper) | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|3=9 March 2022}} | |||
| == Welcome! == | |||
| If you return to editing please remove the above template. | |||
| Hello, {{PAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.<br/>Here are a few good links for newcomers: | |||
| {{Archive box| | |||
| *] | |||
| *] (Through 10/1/06) | |||
| *] | |||
| *] (Through 11/25/06) | |||
| *] | |||
| *] (Through 2/14/07) | |||
| *] | |||
| *] (Through 4/1/07) | |||
| *] | |||
| *] (Through 9/20/07) | |||
| *] | |||
| *] (Through 12/15/07) | |||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]!<br/> | |||
| *] (Through 5/20/08) | |||
| If you need help, check out ], ask me on my ], or place <code>{{helpme}}</code> on your talk page and someone will show up very shortly to answer your questions. '''Don't be afraid to ask!'''<br/> | |||
| *] (Through 3/18/09) | |||
| If you would like to experiment with Misplaced Pages, I invite you to do so in my own ] (just follow the simple rules!) or in the ].<br/> | |||
| *] (Through 11/11/09) | |||
| When you contribute on talk pages or in other areas, it is important to ] by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. | |||
| *] (Through 10/23/10) | |||
| *] (Through 3/18/11) | |||
| *] (Through 11/3/12) | |||
| *] (Through 4/30/13) | |||
| *] (Through 12/20/13) | |||
| *] (Through 5/31/19) | |||
| }} | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The file ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| Again, welcome! — '']'' <sup>]</sup> 00:56, 3 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote> | |||
| ==Islam and Wine== | |||
| Greetings, I caught sight of your question about Islam and wine. As I imagine you're aware in Islam consumption of alcohol is generally prohibited. Because this is the case I'm not sure how much information connecting the two you're going to find on Misplaced Pages but I've prepared to hopefully set you off in the right direction for your search. You might check with some of the members of ] or the folks ]. Good luck! ] 19:21, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Métayage and complant are the same. Bailleur and prendeur are used to describe the two individuals under métayage. Also your ] and ] articles may belong more appropriately under the ]. ] 14:08, 10 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *:The ] is multilingual and Wiktionary links are easy: use wikt:word in double brackets like this ], or ], or ] to link. Wiktionary is at . See also: ] | |||
| *:As to métayage, I believe that the term is broader than the usage that you have come across so far. It is used in the French translation of Cato, as well as in the French books (listed in the article) referring to a wide variety of practices, from where the landowner furnishes nothing but the land to where he furnishes everything including the seed and hand tools. From where the landowner has no say in the production, through assisted co-management to almost complete management by the landowner or his bailiff. ] 14:56, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> | |||
| Thank you so much for this article and the link. I had heard of the poem but had never seen a text or a summary! ] 11:54, 12 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:01, 25 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ==Métayage== | |||
| == "Boschera bianca," listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Boschera bianca,'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you wish to do so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 13:19, 1 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == "Listán Prieto" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Listán Prieto'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you wish to do so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 16:20, 15 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == "Sotheby's Wine Encylopedia" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Sotheby's Wine Encylopedia'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you wish to do so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> Regards, ]'']'' 15:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| {{-}} | |||
| (Copy:) Hey Andrew, I would love to get your thoughts on how to maybe improve the criticism section of the ] article. It's taken very heavily from the 1911 encyclopedia and a book by J.Cruveilhier, ''Étude sur le métayage Paris (1894)'' and comes across with a sharp POV slant. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks! ] 16:53, 12 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Precious anniversary == | |||
| {{User QAIbox/auto|years=Seven}} | |||
| Anniversaries ... today is the birthday of ] and ], ? --] (]) 07:20, 15 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :Sorry, Agne27, I have to bow out of this one. I feel warm towards the topic, since (to take the first two footnotes) John Crook taught me and I have translated Cato, but warmth doesn't translate into specialist knowledge. Good luck! ] 18:02, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == "Dropping" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> '''<span style="color:blue;">Seventyfiveyears</span> (])''' 14:50, 25 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Gibson statue.JPG listed for discussion == | |||
| ] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 19:19, 11 December 2020 (UTC) ] (]) 19:19, 11 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == ]: May 14–16 == | |||
| ==Thank you for your support!== | |||
| ] | |||
| {| cellpadding=2 style="border:solid darkblue 5px; background-color: lightblue; color: darkblue" | |||
| ] | |||
| |- | |||
| The ] is holding online working days in May. As a member of ], editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months. | |||
| | Greetings, Agne27. Just a quick note to thank you for your support at my ''']''', which succeeded with a final tally of (67/0/0)! Please don't hesitate to let me know if you have suggestions or requests - either of an admin nature or otherwise! :) | |||
| We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities. | |||
| ''']''' (] | ]) 03:12, 17 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| '''More information, and registration details, at <big>]</big>.'''--] 02:33, 27 April 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == ]'s ]! == | |||
| {{-}} | |||
| {| style="border:1px solid black; background:dimgray; padding:3px;" align=center | |||
| == Precious anniversary 8 == | |||
| | <div style="border:1px solid gold; background:white; padding:0px;">]</div> | |||
| {{User QAIbox/auto|years=Eight}} --] (]) 07:00, 15 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| | style="color:lime; padding:5px;" valign=top | Thank you for contributing the<!--Find all the pranks in this letter! :-D--> impressive the pile of '''support'''s gathered on ], which passed with a final tally of ''']'''. I'm happy that so many people have put faith in my abilities as an admin and promise to use the tools wisely and do my best not to let you down.<!--Just don't be surprised if your userboxes start to vanish! Muhuhahaha!--> If I ever may be of assistance, just leave a note on ].<br/>]], the ]-on-demand admin wishes you happy editing! | |||
| ---- | |||
| <span style="float:right; font-size:7pt;">NOTE: This message has been encrypted with the sophisticated ]] algorithm.<br/>Ability to decipher it indicates a properly functioning ].</span> | |||
| | style="border:1px solid gold; padding:0px; background:white;" | ] | |||
| |} | |||
| ==Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Champagne charlie movie.JPG== | |||
| == Alternative closures == | |||
| ] | |||
| Thank you for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Misplaced Pages may not meet the criteria required by ]. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from ] is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an ]; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. | |||
| If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with ]. If you have any questions, please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-disputed fair use rationale-notice --> -] (]) 23:19, 13 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
| The material you've been adding to the ] article is good, but we already have articles for ]s and ]s. Having extensive discussions of them in a separate article duplicates material or fragments the information across several pages. This isn't desirable, don't you agree? — ] ] 00:31, 6 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Champagne Charlie Book.JPG=== | |||
| Same message as above for ] -] (]) 23:22, 13 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == Oscar Renteria nominated for Speedy Deletion == | |||
| I understand you like German Riesling. This site will give you a first impression about German wines appreciated (for the last time) by the passangers of the Titanic: http://admin.macher.intrinet.de/service/art19,982.html?fCMS=8c2881a72591fd8e205195fcff409c8d | |||
| Hello. I recently nominated an article you created for speedy deletion, citing A7. Another editor cleaned up the article recently, after which there are (in my view) too few independent sources needed to establish notability. If you disagree with this nomination, please feel free to contest the speedy deletion on the article's talk page. Thank you. ] (]) 15:55, 1 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
| As far as the prices documented by the wine-lists on board of the Titanic are concerned I'm absolutely sure but I can't give a good quote now, because I havent got the book about me where I read it some years ago. I guess it should have been that one: , only avaiable antiquarian today | |||
| == "Abuela" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 23:55, 9 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == "Wine cats" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <span class="nowrap"> <span style="font-family:courier">-- ]</span><sup>]'']</sup> (she/they)</span> 05:24, 10 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| As you might know, the author Frank Schoonmaker ist considered quite reliable - . ] 07:24, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. | |||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 16:07, 22 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ==Concern regarding ]== | |||
| ] Hello, Agne27. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again or ] that it be moved to your userspace. | |||
| If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it. | |||
| post scriptum: 2001 was great, 2002 fine, but in 2003 German wines quite often contained much to much alcool; I doubt if we should describe 2003 as a great Riesling-vintage in general. ] 13:51, 8 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 12:04, 23 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Reply Appreciated == | |||
| ==Your draft article, ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello, Agne27. It has been over six months since you last edited the ] submission or ] page you started, "]". | |||
| Thanks for responding! I encourage you to continue in the discussion -- the user who has been "stirring the pot" is a former associate who has told me via other channels that his entire intent is simply to sling mud on the project (and me personally) using whatever means necessary (including using wiki resources). At this point I have almost decided to seek and advocate (because I do not have time to fend his effort off singlehandedly). I know you're not a member of the advocate counsel (or whatever it's called), but I welcome the assistance if you are willing to give it. /] 13:18, 10 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia ], the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Geilweilerhof|edit the submission}} and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code. | |||
| == Help in Understanding (a discourse?) ;-) == | |||
| If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at ]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. | |||
| Appreciate the objective viewpoint regarding the ] article. Please note that I did not approach the village pump with the intent of bringing anyone to the bash.org article -- I specifically did not mention the article because I only want to <i>understand</i>, not to win supporters. I support your call and I have a question about wiki that maybe you can help me understand... Sometimes information relavent to a particular subject is not widely dispursed, and likely to go "undiscovered" were it not for those knowledgeholders contributing their information to wikipedia. In many such circumstances, the relavent information may not be of such earth-shattering importance that one would, say, publish an article or write a book about it. Is this information to be lost? | |||
| Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages! <!-- Template:Db-draft-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 12:26, 23 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| Allow me to be more specific... I am not the founder of the QDB project, however I have been one of two partners who have run the site for many years. I did not start the wikipedia article on bash.org, however I have contributed my own personal knowledge to the article. In my early wiki experience with the article I admittedly guided existing revisions in the least negative avenue as possible, however only off and on over several years' time (motivated by ignorance of the wiki-way, not intentional misdeed). For the past several months I've gravitated more towards the understanding that many a great deal of wikinfo is either motivated by forces unseen, unverifiable and possibly untrue, and (in most cases) unencyclopaedic and inappropriate for inclusion in the articles. | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 3#Alsace(wine)}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 06:08, 3 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 21#Loire Valley(wine)}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 21:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 23#Grade A producer of grapes}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 19:37, 23 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| Long story short (too late!): I would be highly unlikely to publish any sort of document detailing the relavent information about bash.org's history, operation, or future projects. It would be even more unlikely that a primary source would ever publish said information. There are lots of articles on wiki that are about subjects who/that have cult-ish followings (bands, websites, projects, etc). Such subjects are outside the mainstream and unlikely to be written ABOUT. However, there are lots of people around the world who would like to know that information. The information that those "in the know" could share would likely go unpublished and "die with the owner" would it not be contributed to a place like wikipedia... | |||
| ] | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason: | |||
| '''SO''' (finally) -- should this info not be included in articles? Does it absolutely always violate NPOV? Without manufacturing artifical "citations" or weasling around the policy, is there any way my info can be included (by myself or others) in a "legal" way. If not (or the old "if people care'd they'd write about it"), is the wiki policy the best solution to make "all the worlds' knowledge available to everyone"? | |||
| <blockquote>Maisa is a personal name, not grapes.</blockquote> | |||
| Thoughts are jumbled right now, so sorry if it's confusing. Any help in understanding would be appreciated. | |||
| Under the ], pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time. | |||
| /] 02:20, 11 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks for the vote! == | |||
| ] article alive. Thanks for your support! ] 12:35, August 18 2006 (UTC)]] | |||
| Here's a little appreciation for helping to keep the ] article alive (at least for the moment!). I'm glad I have your support on this issue, and hope the page continues to grow with the help of other fine wikipedians. | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Maisa|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request ]. <!-- Template:Db-reason-notice --> ] (]) 01:59, 13 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == "Jim" v "Hawkins" == | |||
| I see from http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Jim_Hawkins&diff=70420682&oldid=70398100 that you are suggesting that surnames ONLY should be used in articles. I can't find this in ], could you show me where please? | |||
| :I declined the speedy per ] point 15. ] (]) 02:03, 13 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| I picked three names at random - ], ] and ] - all three have references to them using their firstnames, this makes it more readable IMHO. ] 14:42, 18 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 22#Portugais}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 04:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 15#Marcus Cato}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <small>]</small> <sup>]</sup> 21:53, 15 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==The 50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal== | |||
| {| style="border: 5px solid #584010; padding: .25em; background-color: #e0e0a0; color:#584010" | |||
| Surely if the subject himself is editing own entries to change formal US naming to informal UK naming (as deduced from thorough checking of the history from his British Broadcasting Committee IP address) and in show biz he is referred to more often by informal christian name used on the program (like Kylie or Madonna), then we should stick by his wishes, especially seeing full history of his disquiet with wiki? ] 23:43, 18 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| :I moved this from my talk page as I think it sits better here: | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The 50 ] Creation and Expansion Medal''' | |||
| |- | |||
| ::I agree that the Manual of Style should be more clear but there is several references to writing in a formal tone, which proper usage would dictate that surnames be used for adults as George previously mentioned in the Hawkins history. First names are wholly informal and they give a false impression of "Buddy-buddyness" between the reader and the subject. (as if the subject gave us permission to call him by his first name). On some levels, it is considered disrespectful and an intrusion to automatically assume a first name basis. Especially in light of Misplaced Pages's history with the subject, who has stated quite clearly his disfavor, a respectful and formal tone is the only proper course. ] 21:43, 18 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your work in getting 50 articles through the DYK process. --] <sup>(])</sup> 16:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::: I think Triviajunkie has expressed my thoughts pretty well, so I'll leave it at that ] 13:24, 19 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Braile label.jpg== | |||
| Having checked out MoS (biographies)quite thoroughly I see that it states for subsequent use of names: "After the initial mention of any name, the person '''may''' ''(my embolding)'' be referred to by surname only". So all this stuff I've been reading about it being law, isn't not true. I commend Agne27 for trying to get consensus on this one - my vote is as Triviajunkie states, he's in showbiz and is referred to as 'Jim Hawkins' not 'Hawkins' (which I have to agree does sound very derogatory, but perhaps things are viewed differenly outside the UK) in his publicity material - so my vote is let's change it to 'Jim Hawkins' as a half-way house. ] 15:21, 19 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| == WP:POINT == | |||
| No, they don't. If you bypass your kneejerk reaction and analyze the edits, they're completely in line with policy -- even 100% reasonable according to your own. I'm not illustrating a point, I'm following suit. -] 19:30, 21 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| No, my edit summaries are pretty tame. ''cite needed, eliminate'', ''quotes are not recently submitted'', and the other three are completely factual and to the point. The initial edit has what maybe, possibly, perhaps be construed as you say, but the rest.. no. I appreciate your desire to be an overzealous hall monitor, and I thank you for looking out for the article and wikipedia in general, but it's really unnecessary in this case. -] 19:46, 21 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ignoring the uncomfortably weird untruths below, I came back here to genuinely say thanks for your efforts with ]. While initially undesirable, I think the push for NPOV and citations helped to improve the quality of the article. I'm amending my wikipedia philosophy to include more emphasis on citations and neutral tone, which I think are good things. -] 19:31, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == bash.org == | |||
| can you believe this guy? he is obviously using whatever methods he can to cause static re: bash.org. i'm not really clued enough to know what the proper steps to get this debacle resovled is... can you offer assistance? plz delete upon reception, contact in another method (AIM/yahoo: blaxthos) /] 05:24, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't delete talk page comment. I'm monitoring the article and so far I see nothing alarming. I really don't think Misplaced Pages is the place for disagreements at bash.org to be played out. My recomendation is to step back and let it be. There is nothing deflamatory about bash.org in the article that would call for a pressing response. Let the dust settle.] 16:49, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| don't you think it's a little rediculous (sp) -- not to mention multiple WP:POINT voilations -- that this ex-moderator of bash.org has made it his life's work to cause problems? i left it alone for over a week, and he continues to delete as much information as he can. i don't want anything but a factually accurate, neutral article. i have never thought wiki was the place for the criticism/response portions, but there is plenty of accurate, factual, and in many cases <b>referenced</b> information that this kid is removing to either (a) cause problems or (b) make a point regarding "hall monitors." let's not forget his tone and obvious intent to "rock the boat" too. this isn't about bash.org article, or wiki policy -- to this guy, it's because he lost out on something that eventually became popular. i have plenty of OOB AIM longs with him where he blatantly admits to only using wikipedia as a means to an end -- annoying/irritating anyone who cares about bash.org. petty & childish... | |||
| i asked for it to be deleted because there is no "private" option for wiki mail, afaik. /] 17:08, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Re deletion of ] == | |||
| If you indeed feel that a review is in order, please let me know. The deletion process had enough time, in my view, and the consensus was to delete, even with the portrait. Having a portrait of oneself in a museum and/or by a famous artist is not an indication of notability, but at most an indication of the notability of the painter (or the technique). —] <span style="font-size: 80%">(])</span> 19:30, 9 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == WP:GA Indonesia == | |||
| Hey there how are you going? Thanks for reviewing Indonesia at ]. Honestly, since I joined Misplaced Pages, you are the best reviewer I've ever seen and I'd like to say many thanks for it. So I guess I, or we, better get to work. Okay, can I get back to you again when I have questions about the comments? Cheers, take care -- <span style="font-family: comic sans ms">]</span><span style="font-family: comic sans ms">]</span><span style="font-family: comic sans ms">]</span> 22:07, 9 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi again. For the last one hour, I've been searching for references, ahahah. Also, I am pretty sure those are verifiable and reliable. Could you take a look at it now and tell me what you think. I mean, whether its enough or not. I'm still looking for those under the Ethnic groups section, its really hard to find. Cheers -- <span style="font-family: comic sans ms">]</span><span style="font-family: comic sans ms">]</span><span style="font-family: comic sans ms">]</span> 00:48, 10 September 2006 (UTC) ] | |||
| ==WP:GA on ]== | |||
| Hi there. Thanks for taking the time to review the article on Ram Vaswani. I appreciate the amount of time members of the project take in reviewing these. | |||
| In regards to your points about reliable sources: | |||
| * I would like to suggest that The Hendon Mob tournament links can be considered reliable sources. As Vaswani is one of the members of The Hendon Mob itself, then surely all the information on the site can be considered reliable? (In fact, Robert Butt is an employee of Vaswani.) Links to the Hendon Mob Database are also used in previously-passed GA candidates ], ] and ]. Further to this, the Hendon Mob's database is by far the most complete poker results database on the web, as many others, including the ones online at Card Player and PokerPages ignore the majority of European results. It is also used by professionals worldwide; is frequently referenced from poker discussion forums including ]; by TV broadcasts including ]'s coverage of the ] and by publications including ]. | |||
| * The articles by Joe Beevers are also published on The Hendon Mob site. I feel this can be considered an article rather than a blog, even if it is in diary format. | |||
| * The ] article was published in print worldwide, and the online version is just an archived copy. | |||
| * I presume there are no issues with the references to which Vaswani is the author. ] 01:58, 10 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===Update=== | |||
| Just a quick update on this. I have also now tried to tidy up the references so they are not always at the end of the paragraph. I have also expanded the introduction to assert notability, and have described the origins of his nicknames. Hope this helps! ] 02:18, 10 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] good article == | |||
| Hi Agne, | |||
| After some consideration I still stand by my decision to promote Mike Matusow. | |||
| Most of the article's personal details come from Poker Player Magazine's ''Me and My Big Mouth'' - an interview which presumably remains faithful to what Matusow said. The Hendon Mob references are used largely to report the way particular tournaments have played out something that is less likely to be exposed to rumour. | |||
| I imagine it may be difficult to find authoritative references about modern poker players so I am quite comfortable with the choice of references. I also view the good article standard as a more relaxed standard compared to featured articles so that is probably why the issue of reliable sources concerns me less with good articles. | |||
| ] 05:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Hendon Mob == | |||
| Agne - It's my pleasure. Keeping wikipedia up to quality standards will ruffle feathers, but those feathers are well worth ruffling. I must admit I didn't realize that the Hendon mob website was being used for anything other than tournament results when I chimed in. I haven't had a chance to look at the relevant parts of the site to see what I think yet. When I do, I'll add my comments to the relevant talk pages. Thanks again for your hard work! --''best, kevin'' <b>]<b>]]<b>]</b> 04:25, 11 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Hendon Mob again== | |||
| My pleasure. Although we disagree here, I like to think I'm one of the more civil members of the Misplaced Pages community. ] 06:54, 11 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Indonesia GA comment == | |||
| Hey again, how are you? Sorry for keep bothering you with this article, heehehe. So, this is your comment, "''An area of considerable need for expansion is History prior to the 18th century. There is the link to the main article of History in Indonesia but that link is not meant to replace everything. Rather it's meant to provide more in-depth information on key events and topics that is approached in this article. In a way you can visualize it as a thumbnail or summary presentation that will wet the reader's appetite to want to read more about the subject matter. I would review the History in Indonesia article for more key points that can be added here.''. I'd like to improve it now, but I don't really understand what you were saying, and where did you get the number "18". I've checked ] but I couldn't find anything related or pointing out the 18th century. You help is greatly appreciated. Take care -- <span style="font-family: comic sans ms">]</span><span style="font-family: comic sans ms">]</span><span style="font-family: comic sans ms">]</span> 09:39, 11 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Re: Concern about the GA status of Joe Beevers== | |||
| I have considered your comments, and ] should probably be delisted. I would support such a delisting.--] 13:54, 11 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : I would appreciate it if we can leave this till the resolution of the discussion I raised at ]. I had already resolved the issues with the lead section, and have just merged the trivia points into the main article. ] 17:28, 11 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I would just like to quickly point out that ], which followed a similar formatting to the other articles has just been passed through GA. ] 17:21, 11 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi, thanks for the notification! I appreciate the comprehensivw review you gave, and I'm relieved the only issue raised was image tags ;-) (tis the mood of wikibreak!). I've resolved that issue, replacing the deprecated PD tags with the standard. Again, thanks! ] (]) 05:11, 15 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==GA process== | |||
| Uh... no.. they dont... I have not edited that article, therefore I am an independent editor. Stop trying to distort the GA process. ] 16:31, 17 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Wow! Your rationale for removing the GA sure changed quickly. Wikipedians can remove the GA when they believe the article does not meet the GA merits. However, given your original stated reason for removing it, you can not remove the GA template. I suggest you get another editor, other than Chacor, to remove it. ] 16:37, 17 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::I reverted that edit once so I guess if I revert two more times, I'll consider your thinly veiled threat that I should beware of ]. While deliberately misrepresenting Misplaced Pages policies may work with new editors, it won't with me. I suggest you leave me alone before you dig yourself into a bigger hole. ] 16:42, 17 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I am aware of it, yes. I'm watching the talk page. Cheers. – ]] 16:51, 17 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == how to appear friendly == | |||
| '''regarding Agne's Statement:''' | |||
| "Jannie, I'm more of a friend then you believe and I don't want you to take my comments as an attack. But in the kindest way possible, I have to say that I don't think your comments on AfD is helping your goal of keeping the Toby Meltzer article. Yes there are "politics" to AfD just as there are politics to every other aspect of life (From PTAs to work to family politics). Sometimes with the "fringe votes", it comes down to which side appears more sympathetic and if appear to be hostile to even the very process you are going to steer people into advocating for delete or not even commenting at all. Secondly, I do think you need to re-consider your claims about my ignorance about Andrea James and maybe re-read the comment that is right above yours where I note that I did drop an FYI note on Jokestress page but my intention was to get her help in improving the article to make his notability sufficiently clear. Agne 02:27, 18 September 2006 (UTC)" | |||
| :: In my opinion, one of the ways to be a friend is to act like a friend consistently. For example, your comments in the Meltzer AfD section were entirely unfriendly and needed to refuted. Some times one of the ways for someone in your situation to act like a friend is no say nothing rather than make the unfounded comments you did. I have grown to believe that it is important to cite people exactly as I cited them. I DO NOT take kindly to being accused of plagiarism! That fact the Meltzer AfD is out of bounds should be obvious. I do not consider is politically expedient to "cau tau" in such circumstances. In any event, thus far there are plenty of '''Keep''' votes for the article. I have cached a copy in case things go negatively. Just as there is an AfD, it would be a first, if I were to simply re-create the new and improved article later. If you want to apopear friendly, I would suggest that you consider the statements that you make twice as carefully as you seem to think it is your place to tell me that I should carefully consider mine. You may want to take more time to consider how I might respond to what you write.] 19:53 17 September 2006 | |||
| == Toby Meltzer AfD == | |||
| Thanks for the alert-- I brought up a couple of arguments for inclusion. Looks like it should survive. ] 06:16, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] review == | |||
| Hi Agne27, as one of the 'nameless' editors you mention in your review, I would like to thank you for the very thorough analysis. It sounds very objective and balanced, and I think I speak for both myself and Tyrenius (the other and main contributor) that we would like to work on improving the article according to your suggestions. I personally accept or can live with most of your recommendations. Hopefully once we are done with the changes we can have you glance at it again. Thanks again, ] 18:26, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I agree with Crum375 in thanking you for the time to do the review and your balanced fairness in doing so. I am not sure about some points, which I present below. Your response would be much appreciated. | |||
| :From the outset it is recognised that only the phenomenon of the reaction to her death makes it encyclopedic. I have taken the view that the curious reader will then want to know more things about this person, which do not seem necessarily strictly applicable to the notability, but are either something that will interest the reader, or, in fact, do actually have a relevance. | |||
| :In this respect, her character would seem to be key, and so certain aspects of this have been stated, as in "fun loving". I should say such statements are not OR or MySpace statements, but aspects which press reports chose to print. A lead has been taken from the press reports as to what personal information is relevant to include, and I am not sure that you are aware that this is the source of them, or whether, even so, you consider that this makes a difference. My argument is that we should not include items out of sentiment, nor should we be averse to including them out of a fear of sentiment, which is something that is integral to the subject (i.e. the subject of mass mourning being catalysed). If we do not show aspects of her character which would be the thing that the mourners responded to (and which the press highlighted) then it will not allow the understanding of how this came about. I would also stress that there has been no direct conclusion drawn as to exactly what has affected people: the reader is presented with the facts and left to draw their own conclusion. | |||
| :If, for example, we leave out the epithet "fun loving", then less information about her is available to the wiki reader than is availabe to the newspaper reader, and I believe we need to reflect the information that is in the public domain accurately. I defend the second paragraph of the background section, as it is simply a NPOV reflection of the material that the press highlighted about her. There has thus ''not'' been a POV preference exercised to not include this. | |||
| :Again "last words" and the mother's interaction are also items the press reported. This is a difficult decision, as normally such material might be indulgent editing, but in this case, such information is key to understanding the phenomenon. Perhaps it could be reformulated, but it is such details and circumstances that were presented in the public domain that provided the mass mourning catalyst. | |||
| :I feel the MySpace section is essential for the reader to gain an understanding of what led to the mass reaction, as it is precisely these details that initially did so. It gives an insight into the personality to which people responded. There have been a hundred other MySpace deaths with no equivalent effect. | |||
| :In Aftermath, the "Shelby" tribute is merely an example of the typical reaction. If we are saying there is a reaction, it seems to me the best way to show that reaction is to quote the exact raw nature of it, rather than a remote interpretation into abstract nouns. Alex Milnes appears purely courtesy of ''The Guardian''. They reported his reaction. The article simply reflects their choice of what is notable to cite, not the wiki editor's choice as such. Perhaps it should be stated that ''The Guardian'' said this about Alex Milnes, but this seems to me an unnecessary safeguard. | |||
| :YouTube and MySpace are only used as references about themselves, and thus the usage seems to me to be following guidelines. YouTube statistics are quoted. Material is quoted from the MySpace page. I think we can accept this is genuinely her MySpace page, as this is the basis of the whole article and all the media reports. | |||
| :Re. broad coverage - why/how. I think that was where there was a fear of OR that stopped interpretation of the available data to make such explanations! Guidance would be useful here. | |||
| :NPOV. As I have stated earlier, I contend this article has been written from a NPOV, and it is only this that has forced the inclusion of certain details about her life and personality. NPOV refers to the wiki editor, not to the reported subjects. Thus if a newspaper makes a report of someone's POV (in this case that she was a fun loving person or whatever), it follows editorial NPOV to report that POV. Perhaps it is seen as an editorial comment that she is fun-loving, but it is not. It is a faithful reflection of secondary sources and is tightly referenced. | |||
| :I see the importance, as you have stated, of getting it right, and contend that in the aspects above, we have actually got it right, though I see how this might easily appear not to be the case. | |||
| :Thanks again. Please feel free to copy any relevant aspects of this to the article talk page, if you wish to answer it there. | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:59, 14 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :] 19:24, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| Thanks for your comments on the above. I have responded to them. However, this may be going beyond the call of duty for you, as I'm sure you have many articles to look at. If this is the case, I do not expect any extensive answer. I believe, though, that there are valid considerations that may demand a specific take on this article, and maybe others if similar conditions apply. ] 00:45, 21 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 18:37, 24 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:37, 24 September 2024
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Agne27 has not edited Misplaced Pages since 9 March 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
If you return to editing please remove the above template.
 Archives |
|
Proposed deletion of File:Upper Mississippi Valley.jpg
The file File:Upper Mississippi Valley.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
"Boschera bianca," listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Boschera bianca,. Since you had some involvement with the Boschera bianca, redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. ComplexRational (talk) 13:19, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
"Listán Prieto" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Listán Prieto. Since you had some involvement with the Listán Prieto redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Fpr155 (talk) 16:20, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
"Sotheby's Wine Encylopedia" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sotheby's Wine Encylopedia. Since you had some involvement with the Sotheby's Wine Encylopedia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 15:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Seven years! |
|---|
Anniversaries ... today is the birthday of Claudio Monteverdi and Hans Herbert Jöris, did you know? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:20, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
"Dropping" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Dropping. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 25#Dropping until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 14:50, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Gibson statue.JPG listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gibson statue.JPG, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wcam (talk) 19:19, 11 December 2020 (UTC) Wcam (talk) 19:19, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Queering Misplaced Pages 2021 User Group Working Days: May 14–16
.jpg){kind=logo}
The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.
We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.
More information, and registration details, at QW2021.--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 02:33, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Precious anniversary 8
| |
| Eight years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:00, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Champagne charlie movie.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Champagne charlie movie.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Misplaced Pages may not meet the criteria required by Misplaced Pages:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Misplaced Pages:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. -M.nelson (talk) 23:19, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Champagne Charlie Book.JPG
Same message as above for File:Champagne Charlie Book.JPG -M.nelson (talk) 23:22, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Oscar Renteria nominated for Speedy Deletion
Hello. I recently nominated an article you created for speedy deletion, citing A7. Another editor cleaned up the article recently, after which there are (in my view) too few independent sources needed to establish notability. If you disagree with this nomination, please feel free to contest the speedy deletion on the article's talk page. Thank you. SamHolt6 (talk) 15:55, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
"Abuela" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Abuela and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 9#Abuela until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Faster than Thunder (talk) 23:55, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
"Wine cats" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wine cats and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 10#Wine cats until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (she/they) 05:24, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Jason A. Fox for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jason A. Fox is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jason A. Fox until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Ploni (talk) 16:07, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Geilweilerhof
Hello, Agne27. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Geilweilerhof, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 12:04, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Geilweilerhof
Hello, Agne27. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Geilweilerhof".
In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:26, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
"Alsace(wine)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Alsace(wine) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 3 § Alsace(wine) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 06:08, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
"Loire Valley(wine)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Loire Valley(wine) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 21 § Loire Valley(wine) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
"Grade A producer of grapes" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Grade A producer of grapes has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 23 § Grade A producer of grapes until a consensus is reached. JMWt (talk) 19:37, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Maisa
A tag has been placed on Maisa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason:
Maisa is a personal name, not grapes.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Neygatoo (talk) 01:59, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- I declined the speedy per WP:NOTCSD point 15. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:DDE1:928B:BA5B:616F (talk) 02:03, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
"Portugais" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Portugais has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 22 § Portugais until a consensus is reached. Duckmather (talk) 04:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
"Marcus Cato" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Marcus Cato has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 15 § Marcus Cato until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris 21:53, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
The 50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
|
The 50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal | |
| For your work in getting 50 articles through the DYK process. --evrik 16:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC) |
Orphaned non-free image File:Braile label.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Braile label.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Manley Power
Manley Power has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:37, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Categories: