Misplaced Pages

Latest revision as of 02:31, 29 December 2024

Status:    (Around)

FlightTime Phone (talk · contribs · count)

If this page is protected, feel free to use my alternate talk page here. I do occasionally check that page, but to be sure I'm aware of your post please include {{ping|FlightTime}} with your message. Thank you

If you feel that I have reverted an edit or issued a warning in error, please Click Here and let me know. I am human, and I do make mistakes. Please don't interpret an error on my part as a personal attack on you. It's not, I promise. I ask you to simply bring it to my attention; I am always open to civil discussion. To keep discussions coherent, I will usually answer in the talk page where the first message was placed. If I left you a message on another talk page, please answer there: I will have it on my watch list. Thank you.

Alternate talk page

Welcome To My Alternate Talk Page FlightTime ( talk · contribs · count · accounts · move log · global rename log · uploads · logs · rights) Click here to leave a new message If you're here, then my main talk page is protected. I do occasionally check this page, but to be sure I'm aware of your post please include {{ping|FlightTime}} with your message. Thank you FlightTime It is 7:31 PM where this user lives in the Mojave Desert. Welcome to my alternate talk page. Start a new topic. Archives Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 This talk page is automatically archived by lowercase sigmabot III. Any threads with no replies in 14 days may be automatically moved. Threads with fewer than two timestamps (no replies) are not archived.

This talk page is automatically archived by lowercase sigmabot III. Any threads with no replies in 14 days may be automatically moved. Threads with fewer than two timestamps (no replies) are not archived.

A message from Steffinwolf

Re: Sherry Jackson, About a year ago, you reverted my edit (adding her credit for being on an episode of Perry Mason). You stated reason as; “Not know for that appearance …” Well, she’s known by me, and others that watched, for being on Perry Mason. Please consider undoing you revert. Thank you, “steffinwolf”

Steffinwolf (talk) 09:45, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

@Steffinwolf: Still, she's not "best known" for that. She might not be best known for any one appearance. If it were up to me, I'd say she's best known for her appearance in Star Trek, but that's my opinion and like yours, opinions don't mean shit here. Both of our opinions are covered in the infobox, lets just leave it at that. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 14:11, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

P.S. It was Gunsmoke not Perry Mason. - FlightTime (open channel) 14:15, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

A message from 173.175.200.238

hello! i noticed you reverted an edit by User:2601:14D:4B80:1950:CD4F:D4C9:4B4F:981F to Woodstock. that user has made a number of unconstructive edits recently. based on the style of those edits — overlinking, excessively wordy, a habit of adding the word "dollars" after a $XX figure, etc. — i think the same user was previously editing from the mobile addresses User:2601:14D:4B80:1950:CC09:ADA6:5F11:4BC9 and User:2601:14D:4B80:1950:54E5:FF3A:B045:9059 among others.

nearly all of these edits have been reverted, but the user has not been responsive to talk page messages. i have no idea how to proceed, since the user's address keeps changing, but i think they're just going to continue creating work for other editors. 173.175.200.238 (talk) 21:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

You can report them to WP:AIV. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:11, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

thank you! is presumably well-meant but just ... bad ... editing considered vandalism? 173.175.200.238 (talk) 21:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

If you don't think its vandalism, you can post at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:16, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Revert

"If you came here because I reverted your unsourced change, cite your references in the article you edited; there is no use bringing them here." I see a need to bring it here so I can learn if I am wrong about wikipedia's policies. You reverted my edit on Big (film) because it was unsourced. But 1) what I edited wasn't sourced either and 2) the edit I reverted itself admitted that I was right in the comments. The edited segment literally had this in it:

"!-- 13 at the beginning, 45 by the end; DO NOT CHANGE. At the beginning of the film, the milk carton says the date missing is 9/12/1987 and the date of birth is 1/20/75. Later in the film, Josh tells Susan he is 13, and Josh's mother says "He had a birthday." Josh begins the film at age 12, then towards the end of the film is 13-->" 

and so I switched it to 12, as the edited portion was referring to something at the start of the film. Why, then, is my edit held to much higher standards than what is there currently? It's not that big (no pun intended) of a deal and I can source it I guess, but still. --Bloodloss 02:30, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

• Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery
• Wikipedians willing to set up archiving