| Revision as of 06:37, 22 September 2006 editAtomaton (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,903 edits Please Cite membership, No original research,Use proper citation← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:45, 1 December 2024 edit undoEmausBot (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,853,686 editsm Bot: Fixing double redirect from Issues in social nudity to NudityTag: Redirect target changed | ||
| (61 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| {{Portalpar|Clothes free|CFportal.jpg}} | |||
| {{cleanup-date|March 2006}} | |||
| Like most social movements, the ] which promotes the acceptance of social nudity has garnered a fair amount of criticism for the alleged failures of its leadership. | |||
| :''See also: ]''. | |||
| ==Anti-competition and branding nudism== | |||
| ===Lobbying efforts which would exclude and penalize non-AANR activities=== | |||
| When the American Association for Nude Recration (AANR) had an opportunity to insert protecting language in an anti-nudity Senate Bill 224 ''Municipal Corporations - Regulation of Nudity and Sexual Displays'' in Maryland, its representatives, including AANR East lobbyist Don Murphy, lobbied to adopt language that would exempt only AANR dues-paying businesses, such as clubs, in Maryland. Otherwise individuals would be subject to six months imprisonment and a $500 fine for allowing nudity without AANR affiliiation. This effectively excluded the other ] organization in the US, ] as well as non-affiliated individuals and organizations that participated in clothing-optional activities or attended free beaches including organized beachgoers, nudist or naturist-friendly businesses, and any nudist or naturist club or event not chartered by AANR. One critic said this amounted to AANR trying to own the "brand" on nudism. <ref>{{cite web | |||
| | title = Talk About Nudism | |||
| | date = 2005-8-03 | |||
| | url = http://www.nudist-resorts.org/talk/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1641 | |||
| | accessdate = 2006-09-16 }} | |||
| </ref> | |||
| The proposed ''amendment section (c)'' said "an ordinance adopted under this section may not apply to any event charted by the American Association for Nude Recreation." The amendment failed by a 23-20 vote. | |||
| ===Edging out the competition for INF referrals=== | |||
| AANR is the sole representative for organized naturism and nudism in the United States with the International Naturist Federation (INF). The result is that only AANR is listed as an (INF/FNI) affiliated federation, effectively excluding the main ] organization in the US, ] as well as other significant organizations such as ]. AANR was affiliated long before The Naturist Society came into existence. INF allows only one national organization to be affiliated with it. | |||
| ==Poor to mediocre support for clothes free activism on public lands== | |||
| ===Some organizations have little interest in pushing the envelope for new clothing-optional beaches=== | |||
| Because AANR has chosen to focus mainly on revenue-generating opportunites through its dues-paying clubs and dues-paying members, some contend it is not giving proper consideration to ] such as ], where there are fewer revenue-generating opportunities for AANR. ], ] co-founder, said "The only reason there are so many AANR members is because they are forced to join when they pay their local club dues." | |||
| AANR has no known documented efforts of advocating the establishment of new clothing-optional beaches, which many believe should be the primary focus of organized naturist and nudist efforts. AANR's own FAQ says: "The law can be a little fuzzier when it comes to nudity at beaches and public recreation areas. AANR works to protect nude recreation in such places where there is an '''established tradition''' for sunbathing." So without a policy saying otherwise, AANR does not advocate for the creation of new clothing-optional beaches. | |||
| AANR counters that it has efforts underway to improve '''established''' clothing-optional beaches in Oregon, including ] (Collins Beach) and ] State Park. | |||
| ===Fighting or being indifferent to clothing free activism=== | |||
| ====Fighting topfree activist member==== | |||
| Clubs are allowed free range in discrimating against members engaging in outside activities, including, ironically enough, topfree advocacy. | |||
| In 2003, moved to terminate membership of Dorene Schumacher for topfree activism in her hometown. | |||
| Charles Preston, the Buckridge Park representative, counters, "Do you not feel that we should have the right to protect our investment and business if we feel it is threatened? We did not think it was appropriate to have one of our members hold a top free picnic in the town we were located in. We have worked hard to be accepted as a good business to have in town." {{fact}} | |||
| ====Indifference to public nudity activists==== | |||
| The ] and ] have given cold receptions to protests and activists involved in ]. As an example, no nudists came out to support ] during her trial or protests in ]. | |||
| Some nudists counter that drawing attention to social nudity issues could result in a backlash of even more stringent laws. | |||
| ==Discrimination== | |||
| AANR affiliates with some clubs that choose to discriminate based on of inclusion of gays, singles, same-sex couples, and those with tattoos, piercings, body jewelry. From AANR-SW FAQ: "Some clubs have rules addressing such body decorations. The best idea is to call ahead and ask." ], writer and nudist researcher, says, "The naked truth about the American nudist movement is its failure to live up to the ideal that everyone is treated the same, despite social standing or the shape of their bodies". <ref>{{cite web | |||
| | last = Keen | |||
| | first = Cathy | |||
| | title = UF Study bares contradictions about American nudists | |||
| | publisher = University of Florida | |||
| | date = 2001-10-18 | |||
| | url = http://news.ufl.edu/2001/10/18/nudism/ | |||
| | accessdate = 2006-09-16}} | |||
| </ref> | |||
| The AANR acknowledges that historically AANR member clubs have practiced discrimination, but insists that each club is autonomous and free to make its own decisions and policies as far as admissions are concerned. However, this is beginning to change in favor of singles. | |||
| TNS has also said that their affiliated clubs may impose a single male quota if they deem it necessary. | |||
| ==Child sexual abuse== | |||
| ] has made claims of child molestation and child pornography within the nudist/naturist movement and what she contends is their leaderships failure to address those issues. She contends that AANR and TNS have not done enough to investigate offenders, remove offenders, report offenders to law enforcement, establish even one single national policy, or modify club procedures for dealing with problem behaviors and abuse. An example she cites is William Peckenpaugh, who was charged with multiple sex crimes with a child. | |||
| While many naturists and nudists acknowledge problems in the community, many believe Nikki Craft seems bent on inciting an unnecessary amount of fear into peoples' minds about what they believe is a safe, family-friendly activity. Her critics contend that many private clubs do check the criminal histories of visitors to make sure they do not have documented histories of criminal activity that would be of concern in a family-oriented community. They also point out that sexual predators are everywhere in society and all must be equally vigilant to making sure that both individuals and organizations take initiative in establishing protections against abuse and exploitation. Craft counters that the fact that sexual predators exist elsewhere in society is no excuse for the fact that nudist/naturist leadership fail to take easy and common sense measures to protect the children in the movement. | |||
| ==Other people and movements opposing and offering criticism== | |||
| *] U.S. Rep from ] proposed legislation against nudist/naturist youth camps in 2003. | |||
| *] Pastor, anti-nudity crusader with the Wisconsin Christians United (WCU). Found guilty of criminal disorderly conduct when harassing beachgoers at ] nude beach. | |||
| ] in this section is under dispute. See ] for an understanding of this argument. The response is that any political figures or prominent critics who oppose clothes free activities in a broad sense should be included, regardless of political affiliation or ideology. This section is underdeveloped as several governments have passed anti-nudity laws. For further reading on the clothes free movement and politics in ] refer to ''Naked Germany : Health, Race and the Nation'' by Chad Ross. ] | |||
| *] One of the main leaders of Nazi Germany who wrote anti-nudity ''Göring Decree'' on ], ]. (However, after all, the FKK-clubs could continue to exist if they would clearly confess for the Nazi regime and, for an improved control, associate themselves to the "Reichsbund für Leibesübungen" ). | |||
| *] Nazi Germany leader who said "Nudity is undignified and an error of taste." | |||
| ==References== | |||
| <references /> | |||
| ] | |||
Latest revision as of 06:45, 1 December 2024
Redirect to: