Revision as of 20:41, 23 April 2017 editBoleyn (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers307,295 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:09, 15 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
(12 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
<!--Template:Afd top | |||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
The result was '''redirect''' to ] per ]. There is clearly consensus that this title (and for that matter all various spellings of ] with and without diacritics) should be listed on one disambiguation page, with the others redirected there. Although the editors all think this should be accomplished in different ways, nobody disagrees that should be the result. ] (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>) 16:11, 24 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
===]=== | ===]=== | ||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} | |||
<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Saric}}</ul></div> | <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Saric}}</ul></div> | ||
:{{la|Ivan Saric}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) | :{{la|Ivan Saric}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) | ||
Line 7: | Line 13: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ].] <small>]</small> 19:10, 23 April 2017 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ].] <small>]</small> 19:10, 23 April 2017 (UTC)</small> | ||
*'''Procedural close''' This exact nomination was closed earlier today! Please stop wasting our time and read the recommendation from the closer. ] (]) 20:41, 23 April 2017 (UTC) | *'''Procedural close''' This exact nomination was closed earlier today! Ping closer {{u|KGirlTrucker81}}. Please stop wasting our time and read the recommendation from the closer. ] (]) 20:41, 23 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
::I regret that you consider this deletion nomination to be a waste of time, but I suggest that it should be up to our fellow editors to decide whether this entry remains or is eliminated. As for the contention that this nomination is an exact duplicate of the previous one, I suggest you read the content of that previous nomination and compare it with the content of this one which is a straightforward deletion nomination, not a redirect request, and belongs exactly where it is, not on the talk page, where only ] are !voted upon.] <small>]</small> 21:34, 23 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
*'''Comment''' This kind of ridiculousness is why you are banned from editing disambiguation pages - you just keep getting it wrong. You are '''not proposing deleting this page''', you are proposing it is merged to another page. This title at absolute worst would be a redirect and is a valid dab with several entries, either with articles or meeting ]/]. Your suggestion to merge its contents belongs on the talk page. ] (]) 07:34, 24 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
*'''Redirect''' to ] and expand that to include the less common spelling of ], then cleanup hatnotes. ]] 08:23, 24 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
::Have boldly gone ahead and tweaked the dab page and hatnote - now we just need to close this misguided AfD and create the redirect. ]] 08:29, 24 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
*'''Comment''' {{u|PamD}}, I undid the redirect, as I realised that {{u|Roman Spinner}} - who is topic banned from editing dabs - had deleted two valid entries from this dab while nominating it for 'deletion', making it look like a completely invalid dab. It is not as clear as a redirect as there are 2 dabs with enough valid entries. However, I would personally support a merge and redirect. ] (]) 08:55, 24 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
::{{ping|Boleyn}} Where's the topic ban? We need to report this clear breach and prevent any future such timewasting. ]] 09:22, 24 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
:::Found it. Now to ANI. ]] 09:25, 24 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
::::See ]. ]] 09:35, 24 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
{{clear}} | |||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
Latest revision as of 06:09, 15 February 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Ivan Šarić per WP:SNOW. There is clearly consensus that this title (and for that matter all various spellings of Ivan Šarić with and without diacritics) should be listed on one disambiguation page, with the others redirected there. Although the editors all think this should be accomplished in different ways, nobody disagrees that should be the result. Ivanvector (/Edits) 16:11, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Ivan Saric
AfDs for this article:- Ivan Saric (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No one on this disambiguation page is named "Ivan Saric" and its content belongs within the Ivan Šarić dab page. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 19:10, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguation-related deletion discussions. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 19:10, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Procedural close This exact nomination was closed earlier today! Ping closer KGirlTrucker81. Please stop wasting our time and read the recommendation from the closer. Boleyn (talk) 20:41, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- I regret that you consider this deletion nomination to be a waste of time, but I suggest that it should be up to our fellow editors to decide whether this entry remains or is eliminated. As for the contention that this nomination is an exact duplicate of the previous one, I suggest you read the content of that previous nomination and compare it with the content of this one which is a straightforward deletion nomination, not a redirect request, and belongs exactly where it is, not on the talk page, where only WP:Requested moves are !voted upon. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 21:34, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Comment This kind of ridiculousness is why you are banned from editing disambiguation pages - you just keep getting it wrong. You are not proposing deleting this page, you are proposing it is merged to another page. This title at absolute worst would be a redirect and is a valid dab with several entries, either with articles or meeting MOS:DABMENTION/MOS:DABRL. Your suggestion to merge its contents belongs on the talk page. Boleyn (talk) 07:34, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to Ivan Šarić and expand that to include the less common spelling of Ivan Sarić, then cleanup hatnotes. PamD 08:23, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Have boldly gone ahead and tweaked the dab page and hatnote - now we just need to close this misguided AfD and create the redirect. PamD 08:29, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Comment PamD, I undid the redirect, as I realised that Roman Spinner - who is topic banned from editing dabs - had deleted two valid entries from this dab while nominating it for 'deletion', making it look like a completely invalid dab. It is not as clear as a redirect as there are 2 dabs with enough valid entries. However, I would personally support a merge and redirect. Boleyn (talk) 08:55, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Boleyn: Where's the topic ban? We need to report this clear breach and prevent any future such timewasting. PamD 09:22, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.